The URL can be used to link to this page

2005.01.10 PC Meeting PacketCRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SUMMARY January 10, 2005 7:00 p.m. Crystal City Hall — Council Chambers 4141 Douglas Dr N A. CALL TO ORDER B. ANNUAL ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING 1. Election of Officers. • Chairperson • Vice -Chairperson • Secretary 2. Approval of Meeting Calendar and Application Due Dates for 2005.* C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • December 13, 2004 regular meeting.* D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consider Application 2004-17 for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a new TCF Bank at 6830 56th Avenue North (former Tin Alley Grill site).* E. OLD BUSINESS 1. Consider Application 2004-15 for Variances to reduce the front and side setbacks at 4628 Hampshire Avenue North (item.continued from December 13, 2004 meeting).* F. NEW BUSINESS G. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City Council actions on recent Planning Commission items.* 2. Development Status Report for quarter ending December 31, 2004.* 3. Planning Commission roster as of January 2005.* 4. Staff preview of likely agenda items for February 14, 2005 meeting. H. OPEN FORUM I. ADJOURNMENT *Items for which supporting material will be included in the meeting packet. ME M OR AN D_U M DATE: January 4, 2005 TO: Planning Commission (January 10th meeting) FROM: 0_1hn Sutter, Planner and Redevelopment Coordinator SUBJECT: ANNUAL ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING • Election of Officers • Approval of Meeting Calendar and Application Due Dates for 2005 The Planning Commission has three officer positions, elected by the members of the commission: ■ Chairperson. Currently Richard VonRueden (since January 13, 2003). Please note that Mr. VonRueden is not eligible for re-election as Chair in 2005 because the bylaws do not permit an officer to serve more than two consecutive terms in the same position. ■ Vice Chairperson. Currently Edwin Krueger (since September 13, 2004). ■ Secretary. Currently Michelle Strand (since January 12, 2004). The duties of each officer position are described in the attached bylaws. Typically, the following procedure has been followed for each officer position: - The current Chair asks for nominations for each position. - If there is only one nomination, the Commission would fill that position by a voice vote. - If there are two or more nominations, each Commission member would vote for one of the nominated members using paper ballots which are tabulated by staff. The candidate receiving the most votes is elected to the position. In the event of a tie, a coin toss is used as a tie-breaker. One the election of officers is completed, the Commission is asked to review and approve the attached meeting calendar and application due dates for 2005. A motion to approve is requested. CITY OF CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION BY-LAWS ARTICLE L MISSION STATEMENT The role of the Crystal Planning Commission is to serve the City Council and citizens of Crystal by formulating recommendations in land use matters and by devoting the time necessary to listen to fact, to consider public input and to render decisions in an objective manner. To be successful in this role, Planning Commissioners acknowledge and honor these values: • Open-mindedness: Decisions are made free from prejudice or bias; Commissioners are receptive of new ideas and to reason. • Respect: Commissioners listen to and show respect for the opinions and positions of fellow Commissioners as well as those who come before the Commission. • Equal treatment: Everyone appearing before the Commission has the same privileges, status and rights. • Attack the problem, not the person: Personal attacks are not tolerated, but honest and informed debate is encouraged. • Offer and accept constructive criticism: Constructive comments are to be encouraged and welcomed; unfavorable judgments that find fault and fix responsibility are not. • Responsibility to the City of Crystal: The best interests of the city of Crystal are paramount and rise above parochial interests. • Shared responsibility: The Commission as a whole bears the responsibility for decisions and recommendations that are made. ARTICLE II. ORGANIZATION A. Election of Officers The officers of the Commission shall be elected by the members of the Commission at the January meeting each year. Officers shall serve for a period of one year, commencing with the first meeting of each year. The term of office for each Officer is one year, and that no Officer may serve for more than two consecutive years in the same position. B. Officers The officers of the Commission shall be a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson and Secretary. In addition, there shall be an official administrative secretary who need not be a member of the Commission. PLANNING COMMISION BYLAWS - APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 11/19/02 Page 1 of 3 C. Duties The Chairperson shall preside at all meetings of the Commission, shall have such powers of the supervision and management as may pertain to the office of the Chairperson. 2. The Vice Chairperson shall preside and perform all duties of the Chairperson in the event of the Chairperson's absence, disqualification or disability. 3. The Secretary shall be responsible for administrative work necessary for the operations of the Planning Commission, unless city staff has been directed by the City Manager to assume these administrative duties. In the absence of the Secretary, a temporary Secretary may be appointed by the presiding officer to fulfill the duties of Secretary at that meeting. The Secretary shall keep the minutes of all meetings and all records of the Commission. Minutes of the meetings shall be mailed or delivered to all Commission members and shall include the notice and the agenda for the next regular meeting. The Secretary shall notify all members of any special meeting of the Commission. Approved minutes shall be provided to the City Council in the next available meeting packet or newsbrief. In addition to these administrative duties, in the absence of the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, the Secretary shall preside and perform all duties of the Chairperson in the event of the Chairperson's absence, disqualification or disability. 4. It shall be the duty of each member to notify the administrative secretary if such meeting cannot be attended. D. Task Force Task forces shall be formed when deemed necessary by the Chairperson. Such Task Forces shall consist of a leader, who shall be a member of the Commission, and any number of people, members or non-members, the leader deems necessary to successfully complete the task. The Chairperson shall appoint the leader of any Task Force, keeping in mind the interests of individual members. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall be ex officio members of any Task Force formed. ARTICLE III. MEETINGS A. The Commission shall hold a minimum of twelve regular monthly meetings on the second Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m., unless otherwise set by the Commission at the January meeting of each year. In addition, the date and time for any one monthly meeting may be changed by a majority vote of the quorum. B. Quorum, consisting of a majority of the members of the Commission, shall be sufficient to transact the business of the Commission. C. The Commission may hold special meetings to complete or initiate business at the call of the Chairperson, or upon the request of three members of the Commission. PLANNING COMMISION BYLAWS -APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 11/19/02 Page 2 of 3 D. The roll shall be called at each meeting and a record of those members present or absent shall also be recorded in the minutes of such meeting. E. The order of business will be as follows: Call to Order Approval of Minutes Public Hearings Old Business New Business General Information Open Forum Adjournment ARTICLE IV. ATTENDANCE Attendance is required at all meetings. Absence from more than three regular meetings in a calendar year is not considered acceptable because it impairs the Commission's ability to fulfill its responsibilities to the community. For this reason, upon a Commissioner's fourth absence from a regular meeting within a calendar year, the Chairperson shall notify the Mayor of such absences and the City Council may take action to remove the Commissioner. All Commissioners are expected to notify city staff prior to any meeting if unable to attend. ARTICLE V. GENERAL PROVISIONS No member of the Commission shall be authorized to speak on behalf of the Commission publicly until the Commission has first considered and approved such statements. The City Council or City Manager shall be notified in advance of the nature of any public statement of official policy concerning the Commission. ARTICLE VI. AMENDMENTS These rules and procedures may be amended by a majority of the membership at a regular or special meeting. Notice of the proposed amendments shall be mailed to all members of the Commission by the Secretary prior to the meeting at which the amendments are to be voted upon. Any member of the Commission may, in writing, propose amendments to these rules and procedures. PLANNING COMMISION BYLAWS - APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 11/19/02 Page 3 of 3 Duc laces & meeting schedule for )ecial Land Use Applications 1Y. 1005 DUE DATE FOR APPLICATION, FEE, AND REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS 3% weeks before the Planning Commission meeting date. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING Typically the 2„d Monday of the month, except where indicated (*). CITY COUNCIL MEETING #1 (REQUIRED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS) Typically the 3rd Tuesday, of the month, except where indicated (*). CITY COUNCIL MEETING #2 (ONLY REQUIRED FOR ORDINANCES) Typically the 1St Tuesday of the following month, except where indicated (*). January 21, 2005 February 14, 2005 March 1 2005* March 15, 2005* February 18, 2005 March 14, 2005 April 5, 2005* April 19, 2005* March 18, 2005 April 11, 2005 April 19, 2005 May 3, 2005 April 15, 2005 May 9, 2005 May 17, 2005 June 7, 2005 May 20, 2005 June 13, 2005 June 21, 2005 July 5, 2005 June 17, 2005 July 11, 2005 July 19, 2005 August 16, 2005* July 15, 2005 August 8, 2005 August 16, 2005 September 6, 2005 August 19, 2005 September 12, 2005 September 20, 2005 October 17, 2005* September 16, 2005 October 10, 2005 October 17, 2005* November 1, 2005 October 21, 2005 November 14, 2005 December 6, 2005* December 20, 2005* November 18, 2005 December 12, 2005 December 20, 2005 January 3, 2006 December 16, 2005 January 9, 2006 January 17, 2006 February 7, 2006 1 Council meeting #2 is only required for ordinance changes such as rezonings and text amendments. Also, please note that adopted ordinance changes do not go into effect until 30 days after the ordinance is published, this means they typically are not effective until approximately six weeks after Council meeting #2. 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55422-1696 I �G QCT CITY CRYSTAL Main: 763-531-1000 ^� Fax: 763-531-1188d ee J eCi U S � 2005 City Council Meetings Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. January 4 January 18 February 1 February 15 March 1 March 15 April 5 April 19 May 3 May 17 June 7 June 21 July 5 July 19 ' August 1 August 16 September 6 September 20 *** October 3 *** October 17 November 1 November 15 December 6 December 20 ***Denotes a change in the regular meeting schedule for the City Council. Meetings are re -broadcast at 6:30 P.M. each Sunday on Channel 16 with Northwest Community Television. H: \Counci i m eeti ngd ates-2005. doc CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION December 13, 2004 A. CALL TO ORDER Page 1 of 6 The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the following present: Sears, Nystrom, Whitenack, VonRueden, Krueger, Hester, Atkinson, and Strand. Also present were the following: Planner Sutter and Recording Secretary Matthews. City Council Liaison Joselyn (arrived at 7:03 p.m.). B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Commissioner Krueger and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to approve the minutes of the November 8, 2004 regular meeting. Motion carried C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consider Application 2004-14 for a Conditional Use Permit for automobile repair -major at Asia Auto Center, 5264 West Broadway. Planner Sutter summarized the staff report and stated that staff recommends approval with a stipulation that the business may not operate before 6:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m. The applicant stated that they were looking forward to a positive comment from the commission. Public Hearing opened No one spoke. Public Hearing closed Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Strand to recommend to City Council to approve Application 2004-14 for a Conditional Use Permit for automobile repair -major at Asia Auto Center, 5264 West Broadway. Motion carried. 2. Consider Application 2004-15 for Variances to reduce the front and side setbacks at 4628 Hampshire Ave N. Planner Sutter summarized the staff report. Staff recommends not approving this application. The building permit that was issued indicated that there was a 34' setback on from the front lot line, 30' was required. It was actually built 20' from the front lot line inconsistent with the permit that was issued. The law explicitly states that nonconforming structures can not be Page 2 of 6 ara e was added with a similar error. It is unusual that both structures _.., expanded. In 1952 the g g were built inconstantly with what was indicated on the permits. a s that would r replied that there hadn't been any changes to commissioner Whitenack asked if there have butte any changes in the roa w Y Comma explain the difference wledgeback. Planner the roadways to arae Planner Sutter Commissioner Sears 5' side setback is for the dwelling or the garage. Comm asked if the replied that it was for the garage. e er asked if the existing house could be remodeled, neer Sudtter stated that s correct. Commissioner Krug compliance. addition to it, it would have to be brought into open Public Hearing. petition to Chair VonRueden with signaturlam what he wanted to do to Dave Raley presentes that are in favor of the ed a p Raley went on to exp put on his property. addition he would like top led to this situation. Raley stated that he would like to work with the property and the events that the commission to come up with a reasonable solution. ccupy the house. Raley replied that yes Chair VonRueden asked if he intended to ohe does intend to occupy. .