Loading...
2006.03.13 PC Meeting PacketCRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SUMMARY March 13, 2006 7:00 p.m. Crystal City Hall — Council Chambers 4141 Douglas Dr N A. CALL TO ORDER B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • January 9, 2006 regular meeting* D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consider Application 2006-01 for a Conditional Use Permit for Fieldhouse Sports Tavern and Grill to establish a patio seating area for outdoor food and beverage service at 5632 West Broadway.* 2. Consider Application 2006-02 for a Preliminary Plat to divide 5817 36th Avenue North into two lots for new single family houses.* E. OLD BUSINESS F. NEW BUSINESS G. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City Council actions on recent Planning Commission items* 2. Staff preview of likely agenda items for April 10, 2006 meeting H. OPEN FORUM I. ADJOURNMENT *Items for which supporting material will be included in the meeting packet CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION January 9, 2006 A. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 pm with the following present: Sears, Davis, Nystrom, Whitenack, VonRueden, Hester, Brennan, and Strand. Also present were the following: City Council Liaison Joselyn, City Planner Sutter, Zoning Administrator Zimmerman and Recording Secretary Matthews. Chair Davis congratulated Commissioners Sears, Hester and Whitenack on their reappointment to the Planning Commission., and welcomed City Council member Joselyn back as the City Council liaison to the Planning Commission. B. ANNUAL ORGANIZATONAL MEETING 1. Election of Officers. a. Chairperson Commissioner Nystrom nominated and Commissioner Hester seconded the nomination of Tom Davis for Chairperson of the Planning Commission for year ending December 31, 2006. Motion carried b. Vice Chairperson Commissioner Nystrom nominated and Commissioner Whitenack seconded the nomination of Joe Sears for Vice Chairperson of the Planning Commission for year ending December 31, 2006. Motion carried Secretary Commissioner Nystrom nominated and Commissioner VonRueden seconded the nomination of Michelle Strand Secretary of the Planning Commission for year ending December 31, 2006. Motion carried C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Sears to approve the minutes of the November 14, 2005 regular meeting. Motion carried. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consider Application 2005-14 for Rezoning of 3249 Douglas Drive North from R-1 Low Density Residential to R-2 Medium Density Residential. —' Zoning Administrator Zimmermann summarized the staff report. Staff recommends approval as outlined in the staff report, and recommended findings of fact. Commissioner Nystrom asked if there are any recommendations in state law about how many of these facilities there can be in a community. Zoning Administrator Zimmermann stated that he does not know of any state law that limits the number of group homes. Zimmermann also stated that there haven't been any problems with the home on 32nd and Douglas. Commissioner Nystrom stated that she has a group home next to her and when there are problems she calls them directly and they take care of things promptly. She stated that there are however issues with cars coming and going constantly. Planner Sutter stated that he recollected from a previous application for a group home that at that particular time there we approximately 20-30 group homes out of approximately 7000 single family homes in Crystal. He also stated some cities have minimum separation requirements for group homes, but in Minneapolis similar limits have been legally problematic. Duane Reynolds spoke representing the applicant. He stated that they are willing to grant any easement that the City of Crystal may need on this property. Reynolds also stated that they are going to try and make it look a bit different from the 3200 Douglas home for the simple fact that something different situated to something so close will be more aesthetically pleasing. Public Hearing opened. Public Hearing closed. Planner Sutter stated that the motion of approval should include that the easement be addressed and that the approval is contingent upon an approved site plan. Moved by Commissioner Strand, seconded by Commissioner Sears, to recommend to City Council at the January 17, 2006 meeting to approve Application 2005-14 for Rezoning of 3249 Douglas Drive North from R-1 Low Density Residential to R-2 Medium Density Residential. Findings of fact are as outlined in the staff report. Motion carried. 