1998.09.14 PC Meeting Packet'iS
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SUMMARY
September 14, 1998
7:00 PM
A. Approval of Minutes from August 10, 1998 Meeting
B. Public Hearings
1. Public Hearing to consider the following proposed text changes to Crystal City
Code:
❑ In 515.07 Subd. 5, eliminate the prohibition on accessory buildings in the front
half of the lot
❑ In 515.09 Subd. 6, clarify the ordinance to make it consistent with past
practice
❑ In 515.13 Subd. 3, make the requirement for side street side yards on corner
lots consistent so that it does not vary depending on the orientation of the
building
❑ Additional changes in 515.07, 09 and 13 to clarify and simplify existing
ordinance provisions
C. Other Business
1. Review a request to revise the landscaped areas at 5141 Lakeland Ave N
(Killmer Electric; former Johnson Equipment site)
D. Adjournment
• For additional information, contact John Sutter at 531-1942 •
September 11, 1998 \\CY_FS1\SYS\GROUPS\COMDEVLP\PLANNING\PLANCOMM\1998\09-14\agendasummary.doc
192
August 10, 1998
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the
following present: Bonnell, Elsen, Graham, Kamp, Koss, Krueger, Magnuson and
Nystrom. Commissioner VonRueden arrived at 7:05 p.m. Also present were Planner
Sutter and Recording Secretary Bergren
A. Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to approve
the minutes of the July 13, 1998, meeting.
Motion carried.
B (1). Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and the place as advertised for a public
hearing to consider Application 98-13.1 for Rezoning of 6800 56th Avenue North (Boston
B (2) Market site), P.I.D. 05-118-21-42-0039, from B-3 Auto -Oriented Commercial to B-4
Community Commercial, as submitted by Meridian Properties Real Estate Development
LLC, Maple Grove MN.
Planner Sutter stated that the proposed rezoning would be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, and that the subject property is proposed to be used for a part of the
site for a new Walgreen's store.
Chair Magnuson stated before they made a recommendation on whether they would
approve the rezoning, they would like to know what is proposed for the property to be
rezoned.
Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and the place as advertised for a public
hearing to consider Application 98-14.3 for Site Plan Review to allow construction of a
13,905 sq. ft. retail store in the B-4 Community Commercial District at 5607 West
Broadway and 6800 56th Avenue North (Palace Inn and Boston Market sites), P.I.D. 05-
118-21-42-0071 and 05-118-21-42-0039, as submitted by Meridian Properties Real
Estate Development LLC, Maple Grove MN. This public hearing would be combined
with the hearing on Application 98-13.1 previously opened.
Planner Sutter explained the proposed site plan for a 13,905 sq. ft. Walgreen's store, and
stated that staff recommendation is for approval of the site plan subject to the conditions
outlined in the staff report. He also stated that combining the two properties for both tax
and zoning purposes should be a required condition for approval of the Site Plan Review.
Because the site plan shows parking stalls in excess of those required by City Code, staff
would like to have the three southeasterly parking spaces eliminated to provide more
landscaping area. The signage shown on the site plan and building elevations does not
meet City Code; the applicant will have to modify their proposed signage to meet City
setbacks and size limitations, or apply for a variance.
Bob Cunningham appeared from Told Real Estate to speak on behalf of the applicant. He
stated that the site plan had been revised to incorporate all of the staff s recommendations
except for the elimination of the three parking stalls in the far southeast corner.
08/21/98 F:\GROUPS\COMDEVLP\PLANNING\PLANCOMM\1998\08-10\MINUTES.DOC
193
August 10, 1998
No one appeared in opposition.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Koss to close the
combined public hearings.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Bonnell to recommend
to the City Council to approve Application 98-13.1 for Rezoning of 6800 56th Avenue
North (Boston Market site), P.I.D. 05-118-21-42-0039, from B-3 Auto -Oriented
Commercial to B-4 Community Commercial, as submitted by Meridian Properties Real
Estate Development LLC, Maple Grove MN. The findings of fact are as follows:
❑ The project is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
❑ The geographic area involved is appropriate for the proposed use.
❑ The use is not expected to depreciate the area in which it is proposed.
❑ The project is compatible with the character of the surrounding area.
❑ The demonstrated need for such use is apparent in the marketplace, as the applicant
has made the decision to invest in the facility.
The following voted aye: Bonnell, Elsen, Graham, Kamp, Koss, Krueger, Magnuson and
VonRueden. The following voted no: Nystrom.