-. Close Public Hearing Commissioner Nystrom asked if Raley would be satisfied remodeling the inside of the house. Raley replied that no, h e would not be satisfied. The bedrooms are small and the whole bathroom has to be torn out, and basement access is via an exterior stairway - has to staff and the wire the property after learning Commissioner Strand asked about the ti Rale proocteeded tohe acquire substantial amount actual closing of the house, and why M Y into the house for a sub of the setback problem. Raley re liea let at hw a the problems i ms out with the city. of money, and figured he would which would solve Chair VonRueden asked if he had seriously considered moving the garage, one of the problems. Raley replied only as a last resort. e would like the commission to continue the itern. could � building. � replied Chair VonRueden asked if Raley t he really didn't want to do that. He wanted to take care of this so he e would that art. If the garage Shot on his p footagejuare of the Commissioner Sears stated that te be expandhis seemed led on the one side. Then the feet and make it a be pushed back maybe the garage it to it that way as well. He structure would increase. This would allow' be se backn sues with doinfon-n to 1000 g e The rest of the livable home. rRaley move the breezeway and move the garage over toward the Nous would rather expansion would be to the east. Page 3 of 6 Commissioner Krueger stated that he has a problem with the 20' set back; we have normally adhered to the 30' setback. Raley replied that there are many other houses that are closer than the 20' along Hampshire, and he is willing to move the garage over to correct the side setback. Chair VonRueden asked Raley if he would like the commission to table this for 30 days or vote on it tonight. Commissioner Sears sated that he thought it would be a good idea to come back with a Plan B and the commission could table this until the next meeting. Planner Sutter stated that he does not see how staff could recommend approval, based on the lack of undue hardship, even with another set of plans. However, staff would help the owner package a new set of plans for the planning commission's consideration. Commissioner Atkinson asked what the minimum square footage for a dwelling in this area would be. Planner Sutter stated that it is 900 square feet, but one correction does not necessarily justify a variance from another requirement. Commissioner Whitenack asked what the test was for hardship. Planner Sutter explained the three criteria that have to be met by state law and city code for it to be considered a hardship. Commissioner Whitenack asked if the property value has been lessened because of this. He stated he needed to understand the hardship factors better. Planner Sutter said staff has no way of knowing what the effect on value has been. Commissioner Nystrom stated the three factors are state law and city code would make this application fail as it was presented tonight. However, she felt the commission would really like to work with the applicant. Raley stated he would bring in another plan. Planner Sutter stated staff would need the plans by January 3, 2005. No Public Hearing notices would have to go out again because this would be a continuation. Moved by Commissioner Nystrom seconded by Commissioner Strand to continue until January 10, 2005 Application 2004-15 for Variances to reduce the side and front setbacks at 4628 Hampshire Ave N. Motion carried. 3. Consider Application 2004-16 for a Variance to increase the maximum fence height at 5331 Corvallis Ave N. Planner Sutter summarized the staff report and gave a brief history on the property. Commissioner Krueger asked if the fence was on the lot line. Planner Sutter stated that the fence -� is on or within the lot lines and only the height of the fence is a compliance issue. Commissioner Strand asked if Richmond agreed to fix the fence upon purchasing the property. Planner Sutter answered yes. Page 4 of 6 The Public Hearing opened Tim Richmond stepped forward and stated he is the homeowner and the fence is 10' off of Lakeland. This house is the only house with a backyard facing Highway 81. He won in court and that should be considered by the commission. Richmond continued to explain his view of the situation and the events that took place that have led to the current situation. Richmond also requested that his money be refunded. Chair VonRueden stated that the commission will only be dealing with the fence height issue. Commissioner Krueger asked if Richmond was the owner when the January 8, 2004 letter was sent out. Richmond stated that he was not. Krueger stated that that is why the letter was not sent to Mr. Richmond; it was sent to the property owner. Commissioner Atkinson asked Mr. Richmond why if he knew it had to come down to 6', was he arguing for 8' all around. Richmond stated he didn't know, and the code was 8' when it was built. Chair VonRueden stated that the former owner built it non-compliant then transferred responsibility to Mr. Richmond. Commissioner Krueger asked if the owner told Richmond that there was a problem with the fence and that a permit wasn't issued for it. Richmond replied that it was code to have 8' and it didn't change until February 14, 2004. The city made a mistake in deciding what yard was the front and the back. Commissioner Krueger stated if the owner had taken out a permit like he was supposed to, the permit wouldn't have been approved at 8' in the front yard. Richmond stated that was wrong and he won in court. Chair VonRueden asked Planner Sutter what took place in court. Planner Sutter summarized the court case and stated that lowering the fence to 6' would gain compliance. John Meyers, from 5016 Lakeland Ave N (763-537-7758) stated that he lives next door and he is fine with the fence. The height is fine and the aesthetics are fine. Close Public Hearing. Commissioner Sears stated that all regulations do not cover every single situation. The yards differ with each owner, everyone has a different opinion. It is a good will gesture by the City to allow 6' all the way around. The city could ask for 4' on the front yard, but they are not. Moved by Commissioner Hester and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to recommend to City Council to deny Application 2004-16 for a Variance to increase the maximum fence height at 5331 Corvallis Ave N. Motion carried Page 5 of 6 Planner Sutter stated that this will go on the Council Agenda for December 21, 2004. D. OLD BUSINESS 1. Consider Application 2004-13 for Lot Division at 6401 41St Ave N to detach approximately the south 317 feet and incorporate it into the adjacent Hagemeister Pond Park. Planner Sutter summarized the staff report. Staff recommends approval. There was no discussion. Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Whitenack to recommend to City Council to approve Application 2004-13 for Lot Division at 6401 41St Ave N to detach approximately the south 317 feet and incorporate it into the adjacent Hagemeister Pond Park. Motion carried. E. NEW BUSINESS Nominate two Planning Commission members to serve on the Motor Vehicle & Equipment Code Citizen Review Committee. Moved by Chair VonRueden and seconded by Commissioner Hester to nominate Commissioners Atkinson & Strand to serve on the Motor Vehicle & Equipment Code Citizen Review Committee. Motion carried. F. GENERAL INFORMATION Planner Sutter summarized issues with the 4 car parking limit and stated that staff wanted to make the commissioners aware that we have our attorney's support in this matter and the code enforcement issues regarding this matter could come before this commission in the form of Administrative Appeals of staff's interpretation. Atkinson questioned as to whether this included the cards parked in garages. Planner Sutter stated that no, it does not. Planner Sutter stated that TCF Bank has purchased the former Tin Alley Grill and intends to demolish the structure and build a new bank. G. OPEN FORUM Commissioner Hester asked about the Chair person. Chair VonRueden stated that would be the first order of business at the January meeting. H. ADJOURNMENT Page 6 of 6 Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Krueger and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Chair VonRueden Secretary Strand M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 5, 2005 TO: Planning Commission (January 10th meeting) y .. FROM•Ehn Sutter, Planner and Redevelopment Coordinator SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Consider Application 2004-17 for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a new TCF Bank at 6830 56th Avenue North (former Tin Alley Grill site). A. BACKGROUND The subject property is a 58,500 sq. ft. (1.34 acre) site owned by Commercial Net Lease Realty, Inc. The existing building was formerly occupied by Tin Alley Grill which closed in early 2004. TCF National Bank is proposing to demolish the existing building and build a new 4,500 sq. ft. bank building plus a 2,240 sq. ft. five lane drive -up canopy. The site improvements would be updated including new parking and drive areas, additional landscaping, and three new freestanding signs. The property is zoned C-2 General Commercial. The bank office use is permitted in the C-2 district. Site plan review is required for the new building and site improvements. A conditional use permit is required because it would have a drive -up component. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Post on December 30, 2004 and mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the property. At the January 10, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission will hold the public hearing and may make a recommendation for the City Council to consider at its January 18, 2005 meeting. The following Exhibits are attached: A. Plat map showing the subject property. B. Aerial photo showing the subject property. C. Narrative submitted by applicant. D. Artistic rendering and photo of typical TCF prototype. E. Table of Project Cost (determination of surety amount required). F. Boundary and topographic survey. G. Existing condition plan. H. Site demolition plan. I. Grading plan. J. Utility plan. K. Site plan. L. Building elevations. M. Landscape plan. N. Lighting plan. O. Staff notes on the site plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW - TCF (6830 56TH) PAGE 1 OF 8 B. STAFF COMMENTS 1. Conditional Use Permit for a drive -up facility The drive -up lanes require a conditional use permit under Subsection 515.49 Subd. 4 j), with the following specific requirements: a. The facility meets the following separation distances and hours of operation requirements. For the purposes of this section, "facility" means any building or any part of the lot where the city council determines that it is likely that vehicles will be driven, stopped, or parked as part of the operations of the motor vehicle repair business. ■ No such facility shall be located less than 50 feet from any property zoned R-1, R-2 or R-3. ■ If the facility is located at least 50 but less than 100 feet from property zoned R-1, R-2 or R-3, then it may not be open before 7:00 a.m. or after 7:00 p.m. ■ If the facility is located at least 100 but less than 250 feet from property zoned R-1, R-2 or R-3, then it may not be open before 6:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m. ■ If the facility is located at least 250 feet from property zoned R-1, R-2 or R-3, then no hours of operations restriction is specified by this Code. STAFF COMMENTS: The drive -up lanes would be located approximately 450 feet from the nearest residentially zoned property (5524 Louisiana). Therefore no hours of operation restrictions are applicable in this case. b. The establishment is fully screened from any R-1, R-2 or R-3 district. STAFF COMMENTS: Not applicable. The drive -up lanes are not visible from any residentially -zoned property. C. The city council finds that there will be adequate screening and buffering between the establishment and adjacent uses. STAFF COMMENTS: None of the abutting uses need screening from the drive -up lanes. d. The city council determines that all applicable requirements of Subsection 515.05 Subd. 3 a) and Section 520 are considered and satisfactorily met. 515.05 Subd. 3 a): In addition to specific standards or criteria included in the applicable district regulations, the following criteria shall be applied in determining whether to approve a conditional use permit request: ■ The consistency of the proposed use with the comprehensive plan. STAFF COMMENTS: The comprehensive plan guides the area for Community Commercial uses including automobile -intensive uses if they secure a conditional use permit. The proposed use is consistent with objectives, plan and policies for commercial and mixed use areas (pages 43-46 of the comprehensive plan). SITE PLAN REVIEW - TCF (6830 561H) PAGE 2 OF 8 ■ The characteristics of the subject property as they relate to the proposed use. STAFF COMMENTS: The property is of sufficient size and has sufficient street frontage to accommodate the proposed use. The property can easily accommodate the proposed use including parking and landscape areas. ■ The impact of the proposed use on the surrounding area. STAFF COMMENTS: There are no foreseeable negative impacts on adjacent properties or the surrounding area. 520: Site Plan Review. STAFF COMMENTS: See items 2-8 below. 2. Building. The exterior will be mainly field brick, with some decorative stone and column accents. The main entrance would face north, towards the parking lot. A service door, utility enclosure and trash enclosure would be located on the east side of the building, facing the back of Walgreen's. All sides would have significant window area except the south side, where the only window would be the one used by the drive -up tellers. Conditions recommended by staff: ■ Fire sprinkling is required. The sprinkler system will be required to be supervised by a monitoring system. A permit is required; sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the city for review. A water flow alarm shall be located outside and inside the building to alert the occupants of the building. Depending on how the interior of the building is designed, we may require more than one horn and strobe inside the building. The fire inspectors will determine horn and strobe locations. The building shall have address numbers at least 4 inches high and in a contrasting color. The numbers shall face the addressed street. 