2. Consider Application 2005-15 for a Variance to modify the setbacks requirements at 5330 Perry Ave North. Zoning Administrator Zimmermann summarized the staff report and recommended the findings of fact. Commissioner VonRueden asked if the deck had already been constructed. Zoning Administrator Zimmerman stated that yes it is. The City Building Official had come across the deck and contacted the homeowner to apply for a permit, and that is what triggered this variance application. Mark McApline of 5330 Perry Ave N stated that they tore down the old deck because they were worried about its safety with his children and grandchildren playing around and on it. They rebuilt the deck so it was nice, sturdy and no longer a danger. He stated that at the time he had no idea about the changes in the zoning code. Public hearing opened. Public hearing closed. Moved by Commissioner Whitenack and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to recommend to City Council at the January 17, 2006 meeting to approve Application 2005-15 for Variance to modify setback requirements at 5330 Perry Ave North. Findings of fact are as stated in the staff report. 3. Consider Application 2005-16 for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to create a Special Area Plan for unaddressed Canadian Pacific Railroad property north of the tracks and west of Douglas Drive, together with 5133 Idaho Avenue North. Planner Sutter summarized the staff report and findings of fact. Planner Sutter requested a brief recess at 7:38 pm and returned at 7:40 pm. Planner sutter continued to discuss potential changes to the resolution as drafted: that 5153 Idaho be guided Low Density Residential and not included in the Special Area Plan; and that the east end of the railroad property .be guided commercial not industrial. Chair Davis asked if we needed to modify the draft resolution to what Planner Sutter had just suggested. Planner Sutter stated that yes the draft resolution would be modified. Commissioner Strand asked if how wide the property is, and will there be access in and out all the way around the property. Planner Sutter replied that it is approximately 100 foot wide strip with the exception of the long warehouse that encroaches into the railroad setback. The railroad likes to keep about a 50 foot easement, so the long warehouse that encroaches in the setback might have to be demolished. Sutter continued that the Idaho access closed, they would have to design circulation all through the site, and this might set the bar a bit too high for the private business owner, but the primary consideration is to keep the traffic out of the residential area. Chair Davis asked if the access would only be closed on proposal of improvements, until then the access continues. Planner Sutter stated that is correct. Commissioner Sears asked if there has been any interest from commercial real estate brokers, or any study done; and that he would not like to see the existing business moved out and the area becoming a vast area of weeds. Sears continued that it doesn't have the best uses on it now but at least it isn't vacant. Planner Sutter stated that we have no way of knowing what will become of the property. However the city has had one lease holder come forward with an architect and a realtor to speak with us at a staff level. Discussion continued amongst the Planning Commission members and staff for clarification of the property status and the proposed amendment. Public hearing opened. Kathleen Siseman of 5319 Florida Ave N stated that she thought this area was designated park and preservation, and that 5153 Idaho Ave N was donated for that specific use. Planner Sutter replied that the city doesn't know anything about the history of that property. Siseman state she looked it up and found that it was donated with by the donors to be used as park as preservation. She expressed her concern about changing the designation of the property and the city not honoring the intent of the original donors. Chair Davis recommended to Siseman to express her concern to the City Council, and that they ultimately make the decision from the Planning Commission's recommendation. Planner Sutter stated that the owner's title search should have revealed the donation and the donor's intended use of the property. Chair Davis also suggested to Siseman that if she has any of the documents or knows where any of that information can be found if she could please contact Planner Sutter and give him that information. Judi Kieper from 6509 52nd Ave N expressed her concerns about losing any more of her property from upcoming changes to the railroad property. She stated that her and the neighbors that she spoke to would like to see the property remain the same. She continued that there really isn't really very much traffic. I want to put up a new fence and if any more land is taken from my property there isn't going to be any room for me to set the posts for a new fence. Kieper is very much opposed to semi trucks coming through the neighborhood using Idaho. Chair Davis explained that if any changes were to occur, they would come before the Planning Commission and you would have the opportunity to speak about your concerns at that point. Chair Davis explained to Kieper that what the city is trying to do is put a