Loading...
2020.06.08 - Packet 4141 Douglas Drive North • Crystal, Minnesota 55422-1696 Tel: (763) 531-1000 • Fax: (763) 531-1188 • www.crystalmn.gov Crystal Planning Commission Agenda Summary Monday, June 8, 2020 7 p.m. Crystal City Hall and Zoom Video Conference Zoom call information: https://bit.ly/3cHFONr (meeting ID is 838 2032 1215 and password is 414141) or call-in toll free at 888-475-4499 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes* a. Monday, January 13, 2020 meeting minutes 3. Public Hearings* a. Site Plan review request from Water Sports Investments LLC for a proposed building addition at 5160 West Broadway Avenue (Application Number 2020-03) b. Miscellaneous amendments to the Unified Development Code (Application Number 2020-04) 4. Old Business - None 5. New Business - None 6. General Information a. City Council actions on previous Planning Commission items: – CUP and variance for telecommunication tower at 3200 Vera Cruz Ave N – Site plan for Tumble Fresh laundry at 6023 - 42nd Ave N – Rezoning to PD for specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Dr N b. Update from Council liaison c. Staff preview of likely agenda items for Monday, July 13, 2020 meeting 7. Open Forum 8. Adjournment * Items for which supporting materials are included in the meeting packet Page 1 of 3 CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION DETAILED AGENDA Monday, June 8, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Crystal City Hall and Zoom Video Conference Zoom call information: https://bit.ly/3cHFONr (meeting ID is 838 2032 1215 and password is 414141) or call-in toll free at 888-475-4499 Commissioners, please call 763.531.1142 or email dan.olson@crystalmn.gov if unable to attend * Items for which supporting materials are included in the meeting packet 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at ______ p.m. with the following members present:  Commissioner (Ward 1) Sears  Commissioner (Ward 2) Selton [Chair]  Commissioner (Ward 4) Einfeldt-Brown [Vice Chair]  Commissioner (Ward 1) Heigel  Commissioner (Ward 3) Maristany [Sec. Vice Chair]  Commissioner (Ward 4) Johnson  Commissioner (Ward 2) Strand  Commissioner (Ward 3) Buck  Commissioner (At- Large) Seffren 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES * Moved by _______________ and seconded by _______________ to approve the minutes of the January 13, 2020 regular meeting with the following exceptions: Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS* a. Site Plan Review request from Water Sports Investments LLC for a proposed building addition at 5160 West Broadway (Application Number 2020-03): Staff presented the following: Page 2 of 3 The following were heard: Planning Commission discussion: Moved by _______________ and seconded by _______________ to recommend ______ to the City Council of the Site Plan for the proposed building addition at 5160 West Broadway. Motion carried. a. Miscellaneous amendments to the Unified Development Code (Application Number 2020- 04): Staff presented the following: The following were heard: Planning Commission discussion: Moved by _______________ and seconded by _______________ to recommend ______ to the City Council of miscellaneous amendments to the unified development code. Page 3 of 3 Motion carried. 4. OLD BUSINESS - None 5. NEW BUSINESS - None 6. GENERAL INFORMATION a. City Council actions on previous Planning Commission items: - CUP and variance for telecommunications tower at 3200 Vera Cruz Avenue N - Site plan for Tumble Fresh laundry at 6023 - 42nd Ave N - Rezoning to PD for specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Dr N b. Update from Council Liaison c. Staff preview of likely agenda items for Monday, July 13, 2020 meeting: 7. OPEN FORUM 8. ADJOURNMENT Moved by _____ and seconded by ______ to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at ______ p.m. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – January 13, 2020 CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, January 13, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Crystal City Hall 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the following members present:  Commissioner (Ward 1) Sears X Commissioner (Ward 2) Selton [Chair] X Commissioner (Ward 4) Einfeldt-Brown [Vice Chair] X Commissioner (Ward 1) Heigel X Commissioner (Ward 3) Maristany [Sec. Vice Chair] X Commissioner (Ward 4) Johnson X Commissioner (Ward 2) Strand  Commissioner (Ward 3) Buck X Commissioner (At- Large) Seffren Other attendees: City planner Dan Olson, rental licensing specialist Chee Yang, City Council liaison Brendan Banks, City Council member Nancy LaRoche, Ken Rohlf, Stephen Linn, and Elliot Stendel representing Linn Investment Properties LLC, Jeremy and Joel Larson representing Hampton Companies, and other interested persons. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Strand and seconded by Heigel to approve the minutes of the November 18, 2019 regular meeting. Ayes: Heigel, Strand, Selton, Einfeldt-Brown, Johnson, and Seffren. Abstain: Maristany. Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Site plan review request from Linn Investment Properties for a proposed Tumble Fresh laundry at 6023 – 42nd Avenue North (Application Number 2020-01): Planner Olson presented a summary of the staff report and stated he is recommending approval of the site plan. Olson provided amended language for condition #1 to include language about the installation of the water main. Commission member Strand asked clarification questions about the exterior lighting plan. Olson answered those questions and said that the lighting plan meets the city’s requirements. Commission member Seffren asked where the existing watermain is. Olson said that it’s in 42nd Avenue, but is not sufficiently sized for the new building. The new watermain will be connected in Adair Avenue. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – January 13, 2020 Commission member Maristany suggested that the applicant dim the lights when patrons are not in the laundry. She also wondered if patrons will use the vacuum late at night. Stephen Linn said there are no windows facing the residential properties so lighting should not be an issue. The laundry will be open from 5 a.m. to 1 a.m. He believes that the vacuum is typically not used late at night. Outdoor tables will be available for patrons near the building. Commission member Strand asked if employees will be on site. Mr. Linn said there are cleaning and management staff, but they will not be on site at all times. Much of the building is automated. Strand asked additional questions about building security. Mr. Linn said they have security cameras and motion detectors that assist with security inside the building. Chair Selton opened the public hearing. A Crystal resident asked what the minimum water main size is and if a panic button will be installed inside the building if fights break out. Mr. Linn said he believes that the minimum water main is 6” because of the need for a fire sprinkler system, and that a panic button is not needed because of the prevalence of cell phones. Children would also be likely to push a panic button. Maristany said the proximity of the site to the police station is helpful. A Crystal resident seconded the request of 4170 Brunswick Avenue for the retaining wall to be repaired and a new fence installed. He was also concerned about the outdoor vacuum. This resident asked how the stormwater infiltration basin will work and where the dumpsters will be. Olson explained how the basin will work and showed where the dumpster enclosure location is on the site plan. Olson said that this resident already has a fence on their property, but 4170 Brunswick does not. A Crystal resident asked why the City is giving the alley land to the applicant for free. Olson said the applicant will be the underlying property owner once they close on the property, and the vacation application merely remove the city’s right to construct an alley. Therefore there is no need to have the applicant pay for the alley property. This resident also asked if the water will be coming from Crystal or Robbinsdale. Olson said that half of the Adair right-of-way is in Crystal and the water is coming from Crystal. A New Hope business person said he owns a laundry facility in that city and Tumble Fresh is a corporate business that will threaten his livelihood as a local business person. If this laundry is constructed, there will be four laundries between Highways 169 and 100. Council member Banks asked whether the landscaping will be sufficient to protect the neighbors. Olson described how the landscape plan will screen the parking lot and dumpster, providing a buffer for residents. Mr. Banks asked where the monument sign will be located. Olson showed the location of the sign on the site plan. Commission member Maristany said if a fence is constructed, it would be on Tumble Fresh property not the resident at 4170 Brunswick, creating a gap in the fence at 4171 Adair. Mr. Linn said if that resident wants a fence, he would be willing to reimburse the resident up to $2,000 for that fence. That resident would construct the fence on her own property. A Crystal resident asked if fabric softener sheets smells will come from the laundry. Mr. Linn said he’s not aware of that happening at their other stores. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – January 13, 2020 A Crystal resident said she’s concerned the laundry will be open so late and that the vacuum will be loud. Hearing no one else who wished to speak, Selton closed the public hearing. Commission member Strand said she worked with Linn many years ago on a project and said they do a good job running their businesses. The laundry site plan is well done and will be an asset to the neighborhood. Commission member Maristany said she would like to take up Linn’s offer to pay up to $2,000 for the neighbor’s fence. Olson suggested that rather than making that a condition of site approval, staff can connect Linn with the neighbor to work out the details. Commission members were in agreement with this approach. Moved by Strand and seconded by Seffren to recommend approval to the City Council of the site plan review application for the proposed Tumble Fresh laundry at 6023 – 42nd Avenue North, with the conditions in the staff report as amended. Ayes: All. Motion carried. b. Rezoning to Planned Development from Hampton Companies for a proposed specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Drive North (Application Number 2020-02): Planner Olson presented a summary of the staff report and stated he is recommending approval of the rezoning. Commission member Strand asked what kind of input was received at the neighborhood meeting. Olson said that residents asked questions, but there was a positive view of the development. Commission member Maristany asked if the Edgewood right-of-way should be vacated so it can be incorporated into the development. Olson said the applicant has not asked for that, and the City is probably not interested in vacating that right-of-way since that would land-lock a few properties. Commission member Strand asked why the applicant is not incorporating the lots owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority (EDA) into the development. Olson said the applicant has not expressed an interest in purchasing those lots. Commission member Selten asked if the applicant has other facilities. Jeremy Larson explained where their other facilities are located, and where new ones will be. Commission member Maristany asked why they are putting 25 parking spaces, which exceeds what they are required to build. Joel Larson said that that number of spaces has been proven to be a good number for their facilities. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – January 13, 2020 Commission member Strand, Selten, Heigel, and Einfeldt-Brown asked what types of employees will be on site. Joel Larson described the kinds of medical professionals on site, and that complaints about care are handled through state licensing requirements. Commission member Maristany asked if exterior lighting will be dimmed at certain hours. Joel Larson said lighting will be located in the front away from most residential areas. Maristany asked what the city will inspect. Chee Yang described the licensing and inspection process. The city will not be inspecting resident’s medical welfare. Chair Selton opened the public hearing. A Crystal resident asked where light poles will be. Olson said light poles will be reduced from three poles to two in the front parking lot. The resident also said that this proposal is much more acceptable than the use proposed last year on this property, but he’s concerned about what will happen with the other vacant lots in the area. Hearing no one else who wished to speak, Selton closed the public hearing. Commission member Strand said she thinks the development is well done and she’s voting in favor of it. Selten said he will also be voting in favor of the development. Moved by Johnson and seconded by Strand to recommend approval to the City Council of the rezoning to Planned Development application for the proposed specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Drive North, with the conditions in the staff report. Ayes: All. Motion carried. 4. OLD BUSINESS - None 5. NEW BUSINESS a. Election of Officers: Chair: Motion by Maristany, second by Strand to nominate Selton for chair. Ayes: all Vice-Chair: Motion by Strand, second by Seffren to nominate Einfeldt-Brown as vice-chair. Ayes: all Second Vice-Chair: Motion by Heigel, second by Seffren to nominate Maristany as second vice-chair. Ayes: all 6. GENERAL INFORMATION  City Council actions on previous Planning Commission items: Planner Olson said that the City Council will be considering approval of the conditional use permit (CUP) and variances for a telecommunications tower at 3200 Vera Cruz Ave N at their January 21, 2020 meeting. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – January 13, 2020  Update from Council Liaison: Mr. Banks said the EDA has toured different apartment buildings as examples of redevelopment projects, and had a work session to discuss potential redevelopment around Becker Park.  Staff preview of likely agenda items for Monday, February 10, 2020 meeting. Mr. Olson said he has not received any applications for the meeting, but the deadline is not until tomorrow. 7. OPEN FORUM Commission member Strand said the “Cheers to Crystal” event is March 20, and proceeds will benefit Becker Park. Commission member Johnson asked if the city has thought of placing signs on properties where a development review application has been submitted. Olson said city staff is working on doing that. 8. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Strand and seconded by Einfeldt-Brown to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. 