Motion carried 8 to 1.
Moved by Commissioner Bonnell and seconded by Commissioner Koss to recommend to
the City Council to approve Application 98-14.3 for Site Plan Review to allow `—
construction of a 13,905 sq. ft. retail store in the B-4 Community Commercial District at
5607 West Broadway and 6800 56th Avenue North (Palace Inn and Boston Market sites),
P.I.D. 05-118-21-42-0071 and 05-118-21-42-0039, as submitted by Meridian Properties
Real Estate Development LLC, Maple Grove MN, subject to the following conditions:
❑ The existing hydrant near the northwest corner of the property shall remain.
❑ All drive aisles must be at least 25 feet wide. This includes the drive aisle on the west
side of the pharmacy drive-through.
❑ As per staff discussions with the Hennepin County Highway Department, the exits
from the parking lot to 56th Avenue and West Broadway shall be signed with a stop
sign and a right turn only sign.
❑ The northeasternmost parking stall shall be eliminated, to reduce the likelihood of
conflicts between traffic entering the site and cars backing out of that stall.
❑ The three southeasternmost parking stalls shall be eliminated, to allow for a larger
landscaped area near the intersection of West Broadway and 56th Avenue. Such
landscaping shall be as determined to be appropriate by the City Forester.
❑ No sign permit shall be issued except for signs that would comply with City Code.
Any request for a sign variance shall be brought to the Planning Commission prior to
setting a public hearing.
08/21/98 F:\GROUPS\COMDEVLP\PLANNING\PLANCOMM\1998\08-10WINUTES.DOC
194
August 10, 1998
❑ No building permit shall be issued until Hennepin County has combined the two
parcels into a single parcel, and the applicant has furnished evidence of this
combination to the City.
❑ No building permit shall be issued until the applicant executes the required Site
Improvement Agreement.
The following voted aye: Bonnell, Elsen, Kamp, Koss, Krueger, Magnuson and
VonRueden. The following voted no: Graham and Nystrom.
Motion carried 7 to 2.
B (3). Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and the place as advertised for a public
hearing to consider Application 98-15.1 for Rezoning of 5160 West Broadway (Suttle
Car Wash site), P.I.D. 09-118-21-24-0023, from B-3 Auto -Oriented Commercial to I-2
Heavy Industrial, as submitted by the Crystal Planning Commission (515.53 Subd. 2).
Planner Sutter presented that there was only a small portion of the property that was
zoned B-3 Auto Oriented Commercial. Rezoning to I-2 Heavy Industrial would make the
zoning consistent across the parcel, and would fit the neighborhood and be consistent
with the intent of the Comprehensive plan.
No one appeared in opposition.
Moved by Commissioner Koss and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Koss and seconded by Commissioner Bonnell to recommend to
the City Council to approve Application 98-15.1 for Rezoning of 5160 West Broadway
(Suttle Car Wash site), P.I.D. 09-118-21-24-0023, from B-3 Auto -Oriented Commercial
to I-2 Heavy Industrial, as submitted by the Crystal Planning Commission (515.53 Subd.
2).
The findings of fact are as follows:
❑ The project is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
❑ The geographic area involved is appropriate for the proposed use.
❑ The use is not expected to depreciate the area in which it is proposed.
❑ The project is compatible with the character of the surrounding area.
❑ The demonstrated need for such use is apparent in the marketplace, as the applicant
has made the decision to invest in the facility.
Motion carried.
C (1). Discussion Item: Sign regulations / replatting applicable to regional shopping centers
The Commission discussed larger properties, specifically that shopping centers may
subdivide their land into smaller parcels to be able to have more freestanding signs. The
08/21/98 F:\GROUPS\COMDEVLP\PLANNING\PLANCOMM\1998\08-10WIINUTES.DOC
195
August 10, 1998
Commission decided that this would be a short term problem. Instead of a major revision
of the ordinance, the larger properties have the opportunity to go through the process of
subdividing their land if so desired.
C (2). Discussion Item: Briefing by City Attorney Steve Bubul regarding the role and
responsibilities of the Planning Commission.
Steve Bubul, City Attorney, addressed the Planning Commission and went over the
responsibilities of the Planning Commission.