plan in place that would give the city some guideline for any changes that the businesses and/or railroad might want to make at some point. Travis Johnson from 6515 52nd Ave N expressed his concerns about the railroad property. Johnson would like to see some improvements in the area, and there is a tendency for people to speed through the alley back there. He would like to see the area blocked off so the business traffic could not access it. Johnson continued that with the gravel back there it is very loud and the honey factory is a very loud business. He stated it would be a good thing to allow the businesses to make improvements as long as the neighborhood has input on the changes. Chair Davis reiterated what Johnson had stated and Johnson agreed that yes that is what he wants. Commissioner Sears asked if Johnson's concern was that commercial traffic not drive through his neighborhood. Johnson stated that yes that is his concern. Commissioner Sears asked Planner Sutter if 5153 Idaho was a separate parcel. Planner Sutter stated that was correct. Commissioner Sears asked if there was a reason why the city couldn't put a barricade on the west end of the property. Planner Sutter stated that status quo does prevail and he doesn't think the city would have the right to go in and close off that point of access. If a private developer applied to us to make improvements then the city would have some say in that access point. It is simple an informal access way on private property that has occurred over the years and the city cannot impose a barricade except as part of a larger improvement project. Public Hearing closed Chair Davis suggested that the commission handle this in three parts. There was discussion amongst the commission members and staff as to how to handle this motion. Moved by Commissioner VonRueden and seconded by Commissioner Hester to recommend to City Council January 17`h, 2006 meeting to approve Application 2005- 16 for Comprehensive Plan Amendment to create a Special Area Plan for unaddressed Canadian Pacific Railroad property north of the of the tracks and west of Douglas Drive North not including 5153 Idaho; and that the land south of 5225 Douglas be guided Commercial not Industrial. Motion carried E. OLD BUSINESS F. NEW BUSINESS F. GENERAL INFORMATION The roster has been updated, with the public copy not including private information. Planner Sutter stated that no items have come in yet for the February meeting. The March meeting will have the annual work session and there will be more information to come as to when and what it will include. Commissioner VonRueden asked about the pawnshop on Highway 81. Planner Sutter stated that all of the aspects of the pawnshop are handled through licensing. The city has recently raised fees to help take care of the excess work that this business has created as far as background checks, policing, and communications with the city. G. OPEN FORUM H. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner VonRueden seconded by Commissioner Brennan to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Chair Davis Secretary Strand M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 8, 2006 TO: Planning Commission (March 13, 2006 Meeting) FROM: Jason Zimmermann, Code Enforcement and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Consider Application 2006-01 for a Conditional Use Permit for Fieldhouse Sports Tavern and Grill to establish a patio seating area for outdoor food and beverage service at 5632 West Broadway. A. BACKGROUND The property at 5632 West Broadway is part of the Crystal Town Center. The site consists of 5.44 acres. The property is zoned C-2, General Commercial. Restaurants are permitted principal uses in the C-2, General Commercial District. Fieldhouse Sports Tavern and Grill proposes a patio dining area on the west side of their space. A conditional use permit is required to have open or outdoor service as an accessory use. The following Exhibits are attached: A. Narrative submitted by the applicant. B. Aerial photo showing the location of the property. C. Site photos taken February 28, 2006. D. Site plan of proposed restaurant and outdoor patio seating. E. Fencing detail. B. STAFF COMMENTS Open or outdoor service is allowed in the C-2, General Commercial District as a conditional use. The specific requirements of the Zoning Ordinance are in italics below; staff comments follow each item: 1. The service area is hard surfaced and clearly designated on the site as being limited to the specific, approved area. STAFF COMMENTS: The service area is hard surfaced and the site plan shows fencing that clearly limits service to the proposed area. 2. The service area does not exceed 30% of the gross floor area of the principal use, 20% of the area of the property, or 2,000 square feet. STAFF COMMENTS: The service area is 626 square feet, or 8% of the gross floor area and less than I% of the area of the property. 