3. Parking, traffic and sidewalks. The Zoning Ordinance requires 18 parking spaces; 48 would be provided. Access would be from one 24' wide driveway on 56th Avenue and two 24' wide driveways on Jersey Avenue. There are public sidewalks along all three street frontages. The parking lot would provide far more parking than the facility needs. The applicant has indicated that they may try to lease some of their excess parking to adjacent businesses. This would be permitted, subject to the specific provisions for off-site parking found in Subsection 515.15 Subd. 4 j) of city code. However, no such deal has been made and no specific proposal for off-site parking has been submitted to city staff for review. Because TCF needs far less parking than is currently proposed, the applicant could build a smaller parking lot and enlarge the landscaped area at the north end of the site. SITE PLAN REVIEW - TCF (6830 56TH) PAGE 3OF8 The plans show a bituminous pavement thickness of 2 inches. This may be inadequate for higher traffic areas on the site, particularly the drive -up lanes. There is a potential for conflicts between vehicles exiting the drive -up and vehicles entering the site from 56th Avenue. One way to improve the geometrics would be to shift the curb cut east. However, it cannot be shifted further east because the ordinance requires 40 feet of separation between this curb cut and the adjacent one at Walgreen's. Assuming the driveway remains configured as shown, staff feels that it should be used only by traffic leaving the site. The applicant would like to keep the two-way traffic and has proposed adding striping (a double white line and in/out arrows) to help guide the vehicles. Conditions recommended by staff: Advisory: If plans for a smaller parking lot are submitted, staff would administratively approve the revised plans if they meet all requirements of city code. (See staff note #1 in Exhibit O.) ■ The portions of the parking lot from the main east -west drive to the south shall have a bituminous pavement thickness of at least 3 inches. The portions of the parking lot north of the main east -west drive shall have a bituminous pavement thickness of at least 2 inches. (See staff note #2 in Exhibit 0.) The access on 56th Avenue shall be limited to traffic exiting the site, and shall be signed "Do Not Enter" from 56th Avenue. (See staff note #3 in Exhibit O.) ■ To provide a pedestrian connection from the building to the public sidewalk network, a sidewalk with handicap ramps shall be extended westward to the Jersey Avenue sidewalk. (See staff note #4 in Exhibit O.) 4. Signs. Three freestanding signs are proposed. The first would be a 20 foot high, 64 sq: ft. pylon sign located at the intersection of 56th and Jersey. The second would be a 9 foot high, 56 sq. ft. monument sign located at the intersection of 57th and Jersey. The third would be a 16 sq. ft. monument sign placed on the 5'/z foot high screen wall located between the drive -up and 56 Avenue. Wall signs would be located on the north, south and east sides of the building. There would also be directional and traffic signage throughout the site. The proposed signs appear to comply with the city's sign regulations (Section 405 of city code). Except for traffic and directional signs, permits are required prior to installation of signs. 5. Landscaping. The applicant would plant 15 shade trees, 7 ornamental trees, and a variety of smaller shrubs and perennials. In addition, 4 existing shade trees and 2 existing ornamental trees would be preserved. The City Forester has reviewed the plans found them to be generally acceptable with some changes or minor corrections. SITE PLAN REVIEW - TCF (6830 56TH) PAGE 4OF8 The Police Chief has expressed an interest in maximizing visibility, especially for the drive -up area. Conditions recommended by staff: ■ The screen wall shall be lowered to it is no more than 30 inches high. The monument sign located on the screen wall would be lower and may need to be made smaller to fit on a lower screen wall. (See staff note #5 in Exhibit O ■ Over time, shade and ornamental trees shall be pruned as necessary to balance desired aesthetics with the need for visibility of the drive -up area. ■ `Ivory Halo' dogwoods grow to —6 feet high; for visibility and security at the drive -up, the south 6 dogwoods must be pruned to not grow more than 30 inches high. Alternately, a dwarf variety may be substituted, or a different species may be selected with the approval of the City Forester. ■ All landscape areas except the mulch or rock planting beds shall be sodded. ■ All landscape areas shall be irrigated. ■ On staking detail, replace "rubber hose" with "nylon webbing." ■ Property owner will be responsible for unstaking trees. ■ `Skyline' honeylocust is listed as `Skycole' in the plant legend. ■ Advisory: A soil mix of equal parts sand, potting soil and peat is only necessary if the base soil is very sandy. ■ Advisory: Plans say "Paint all (pruning) cuts over 1 ", but this is not necessary except on oaks or elms in growing season. Heavy coatings of pruning paint can be harmful to they should only be applied to trees as necessary. 6. Lighting. City code limits light to 1.0 foot candle at any adjacent center line and 0.4 foot candles at any adjacent residential property line. The lighting plan shows compliance with these standards. 7. Drainage and Utilities. The proposed parking lot would slope down north to a catch basin which would connect to the storm sewer system which runs under 56th Avenue from West Broadway to Upper Twin Lake. The system currently has problems with not only surcharging (overflows occur as far west as Arby's) but also water quality issues in the lake. Because the site is less than 2 acres, on-site ponding is not required by the Shingle Creek Watershed. However, the City Engineer would like to see some rate control and sediment trapping to the extent practical despite the small size of the site. Specifically, the catch basin could be sized so that the north part of the parking lot is allowed to have shallow flooding during heavy storm events. SITE PLAN REVIEW - TCF (6830 56TH) PAGE 5OF8 The catch basin could also have a sediment trap. In the event that the parking lot is reduced in size, a dry ponding area could be created at the north end of the site, between the north edge of the downsized parking lot and the catch basin. City water is available in the form of an existing 2 inch water service from 56th Avenue. The city also has a 6 inch line serving a hydrant on the east side of the site. The applicant is proposing to install a new 8 inch supply line tapping into the main under 56th Avenue. They would also have to abandon the existing 2 inch service at the main. This would be a significant expense and major inconvenience because it would require opening up the pavement on 56th Avenue in two places. Staff is suggesting that the existing 2 inch stub could remain in use as a domestic and irrigation supply. Fire sprinkling could be supplied from the 6 inch line on the east side of the site. This scenario would eliminate the significant expense and inconvenience of opening up the pavement on 56th Avenue. There are two sanitary sewer connections to the main under 56th Avenue. The west service stub currently serves the existing building and would also serve the new building. The east service stub is currently not in use and would remain unused. Electric and communications lines serving the new building shall be underground, in accordance with city code. The city is planning to have the overhead lines along 56th Avenue put underground in 2005. To accomplish this, an easement will be required across the south 10 feet of the site. The applicant has said they are willing to provide the necessary easement; they have also designed their site improvements to minimize potential conflicts with the undergrounding project. Conditions recommended by staff: ■ The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to create shallow rate control ponding in the north part of the parking lot, as well as design the catch basin so it has a sediment trap. As an alternative to these two measures, a dry pond could be created at the north end of the site if the parking lot is reduced in size. If the existing 2 inch water service is not going to be used, then the applicant shall abandon it at the main. ■ Advisory: Instead of tapping a new 8 inch water service into the main under 56th Avenue and abandoning the existing 2 inch water service, the 2 inch service could fulfill domestic and irrigation needs. Fire sprinkling could be supplied from the 6 inch line along the east side of the site. ■ All utilities serving the new building, including electrical and communications, shall be located underground. SITE PLAN REVIEW - TCF (6830 56T") PAGE 6 OF 8 • The property owner shall dedicate to the city a drainage and utility easement across the south 10 feet of the site. 8. Surety required. City code requires financial surety for completion of the required site improvements. Typically, the amount of surety is determined based on all of the estimated landscaping cost plus a portion of estimated paving and utilities costs. Staff is recommending that the required surety be $34,500, with $24,000 to be released upon satisfactory completion of the site improvements and $10,500 to be released after at least one full year has passed since installation of the landscaping. As required by city code, the surety must be in the form of a cash escrow deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit in a form acceptable to the city. Conditions recommended by staff: No building permit shall be issued until the required $34,500 surety and an executed site improvement agreement are provided to the city. C. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the submitted plans and requested conditional use permit for construction of a new TCF Bank at 6830 56th Avenue North, subject to the following conditions: 1. Fire sprinkling is required by a monitoring system. to the city for review. . The sprinkler system will be required to be supervised A permit is required; sprinkler plans shall be submitted 2. A water flow alarm shall be located outside and inside the building to alert the occupants of the building. Depending on how the interior of the building is designed, we may require more than one horn and strobe inside the building. The fire inspectors will determine horn and strobe locations. 3. The building shall have address numbers at least 4 inches high and in a contrasting color. The numbers shall face the addressed street. 4. The portions of the parking lot from the main east -west drive to the south shall have a bituminous pavement thickness of at least 3 inches. The portions of the parking lot north of the main east -west drive shall have a bituminous pavement thickness of at least 2 inches. 5. The access on 56th Avenue shall be limited to traffic exiting the site, and shall be signed "Do Not Enter" from 56th Avenue. 6. To provide a pedestrian connection from the building to the public sidewalk network, a sidewalk with handicap ramps shall be extended westward to the Jersey Avenue sidewalk. SITE PLAN REVIEW - TCF (6830 56T") PAGE 7 OF 8 7. The screen wall shall be lowered to it is no more than 30 inches high. The monument sign located on the screen wall would be lower and may need to be --� made smaller to fit on a lower screen wall. 8. Over time, shade and ornamental trees shall be pruned as necessary to balance desired aesthetics with the need for visibility of the drive -up area. 9. `Ivory Halo' dogwoods grow to —6 feet high; for visibility and security at the drive - up, the south 6 dogwoods must be pruned to not grow more than 30 inches high. Alternately, a dwarf variety may be substituted, or a different species may be selected with the approval of the City Forester. 10. All landscape areas except the mulch or rock planting beds shall be sodded. 11. All landscape areas shall be irrigated. 12. On staking detail, replace "rubber hose" with "nylon webbing." 13. Property owner will be responsible for unstaking trees. 14. 'Skyline' honeylocust is listed as `Skycole' in the plant legend. 15. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to create shallow rate control ponding in the north part of the parking lot, as well as design the catch basin so it has a sediment trap. As an alternative to these two measures, a dry pond could be created at the north end of the site if the parking lot is reduced in size. 16. If the existing 2 inch water service is not going to be used, then the applicant shall abandon it at the main. 17. All utilities serving the new building, including electrical and communications, shall be located underground. 18. The property owner shall dedicate to the city a drainage and utility easement across the south 10 feet of the site. 19. No building permit shall be issued until the required $34,500 surety and an executed site improvement agreement are provided to the city. The suggested findings of fact are that the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and city code, provided the recommended conditions are met. Planning Commission action is requested. The City Council would consider the Planning Commission's recommendation at its next meeting on January 18, 2005. SITE PLAN REVIEW - TCF (6830 56T") PAGE 8 OF 8 I m 6b 00 .� y ^ DvW 'r to 33 - KE-NTU� --AVW 46� 199.8 m. \ ch v Z ip 71. 1 /• 9.411.13 74, W w V W - D zz ° CITY OF CRYSTAL ;3 r AVE. 34 /.94 /� o .•si. r�fi�� 82.06 �I tiO IUISIANA / 01 •°) li O ifo* :' �. N JI CITY iS8 OF z 71 X V) > 706s.5° 1• 372,07 13 L N 4 U V 4 w:•� w N - O JERSEY AVE. o N H is tip` � 3°I.71 t, s w N G) 11.01 Cl Y OF NEW 772 CITY OF CRYSTAL _°�, _ I m 6b 00 .� y ^ 33 3S DvW 140-3 N 33 - KE-NTU� --AVW 46� 199.8 m. \ 42 v Z -1 ° CITY OF CRYSTAL ;3 MARYLAND AVE. 34 /.94 /� o .•si. r�fi�� 82.06 4) ,E T. —'_ m N JI CITY iS8 OF z 710 X V) > 706s.5° 1• 372,07 13 L •q w N - O JERSEY AVE. o N _ s w N G) p�. _°�, _ 4o TION D r PT o Of r F �s75 1.31, A. 325 --'v G2 O O vti� �D moZ ` t o rn D 70 70 0 ;' 2Z 64 12: K 6o 275 3 IM J,� z3 at 4 H oCMQ�ST ucc _ _Zu- NEW HOPE $: PALMER ADD. a �• srila'w JZ ' o/s7- / a a \\� - CITY 304.3 CIT o �uT OTA 8 ' — r 42 r20om �i O J' � � L 4 4.8 W r H ^ ' 94. Q') A 33 3S DvW 140-3 N 33 - KE-NTU� --AVW 46� 199.8 m. \ 42 v Z -1 FISH�M ;3 tz 34 /.94 /� 82.06 4) T. —'_ m N JI w v A X V) > -4 - 372,07 297.03 N0�19 �Er r D JERSEY AVE. o N _ Ilk 71V 56 42 AVE.