5160 WEST BROADWAY – SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 1 OF 4 __________________________________________________________________________ FROM: Dan Olson, City Planner __________________________________________________________________________ TO: Planning Commission (for June 8 Meeting) DATE: June 3, 2020 RE: PUBLIC HEARING. Site plan review request from Water Sports Investments LLC for a building addition at 5160 West Broadway (Application Number 2020-03) A.BACKGROUND Water Sports Investments LLC, owner of the Midwest Water Sports property at 5160 West Broadway, is proposing to construct a building addition to the rear of the existing commercial building. The applicant is proposing that the existing building will continue to serve as an office showroom for water sports equipment, including boat sales, with the addition used to store boats owned by private parties and products for sale. The property is zoned Industrial and office showrooms and warehouses are permitted uses within that zoning district, but site plan review and approval is required for the building addition and site improvements. Notice of the June 8 public hearing was posted on the property and published in the Sun Post on May 28, mailed to owners within 500 feet (see attachment A), and posted to the Becker, Welcome Park, Twin Oaks, Forest, and Cavanagh Oaks neighborhoods on Nextdoor. Attachments: A.Site location map showing mailed notification area B.Existing zoning map C.Property photos D.Project narrative submitted by applicant E.Site plan (12 sheets) B.SITE PLAN REVIEW Existing use – The property is the site of a 24,000 square foot commercial building initially constructed in 1982 and operating as an office showroom for the sale of boats and equipment for waterskiing, wakeboarding and other water sports. The applicant also provides outdoor rental space behind the building for boats owned by private parties, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Site plan review for 5160 West Broadway 5160 WEST BROADWAY – SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 2 OF 4 during which time they are serviced by the applicant. The applicant also displays products for sale outdoors, such as boat trailers. Adjacent uses The following are the zoning districts and existing land uses surrounding this property: North – zoned Industrial (Thomas Auto Body; vehicle impound lot) East (across the BNSF rail corridor) – zoned Industrial (Kilmer Electric) West (across West Broadway) – zoned Low Density Residential (cemetery) South –zoned Industrial (Randy’s Booth Company) Proposed use - The applicant is proposing to construct an approximately 32,000 square foot addition on the rear of the building. This addition is proposed to enclose all of the boats owned by private parties and products for sale will no longer be displayed outdoors. If temporary outdoor display of products is desired in the future, the applicant can receive staff approval of a zoning certificate application. The following are the notable site plan elements for this addition: Building setbacks and height. The proposed building addition meets setback requirements in the Industrial district. The addition will be 58’ tall, which meets the maximum height of 60’. Although the building is quite far from the Crystal airport, the applicant has notified the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of the proposed building construction. The FAA has given tentative approval to the addition, with the possibility that approval of any construction cranes may be needed. Staff recommends a condition of site plan approval that the FAA give final approval of the building addition prior to building permit issuance. Parking. The existing parking lot will be reduced in size to accommodate the building addition, leaving 36 parking spaces to serve the proposed expanded building. This meets the minimum 23 spaces required by the UDC. Stormwater management and erosion control measures. The city does not require a stormwater management plan when less than one acre is disturbed. The percentage of impervious surface on the property will decrease from 83% to 81% (the maximum coverage is 90% for the Industrial zoning district). During building construction, the city will require erosion control techniques to be used on-site including silt fences, rock construction entrances, and inlet protection. Utilities. An existing storm water catch basin will be enclosed in the new building. As part of the project the structure will have a solid cover put on it with a gasket around the edge to prevent runoff from inside the building from entering the storm water system. Access and circulation. Sheets A2.1 and A2.2 of attachment E show how boats will be delivered and placed within the addition. The city’s Public Works Director and the West Metro Fire Rescue District staff have reviewed this traffic circulation plan and found it adequate to meet vehicle movement into and within the site, including fire trucks. 5160 WEST BROADWAY – SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 3 OF 4 Building elevations. The proposed major exterior building material is prefinished metal siding. These materials meet the city’s requirements. A color rending of the proposed building addition is attachment E. Landscaping. Currently there are no trees on the property. The landscape plan shows the new tree species to be planted as hackberry, American linden, and accolade elm. The applicant proposes to plant two varieties of shrubs. Screening. Trash and recycling receptacles will be stored within the building. Currently there is a chain link fence surrounding the back of the property, with barbed wire above, which is not an allowable fence material. The barbed wire serves to provide security for the boats stored outdoors. Since the boats will now be stored indoors, staff recommends as a condition of site plan approval that the barbed wire be removed from the fence. Exterior lighting. There are no existing light poles on the property and no new poles will be installed. New exterior wall lighting meets the city’s requirements. Pedestrian connections. There is an existing sidewalk along West Broadway that allows for pedestrian connections to the building. Signs. There is an existing pylon sign facing West Broadway. The applicant has indicated that no additional signage is proposed, but if that changes the applicant must receive sign permit approval before installing any new signage. C.Site plan review criteria The following are the relevant criteria for approval of site plans in City Code Section 510.17. 1.The site plan fully complies with all applicable requirements of the UDC. Findings: As outlined in section B, above, the proposed site plan meets UDC requirements. 2.The site plan adequately protects residential uses from the potential adverse effects of a non-residential use. Findings: There are no single-family residential properties in the vicinity of this property. 3.The site plan is consistent with the use and character of surrounding properties. Findings: The property has been an existing commercial or industrial use since at least 1982. The proposed addition is consistent with this character. 4.The site plan provides safe conditions for pedestrians or motorists and prevents the dangerous arrangement of pedestrian and vehicular ways. 5160 WEST BROADWAY – SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PAGE 4 OF 4 Findings: The city’s Public Works Director and staff from the West Metro Fire Rescue District have reviewed the site’s traffic circulation plan and found it adequate to meet vehicle movement into and within the site, including fire trucks. An existing public sidewalk along West Broadway provides pedestrian connections for the area. D.REQUESTED ACTION The Planning Commission is being asked to make a recommendation to the City Council to either deny or approve the site plan review application to allow a building addition at 5160 West Broadway. This recommendation should include findings of fact either for or against the proposal. The Commission may reference the findings for approval in sections B and C, above. Staff recommends approval of the site plan review application with the following conditions: 1.The development shall be constructed according to the site plan in attachment E. 2.Prior to the issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall: a.Sign a site improvement agreement with the city and provide an escrow to guarantee installation of the landscaping plan. b.Provide an approval letter from the Federal Aviation Administration to the city. c.Remove the barbed wire from the existing fence. City Council action is anticipated on June 16, 2020. Site Location and Public Hearing Notice Mailing Map 5160 West Broadway Ave. 4141 Douglas Dr. N. Crystal MN 55422 Attachment A Zoning Map 5160 West Broadway Ave. 4141 Douglas Dr. N. Crystal MN 55422 Attachment B Portion of building facing West Broadway Attachment C Trailers stored in the front of the building South side of building Boat storage at rear of property (location of proposed addition) Boat storage at rear of property (location of proposed addition) Boat storage at rear of property (location of proposed addition) pg. 1 Narrative for Midwest Watersports Storage Addition 5160 West Broadway Crystal, MN May 26, 2020 The Parties Owner: Water Sports Investments Llc Architect: Edward Farr Architects, Inc. Civil Engineer & Landscape Architect HTPO, Inc. Site and Zoning Information Lot Area: 2.2 acres Zoning: I Industrial Min. Building Setbacks: Front = 10 ft, Rear = 10 ft, Side = 10 ft. (all setbacks met or exceeded) Min. Parking Setbacks: All yards = 5 ft. (no proposed new parking) Existing Building Size: approx. 24,235 sq ft Proposed Addition Size: approx. 32,254 sq ft Max. Building Height: lower of 60 ft or 5 stories Proposed Building Height: 58 ft, single story Min Greenspace Coverage 10% (no new impervious surface area added) Company Overview and Project Purpose Midwest Water Sports is a dealer and authorized service center for MasterCraft Boats with a focus on wake surfing, waterskiing, and Wakeboarding. They have the area’s largest selection of wakeboards, surf boards, water skis, and accessories. The company purchased the Crystal, MN building in 2004. An increase in demand for seasonal boat storage is the reason for the addition. There is currently outdoor boat storage in this same rear yard location. Vertical Boat Storage Racks are being purchased that allow stacking boats 4 rows high, thereby providing the additional capacity needed to satisfy market demand. The boat storage will now be fully enclosed, not an outside storage use anymore. No other building modifications are being proposed. Application Site Plan Review on 2.2 acres for a 32,254 sq ft (+/-) boat storage addition to the primary building. Facility Description and Design: The addition will be a single-story structure clad in pre-finished ribbed metal panels. The metal panels will be a soft light-toned neutral color to blend in with the existing building color for consistency and minimal visual impact. The existing building is constructed with light grey concrete block, using a split-face and fluted split face block textures, with a blue stripe accent. The height of the addition will be slightly lower than the maximum 60 ft allowed in this district. Attachment D pg. 2 The addition meets all building setbacks. The front yard setback doesn’t change since the addition is in the rear yard; the addition is set back 194 ft from the West Broadway street exposure so it will be mainly out of view from the public way. The site and rear yard setbacks exceed the 10 foot minimum. No rooftop HVAC equipment is needed; all HVAC will be internal to the building. Clerestory windows have been placed along all exterior walls, 5 feet below the lowest point of the roof. This is to increase attractiveness of the business along with providing natural light into the addition. Vehicular circulation patterns in and out of the site will not change. In the fall, boats on trailers will be pulled straight into this storage building. The boat is lifted off its trailer by a hoist; then the driver makes a U-turn inside the building and exits through the same overhead door. There should be no reason to back into this building with the boat. In the spring, the customer can pull straight into the building with his empty trailer, have the hoist set the boat down on the trailer, make the U-turn again and pull out safely. On-site parking for customers and employees will continue to meet zoning ordinance requirements. There are 33 stalls remaining, including two accessible stalls. See below for parking calculations. Signage: No new signage is needed or proposed. Parking: The facility will continue to have enough parking to satisfy zoning requirements as well as their forecasted operations. Per ord. 520.15 Subd. 2 (b) (2), if a proposed expansion increases the floor area larger than 50%, then the entire site shall come into compliance. Per ord. 520.15 Subd. 6, Table 11, the minimum number of stalls for ‘Vehicle, Boat or Recreational Sales or Rental’ uses is 4 spaces plus 1 per employee, and any display. In that same Table 11, the minimum number of stalls for ‘Warehouse’ use is 4 spaces plus 1 per 3,000 sq ft. So, the minimum number of spaces is: Boat & Recreational Sales use = 4 + 8 (employees) = 12 stalls + Warehouse use = (32,254 sq ft / 3,000 sq ft) = 10.7, say 11 stalls Total Required = 23 stalls Total Provided = 33 stalls, ok Landscaping and Screening: Deciduous overstory trees along West Broadway and a mix of evergreen and deciduous landscape foundation plantings for the building expansion are included to satisfy landscaping code requirements. Foundation plantings along the existing building near West Broadway will remain. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water: Sanitary sewer service does not change. Storm water currently discharges off site into the large pond across W. Broadway at 5100 Douglas Drive N. We are limiting our impervious surface area to pre-development conditions; however, the < 1 acre of disturbed area is being treated in accordance with storm water regulations of both the City of Crystal and Shingle Creek Watershed. The project is proposing to install a sump structure as well as reduce the amount of pg. 3 impervious surface of the project site to improve the water quality and rate control of the site. A summary of those regulation requirements is attached in the stormwater management memo. Site Lighting: The existing site is lit via wall pack light fixtures on the south and west facades. We are relocating one wall pack light from the south façade to the new overhead door entry on the addition. See Site Lighting Plan. We are also installing a small exit light above the new exit door in the NE corner per building code. FAA Height limits to Crystal Airport: Application has been made to the FAA (filing # 2020-AGL-9321-OE) using FAA Form 7460-1 regarding the proximity to Crystal Airport. The property is approx. 4000 ft (3/4 mile) from the end of the runway. We have received informal approval from the FAA stating that our building height will be approved. They have asked for follow-up information regarding any temporary construction crane heights that may be taller than the building; we are in process of collecting that information and submitting to FAA. We will forward the FAA’s acceptance notice upon receipt. End of Narrative ARCHITECT: EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS 7710 GOLDEN TRIANGLE DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONTACT: ED FARR CIVIL ENGINEER: HTPO 7510 MARKET PLACE DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONTACT: AARON CARRELL OWNER: WATER SPORTS INVESTMENTS LLC 5160 W BROADWAY AVE CRYSTAL, MN 55429 CONTACT: ANDY LARSON LANDSCAPING: HTPO 7510 MARKET PLACE DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONTACT: SARAH HARDING Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 5/26/2020 3:10:29 PMA0.020.011 COVER SHEET Date 16362 XXX MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 5160 W BROADWAY CRYSTAL, MN MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION PROGRESS 5/1/2020 SITE PLAN REVIEW 5/12/2020 CITY REVISIONS 5/26/2020 SHEET INDEX: A0.0 - COVER SHEET C - EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY C1.0 - SITE REMOVALS PLAN C1.1 - SITE PLAN C1.2 - GRADING PLAN C1.3 - STORM SEWER PLAN C1.4 - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L1.0 - LANDSCAPE PLAN A2.1 - FLOOR PLAN A2.2 - ENLARGED EXPANSION PLAN A5.1 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.1 - EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN Attachment E A3 1\2 IPO A3 RLS 48177 A3 FND SPK A3 RLS 48177 STRM E / INLET 869.66 FFE= 874.11 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.18 FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.13 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.09 85.94205.35 14.00 280.97 85.9847.64 24.18 BURLINGTONNORTHERNRAILROADWE S T B RO ADW A Y EXISTING BUILDING 5160 W BROADWAY AVE 1 STORY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5170 W BROADWAY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5140 W BROADWAY AVE CONCRETE C O N C R E T E CONC R E T E CONCRETE BITUMINOUS BITUMINOUS B I T UM I N O U S BITUMINOUS GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVEL GRAVELCONCRETE GRASS GRASS GRASS GRASS CON C R E T E C O N C R E T E C O N C R E T E SMH Rim=873.93 Inv= 863.6 W SMH Rim=873.02 Inv= 863.6 W TNH= 875.72 TNH= 878.32 CB Rim=872.29 Inv= 868.1 W Inv= 868.8 SE CB Rim=872.90 Inv= 868.2 SE Inv= 867.7 W CB Rim=872.26 Inv= 869.1 W Inv= 869.3 E CB Rim=872.17 Inv= 868.9 W Inv= 868.7 E CB Rim=872.54 Inv= 869.8 W CB Rim=872.43 Inv= 869.7 W Inv= 869.9 E DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF CRYSTAL SECURITIES 2ND ADDITION This Area Contains Portable Structures and Storage CONCRETECONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE STOR A G E A R E A N89°40'21"W 562.80 S24°53'58 "E203.54 S89°44'38"E 473.71 S 4 3 ° 1 5 ' 4 3 " E 2 5 5 . 