C (3). Discussion Item: Accessory buildings in rear yards (515.07 Subd. 5-b), parking in yards
515.09 Subd. 6), and yard definitions as they relate to both.
Planner Sutter brought to the Planning Commission some confusing language in the
Zoning Ordinances regarding yards, including specific definitions of front, side and rear
yards. The Planning Commission asked Planner Sutter to look at new language and bring
it to the commission for a public hearing at a later date.
C (4). Defer public hearing on Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment revising definitions of Auto
Repair uses until a comprehensive review of commercial and industrial district use
regulations is completed.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to defer a
public hearing revising definitions of Auto Repair uses until a comprehensive review of
commercial and industrial district use regulations is completed.
Motion carried.
D. Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn.
Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
Chair Magnuson
Secretary Nystrom
08/21/98 F:\GROUPS\COMDEVLP\PLANNING\PLANCOMM\1998\08-10WIINUTES.DOC
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: September 10, 1998
TO: Planning Commission (September le meeting — Public Hearing #1)
FROM: Z165, John Sutter, Planner
SUBJ.: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
515.07, 515.09&515.13
A. BACKGROUND
Staff has discussed with the Planning Commission the need to make relatively minor
changes to the Zoning Ordinance, to simplify the ordinance where possible, and to
ensure consistency between the regulations and the policies being enforced.
B. STAFF COMMENTS
The following are the text changes to be considered as part of this text amendment.
Additions are indicated by underlining; deletions are indicated by Staff
comments in bold and italics immediately follow each proposed change.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
515.07 General Building Requirements
Subd. 5. Accessory Buildings, Structures, Uses and Equipment.
a) An accessory building shall be considered an integral part of the principal building if it is
connected to the principal building by a covered passageway.
b) No detached accessory building or structure shall be erected or located within any required yard
other than that portion of a rear yard which is not also a required side street side yard. suh No
accessory building or structure shall P.at exceed one story over 15 feet in height ;IQ;or occupy
more than 30 percent of the area of any rear yard. The. mov;m„m YPQY ya;11O! Wt It.GYO RL] @11 14C
thig
This would make the ordinance consistent with past practice, which computes
max. coverage at 30% of the existing rear yard, not the required rear yard. It
would also clarify that, on corner lots, accessory structures in the rear yard
cannot encroach on the required side street side yard.
C) Detached accessory buildings, structures and permanent equipment in the residential districts
shall conform to the following additional regulations as to their location upon the lots:
new) In the R-1 or R-2 Districts, accessory buildings other than private garages shall not be
located in that part of the lot in front of the rear line of the principal building.
In the R-1 and R-2 Districts, this would prohibit accessory buildings that
are not garages, such as storage sheds, from being located anywhere
other than the rear yard.
These changes would eliminate the provisions requiring greater setbacks for
detached garages than are required for principal structures. For example:
q
H59 V
- ---1
FkLA7T
(present)
P5� ► 16Ar
(proposed)
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - 515.07, 515.09 & 515.13
2
5) No portion of any detached accessory building, structure or permanent equipment shall be
within three feet of any lot line.
This is a limitation on what can be required under 1-4 above, and therefore
may be eliminated along with 1-4.
7) The vehicle entrance to a garage in a residential district must, if the vehicle entrance abuts
a public alley or side street, be set back at least 50 feet from the centerline of the side
street and not less than 20 feet from the property line of the lot. (Amended, Ord. No. 92-
9, Sec. 1)
This change clarifies the intent, i.e, garage vehicle entrances are to be at
least 20 feet from any property line that runs along a street or alley.
This provision does not seem to belong here and should be incorporated
into 515.13 Subd. 5.
d) No accessory uses or equipment such as air-conditioning cooling structures or condensers which
generate noise shall be located in a side yard of a residential use or abutting a residential use
e) Notwithstanding the provisions of clauses b) and c) a detached accessory building or structure
may be erected or located within a front yard on an interior lot abutting in whole on Twin Lakes,
provided it does not encroach in the 30' front yard setback or 5' side yard setback. (Added, Ord.
No. 85-13, Sec. 1)
515.09 Off -Street Parking Requirements
Subd. 6. Location. All accessory off-street parking facilitie shall
be located and restricted as follows:
a) Required accessory off-street parking shall be on the same lot under the same ownership as the
principal use being served, except as noted 515 Subd. 7, Control of Off-site Parking facilities.
b) Except for single, two family and townhouse dwellings, head -in parking, directly off of and
adjacent to a public street, with each stall having its own direct access to the public street, shall
be prohibited.
C) The boulevard portion of the street right-of-way shall not be used for parking.
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - 515.07, 515.09 & 515.13
3
d) Set Back Area. Accessory off-street parking shall not be provided in
required front yards on any lot or in required side street side yards in the case of a corner lot, in
R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-0, B -la, and B-1 Districts, except as provided for in e) for single family,
two family or townhouse dwellings.
These changes would:
❑ apply the standard to all parking, not just parking required by the Code;
❑ clarify that parking is prohibited in the required front yards and side street
side yards, rather than the front yards and side street side yards existing
between the principal structure and the property line;
❑ clarify that single family, two family and townhouse dwellings are regulated
under e) below.
e) In the case of single family, two family or townhouse dwellings, off-street parking is not
permitted in any front, rear or side yard except on designated driveways leading directly into a
garage or on an open, surfaced space located on the side of the driveway. The accessory parking
may be located adjacent to the existing garage, on one side of the garage only, provided the space
is surfaced and located no closer than ten feet to the principal portion of an adjacent residential
structure. One turn -around space may be considered accessory parking. Accessory parking may
not be more than one space located (i) on the side of the driveway, (ii) adjacent on one side of an
existing garage, or (iii) as a turn -around space. The parking of recreational vehicles is governed
by City Code, Section 1330. (Amended, Ord. No. 92-3, Sec. 7; Ord. No. 93-7, Sec. 4)
This change would clarify that any exterior parking for single family, two family or
townhouse dwellings would be limited to driveways leading directly into a garage
plus one additional space located on the side of the driveway or garage.
This provision could be eliminated because it is identical to language already
present in 515.07 Subd. 5 e) and does not fit this subdivision.
g) In business districts and industrial districts, motor vehicles may not be parked and displayed in
parking lots for the purpose of selling the motor vehicles or offering the motor vehicles for sale.
(Added, Ord. No. 92-3, Sec. 8)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
515.13 Yard Requirements
Subd. 3. Side Yards as defined by Subsection 515.03, Subd. 185 of this Code.
a) R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-0, B -la, and B-1 Districts.
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - 515.07, 515.09 & 515.13
4
1) Interior Side Yards. At least two side yards, one on each side of the principal building or
use. The side yard in the case of one and two family dwellings, two stories or smaller
shall have a width of not less than five feet, and in the case of larger buildings and other
uses, the side yard shall not be less than 15 feet in width.
2) Side Street Side Yard - R-1 and R-2 Districts.
i) In the case of a corner lot in the R-1 District ha.»nR the, 19agest di;ne.;4riQ,, W�tLa
nri Gipa h,,;i, k4g pa; 11W44g the, 1@4 4on4 adjacent to a local street as designated
in the comprehensive plan, the side yard on the street must have a width of at least
ten feet. (Amended, Ord. No. 91-22, Sec. 1)
ii) In the case of a corner lot in the R-1 District ha;4;;g the 1o;;g@rt ai;neagioa ^f+he.
.,ri,,, ipa b;6W k;g pa;analing +ho I-„*-fi;QQ+ adjacent to a collector or mi;;Q arterial
street as designated in the comprehensive plan, the side yard on the side street
must have a width of at least 15 feet. (Amended, Ord. No. 91-22, Sec. 1)
Presently the ordinance requires a larger side street side yard (30'
vs. 10' or 15) for houses with their shortest dimension paralleling
the shortest dimension on the lot. The proposed change would
eliminate these provisions so that the same side street side yard
would be required regardless of the orientation of the house, as
shown below:
StxE�-r
(present) (proposed)
iv) In the case of a corner lot in the R-2 District, the side yard setback adjacent to a
side street for the principal use shall be not less than 30 feet from the side yard lot
line nor less than 60 feet from the center line of the street.
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - 515.07, 515.09 & 515.13
5
This would eliminate the additional setback for detached accessory
buildings from side street lot lines. Such buildings would be subject
to the same setback as principal buildings (i.e., 10 feet from a side
lot line along a local street), except when the vehicle entrance to a
garage faces a street or alley as provided for in 515.07 Subd. 5)c)7),
in which case they would be subject to setbacks of 50 feet from the
centerline of the side street and 20 feet from the property line.
3) Side Street Side Yard - R-3, R-4, R-0, B -la and B-1 Districts. A side yard setback for
principal and accessory uses adjacent to the side street equal to the height of the building
less 30 feet but in no case less than 30 feet from the property line nor less than 60 feet
from the center line of the street.
b) B-2, B-3, B-4, I-1, and I-2 Districts.
1) Interior Side Yards. Zero feet from side lot line.
2) Side Street Side Yard. Shall not be closer than 55 feet from the center line of the street
but not less than 22 feet from the side street lot line.
3) Buildings shall be so arranged on their grounds so as to permit compliance with the off-
street parking and off-street loading requirements as outlined in Subsection 515.09 and
515.11 of this Code.
C) P-1 District.
1) Interior Side Yard. No parking space shall be located within five feet from an interior
side yard lot line.
2) Corner Lot. No parking space shall be located closer than five feet from the side street
side yard lot line.
d) P-2 District.
1) Interior Side Yard. No parking space shall be located within five feet from an interior
side yard lot line.
2) Corner Lot. No parking space shall be located less than 60 feet from the center line of the
side street or 30 feet from the side street side yard lot line.
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - 515.07, 515.09 & 515.13
6
Subd. 5. Structures in Required Yards. Every part of a required yard shall be open and
unobstructed by any building or structure, from its lowest point upward, except as
follows:
a) In a front yard: awnings; steps; chimney; flag pole; eaves; bays encroaching no more than 24
inches into the front yard set back provided the window projects at sill level and does not
increase the floor area of the structure; a one story entranceway for a detached single family or
duplex dwelling not to exceed four feet; and handicap ramps. (Amended, Ord. 82-13, Sec. 1)
This section is a better location for the underlined language that is presently
located in 515.07 Subd. 5 c) 8).
b) In a rear yard: entrance or foyer, terraces, awnings, canopies, steps, chimney, flag pole, eaves,
recreational equipment, clothes line poles, arbors and trellises, detached outdoor living rooms,
detached garages, storage sheds, and air conditioning or heating equipment. A storage shed not
exceeding 120 square feet in area may be located in a rear yard notwithstanding the fact that the
lot on which it is located does not conform to the provisions of Subsection 515.15 of this Code,
but the storage shed shall conform to all other provisions of the City Code. (Amended, Ord. 82-
13, Sec. 1)
c) In a side yard, side street side yard, or rear yard:
s515 Q9, Fences or walls not exceeding eight feet in height and as regulated by
Subsection 515.07, Subdivision 8 of this Code. However, in a corner lot no obstruction higher
than curb level shall be located within 25 feet of the lot corner formed by the property line of any
two intersecting streets.
The reference to parking spaces is not necessary because a parking space is not
a structure. Also, the apparent typographical error could be corrected.
d) In a side yard: awnings, steps and eaves.
---------------------------------------
C. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the changes described in Staff Comments above.
The Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the proposed
changes for City Council consideration.
The City Council will consider the draft ordinance at their next regular meeting on
Tuesday October 201, and would hold second reading and adoption at the following
regular meeting on Wednesday November 4t".
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - 515.07, 515.09 & 515.13
7
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: September 10, 1998
TO: Planning Commission (September 14th meeting — Other Business Item #1)
FROM: John Sutter, Planner
SUBJ.: 5141 Lakeland Avenue — Killmer Electric
(former Johnson Equipment site)
P.I.D. 09-118-21-24-0001, 0002 & 0004
A. BACKGROUND
The Johnson Equipment building, located at 5141 Lakeland Avenue, is mostly vacant
except for an automotive repair business located on the west side of the building. The
subject property consists of three parcels and is located in the 1-2 Heavy Industrial
District. On June 16th the City Council approved a Site Plan Review and Conditional
Use Permit for Killmer Electric to remodel the existing building to house its warehouse
and offices, and to establish a contractor yard as an accessory use along the western
edge of the site. The language in the June 16th approval allowed for "minor
adjustments" in the location of landscaping islands shown on the site plan. Since that
time Killmer has determined that it would prefer to significantly reconfigure the
landscaping islands; staff determined that this would require Planning Commission and
City Council review and approval.
The following informational items are attached:
❑ plat map showing the subject property and adjacent zoning districts
❑ site plan approved by City Council on June 16th
❑ site plan alternate #1 proposed by Killmer Electric
❑ site plan alternate #2 proposed by Killmer Electric
❑ staff recommendation for revised site plan (based on alternate #2)
B. STAFF COMMENTS
The main objective of the landscaping islands on the west part of the parking lot was to
screen the materials storage areas along the west edge of the site from view by
motorists on County Road 81. The two alternates proposed by Killmer Electric would
still meet this objective by moving the pole storage from behind the landscaping islands
to an area behind the 6' high sight obscuring fence that will also screen other raw
material storage. Alternate #1 shows a more extensive landscaping island immediately
north of the building; Alternate #2 would install a 75'x 250' grass area with a perimeter
trees in an existing asphalt area at the northeast corner of the site.
Staff opinion is that Alternate #1 would result in no change in the effectiveness of the
screening of the material storage area.
Staff opinion is that Alternate #2 would result in either no change or a very slight
reduction in the effectiveness of the screening of the material storage area. However, it
would also result in a significant improvement in the overall aesthetics of the site.
Specifically, it would create a 75' wide green space adjacent to the storm water pond
located north of the site. Furthermore, this green space could be extended westward to
the communications tower site as part of the hard surfacing of the west part of the site
which is required to be completed by October 15, 2002.
One of the considerations in the Council's actions on June 16th was compliance with the
following requirement for a Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage:
• Storage is screened from view from the public right-of-way in compliance with
Subsection 595.07 Subd. 9 of this Code.
Subd. 9 requires fences for screening but allows the Planning Commission to
recommend plantings as an alternative to fencing. Due to the unusual site
conditions, especially the high elevation of County Road 81 relative to the site,
screening near ground level is not as effective as the higher screening resulting
from large deciduous trees. Staff opinion is that either of the alternates
proposed by Killmer Electric would provide screening substantially comparable to
that approved on June 16th. For this reason, staff believes that other
considerations, such as the potential for aesthetic and environmental benefits
resulting from either of the two alternates, should be foremost in deciding
whether or not to accept either of the alternates proposed by Killmer Electric.
C. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the site plan be modified as provided in Alternate #2. This
alternate provides screening substantially comparable to that previously approved. It
also will significantly enhance the appearance of the site by providing for more green
space adjacent to a storm water retention pond located north of the site.
The Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the request, which
will be presented at the City Council meeting on September 16th
MODIFICATIONS TO LANDSCAPING ISLANDS - 5141 LAKELAND AVENUE
2
'� �w`�,p \ 177. 6. s ^'° .
o Z
Q Nso
G ! ; R'6
14 2.° 40. , 4 e,a NNr2
yiO 51 t O O d N 101.04, 05a -j2N 11 /Z
va 20 °5m:so
_ // � •?x • pis' ,. `'0^ � � ti 5 °' o a° rs "
16 so w 19 N 6 p N 8 09
17 . is W 204
a �r.9e
23 95-n2
JS'C Pp0• .� �\ tis �
1054 --
p
2 305 9 OO +t.�3+ '�° { ($p00) G..4j G•.47 �•
0 5� 3 `� c
z io 6o
ill9o? � --
City of crr5141
11150) ti` W
` Q�II 10 •I 9-
,250 STATE er Mtr 14.
- 160 G
2 EMILY °
2'
/60
562.9 I 4 3 — — — 'I "ESTATES ""`..
,° s
y � JIB_
o
i 133 73
SECURITIES i��
473.7/
�2 N D
ADDITION wr S h Nj>
V
o °3
't\
957.4
35 7.36 5 Q 2 )
�s NEZNIK
FLEMING
0 326,86
6 242.35 '
Ilo. 5Ln(00 72.$ i2.5 9e 84 40 !3o yO
5 W 0
O s
0lox:1.° ° I N ° Q °
iW O r 9 \
D 3
�� A 00 i v M ° /70 ° N �9 Q,
(6140)f / Z r3e.o9Q2 ^ Se
241.9
.Cssey (2910) A &Q—
N ,z9- Q m 3 O w� P C
se ,A s • ui Py° • 100 o 4-1
O >�, cy
l`yla o� 13 I . ' 'A 4
ole
FATHER 90 �s y`�.fl Izs i U.
cl�r
( O 171.57 MM w'
scNROED[RhO • 3 0 W 6`.�, jo toa 50
S&O ADD.
c � o � m.o � 0• 1• � °o ` e h 14 13
WILLIAM 10s o - 4 �o 07 (100)U tJ z
go _j
GLUM ADD. ��� 3 6 ,.9 O' 03� 19 zo
�o �e W e W m
�d 0 r
2g 1 7 •. v° 10 s.. °a r
/ 0. '0. 5e oe iso irr F
k5
_ I S 1� pl3 a
56
Se ' -
(v
H --
I
NEW HARP -31►tqyuNG
BY OCT 1,51 200„
�APO'
4'
r Im ii iii r
Q P•`C5 1 Ww 4Wb SURFAc4NIG Tb
F
slow (DO
o-
15io ;o
{..0.1MlO�a MA. fI.E
i
n FI�WCf.ING LC►p ` O
1[[V L[►! I�3N •A � .!V O
�/� c•frt
KI LL M T -:R. E:eCTKIQ co. c�c
.5141 LA_K IEL J AVC. N.