3. The service area is fully screened from any R-1, R-2, or R-3 district. STAFF COMMENTS: Not applicable. The service area is not adjacent to any R- 1, R-2 or R-3 district. 4. The items to be placed outdoors are typically found outdoors and are constructed of materials appropriate for outdoor weather conditions. STAFF COMMENTS: The items to be placed outside consist of patio chairs, tables, umbrellas and a trash receptacle. 5. The city council finds that there will be adequate screening and buffering between the establishment and adjacent uses. STAFF COMMENTS: Not applicable; no such screening is necessary because all adjacent uses are commercial. 6. The city council determines that all applicable requirements of subsection 515.05, subdivision 3 a) and Section 520 are considered and satisfactorily met. 515.05 Subd. 3 a): In addition to specific standards or criteria included in the applicable district regulations, the following criteria shall be applied in determining whether to approve a conditional use permit request: ■ The consistency of the proposed use with the comprehensive plan. STAFF COMMENTS: The comprehensive plan includes the property in the area designated for Community Commercial on the future land use map. Among other things, this area is intended to accommodate the full range of non -automotive retail trade and service establishments which serve the entire community or sub -region. The proposed use is consistent with objectives, plan and policies for commercial and mixed use areas (pages 43-46 of the comprehensive plan). ■ The characteristics of the subject property as they relate to the proposed use. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed use is accessory to the current use as a restaurant, and the proposed use can be accommodated on the site. The impact of the proposed use on the surrounding area. STAFF COMMENTS: There are no foreseeable negative impacts on adjacent properties or the surrounding area, provided the staff recommended conditions are met. 520: Site Plan Review. STAFF COMMENTS: To preserve a minimum 5 feet clear width of sidewalk, the applicant shall work with staff to create a barrier along the curb so that vehicles parked adjacent to the seating area do not hang over the curb and reduce the sidewalk width to something less than 5 feet. C. RECOMMENDATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FIELDHOUSE PATIO SEATING - 5632 WEST BROADWAY 2 Staff recommends approval of Application 2006-01 for a conditional use permit for outdoor food and beverage service at Fieldhouse Sports Tavern and Grill, 5632 West Broadway. Suggested findings of fact and conditions of approval (should be referenced in the Planning Commission's motion): The proposed use would be consistent with city code, provided the following conditions are met: The Building Official and Fire Inspector shall inspect prior to opening, to ensure code compliance regarding exits and other life/safety issues. The patio shall not be used until the Building Official and Fire Inspector grant such approval. 2. Maximum occupancy for outdoor seating area shall be based on the number of seats. Prior to the patio being used, a sign shall be posted noting the maximum occupancy load to be determined by the Building Official and Fire Inspector. 3. No food preparation or other food equipment may be placed outside. 4. Tobacco smoke may not interfere with non-smoking patrons at entrances and exits. 5. Doors must be self closing and kept that way at all times. They may not be propped open or modified. 6. Floor/deck surfaces must be easily cleaned, durable and not create a safety issue (i.e., too slippery). Example: all concrete surfaces must be sealed. No areas of standing water may occur. 7. Furniture placed on outdoor areas must be easy to clean, resistant to weathering, and sufficiently weighted or otherwise secured to the patio. 8. A minimum of 5 feet of sidewalk width is to be maintained for accessibility to the restaurant and neighboring business. The applicant shall work with staff to create a barrier along the curb so that vehicles parked adjacent to the seating area do not hang over the curb and reduce the sidewalk width to something less than 5 feet. 9. At least one refuse container must be provided in the seating area, and must be emptied upon closing. The licensed establishment is responsible for litter and waste control. 10. Due to a greater potential for liquor control violations due to outdoor seating, the city may choose to implement compliance checks with greater frequency or in a different manner. Planning Commission action is requested. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FIELDHOUSE PATIO SEATING - 5632 WEST BROADWAY 3 repri DESIGN12400 Portland Avenue South Suite 100, Portland Corporate Center INC0121=+O f2ATE� o Burnsville, MN 55337 Date: February 17, 2006 City of Crystal John Sutter, Planner 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55422 Re: Fieldhouse Sports Tavern & Grill 5632 West Broadway Avenue -Outdoor Dining Mr. Sutter: The Fieldhouse Sports Tavern & Grill located at 5632 West Broadway Avenue would like to incorporate an area for outdoor dining. The attached plans depict the area and size. The proposed outdoor dining area will be accessed from the existing space via a new door from the existing waiting area. The area is shown to seat 20 occupants. The existing restroom's capacity is sufficient to handle the added occupant load. The outdoor space will be surrounded by a 36" high railing that will match existing standards ,.� dictated by existing conditions at other dining establishments in the center. An egress gate will be provided at the north end of the proposed space. Please feel free to call me if you have questions, comments, or need additional information. James Herget Vice President EXHIBIT A EJ600 V --1 518 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C 47 EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT C jm" OMYIH R CHECKED W JMH me Iii A-101 0 . oaerea euaoma to ewei,n sunea ,.xmume. mm. W e' -s• o J s• -e• t� a+owJ nKsueee a«. e. aro wurrora ex .0 ezre�uow ewerw coHcwR uwx rae �aa+ranaJ veiarr ra+•eera eme Derr *axes nur scar,n a Hea.�re• ro uier,n eu.oKn eraHoaiKoe, m. HlWKTaL eeR uV pleltlNlCCr YalOWp1E Owl.. r -o jm" OMYIH R CHECKED W JMH me Iii A-101 SPORTS TNVCRN 8 GRILL'I -Mom C� J1Wq ELEVATION . ..... W l' Z u U g �Wo A b5�£wx [t° 1 €gp fas'� f=f eft Fi4�x a € z 0 J W 0 h - Q a M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 8, 2006 TO: Planning Commission (March 13, 2006 meeting) FROM: �hn Sutter, Planner and Redevelopment Coordinator SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Consider Application 2006-02 for Preliminary Plat to divide 581736 t enue North into two lots for new single family houses. A. BACKGROUND 581736 th Avenue North (P.I.D. 21-118-21-21-0077) is located at the southeast corner of 36th and Zane Avenue. The Economic Development Authority of the City of Crystal ("the EDA") purchased the property in January 2006 for its scattered site redevelopment program. The EDA is proposing to plat the property into two lots to be addressed as 3548 and 3556 Zane. The lots would be sold to a builder for construction of a new single family house on each. To correct existing side setback nonconformities on adjacent properties, after the plat is approved, the EDA intends to sell the east 3 feet of the north lot (3556 Zane) to the owner of 5813 36th and the south 3 feet of the south lot (3548 Zane) to the owner of 3540 Zane. In addition to the two lots, the proposed plat dedicates the west 5 feet as right-of-way for Zane Avenue. The following Exhibits are attached: A. Aerial photo (taken 2004). B. Contour map (metric). C. Preliminary grading plan. D. Options for private utilities service. E. Preliminary Plat of Crystal Economic Development Authority Second Addition. F. Final Plat of Crystal Economic Development Authority Second Addition. Prior to Council consideration of the Preliminary Plat, the Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the matter. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Post on March 2, 2006 and mailed to all property owners within 350 feet. At the March 13, 2006 meeting, the Planning Commission will hold the public hearing and may make a recommendation for the City Council to consider at its March 21, 2006 meeting. PRELIMINARY PLAT - 5817 36TH (TO BE 3548 & 3556 ZANE) PAGE 1 OF 4 B. STAFF COMMENTS 1. Lot Dimensions. The proposed plat, Crystal Economic Development Authority Second Addition, would have two lots: LOT PROPOSED LOT WIDTH LOT DEPTH LOT AREA # ADDRESS (approx.) (approx.) (sq. ft.) 1 3548 Zane Avenue North 75 feet 106 feet 7,954 2 3556 Zane Avenue North 91 feet 106 feet 9,629 After the south 3 feet of Lot 1 and the east 3 feet of Lot 2 are sold to the adjacent owners to correct the existing side setback nonconformities, the lot dimensions would be as follows: LOT PROPOSED # ADDRESS 3548 Zane Avenue North 2 3556 Zane Avenue North LOT WIDTH LOT DEPTH LOT AREA (approx.) (approx.) (sq. ft.) 72 feet 106 feet 7,636 91 feet 103 feet 9,357 The property is zoned R-1 Low Density Residential. Section 515.33 Subd. 5 requires a minimum width of 60 feet, a minimum depth of 100 feet and a minimum area of 7,500 sq. ft. Both lots would meet these requirements. 2. Easements. Utility and drainage easements would cover the areas within 10 feet of a front or rear lot line and 5 feet of any side lot line. The 10 foot easement shown along the north (side street) lot line of Lot 2 (3556) should be increased to 20 feet on the Final Plat to guarantee greater -than -normal separation of the house or any future house additions from 36th Avenue. While this is not required by city code, it would be wise for the EDA to ensure a setback from 36th Avenue greater than the minimum 10 foot requirement of city code. The easements will facilitate utility installation and maintenance as well as space for grading and swales for drainage purposes. 