— 727 721.7 140-3 tomb. Z Z u FISH�M � tz �®� � �. ADDITION w ° • 372,07 JERSEY AVE. o G) _°�, _ 4o D r 4° G2 O O vti� �D moZ ` t o rn 6ti W D C K 6o w 3 IM J,� at 4 4 ucc _ _Zu- Cyo 33,3 a r �r� ODA D r — � ? v, \\� 0 ^' < r 42 r20om �i O J' 33 D H ^ ' wIA 229.67 4, q� W bm\ �a ti� w� 5 G "sLa 170 , ".ic C) v m u �� C wb J rmj .Q n h r.p r 01 0 Q� 6 Ilk 71V 56 42 AVE.— 03 k Z „-_ December 17, 2004 City of Crystal ARCHITECTS Mr. John Sutter 4141 Douglas Drive N Crystal, MN 55422 Re: TCF National Bank Proposed Branch Bank 6830 Bass Lake Road Crystal, Minnesota Dear John, TCF National Bank is planning a new branch facility for the site of the current Tin Alley Grille restaurant at the corner of Bass Lake Road and Jersey Avenue. At this time we are requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the drive -up teller function. The property will continue to be owned by Commercial Net Realty, Inc., with a long-term land lease to TCF National Bank. Following is a brief description of the project for you use in review of our request. The building will be 4,500 square feet, with a five -lane drive -up teller area, including one lane for ATM access. The building functions will include branch manager office, conference room, up to ten customer service work stations, a teller line, restrooms, break room and mechanical/electrical service space. Site Highlights The site is larger than a typical TCF branch bank site. We will be pursuing opportunities to create parking at the north end of the site for adjacent businesses with parking needs. There is an existing roadway easement bisecting the property east to west, allowing access to/from the Walgreen's property. We have developed a modified easement in conjunction with Walgreen's, which will be put in place as part of this project. The function of the easement will remain the same as today. Building/Site Image The building is designed to match the TCF National Bank prototype. This prototype utilizes the highest quality materials, including modular brick, textured brick and polished pre -cast concrete. The quality projected by this design has recently received great response in our newest locations in Blaine, Coon Rapids and Bloomington. Signage We are planning three site signs and three building mounted signs. There will be a two sided site pylon on Jersey Avenue, at the intersection with Bass Lake Road (80 s.f. per face), a monument sign on 57`6 Avenue facing Jersey Avenue (65 s.f. per face), and a sign at Bass Lake Road on the landscape wall (30 s.f.). The building mounted signs will be approximately 35 square feet each. One is over the entry, one is on the dormer facing Walgreen's, and one is at the end of the drive up canopy. TCF is excited about becoming an integral part of the community. We look forward to your approval, and to beginning construction in 2005. Please feel free to call with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, C O Michael F. Kraft HTG Architects CC: Larry Rose, TCF National Bank HTG ARCHITECTS 9300 Hennepin Town Road Mpis MN 55347 (952) 278-8880 www.htg-architects.cc EXHIBIT �.�r 1�� u:iojKo I a Q Community Development Department City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal MN 55422 voice: 763-531-1000 facsimile: 763-531-1188 internet: www-ci.crystal.mn us TABLE OF PROJECT COST for Planning & Zoning Applications (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) Address of Subject Property: �P '� 3o SCo �` Avg N, Description or Name of Project: TGA Nd'f 10NAL- tt*Nk $ 5°�, 000 $ $4r-,4.00 $ $ $ epc)' 000 Engineering, Architectural and Legal Expenses Site Preparation (grading, filling, tree removal) Utilities (water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer) Streets, Sidewalks, Parking (and other paved areas) Other Site Improvements (lighting) Construction of Buildings (materials and labor) $ II. 1 t -z -.c TOTAL PROJECT COST (not including landscaping) If the total project cost is... Then the minimum landscaping value is... Below $1,000,000 From $1,000,001 to $2,000,000 From $2,000,001 to $3,000,000 From $3,000,001 to $4,000,000 Over $4,000,000 2% of the total project cost $20, 000 + 1 % of total project cost in excess of $1,000,000 $30,000 + 0.75% of total project cost in excess of $2,000,000 $37,500 + 0.25% of total project cost in excess of $3,000,000 1 % of total project cost (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) APPLICATION #: SURETY REQUIRED: 11 $ 2—)¢ 2-2-0 Landscaping (must meet the minimum value above) I $ 2 ), 000 ------------------ $ 3t 5-06 TOT) EXHIBIT SURETY REQUIRE E 56TH AVENUE NORTH FIMwB69.8J INV.:866.8 O IJ Q INV.68 . 998 INV. - .6 LEGEND • ;J OENCH1dAP.K )P lK HAIL 0 EV.w 871?0 Concrete Curb Nr LUL Underground Telephone -w -•-w- xy /9 -- --_- m`o'p .-S. UNE OF LOT 2, 13LOCK 1, GUT MILLS CRYSTAL AOD. Overhead Electric ---„<- _ L J Storm Sew, ---- 9�. f - -rse- Parking Setback Une 7 Underground Electric O Electric Meter Q Electric Box 0 Electric Manhole W Unknown Manhole z Hydrant W Pole 0 INV.68 . 998 INV. - .6 LEGEND • Property Monument 0 Concrete Concrete Curb ---- Underground Telephone -w -•-w- water -- --_- Gas Fence - --w- Overhead Electric ---„<- Sanitary Se- ewer----„.- - - - - - - Storm Sew, ---- Setback Line - -rse- Parking Setback Une -- Underground Electric O Electric Meter 97 Electric Box 0 Electric Manhole ® Unknown Manhole Hydrant 0Power Pole U Guy Wire Anchor 0 Gale Volve O Guard Post ® Cato basin ® Catchbasin ® AirConditioning Unit 16' Deciduous Tree (Diameter in Inches) $j Coniferous Tree (Diameter in Inches) # Light Pole O Gas Meter IF Telephone 80. m Telephone Man ole ® Water Manhole .r) Guy Pole ® Sanitary Manhole B Storm Manhole -�_--906--_-- Existing Contour X 851.27G ExisMg Spot Elevation Gutter X 934.3 Existing Spot Elevation +- Proposed Drainage Arrow 30 15 O 30 60 90 SCALE IN FEET VIUNI I Y MAP a 9g � a7 m Rp 56th Av. NOT TO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1. Block 1, GROUND ROUND ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesota. NOTES CORRESPONDING TO EASEMENTS: Drainage and unity voeement as shown - the recorded plat al Ground Round Addili Rooawoy easement 20 feel wider appurlenenl to Lot 1, Stock i, General Mals Crysld Addition, Document No. 3838964. EASEMENT INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY PERFORMED BY WALTER J. GREGORY OF MERILA & ASSOCIATES DATED MARCH 4. 1997. REVISED APRIL 2. 1997. NO DOCUMENT PROVIDED. STATEMENT OF ENCROACHMENTS: Q Public sidewalk encroaches 0.46 feel and 0.66 feel on the north side and .oath side respecuvNy onto the properly as shown on survey. 4 0. S'i'dinanches 8.60 1111 old 9.32 feet - The .est Intl south side 1-9-1i„ely unto seg coa tback It.. as shown - the aurvay GENERAL NOTES: I. The be.rinq system used ie bused - The plot of Ground Round Addition 2. The location of the untlerground 'ladies shown hereon, if any, .1.all PURSUANT TO MSA 2160 CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT C61 2) 454-0002 PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 3. Subject property a identified as being ih 'Zone C, Are. of Ninlmol Flooding' - Flood I.,...... Rote Map. Gommunity-PmN No. 270156 0002 B. effective dole June 1; 1978. 4. Zoning a Presently C-2 (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) per City of C1y41,01. 5. Setback rsx,.s vets per Cny of Crystal. Contact Planning Dept., (763) 531-1142 Front 30 Rear - 5 Side 5 Side or Reer Adjoining street - 30 6. Site ore. - 58610 III -M feet - 1.345 acres. 7. There or .pera total of 102 striped parking atoda on ..id prty. of which (here are 2 deeignaledoe hondicop and 0 Iocoted In gw.gete). 8. This survey ... made en the ground. 9. N. --t title work w s famished for the p 111llcn of this survey. legal descdplica, carded ro corded easements and encumbrancer are subject to rewsw upon receipt o! current title work. 10. Eleva lion datum ie based on City data. Bench mark Is Iocoted os HSJ BENCHMARK (AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) Elevation - 871.90 11 Property u- m ants at the n,[heasl and the southwest c s t -d me foot (i fl.) sou lh al thenaI.t..' bovit.- and the properly it Ml al sThe the southeast o i I— two feet n.rlh of the actual lot cane («Wal lot comer appear to fall in toms.!. sidewalk) NOI.: Same infarmallon w s provided by .vey perfannetl by Walter J. Gregory of Mara, & Associates doled March 4. 1997 revised April 2. 1997 SCALE: i /NCH = 30 FEET 1 REVISIONS II Date: I hereby certify that this survey,plan a, report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota Thomas E Hodorff, L.S. Minnesota Reg. No. 23677 Date: Cgy.mygr 5�2Dga ___ BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY For: STS CONSULTANTS LTD SITE: TCF BASS LAKE RD I 6830 59TH AVENUE NORTH CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY HARRY S. JOHNSON CO., INC. LAND SURVEYORS 9063 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN. 55437 Tole.952-6845341 Fax 952-884-5344 werWlJk�twrveyars.aom File No. - s`588 � 1-3-6833 I 11 -Jw.o. eameer a�r.ma. IgnnAe77 i DINT EXHIBIT F U GENERAL MILLS CR` S AL ADDITION i S. LINE 01 LOT 2, BLOCK 1, GENERAL 0 21 RIM=01U.04 INV.=859.5 Z INV— I8159.8 EXISTING CONTOURS h SET BACK LINE J -874• -z N 0"01 00' E 74 /_� /r -- S 0'01'00" W 200.00 \ .[ r---------------- --------------- 24.5 I s"A - - - - - - � -- - M02! C 8 ? PING S FT7 1 1pN-G20 S-TA LS ; I` RIM=869.83 ccu I 873 �is 1-11 RIM=869.86 INV.=866.8 N�- .� O 10 20 30 40 SCALE IN FEET IN =566.5 i j I I C.B. EXIST. } 10 w \ RIM=870.90 �� STORM �M.H 00 y��NV.=867.4-,— _- nr / w EXISTIN_ I //ron 872. 3 RIM=870.33 I a I r 868. i INV.=866.2 T ' I i i �- 16 PAR ING STA / z \j/ 1 7� LUI a I 16 PA4 ING STA N U cr 9.4 co -I- 0£- �a C.B. EXIST. RIM =871.31 \ 9 0. I o INV.=867.7 n �' I �S 3t Ito 2 IM=87-- -- - - SH4sfA LS -- - - ----- /g �o z LJ L INV.=866.5 T) C.S.— / RIM=871.36 , / INS.=§68.e JERSEY `87z� INV.=868.2 24.5 ::40 `•--NW, COR. OF SO. 200 FT. OF LOT 1 VUIrnmi AKty - —STORY BUILDING AVENUE 00 N 'd - FAM m INV.=870.1 LLJ 1D z W Q Q0 LO STS CONSULTANTS 10900 7314 Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 Copyrig0l 2004 By: STS Consultants, Ltd - I Y F— U 0 o Q w Y E Q 1n Z U Z CO m Q O LL 06 H LLI H Z 07 ¢ >- X w U LL W W 3 Issued Rey Date 0escnoton Designed JS 12/17/2004 Dnhvn: TAX 12/17/2004 Checked: JB 12/17/2001 699743 SHEEP REFERENCE NUMBER C-1 SHEET 1 OF 4 EXHIBLT G INV— I8159.8 I ' \ A j I I s"A M02! I i I I M .30 A 1 Co 0 ch 00 �N .. z 1 Q W 9I O 00 N 'd - FAM m INV.=870.1 LLJ 1D z W Q Q0 LO STS CONSULTANTS 10900 7314 Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 Copyrig0l 2004 By: STS Consultants, Ltd - I Y F— U 0 o Q w Y E Q 1n Z U Z CO m Q O LL 06 H LLI H Z 07 ¢ >- X w U LL W W 3 Issued Rey Date 0escnoton Designed JS 12/17/2004 Dnhvn: TAX 12/17/2004 Checked: JB 12/17/2001 699743 SHEEP REFERENCE NUMBER C-1 SHEET 1 OF 4 EXHIBLT G 0 1 LL Q "' L Ll X w a Q F O J IL I- Q I Z rn I L0 CD O N U I m 3 v 0 0) rn rn coO co '7 0) a) IT SP w 0 10 20 30 40 O a SCALE IN FEET X JLKS�-Y 0 _ C I IAIC /1C I nT 7 OI 11 t,v t I- L It VI YI I VIY1111wV 1\LIYIvvm --NW. COR. OF S0. 200 FT. OF LOT 1 AV E N U E LEGEND lb REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE (ELECTRICAL) ■ REMOVE EXISTING TREE (CLEAR & GRUB VEGETATION) ® REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE (SIDEWALKS) ® REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE (CURB & GUTTER) - - SAWCUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS (PAVEMENT) NOTES 1. CAP ALL EXISTING UTILTIES AT BUILDING. 2. PROTECT ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING NOT DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL S31WA M'0'N EXTENT OF BITUMINOUS REMOVAL all ry O z Ek'vl STS Consultants wwwstsmnsultants.mm 10900 73rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 Copyright 2004 Q By: STS Cpn .Unts, DO. 763-315-6300 0 Q O Z (If Q cn Qw F— I- -ja. Y U U Z UO) F O Z w Z T— < Q o Z U m m � Q W w 'F'^^' 2 0 > Vl r } I..L O U) w U LL co 0-1w Issued Rev Date Description 1 1-05-2005 REV. PER CITY, ARCH. COMMENTS Designed: JB 12/17/2004 Drawn: TAR 12/17/2004 Checked: JB 12/17/2004 Approved: BM 12/17/2004 PROJECT NUMBER 699743 SHEET REFERENCE N UMBER Cn EXHIBIT SHEET H N� -BIZ 0 10 20 30 40 SCALE IN FEET GENERAL GRADING & DRAINA . NO I.) ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/CURER FLOWUNE GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.) REFER TO THE SITE PVN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3.) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEAMRFS WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD—VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATION FROM PLAN. 4.) ALL RC PIPE FOR SrQRM SEWER SHALL BE CLASS 5 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. 6.) POSITIVE DRAMod;E FROM ME SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. 7.) THE GRADING CONTRACTOR MUST BE AWARE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.) DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 9.) CATCH BASIN PROTECTION AROUND ALL PROPOSED CBS PER THE ATTACHED DERAIL. EROSION CONTROL N01FS I.) ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN—PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/GCNSTRUCTION MD SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER WAS MEN ESTABUSHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON—SITE SHALL RE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SMALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. R IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CON -1 TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED RY THE CITY SHALL RE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. 2.) ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO OETNLS TO REDUCE TRACKWG OF GIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. 3.) ALL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE ADEDUATE SEMMENT TRAPPING SYSTEMS INSTALLED AROUND THEM. 4.) TEMPORARY SEEDING (MIDOT 2000 508). FERRLIZING, AND TYPE I MULCHING (M,tDOT 2000 3881) MUST BE APPLIED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ROUGHGRADING ON 3:1 SLOPES OR STEEPER. 14 DAYS ON 10:1 TO 3:1 SLOPES. OR 21 DAYS ON SLOPES FLATTER THAN 10:1 UNLESS PRECLUDED BY SNOW COVER. 