The URL can be used to link to this page

2007.11.13 PC Meeting PacketCRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SUMMARY Tuesday, November 13, 2007** 7:00 p.m. Crystal City Hall - Council Chambers 4141 Douglas Dr N A. CALL TO ORDER B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 8, 2007 regular meeting* C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consider Application 2007-13 for a Variance to eliminate the rear (south) setback at 3550 Hampshire Avenue North.* 2. Consider Application 2007-14 for a Low Density Residential Planned Development at 4908 & 4910 Bernard Avenue North.* D. OLD BUSINESS E. NEW BUSINESS F. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City Council actions on recent Planning Commission items* 2. Staff preview of likely agenda items for December 10, 2007 meeting 3. Reminder: Comprehensive Plan Task Force Open House 6-8 p.m. on Nov. 15t" G. OPEN FORUM H. ADJOURNMENT *Items for which supporting material will be included in the meeting packet **Due to the city's observance of the Veterans Day holiday on Monday, November 12rn, we have rescheduled the Planning Commission meeting to the following day. We apologize for any inconvenience. CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 8, 2007 A. CALL TO ORDER Page 1 of 7 The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the following members present: Not Present Commissioner X Commissioner (Ward 2) X Commissioner (Ward 4) (Ward 1) Sears [Vice Chair] Whitenack [Chair] Hester [Secretary] X Commissioner (Ward 1) X Commissioner (Ward 3) X Commissioner (Ward 4) Davis VonRueden Scheibe X Commissioner (Ward 2) X Commissioner (Ward 3) X Commissioner (At -Large) Nystrom Buck Strand Also present were city staff members John Sutter, Jason Zimmerman and Corinne Elfelt. B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Commissioner Nystom and seconded by Commissioner Buck to approve the minutes of the September 10, 2007 regular meeting. Motion carried. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consider Application 2007-08 for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval to allow outdoor storage for Reliable Property Services at 5712 Lakeland Ave N. Mr. Zimmerman summarized the staff report. Commissioner Whitenack opened the public hearing There were no comments from the public. Commissioner Whitenack closed the public hearing. Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner VonRueden to recommend to the City Council to approve Application 2007-08 for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval to allow outdoor storage for Reliable Property Services at 5712 Lakeland Ave N. Findings of Fact are as indicated in the staff report. Motion carried. 2. Consider Application 2007-09 for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a privately - owned community center at 5736 Lakeland Ave N. Mr. Zimmerman summarized the staff report. In addition, Mr. Zimmerman recommended language regarding possible noise issues that may arise as a result of this G:ACorinne\agenda.doc Page 2 of 7 community center being in a residential neighborhood. His recommendation would be to include the language of Article 645 of Crystal City Code. Commissioner Whitenack opened the public hearing There were no comments from the public. Commissioner Whitenack closed the public hearing Planning Commission discussion: Commissioner Strand questioned the need for a liquor license at this site and would they be able to have a bar at this site. Mr. Zimmerman indicated that the site as zoned would be eligible for a bar; however, the current land use issue is related to a proposed conditional use.Mr. Sutter indicated the City Clerk deals with liquor license and applicants. Commissioner Nystrom moved that in addition to the 18 conditions cited, that the recommended language regarding noise, at Mr. Zimmerman's recommendation, be added and that the hours of operation proposed by the applicant to changed to those recommended by staff, in line with the Crystal Community Center hours. Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Davis to recommend to the City Council to Application 2007-09 for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a privately -owned community center at 5736 Lakeland Ave N. Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval are as recommended by staff with the addition of the condition regarding noise as stated in City Code 645. Motion carried. 