3. Setbacks. Both parcels' front yards would face west towards Zane Avenue. Minimum setbacks are established in Section 515.33 Subd. 8: Front, 30 feet; rear, 30 feet; side, 5 feet; side street (corner lots), 10 feet. Both lots could easily accommodate new houses in compliance with the minimum setbacks. As noted above, increasing the utility & drainage easement along the north side of Lot 2 (3556) would have the effect of increasing the minimum setback from 10 feet to 20 feet. It is also important to note that eaves would only be allowed to extend into the front and rear setbacks; they could not extend into the side setbacks because those setbacks are coterminous with the easements which must be kept clear from ground to sky. Therefore, as a practical matter the side setbacks are likely to be a foot or two greater than shown on the preliminary grading plan. PRELIMINARY PLAT - 5817 36TH (TO BE 3548 & 3556 ZANE) PAGE 2 OF 4 4. Infrastructure. a. Public utilities (water and sanitary sewer). Lot 1 (3548 Zane) would be served by new water and sanitary sewer service lines connecting to existing mains in Zane Avenue. Lot 2 (3556 Zane) would be served by the existing house's service lines (water in Zane Avenue and sanitary sewer in 36th Avenue). b. Private utilities (electric, telephone and cable TV). The existing house is served by overhead utilities directly from a pole across 36th Avenue. The existing overhead lines would be rolled back to the pole across 36th prior to demolition. To service the new houses, the utilities could either (1) relocate the existing overhead line to a new pole in the northeast corner of Lot 2 (3556 Zane), install pedestals in that area, and have each house's service lines tie into the pedestals in that location; or (2) the owner of 5813 36th could grant the a utility and drainage easement across the north 10 feet of his property so the houses on the EDA lots could tie into new pedestals to be set at the base of the pole that's already there. The EDA, the owner of 5813 36th and Xcel energy are working together to determine which solution makes the most sense. C. Driveways. Both of the new houses would be required to install driveways to Zane Avenue. Lot 1 (3548 Zane) would use the existing curb cut. Lot 2 (3556 Zane) would be required to install a new curb cut. d. Drainage. The property is not served by storm sewer. The current topography is a gradual eastward slope becoming steeper as it approaches the east lot line. For the new houses, runoff from the driveways and the front half of the house roofs would be directed out to Zane Avenue where it would run in the street gutters to the nearest catch basin. Runoff from the rear of the house roofs and any accessory structures in the rear yards would follow the existing, natural drainage to the south and east. To accomplish this, the middle of each lot needs to be raised so a westward slope to Zane Avenue can be established as part of new house construction. After demolishing the existing structures on the property, the EDA would fill both lots to the 894 foot contour shown on the attached preliminary grading plan. Excess material from the new houses' basement excavations would be used by the builder to fill the north lot approximately one foot higher, and to place additional fill around both new houses to create a gradual slope down and out from each house to tie into the contours shown on the preliminary grading plan. 5 Park Dedication Fee. Section 510 of City Code requires that a park dedication fee of $1,000 be paid for the net gain of one housing unit on the property. The EDA will pay this fee to the city's park improvement fund before the plat is recorded with Hennepin County. Park dedication fees are used to make capital improvements to the park and recreation system. PRELIMINARY PLAT - 5817 36TH (TO BE 3548 & 3556 ZANE) PAGE 3 OF 4 6. SAC charges. The EDA will pay the $1,550 Sewer Availability Charge levied by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for the net gain of one housing unit of the property. C. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Application 2006-02 for Preliminary Plat to divide 5817 36th Avenue North into two lots for new single family houses. Finding of fact is that the proposed plat would be consistent with the requirements of Crystal City Code. While not required by the code, the utility and drainage easement along the north side of Lot 2 (3556 Zane) should be increased from 10 feet to 20 feet. The Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the request for City Council consideration. The City Council would consider a resolution approving the Preliminary Plat at its next regular meeting on March 21, 2006. PRELIMINARY PLAT - 5817 36T" (TO BE 3548 & 3556 ZANE) PAGE 4 OF 4 rn 0 HCPropert ffo►mc�plm D out w w a Mei �p Hennepin County Property Map Give_ usvour_feedback or suggestions Hpnnpnin C nirnty Ci�rvov�r mon n. 1.. 