5.) THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL—DM14M CONOITION AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING AND/OR OTHSR MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURING OCN5TRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PALLS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW. SIIL NUItS 1.) THE PRIME CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, PUBLIC MID PRIVATE, ON THE SITE THE CONTRACTOR 15 ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS ASSOCWTED WITH REPAIRING ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2.) PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR HAUUHG SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SOIL ANO DEBRIS STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE CONCURRENT WITH EARTHWORK ON SITE. 3.) HAULING HOURS MUST BE CONFIRMED WIRD THE CITY PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 4.) ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. 5.) SURVEY PROVIDED BY HARRY JOHNSON CO. 6.) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL. POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSiEIA (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 7.) REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS. 8.) ALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. 9.) ALL PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS. S31HVA M'O H LEGEND INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LOCATION - -EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS W PROPOSED CATCH BASIN LOCATION ® EXISTING STORM MANHOLE(S) 2OODESIGN SPOT ELEVATIONS LLJ Q Q0 Ln STS CONSULTAN78 W AN"urWR8111121ft- 1000073rd Ave— North Maple Grove, MN 55369 Copyright 2004 El, STS Consultants, Ltd 0 Q 0 Lu Y 0 U Q J WLU F- Q Q- Z CO m Q LL q W ¢ � CL > � 3: WU LL U) Of W Rev Dote OescnpRion U6619rIEQ. JB 11/11/1DU4 DrewT: TAK 12/17/2004 Checked: JB 12/17/2004 ApprOVed: BM 12/17/2DO4 PROJECT NUMBER 699743 SHEET REFERENCE NUMBER C-3 i SHEET 3 OF XX EXHIBIT I INV. -866.8 0 10 20 30 40 T SCALE IN FEET GENERAL U771ITY 1.) THE CONTRACTOR WALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS NO c B.) ALL. CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.10 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY FEET. RIM RZVATIONS ON THE S.E $ UTUTY BW'ROVEMENTS DIFFERENCES. PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 2.) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERINS. CONSTRUCTION TECHMOUES ANTESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1988 9.) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. EDITION OF THE 'STANDARD UTIUTIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN ILIO SERVICE LINE INSTALIATION AMC SMIRARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY 10.) ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO BE POLYVINYL CHLOPoDE COMPOSITE SEWER PIPE SDR 28 OR EQUAL AS APPROVE(PVC7D BY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA' AND THE 'STANDARD ENGINEER. SPECFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION' MnOOT JUNE 9, 1988 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUMS THE CONTRACTOR 11.) ALL WATER MAIN PPE TO BE CLAM52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHILL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS (DIP) OR EQUAL AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. 12.) ALL WATER MAIN WILL BE PRESSURE TESTED AS DIRECTED BY 3.) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY PERMITS FORqnm!g!�D � ROANCE ITH CAL CALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS. SANTT AND WATER SERVICES THAT U4.) VERIFY EX6TNG INVERT LOCATIONS t ELEVATIONS PRIOR TOED () BUILDING CAP SAO SERVO ES 5() BUILDING FOOTING LOCATION. BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5.) THE WATER MAIN SHILL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. OF 7.5 FT, OF COVER ADJUST OF OFFSET WATERMAN TO MAINTAIN AN 18 INCH MIN. CLEARANCE AT LOCATION CROSSING SANITARY MRD/OR STORM SEWER THE CONTRACTOR SHILL VERIFY THE CITY AS -BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK LOCATION AND ANTERIAL TYPE Q B.) ALL STORM SEWER PPE SHALL BE RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE Of NOTED. 7.) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER SLATE ONE CALL - FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UnUTY INSTALLATION. m GEN INLET PROTECTION - �— PROPOSED WATER - - -PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER (DIP PROPOSED CATCH BASIN LOCATION 0 EXISTING STORM MANHOLE(S) GOPHEJ TATE ONE CALL 651-454-0002 Metro 1-800-252-1166 Greater MN NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND EXTEND TO 5 FEET FROM PROPOSED BUILDING WITH 6" PVC 01.00X. STS Consultants www.stsconsunards. oom 1090073rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 Copyright 2004 By: STS Ca Wtonts, Ltd. Rev Date Description 1 1/05/2005 REV. PER CITY, ARCH. COMMENTS Designed: JB 12/17/2004 Drawn: TAK 12/17/2004 Checked: JR 12/17/2004 Approved: BM 12/17/2004 PROJECT NUMBER 699743 SHEET REFERENCE NUMBER C" EXHIBIT SHEE J D Q 0 Of < U) U Y O 0 Z < H Q Q Z Of ~ m Q LL F- W _ Q w U LL U) Of W Rev Date Description 1 1/05/2005 REV. PER CITY, ARCH. COMMENTS Designed: JB 12/17/2004 Drawn: TAK 12/17/2004 Checked: JR 12/17/2004 Approved: BM 12/17/2004 PROJECT NUMBER 699743 SHEET REFERENCE NUMBER C" EXHIBIT SHEE J ADOITIONAL 51CA FACES BOLLARD- REXOLE ---- — y—� --v Kn- QEF SDI 516 E1.RfA11DY 6W POST- COLOR / FOOTIN6S- SEE X. W V1' LV CONCRETE SIDENA-L RNTTE N1TE VINYL YELLOW TYP. • NB C.yFYN1OPY LOLU•EC, n I i�//l6 TRASH ENCLSR. DTL. O www SI 6RFY C.GG. ISLAND ,o ISLAND DETAIL ENTIRE RA�V „ K105K DETAIL - L 4' REM COIL ON 4 RE OOW, TYPKA'1- AI 12 AI 3/4'=I' -O' B •:�' REFL. O © O ® VINYL. O MTE BANK FACE OR" DRIVE-i]P E4'YRY1.T TFiy'rt COCAP - COW. LAP 6L0 OELN4TE-FT6.1 FON-FTG. FCO'TO BT SIGNAGE SEE STRMT. — — J — _ — — _ — SEE 5TRIJLT. — — -1 EO O (.OITTRACTOR- REfHt TO STRUCT. O O HX#'ENT SIGN MON 11611 TRAFFIC 51ON5 51ON ELEVATIONS 5' DIA NCM. BALL - 1: NOTE SEE ELECT. PLAN FOR FLAGPOLE L&M45 REOVIREPENT IROAPE L16MS ON PIDTOCELL TO L&IT FL.A6 AFTER Hail!5 '. ON P CGf STYLE ALIRL POLE JTYP. BOLLARD- REXOLE ---- — y—� --v Kn- QEF SDI 516 -:•.. 6W POST- COLOR / FOOTIN6S- SEE X. W V1' LV CONCRETE SIDENA-L M5N 1H TO OaAR D _ CALLKINS YELLOW TYP. • NB C.yFYN1OPY LOLU•EC, n I i�//l6 TRASH ENCLSR. DTL. O NO PAWJW 51511. 5E£ 1E/N MtlTE C.GG. ISLAND ,o ISLAND DETAIL ENTIRE RA�V „ K105K DETAIL BOLLARD DETAIL 5TRWILRAL 4' REM COIL ON 4 RE OOW, TYPKA'1- AI 12 AI 3/4'=I' -O' B PAMTf9 4x STRIPES TYP. NO R 16ATICN YlEVi3 SEE CML © 17 MG1 ADDRESS N111ffR5 ® OWi CTICNN SNOB 5EE INN W-DGES r — — — — — — EXTERIOR FALEERICK P 11110 SIDES • )_ E ALL DOOR5TO '� 14ATOH EXSTOO 3' RAD. ��x I I MTU RXVFW, I W B• GN SACKER P LIO TMX SLOPE '� DRY SND PROFIL U 1 n SLOPED TO DRAOONC. SLAB SLOPED n �= I 11 Cow. - ` � i s FACE BRICK'A' ACCENT BRICK 8' W 13. Cr OL. BIN ALM. TUBE c 4 RON FFPGE W 1'X7 PICKETS. PIASTIG ,T( _ I a a4 4' OL. M FA ROW RtOVIOE I'x3' RAIL .TOP 1 BOTTOM t� it i -t W W. SLATS 5UTS ON 1X9 LI5NTMN5 PROTECTION BTOIER CON ON &RAVEL STEEL LATG y AID LOOK HGP RAMP DETAIL n FLAG POLE DETAIL Q CURB DETAIL AI CONTROL .OM FRONT ELEVATION FOOTWSS-SE E STFXTwAL BLDINS FACE ------ -- RECYYC�---- rIT£ ESO0.4T00. TRA5H ENCLOSURE �l AI 1/4' -I -O 5' DIA NCM. BALL - 1: NOTE SEE ELECT. PLAN FOR FLAGPOLE L&M45 REOVIREPENT IROAPE L16MS ON PIDTOCELL TO L&IT FL.A6 AFTER Hail!5 '. ON P CGf STYLE ALIRL POLE JTYP. SLOPE FIDS OF II ISLANDS 31 N FLAT TOP WRFALE PROTFLTWF COVER W BAW, EaW. $LFPLN M We 3 4' 0D. 4'-0R. STEEL PIPE ' CO.4GFILL- TYP. Bf GL. KID`X 1 BOL PROTECTIVE LOVER BY 4'1 STEEL PIPE SEE NAICOL. BANK =JIPPLIER W COW- FILL W EO11P. '1UPPPP LIER y ORWE4P KIOSK En' 66L/.. TO PROVIDE ELEL. Q 0 0 O O 3 STIR 0"5. COL" O BOLLARD- REXOLE �Nil BITLWNOV$ PAVNS 516 OO 6W POST- COLOR O4 DO NOT IWER 51611- SEE INN X. W V1' LV CONCRETE SIDENA-L M5N 1H TO OaAR D _ CALLKINS YELLOW TYP. • NB C.yFYN1OPY LOLU•EC, n I i�//l6 TRASH ENCLSR. DTL. O NO PAWJW 51511. 5E£ 1E/N ID C.GG. ISLAND ,o ISLAND DETAIL ENTIRE RA�V „ K105K DETAIL BOLLARD DETAIL GRADE 4' REM COIL ON 4 RE OOW, TYPKA'1- AI 12 AI 3/4'=I' -O' B PAMTf9 4x STRIPES TYP. NO R 16ATICN YlEVi3 SEE CML © 17 MG1 ADDRESS N111ffR5 ® OWi CTICNN SNOB 5EE INN W-DGES wM uqze wa D� TYPICAL- ' P 11110 SIDES • )_ -r '� 14ATOH EXSTOO 3' RAD. ��x LIO TMX SLOPE '� DRY SND PROFIL U NASOWr HALL �= I 11 Cow. - ` � i s r ALM. TUBE c 4 RON FFPGE W 1'X7 PICKETS. 1 _ a a4 4' OL. M FA ROW RtOVIOE I'x3' RAIL .TOP 1 BOTTOM t� it i -t LI5NTMN5 PROTECTION CON ON &RAVEL HVAC EOUP'T. SCREEN n HGP RAMP DETAIL n FLAG POLE DETAIL Q CURB DETAIL AI I'=1'-0' AI 1/4'=1'-0- AI not to scale Ai 1 I/2'=I'-0- SLOPE FIDS OF II ISLANDS 31 N FLAT TOP WRFALE PROTFLTWF COVER W BAW, EaW. $LFPLN M We 3 4' 0D. 4'-0R. STEEL PIPE ' CO.4GFILL- TYP. Bf GL. KID`X 1 BOL PROTECTIVE LOVER BY 4'1 STEEL PIPE SEE NAICOL. BANK =JIPPLIER W COW- FILL W EO11P. '1UPPPP LIER y ORWE4P KIOSK En' 66L/.. TO PROVIDE ELEL. Q 0 0 O O 3 STIR 0"5. COL" O 65'-4'l vIEN cis 1 I o TRW161.E METal�IEZAITW � I LiT PER PLA I F pJ j tl SPACES. 9'-0'x10'-0' EA. 4 I �T+jllll II Ip o r3i EXTS r cu TREES T� eE REMP/E4 Iq 16 m 4 r H 464 14'-O' 'fi' 11'-0' '-y 14•-0' 9' IS SPACES B t NW. C Ry, FS 34 & ,{a/ 20 F . OF LOT 1 (n S it It I c/ LL #' TMP 47 1t 51 TE PLAN BA55 LAKE ROAD GENERAL NOTE5 I. ALL DLENEDNS ARE TO FACE aF aX✓B, VNO. 1. REFER TO CML ORAJ*rl, FOR ALL OT1Ht SITE INFO AND TO A MTECNtAL FLOOR RAN FOR BALOIIS 011436 6 3. PRDRJF.ED SIfM TO UNI LY MTN CITY OF CRYSTAL GRADING INFORMATION I. SEE CIVILFOR Ew5nN5 6RAOE5, IEH 69AOES, VTLiI'I RLGdLAi10N 1 OVER DETAILS KEY NOTE5 O BOLLARD- REXOLE O BITLWNOV$ PAVNS 516 OO 6W POST- COLOR O4 DO NOT IWER 51611- SEE INN O CONCRETE SIDENA-L YELLOW TYP. • NB C.yFYN1OPY LOLU•EC, N REINFORCEO COW, ANO GV4D REINFORCEDED 4000 PSI O NO PAWJW 51511. 5E£ 1E/N ID C.GG. ISLAND ,o ISLAND DETAIL NANDX•AP PA - SEE l/AI „ K105K DETAIL BOLLARD DETAIL AI I/8'=1'-0 B 5FF VN AI' 3/4'=1'-0' 12 AI 3/4'=I' -O' 65'-4'l vIEN cis 1 I o TRW161.E METal�IEZAITW � I LiT PER PLA I F pJ j tl SPACES. 9'-0'x10'-0' EA. 4 I �T+jllll II Ip o r3i EXTS r cu TREES T� eE REMP/E4 Iq 16 m 4 r H 464 14'-O' 'fi' 11'-0' '-y 14•-0' 9' IS SPACES B t NW. C Ry, FS 34 & ,{a/ 20 F . OF LOT 1 (n S it It I c/ LL #' TMP 47 1t 51 TE PLAN BA55 LAKE ROAD GENERAL NOTE5 I. ALL DLENEDNS ARE TO FACE aF aX✓B, VNO. 1. REFER TO CML ORAJ*rl, FOR ALL OT1Ht SITE INFO AND TO A MTECNtAL FLOOR RAN FOR BALOIIS 011436 6 3. PRDRJF.ED SIfM TO UNI LY MTN CITY OF CRYSTAL GRADING INFORMATION I. SEE CIVILFOR Ew5nN5 6RAOE5, IEH 69AOES, VTLiI'I RLGdLAi10N 1 OVER DETAILS KEY NOTE5 O STOP 516A 5EE XAN O PTLDN SION SEE WN 516 OO 10/�T�/N �8AR"O O4 DO NOT IWER 51611- SEE INN O CONCRETE SIDENA-L TIM CNtlPY 1 Cum FAA.7 OORNE SEE D/AI, IVN 1 WAI O NO PAWJW 51511. 5E£ 1E/N ID FLAG POLE- SEE B/N Oq NANDX•AP PA - SEE l/AI ® CONDENSER EN LO -%W- SEE MN B 5FF VN I] FIR LAZE 54:41- SEE ]F/N B PAMTf9 4x STRIPES TYP. NO R 16ATICN YlEVi3 SEE CML © 17 MG1 ADDRESS N111ffR5 ® OWi CTICNN SNOB 5EE INN O IDN48n 5.% SEE MAI /NEH YK-LGREEW5 G1RB W. EXISTING MAL6REm OLRB W. 2 Z U J � d J ul zW � o w O rn o W z LU Q W Q Q Y L -u Q Z � m o z p Z Z I= CD m Y cn Ucn rr, M m U Al aw EXHIBIT K GAP FLASNMv 1 GaNTIMM RID6E VIEW ASPHALT SHINSLES SIYF�6D�AROUa 24' BPLKUT SINW6E- — ELEC. caurR, ro PROVIDE nME�u.Oc�K A o�G�7I�ROLs PREFlN. WATE MIL FASCIA TRIM PROFILE- TYP. PREFIN. M. RUED MWIL- rrP. EM. SOFFIT LICdNIN6 FIELD BRICK - COLORADO R05E . F_XT. GPU.K JONTS TO BE — WNrtE lYNFDSCCLORIN6• TYP. SMOOTH WeTE PRTLAST STOLE- PROVIDE CAULK JOINT M SILL 1 S - ARORND MInT SILL- 7YP. — - - _ SLOPE GRADE "Y 19" --J 01.06.- SEE CIVIL DASHED LIMB INDICATE FOOTM65 r______________________ / E STR TION 89.0.9 GRADE SEE STRUCi. FIRE DEPr. LOCK BOX PREFM. 14 S• CCLLY4! COV9tr, D NORTH ELEVATION � RRTS E� P3 I/6•=1'-0• `{h 5ff ELEV. VA3 FOR. SIMILAR NOTES SILL FLASHING 4 WEPS - MIN 4•x6' - VFY. rJ STFWT. IT-•x16.6ALV. MTL. L OVAR - PAINT TO MATCH ADI 5LRPACE - ROD 4 SEAL Jr. FROMM PREFIN MTL 6UTTE2 t OOWL5POVr5 N/ 10' EXTET151016 0 DRIVE -LP CANOPY / ENTIRE 5" ELEV. TD. li 125'_7• rD 169' TO 6. IID' O WINDOW %\ BO. WII 6.102'8' TD. FIFI F -PROJIDE 98F ANGLE N/ 5LL FLASHIN6 1 HEEPr - MIN 4N6'- VFY. N/ STI4ICT. - W- 1W 6ALV. MIL LONER - PANT TO MATCH ADI SURFACE - ROD 4 SEPI_ JT. , , i ; __________________________________________________________..______________________.____� Q LOIM MS, a OV OF DRIVE -THRUSH Q LOOKMB 0 SCIRMI WALL / 516H Q SOUTH ELEVATION SEE ELEV. I/Ad FCR SIWLAR NOTES (� TD. PEAK T O. _. A . 125 6 -,Y r x..4 ;.L tr.�..z. '. x x�L_ � ti.T Ls� -.� x -r c ... r : u�'.'�.��rT'Y• ' [ r _ �, rTr-�f+—�, � U ' _ �, x _r ii '.- ' PRtEAK MTL BOX FOR LASE 51,51P6E BY OWER ON W. FF -"NS- REC, f.ONTR. TO PROVIDE 150)(55 POY TO. FAVE Palm TO. .ri'1--i•!.i_y-,r.i'z`r't _ �-..:�.s:.'._ S4:_ __. L-+..ur. `.�.-:?r?a�.->•4fi 4'rr.4'.a7i. T o o = 0 8 EL 112'-81 :a 1 'tom. '� BO. SOFFR Jl EL 112'-4• PREFNt WHITE MIL. SOFFIT 4 TRY. OVER 3/4• EXT GRADE `•�' -'$' %~`>_: � - PLY. 4 TRTD. W2. BLOLKIN6 COVES BEYOND .� �" �- -_ T r•' _ .,, _ FILMON 6LLAIENT 5 _ - PR TS (431-5264065) OREGAL 6.100'-0' T F R OL EL 100'-0' ______________________ ' ' FRPAGYP�BD t� - � 6'COG. ISIND __________________________________________ eWMO({9 IN RE5TROO.` PWK ADE HEAD RUES NEST ELEVATION EXT W�DMFRA t__ ; T>YRAW 4 P.51LII� BY BANK ECYAP. SLPf41ER- BY OYYSt /� TD PFAKLATION NOTE, LO/vER, MITE SIZE ALL DImESLON NOTES REFER To THIS DISTANCE (M •cr4x x'�[x r '. r.iL•4� x: .:T�,x-� �i��+is �xt`Tr ifT tlit�r sSTTf fi'-r S'�r YrilxTr .Try tr�n T4 r t- ` TD PEAK �1 MLFE5) OF PRORWISIOH FROM THE FACE OF AD.WCB.i r'r• r'• r .xsr[ = Lx r -[r -`s--'='>*.� x - y .r t [ Tz:zx Ir itrx'ys..'.�"rr�s.r'"rt. T: r Y' -ti ''-° i t EL. 123'-'I' x s'�t^' r '� r[, i Z •rW �' r,a.`.cT[*� r-raT�Y�-.r.iJ 4x' i1.r � t 1- .r. ?7"y..,.r' Y Y :; c �r - •-r. r rf Y.r x �_ � BRICKHITH THE EXCEPTION OFDETAILS 1. 213 WICH 5F0W THEIR ZERO ELEVATION POINTS. 'u ''7 ti; .xx� .rS� isfi y=i x'Tx5'ri4 s 'r r. l.�y -<'4r S arslt�r4T-4`-•r'c'ri rTt1.xC�rr-z `rr- �' TCF Btil\ 6 al EAVE EL IIS'-l'- �BO a5 112 EL II2'i' 4•�t 2, O: LJ n" f. _rf o -:-LJ.. 66A..n2S �f1T S 3V2 Q1/2#,6 .2LM T 'i N ftHY : <_�, SEE MZV. I/Ai FOR � �O� PYNOTES a2 al V2N -0-T. . FIN F1100- a2 ENG W -L W RE ENCLO LRE R E i----- -----' EAST ELEVATION S ENTRY ELEVATION r-%%# I EXHIBIT L PLANT SCHEDULE Broadleaf Deridunuc Quantity Symbol SclentlFlc Nome Common Name Plonting Size 6 Taunton Yew GledItsln Tria. 'Skycole' Skyllne Locust 2 1/2' -Cal 4 © Fraxlnus nigra 'FaUgold' Faltgold Ash 2 1/2' -Cal 4 44 Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Sllk' Ivory Silk Lilac 2 -Cal 3 ® Malus 'Madonna' Madonna Crabapple 2 -Cal 5 Acer x freemanli 'Je Ffersred' Autumn Blaze Maple 2' -Cat rnniosm I,-------- gu¢ntity Symbol Scientific Name Common Name Planting Size 10 Q Tnxus x media 'Taunton' Taunton Yew 5 -Gal 17 0 Junlperus Snbina 'Munn Calgary Carpet Juniper 5 -Gal 15 Q Ijuniperus chinensls 'Mint Julep' IMInt Julep juniper 5-Gnl Peremninl Quantity Symbol SclentlFlc Name I Common Name Pt¢nting Size 8 Sedum 'Autumn Joy' Isedum Autumn Joy 1 -Gal 7 Calamagrostis 'Karl Foerster' Feather Reed Grass =1 -Gat 73 N, x fnasenll 'Walkers Low' Walkers Low Nepetn -1 1 -Gal 44 Hemerocalis 'Happy Returns' I Happy Returns Daylily 1 -Gal Shrub IC - Quantity Synbol Scientific Name I Common Name I Planting Size 8 a N Hydrangea macrophytla 'Endless Summer' JEmdtess Summer Hydgrange 3-Ga1 40 Q Splrea japonica 'Little Princess' Little Princess Splrea 3-Ga1 12 Cornus alba 'Bnllhalo' Ivory Halo Dogwood 3 -Gal 10 Spirea japonica 'Alpin' Alpine Spirea 2 -Gal 20 Syringo meyerl 'Palibin' Dwf. Korean Lilac 3-G¢I 17 O Spirea x 'Gotcimound' Goldmound Spirea 3 -Gal LND5GAPE Ng1ES. I. AN pmtbgs !t dl be Ina to nam ad We h acord— with Asner$m" Stadad,. No daragsd or eco -ed bees or stabs will be accepted 2 PWN sal shall be a MIAWe of I Pat Pool, 1 Pat sod ad 1 pat sad 3. All plmb shall be jor mleod for aro year Iran 6n date of acaptanre, fie kind—pe c kodor Oiall replace aN dead or drms3ed pons d ro addlil—I cost to Ne owner"Nre —. Period 4. All tees mall be stoked ab wrryprA m siren b the Mals. 5. All trees h sod saps shod h— a 4• deep sIY d&d bark: nwkh maft— trod, 5' h dkmeter. 6. Sod stall d, cultred Kenhrky Bhngdss Free of wood, od ckwps. The loKerepe coOnxior sidI water ad roll the sod d the tsne a WAdldlon to msae a smooth sutara. All sod on ebpes geder F- 3 to I shill In sk*vd Ay sod darogd due fa slldby shall d, WbP .d by the laii," cat—tor. 7. AN** bods ord areas hg ldk tad m recdvrod; nekh sMll receive a 4' deep Iola of eollkobr (rlvw rod) rock with ovor niter fdsk. Rack Mulch shill be 11/7- 2' In dimmer. All gaud cava sem sial roc a 2• layer of rock m&A wlh ro FNter fdr . 6. All sem where sod ad mrldr troch shall I— a Valley View or Cobra "po4 edger m shall h td, detats. 4. AN Prodld xbsttutbre =A to approved try sats, gewd codrator or bdcape ardtted pia to hslalkMm SPREAD n 51TE PLAN DA55 LAKE ROAD 1"e 20'-0• 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. O m °zg • PLANT SG THAT TOP OF ROOT V} a N BALL IS EVEN WITH THE o dq FINISHED GRADE 2 • PAINT ALL CUTS OVER 1" DIA. • FLAG GUYING WIRES WITH 0 SURVEYOR TAPE J � lJ- Z C U 3 3 a a � J m 33 � 3 W z W i Q i W Cn CO r• � M r � o W -6 W _ U z W M J Lu � W 0 RUBBER HOSE I" DIA. Cn C/3 > > c FORM SAUCER WITH ° 3" CONTINUOUS RIM V�,. 3" MULCH ' .... I GUYING WIRES 2 STRAND TWIST 72 WAGE PARE T•FORM z SPECIFIED PLANRNG �" l— I= " "" 3 2%4X24PRESS TREATED I SAUCER MULCH a� IX . .WATER &TAMP'' O REMOVE AIR 1� I I— I—I I C STAKES - TOP OF STAKE 6" ABOVE GROUND I POCKETS I='I J I C� I Mix I WATER TERP k TA TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS — .. Iei TT�i T III III I NOTE: iL STAKING AS REWIRED 2 X BALL DIA. SHRUB PLANTING TREE PLANTING - GUY WIRES SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SCALE NOT TO SCALE n 51TE PLAN DA55 LAKE ROAD 1"e 20'-0• 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. O m °zg V} a N 3 o dq 2 taxa. 4 }rErr� Z J � lJ- Z C U 3 a a � J m 33 � 3 W z W i Q i W Cn CO W 0 -6 W _ U z pip �— M J Lu W `S J Q Cn C/3 > Cn U F--- m U L1 ( EXHIBIT M 'ATISTICS cnpbcm Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min Zone ill 0 1.7 fc 9.8 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Label MH Orientation Symbol Label Ory Catalog Number Description Lamp Lumens LLF 0.0 C 20.0 0.0 DIECAST TYPE IV, 250 WATT METAL 20,0 0.0 O A 0 KAD 250M R4 SHORT, CUTOFF HALIDE - HORIZONTAL 19500 0.72 ° E 20.0 90.0 LUMINAIRE BURN 20.0 -90.0 ❑ D 20.0 -90.0 DIECAST TYPE IV, 250 WATT METAL 20.0 0.0 0.0 B 2 KAD 250M R4 SHORT, CUTOFF HALIDE - HORIZONTAL 19500 0.72 ❑ LUMINAIRE BURN ❑ DIE-CAST CUTOFF 250 WATT METAL C 2 KAD 250M R3 LUMINAIRE HALIDE 19500 0.72 DIE-CAST CUTOFF 250 WATT METAL ❑ D 4 KAD 250M R3 LUMINAIRE HALIDE 19500 0.72 AREA LIGHT WITH HIGH ONE 250 -WATT CLEAR ❑ E 3 KAD 250M SR4SC PERFORMANCE SR4SC ED -28 METAL HALIDE, 20000 0.72 ° OPTICS, CLEAR FLAT HORIZONTAL POS. GLASS. LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS Label MH Orientation TiH B 20.0 0.0 0.0 B 20.0 0.0 0.0 C 20.0 0.0 0.0 C 20,0 0.0 0.0 D 20.0 180.0 0.0 E 20.0 90.0 0.0 E 20.0 90.0 0.0 D 20.0 -90.0 0.0 D 20.0 -90.0 0.0 E 20.0 0.0 0.0 D 20.0 0.0 0.0 Davis 8 Associates, Inc. does not assume responsibility for the interpretation of this calculation, or compliance to lora) or state lighting codes and ordinances. b.0 bo b.+ b.1 b.1 V2 b.2 b.2 b.2 b2 b.2 b.1 ba b.1 bo b.o b.o 9b.0 b.0 $.1 $.1 b.2 b.3 9b.4 b.5 1b.5 b.5 VA b.2 b.2 b.1 b.t b.0 b.o b.0 41 b.1 62 b.3 b.7 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.3 b.9 b.5 b2 b.2 b.t b.+ Vo b.1 t b2 0.3 b.5 9.t 2.5 2s 2.5 3.1 1e b.7 ba b2 ba $.1 b.1 9b b.2 b3 .5 9b,7 1.fi 1.0 '4.2 9. $. s .9 .6 4 b2 b. It., ba b4 b.7 .a 1.4 1.9 $.5 b.5 3.1 3. s s z s b.6 $. b.z b2 b.4 b.7 1.2 1.7 2.0 1.s 2.0 2.0 1.s 2.0 1.9 19 1.9 1.5 9. b. b.3 b.2 b.4 b.9 1.5 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.5 1.6 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.3 14 %A b.4 b.z 9b.7 1.5 2s 3. s L2 1.0 1.2 2.0 2.2 1=4 .4 2.7 1.3 t.E b.3 41.4 $. 2.4 4i.61.5 iJ 4 $.9 A %A 2.0 $. b.4 $.d $. 2.4 $.2 O 7 S4 2.1 b.8 bd b.5 1. 2.5 $.0 t 2 5 .t 1.s b.6 2.6 B b.3 2.2 VA 11.4 b.5 1.1 9 1.5 $. .6 .5 2 1.6 'J9 $.1 .1 1.1 1.9 VG 111.5 b.7 1. 19 2.a 2.5 3.1 2.6 'Is 1.5 1.8 2.6 3.1 3.6 2s 1.e 110 b.7 1.1 1A 2.3 'JA bs 94 111 26 24 2.] 32 b.5 bs 3.1 2.2 '4,5 1.1 2.a bo 5. $. 5 4 .9 34 $.6 b4 7 $.8 3.7 7 .1 2 1.2 $s 9n n 3 $.6 94.5 1.E Va b.J11 Os $a 9. $ 7 .o .1 2.+ $.e9.01 $.5 !s 9. de b0 5.5 b. 1. 3 .e .5 2.a -4.3 *4.3 U 8 *46 2.0 1. 1.1 '0.l b.9 b.5 b.7 bs 1.1 'A 1.9 1.9 19 11 11 1.3 10 '.A 1.7 1A 1.2 a b.6 9.0 9.4 9� 2. 2.3 12t. 9. 9. 92 1< 1a .0 b.] b4 1.1 1.5 2.7 b. Y.e 2. 9. b9 a s 19 3.2 13 b.3 1 4 2.1 b.1 8 0 ' .1 .8 .6 A .1 2.4 $.5 9 1.9 0 0 0 o b.2 6 2.0 1.3 2.9 2.] 2. 2.5 1.3 6 41.4 b.8 1 99 '42 .1 14 1.9 32 .7 1.5 .8 1.3 1.4 .1 b9 b.t b. b.9 1.1 9 1.3 b.9 .6 VA b.1 $. 9.4 9. .9 1.2 b9 .5 b.4 b.0 b. 2.7 ts .9 1.3 1.0 1.7 b.6 b.1. b. 2.4 2.1 2.2 1.5 b.a b.5 9h.3 b.2 b.3 b.5 %A 1.a 2.5 1.8 1.0 b.t V 2.1 22 2.0 1.4 b9 s b2 b.3 ba bs 1/6t. 1 27 $7 .5 1.7 b.1 $. 1.z 1.3 14 92 bs .4 b.3 b.3 $,] 9..e 12 b.2 b. b.7 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.2 _ b.3 b.3 b.9 1.a 1.3 b.2 $. b.7 1.5 2.1 22 1.8 b.4 b.3 b.5 b.9 5 b.t b.3 b.6 1 4 2.5 2.0 b.3 b4 b..3 s 41.1 b2 1.3 25 F.3 2.1 1.0 b4 b.2 b.2 b.J b.5 $ )tb.1 b.t b.3 b.d b.e V.9 $.1 b.2 b..2 b. b.0 b.0 .0 .o .0 a .o .1 .1 .z .2 .t 1 b.t BASS LAKE ROAD SITE LIGHTING PLAN 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. B, 9. 10. 15 24 a Yx LL m� N Q q= o a 0� Y ss� Icwy d D pr. e Z R i =e �r2¢ S� Q � W B- W yy Lu W O z ozi v, F Z � a z Q 1 B � F � 'a Q T�nIF 15 24 a m� � VJ J ss� Icwy d D W Z W Q W Q -r- Lu W O z ozi v, m Z O Zz z Q cc C O m Y r U CC ¢ rr- �- m m U N� g� EXHIBIT N EXHIBIT 0 M E M O RA N D U M DATE: January 5, 2005 TO: PI ing Commission (January 10th meeting) FROM: John Sutter, Planner and Redevelopment Coordinator SUBJECT: Consider Application 2004-15 for Variances to reduce the front and side setbacks at 4628 Hampshire Avenue North. (Item continued from December 13, 2004 meeting.) A. BACKGROUND The property at 4628 Hampshire is 65 feet wide and 122.51 feet deep, with an area of 7,963 sq. ft. (0.18 acres). The house on the property is a 24' x 24' (576 sq. ft.) rambler with a basement. It also has a 20' x 20' one -car garage connected to the house by a 7 x 12' breezeway. It is located at the southeast corner of Hampshire Avenue and 46tH Place. The property is zoned R-1 Low Density Residential. The 1949 building permit for the house showed it being set back 34 feet from the front lot line along Hampshire. City code at the time required a minimum front setback of 30 feet. In fact, the house was built 20 feet from the front lot line. Therefore the house is an unlawful structure. It was not in compliance with the setback at the time it was built. The 1952 building permit for the garage and breezeway showed the garage being set back 32 feet from the front lot line along Hampshire, but did not indicate a setback from the south side lot line. City code at the time required a minimum front setback of 30 feet from the front lot line but no setback from the side lot line. In fact, the garage is set back 24 feet from the front lot line and 2 feet from the side lot line. Therefore the garage is an unlawful structure because it was not in compliance with the front setback at the time it was built. It is lawfully non -conforming with the side setback, however. It is also important to note that, because the garage is attached to the house, it is part of the principal structure. In fall 2004, the applicant, David Raley, entered into a purchase agreement for the property with the intent of building an addition onto the rear of the house and converting the breezeway to living space. He had an initial meeting with the Building Official to discuss the proposed project. As is typical in these situations, the information provided by Mr. Raley at this time fell short of a full building permit submittal. As a result, the Building Official was not aware that the existing house encroached 10 feet into the required setback. On Oct. 27, 2004, the city received a building permit application from -- Mr. Raley, including a site plan showing that the house did not meet the setback requirements. The building permit application was rejected because it would result in the expansion of a nonconforming structure. On Nov. 5, 2004, staff discussed the matter with Mr. Raley and explained the reasoning behind the no -expansion rule and the various options available if he were to go ahead with the purchase of the property. On Nov. 9, 2004, staff followed this up with a detailed explanation of the situation that was emailed to the realtor representing both parties in the property transaction. Mr. Raley then decided to proceed with the purchase of the property; the closing occurred on Nov. 18, 2004. Mr. Raley has applied for two variances, one to reduce the front setback from 30 feet to 20 feet, and the other to reduce the side setback from 5 feet to 2 feet. Notice of the Dec. 13, 2004 public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property on Nov. 29, 2004. The Planning Commission held the public hearing and voted 8-0 to continue this item to the next meeting to allow Mr. Raley to draw up revised plans showing compliance with at least the side setback. The following Exhibits are attached.- A. ttached:A. Narrative submitted by the applicant. B. Comments received from the public and petition circulated by the applicant. C. Email from city staff to realtor representing the buyer and seller. D. Aerial photo showing the location of the property. E. Site photos taken Dec. 6, 2004. F. Building plans submitted for house addition. G. Site plan originally submitted for house addition. H. Revised site plan with similar to original plan but in compliance with side setback. I. Revised site plan showing a different scenario in compliance with the side setback. J. Revised site plan showing remodeling of existing house. B. STAFF COMMENTS Note: The staff comments are essentially unchanged from the December 13, 2004 meeting. While the new information requested by the Planning Commission has been provided by the applicant, it does not address the issue of undue hardship. Therefore our recommended findings of fact to deny the requested variances are the same as those in the previous staff report. If the Planning Commission decides to recommend one or both the requested variances, then it should make findings of fact to be included in the report to the City Council so they understand the reasons for the variance(s). The house was built unlawfully because it was inconsistent with the issued permit and encroached 10 feet into the front setback required at the time. The house is therefore not lawfully non -conforming ("grandfathered in"). However, because it has been 55 years since the house was built, it is unlikely the city would at this time take the necessary legal action to require demolition of the house or correction of the setback violation. Instead, the city's policy would be to allow the house to continue to be used but not expanded, with the idea that eventually it would be demolished and replaced by a new, code compliant structure. Specifically, the Zoning Ordinance states that the repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance and improvement of non -conforming structures is generally allowed, but expansion is expressly prohibited. The intent is to preserve the property rights of VARIANCE - FRONT & SIDE SETBACKS AT 4628 HAMPSHIRE - REVISED 2 owners who are impacted by changes in regulations over time, while at the same time placing limits on non -conforming uses so that they are less likely to remain for the long term. In the case of the subject property, the ordinance would allow the existing house to be repaired and remodeled. But it cannot be expanded. Regarding the minimum front setback, this requirement is especially important in maintaining neighborhood character. It is readily viewed from the public street. The city has consistently required a 30' or greater minimum setback from the front lot line since 1940. There is nothing unusual about the size, shape or topography of the lot that would justify a setback variance. It is simply a case of a house being built in violation of the code and inconsistent with the issued building permit. Even if the house had been lawful at the time it was built, the city's goal is for non -conforming structures to eventually be eliminated or brought into compliance with city code. Allowing the proposed expansion of the house to proceed would probably preclude the eventual replacement of the house with a code compliant structure. It would likely make the 10 foot front setback encroachment a permanent feature of the neighborhood. Regarding the minimum side setback, this issue could be neutralized by removing the breezeway and making the existing attached garage into a detached garage, or by demolishing the existing attached garage and building a new detached garage in the rear yard. Either way, the garage would no longer be part of the principal structure (the house), and would no longer have any bearing on whether the house can be expanded. Therefore, staff believes that if a front setback variance were to be granted to allow the house to be expanded, then no side setback variance should be granted because it is easier to correct than the house setback issue, and such correction is likely given general trends towards a need for more garage space In order for a variance to be granted, state law and city code require that all three of the following criteria be met: ■ The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used as required by the code. ■ The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the property owner. ■ The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. In addition, state law and city code specifically state that economic considerations alone do not constitute an undue hardship if a reasonable use for the property exists under the code. C. RECOMMENDATION Denial of the requested variance to reduce the minimum front setback from 30 feet to 20 feet. Suggested findings of fact are as follows: Denial of the requested variance would not constitute an undue hardship in this particular case because none of the three required criteria are met. Specifically: The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used as required by this Zoning Code. If treated as a lawful non -conforming use, the existing VARIANCE - FRONT & SIDE SETBACKS AT 4628 HAMPSHIRE - REVISED 3 house may remain in place, and it may be repaired and improved but not expanded. ■ The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances created by the landowner, or his predecessors in ownership. The setback problem was initially created by previous owners, who built both the house and the garage in violation of city code and in a manner inconsistent with the permits issued by the city. Upon becoming aware of this problem, the current owner chose to continue with the purchase of the property. The variance, if granted, will alter the essential character of the locality. A 30 foot minimum setback requirement has long been the standard in Crystal. The variance will allow for the enlargement of the existing house to a degree that it is unlikely that it would ever be demolished. This would likely make the setback encroachment a permanent feature of the neighborhood. 2. Denial of the requested variance to reduce the minimum side setback from 5 feet to 2 feet. Suggested findings of fact are as follows: Denial of the requested variance would not constitute an undue hardship in this particular case because none of the three required criteria are met. Specifically: — The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used as required by this Zoning Code. If treated as a lawful non -conforming use, the attached garage may remain, and it may be repaired and improved but not expanded. Reasonable alternatives are available, including removing the breezeway to make the garage into a detached structure so it does not impact expansion of the house, or removing the garage and building a new, code compliant garage in the rear yard. ■ The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances created by the landowner. Upon becoming aware of garage having a nonconforming side setback, the current owner chose to continue with the purchase of the property. The variance, if granted, will alter the essential character of the locality. The 5 foot minimum side setback requirement is minimal enough, and the requested reduction to 2 feet could create real long-term issues due to the proximity of the adjacent property. Planning Commission action is requested. A separate motion on each requested variance (front setback and side setback) is suggested. Findings of fact addressing whether or not the three variance criteria are met should be included in each motion. VARIANCE - FRONT & SIDE SETBACKS AT 4628 HAMPSHIRE - REVISED 4 w a ay �tor�y✓� . w S;, '1 a( P) S --� 1.�-0�n�_�_►'v 12sotk�-V-t�NC�-------�!� G----j��-QP�rz.2TY__---�-.r ^� �=5----��-_----- _� rL._ �k+►v _raLo EI't P t=tL _—.} vim E-- --- ► _._(teat/ ►-L? ----- v�'.----- n ppr ss i i? .� 7 t Po C2m Vlnea4�� The new owner of 4628 Hampshire is requesting a variance from the City of Crystal in order to build an addition to the rear of his house. The current city ordinance states that the side setback must be a minimum or five feet and the front setback must be a minimum of 30 feet. The present house currently has a side setback of two feet and a front setback of 20 feet. The variance would allow for the construction of the addition meeting all city ordinances, but would leave the existing structure as is. We the undersigned have no objection to the City of Crystal granting a variance for the proposed construction. y .7LIf M 1e -��fGL� T t The new owner of 4628 Hampshire is requesting a variance from the City of Crystal in order to build an addition to the rear of his house. The current city ordinance states that the side setback must be a minimum or five feet and the front setback must be a minimum of 30 feet. The present house currently has a side setback of two feet and a front setback of 20 feet. The variance would allow for the construction of the addition meeting all city ordinances, but would leave the existing structure as is. We the undersigned have no objection to the City of Crystal granting a variance for the proposed construction. L'�'� w -i r •i vi '& t C i. f r zez i 70 i five i CS(1 7 F (, t;-() S 7� .._� 17 A/V X X The new owner of 4628 Hampshire is requesting a variance from the City of Crystal in order to build an addition to the rear of his house. The current city ordinance states that the side setback must be a minimum or five feet and the front setback must be a minimum of 30 feet. The present house currently has a side setback of two feet and a front setback of 20 feet. The variance would allow for the construction of the addition meeting all city ordinances, but would leave the existing stricture as is. We the undersigned have no objection to the City of Crystal granting a variance for the proposed c�nstn�ct;_ C - ' I rl 0 u 1;11-77��c'. TA q-7 0613 -,q G ,r'I P �_ yl la, 1 I 's h. "a Irn, AC TERRACE i FINTH lirl Ii71 no' i � Iv, '� 1Lr � 1 n IR, I ron Im 11ni I/„ I A�,r � ,.,r � AAI• ' , I1n un � I:n , � 1n, S I o1n r Inn do , Z I 1 , hn 3 do m ( 31' ADD% y+ Ifl ISI 1«) b) IS) - ISI AYE .n X 0 u C yea,-,, I � . wl I a„ i n I a IT: 1«1 i � 10 I n Ili, k_ — '•.l ul-- --n In In, iun I I u:r La n Ih, In I II I I Isl I 1/n I I • Im- w /- ...a....... mw..........:................................:................x.......p...._..........:n....•- —.n.........__ - I., , i All _i.• " ., L � @'iS F i I ! H tdtb I ! Im ! I L'S�f/ i„� II��` I •t� :................... j Iwr I rm ao I Iw � I I ' I m iI»,I m II,I In, ne, AODIEY CO Yttl r •..__,.s_._,wr_________ -------------_-------._ ' _aa.___:.___rs___ Eut. to I tIATKCE' ^'MlAl1X' AVVo mtmi° L` • Im- w /- : I, rw' I I�n ` .1 I C' Alk ! I., , i All _i.• " ., L � @'iS F i I ! H tdtb I ! Im ! I L'S�f/ i„� II��` I •t� m i Im I I E OMDI ! mlj In m I I !, .I�»n NINO. cm I ! ADD Iwr I rm ao I Iw � I I ' I m iI»,I m II,I In, ne, AODIEY CO Yttl r •..__,.s_._,wr_________ -------------_-------._ ' _aa.___:.___rs___ Eut. to I tIATKCE' ^'MlAl1X' AVVo mtmi° I __ _ _ _ .. ti ---- ! � www��e I«1 JI ,,y i � � 9 � I«1 IIY•1 i, ; -- �., 31ri - I 1 •: FI , J�' ,. X �. r _ � I I nl _ , I �,I nn � 191 1•' u j I r € `e a jr ',�� L •�_ 1 � � �.__.._..I -- —�yO►— -----� .+RAWH dZEF•S..R::� '», I»I rwl - 1», len 1 1A1 'i «,! -1 Oe _ •Uin 1 I lfl • I ' , I 1 Iy I,1 n», Iri„ F s' n A06PJ" w. • ISTH T Pl N •� .•.'r i " - _. _ _____ _�'s_TiI �____. pl o.rnrr9ur a_ _— _ --- a I� t /� ,,.. , I --- Ir.,R .♦' / „» Irn a In In„ 17.j� �p inr ' Irrr ` '• n �' r' I Irel � Inr Iwt e � 7 'a •n , , fm Ir» - In•I In, I n, I/, I ,nr Ixr Iris Im ),i Irin'�1r.» � ,rh, ,' •I• Irp, • I �7 _.-•�_ -- _.— _ Al V I,n1, pp , Ir/, ! ,rq —i I f-�6 , J. J_ f r" '�►1. -• ` I� 1 I•. r 1 i l i r . n �' r 9 ;� I P n• John Sutter From: John Sutter --Rent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 4:41 PM . o: 'PhilRustad@edinarealty.com' Cc: Jack Molin Subject: RE: Questions re 4628 Hampshire Dear Mr. Rustad, Jack Molin has forwarded your question to me. Both Jack and I met with Dave Raley Friday afternoon Nov. 5th and discussed the situation. Upon reviewing the building permit, we became aware that the existing house is nonconforming with the front setback (approx. 20' instead of the required 30') and the south side setback (approx. 2' instead of the required 5'). Both state law and city code prohibit the expansion of nonconforming structures. They can continue in place, and they can be maintained, but they cannot be enlarged. In the case of the subject property, this means that the various necessary improvements to the existing structure are allowed. However, we cannot issue a building permit for an addition to the existing structure. In our discussion with Mr. Raley, we explained that the side setback issue could be neutralized by removing the breezeway so as to make the existing attached garage into a detached garage. Because the garage would no longer be part of the principal structure (the house), the fact that the garage does not meet the required 5' side yard setback would no longer have any bearing on whether the house can be expanded. To avoid having to remove the breezeway, a variance to reduce the side yard setback from 5' to 2' would be required. In this case, city staff would almost certainly recommend denial of such a request due to the fact that the 2' setback would be extremely minimal, and because there is an alternative that would neutralize the issue as it relates to the proposed expansion of the house. This leaves the front setback issue, which unfortunately is much more significant. The building permit for the original house showed a front setback of 35' but in fact it appears to have been built with a setback of approximately 20'. Technically, the house ` even a lawful non -conforming use (commonly called "grandfathered in") because it was built out of compliance with the L—ding permit. However, setting that issue aside, if a variance were requested it would be seeking a reduction of the front setback from 30' to 20', which would be a significant reduction. Furthermore, the minimum front setback is especially important in maintaining neighborhood character, i.e. it is readily viewed from the public street, and the city has consistently required a 30' or greater minimum setback from the front lot line for several decades. Finally, there is nothing unusual about the size, shape or topography of the lot that would justify a setback variance. The main argument I see for a front yard setback variance is basically what you've already said, that the house has been there, out of compliance, for a long time... so why not let it be improved and expanded? I told Mr. Raley that he might have a strong argument for a variance based on the fact that the house had been there for a long time, and the fact that the building permit indicated a front setback in compliance with the code. However, I also gave him a copy of the 'three part test' for variances, which is found in both state statute and city code, and explained that it is difficult to meet all three criteria for a finding of undue hardship which is what the law requires for granting a variance. I explained that the Planning Commission and then the City Council would make the decision whether a variance would be granted, and that city staff cannot predict how either body might vote on the matter. I also made it clear to him I was unsure whether city staff could even recommend granting a variance in this case, especially since there is nothing unusual about the lot, and because of the fact that the house was originally built out of compliance with the issued building permit. On Friday we provided Mr. Raley with the variance application materials. The soonest possible timeline for considering such an application would be as follows: Nov. 19, 2004: Application due, including statement of undue hardship, site plan, and nonrefundable $200 fee. Dec. 13, 2004: Planning Commission holds the public hearing and considers the requested variance. Makes recommendation to the City Council Dec. 21, 2004: City Council takes action to approve or deny the requested variance. Regards, n Sutter .nner & Redevelopment Coordinator -----Original Message ----- From: Rustad, Phil [mailto:PhilRustad@edinarealty.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 11:33 AM 12/08/2004 eX C To: Jack Molin Subject: Questions re 4628 Hampshire Jack, I am the Realtor assisting both the Buyers and Seller on 4628 Hampshire. I am writing to find out what your opinion is regarding the addition the Buyers (Dave and Sandy Raley) would like to put on the home. I've spoken with Dave and he's told me about the set back issues. I'd like to know if you think their plan to convert the home into a 4 level split is a realistic one. Obviously, it's in the City of Crystal's best interest to transform this home into one that better fits the neighborhood by enlarging it and bringing it up to code with regard to the electrical service, bathroom and other issues raised in the city inspection. I'm sure that you can also understand that the Seller is a little befuddled by the set back problems. After all, the home has been there for 53 years. Can you let me know what the process is for the Buyers to get the required variance approval from the city. We have postponed the closing in order to allow time for this process. Please give me a call on my cell phone so we can discuss this. Thanks in advance, Phil Rustad Edina Realty, Plymouth Cell: 612-309-8245 Office: 763-557-4528 12/08/2004 T N t -,Ave ot 'F'u, ........... to i` , (_gyp. ms 1 •• Etc�Si�NC> Hv�g� al 22." r -),I-/ Naim/ v i E w P" (-6Sab AfDl (ii ori I � fa W7— v i e r.✓ Ex. F � yf� Tfin 401 �'i j is T. io Ex. F 22l I I a 34 b. 18• cus 4E � • � QED �- m � � lo'a DO u/N J-6• y P^�7,� ?v Rp.-6 f /d N P yd,* id { Tub .b /ss I Ns ��• aATN d ```W � fAN a /3ED m o r°• 28" 1al✓y Ali !4-gP'n I ?z' a 34 b. 18• cus 4E � • � QED �- m � � lo'a DO u/N J-6• y P^�7,� ?v Rp.-6 f /d N P yd,* id { Tub .b /ss I Ns ��• aATN d ```W � fAN a /3ED m o r°• 28" 1al✓y Ali !4-gP'n SARA � J `�- I -,c.sn ✓f Pow s i 2f I 3 4�6 0 Q 1 l7t w CSF DI-(7vNi zz" - o 6.7 — 3'4' �' 'T/Iss RAFT -e1,2 - ? "A 10, To;sT 3�s��0T'r'r ✓Ffa" Sl/ /rS QCT-�� 0(49 A^-7 *ixx.! e-4" C o,,,tyrs A overy G �rc F.-lleJ Every WAni f, -do f150 r —gx/G Co,.o ScAI[- %HrUiJL 9 wA-1 s� y U I1X/l Ss Pour Co✓L r L r/¢ed Td ExTe✓a G par %U��O✓ STQ��°'� y'' GONG /p:3 I I �'�Co✓c �/loaK ), Floor %:s7s NEw A,WIT/a-✓ /G raG Sr / No�sG E/T 1''"Eptri�'✓.e. a.Ar� I /i0 -C q•..vsa v.�iJ � -� I G.br Co"c F•Y! �� Qro;d T Le i gc1i( J ' F- I 13 I- IVC)f 7-W <---- sclq`c / , lC) I s: k Pl IZ C 49 i rre t s�E R/J�+iEo „r *or ; rzk— a . � � \ � \ k� �� J � § ~\ � \� « �/ Sc/;,`e 414��IVZ7c�e_ a Ex I 3v, �y �� d l i f� �i i p i €i i 1 I i CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS ON PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS December 21, 2004: 1. Approved a conditional use permit for auto repair -major at Asia Auto Center, 5264 West Broadway. 2. Denied a variance to increase the maximum fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet at 5331 Corvallis Avenue North. 3. Approved a lot division at 6401 41 st Avenue North to create a new parcel to be added to Hagemeister Pond Park. All of the Council's actions on the items above were consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations. Page 1 of 1 1212912004 CITY OF CRYSTAL Development Status Report December 31, 2004 SPECIAL LAND USE APPLICATIONS: Crystal Shopping Center (103 Willow Bend). On October 21, 2003, the City Council approved a site plan including construction of a new 54,000 sq. ft. building to house larger Marshall's and Michael's stores; demolition of part of the existing south building; general parking lot, landscaping and building facade improvements; and a variance to allow parking spaces between the west building's north end and 56th Avenue. Construction on the new building is complete; rovemenls has moved in ants and new facades for theMicharlest of expected to do so in early 2005. The p the shopping center are also nearly complete. 2. Forest Elementary School (6800 47th). On April 20, 2004, the City Council approved a conditional use permit including site & building plan review for a new 76,000 sq. ft. Forest Elementary School. Construction is underway and completion is expected by fall 2005. 3. Carpet King (5756 Lakeland). On July 6, 2004, the City Council approved site & building plans for a 15,543 sq. ft. commercial building on the former Embers property. Carpet King will occupy approximately 25% of the new building and the remainder will be leased out to other commercial tenants. The existing building, currently used by Carpet King on an interim basis, will be demolished upon completion of the new building. Construction on the new building has not yet begun. 4. Cavanagh facility (5400 Corvallis). OnSeptember foreSD 280104, the City to relocate it ouncil ff ghv'ewroved an interim, temporary Conditional Use Perm Alternative Program into the former Cavanagh Elementary School. The permit expires in one year and may not be extended for more than two successive years, unless ISD 281 secures a permanent CUP for the mcinstalls accommodate the new use arerequired by city code. Plumbing & mechanical improvements to complete, and Highview has now moved into the Cavanagh facility. 5. Highway 100 land use (excess right-of-way)- On October 19, 2004, the City Council amended the Comprehensive Plan to designate appropriate land uses on parcels of excess right-of-way adjacent to the horitwHwy 100 freeway. enext step willget the parcels surveyed e for the city's Economic Development Authority to work with MnDOT t and appraised for possible development. 6. Hagemeister Pond park expansions. On October 19, 2004, the City Council approved a lot division to detach the south 135 feet from 6517 41St and add it to the adjacent park. G:IPLANN/NGIGenera/IDevelopmentStatusReportsl2004-4th quarter.doc Page 1 of4 Similarly, on December 21, 2004 the City Council approved a lot division to detach the south 317 feet from 6401 41St and add it to the adjacent park. 7. Brunswick Villas (3148 Douglas) On December 6, 2004, the City Council approved a preliminary plat and rezoning request from SML Land Development for this vacant site on the south side of 32 ndbetween Douglas and Brunswick. The developer will be building 18 townhouse units configured in three buildings of 6 units each. Each unit's main floor will have 770 sq. ft., with a combined living -dining room, a kitchen, half bath, and mechanical room. Each unit's upper floor will have 1,158 sq. ft., with three bedrooms, a family room, a laundry and a full bath. Each unit will have its front door and a porch facing north, towards 32nd Avenue, and an attached 2 -car garage facing south. Due to soil conditions, the buildings will be built on pilings and will not have basements. The site improvements include a private service drive across the south side of the site to provide access to the garages. The developer has indicated that the units will probably sell for approximately $250,000 each. 8. Asia Auto Center (5264 West Broadway) On December 21, 2004, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for auto repair -major, which will permit major engine and transmission work as well as body and paint work. Because the property already has a modern building and up-to-date site improvements, no additional construction is anticipated. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SCATTERED SITE LOT SALES FOR NEW HOUSE CONSTRUCTION: _ 9. 3520 Kyle. In March 2003 the EDA purchased this property for demolition and lot sale. In July 2003 the EDA sold it to Golden Home Builders for $55,000. The new house is a 2 -story with 2,732 sq. ft. (1,806 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2%2 baths and a detached 2 -car garage. Construction is complete. The house is listed for sale at $274,800. 10. 5201 Maryland. In January 2003 the EDA purchased this property for rehab and re- sale. However, due to unforeseen problems with the house it was later determined that demolition and lot sale was the best course of action for this property. In November 2003 the EDA sold the lot to Feyereisen Construction for $70,000. They are building a new 2 -story house with 2,965 sq. ft. (1,925 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths and a detached garage. Construction is underway and completion is expected in early 2005. The builder already has a buyer for the house. 11. 641245 th In October 2003 the EDA purchased this property for demolition and lot sale. In March 2004 the EDA sold it to Avery Homes for $66,000. They are building a new 2 - story house with 3,036 sq. ft. (2,028 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths, and an attached 2 -car garage. Construction is underway and completion is expected by early 2005. The price of the new house has not been set by the builder. 12. 3415 Zane. In July 2003 the EDA purchased this property for demolition and lot sale. In May 2004 the EDA sold it to Avery Homes for $70,000. They are building a new 2 - story house with 3,627 sq. ft. (2,339 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths, and an attached G:IPLANNINGIGeneraADevelopmentStatusReportsl2004-4th quarter.doc Page 2 of 2 -car garage. Construction is complete except for landscaping which the homeowner must complete by June 30, 2005. The house sold for $355,000 in November 2004. 13. 3512 Brunswick. In January 2003 the City of Crystal gained title to this property after condemning it due to water damage and extreme mold contamination. The former owner challenged the condemnation in District Court but the city prevailed. The former owner then appealed to the MN Court of Appeals, but in December 2003 the court ruled in favor of the city. In January 2004, the MN Supreme Court declined the former owner's request for review. The city demolished the house in March 2004 and transferred title to the EDA. In June 2004 the EDA sold the lot to Feyereisen Construction for $70,000. They are -building a new 2 -story house with 3,844 sq. ft. (2,377 finished), 4 bedrooms, 3 baths, and an attached 3 -car garage. Construction is underway and completion is expected by early 2005. The builder already has a buyer for the house. 14. 5200 35th.* In August 2004 the EDA sold this lot to Golden Home Builders for $52,700. They will be building a new 2 -story house with 2,854 sq. ft. (1,872 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths, and an attached 3 -car garage. Construction is expected to begin in spring 2005. The price of the new house has not been set by the builder. 15. 521734 th Place.* In August 2004 the EDA sold this lot to Golden Home Builders for $57,000. They will be building a new 2 -story house with 2,883 sq. ft. (1,901 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths, and an attached 3 -car garage. Construction is expected to begin in spring 2005. The price of the new house has not been set by the builder. 16. 532434 th Place.* In September 2004 the EDA sold this lot to Accent Homes for $33,000. (The original $54,000 lot price was reduced $21,000 for costs related to soils.) They are building a new split level house with 2,779 sq. ft. (1,458 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, and an attached 2 -car garage. Construction is underway and completion is expected by early 2005. The price of the new house has not been set by the builder. 17. 541634 th Place.* In September 2004 the EDA sold this lot to Novak -Fleck for $56,533. (The original $58,000 lot price was reduced $1,467 for costs related to soils.) They are building a new 2 -story house with 2,730 sq. ft. (1,806 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths, and an attached 3 -car garage. Construction is underway and completion is expected by early 2005. The price of the new house has not been set by the builder. 18. 3557 Regent.* In September 2004 the EDA sold this lot to Novak -Fleck for $48,000. They will be building a new split foyer house with 2,373 sq. ft. (1,267 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, and an attached 3 -car garage. Completion is expected by early 2005. The builder already has a buyer for the house. *Note: Over a period of many years, the EDA had purchased and demolished the five preceding properties. Because the EDA recognized a potential need to redevelop the entire Crystal Heights area, these lots were held for possible future redevelopment instead of being sold for new house construction. Upon completion of a redevelopment feasibility study in early 2004, the EDA determined that redevelopment of the entire Crystal Heights area would not be feasible. Based on this determination, the EDA sold these five lots for new single family houses using the standard scattered site lot sale process. G:IPLANNINGIGenerallDevelopmentStatusReportsl2004-4th quarter.doc Page 3 of 4 19. Brunswick Fields. In the second half of 2003, the EDA purchased 4120, 4130 and 4140 Brunswick, each of which had a 100' wide lot. In the spring and summer of 2004, the EDA demolished the existing structures and then replatted the site into four lots for new house construction. Two of the new lots are 78' wide and two are 72' wide. In fall 2004, the EDA sold the four new house lots to Al Stobbe Homes for $340,000 ($85,000 per lot). Construction of all four houses is underway, in varying stages of completion. The prices of the new houses have not been set by the builder. Each of the four new houses is summarized below: ■ 4142 Brunswick: Lot is 78' wide x 135' deep. New house is a 2 -story with 3,877 sq. ft. (2,303 finished), 4 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths, and an attached 2 -car garage. ■ 4134 Brunswick: Lot is 72' wide x 135' deep. New house is a 2 -story with 3,335 sq. ft. (2,164 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths, and an attached 2 -car garage. ■ 4126 Brunswick: Lot is 78' wide x 135' deep. New house is a 1'/2 -story with 4,482 sq. ft. (2,682 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2 '/2 baths, and an attached 3 -car garage. ■ 4118 Brunswick: Lot is 72' wide x 135' deep. New house is a 2 -story with 3,880 sq. ft. (2,538 finished), 3 bedrooms, 2'/2 baths, and an attached 3 -car garage. 20. 6808 44th. In November 2004 the EDA sold this lot to MJB Custom Homes for $68,000. They are building a new 2 -story house with 3,642 sq. ft. (2,364 finished), 4 bedrooms, 2 1/2 baths, and an attached 2 -car garage. Completion is expected by spring 2005. The builder already has a buyer for the house. G:IPLANNINGIGeneraADevelopmentStatusReportsl2004-4th quarter.doc Page 4 of 4 \ L.: eA00"uN IAPM .... .... ...... _ .t •. WI 9A00w L,N CEh rcM . 1 -------------- i- NEW "a PIE , 1.10 .. i — a. „ e� 11 1 /, � (1 jLn 11 JF i ALA[Gil"D�UD LDD c 1 ' j� •.a CITY OF '5-,t .K�� • j CRYSTAL pp �C►I _: i II If II If -t rMt.' •rt (1 ,��1\ �("--� ♦.I -L S��E 3ac lood J , � Tw U.siK i of E eoee,�sru�1 r. .,l•.11 w. K Y. q W I y'I c s 'Q hI�� i „i aoee,so.�E � -L3 _.!n'1• ' _�� la ��t�l� :J „q 31 N I ,a 1. (�"" S.�f� I�_ .. all ; — 'l• n " r �1„lll___ �� a. 1�I� =I` m T. 7 16 lHl -J NEW kc .411 �' GOl0L4 wLLET i -�, Planning Commission for 2005 Title First Name Last Name Address Cit y State Zi p Code ' Date A ppointed � Phone Term � Expires �e-rr►ail address 'Council Liaison ReNae Bowman 3916 Edgewood Ave N Crystal MN 55427 01/04/2005 h- 763 531-2074 ( ) n/a 9Yloselyn(a�hotmail.com At-Large (Secretary) Michelle Strand 3430 Douglas Dr N Crystal MN 55422 07/02/2002 h- (763) 533-4675 2006 mstrand .nationalmap.com Ward 1 Joseph Sears 3301 Yates Ave N Crystal MN 55422 07/02/2002 h- (763) 535-0485 2005 Ward 1 Tom Davis 3342 Edgewood Ave N Crystal MN 55427 04/15/2003 h- (763) 533-1361 or w- (612) 348-6706 2006 td2847(a)cs.com Ward 2 Paul Whitenack 6424 - 40th Ave N Crystal MN 55427 08/02/2004 h - (763) 504-2888 or w - (612) 677-7395 2005 Ward 2 Rita Nystrom 3618 Adair Ave N Crystal MN 55422 02/17/1987 h - (763) 533-0727 2007 Ward 3 (Chair) Richard VonRueden 5130 Vera Cruz Ave N Crystal MN 55429 06/01/1993 h - (763) 533-7280 or w - (651) 770-2356 2005 Ward 3 (Vice Chair) Edwin J. Krueger, Jr. 5009 - 52nd Ave N Crystal MN 55429 04/01/1997 h - (763) 537-6351 2005 edkruegerna luno.com Ward 4 Lisa Atkinson 5840 Perry Ave N Crystal MN 55429 09/21/2004 h - (763) 537-0004 w - (763) 427-4589 2006 Ward 4 Jeff Hester 5854 West Broadway Crystal MN 55428 02/17/2004 h- (763) 531-0669 or w- (952)943-8359 2006 � I 'The Council Liaison is not a voting member of the Planning Commission. Staff: Patrick Peters Community Development Director (763) 531-1130 atrick. eters ci.c stal.mn.us John Sutter Planner & Redevelopment Coordinator (763) 531-1142 'ohn.sutter ci.c stal.mn.us Valerie Matthews Community Development Assistant 1 1(763) 531-1072 Ivalerie.matthews@ci.c!ystal.mn.us 9-member commission meets 2nd Monday of each month at 7 .m.. 2 Members from each Ward. 1 Member from City at Lar e. I:\Commi7-' ns\Commissions.xls ' 0J' 12005