0 3 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF CRYSTAL SECURITIES 2ND ADDITION BENCHMARK #1 BENCHMARK #2 DATE ISSUES / REVISIONSNO.DESIGNDRAWN CHECKED JMB PAT USER: aoppenheimer XREF(s): 20-008-X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-SITE.dwgSCALE: 1 DATE/TIME: May 22, 2020 - 3:51pmFILE: C:\Users\aoppenheimer\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_5392\20-008-X-SUR.dwg LAYOUT: Layout1LIC. NO.DATE: Surveyor 48087 03-31-2020 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Midwest Water Sports CRYSTAL, MN HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO.20-008 SHEET OF 1 HORIZONTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY 103-31-2020 5-19-2020 JMB TLS Added drainage and utility easement to Lot 2 SECTION PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE RIGHT OF WAY CENTER LINE EASEMENT SETBACK BUILDING PAVEMENT GRAVEL CONCRETE BITUMINOUS / ASPHALT FLOW LINE (FL) BACK OF CURB (TC) ROAD CENTER LINE PAVING STRIPES RAILROAD TRACKS CHAIN-LINK FENCE RETAINING WALL DRIP LINE ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEAD UTILITY GAS MAIN WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER STORM DRAINTILE SIGN HANDICAP SYMBOL BOLDARD AIR CONDITIONER POWER POLE GUYWIRE TRANSFORMER ELECTRIC BOX CABLE TV BOX TELEPHONE BOX GAS METER GAS VALVE HYDRANT PIV WATER METER WATER VALVE CURB STOP WATER MANHOLE CATCH BASIN BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN SANITARY MANHOLE POST FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TOP NUT OF HYDRANT CAST IRON PIPE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE DUCTILE IRON PIPE HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE VITRIFIED SEWER PIPE FOUND IRON MONUMENT FFE TNH CIP CMP CPP DIP HDPE PVC RCP VCP VSP LEGEND General Survey Notes 1.All distances are in US survey feet. 2.Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD83-86 Adj). 3.This survey was prepared for the purpose of showing the existing conditions for site improvements. 4.Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station CORVALI MN 053, which has an elevation of 877.666 feet (NAD83) and 2735 AG, witch has an elevation of 880.999 feet (NAD83). Benchmarks for the site are the top nut of hydrants (TNH): #1 North of site on the West side of West Broadway Avenue, which has an elevation of 875.72; #2 South of the site West of West Broadway Avenue, which has an elevation of 878.32. 5.The subsurface utility information in this plan is Utility Quality Level "C". This Utility Quality Level was determined according to the guidelines of CI-ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." 6.There may be easements of record that are not shown hereon. 7.Due to numerous portable items such as boats and storage items, there may be additional improvements that are not shown. VICINITY MAP nts DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 1, Block 1, Crystal Securities 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A3 1\2 IPO A3 RLS 48177 A3 FND SPK A3 RLS 48177 STRM E / INLET 869.66 FFE= 874.11 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.18FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.13 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.09 85.94205.35 14.00 280.97 85.9847.64 24.1 8 BURLINGTONNORTHERNRAILROADWE S T B RO ADW A Y EXISTING BUILDING 5160 W BROADWAY AVE 1 STORY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5170 W BROADWAY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5140 W BROADWAY AVE CONCRETE C O N C R E T E CONC R E T E CONCRETE BITUMINOUS BITUMINOUS B I T U M INO U S BITUMINOUS GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVEL GRAVELCONCRETE GRASS GRASS GRASS GRASS C ON C R E T E C O N C R E T E CO N C R E T E SMH Rim=873.93 Inv= 863.6 W TNH= 875.72 CB Rim=872.29 Inv= 868.1 W Inv= 868.8 SE CB Rim=872.90 Inv= 868.2 SE Inv= 867.7 W CB Rim=872.26 Inv= 869.1 W Inv= 869.3 E CB Rim=872.17 Inv= 868.9 W Inv= 868.7 E CB Rim=872.54 Inv= 869.8 W CB Rim=872.43 Inv= 869.7 W Inv= 869.9 E This Area Contains Portable Structures and Storage CONCRETECONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE STOR A G E A R E A N89°40'21"W 562.80 S24°53'58"E203.54 S89°44'38"E 473.71 S 4 3 ° 1 5 ' 4 3 " E 2 5 5 . 0 3 BENCHMARK #1 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT, TYP. SAWCUT / MATCHLINE, TYP. PROTECT EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING STORM SEWERREMOVE STORM STRUCTURE REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, TYP. REMOVE BOLLARDS REMOVE PERIMETER FENCING ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVAL OF PORTABLE STRUCTURES BY OTHERS PROPERTY LINE, TYP. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP. LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SAWCUT NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT MANUAL, APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 2018 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 2018 MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE LOCATION OF EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESERVING THESE. ANY REPAIRS NECESSARY DUE TO THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS SHALL BE MADE AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. BEFORE DIGGING CALL: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651) 454-0002. 3.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL "D". THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINE FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 4.EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CURB SHALL BE PRESERVED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. CREATE SMOOTH TRANSITIONS BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW BITUMINOUS. ALL ASPHALT SHALL BE SAWCUT, NO JACKHAMMERING. 5.RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING PAVEMENT, TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Civil Engineer Date Reg. No. Aaron Cameron ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 20.011 05/22/2020 56592 MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO.20-008.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 90 USER: aoppenheimer XREF(s): 20-008_x-civ-locn.dwg 20-008-x-sur.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-RMVL.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-TBLK.dwg CERT-ENG - ADC.dwgDATE/TIME: May 22, 2020 - 2:13pmFILE: P:\2020\20-008 - Midwest Water Sports - Crystal\CAD\DWG\PLANSHEETS\CIVIL\20-008_CIV-RMVL.dwg LAYOUT: 001Site Plan Application 05/22/2020 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ! MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO NOTIFY THE REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER AT LEAST TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL www.gopherstateonecall.org 1-800-252-1166 Minnesota SITE REMOVALS PLAN C1.0 A3 1\2 IPO A3 RLS 48177 A3 FND SPK A3 RLS 48177 FFE= 874.11 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.18FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.13 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.09 85.94205.35 14.00 280.97 85.9847.64 24.1 8 BURLINGTONNORTHERNRAILROADWE S T B RO ADW A Y EXISTING BUILDING 5160 W BROADWAY AVE 1 STORY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5170 W BROADWAY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5140 W BROADWAY AVE C O N C R E T E CONC R E T E BITUMINOUS B I T U M INO U S BITUMINOUS GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELCONCRETE GRASS GRASS GRASS C ON C R E T E C O N C R E T E CO N C R E T E SMH Rim=873.93 Inv= 863.6 W TNH= 875.72 TNH= 878.32 CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE BENCHMARK #1 BENCHMARK #2 D BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, TYP. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. PARKING STRIPING, TYP. 9.0' TYP.20.7'TYP.26.5'R5.0 ' R10. 0' EXISTING PARKING STRIPING SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION SEE ARCH PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION PROPERTY LINE, TYP. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.10.9'14.1'10.0'6 3 17 10 LEGEND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BUILDING EXPANSION (SEE ARCH. PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION MATCHLINE PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ! MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO NOTIFY THE REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER AT LEAST TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL www.gopherstateonecall.org 1-800-252-1166 Minnesota NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT MANUAL, APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 2018 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 2018 MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE LOCATION OF EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESERVING THESE. ANY REPAIRS NECESSARY DUE TO THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS SHALL BE MADE AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. BEFORE DIGGING CALL: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651) 454-0002. 3. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL "D". THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINE FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 4. EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CURB SHALL BE PRESERVED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. CREATE SMOOTH TRANSITIONS BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW BITUMINOUS. ALL ASPHALT SHALL BE SAWCUT, NO JACKHAMMERING. 5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING PAVEMENT, TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. BENCHMARKS 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, (NAD83-86 ADJ.) 2. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MN/DOT GEODETIC STATION CORVALI MN 053, WHICH HAS AN ELEVATION OF 877.666 FEET (NAD83) AND 27356 AG, WHICH HAS AN ELEVATION OF 880.999 FEET (NAD 83). BENCHMARKS FOR THE SITE ARE THE TOP OF HYDRANTS (TNH): #1 NORTH OF SITE ON THE WEST SIDE OF WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, EL=875.72; #2 SOUTH OF THE SITE WEST OF WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, EL=878.32. SITE PLAN APPLICATION NOTES 1. ADDRESS: 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL, MN 55429 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CRYSTAL SECURITIES 2ND ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEROF, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 3. ZONING CLASS: I - INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 4. LOT AREA CALCULATION: 95,671 S.F (2.20 ACRES) 5. BUILDING HEIGHT: SEE ARCHITECT PLANS FOR INFORMATION ON BUILDING HEIGHT AND DIMENSIONS 6. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PERCENTAGE = 82.8% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PERCENTAGE = 81.1% 7. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (LOC) = 42,250 SF (0.97 AC) 8. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS WITHIN LOC = 35,285 SF (0.81 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS WITHIN LOC = 33,690 SF (0.77 AC) Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Civil Engineer Date Reg. No. Aaron Cameron ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 20.011 05/22/2020 56592 MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO. 20-008.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 90 USER: aoppenheimer XREF(s): 20-008_x-civ-locn.dwg 20-008-x-sur.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-STRM.dwg 20-008_X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-TBLK.dwg CERT-ENG - ADC.dwgDATE/TIME: May 22, 2020 - 2:13pmFILE: P:\2020\20-008 - Midwest Water Sports - Crystal\CAD\DWG\PLANSHEETS\CIVIL\20-008_CIV-SITE.dwg LAYOUT: 001Site Plan Application 05/22/2020 SITE PLAN C1.1 A3 1\2 IPO A3 RLS 48177 A3 FND SPK A3 RLS 48177 STRM E / INLET 869.66 FFE= 874.11 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.18FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.13 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.09 BURLINGTONNORTHERNRAILROADWE S T B RO ADW A Y EXISTING BUILDING 5160 W BROADWAY AVE 1 STORY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5170 W BROADWAY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5140 W BROADWAY AVE SMH Rim=873.93 Inv= 863.6 W TNH= 875.72 TNH= 878.32 CB Rim=872.29 Inv= 868.1 W Inv= 868.8 SE CB Rim=872.90 Inv= 868.2 SE Inv= 867.7 W CB Rim=872.17 Inv= 868.9 W Inv= 868.7 E CB Rim=872.54 Inv= 869.8 W CB Rim=872.43 Inv= 869.7 W Inv= 869.9 E BENCHMARK #1 BENCHMARK #2 D 880.20 876.90874.75 876.75 881.35 (874.05) (871.40) (873.08) 872.80 (873.77) 872.80 872.90 872.95 876.00 877 8 8 1 8 8 0 79878 873 874875876(870.09) 77 877.10 877.20 GRADE SWALE AT BUILDING PERIMETER ALONG EAST AND SOUTH SIDES PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION FFE VARIES - SEE ARCH PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION GUTTER OUT CURB PROPERTY LINE, TYP. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP. LEGEND PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION SPOT ELEVATION (MATCH EXISTING) DRAINAGE FLOW NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT MANUAL, APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 2018 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 2018 MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE LOCATION OF EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESERVING THESE. ANY REPAIRS NECESSARY DUE TO THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS SHALL BE MADE AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. BEFORE DIGGING CALL: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651) 454-0002. 3.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL "D". THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINE FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING ELEVATIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY PRIOR TO COMMENCING GRADING OPERATIONS. IF DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY AND ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS, NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. 5.RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING PAVEMENT, TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 6.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO TOP OF FINISHED GRADE OR GUTTERLINE ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. BENCHMARKS 1.BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, (NAD83-86 ADJ.) 2.ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MN/DOT GEODETIC STATION CORVALI MN 053, WHICH HAS AN ELEVATION OF 877.666 FEET (NAD83) AND 27356 AG, WHICH HAS AN ELEVATION OF 880.999 FEET (NAD 83). BENCHMARKS FOR THE SITE ARE THE TOP OF HYDRANTS (TNH): #1 NORTH OF STIE ON THE WEST SIDE OF WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, EL=875.72; #2 SOUTH OF THE SITE WEST OF WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, EL=878.32. 