4 Recenter on click 0 Yes O No A"ftA100 , Last update: 2/24/2006 at 3:30 PM -- READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Click for detailed information .,on_this _parcel Property ID Approximate Property Perimeter Approximate Property Area 21-118-21-21-0077 548 ft. 18,062 sq.ft. = 0.41 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2006) — 're Iof..2 How-to use Map Lot dimensions may be 169 because they are it PROPE=SF- For quicker respc information on su 'Recenter on clici Show: 0 Aerial Photos I 0 2004" Aerials I OCity Names Street Names Address Numt El Lot Dimension 'Mpls. aerials south of F from 2003 Lot lines_different f T N http:Hwwwl3.co.hennepin.mn.us/publicparcelimage/hcpropertymap.aspx?PID=2111821210077 03/07/2006 20 PftUMWA4Y 895 concrete cane• curb 3.21 110,8 Plat) 895.0 ° + r , 891.64 .0 4 sidewalk yw j106;2 Proposed Utility Qrain$ge Easemen ; 10 `° 13 w „ ( 8'�Mapie o + ( .' �; � : � EST: '[b� O� 1 v� ( • ( MEW NoasE 1 1 � � v /66 94 (; '� 891-47 • ` Of �} 4.48 '1'Yn''-tFT LO 106.07 Pan Yoe O ( Proposed Utility and aina r-+ ° II Easement O O . •8�3' • 1 4Q` ( 2B"Maple 10 ( 3B ,M�e o Or. 'bP of a >� NOW fchorn �►1►�tD4't'fDAi �mov 2.6 1 892. t I 10 J LO; Br} ." min y Ur i veva - (169 22 B93.1 89 9�( 2 ople 89 Gill 7 Q.B \ i 894.79 893.05 -North line a EX . C 215 feet of tat ented. IICPropertyMap nPnr)t%& A- Hennepin County Proper ty-MapLG-21i V—e—U-S- V 0 U r f e e d b a ck p Henn eknG rn :jqu -- ty-- Recentei on click Yes 1. No APP*&#C. 1" � 50' NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE Page I of 2 How to i-ise Map PROPIAW All For quicker respc information on su 'Recenter on clicl Show: Aerial Photos I 2004* Aerials I City Names Street Names Ey'lAddress Numt E Lot Dimension *MpIs. aerials south of F from 2003 Lot lines different i I N � http://W"114 -,o.hennepin.mn-us/publicparcelimage/hepropertymap.aspx:� 1=2111821210077 r )7/200f) f 1CPropert RIM out RM M W,M am M= "M Um am mm q 1z smat Kv W Recenter on click o.' Yes No RP 0r C 4�- Hennepin County Property Prap Give us your feedback or suwestions Hennepin County Survevor man nmrfi irtc. APpfZGpC. 1 " � SOS NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE ' e I of How to Use Map I PR*PFAW For quicker respc information on su 'Recenter on clicl Show: Aerial Photos 2004* Aerials I Lv�jl City Names r;;�, L Street Names Address Numt Lot Dimension *MpIs. aerials south of F from 2003 Lot lines different i http://wwwl 3.co.hennepin.nm.us/publicparcelimage/hcpropertymap.aspx?PID=2111821210077 03/07/2006 C 80 36TH AVENUE_ NORTH R 95 0 concrete cone curb 89321 •...... a '}10,6 Plnt •, 891.84 895.0 89 4 eid...lk U •• 9t.d 25 20 o I 106.29 891, bo r -„Ay ''Proposetl UGGIy e IT4I f,,,I 4 prelnage Easement 8� I �ry , ' 10"Ash �'� -� O 10 I vd 9 {•. 13 •„' I , 'Z' { W I”"• •7"Cedar � O SCALE N FEET •. 7 . • I x.ct - .. .... 884.. 894As , n ' 0 10 20 40 60 a94.4s z No, 589 ME W� noi4 I 66`Made �- LEGEND — L— 47.6 .0 894.7 " � `"�" —89? 1 Owner 8 Developer - of 108.07,.... ` -- O = Denotes Iron Monument 41Al Douglas Drive N. — — — — _ _ O Cr Crystal, Mn. 55422 O o I Proposed Utfllly and Drains — Easement I l 53.1 - c John Sutter Phone - 763-531-1142 p 36"Mdple : S f Description: 736 10 M3 le { I op O a. Lots 6, except the Southerly 215 feet thereof, Block 2, "Rosedale Acres", according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate In Hennepin County, Minnesota. .77 $ {" 1 '• .g91 "V) r Total Area = 18,413 sq.ft. .. W m -,to be removed— hscn r.nce ° ..' Lot Areas; z59 sszs I n Lot 1, Block 1 = 7954 sq.ft. •'. � 1D -uni Lot 2, Block 1 = 9629 sq.ft. Bi nos Ur ivewoy dg '„(.' All lot distances 892.8 I 892.2,592- ; I are approximate and subject to change p 9e on final lat. ' ' - ®93.1 92'9 ".I_—._�-- 26 Maple All lots to be served by City sewer and water. .894 _ _ ,' � .. Current Property Address: 5817 36TH AVENUE N . •..... •. Hr CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 894.79 e9a89.3 os y fy� -North line of the Sooth 215 feet o7 Lat 6 aS Mon--tetl, i..i i„ •' ORIGINAL DATE, Feb 7, 2006 DESIGNED BY; I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT, PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR PREPARED BY: PRELIMINARY PLAT DRAWN BY: T.L.H. REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. CHECKED BY C.F.A. AND TFLORI AMA DULY REGISTERED LAND LAND SURVEYORS CRYSTAL ECONOMIC REVISIONS: THE LAWS OF THE SURVEYSTATE OF MINNESOTA. 7601 73RD AVE. NO. DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BROOKLYN PARK, MN 5542E SECOND ADDITION Ph (763) 560••3003 Signed Fx. (763) 560-3522 /TERRY/5UBU/kua0de ��rem/p.er .0 Chanes F. er4 Minn. Rep, No.21763 or Gregory R. asd% Nh n. Rep. No.24992 F.S. No. 1020-°2 Inv. No. 73644 C i U W CRYSTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SECOND ADDITION R.T Doc. No. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Economic Development Authority of ft City of Crystal, a public body corporate and politic, fee owner of the following described property situate In the Courtly of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 6, except the Southerly 215 feet thereof. Boric 2, "Rosedale Acres", Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as CRYSTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SECOND ADDITION and does hereby donate and dedicate to the '— public for public use forever the easements for utility and drainage purposes and ft Avenue as shown on the plat, In witness whereof said , Economic Development Authority of the City of Crystal, has caused these presets to be signed by its proper officers this_ day of , 2006. n (110.89 Plat) By .......... S88°36'51"E 1 1 1 2 9 ....... • Laurie Ann Moore, President Aire L. Norris, Executive (rector 108,29 26 I 20 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA — — — _ _ _ _ _ , COUNTY OF instnmtent was ec The foregoing Nedged before me this day of , 2006, by Laude Ann Moore, President and Anna L. Norris, Executive Director of J/ Utilly and Drainage- _ _I Economic Development Authority of the City of Crystal, a py corporate a poXLc, on behalf of said public body. utilic bod `. ,/ Easement I �, I o 10 I i 13 _ O z 2 •.: - Notary Public County, Minnesota ., t` ( I '•1 A. My Commission Expire o I ; I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the land described on this plat of CRYSTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SECOND ADDITION; that this plot is a �0 W 8 ' I ro ro correct representation of the survey; that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed In the ground ^ as shown on said plat that the outside boundary are correctly designated on said plat; and that there are no wetlands, as defined in MS 505.02, Subd. 1 to be designated on said plat. > ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS I I BASED ON AN ASSUMED BASIS. Gregory R. Piasch, Lard Surveyor W Minnesota License No. 24992 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OFHENNEPIN O '•- " N88°38'23"W N ,06.07 SCALE IN FEET The foregoing surveyors certificate was acknowledged before me this day of , 2006, by Gregory R. Prasch, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 24992. O n _ '— — -- `— — _ _ _ _ _ O - ---- -- ---- fes—" O W I Ullity and Drainage Easa-es —, 0 10 20 40 60 I ( O N I Q I z10 o Therese Preach, Notary Public, Hennepin o5ry, Mirnesota g My Commission Explres January 31, 2010 •• • • I ^ • ^ o DENOTES 1/2 NCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE $ MONUMENT SET AND ENSE ROTHERWISE KED BY C i•� I i••� I NUMBER 24992, UNLESS INDICATED. COUNCIL OF CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 10 F::; This plat of CRYSTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Crystal, Minnesota, thereof held this . �. •, • DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT. at a regular meeting day of , 2006. If applicable the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have can received by the city or prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided I by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. '^^' CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA r "' I L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r • •' m 105.99 25 20 •......... N88°37'26"W 110.99 By By��-North aNse J. Bowntan, Mayor Janet K Levels, City Cle Ilne o/ the South 215 feat of lot 6 TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT `• •' •' I hereby certify that the taxes payable in, and prior years have been paid for land described in this plat. Dated this _ day of, 200e. ' •.J 3. Patrick H. O'Connor, Hennepin County Auditor By Deputy , SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin Cowry, Minnesota Pursue rd to Minnesota Statuies, Sec. 3838.565 (1969) this plat has been approved this _ day of , 2008. William P. Brown, Hennepin County Surveyor By REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin Courtly, Minnesota 1 hereby certify that the within plat of CRYSTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SECOND ADDITION was filed in this office this day of 2006, at o'clock_ M. LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS Michael H. Cuxllff, Registrar of Titian BY Deputy i U W CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS ON PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS January 17, 2006: ■ Approved a Variance to modify setback requirements at 5330 Perry Avenue North. February 7, 2006: ■ Approved the Rezoning of 3249 Douglas Drive North from R-1 Low Density Residential to R-2 Medium Density Residential. ■ Approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to modify the Future Land Use map and create a Special Area Plan for unaddressed Canadian Pacific Railroad property north of the railroad tracks and west of Douglas Drive. The Council's actions on these items were consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations.