2001.02.12 PC Work Session & Meeting PacketCRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SUMMARY
Crystal City Hall, 4141 Douglas Dr N
February 12, 2001
* Work Session *
Conference Room A
1. Discuss Development Code Revisions.
2. Adjournment.
* Regular Meeting *
Council Chambers
7:00 PM
1. Approval of Minutes from the January 8, 2001 Meeting
2. Consider revisions to previously approved site plan submitted by Greg A. Bichler
(applicant and owner) to construct a 3,498 sq. ft. dental office building on property
located at 5231 and 5237 Douglas Drive North (P.I.D. 08-118-21-11-0003 and 08-118-
21-11-0084).
3. Consider revisions to previously approved Planned Unit Development submitted by
SVK Development (applicant and owner) to reduce the building setback from the
north and east boundaries of the plat of Parkside Acres Second Addition.
4. Discussion Item: Possible lot division request, to include variances from minimum
lot area, lot depth and front yard setback, for property located at 6828 Corvallis
Avenue North (P.I.D. 08-118-21-13-0041).
5. Informal discussion and announcements.
6. Adjournment
• For additional information, contact John Sutter at 531-1142 •
F:\GROUPS\COM DEVLP\PLAN N I NG\PLANCOM M12001\02-12\agendasummary.doc
January 8, 2001
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSESSION MINUTES
The worksession meeting of the Crystal Planning commission convened at 6:00 p.m. with the following
present: Elsen, K. Graham (arrived at 6:10 p.m.), T. Graham (arrived at 6:45 p.m.), Kamp, Krueger,
Magnuson, Nystrom, and VonRueden. Also present were the following: Community Development
Director Peters, Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) was Koss.
Planner Sutter went through the proposed zoning districts, explaining how they fit in with the existing
districts. R-1 would remain basically the same, R-2 is a combination of R-2 and R-3, and R-3 would be
similar to what is currently R-4. Business districts would be changed to Commercial Districts with
zonings of C-1, C-2 (which is currently B-4), and C-3. C-1 was originally proposed as being Limited
Commercial, but to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan it is now proposed as Neighborhood
Commercial.
The members discussed whether to allow rental units in single-family properties; currently boarders are
allowed if there is a shared cooking area. Once there is a barrier such as a basement door separating
them from the rest of the house, the City considers it a duplex. In the past, R-2 zoning was permitted to
accommodate existing duplexes, the Planning Commission needs to decide if they want to continue that
practice.
It was questioned that if the zoning districts were changed, where would senior housing fit into it.
Planner Sutter said it would be in whichever zoning is appropriate for the project. There was also
additional discussion about square footage requirements for various types of housing such as senior and
assisted living. Staff will look at different options for addressing senior housing in the ordinance.
One of the Commission members requested that the manuals be redone. This will be done once
everything has been updated.
Community Development Director Peters spoke about the County Road 81 corridor. The committee just
received 3.1 million dollars to investigate a designated transit way. Two of the focus districts include
Crystal, along Highway 81 from 63rd south to Bass Lake Road, and Highway 81 and 36th Avenue North.
The next step will be a series of workshops and it was requested that one Planning Commission member
and one resident attend each workshop. Commissioners Nystrom and T. Graham will attend the
workshops for 36th Avenue on Wednesdays, 1/24, 2/28 (subject to change), and 3/28 at Robbinsdale City
Hall. Commissioners Kamp and K. Graham will attend the 63rd Avenue workshops on Thursdays, 2/1,
2/22 and 3/22 at Brooklyn Park Activity Center. All workshops run from 6:30 — 8:30 p.m.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Kamp to adjourn.
Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
Chair Magnuson
Secretary Nystrom
-� January 8, 2001
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the
following present: Elsen, K. Graham, T. Graham, Kamp, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom,
and VonRueden. Also present were the following: Community Development Director
Peters, Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) was
Koss.
Election of Officers for 2001.
Acting Chair Magnuson declared that nominations were open for officers of the Planning
Commission consisting of Chair, Vice Chair and Secretary for the year ending December
31, 2000.
A. Commissioner Kamp nominated and Commissioner Nystrom seconded the
nomination of Commissioner Magnuson as Chair of the Planning
Commission for the year ending December 31, 2001.
Motion carried.
B. Commissioner Nystrom nominated and Commissioner Krueger seconded
the nomination of Commissioner Elsen as Vice Chair of the Planning
Commission for the year ending December 31, 2001.
Motion carried
C. Commissioner Elsen nominated and Commissioner Krueger seconded the
nomination of Commissioner Nystrom as Secretary of the Planning
Commission for the year ending December 31, 2001.
Motion carried
2. Moved by Commissioner Krueger and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to approve the
minutes of the December 11, 2000 regular meeting, with no exceptions:
Motion carried.
3. Information Items:
❑ City Council Actions on Planning Commission Items
❑ Quarterly Development Status Report
❑ Planning Commission Attendance for 2000
❑ Due Dates for Planning & Zoning Applications in 2001
4. Informal Discussion and Announcements.
No discussion items or announcements.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 7:17 p.m.
Secretary Nystrom
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson
2
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Planning Commission (February 12" meeting — Item #2)
FROM: r John Sutter, Planner and Redevelopment Coordinator
SUBJECT: Consider revisions to previously approved site plan submitted by Greg A.
Bichler (applicant and owner) to construct a 3,498 sq. ft. dental office
building on property located at 5231 and 5237 Douglas Drive North (P.I.D.
08-118-21-11-0003 and 08-118-21-11-0084).
On August 15, 2000, the City council approved a site plan for construction of a 3,498 sq. ft.
dental office on a newly combined property at 5231 and 5237 Douglas Drive North. The
approved site plan showed 17 parking spaces, a trash enclosure, and a landscaping buffer
along the west and north sides of the property. The building was to face south, toward 52nd
Avenue.
We have received a revised site plan also showing 17 parking spaces, a trash enclosure, and
a landscaping buffer along the west and north sides of the property. The major difference is
that the building would face east, toward Douglas Drive.
The following informational items are attached:
❑ original site plan (approved August 15, 2000)
❑ revised site plan (incl. grading and landscaping plans)
❑ building elevations (unchanged)
The new orientation seems to fit the site and neighborhood much better. The only issue noted
by staff to date is the need to create a turn -around space for the northernmost parking space.
Under the proposed site plan, a vehicle using the northerly parking space would have a
difficult time backing out of that space. The creation of a turn -around space would solve this
problem and provide access to the trash enclosure.
Staff recommends approval of revisions to the previously approved site plan submitted by
Greg A. Bichler (applicant and owner) to construct a 3,498 sq. ft. dental office building on
property located at 5231 and 5237 Douglas Drive North (P.I.D. 08-118-21-11-0003 and 08-
118-21-11-0084), subject to the following conditions:
❑ The basement shall be used only for storage and utility purposes, and shall not be used in
any way which would act to increase the demand for off-street parking, unless the
necessary additional off-street parking is provided.
dP.Mr3rMTM IMIIP.M Is -WAe NAT.
❑ All signage shall be in compliance with Crystal City Code.
❑ All lighting shall be in compliance with Crystal City Code.
❑ '
No longer applicable.
❑ The plans submitted with the building permit shall include the following changes:
*There will be a turn around space installed on the east side of the trash enclosure. This is
necessary to allow egress from the northernmost parking space.
*The landscape plan shall be revised to show the correct location of the trash enclosure
and the turn around space.
The Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the request for City Council
consideration. The City Council will consider the request at their next regular meeting on
February 20"
SITE PLAN REVIEW - REVISED - 5231 & 5237 DOUGLAS DRIVE
2
S Cron Fence
Tu4N-A*4wNc VACC
s- H.nxss.
nn - jaw err.
87 . a I7�
na M•rAz ��
/ asnn t`
nes. q Y
I
j�)PROPOSED BUILDING
FIMSYIED FLOOR 87787
r wanp TOP OF BLOCK = 876.37 r
mass nab n••
w ser. nate
w ele ase
SERVICE
52nd AVE�UE
w0
PRESSURE TAP TO EXISTING 6' UTE VALVE
WATER COORDINATE WITH
PUBLIC WORKS
CONSTRUCT
MH OVER
EXIST. ST. S.
= 873.58
863.59
VERIFY)
® ]731 p - . Itc,a a_asT x • O y •- •. L
77.61 J6. 4 1 T ': I • ••d
•Z�i • .I• GI
•n. a e
,4!7 .rias• / Orr I I I I € .. ' I Q ! - I'•
165 ,Sao a I $ �, •!•• uy
• / ' i I SILT FENCI
E
� �•_�'
_1b
h/ 111 I I a° �• f a
]5.35 / > a" • I.
is
7.
a
s �C
6
aagn,A.J
A.
k.
74.60
V - )4.y ♦ s Yom' .uc I I •' . u Q (Y.eR I.w
^^ 'Ilea a> 4 *i B4IIIL ex.- )(.ff11 • • I a ,, yI
Ixa a eivwNais e ` sit r �
I ` f •�'
I • �f I1Ir,
A.
v w�v �._ � � � � � V•1a iK e�•-. �� 4�a •_• L• •I •.
ss s. ,sim s.v s�wr u..s ss'�'� - �":�i • 4. If �• i'I
TOP 874 •
I `
INV. 870.00 •. • t . , r. il•
CONNECT TO O(ISTING TEMPORARY ROCK c s.K -,L •-"F a,� 5. ' r ••I
SANITARY 5EWER STUB CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IJ • . y•
INV. 858.10 III[ _ • - 4. I .
(FIELD VERIFY) [ •. �-
G R A 0 1 N G N O T E S:
/, All proposed grades shown are finished grades. rrmdea at points between spot elevation
W contours are determined by uniform slopes between the given grades.
2. All proposed spot elevations at curblins. are shown are to bottom of curb (gutterline)
unless otherwise indicated.
3. Remove all unsuitable material (organic soils, uncontrolled fill, debris, and natural or
artificial obstructions) in the zone from 1 m (3.28 feet) below the finished subgrade to
finished subgrcde in the proposed pavemdnt areas.
4. Compact backfill in oil utility trenches to 95% Standard Proctor maximum dry density
(ASTM 0698-78 or PASHTO T-99) from the pipe zone to within 1 m (3.28 feet) below
the finished subgrade, and 100% Standanf Proctor maximum dry density in the final 1 m
(3.28 feet). Provide density tests in bockfes and Fill. placed beneath footings. slobs. and
pavements- At least one compaction test Is required for every 100 feet of trench at
vertical intervals not exceeding two feet.
5. Compact all fill placed in pavement areas in accordance with MN02.j
Dtasdord. Spaeiftaelioo
-
2105.3.F1 (Specified Density Method). Compact all fill placed under buildings in
accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineer.
S. Comply with the requirements of O.S.HA. 29 CFR, Port 1926, Subpart P. 'Excavations and
Trenches.'
Test roll the building and pavement areas. in the presence of the GeatechnicW Engineer.