3. Consider Application 2007-10 for a Preliminary Plat of Crystal Park Station (CPRR property west of Douglas Drive). Mr. Sutter summarized the staff report. Commissioner Whitenack opened the public hearing The following were heard: Judi Kieper asked what is going on in the area. Is it going to be industrial, park? Stated she does not want more town homes and no low-income housing. Mr. Sutter responded that the area is likely to be light industrial or light commercial. It will not be parks or residential. It may continue as it has, or add more light industrial, but there would be no residential uses. Ms. Kieper questioned the "Alley" area. G:\Corinne\agenda.doc Page 3 of 7 Mr. Sutter indicated that the area does not actually have an alley; there are no public roads through the area. The area in question is a long private driveway for business uses. One building on the site will be demolished approximately April, 2008, the rest of buildings can remain and the conditional uses remain with the property. Ms. Kieper asked what would be happening with 5225 Douglas. Mr. Sutter indicated that 5225 Douglas is not part of the railroad property and is a C-2 zoned separately platted lot. However, this property may be of interest for the buyer of the railroad property in the future. Eric Holm, representing the Canadian -Pacific Railway, commented that they want to see betterment of the area. The closing is scheduled for around December 31, 2007, the buyer being Mel - O Honey owner, Curt Reiss Commissioner Whitenack closed the public hearing No further discussion by the Planning Commission. Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Schiebe to recommend to the City Council to approve Application 2007-10 for a Preliminary Plat of Crystal Park Station (CPRR property west of Douglas Drive). Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval are as indicated in the staff report. Motion carried. 4. Consider Application 2007-11 for a Zoning Ordinance text amendment in 515.33 Subd. 8 c) to allow reduction of side setbacks in the R-1 district in certain circumstances upon grant of an adjacent open space easement. Mr. Sutter summarized the staff report. Commissioner Whitenack opened the public hearing There were no comments from the public. Commissioner Whitenack closed the public hearing. There was no further Planning Commission discussion. Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Buck to recommend to the City Council to approve Application 2007-11 for a Zoning Ordinance text amendment in 515.33 Subd. 8 c) to allow reduction of side setbacks in the R-1 district in certain circumstances upon grant of an adjacent open space easement. Findings of Fact are as recommended by staff. G:\Corinne\agenda.doc Page 4 of 7 Motion carried. 5. Consider Application 2007-12 for a variance to reduce the rear (west) setback at 6305 Corvallis Ave N. Mr. Zimmerman summarized the staff report. The following were heard: Michael Tomaszenski stated he was glad to see improvements in the neighborhood and he approves of this change. Planning Commission discussion: Commissioner Davis asked what the city would be doing with the application fee since the applicant felt it was unfair that she pay when it was the city's change of regulations that caused the need for the variance. Mr. Sutter explained that this does happen approximately 1 time per year, the City Council will address this current issue and they may possibly address fees for any future issues of this sort. There is, however, no reason to change code because that would negatively impact homes built facing the short frontage on corner lots. Commissioner Scheibe assumed yard frontage is facing the street the house faces. Should we change zoning? Mr. Sutter noted that remodeling can change an address. Rather than deal with these unusual cases by changing the zoning code, looking at each on a case-by-case basis through the variance process seems to work best. Commissioner Whitenack commented that driveways and curb cuts on the less busy street is a better choice. Moved by Commissioner VonRueden and seconded by Commissioner Hester to recommend to the City Council to approve Application 2007-12 for a Variance to reduce the rear (west) setback at 6305 Corvallis Ave N. Findings of Fact and Conditions for Approval are as recommended in the staff report. D. OLD BUSINESS None discussed Motion carried. G:\Corinne\agenda.doc Page 5 of 7 E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Discuss a preliminary Planned Development concept to plat a two-family dwelling at 4908 Bernard Avenue North into separate parcels for each unit. Mr. Sutter summarized the staff report and informed the Commissioners that this is an opportunity to discuss this item among them, ask questions of the owner and staff. There should be no stating for or against. This is being discussed at the