E � ----I
n[7❑a
nn nn
r
1
r
r
r
r
I EXISTING AbEouftis
0 t= LMID5mFED hR:-WS ib BE
`\ INsTALLAD By our: I s, Iy9S
\Ccooca- re f Elowel p— CUR$
\ �dIRE� - sl5', 09 sued. s-a-I6�
HARD - 5u1-wo>
I
I
i
1 RfvL I
I
41
,V
• r •
� I
mi f 60
1412EA "
L
L
m
-o
OD
+
CRrrV.N rMrlr
Q
7'u.MlrlYC,
V
itu.r SPIIJJCY
F1.wsRIH� cRAI►
�
HACKI�re«.W
KILLMEER aer-TRICco.1NG. \\
LS14I LA_K.KLtw1D Qv L. N.
__._.. -
fi
I
saww � a K_
I
oar :1
\00,
�1 �
�P�
M
�
V
5PnuCY
� J
f:'L.W*II.ING GRAB\`
52r"GrS7 ASH .R HACKL.OV -4V
�� 1
1121_ L L M EK. ECL;cTm co.e+c.
st•I LA -Kr -LA -"b 4vc,
Pw�r: A( .1aI "[,.y Pt..—.R.
P
t
Io tom."��CA /6, H�(1)A �JCt� O
I
I
1alw �a.K
1-
k—
v`R Cross��e� R's
1 U,WDSCArLwp AAEA4
am Ma NOR qml� lax r am
400
G' w*
ri.W-F- Tv Be
IKs1oAtim By
NW. is, 1998.
000
�P*A-
io
Q\PF'
-}
CR(M3.. F-t..PLr
�
y-IrNlQeie..
04-
'BL4` 5PR4Cy'
GRA*
.J ELDlt33 A,SN .R
NAC K��o./R1y
Kr LLM E Eu!c-T tr c-. ioc.
14Kn«,�n avc. rv.
o ie �o
5 L►.Lt. 1..= 10
7)A.T-&- , P 11- 17a 1 -r_ r ..._ _ .�...
New Nip WmFO t MSS
lb a' IkSrALM by
i
;if*
10,
MOtr.al,L Jr.tt^.%r
r
44
�5
T's
toypfoi.4� -- -._---
I Ewsn & ADEQUATE -S��4F GED
\ I
AMNS
se
\\ gY Nw. IS, I� 8
\ Cue& C R 12EClUrR ED� -
0
f
A
K
A
c—V-W—r w ..•.K .
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON ITEMS WHICH APPEARED BEFORE PLANNING
COMMISSION
Auaust 18, 1998
Consideration of the second reading of a Zoning Ordinance
text amendment to add a new clause (f) to 515.39, Subd..4,
which would have the effect of allowing car washes as a
conditional use in the I-1 and I-2 Districts.
Consideration of Application #98-11.3 for a site plan review
and Application #98-1l.for a conditional use permit at 5108
West Broadway (Crystal Collision Center) to allow
construction of a 9,300 sq. ft. one-story addition to an
existing auto body shop including a car wash as a
conditional use in the I-2 District—recommended approval.
Consideration of the first reading of an ordinance rezoning
property located at 5160 West Broadway (former Suttle Car
Wash) as submitted by Automotive Concepts from B-3 Auto -
Oriented Commercial to I-2 Heavy Industrial.
September 1, 1998
Consideration of the second reading of an ordinance rezoning
property located at 5160 West Broadway (former Suttle Car
Wash) as submitted by Automotive Concepts from B-3 Auto -
Oriented Commercial to I-2 Heavy Industrial.
Consideration of the first reading of an ordinance rezoning
property located at 6800 56th Ave N (former Boston Market)
as submitted by Meridian Properties from B-3 Auto -Oriented
Commercial to B-4 Community Commercial.
GAPI ann ina\PC\CCAction.DOC.j rs