Perform base preparation and test rolling prior to curb and gutter construction, placing of
grovel base, sand/gravel sub -base, bituminous stabilized base, or plant mixed bituminous
base on all street and pavement areas. Test roll the area between 300 mm (12 inches)
outside of the back of the curbs on either side of the paved areas. Use a heavy
pneumotm-tired miler, towed by suitable tractive equipment, with two wheels spaced not
Isthan 1,800 mm (71 inches) apart (transversely center to center), tire size equal to
18x24 or 18x25 (18' wide) inflated to a pressure of 650 kPa (94 psi), and a gross
moss of the roller not less than 13.5 metric tons (14.9 tons) and not more than 13.7
area
in a
metric tons (15.1 tons). Test roll the above specified amanner Such that each
Part of the area comes in contact with one of the liras at least once. Operate the
hoary roller at a speed of not less than 4 km/h (2,5 mph) and not more then 8 km/h
S rah. The hl
sup rade shall
1 ba considered unstable / of the time that the h roller
( P a 9 cavy
passes over the subgrode, the surface Showa yielding or rutting of more than 50 mm (2
inches), measured from the original surface to the bottom of the nit. Correct any soft
spots or displacements which appear during the test rolling by scarifying, oerating or
watering, and recompacting as required to obtain stability; or by excavating to solid
material and backfilling with material suitable for base construction. Remove material
such as vegetation, rubbish, large stones. ;peat, and wet cloy. Retest the area after
Can, tion.
8. Perform sail correction procedures and compaction ,n pecardonce with the soils report
9. In oreas where the proposed grade adjacent to the curb lin slopes upward or downward.
grade the first 5 feet of town area parallel to the curb line at a 20:1 slope before
making the transition to 3:1
10. Excavate the building area to the designated bottom of excavation (BE(). Coordinate
inspection and approval of the bottom of all foundation excavations with the Geotechnical
Engineer.
11. Coordinate inspection and approval of all fill material prior to placement within the building
and Pavement areas with the Geotechnical Engineer.
12. Conduct oil grading operations in a manner that minimizes the potential for site erosion.
13. Grade the site tothe finished elevations shown on the plan. Import embankment material,
ave and dispose of excess excavation material as required. Provide waste areas or
disposal sites far excess material ncl.dinq, but not limited to, excavated material or
bra ken concrete that is not desirable to be incorporated into the work involved on this
project.
t4. In areas where fill is placed on slopes sleeper then 5:1, horizontally bench the slope. in
order to increase the bond between the slope and the proposed embankment.
S T O R M S E W E R N O T E S.
1. Unless otherwise indicated, se reinforced, precast, concrete maintenance holes and
catchbasins conforming to ASTM C478, furnished with water stop rubber gaskets and
precast bases. Joints for all precast maintenance hole sections shall have confined,
rubber '0' -ring gaskets in accordance with ASTM 0923. The ;nside barrel diameter shall
not be lees than 48 Inches.
2. Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and fittings shall conform to ASTM C76. Cesgn C, with
circular reinforcing for the class of pipe specified. Use Class IV RCP for pipes 21' and
larger. Use Class V RCP for pipes 18' and smaller. Joints shot[ be Bureau of
Reclamation type R-4, with confined rubber '0' ring goskets in accordance with ASTM
0361.
3. Use Neenah R-3067-DR/DL casting with curb box, or approved equal, on C8 31 and ;Y2.
Use Neenah R-1733 home with solid Gd, or approved equal, on MH J3.
4. Perform trench excavations for alt utilities in accordance with the requirements of O.S.HA
29 CFR. Port 1926, Subpart P. 'Excavations and Trenches.'
5. Depress the tops of manholes and catchbosins in poved press 0.5 ;nehes (12.7 mm).
Depress the tops of all catchbosins in guttenines 2.0 inches (50.8 mm). The top
elevations shown on the plan reflect the pavement elevation adjacent to the manhole or
catchbeain, not the depressed elevation.
6. Test oil portions of storm sewer that are within 10 feet of buildings. within 10 feet of
buried water, lines. within 50 feet of water wells, or that pass through sal or water
identified as being contaminated ;n accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code section
4715.2820. Coordinate the testing with the City Public Works Department. Notify the City
at least 24 hours prior to any testing.
V
SEE SHEETS 01 AND
C3 FOR ADDITIONAL
NOTES AND DETAILS.
SUNDE
ENGINEERING
INC.INC.
4IOC WEST OLO SWKOPEE ROAD
eLCOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55437
(612) 861-3344
KELLETT
BUILDERS
CRYSTAL, MN
GRADING AND
UTILITY PLAN
DATE REvSroN
8/28/00 - ORIGINAL 9,v, DATE
10/8/00 GRADES
10/11/00 GRADES
10/28/00 SFTEPtAv
11/9/00 ENTRANCE GRAOEs
129 01 NEW SITEPLAN. CRAOES
i
I
I
I
I HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS RUN,
SPECIFICATION. OR REPORT NAS
PREPARED e1' ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM
A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER rHE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF i41NNESCIA
NAME
DATE: a/26/CC REG. NO, e731
0..N eY
4RK
R
GMS
DATE:
e/21/cc
my
2 ST. S. ce
APPROVED 8f:
GMS
PROJECT NO.:
Cc -674
o.:ia'`�i•N TOP 87435
A , w-ns`n-ii-osis tw. w 86438
ranr°°."re ra w
I I
I
r !� _ .:C',•.
• -
r
-875
I I
7 I
r
®74.52
75.3
it
�
21'
PA.
r..
875
A.
I
I
a 8,6
xg
�.
as
ty.i
Je.3J
sa5a`ri[ QO4 ws N,
_I
I • • I
•I •�.
`I..
,
CONSTRUCT
MH OVER
EXIST. ST. S.