872.80 (873.08) 875 Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Civil Engineer Date Reg. No. Aaron Cameron ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 20.011 05/22/2020 56592 MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO.20-008.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 90 USER: aoppenheimer XREF(s): 20-008_x-civ-locn.dwg 20-008-x-sur.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-STRM.dwg 20-008_X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-GRAD.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-TBLK.dwg CERT-ENG - ADC.dwgDATE/TIME: May 22, 2020 - 2:13pmFILE: P:\2020\20-008 - Midwest Water Sports - Crystal\CAD\DWG\PLANSHEETS\CIVIL\20-008_CIV-GRAD.dwg LAYOUT: 001Site Plan Application 05/22/2020 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ! MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO NOTIFY THE REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER AT LEAST TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL www.gopherstateonecall.org 1-800-252-1166 Minnesota GRADING PLAN C1.2 A3 1\2 IPO A3 RLS 48177 A3 FND SPK A3 RLS 48177 STRM E / INLET 869.66 BURLINGTONNORTHERNRAILROADWE S T B RO ADW A Y BITUMINOUS B I T U M INO U S BITUMINOUS GRASS GRASS GRASS SMH Rim=873.93 Inv= 863.6 W TNH= 875.72 TNH= 878.32 CB Rim=872.29 Inv= 868.1 W Inv= 868.8 SE CB Rim=872.90 Inv= 868.2 SE Inv= 867.7 W CB Rim=872.17 Inv= 868.9 W Inv= 868.7 E CB Rim=872.54 Inv= 869.8 W CB Rim=872.43 Inv= 869.7 W Inv= 869.9 E BENCHMARK #1 BENCHMARK #2 D STMH #1 72"Ø RIM=872.26 INV=869.2 S INV=869.2 N,E (EX.) (VERIFY) INV=869.1 W (EX.) (VERIFY) SUMP=865.10 12" PVC SDR26 @ 1.0% CB #2 30" Ø DRAIN BASIN NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL DOME GRATE RIM=876.20 INV=871.06 E INV=869.74 NW CB #3 24" Ø DRAIN BASIN NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL DOME GRATE RIM=875.10 INV=869.77 CB #4 24" Ø DRAIN BASIN NYLOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL DOME GRATE RIM=877.10 INV=870.55 12" PVC SDR26 @ 1.0% 12" RCP CLV @ 0.5% PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION SEE ARCH PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION EXISTING DRAINAGE INLET 12" STORM REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCT NEW STMH OVER EXISTING STORM SEWER FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH ROOF DRAIN CONNECT TO CB #2, SEE MEP PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE, REPLACE GRATE WITH SOLID COVER PROPERTY LINE, TYP. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP. PROPOSED LEGEND STORM STRUCTURE STORM SEWER D NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT MANUAL, APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 2018 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 2018 MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE LOCATION OF EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESERVING THESE. ANY REPAIRS NECESSARY DUE TO THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS SHALL BE MADE AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. BEFORE DIGGING CALL: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651) 454-0002. 3.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL "D". THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINE FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION, AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND BEGIN CONSTRUCTION AT THESE POINTS. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLAN AND EXISTING UTILITIES. NO CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED UNTIL SUCH DISCREPANCIES ARE RESOLVED. 5.THE PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION PROJECT AREA IS LESS THAN 1 AC IN DISTURBANCE. PER SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION, THE PROJECT HAS INCORPORATED PERMANENT WATER QUALITY BMP'S WITH A SUMP STRUCTURE. THE PROJECT DOES NOT TRIGGER QUALITY AND VOLUME REQUIREMENTS. THE DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WILL DECREASE THE RUNOFF RATE FOR THE SITE FOR ALL RAIN EVENTS, AS REQUIRED BY CITY CODE. BENCHMARKS 1.BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, (NAD83-86 ADJ.) 2.ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MN/DOT GEODETIC STATION CORVALI MN 053, WHICH HAS AN ELEVATION OF 877.666 FEET (NAD83) AND 27356 AG, WHICH HAS AN ELEVATION OF 880.999 FEET (NAD 83). BENCHMARKS FOR THE SITE ARE THE TOP OF HYDRANTS (TNH): #1 NORTH OF STIE ON THE WEST SIDE OF WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, EL=875.72; #2 SOUTH OF THE SITE WEST OF WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, EL=878.32. Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Civil Engineer Date Reg. No. Aaron Cameron ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 20.011 05/22/2020 56592 MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO.20-008.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 90 USER: aoppenheimer XREF(s): 20-008_x-civ-locn.dwg 20-008-x-sur.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-STRM.dwg 20-008_X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-TBLK.dwg CERT-ENG - ADC.dwgDATE/TIME: May 22, 2020 - 2:14pmFILE: P:\2020\20-008 - Midwest Water Sports - Crystal\CAD\DWG\PLANSHEETS\CIVIL\20-008_CIV-STRM.dwg LAYOUT: 001Site Plan Application 05/22/2020 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ! MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO NOTIFY THE REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER AT LEAST TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL www.gopherstateonecall.org 1-800-252-1166 Minnesota STORM SEWER PLAN C1.3 S EXISTING LEGEND STORM STRUCTURE STORM SEWER HYDRANT GATE VALVE WATERMAIN SANITARY MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER A3 1\2 IPO A3 RLS 48177 A3 FND SPK A3 RLS 48177 STRM E / INLET 869.66 FFE= 874.11 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.18FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.15 FFE= 874.13 FFE= 874.14 FFE= 874.09 85.94205.35 14.00 280.97 85.9847.64 24.1 8 BURLINGTONNORTHERNRAILROADWE S T B RO ADW A Y EXISTING BUILDING 5160 W BROADWAY AVE 1 STORY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5170 W BROADWAY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5140 W BROADWAY AVE C O N C R E T E CONC R E T E BITUMINOUS B I T U M INO U S BITUMINOUS GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELCONCRETE GRASS GRASS GRASS C ON C R E T E C O N C R E T E CO N C R E T E SMH Rim=873.93 Inv= 863.6 W TNH= 875.72 CB Rim=872.29 Inv= 868.1 W Inv= 868.8 SE CB Rim=872.90 Inv= 868.2 SE Inv= 867.7 W CB Rim=872.17 Inv= 868.9 W Inv= 868.7 E CB Rim=872.54 Inv= 869.8 W CB Rim=872.43 Inv= 869.7 W Inv= 869.9 E CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE BENCHMARK #1 D SW SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AT 25' SPACING ALONG SWALE, TYP.INLET PROTECTION, TYP. INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AROUND BACK OF CURB AFTER CURB CONSTRUCTION, TYP. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. ADJUST AS NEEDED DURING REMOVALS AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASIN STREET SWEEPING AS NEEDED OR DIRECTED BY ENGINEER AND/OR CITY INSTALL SILT FENCE AT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION OF NORTH PROPERTY LINE 877 8 8 1 8 8 0 79878 873 87487587677 PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION SEE ARCH PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION EXISTING DRAINAGE INLET PROPERTY LINE, TYP. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP. LEGEND SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG / SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION STREET SWEEPING ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINAGE FLOW SW NOTES 1.INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. (HAY BALES ARE NOT AN ACCEPTABLE PERIMETER CONTROL). 2.BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION EXIT OR APPROVED EQUAL AT EACH POINT WHERE VEHICLES EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. EXTEND THE ROCK ENTRANCE AT LEAST 50 FEET INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. USE A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BENEATH THE AGGREGATE IN ORDER TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF SOIL INTO THE ROCK FROM BELOW, UNLESS INSTALLED ON PAVEMENT. 3.REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS. REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN TRACKING OCCURS. SWEEPING MAY BE ORDERED BY ENGINEER AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. SWEEPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DONE IN A MANNER TO PREVENT DUST BLOWN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 4.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CATCH BASIN INLETS, WHICH RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREAS. CATCH BASIN INSERTS ARE REQUIRED IN UNDISTURBED AREAS THAT RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS. STAKED SILT FENCE OR OTHER APPROVED BMP'S IN DISTURBED AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO PUBLIC VEHICLE TRAFFIC MAY BE ACCEPTABLE. NOTE: HAY BALES OR FABRIC WRAPPING THE GRATES ARE NOT EFFECTIVE OR AN ACCEPTABLE FORM OF INLET PROTECTION. 5.LOCATE SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL. IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING, VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS. CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT FENCE BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN TWO FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24 HOURS. 6.MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY. 7.TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DENUDED AREAS WHICH HAVE BEEN FINISH-GRADED, AND ALL DENUDED AREAS IN WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN, WIND, AND RUNNING WATER WITHIN 7 DAYS. USE SEEDING AND MULCHING, EROSION CONTROL MATTING, AND/OR SODDING AND STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS. USE EARLY APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON AREAS TO BE PAVED. 8.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC, STRUCTURAL, NON-BIODEGRADABLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. MINIMUM VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT IS 70% COVER. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES UNTIL 70% ESTABLISHED COVER IS ACHIEVED. 9.READY MIXED CONCRETE AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANTS PROHIBITED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. DESIGNATE CONCRETE MIXING/WASHOUT LOCATIONS IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY WASHOUT WATER DRAIN ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR INTO THE PUBLIC STORM SEWER. 10.FOLLOWING INITIAL SOIL DISTURBANCE OR RE-DISTURBANCE, PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS ON ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES, AND ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1); EMBANKMENT OF PONDS, BASINS, AND TRAPS; AND WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS ON ALL OTHER DISTURBED OR GRADED AREAS. THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO THOSE AREAS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND ARE CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR MATERIAL STORAGE OR FOR THOSE AREAS ON WHICH ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE CURRENTLY BEING PERFORMED. 11.SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILS ON TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 12.DEWATERING TURBID WATER SHALL NOT BE DIRECTLY DISCHARGED TO STORM SEWERS. ALL DEWATERING SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY TREATED BY A BMP PRIOR TO EXITING THE SITE. ALL DEWATERING SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OF CRYSTAL CITY CODE STANDARDS. 13.AREA OF LAND DISTURBANCE = 0.970 AC 14.CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT / EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER PROJECT IS CONCLUDED AND PERMITS ARE CLOSED. Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Civil Engineer Date Reg. No. Aaron Cameron ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 20.011 05/22/2020 56592 MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO.20-008.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 90 USER: aoppenheimer XREF(s): 20-008_x-civ-locn.dwg 20-008-x-sur.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-STRM.dwg 20-008_X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-EROS.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-GRAD.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-TBLK.dwg CERT-ENG - ADC.dwgDATE/TIME: May 22, 2020 - 2:14pmFILE: P:\2020\20-008 - Midwest Water Sports - Crystal\CAD\DWG\PLANSHEETS\CIVIL\20-008_CIV-EROS.dwg LAYOUT: 001Site Plan Application 05/22/2020 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ! MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO NOTIFY THE REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER AT LEAST TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL www.gopherstateonecall.org 1-800-252-1166 Minnesota EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN C1.4 877 8 8 1 8 8 0 79878 873 87487587677 BURLINGTONNORTHERNRAILROADWE S T B RO ADW A Y EXISTING BUILDING 5160 W BROADWAY AVE 1 STORY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5170 W BROADWAY EXISTING 1 STORY BUILDING 5140 W BROADWAY AVE C O N C R E T E CONC R E T E BITUMINOUS B I T U M INO U S BITUMINOUS GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELCONCRETEC ON C R E T E C O N C R E T E CO N C R E T E SMH Rim=873.93 Inv= 863.6 W TNH= 875.72 TNH= 878.32 CB Rim=872.29 Inv= 868.1 W Inv= 868.8 SE CB Rim=872.90 Inv= 868.2 SE Inv= 867.7 W CB Rim=872.17 Inv= 868.9 W Inv= 868.7 E CB Rim=872.54 Inv= 869.8 W CB Rim=872.43 Inv= 869.7 W Inv= 869.9 E CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE BENCHMARK #1 BENCHMARK #2 D DL(6) DL(6) TO(5) TO(5) CO(1) UJ(3) CO(2) TA(3) SHOVEL-CUT EDGE SHOVEL-CUT EDGEPROPERTY LINE, TYP. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP. LEGEND SUN/SHADE TURF SEED MIX DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE CONIFEROUS SHRUB DECIDUOUS SHRUB LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISH GRADING AND POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. 2.ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM WITH STATE AND LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS & THE CURRENT ADDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE HEALTHY, HARDY STOCK, AND FREE FROM ANY DISEASES, DAMAGE, AND DISFIGURATION. 3.QUANTITIES OF PLANTS LISTED ON THE PLAN ARE TO GOVERN ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN. PLACE PLANTS IN PROPER SPACING FOLLOWING LAYOUT FIGURES. 4.MAINTAIN (30) INCHES CLEARANCE AROUND PARKING STALLS TO ALLOW OVERHANG OF PARKED CARS. 5.APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN FOUR (4) FOOT DIAMETER RING AROUND ALL TREES IN TURF AREA. 6.APPLY PRE-EMERGENT TO MULCH IN PLANTING AREAS TO PROHIBIT WEED GROWTH, APPLICATION RATE TO BE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. IF WEEDS APPEAR IN TREATED AREAS DURING THE FIRST YEAR, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL WEEDS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. 7.PLANTING SOIL FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES IN DEPTH. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE WELL-GRADED SOIL, FRIABLE AND FERTILE, FREE OF HARDPACK SUBSOIL, STONES AND NOXIOUS WEEDS, AND HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.5 AND 7.5. PLANTING SOIL TO BE A MIXTURE OF SELECTED TOPSOIL BORROW (MNDOT 3877 TYPE B) PEAT MOSS OR COMPOSTED YARD WASTE AND FERTILIZER, MIXING PROPORTIONS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO LOOSE VOLUME RATIO AND HAVE A COMPOSITE ORGANIC CONTENT AT NO LESS THAN 15% AND NO GREATER THAN 20%. FERTILIZER SHALL BE SLOW RELEASE COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER AND ADDED IN SUFFICIENT QUANTITY TO PROVIDE 0.05 POUND OF TOTAL NITROGEN PER CUBIC YARD OF PLANTING SOIL. 8.FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PLANTS AND SOD IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUT ONE YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL BEGIN UPON INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BY CITY STAFF. 10.ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3-4" MULCH COVER. 11.FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, REFER TO CIVIL PLANS. PLANT SCHEDULE: Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Date Reg. No. ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 20.011 05/22/2020 MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO.20-008.1 SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 90 Landscape Architect Sarah Harding 45592 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota USER: aoppenheimer XREF(s): 20-008_x-civ-locn.dwg 20-008-x-sur.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-SITE.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-STRM.dwg 20-008_X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-008_X-LAN.dwg 20-008_X-ARC-TBLK.dwg 20-008_X-CIV-GRAD.dwg CERT-ENG - ADC.dwgDATE/TIME: May 22, 2020 - 2:14pmFILE: P:\2020\20-008 - Midwest Water Sports - Crystal\CAD\DWG\PLANSHEETS\CIVIL\20-008_LAN-PLN.dwg LAYOUT: 001Site Plan Application 05/22/2020 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ! MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO NOTIFY THE REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER AT LEAST TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL www.gopherstateonecall.org 1-800-252-1166 Minnesota LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0 SYMBOL COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME QTY.CONT.SPACING NOTES EVERGREEN TREES + SHRUBS TO EMERALD ARBORVITAE THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'SMARAGD'10 #15 CONT.15'H x 3-4'W DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREES + SHRUBS CO HACKBERRY CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS 3 3" BB 50-75'H x 50'W TA AMERICAN LINDEN TILIA AMERICANA 3 3" BB 40-50'H 40'W UJ ACCOLADE ELM ULMUS JAPONICA X WILSONIANA 'MORTON'3 3" BB 70'H x 40-50'W DL DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE DIERVILLA LONICERA 12 #5 CONT.4' OC 3-4'H x 3'W 1 2 3 4 A B C.1 E F G.1 H J K L M N P Q R S C D E.1 G 31' - 2" 23' - 8" 31' - 2" 20' - 6" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 7' - 6" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 12' - 0" 30' - 0" 25' - 0" 25' - 0" 25' - 0" 20' - 6" 7' - 6" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0"O.H. DOOREXISTING BUILDING BOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOAT RACK BOAT RACK SERVICE AND PARTS EXISTING STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE OFFICESRESTROOMS COLUMN CENTERLINES OVERHEAD CRANE RAIL 99' - 7 3/4"30' - 10 7/8"248' - 1 1/8"82' - 5 3/4"SHOWROOM 32,254 SQ FT BOAT STORAGE ADDITION Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 5/26/2020 3:10:31 PMA2.120.011 FLOOR PLAN Date 16362 XXX MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 SCALE:1" = 20'-0"A2.1 1 FLOOR 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN REVIEW 5/12/2020 N BOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOAT RACK BOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOATRACKBOAT RACK BOAT RACK FORKLIFT WITH 20' BOAT PICKUP TRUCK HAULING BOAT WITHIN A 45' TURNING RADIUS COLUMN CENTERLINES OVERHEAD CRANE RAIL Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 5/26/2020 3:10:32 PMA2.220.011 ENLARGED EXPANSION PLAN Date 16362 XXX MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 SCALE:3/32" = 1'-0"A2.2 1 EXPANSION FLOOR PLAN SITE PLAN REVIEW 5/12/2020 A B C.1 E F G.1 H J K L M N P Q R SCDE.1 G 58' - 0"STANDING SEAM PREFINISHED METAL ROOF EXISTING MASONRY W/ ROUGH TEXTURE (7) DOWNSPOUTS 40' O.C. PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL SIDING 10' - 0" 19' - 0" 10' - 0" 14' - 8 1/2" 19' - 0" 21' - 0" 19' - 0" 21' - 0" 19' - 0" 21' - 0" 19' - 0" 21' - 0" 19' - 0" 21' - 0" 19' - 0" 14' - 3 1/2" 1234 22' - 4" 35' - 8"51' - 2 1/4"58' - 0"EXISTING MASONRY WITH ROUGH TEXTURE PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL SIDING EQ EQ ABC.1EFG.1HJKLMNPQRS CDE.1G 32' - 4" 3' - 4"14' - 7 3/4" 6' - 8 1/4" EXISTING MASONRY W/ ROUGH TEXTURE PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL SIDING 37' - 0" 20' - 4 1/4" 13' - 0"20' - 0 3/8"13' - 0"15' - 0"18' - 0"26' - 6 5/8"18' - 0"26' - 6 5/8"18' - 0"15' - 0" 1 2 3 4 EXISTING MASONRY WITH ROUGH TEXTURE PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL SIDING 20' - 0 1/4" 20' - 0 1/4" 20' - 0 1/4" 20' - 0 1/4"20' - 10" 20' - 10 3/8" 20' - 10 3/8" 20' - 10" Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 5/26/2020 3:10:34 PMA5.120.011 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Date 16362 XXX MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0"A5.1 4 SOUTH SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0"A5.1 2 EAST SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0"A5.1 1 NORTH SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0"A5.1 3 WEST SITE PLAN REVIEW 5/12/2020 CITY REVISIONS 5/26/2020 BURLINGTON NORTHERNRAILROAD2 N DW BROADWAY AVENUE17 5 1 3 248' - 1 1/8" 10 EXISTING WALL PACK LIGHTS ON EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED WALL PACK LIGHT OVER PROPOSED MANDOOR (XTOR1B) PROPOSED WALL PACK LIGHT ABOVE PROPOSED OVERHEAD DOOR (XTOR4B) 0.2 fc 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.2 fc 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.1 fc 0.5 fc Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2020 Location 5/28/2020 10:57:39 AMA6.120.011 EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN Date 16362 XXX MIDWEST WATER SPORTS EXPANSION 5160 W BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL MN 55429 SITE PLAN REVIEW 5/12/2020 CITY REVISIONS 5/26/2020 SCALE:1" = 30'-0"A6.1 1 EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN 0.05 fc 1.0 fc UDC AMENDMENTS PAGE 1 OF 3 ___________________________________________________________________________ FROM: Dan Olson, City Planner TO: Planning Commission (for June 8 meeting) DATE: June 3, 2020 RE: PUBLIC HEARING. Miscellaneous amendments to the Unified Development Code (Application Number 2020-04) __________________________________________________________________________ A. BACKGROUND Staff is proposing miscellaneous amendments to the unified development code (UDC). The proposed amendments are corrections or clarifications, with the exception of two policy questions:  Minimum lot size. Reduce the minimum lot area requirement for two-family dwellings from 12,000 sq. ft. to 10,000 sq. ft.  Per-unit requirements. Eliminate the per-unit requirements from the minimum lot size requirements. The per-unit requirements are effectively a density standard that is not necessary because density is limited elsewhere in the UDC. At their work session on May 19, 2020, the City Council expressed their support for staff to bring these amendments to a public hearing and ask for a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Attachment: A. Proposed UDC amendments B. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Lot area requirements. 1. Reduce the minimum lot area for two-family homes from 12,000 to 10,000 sq. ft.:  The current 12,000 sq. ft. minimum is the same as two single family lots (2 x 6,000 = 12,000).  The policy rationale is that a two-family dwelling does not need as much lot area as two separate single family lots, because two attached units do not have side yards between them like two single family homes on separate lots. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Miscellaneous UDC amendments UDC AMENDMENTS PAGE 2 OF 3  This change would provide an opportunity for more property owners to respond to market demand for additional housing units while still preserving the overall character of neighborhoods in the R-1 district. The effect of this change would increase approximate share of R-1 parcels eligible for a two- family dwelling from 10% to 15%. Requirement Crystal Golden Valley Robbinsdale New Hope Brooklyn Center Minimum Lot Area for Two-Family Dwellings in R-1 12,000 SF 10,000 SF Two-family not allowed in R-1 Two-family not allowed in R-1 Two-family not allowed in R-1 Two-family not allowed in R-1 Minimum Lot Area for Two-Family Dwellings in R-2 12,000 SF 10,000 SF 10,000 SF 7,500 SF 12,000 SF(two stacked units) 10,000 SF (two units side by side) 12,400 SF Minimum Lot Area for Two-Family Dwellings in R-3 12,000 SF 10,000 SF 15,000 SF 7,500 SF 10,000 SF (two units side by side) Two-family not allowed in R-3 2. Remove the per-unit requirements from the minimum lot area requirement and reduce the minimum lot size.  The effect of this change would be to eliminate a duplicative density limit that will typically be stricter than the density limit elsewhere in the code. For example, the vacant site at 3401-3415 Douglas could have up to 16 units based on the density limit in the code but only 10 units based on the per-unit requirement for the minimum lot size. The higher density (16) is consistent with the city’s Comprehensive Plan; the lower density (10) is not.  The policy rationale is to remove a second, conflicting density requirement from a place it doesn’t belong (the lot size requirement) and bring the UDC into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. It would also simplify the lot size requirement. Requirement Crystal Golden Valley Robbinsdale New Hope Brooklyn Center Minimum Lot Area for Other Residential Uses in R-2 3,000 SF per unit (minimum 10,000 SF) Other residential uses not allowed 4,200 SF per townhome unit 15,000 SF Range of 1,400 SF- 5,400 SF per unit Minimum Lot Area for Other Residential Uses in R-3 1,200 SF per unit (minimum 20,000 SF) 10,000 SF 15-20,000 SF 500-1,500 SF per apt unit, 4,200 SF per townhome unit 15,000 SF Range of 1,400 SF- 5,400 SF per unit UDC AMENDMENTS PAGE 3 OF 3 Other UDC amendments 1. Final plat recording. Language has been added to clarify when a final plat is to be recorded for both lot consolidation and subdivision applications. 2. Density requirements in TC and TC-PD overlay district. The effective maximum density is 80 units per acre in the TC district and 64 units per acre in the TC-PD district. The text has been simplified to eliminate unnecessary and duplicative language regarding height limits which are regulated elsewhere in the code. 3. Use standards for specialized care facilities. The current requirement limits this use to arterial, collector and state-aid streets. The UDC was previously amended to regulate this use by the number of occupants of the facility rather than its location. This amendment is to clarify that the use does not have to be located on a specific type of street. 4. Telecommunication ordinance (cell towers). Staff proposes re-organizing the requirements to make them easier to understand. The most significant changes are to replace minimum lot size requirements with separation distance requirements, based on comments received at the public hearing for the new Verizon tower at 3200 Vera Cruz. Staff also proposes removing exceptions for placing a tower in the front or corner side yard of a property. Changing this requirement is consistent with best practices in the industry. If a particular site has unique characteristics or challenges that require a tower between the building and a public street, then the variance process is an available remedy. 5. Encroachment table. This amendment is to delete deck setback requirements inadvertently placed in the encroachment table. 6. Height of detached accessory dwelling units (ADU). Currently a detached ADU cannot exceed 20’ or the height of the home, whichever is less. The amendment would increase the numerical limit to 22’ and eliminate the limit based on the height of the principal building. This is necessary for two story ADUs, including ADUs located on the second floor of a detached garage, due to the practical realities of the building code and structural elements such as floor truss thickness and insulation requirements. This height limit would be consistent with other cities that allow two story ADUs. 7. Number of parking spaces for preschools. Currently there is no specific parking requirement for preschools. Staff proposes that preschools have the same required number of parking spaces as elementary and middle schools. 8. Stormwater plan. This amendment corrects an internal inconsistency in the stormwater management regulations as to when a stormwater plan is to be submitted. C. REQUESTED ACTION The Planning Commission is being asked to make a recommendation to the City Council to either deny or approve the proposed UDC amendments. Staff recommends approval of the amendments. The following is the proposed schedule for adopting a new ordinance: June 16 Council considers first reading of ordinance July 21 Council considers second reading and adoption July 30 Summary of ordinance published August 29 Effective date of ordinance 16 Figure 3: Illustration showing yards for through lot Subd. 99. Lot line, rear. “Lot line, rear” means the lot line not intersecting a front lot line that is most distant from and most closely parallel to the front lot line. Subd. 100. Lot line, side. “Lot line, side” means any lot line that is not a front, rear or corner side lot line. Subd. 101. Lot line, corner side. “Lot line, corner side” means any street-abutting lot line that is not a front or rear lot line. Subd. 102. Lot of record. “Lot of record” means land designated as a separate and distinct parcel in a subdivision, the plat of which has been recorded in the office of the recorder of Hennepin County, Minnesota; or a parcel of land, the deed to which was recorded in the office of the recorder or registrar of titles of Hennepin County, Minnesota prior to the adoption of the ordinance codified in this UDC. Subd. 103. Lot width. “Lot width” means the horizontal distance between side lot lines. In the case of irregularly shaped lots located on a cul-de-sac or curved street, or corner lots that are neither a square, rectangle, or parallelogram, lot width shall be measured at the required front and rear setback lines. Subd. 104. Lowest floor. “Lowest floor” means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage in an area other than a basement area, is not considered a building’s lowest floor; provided, that such enclosure is not built so as to render the building in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirements of 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60.3. Subd. 105. Manufactured home. “Manufactured home” has the meaning given in Minnesota Statutes, section 327.31. The term “manufactured home” does not include the term “recreational vehicle.” Attachment A 44 Subd 5. Deed consolidation. Upon approval of any adjacent parcel land conveyance pursuant to the terms of this section, the applicant shall record with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles an updated deed which combines the legal descriptions for the original lot and that part of the adjacent parcel which has been conveyed to the applicant pursuant to this section. The applicant shall provide the city with evidence of the recording of such instrument within 30 days of approval of such application hereunder. 510.23. Lot consolidation. Subd. 1. Applicability. A lot consolidation shall meet the following requirements. If these requirements are not met, the property owner will be required to apply for a subdivision application as provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 510.25. (a) All parcels resulting from the lot consolidation shall have frontage and access on an existing improved street and shall not require the construction of any new street. (b) Any such consolidation shall not require any public improvements, with the exception of sidewalks, bike paths or trails, and does not include conveyance of an interest in real property to the city. Subd. 2. Approval procedure. (a) Lot consolidations shall be submitted in writing to the zoning administrator and shall be subject to the Type 3 review procedure. The city council will consider approval of a final plat as part of that review procedure. (b) In addition to the review procedure set forth above, all lot consolidation applications shall be submitted to the state and county highway departments (if adjacent to a state or county highway) prior to submission of an application. A comment letter from these entities shall be required as part of the application. Subd. 3. Approval criteria. All of the following criteria shall be considered in the review of lot consolidations: (a) The consolidation must be in general compliance with the comprehensive plan; (b) The consolidation must meet the purpose and intent of this UDC; (c) Unless prior or concurrent approval of a variance is granted, any such consolidation shall result in lots that, to the greatest extent possible, meet the dimensional requirements for the zoning district in which the property is located, and shall not further increase the nonconformity of any lot dimension or structure; and (d) The applicant is not required to comply with the park dedication requirements as provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 525.05 as required for a subdivision. Subd. 4. Effect of the city council’s decision. Except for minor corrections, no changes, erasures, modifications or revisions shall be made to any final plat after approval has been given by the city council and endorsed by the mayor and city clerk in writing on the plat. Within six months of approval of the final plat by the City Council the applicant shall submit the plat for 45 recording to the county recorder. If the plat is not submitted to the county recorder within six months, the city council’s approval of the final plat shall be automatically revoked. 510.25. Subdivisions. Subd. 1. Applicability. The review of a subdivision is divided into two distinct steps, which are preliminary plat approval and final plat approval consistent with Minnesota Statutes, chapter 505. Subd. 2. Preliminary plat approval. (a) Approval procedure. Preliminary plats shall be submitted in writing to the zoning administrator and shall be subject to the Type 2 review procedure. (b) State and county review. In addition to the review procedure set forth above, all preliminary plat applications shall be submitted to the state and county highway departments (if adjacent to a state or county highway) prior to submission of an application. A comment letter from these entities shall be required as part of the preliminary plat submission. (c) Approval criteria. The planning commission and city council shall consider the following criteria in the review of a preliminary plat: (1) The proposed subdivision must be in full compliance with the provisions of this UDC; (2) The proposed subdivision must be in accordance with the objectives of the city’s comprehensive plan; and (3) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and sedimentation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention, must be such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated; (d) Effect of the city council’s decision. No construction or other development activities shall take place on the site until the final plat and, if applicable, a development agreement are approved by the city council, except that grading may occur if a grading permit has been issued by the city. (e) Expiration of preliminary plat approval. Unless the city council specifically approves a different time period as part of the preliminary plat approval, the approval of a preliminary plat shall expire one year from the date it was approved. The applicant may request an extension of the expiration date in writing to the zoning administrator. The city council may approve one extension of not more than two years. Such written request shall include the following: (1) An explanation for why a final plat has not been applied for; (2) An explanation of what, if any, good faith efforts have been made to complete the platting process; and 46 (3) The anticipated completion date. Subd. 3. Construction drawings approval. Construction drawings for any proposed installation of public infrastructure shall be submitted to the city engineer at the time of the final plat submission. These drawings must be approved by the city engineer as part of the final plat approval. Subd. 4. Final plat approval. (a) Approval procedure. Final plats shall be submitted in writing to the zoning administrator and shall be subject to the Type 3 review procedure. (b) Approval criteria. The city council shall consider the following in the review of a final plat: (1) Construction drawings have been submitted to, reviewed and approved by the city engineer; (2) If applicable, a development agreement in a form acceptable to the city must have been prepared and executed as part of the final plat application; (3) Whether the final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat and any conditions on the preliminary plat approval, and whether any changes of note were reported to the city council; and (4) The final plat must comply with all other applicable standards in this UDC and state law including Minnesota Statutes, chapter 505 as applicable. (c) Effect of the city council’s decision. If the final plat is approved and signed by the mayor and city clerk, the applicant shall record the final plat within six months with the county recorder. Except for minor corrections, No no changes, erasures, modifications or revisions shall be made to any final plat after approval has been given by the city council and endorsed by the mayor and city clerk in writing on the plat. Within six months of approval of the final plat by the city council the applicant shall submit the plat to the county recorder for recording. If the plat is not recorded withsubmitted to the county recorder within six months, the city council’s approval of the final plat shall be automatically revoked. 510.27. Comprehensive plan amendment. Subd. 1. Applicability. This subsection outlines the procedural requirements for the amendment of the comprehensive plan. An amendment of the comprehensive plan may be initiated by the city council, planning commission, city staff, or a Crystal property owner. Subd. 2. Approval procedure. Amendments to the comprehensive plan shall be subject to the Type 2 review procedure. Subd. 3. Approval criteria. The planning commission and city council shall review the necessary submittal requirements, facts, and circumstances of the proposed amendment and make 53 subsection. The requirements of subsections (d) and (e) of this subdivision are only applicable to new buildings constructed after the effective date of this UDC. (c) Uses. Principal permitted uses are shown in Table 3 of the Crystal city code, section 515.17. Multiple principal uses within a single parcel or building are permitted in the TC district. (d) Densities. Residential densities are as shown in Table 7 of the Crystal city code, section 520.03. An applicant may exceed these densities by up to 60 percent if the building height requirements of this section are met. (e) Site development standards. In addition to the following standards established for the TC district, all development shall be subject to applicable standards as provided in Crystal city code, section 520. The TC district also includes specific standards for building placement, height, and facades in order to encourage development that enhances walkability and the pedestrian experience, frames the public realm, and seamlessly transitions to adjacent development. (1) Building placement. Principal buildings shall meet the building setback requirements found in Table 7. The purpose of these requirements is to create buildings that have the dominant lines of their facades parallel the line of the street and create a well-defined street edge. (a) At intersections, buildings shall have street facades at or near the sidewalk at the corner (see Figure 6) Figure 6: Illustration of a building that meets both corners at a street intersection (b) Building street frontage. At least 75 percent of the building street frontage shall be occupied by the principal building on a primary building façade or at least 50% for a secondary building façade (see Figure 7). The following are exceptions to these requirements: (i) The city may consider a reduction to 60 percent to the building street frontage requirement on a primary building façade based on the unique 77 (iii) Hospitals (iv) Private recreational facilities, indoor (v) Public or semi-public buildings, with a conditional use permit (vi) Religious institutions, with a conditional use permit (vii) Schools, elementary or secondary, with a conditional use permit (viii) Schools, nursery or preschool, with a conditional use permit (ix) Schools, trade or business, with a conditional use permit (x) Specialized care facilities (2) Accessory uses. All permitted accessory uses allowed in the TC district in Table 4 are also allowed in the TC-PD district. The following additional accessory uses are also allowed in the TC-PD district. Unless otherwise noted, all uses are allowed without a conditional use permit, but whether the use is permitted or conditional, it shall adhere to any required use-specific standards. (i) Drive-through facilities, with a conditional use permit (ii) Fences (iii) Garages (iv) Porches and decks (v) Signs, under the same requirements as the TC district (3) Temporary uses. All permitted temporary uses in Table 5 are allowed in the TC- PD district. The use shall comply with any time limits, required permits, and use specific-standards listed in that table. (b) Densities. Residential densities shall be constructed to a density of 16 to 40 64 units per gross acre. An applicant may exceed these densities by up to 60 percent if the building height requirements of the TC-PD district are met. (c) Building design. All new buildings within the TC-PD district shall adhere to the TC district site development standards for building placement, height and facades in the Crystal city code, section 515.05, subd. 5. (d) Parking. The development shall provide parking according to the requirements in the Crystal city code, section 520.15, subd. 6. If the applicant desires to alter the number of required parking spaces through the TC-PD approval process, the following information shall be submitted: 86 (1) The facility is served by arterial, collector or municipal state aid streets and such pedestrian facilities as are necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the facility; and (2) Drive-through facilities are specifically prohibited. Subd. 4. Commercial use category. (a) Airport facilities. Airport facilities are subject to the following standards: (1) Adequate controls, such as fencing, shall be provided to prevent unauthorized access onto airport property; (2) Buildings and uses shall be subordinate to the operation of the Crystal Airport; and (3) Buildings or structures shall comply with all federal and state statutes, regulations, rules, laws, restrictions, guidance and directives and Metropolitan Airports Commission rules and regulations concerning aeronautical safety and operation within the Crystal Airport and runway protection zones. (b) Animal hospitals/veterinary clinics. Except in the TC district, outdoor facilities, such as dog kennels or runs, are allowed with a conditional use permit and are subject to the following standards: (1) Such use shall be incidental to the animal hospital use and used for the short-term boarding of animals; and (2) The applicant has demonstrated that the outdoor facility will not negatively impact neighboring properties through the use of screening or buffering. (c) Day care facilities, Adult. Picking up and dropping off of clients shall not create unsafe conditions. Loading and unloading of clients from vehicles shall only be allowed in the driveway or in an approved parking area. (d) Hotels, motels, or extended stay establishments. The property abuts at least one of the following street segments: (1) Lakeland Avenue between the Canadian Pacific Railroad and 58th Avenue North; or (2) West Broadway between Corvallis Avenue and 56th Avenue North. (e) Kennels, commercial. Outdoor facilities, such as dog kennels or runs, are allowed with a conditional use permit and are subject to the following standards: (1) Such use shall be for the short-term boarding of animals; (2) The applicant has demonstrated that the outdoor facility will not negatively impact neighboring properties through the use of screening or buffering. (f) Offices, professional. Professional offices are subject to the following standards: 91 By this subsection, the city intends to exercise the full scope of its authority under the Act and under state law regarding the regulation of towers and telecommunications facilities in the city. Consistent with the Act, the regulation of towers and telecommunications facilities in the city will not have the effect of prohibiting any person from providing wireless telecommunications services. (2) Purpose. The general purpose of this subsection is to regulate the placement, construction and modification of telecommunication towers and facilities in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public, while not unreasonably interfering with the development of the competitive wireless telecommunications marketplace in the city. Specifically, the purposes of this subsection are: (i) To regulate the location of telecommunication towers and facilities; (ii) To protect residential areas and land uses from potential adverse impacts of telecommunication towers and facilities; (iii) To minimize adverse visual impacts of telecommunication towers and facilities through design, siting, landscaping, and innovative camouflaging techniques; (iv) To promote and encourage shared use and co-location of telecommunication towers and antenna support structures; (v) To avoid potential damage to properties caused by telecommunication towers and facilities by ensuring that those structures are soundly and carefully designed, constructed, modified, maintained and promptly removed when no longer used or when determined to be structurally unsound; (vi) To ensure that telecommunication towers and facilities are compatible with surrounding land uses; and (vii) To facilitate the provision of wireless telecommunications services to the residents and businesses of the city in an orderly fashion. (3) Development of towersZoning districts where towers are allowed. (i) Permitted use at certain locations in the Industrial district (I). A tower is a permitted use in the I district, with approval of a zoning certificate, provided that the site also meets one of the following additional location criteria: (A) It abuts the Canadian Pacific railroad property and also abuts Pennsylvania Avenue, 32nd Avenue or Nevada Avenue; or (B) It is located within the area bounded by Corvallis Avenue, West Broadway, Douglas Drive, 56th Avenue, and Lakeland Avenue/Bottineau Boulevard. (ii) Conditional use at certain locations in the Commercial district (C). A tower is a conditional use in the C general commercial district provided that the site is 93 (v) Written evidence from an engineer that the proposed structure meets the structural requirements of this UDC. (vi) Written information demonstrating the need for the tower at the proposed site in light of the existing and proposed wireless telecommunications network(s) to be operated by persons intending to place telecommunications facilities on the tower. (5) Review criteria and restrictions. (i) In considering an application where the provider has shown the existence of a significant gap in coverage, the city council shall only authorize a tower if the city makes a finding that such a location is necessary for the city to achieve compliance with the requirements of the Act. (ii) The city council makes a finding that the design of the tower, including factors such as shape, materials, and finishes, adequately uses stealth techniques to minimize its impact on the character of the surrounding area. (iii) The site must comply with the following minimum area requirements: (A) If zoned commercial or industrial then the site shall contain no less than two acres. (B) If zoned residential then the site shall contain no less than five acres. (C) Notwithstanding (i) and (ii) above, regardless of zoning, if the principal use on the site is a city structure, county building, school, or church, then the site shall contain no less than three acres. (D) For the purposes of determining site area for this particular provision, contiguous lots owned by the same entity shall be considered a single site. (iv) No tower shall be located within 660 feet (1/8 mile) of another tower. (v) No tower shall be located on a lot having as its principal use a one or two family dwelling. (vi) No part of the tower shall be located within 165 feet (1/32 mile) of any one or two family dwelling on another lot or within 82.5 feet (1/64 mile) of any lot line. This provision shall not prohibit the subsequent expansion of a dwelling which reduces the distance from a tower to the dwelling, even if such expansion causes the tower to become non-conforming to the setback requirement. (vii) The height of the tower shall not exceed 100 feet, or 50% of the distance from any part of the tower to the nearest lot line of an adjacent property having a single family or two family dwelling, whichever is less. 94 (viii)(iii) The city may authorize the use of city property, including use of its right-of-way pursuant to chapter 8 of the Crystal city code in accordance with the procedures and subject to the restrictions of this code. (6) Co-location required. Unless the applicant presents clear and convincing evidence to the city council that co-location at the identified site is not structurally or technically feasible, a new tower may not be built, constructed or erected in the city unless the tower is capable of supporting at least one telecommunications facility comparable in weight, size and surface area to the one located on the tower by the applicant. (7) Setbacks Locational requirements. (i) A tower must be located on a single parcel or contiguous parcels under the same ownership as the applicant having a dimension equal to the height of the tower, as measured between the base of the tower located nearest the property line and the actual property line, unless a qualified engineer specifies in writing that the collapse of the tower will occur within a lesser distance under reasonably foreseeable circumstances. (ii) Unless otherwise required by this subsection, Setbacklocational requirements for towers are measured from the base of the tower to the property line of the parcel on which it is located. (iii) Towers may not be located between a principal structure and a public street, . with the following exceptions: (A) In the I district, towers may be placed within a side yard abutting an internal industrial street. (B) On sites adjacent to public streets on all sides, towers may be placed within a side yard abutting a local street. (C) This requirement does not apply to towers that are a conditional use in all zoning districts. (iv) No tower shall be located within 660 feet of another tower. (v) No tower shall be located on a lot having as its principal use a one or two family dwelling. (vi) Towers are subject to the following locational requirements from residential uses: (A) Towers in the I district shall be separated from all properties used for residential purposes by a minimum of 90 feet or 150% of the height of the proposed tower, whichever is greater. The minimum tower separation distance shall be calculated and applied irrespective of city jurisdictional boundaries. Measurement of tower separation distances for compliance with this 95 requirement shall be measured from the base of a tower to the closest point of the proposed site. (B) Where towers are a conditional use, no part of the tower shall be located within 165 feet of any one or two family dwelling. This provision shall not prohibit the subsequent expansion of a dwelling which reduces the distance from a tower to the dwelling, even if such expansion causes the tower to become non-conforming to this locational requirement. (6) Structural requirements. Towers must be designed and certified by an engineer to be structurally sound and, at minimum, in conformance with the international state building code and any other standards set forth in this subsection. (7) Height. Towers are subject to the following height requirements: (A) Tower height is measured from grade and includes the tower structure itself, the base pad, and any other telecommunication facilities attached thereto. If a lightning rod is included in the structure, the lightning rod is not included in the height calculation, but shall not exceed ten feet in height. (B) A tower may not exceed 165 feet in height in the commercial or industrial zoning districts, 100 feet in residential districts, or 50% of the distance from any part of the tower to the nearest lot line of an adjacent property having a single or two family dwelling, whichever is less. (8) Separation or buffer requirements. Towers must be separated from all properties used for residential purposes by a minimum of 90 feet or 150% of the height of the proposed tower, whichever is greater. The minimum tower separation distance shall be calculated and applied irrespective of city jurisdictional boundaries. Measurement of tower separation distances for the purpose of compliance with this subsection shall be measured from the base of a tower to the closest point of the proposed site. This requirement does not apply to towers that are a conditional use in a zoning district. (9) Method of determining tower height. Measurement of tower height must include the tower structure itself, the base pad, and any other telecommunications facilities attached thereto. Tower height is measured from grade. (10)(8) Illumination. Towers may not be artificially lighted except as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). At time of construction of a tower, in cases where there are residential uses located within a distance from the tower which is 3 times the height of the tower, dual mode lighting must be requested from the FAA. Notwithstanding this provision, the city may approve the placement of an antenna on an existing or proposed lighting standard, provided that the antenna is integrated with the lighting standard. (11)(9) Exterior finish. Towers not requiring FAA painting or marking must have an exterior finish as approved by the city council if a conditional use permit is required or by city staff if a zoning certificate is required. 96 (12)(10) Fencing. Fences constructed around or upon parcels containing towers, antenna support structures, or telecommunications facilities must be constructed in accordance with the applicable fencing requirements in the zoning district where it is located, unless more stringent fencing requirements are required by FCC regulations or different requirements are allowed by the city council through approval of the conditional use permit. (13) (11) Landscaping. Landscaping on parcels containing towers, antenna support structures or telecommunications facilities must be in accordance with the applicable landscaping requirements of this UDC and as shown on the approved site plan. Utility buildings and structures accessory to a tower must be architecturally designed to blend in with the surrounding environment and to meet such setback requirements as are compatible with the actual placement of the tower. Ground mounted equipment must be screened from view by suitable vegetation, except where a design of non-vegetative screening better reflects and complements the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Accessory buildings may not be more than 2,000 square feet in size. (12) Security. Towers must be reasonably posted and secured to protect against trespass. (13) Access. Parcels upon which towers are located must provide access during normal business hours to at least one paved vehicular parking space on site. (14) StealthTower and equipment design. To the extent reasonably practical, towers must be of stealth design. Equipment that is accessory to the tower shall be screened from view or architecturally designed to blend in with the surrounding environment and shall not exceed 2,000 square feet in size. (15) Other telecommunications facilities. Telecommunications facilities not attached to a tower may be permitted as an accessory use to any antenna support structure at least 50 feet and no more than 100 feet in height regardless of the zoning restrictions applicable. The owner of such structure must, by written certification to the building official, establish the following facts at the time plans are submitted for a building permit: (i) That the height from grade of the telecommunications facilities and antennae support structure does not exceed the maximum height from grade of permitted structures by more than 20 feet; (ii) That the antenna support structure and telecommunications facilities comply with the state building code; and (iii) That any telecommunications facilities and their appurtenances, located above the primary roof of an antenna support structure, are set back one foot from the edge of the primary roof for each one foot in height above the primary roof of the antenna support structure. This setback requirement does not apply to antennas that are mounted to the exterior of antenna support structures below the primary roof and do not protrude more than six inches from the side of the 97 antenna support structure. Screened telecommunications facilities and their appurtenances are exempt from setback requirements. (16) Existing towers. (i) An existing tower may be modified or demolished and rebuilt to accommodate co-location of additional telecommunications facilities as follows: (A) Application for an appropriate city permit shall be made to the city council; and (B) The total height of the modified tower and telecommunications facilities attached thereto shall not exceed the maximum height for towers allowed under this subsection. (ii) A tower that is being rebuilt to accommodate the co-location of additional telecommunications facilities may be relocated on the same parcel subject to the setback locational requirements of this subsection. However, if it is impossible for the tower to be rebuilt in compliance with the those setback requirements of this subsection, such setback requirements shall be waived to allow the tower to be rebuilt in its exact previous location. (14)(17) Abandoned or unused towers or portions of towers. Abandoned or unused towers and associated above-ground facilities must be removed within six months of the cessation of operations of an antenna facility at the site unless an extension is approved by the zoning administrator. A copy of the relevant portions of a signed lease that requires the applicant to remove the tower and associated facilities upon cessation of operations at the site shall be submitted at the time of application. If a tower is not removed within six months of the cessation of operations at a site, the tower and associated facilities may be removed by the city and the costs of removal assessed against the property pursuant to the Crystal city code, section 635chapter VI. (15)(18) Additional criteria for variances for towers. The city council may grant a variance pursuant to the Crystal city code, subsection 510.33 if the applicant also demonstrates all of the following with written or other satisfactory evidence: (i) The location, shape, appearance or nature of use of the proposed tower will neither substantially detract from the aesthetics of the area nor change the character of the neighborhood in which the tower is proposed to be located; (ii) The variance will not create any threat to the public health, safety, or welfare; (iii) In the case of a requested modification to the setback locational requirements, the applicant may provide the following justifications for approval of the variance: Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.7", Hanging: 0.35", Outlinenumbered + Level: 7 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Startat: 12 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.69" + Tab after: 1.99" + Indent at: 1.99" 98 (A) that theThe size of parcel upon which the tower is proposed to be located makes compliance impossible, and the only alternative for the applicant is to locate the tower at another site that poses a greater threat to the public health, safety or welfare or is closer in proximity to lands used for residential purposes;. (B) According to written technical evidence from an engineer, the proposed tower and telecommunications facilities must be located at the proposed site in order to close a significant gap in the provider’s coverage in the city and that landscaping and other buffers are provided to lessen the tower’s visibility to residential areas. (iv) In the case of a request for modification to the separation requirements of this subsection that the proposed site is zoned I and the proposed site is at least double the minimum standard for separation from lands used for residential purposes; (v) In the case of a request for modification of the separation requirements of this subsection, if the person provides written technical evidence from an engineer that the proposed tower and telecommunications facilities must be located at the proposed site in order to close a significant gap within the city in coverage of the provider and if the person agrees to create approved landscaping and other buffers to screen the tower from being visible to the residential area; and (vi)(iv) In the case of a request for modification of the maximum height limit, that the modification is necessary to: (1A) facilitate co-location of telecommunications facilities in order to avoid construction of a new tower; or (2B) to meet the coverage requirements of the applicant's wireless communications system, which requirements must be documented with written, technical evidence from an engineer. (17)(19) Maintenance. Towers must be maintained in accordance with the following provisions: (i) Tower owners must employ ordinary and reasonable care in construction and use commonly accepted methods and devices for preventing failures and accidents that are likely to cause damage, injuries, or nuisances to the public; (ii) Tower owners must install and maintain towers, telecommunications facilities, wires, cables, fixtures and other equipment in compliance with the requirements of the national electric safety code and all federal communications commission, state and local regulations, and in such a manner that they will not interfere with the use of other property; (iii) Towers, telecommunications facilities and antenna support structures must be kept and maintained in good condition, order, and repair; 99 (iv) Maintenance or construction on a tower, telecommunications facilities or antenna support structure must be performed by qualified maintenance and construction personnel; (v) Towers must comply with radio frequency emissions standards of the federal communications commission; and (vi) In the event the use of a tower is discontinued by the tower owner, the tower owners must provide written notice to the city of its intent to discontinue use and the date when the use will be discontinued. (18)(20) Additional requirements. (i) Inspections. The city may conduct inspections at any time, upon reasonable notice to the property owner and the tower owner to inspect the tower for the purpose of determining if it complies with the Uniform state Building building Code code and other construction standards provided by the city code, federal and state law. The expense related to such inspections will be borne by the property owner. Based upon the results of an inspection, the building official may require repair or removal of a tower. (ii) Excavation and monitoringCompliance to emission requirements. The city may request that The the owner of a telecommunications facility shall provide the city with current, technical evidence of compliance with FCC radiation emission requirements, annually or more frequently at the city’s reasonable request. If the owner does not promptly provide the city with satisfactory technical evidence of FCC compliance, the city may carry out tests to ensure FCC radiation compliance using a qualified expert. The owner shall reimburse the city for its reasonable costs in carrying out such compliance testing. (c) Wireless support structures. New wireless support structures for the siting of small wireless facilities in the public street right-of-way adjacent to the R-1 zoning district, are subject to the following standards: (1) No taller than 50 feet in height; (2) No less than five feet from the street curb; (3) No more than five feet from the side lot line extended to the street; (4) To the extent possible, have an antenna that is shrouded or camouflaged; (5) Constructed from earth-tone fiberglass; and (6) Served by underground power and communication lines. The structure shall not be served by any above-ground power or communication lines. Subd. 7. Public, institutional and recreational use category. 