= 873.58
863.59
VERIFY)
® ]731 p - . Itc,a a_asT x • O y •- •. L
77.61 J6. 4 1 T ': I • ••d
•Z�i • .I• GI
•n. a e
,4!7 .rias• / Orr I I I I € .. ' I Q ! - I'•
165 ,Sao a I $ �, •!•• uy
• / ' i I SILT FENCI
E
� �•_�'
_1b
h/ 111 I I a° �• f a
]5.35 / > a" • I.
is
7.
a
s �C
6
aagn,A.J
A.
k.
74.60
V - )4.y ♦ s Yom' .uc I I •' . u Q (Y.eR I.w
^^ 'Ilea a> 4 *i B4IIIL ex.- )(.ff11 • • I a ,, yI
Ixa a eivwNais e ` sit r �
I ` f •�'
I • �f I1Ir,
A.
v w�v �._ � � � � � V•1a iK e�•-. �� 4�a •_• L• •I •.
ss s. ,sim s.v s�wr u..s ss'�'� - �":�i • 4. If �• i'I
TOP 874 •
I `
INV. 870.00 •. • t . , r. il•
CONNECT TO O(ISTING TEMPORARY ROCK c s.K -,L •-"F a,� 5. ' r ••I
SANITARY 5EWER STUB CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IJ • . y•
INV. 858.10 III[ _ • - 4. I .
(FIELD VERIFY) [ •. �-
G R A 0 1 N G N O T E S:
/, All proposed grades shown are finished grades. rrmdea at points between spot elevation
W contours are determined by uniform slopes between the given grades.
2. All proposed spot elevations at curblins. are shown are to bottom of curb (gutterline)
unless otherwise indicated.
3. Remove all unsuitable material (organic soils, uncontrolled fill, debris, and natural or
artificial obstructions) in the zone from 1 m (3.28 feet) below the finished subgrade to
finished subgrcde in the proposed pavemdnt areas.
4. Compact backfill in oil utility trenches to 95% Standard Proctor maximum dry density
(ASTM 0698-78 or PASHTO T-99) from the pipe zone to within 1 m (3.28 feet) below
the finished subgrade, and 100% Standanf Proctor maximum dry density in the final 1 m
(3.28 feet). Provide density tests in bockfes and Fill. placed beneath footings. slobs. and
pavements- At least one compaction test Is required for every 100 feet of trench at
vertical intervals not exceeding two feet.
5. Compact all fill placed in pavement areas in accordance with MN02.j
Dtasdord. Spaeiftaelioo
-
2105.3.F1 (Specified Density Method). Compact all fill placed under buildings in
accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineer.
S. Comply with the requirements of O.S.HA. 29 CFR, Port 1926, Subpart P. 'Excavations and
Trenches.'
Test roll the building and pavement areas. in the presence of the GeatechnicW Engineer.
Perform base preparation and test rolling prior to curb and gutter construction, placing of
grovel base, sand/gravel sub -base, bituminous stabilized base, or plant mixed bituminous
base on all street and pavement areas. Test roll the area between 300 mm (12 inches)
outside of the back of the curbs on either side of the paved areas. Use a heavy
pneumotm-tired miler, towed by suitable tractive equipment, with two wheels spaced not
Isthan 1,800 mm (71 inches) apart (transversely center to center), tire size equal to
18x24 or 18x25 (18' wide) inflated to a pressure of 650 kPa (94 psi), and a gross
moss of the roller not less than 13.5 metric tons (14.9 tons) and not more than 13.7
area
in a
metric tons (15.1 tons). Test roll the above specified amanner Such that each
Part of the area comes in contact with one of the liras at least once. Operate the
hoary roller at a speed of not less than 4 km/h (2,5 mph) and not more then 8 km/h
S rah. The hl
sup rade shall
1 ba considered unstable / of the time that the h roller
( P a 9 cavy
passes over the subgrode, the surface Showa yielding or rutting of more than 50 mm (2
inches), measured from the original surface to the bottom of the nit. Correct any soft
spots or displacements which appear during the test rolling by scarifying, oerating or
watering, and recompacting as required to obtain stability; or by excavating to solid
material and backfilling with material suitable for base construction. Remove material
such as vegetation, rubbish, large stones. ;peat, and wet cloy. Retest the area after
Can, tion.
8. Perform sail correction procedures and compaction ,n pecardonce with the soils report
9. In oreas where the proposed grade adjacent to the curb lin slopes upward or downward.
grade the first 5 feet of town area parallel to the curb line at a 20:1 slope before
making the transition to 3:1
10. Excavate the building area to the designated bottom of excavation (BE(). Coordinate
inspection and approval of the bottom of all foundation excavations with the Geotechnical
Engineer.
11. Coordinate inspection and approval of all fill material prior to placement within the building
and Pavement areas with the Geotechnical Engineer.
12. Conduct oil grading operations in a manner that minimizes the potential for site erosion.
13. Grade the site tothe finished elevations shown on the plan. Import embankment material,
ave and dispose of excess excavation material as required. Provide waste areas or
disposal sites far excess material ncl.dinq, but not limited to, excavated material or
bra ken concrete that is not desirable to be incorporated into the work involved on this
project.
t4. In areas where fill is placed on slopes sleeper then 5:1, horizontally bench the slope. in
order to increase the bond between the slope and the proposed embankment.
S T O R M S E W E R N O T E S.
1. Unless otherwise indicated, se reinforced, precast, concrete maintenance holes and
catchbasins conforming to ASTM C478, furnished with water stop rubber gaskets and
precast bases. Joints for all precast maintenance hole sections shall have confined,
rubber '0' -ring gaskets in accordance with ASTM 0923. The ;nside barrel diameter shall
not be lees than 48 Inches.
2. Reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and fittings shall conform to ASTM C76. Cesgn C, with
circular reinforcing for the class of pipe specified. Use Class IV RCP for pipes 21' and
larger. Use Class V RCP for pipes 18' and smaller. Joints shot[ be Bureau of
Reclamation type R-4, with confined rubber '0' ring goskets in accordance with ASTM
0361.
3. Use Neenah R-3067-DR/DL casting with curb box, or approved equal, on C8 31 and ;Y2.
Use Neenah R-1733 home with solid Gd, or approved equal, on MH J3.
4. Perform trench excavations for alt utilities in accordance with the requirements of O.S.HA
29 CFR. Port 1926, Subpart P. 'Excavations and Trenches.'
5. Depress the tops of manholes and catchbosins in poved press 0.5 ;nehes (12.7 mm).
Depress the tops of all catchbosins in guttenines 2.0 inches (50.8 mm). The top
elevations shown on the plan reflect the pavement elevation adjacent to the manhole or
catchbeain, not the depressed elevation.
6. Test oil portions of storm sewer that are within 10 feet of buildings. within 10 feet of
buried water, lines. within 50 feet of water wells, or that pass through sal or water
identified as being contaminated ;n accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code section
4715.2820. Coordinate the testing with the City Public Works Department. Notify the City
at least 24 hours prior to any testing.
V
SEE SHEETS 01 AND
C3 FOR ADDITIONAL
NOTES AND DETAILS.
SUNDE
ENGINEERING
INC.INC.
4IOC WEST OLO SWKOPEE ROAD
eLCOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55437
(612) 861-3344
KELLETT
BUILDERS
CRYSTAL, MN
GRADING AND
UTILITY PLAN
DATE REvSroN
8/28/00 - ORIGINAL 9,v, DATE
10/8/00 GRADES
10/11/00 GRADES
10/28/00 SFTEPtAv
11/9/00 ENTRANCE GRAOEs
129 01 NEW SITEPLAN. CRAOES
i
I
I
I
I HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS RUN,
SPECIFICATION. OR REPORT NAS
PREPARED e1' ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM
A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER rHE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF i41NNESCIA
NAME
DATE: a/26/CC REG. NO, e731
0..N eY
4RK
CHECKED x:
GMS
DATE:
e/21/cc
SCALE:
'-C'
APPROVED 8f:
GMS
PROJECT NO.:
Cc -674
SHEET NO,
C2
2 OF 3
i
'ta6i ARAiIi
exa we 1
.. , s.,,e.n_N_esa nGO°`we ,.rai15 • I I , •�, °
s�s�wv[wgw[N I •• � K� �1y{�{7tn/G -n..a I �• � � �
r`" PARKIN TBA
STE S
s' I I '1. •e•II • t
810.75• 'f � .na>a raXoert �.Iay.
�RASH
W RE
.� ami aenn' A°• ..nor• .enn .e7a m a 141='ta> F •�
/�mtl Igy al a 1 �•
'
nasi I •� V I l I I I ♦ i i
Ie I e .. a[• Q
�I -•nA aaa I V S.d i I Orli •�_�� •..
p r uv Z
PROPOSED ^` I JI 5 WI � _t ± s~ `•
Z ys,
FENCE .gi na» .mvv a» rau 7,I §:5 •� . �' �•• a
�O1I • 4 < 8 4f r• I.. I• ( ••
�_ -- sw m ( • ea raw .
PORCH f
lei
iAw a u.. NI {�,e•>u ' I � •
MP
i ,ae s� I �'� O s. • y
e)•Y �_
eY ells f10Q [W 4uerzR N I ' � • ' <<.�
7- .1
Ian .nisi .A,a rasa 9• u I - -s. •Y'1 2 S81
P S
Ora Rw,23• I I I' v i
�•.is• •• •.. li ''•
S I T E P L A N N O T E S:
1. Existing boundary, location, topographic, and utility information shown on this plan is
from a field survey by Kemper and Associates. Ina. doled 2/11/99.
2. Pavement Section (Base Bid): Surfacing to be used for the construction of the
driveways and parking area shall be as follows:
Standard Pavement Areas:
1.5• MNOOT SPEC.
- 2331, TYPE 41 BIT.
WEAR COURSE(a,c)
- 1.5' MNOOT SPEC.
2331, TYPE 31 BIT.
BASE COURSE(a,c)
8' MNOOT SPEC. 3138
CLASS 5 AGGREGATE
BASE (1005 CRUSHED)(b)
(a) Compact each lift to a minimum 95% of the Marshall density in accordance with
MNOOT SPEC. 2331.3.H2.
(b) Compact each lift to a minimum 1005 of the maximum density in accordance
with MNOOT SPEC. 2211.3.0 1.
(c) Use MNOOT SPEC. 3139 Aggregate Class A.
3. All dimensions are to face of curb unless otherwise indicated.
4. All curb radii shall be three (3) feet minimum unfess othennse noted.
approved 5. Designate all parking stalls with white d' wide surface markings.
6. White surface markings (letters and symbols) shall be in conformance with the
Standard Alphabets for Highway Signs and Pavement Markings. FHA (HiQ=20). --
7. Install and maintain access roods throughout all stages of construction. Temporary
access roods must be approved by the Fire Department before construction starts.
8. Fire extingubhen must be on-site and ovadable throughout the construction site
dull g
duoil stages of construction.
9. Smoking is prohibited at the construction site except for approved areas designated by
the Fre Department. 'NO SMOKING' signs must be provided by the Contractor.
10. All cutting and winding must meet the requirements of Article 49 of the Uniform Fire
Code.
11. Storage and handling of flammable liquids shall meet the requirements of Article 79 of
the Uniform Fire Cade.
12. Do not black access to building• fire hydrants. or other fire appliances with
construction materials.
13. Provide fire lane Mgnoge os required by the Fire Deportment.
14. All new curb and gutter shall be type 8-612 nstalled in accordance with MNOOT
Standard Spec. 2531 and MNOOT Standard Plate 71000.
15. Typical full size 90' parking stalls are 9' x 18' (non -handicapped) unless otherwise
indicated.vanc
16. Provide Ade and Construction Zone Signing 'nctuding. but not limited to, signs for
Ione closures, low shoulder, uneven lanee, and fresh oil (other items as applicable).
The number and location of these signs will be determined by the Contractors
operations
9 tt. . I 0 er >,a I I w g•y e /V 17. Portland cement cgnerete for curb and gutter and sidewalk shall be 3900 psi m
• a ra I r [oa I / 28 dogs compressive strep th with 5.05 ou erit.inin Concrete aggregates shall, be
m
4^Y ra .• .n•n .° `9r'» +w '• 5'• I ••� I ry I • '� N 4•• Iree of organic impurities, chert. shote, or otner deletereious substances.
n I I V LL a
,• �a rye ,> 1. i s• I Q F:. �. , • 18. Preformed expansion joints using 0.5' thickness shall be placed at each end of curb
/ L - `_e - ( T > e I I ■ D radius, at intersections. and approximately every 200 feet.
CPwJeR 'P - - _ _ _ - 22' BUILDING S TBACK LINE ,tns
Q• �• I•' 19. Contraction joints shall be spaced at 10 foot intervals in the curb and gutter.
J. 20. Structurally support steps. stoops, and exterior slabs at each entry into the building on
rwwxx O g$ w fin., t•_ frost -depth footings. Provide ct least d nches of void space between the bottoms of
^ • •¢e aevA» +nisi 2 d� ��• r the M.P. stoop. or slab and the underlying soil in order to allow for soil heave. Dowl
all abutting walkways into the sloops.
21. Unless 0th -i.. indicated, provide control joints, construction joints, and .pardon
joints slabs o glade,sidewalks, and drives as
i n specified in section 03300.
5• PA I�I!AK UNE _ 1 _ n rT - I •• � .. �`
^ R^a• S-� ,�,' s ' _`8 N---i-.s _K °�-•�/*r•-V'- --.n_ 22. Construct 2' toper at the free and of all concrete curb and gutter sections.
- � .axe`VI r ! � � �; � -• r,
n.e els o .-xA- � - e'-,, ,r a / rys oac I�aai.aa`ttt a ax R 8 L F�our.E •••<• I • •I •• , •°. � �.fe • <�.v 10 C 10 '<C
-� - s ��/ % •I1 SCALE IN FEET
1� .� T
' [vu v rlixreue er' R i � .
•f -� I `� [
52nd AVENUEis
exA.we,wc exec .air s aT wen 1• I < • Ti I • �`• •� `•.
To
STAMe C+IJK
ocNrFurzo e-
aetc srau vv �
wXTC 'Sapp a•G aoRDER
YYC Gar rlOUW
141T ep[CaT°Ra(D
NrA, SK.N Ta nATW
SK aGM
r UILVANeD, srC[L
nAC
SEE SHEETS C2 AND I \. �•• .I :I. .� -� �.ae [a. Are
C3 FOR ADDITI
ONAL
NOTES AND DETAILS.
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN
aeonaNs
ax.aw,e
TT
r +, ,/r en,l pRn• a,+
Na SCJ4E
SUNDE��
ENGINEERING
INC.
420C '.'ZEST CLO S-OPEE ROAD
2LGOMINGTCN, MINN" TA 55.77
(6,2) 88+-374.
KELLEI-T
BUILDERS
CRYSTAL, MN
SITE PLAN
PATE REVISKON
e 20 00 oRanNN. RAN DALE
10/5/00 GRADES
+0/25/op SnEPAN
+2/23/00 CRAOE& PORW
+/29/0+ NEW WrERANe
t
I HERELY CERTIFY THAT NIS PUN,
sFECIFtGt+pX,
OR REPORT WAS
PREPARED 8Y E OR uNOER w
OMECT SVFER -ION ANO NAT I AM
OVLY LCENSEO PROFESSKINAL
ENCINEER DER NE UtK_ OF 'NE
STATE 3F MINNESOTA
NAME
GME: !/ze/cc.REG 40.: 2734
ORAwN X:
MRK
O ECKED 8Y-
GMS
DATE:
5/28/CC
APFRCVED 8Y.
Gus
PRGECT NO.:
cC-674
I
SHEET NO. I J
C1
i
1 OF 3
,a M
A
COMPACT AMERICAN VIBURNUM (II)
BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (1)
NORTHWOODS MAPLE (2)
SENTRY LINDEN (5)
3 LITTLE PKINGE55 5PIKEA
3 GOLDFLAME 5PIKEA I DWARF WINGED EUONYMU5
IMPATIENS
30 BOSTON IVY 5' O.G. AT FENCE I I DWARF WINGED EUONYFMS �f
I -Z F/7
T— I ANTHONY WATERER 5PIKEA I
AUTUMN JOY SEDUM (17)
7 TAUNTON YEW (6)
j TURF
JAPANESE TREE LILAC (2)
SITE \
TRIANGLE \
SETBACK
1 GOLDFLAME 51"IREA.I 1 I 5 GOLDFLAME 5PIKEA
FLAGSTONE STEPPERS
6 RED TWIG pOGWOOD 3 KED TWIG DOGWOOD
BIRD FEEDERS
3 LITTLE PRINGE55 5PIKEA
PROPOSED DENTAL OFFICE
TAUNTON YEW (13) -1
LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA (3) J
STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY (25)
CHAMPLAIN RED SHRUB ROSE (5)
TURF
DOUGLAS DRIVE
TURF
A
3' PRIVACY FENCE
3
ti RED TWIG pcDGWOOD
3 GOLDFLAME 5PIKEA 11
,COMPACT AMERICAN VIBURNUM (1)
KROSSA REGAL'HOSTA (53)
STELLA DE ORO DAYLILT (6)
BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (I)
I
�-�— Tum-gRow►� bP/�C�
yEXISTING
HOUSE
1
I
1 �
Q
z
z � �
� G
_i
z ¢ \J
z
11�
W
O � Q
W.. 00
ZZ..