123 Table 6: Permitted Encroachments [1] R-1 R-2 R-3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Air conditioning or heating equipment 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property Not Applicable 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property Not Applicable Attached decks or open porches Front/rear: 10 feet for attached decks or open porches in the front or rear yard of one or two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or porch encroaches into the 30 foot required setback Side: 3 feet Corner side: 3 feet Front/rear: 10 feet for attached decks or open porches in the front or rear yard of one or two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or porch encroaches into the 30 foot required setback Side: 3 feet Corner side: 3 feet Front/rear: 10 feet for attached decks or open porches in the front or rear yard of one or two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or porch encroaches into the 30 foot required setback Side: 3 feet Corner side: 3 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Awnings Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3feet Corner side: 2 feet Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 2 feet Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 2 feet Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 2 feet Front/corner side: May be located up to the property line Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 2 feet Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3feet Corner side: 2 feet 126 Table 6: Permitted Encroachments [1] R-1 R-2 R-3 Commercial TC Industrial AP NOTES: [1] Encroachments are permitted as shown in the table, but in no instance shall encroachments be allowed in a platted or dedicated easement. [2] Unless otherwise described, the numerical dimensions listed in this table are the linear dimensions allowed for the setback encroachment. For example, in the R-1 district, awnings may be three feet closer to the front property line than the required front setback for the dwelling. [3] Front setback: Building projections or bumpouts to the front of the principal building are allowed, subject to these conditions: 1) Each addition shall not exceed 24 feet in width, and the cumulative width of all additions shall not exceed 50% of the width of the principal building; 2) Each addition’s encroachment into the 30 foot required front setback shall not exceed 80 square feet, and the cumulative encroachment of all additions shall not exceed 100 square feet. Rear setback: Building projections or bumpouts to the rear of the principal building are allowed, subject to these conditions: 1) The encroachment occupies no more than 300 square feet of the area within the rear setback; 2) The width of the encroachment is no more than 50%% of the lot width measured at the rear setback line; 3) The property owner removes any existing accessory buildings from the rear yard; 4) The property owner signs and has notarized a written statement to the city acknowledging that no accessory buildings may be built or placed in the rear yard and this statement will be recorded against the property. [4] If an egress window is constructed as part of the foundation of the dwelling, the egress window shall meet the required setbacks for the dwelling. 520.03. Site development standards. Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of these site development standards is to further the purpose of this UDC and the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. Furthermore these standards are intended to establish appropriate lot dimensions and setbacks within each zoning district and provide for appropriate scale of structures. Subd. 2. Site development standards. (a) Site development standards for principal buildings. Table 7 are the regulations for residential densities, setbacks, number of principal buildings, lot dimensions, building height, and green space for placing principal buildings in the city’s zoning districts. (b) Site development standards for accessory structures. Table 8 are the setback and height requirements for placing accessory structures in the city’s zoning districts. Table 7: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Principal Buildings R1 R2 R3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Permitted Residential Density Permitted Residential Density No more than 6 units per acre (gross) 6 to 16 units per acre (gross) 16 to 40 units per acre (gross) Not Applicable 25 to 50 80 units per acre (gross) Not Applicable Not Applicable Minimum Building Setbacks [1] 127 Table 7: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Principal Buildings R1 R2 R3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Front 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 10 feet 1 foot minimum 10 foot maximum 10 feet 200’ from residential use Side 5 feet 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet 0 foot minimum 10 feet 200’ from residential use Rear 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 10 feet 3 foot minimum 10 feet 200’ from residential use Corner Side 10 feet [2] 30 feet 30 feet 15 feet 2 foot minimum 12 foot maximum 15 feet 200’ from residential use Number of Principal Buildings Maximum number of principal buildings per property One One One One Not Applicable One Not Applicable Minimum Lot Area One-family Detached Dwelling 6,000 SF 6,000 SF Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Two-Family Dwelling 1210,000 SF 1210,000 SF 1210,000 SF Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Other Residential Uses Not Applicable 3,000 per dwelling, but in no event less than 10,000 SF 10,000 SF 1,200 per dwelling, but in no event less than 20,000 SF 20,000 SF Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Non-Residential Uses [3] Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 20,000 SF Not Applicable 20,000 SF Not Applicable Minimum Lot Depth One-family Detached Dwelling 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Two-Family Dwelling 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Other Residential Uses Not Applicable 100 feet 100 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Non-Residential Uses [3] 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 120 feet Not Applicable 120 feet Not Applicable Minimum Lot Width One-family Detached Dwelling 50 feet 50 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 133  Table 8: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Accessory Structures  Accessory Structure  Type R1 R2 R3 Commercial TC Industrial AP  Accessory dwelling  units, detached  The height  of the  dwelling  unit cannot  exceed the  height of  the principal  building or  20’,  whichever is  less  22 feet  The height  of the  dwelling  unit cannot  exceed the  height of  the principal  building or  20’,  whichever is  less  22 feet  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Amateur radio  towers   Tower   not to   exceed   75 feet  Tower   not to  exceed   75 feet  Tower   not to  exceed   75 feet  Tower   not to  exceed   75 feet  Not  Applicable  Tower   not to exceed   75 feet  Tower   not to  exceed   75 feet   Commercial storage  buildings  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  20 feet Not  Applicable  20 feet 25 feet  Detached accessory  buildings [6]  15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Not  Applicable  15 feet 15 feet  Essential services  (such as poles or  towers)  As determined  by the city  engineer   As determined  by the city  engineer   As determined  by the city  engineer   As  determined  by the city  engineer  As determined  by the city  engineer   As determined  by the city  engineer   As determined  by the city  engineer   Fences See  subsection  520.09  See  subsection  520.09  See  subsection  520.09  See  subsection  520.09  Not  Applicable  See  subsection  520.09  See  subsection  520.09  Flagpoles 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet  Satellite dishes Not to  exceed 4  feet above   the roof  Not to  exceed 4  feet above   the roof  Not to  exceed 4  feet   above   the roof  Not to  exceed 4  feet above  the roof  Not to  exceed 4  feet   above   the roof  Not to  exceed 4 feet   above   the roof  Not to  exceed 4  feet above   the roof  Solar energy  systems  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the  maximum  allowed  building  height  Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at  maximum  tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the  maximum  allowed  building  height  Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at  maximum  tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the  maximum  allowed  building  height  Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at  maximum  tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the  maximum  allowed  building  height  Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at  maximum  tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the  maximum  allowed  building  height    Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the  maximum  allowed  building  height  Freestanding: 20  feet when  oriented at  maximum tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the  maximum  allowed  building  height  Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at  maximum  tilt  154 Table 11: Parking Spaces by Use Use Type Minimum Maximum Outdoor Recreational Facilities 10 spaces per acre of play field, plus 4 per basketball court, two space per tennis court, or 1 space per 50 square feet of deck area for a swimming pool Not applicable Banquet halls, event centers, Religious Institutions, or similar places where persons gather or assemble 4 spaces, plus no less than 1 space per 3 seats based on the cumulative design capacity of the assembly room or spaces 4 spaces, plus no more than 1 space per 2 seats based on the cumulative design capacity of the assembly room or spaces Schools, nursery or preschool, elementary and middle school 10 spaces, plus no less than 1 space per classroom and 1 space per 40 students based on designed capacity Not applicable Notes: 1. The minimum number of parking spaces for senior housing is 1 space per household unit, 50% of which shall be enclosed in a garage. 2. If applicable, 1 space per 4 person capacity shall be provided for conference rooms or other assembly spaces and 1 space shall be provided for a manager who resides on the property. 3. Motor vehicle stacking space shall also be provided for making up a funeral procession, although drive aisles in the parking lot may be used for stacking. 4. The parking requirement for retail sales and service establishments with more than 50% or more of gross floor area devoted to storage or warehouse shall be: 4 spaces, plus no less than 1 space per 500 nor more than 1 space per 250 square feet devoted to sales or service, plus no less than 1 space per 3,000 nor more than 1,000 square feet of storage. Subd. 7. Disabled parking requirements. Parking spaces required for the disabled shall be provided in compliance with all applicable state and federal requirements. If practicable, spaces for the disabled shall be located so they provide easy access from the closest parking area to the major entrance of the use for which they are provided. Subd. 8. Modification of parking requirements. For all uses except one and two-family dwellings, the number of parking spaces required in Table 11 may be modified according to the following provisions. If a request is made to reduce the number of parking spaces in both (b) and (c) of this subsection, the total reduction shall not exceed ten percent of the required number of spaces. Approval of requests to provide more or less parking spaces, or reducing the number of enclosed spaces, shall be made according to the applicable review procedure associated with the principal uses listed in Table 11, unless otherwise noted in this subsection. 165 Subd. 2. Applicability. Except as provided for in this subsection, these requirements are applicable for subdivision or lot consolidation applications, site plans, conditional use permits, building permits, or other land disturbing activities on existing properties, except if this requirement is waived by the city engineer. Subd. 3. Exemptions. The provisions of this section do not apply to: (a) Any part of a subdivision if a plat for the subdivision has been approved by the city council on or before the effective date of this UDC; (b) Any land disturbing activity for which plans have been approved by the watershed management organization within six months prior to the effective date of this UDC; (c) A lot for which a building permit has been approved on or before the effective date of this UDC; (d) Installation of fence, sign, telephone, and electric poles and other kinds of posts or poles; or (e) Emergency work to protect life, limb, or property. Subd. 4. Storm water management plan. When a subdivision, lot consolidation, site plan, or conditional use permit application is submitted, the applicant shall include a storm water management plan, unless this requirement is waived by the city engineer. The plan shall contain the following information. (a) Existing site map. A map of existing site conditions showing the site and immediately adjacent areas, including: (1) The street address, property identification number or legal description of the subject property; (2) North point, date, scale of drawing, and number of sheets; (3) Existing topography with a contour interval appropriate to the topography of the land but in no case having a contour interval greater than two feet; (4) A delineation of all streams, rivers, public waters and wetlands located on and immediately adjacent to the site, including depth of water, a description of all vegetation which may be found in the water, a statement of general water quality and any classification given to the water body or wetland by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and/or the United States Army Corps of Engineers; (5) Location and dimensions of existing storm water drainage systems and natural drainage patterns on and immediately adjacent to the site delineating in which direction and at what rate storm water is conveyed from the site, identifying the receiving stream, river, public water, or wetland, and setting forth those areas of the unaltered site where storm water collects;