U�WcW
Cn Q E-- j .
W C Q W
0 0 D ac
O
Q N
U
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Planning Commission (February 12" meeting — Item #3)
FROM: ohn Sutter, Planner and Redevelopment Coordinator
SUBJECT: Consider revisions to previously approved Planned Unit Development
submitted by SVK Development (applicant and owner) to reduce the
building setback from the north and east boundaries of the plat of Parkside
Acres Second Addition.
The developer is requesting a modification to the previously approved Planned Unit
Development. The modification would be to eliminate the setback requirement of 30' from the
north and east edges of the plat, so that the standard setback in the P.U.D. ordinance would
apply. This request would be a minor amendment to the Parkside Acres P.U.D.; minor
amendments require only Planning Commission approval (515.52 Subd. 6).
Our P.U.D. ordinance requires that a building may not be nearer than its building height to any
property line. It also requires a 30' setback from any abutting street right-of-way. Because
only the south side of this P.U.D. abuts a public street, only the south side is required to have
a 30' setback. However, the site plan for the P.U.D. showed a 30' setback on all sides
including the north, east and west sides. The developer is asking to reduce the north and east
setbacks so that they are consistent with the setbacks required by ordinance. Attached are
drawings showing the setbacks with the current site plan as proposed by the developer.
Staff has the following comments on this request:
❑ This is not a reduction in our P.U.D. standard; it is the return to the standard established in
our ordinance (building height) instead of the setback shown in the developer's site plan.
❑ The only abutting properties affected by this change would be Glen Haven Memorial
Gardens and the ten single family lots along Zane Avenue. The setback along the
cemetery will be at least 25' due to the presence of 25' easements along the property line;
this change will have no significant impact because the abutting property is not used for
residential purposes. In the case of the 10 lots along Zane, they are owned by the
developer so there will be no effect on other property owners.
❑ The developer is requesting this change because, now that they have a model for potential
buyers to see, they are getting more requests for a two -bedrooms -on -the -main -floor option.
To build such a unit, they will need the flexibility to base the setback on building height.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this request.
PARKSIDE ACRES 2ND ADDITI. II.
60
.. ...........
N89'42'43'E
594-95
DRAINAGE AND UPLITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE AND UT7UTy EASEMENT
r- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - ZO-0 — — — — — — — — — — ---
t 35-00 124.01 ---
rn
N89'42*43"E
16,-1
'-c
10 ,
3E I
17
.00 r�r" 3
66
0,0 OnA 2 13.,pm
25 61' "'E"gC:
." wt
35
12
35.00 35.00
'-55
cs
70 7t
P30
;6z; ;6 J
'�a�j 63.46
3 2
A10.
6a?,
25
22 < <
53
30
0
29
0
76a. 24 r R74o_-
21
_f40 428 66.21
25 S66
g a�
'-NOPE
7 aj �sh �syl)
-6 1 1 1 -
"I N `ii-
>0 !I,-
ob
s7l 8jq -
CLE 3
10
tb -0
>0
2
" 7
7
lo?
L-----------------
_- 240 z_-------
66
504.10
N89*42'42"E
so 60 60
Ct s. = Rye.
:D
T
A cK_ LojE5
PAROKSIDE ACRES 2ND ADDIT
I I►
�I
60
N89*42'43"E r4
594.96
U17Ury F
ORAWAGE ANO UTIUN EASEMENT ORAINAGE ANO _AS -ENT Co
. r4 5'1� 0 I'i
r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - Z().GU.07' 04 p L — — —
t : -- — — — — — — — — -- 124.01
7, \ta
N89*42'43"E co
7. 7 so", c
57� 15o40vnE-
zs 5
17
7.
6
13 6
25
35
4,
2
62.. "z g".54,.s
7
0 -N% < 6 -:r9
0 S
7
Z>- Imo.1�3x 3P'
-37.-Go,-S
I
Nal
32
4�-
63 46 1,-- i
'Naa�
25 9
,'.65W I
Tl
o"
> <
c
P,
-8
0
1'.00 46e 's
:D
- 7
C, cl
915 23
Qi OJOOiCo
S6B*
2 'o-
4-
5 -
8
'*6
17
-0
F F A
116
ATaE a.!
ob
55 (Ij
z
s"
D \':c
an
V'To. �o 0
'10 00
v
o
7'
77
A Dl
'.53
51
'u-
- -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3,
504.10
�7 7
— -- — — — — — — — — —
p
:D
>
PRO"ED PJEPk
LOU
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 9, 2001
TO: Planning Commission (February 12" meeting — Item #4)
FROM: ohn Sutter, Planner and Redevelopment Coordinator
SUBJECT: Discussion Item: Possible lot division request, to include variances from
minimum lot area, lot depth and front yard setback, for property located at
6828 Corvallis Avenue North (P.I.D. 08-118-21-13-0041).
The subject property is a double frontage lot, facing both Corvallis Avenue and 51St Place. A
house was built on the property in 1930; it faces south (toward Corvallis Avenue). A 40' x 40'
street easement was taken in 1960 to allow the creation of a cul-de-sac on 51St Place. This
easement included language that it would be returned to the property owner if 51St Place were
ever extended to the west so that the cul-de-sac would be removed.
The property owner has approached staff about the possibility of dividing the lot into two lots.
- The existing house would remain on the south/Corvallis lot (although the garage would be
have to be relocated) and a new house would be built on the north/51St lot.
Without the cul-de-sac easement, this lot division would comply with all City requirements.
However, due to the easement two variances and vacation/realignment of part of the
easement would be necessary for the north lot to accommodate a new house. Specifically:
1. Without any changes to the easement, the north lot would have an area of approximately
6,200 sq. ft. Our ordinance requires 7,500 sq. ft., meaning that a 1,300 sq. ft. variance
would be required.
2. After vacation of part of the easement and realignment of the easement line, the north lot
would have an area of approximately 6,900 sq. ft.. Our ordinance requires 7,500,
meaning that a 600 sq. ft. variance would have to be granted.
3. The setback as measured from the realigned easement line would have to be reduced
from the standard 30' to 15'.
Staff believes that arguments could be made both for and against this variance:
• The main argument for is that the lot would have been big enough to divide and build on
except for the extra easement taken in 1960 to build the cul-de-sac. The hardship was
created by the City's need for right-of-way. The second argument for is that the variances
eliminate a double frontage lot which we would not allow in a new subdivision. The third
argument for is that there would be no negative impacts if the variances were granted.
• The main argument against is that any hardship existed when the present owner purchased
the property in 1976, and thus is self-created. (Note: This is a particularly strong argument
against granting any variance, including the ones that would be requested in this case.)
Attached for review and discussion are the following items:
❑ plat map showing location of the subject property;
❑ sketch showing existing conditions;
❑ sketch showing lot division with lot area variance;
❑ sketch showing lot division with lot area variance and easement vacation; and
❑ sketch showing lot division with lot area variance, easement vacation and 15' front yard
setback variance.
DISCUSSION ITEM - POSSIBLE LOT SPLIT AT 6828 CORVALLIS
2
NO.L..iL,�,t;1 lD /- �1 3 V 4 V p tL,'q�44
Apo
CWo D "� IAVE
4
'19 G 5 2nd Alk lu ;e.,�►'>••
"� 3 60 60 tt(fi L. s ..-
3, 4 a 2 , 3
,F8 Q � o \ yl � �; L e. � .7 \`•F JiI Ij o ti $ 1 � vii I Z � $ 1 {�'1
C VCT
ZY /34.52/63w.1// 1PLACE
/6/,89 wl le,•� r0 ._.
1 R O 131 /63 59 /96.30 YOO.GS //�.3,3� '.....-a-- - -- -• ._.� _
NEW HOPE � JAYFLO cI15� HOR5E a
.2SUBDIVISION• (7000)LINE
r N
4 ° S 6 Zip.94
m
P A R K
I3o-i� /63.iG .77.13..,. S O O
I i /64.4 • / d r...• ..
13 4.5
3 3'017.70) 08•'15
w. brnr fs 6 tl. 6 0 " (3g2 3. c
6C.o1 c.o 694 iS5
Tis Z Y (3 830) 16. vl
--�•- GC.45 A 1 o n v
9oa 133.0 Ii«�� o •.1 o a �oa2 � �® - $ 4 a � - � � h 1,e1 a.
UT.OT A
MIT a PLACE NdV 1
j�
`10
�
h
S. R. K N eo,l� o - a . 2" I Z2 - z-,- - y; c ItZr9 al5 ("
63 77.5) 74,5,
ao D N tv I�� v �'^ J '... '�r\r/ •u79 .� 3 1/% (, Y
�Q�•, n° ° I 2 3 \ w. s !.i '' N fp L] 2 4 0 3 ,►/ ��i Q a
We$
s
OO 2 7"ti l.9068-95 .45 /70
-SO 48.65 62,5 62.5
• \ n, �i�L�n. \0 y' 0 1 T70 70 70 foo l00 so 4
EM A S. o CO VAL IS o �.�s a �. -15 65
`t, W �� o . ar. �� -PHIL IPS AOD. " i T RRA E N �� 8.�
,( p, 6a76 Go '7D /. o G8.95. 3 I �q l'h O `►{h �� �`'� 5,
/ Q O 6896 62.5 62.5 70
(,3,69 63,59 70 7p O ° S
= 70 66.67 LG.67 fG.K �.If 67.77 1 G8 68 70 \�
70 0 C4 /"` 7O 5 Z 7.
9J L92 67
C4
,92 70 7p
j1 ti ,
Z p
h h
63.63 63,62 63.63 d O GG.L 48
LL
03 0 th. ---_- _ „ G16.4,4.... ---
o. .. _ .. a Ifj.f fo. 113.6 0. •- - .. ^. •
(-
7.
L I2 t3. ►. Ic. tr. 9p
~ U.
Aft P
G 1
lio
l »«
SitCWAeW
1
coo
I
t
1I r
t
Bu iLDAIB LE L of Ar2EA
W rFHOUT EASEMEM7
OG4-T(ON 012 F72OtJT
` AR -A SCT-8AGC VAR.)
C6Ni.Y LOT ARSA VAA*lc-r)
Af►2* 6
8wWAU.6 LOT ApzA
OF FASEftWVT;'
V"-rV> Wr
fWc-0 —I YAQ-D S&-TI-5XK
VARIANCE, i
Lt'
Arfrzgc.
B(A I LDA13LE; Lor AazA
V411H POP—MotJ OF
Sk;Vr�M V41CA-TED AND
FgcwT Y.,vRb
VA&4 AW.E,
NN
MW FftPCgr'Y Cam
L
IN
-72-
f l
ail -