request of the property owner. Mr. Sutter introduced the owner, Charles McColgan. Commissioner Strand asked what is involved in creating an association. Mr. Sutter stated that it is a legal document to be recorded with the deed. This document runs forever with the property. Commissioner Strand questioned if the association is like a 3rd entity? Mr. Sutter indicated that is true. Commissioner Hester asked for further information about the zero lot line. Mr. Sutter explained that in the mid 1980's in many areas, including Angeline Avenue had zero lot lines — on Angeline the town homes have a lot line down the middle of the town homes. As they are, you deal with each owner although you only have one roof and siding that runs from one owner to another. Commissioner Hester asked if other duplexes or twin homes in Crystal were originally built and sold to one owner or two. Mr. Sutter explained that most in Crystal are on a single parcel therefore they have one owner, i.e. 3200 block of Nevada. Duplexes on a single parcel are only conveyable together. Commissioner Hester asked if the subject property might cause other property owners to want to split their properties? Mr. Sutter said it has actually been suggested that twin homes be done this way, with an association. Commissioner Davis asked the owner's thinking on this. Charles McColgan (owner) also owns a duplex on one lot in Brooklyn Park — that city has encouraged the move toward zero lot lines. He agrees that there are a lot more hoops to have an association but it still makes more sense to him. With the association, this 3rd entity supervises. Maintenance and exterior maintenance are taken care of by the association. He has personally seen examples in Brooklyn Park of the benefits, more expense but a better choice. Commissioner Davis commented that an association may work well for 15 units, would it be harder with just two units? G:\Corinne\agenda.doc Page 6 of 7 Mr. McColgan agreed that it will be more difficult but you would have to work as neighbors. Owner will know up front about the association as the association documents will be drawn up prior to the sale. Commissioner Strand questioned the difficulties that may come up when each owner has a 50% vote. Mr. McColgan stated the governing document is the declarant document and maintains the overall veto power and can be built into the governing document. Mr. Sutter commented on 15-20 years into the future the benefits of this type of arrangement when maintenance is needed. The city would be able to go after the association, it really forces owners to work together or they could go to arbitration or mediation Commissioner Strand commented on this being an interesting concept. Commissioner Whitenack asked if each unit has property insurance individually. Mr. McColgan indicated that the association will carry general liability insurance for the grounds and the homeowners would have their own hazard insurance. Board members for the association would be able to adjust liability insurance amounts as mortgages change. Commissioner Nystrom asked who determines the value of each property. Mr. McColgan stated the real estate appraiser would evaluate the property. There is a dramatic value difference between a planned twin home on separate parcels and a duplex on one parcel. Mr. Sutter asked the Planning Commission if there are any questions or concerns that you would like staff to research; let us know before a formal application is turned in. Commissioner Whitenack asked about criteria for these type units — can you separate properties that do not have a firewall. Mr. Sutter indicated there are different building codes for town homes. If there is no firewall there is no possibility of making a split. Commissioner Whitenack asked if we would need to establish criteria for future applications. Mr. Sutter indicated that we would consider this to be sort of a template for the future. Commissioner Hester appreciated the opportunity to discuss matters without having to make a decision. Commissioner Davis asked if association documents are a part of the application process. Mr. Sutter stated that they would be requested with the application. G:ACorinne\agenda.doc F. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Quarterly Development Status Report was presented to the Commission 2. City Council actions on recent Planning Commission items. 3. Staffs preview of likely agenda items for November 12, 2007 meeting. G. OPEN FORUM There were no comments. H. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Davis and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Page 7 of 7 Motion carried. G:ACorinne\agenda.doc M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 8, 2007 TO: Planning Commission (November 13th meeting) S FROM: John Sutter, City Planner/Assistant Community Development Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Application 2007-13 for a Variance to reduce the south setback at 3550 Hampshire Avenue North A. BACKGROUND The home on the subject property was constructed in 1964 in accordance with the minimum setbacks governing the property at that time, which were: ■ North (side street) lot line: 10 feet ■ South (side) lot line: 5 feet ■ East (rear) lot line: 25% of lot depth, in this case, 22.5 feet ■ West (front) lot line: 30 feet Since that time, the yard definitions have changed so that the minimum setbacks are currently as follows: ■ North (front) lot line: 30 feet ■ South (rear) lot line: 30 feet 12.5 feet* ■ East (side) lot line: 5 feet ■ West (side street) lot line: 10 feet for the house, 20 feet for the garage * In 1993, the City Council granted a variance to reduce the south setback for the subject property from 30 feet to 12.5 feet. The house and attached garage are in compliance with the 12.5 foot setback variance approved by the City Council in 1993. However, there is an unlawful storage addition located on the south side of the garage, filling all but approximately 2 feet of the already-varianced 12.5 foot setback. It also encroaches into a 5 foot platted utility and drainage easement along the south lot line. The storage addition was built unlawfully, without permits, some time prior to 1993. The variance (from 30 to 12.5 feet) was requested by the property owner so he could add on to the back (east side) of the attached garage. The city approved the variance; however, the owner did not build the approved addition on the east side of the garage and instead kept the unlawful storage addition on the south side of the garage. It is unknown why the Building Official at the time did not take enforcement action for removal of the unlawful storage addition. What is known is (1) that the Council made a conscious decision to not grant a big enough variance to `legalize' the unlawful storage addition; and (2) even if they had done so, the -� easement was not vacated so the structure is also unlawful for that reason. VARIANCE - SETBACK - 3550 HAMPSHIRE PAGE 1 OF 4 In 2003, current staff noted the continued presence of the unlawful storage addition during an inspection for a retaining wall. In summer 2007, upon reviewing the property owner's building permit application for a deck on the east side of the house, current staff sent an enforcement letter to the property owner directing him to remove the unlawful storage addition and advising him that the deck permit could not be issued because the presence of the unlawful storage addition makes the house a nonconforming structure. The property owner has applied for a variance to reduce the south setback from 12.5 feet to 2 feet. If approved, the requested variance would reduce the south setback to match the south edge of the storage addition, and also allow a building permit to be issued for the deck because the house would no longer be a nonconforming structure. However, it would not cure the problem posed by the fact that the storage addition encroaches approximately 3 feet into the platted utility & drainage easement. Notice of the November 13, 2007 public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property on October 31, 2007 with an updated version (changing the meeting date from the 12th to the 13th due to the Veterans Day holiday) mailed on November 2, 2007. The following Exhibits are attached: A. 2006 aerial photos showing the property B. 1963 plat of the property (Lot 1, Block 1, Franz Addition) C. 1993 variance materials D. Site plan showing what was approved by the 1993 variance E. Site plan showing what exists today F. Current setbacks drawn on present-day site plan G. Setbacks requested by property owner drawn on present-day site plan H. Setbacks recommended by staff drawn on present-day site plan I. 2003 correction notice from Building Official identifying the unlawful storage addition J. 2007 Administrative Notice from Building Official ordering removal of the unlawful storage addition K. Application materials submitted by the property owner B. STAFF COMMENTS In order for a variance to be granted, state law and city code require that all three of the following criteria be met: ■ The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used as required by the code. ■ The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the property owner. ■ The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. VARIANCE - SETBACK - 3550 HAMPSHIRE PAGE 2 OF 4 In addition, state law and city code specifically state that economic considerations alone do not constitute an undue hardship if a reasonable use for the property exists under - the code. Notwithstanding the length of time that the storage addition has been allowed to remain, it is and always has been an unlawful structure. There is no indication in the record that the City Council's intent in 1993 was to allow it to remain; but even if that was their intent, then they would have had to (1) approve a variance reducing the setback to 2 feet not 12.5, and (2) vacate the utility & drainage easement. The 1993 action did neither of those things. Staff disagrees with the property owner's argument that there is an undue hardship necessitating his requested variance. The topography and easements related to Bassett Creek have nothing to do with his need for storage space because such space could be easily accommodated in compliance with the existing setbacks, for example, by building the garage addition he had proposed in 1993. Furthermore, the requested 2 foot setback would be extraordinarily small; for decades our minimum side setbacks have been 5 feet which is hardly an excessive requirement. Staff agrees that there is an undue hardship associated with this property, but only in the same manner as exists on other corner lots with side -loaded houses. For this reason, we would recommend approval of a variance to the extent necessary to alleviate that hardship, meaning further reducing the south setback from 12.5 feet to 5 feet provided that the west setback is increased to 30 feet. This would apply the south and west setbacks that were in effect when the house was built, and would have the added benefit of respecting the platted 5' drainage and utility easement. C. RECOMMENDATION 1. Deny the requested variance from 515.33 Subd. 8 b) to reduce the south setback from 12.5 feet to 2 feet Suggested findings of fact are as follows: Denial of the requested variance would not constitute an undue hardship in this particular case. None of the three required criteria for undue hardship are met in this case. Specifically.- The pecifically: The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used as required by this Zoning Code. The 1993 variance approved by the City Council allowed construction of an addition on the east side of the garage which would have been even larger than the existing unlawful storage addition on the south side of the garage. Reasonable use of the property does not require reduction of the south setback from 12.5 feet to 2 feet as requested by the property owner. 2. The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. After approval of the 1993 variance, the property could have constructed a storage addition on the east side of the garage that would have VARIANCE - SETBACK - 3550 HAMPSHIRE PAGE 3 OF 4 been equal to or larger than the existing unlawful storage addition on the south side of the garage. The property owner chose not to do so. 3. The variance, if granted, would alter the essential character of the locality. The requested 2 foot south setback is extremely small, even when compared to the standard 5 foot side setback that has been required in the R-1 zoning district for decades and pre -dating construction of the house in 1964. 2. Approve a variance from 515.33 Subd. 8 b) to reduce the south setback from 12.5 feet to 5 feet provided that the west setback is increased to 30 feet, thus bringing the south and west setbacks into line with what was in effect when the house was built in 1964. Suggested findings of fact are as follows: Denial of the requested variance would constitute an undue hardship in this particular case because all of the three required criteria are met. Specifically: 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used as required by this Zoning Code. Reasonable use of the property includes allowing structures that comply with the 5 foot south setback in effect at the time the house was built in 1964 to compensate for changes to the lot line definitions used in the zoning code over time. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property. It is unusual for changes in lot line definitions over time to make a structure non -conforming, although it is not uncommon on corner lots with side -loaded houses like the subject property. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; provided that the north setback is increased to what was required when the house was built in 1964. Separate Planning Commission action on each item above is requested. For each item, findings of fact addressing whether or not the three variance criteria are met should be included in the motion. The Planning Commission may choose to use staff's recommended findings of fact by reference in the motion. VARIANCE - SETBACK - 3550 HAMPSHIRE PAGE 4OF4 Hennepin County Property Map Print Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2007 The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed --1 land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The Information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Vennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. I _ 6739 6705 -670 6625 6b 7. 66fi°_, 64� Z 360 65 7 65179 G50 -s 6425 = ? f -= 6766 67 0 6702 6626 . r668 660 363:= 3630 65 i8 6510 6502 6126 6#fR I Selected Parcel Data Parcel ID: 20-118-21-11-0042 Owner Name: ALLEN 3 FRANZ ETAL 1, I E Parcel Address: 3550 HAMPSHIRE AVE N , CRYSTAL, MN 55427 f Property Type: RESIDENTIAL Homestead: HOMESTEAD Area (sgft): 11887 Area (acres): 0.27 A -T -B: TORRENS Market Total: $221,000.00 Tax Total: $2,990.98 Date Printed: 10/24/2007 10:30:54 AM Current Parcel Date: 10/10/2007 Sale Price: $0.00 Sale Date: / Sale Code: AC 0 http://gis. co. hennepin.mn. us/HCPropertyMap/Locator. aspx?PID=2011821110042 Page I of 1 T N A, 10/24/2007 Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2007 The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Selected Parcel Data Parcel ID: 20-118-21-11-0042 Owner Name: ALLEN ] FRANZ ETAL Parcel Address: 3550 HAMPSHIRE AVE N , CRYSTAL, MN 55427 Property Type: RESIDENTIAL Homestead: HOMESTEAD Area (sgft): 11887 Area (acres): 0.27 A -T -B: TORRENS Market Total. $221,000.00 Tax Total: $2,990.98 Date Printed: 10/10/2007 11:50:20 AM Current Parcel Date: 10/10/2007 Sale Price: $0.00 Sale Date: / Sale Code: T N V http://gis.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx?PID=0702924220027 10/10/2007 u w Casw¢// Engm-e )�9 Co. C— FRA)VZ AC)D/T/ON HENIJEfw At COuNTYy, M//JNESOTA ".4 acne! r Iren Menanan� 6¢er.,y+ ber<d en etsumed oo.�an Thou p/ me<f PP�ev¢d end oecep/<d bf, f/e C Iy C une,f o% G'4✓ rqt M.nnaro /a, e/ a i 9 Tor 1 rh<ce � ha/d rA;r d Y �— /gLS , A4 C,il /, YJTq L, Minncro/a by �++�✓ lr Mey.or rJ+r o/ N s pbf o b Hm how+-+eb..r f /ht b/oc/N+scr,:s rmcv n fhr�rnv/y H'C/eb � �oro✓M. ,W ob/ mnerro.. .sr mmo4 /b o>er /nn //m/ /hr rr�ro/ � mpf `y sow e w fr nr , mow fy s Yan ffsrwxpr � nfy, Mnax ,b Eng;naers 4 Eond Suive yar5 Kwow A, Mev By THere Paereur!t: Th � rl/Jw I floes� and ✓'9;nia 0, iron), //uabex'and w:,k fea woos, and Inver/err Syndca/e f e rr-,co Inc. M;nncte/a Co Poro/Jan A or/yayea L i G Bixk L arm<,v Dote gcoes NewNe a.v Govvr ✓, M,vverora a erday /o A co.d:d plat 1ti reej !i a ed of re<ard;n !b1 affc< of /ha fleyir/<. at o=<dr, c wn/y of sf /c o% Minnua/o. H w c ut<d me re a fo b< r< y<d aid ob//der F eNz gcar�,'r,o,v, odd he.<6yav„„k end dedc<f % rkvub/,c� pubdr urc forau<. lh¢ �/,by endd...,�¢9< aere�<nf e: r,�wn a, ,rs� ensued p/ / rn w:lne.r wnar<aJ .d q/i<n I F � e d v.;y;n:a O, Fro J, narba„d ..d w.fe naa< n<r<unh se/ !h<J/ sands and:<e/ /his_ day e� _ Jg_, q a, and .so.d Inv<sfo s o: vsro ; .sd 5 rvices, IrK� Minne>od> Copo lion Jwt c orad %/lase p/a <n/r r b srgr+ed by �/ piopei Sr Pagse,v« of 5�4,veo <nJ ✓'r9;nw a Fra j INVESTOgS SINO/CATE Or AWPIC4•ING. ad FC. /lets A e✓ �re Flier. .3,bJr o .-ore% Cmo r N .Mte.:r n'aa mr a m.'ay p.A/ w.fnn arW rbi .real <e«+/y ✓',y "n>i �,.;6.;-i a,//�b` -`Dai-. �<d rto�"/$'ey .,K .tid in�r ez ice: nw a '��•d ate+ Mu .>rron rrpie-s J/bfr feM..riesofe ro r f N fX �df s ,so i •%-.- -.r. f,y a efe ,..,fb.,, aMd v..twd ru.,/y Air ��/ ✓.� O<rJdeo/®nd qs>Jr % � r( Invt�rr'icerr /p S M' e� f .y„rn/ _ rnr .ti er a/ .r,>,d � a��f,'w:/y f err.i •�6a� %"� d / s• o� .drFc int d IDA P.Y /lwmjr � domed oFsn� c f. imtjed o� ' >f / � be ins /.ar ,cv on n amiss P'rrr� • 'e'binararb crr,/y moi . snows yed ord ,o/of/rd nxr ,o o..i drec.>wd ,., /b.> ,wof Frac Nz of Fvi �sW � p r 'br i f / onap• Wtimn/s o/ /oo/; /ho/ fh< nh fw roWnev W.ywr oe�,ob� loss � %rriiy sad g� 'r',o�d'�""ifnoi ��.fr 'fie � fo.�y�of .wNcxeoA; �r 6W�r eni�/en/r xos .r,.esrrAe�f e.M s..w++ fo. Gr.6rr irve�, fhs�dl n/ Q � •.'{_ /KJ,AO .ry I I I eo—ads 451 E. .549'dd. I n I a` nlp//yet' m I N � N I � • • gao:o,o'�-. `Dir-'- —•('— — — �_ I I NH'NQ9ly'' 'vY I `I C— FRA)VZ AC)D/T/ON HENIJEfw At COuNTYy, M//JNESOTA ".4 acne! r Iren Menanan� 6¢er.,y+ ber<d en etsumed oo.�an Thou p/ me<f PP�ev¢d end oecep/<d bf, f/e C Iy C une,f o% G'4✓ rqt M.nnaro /a, e/ a i 9 Tor 1 rh<ce � ha/d rA;r d Y �— /gLS , A4 C,il /, YJTq L, Minncro/a by �++�✓ lr Mey.or rJ+r o/ N s pbf o b Hm how+-+eb..r f /ht b/oc/N+scr,:s rmcv n fhr�rnv/y H'C/eb � �oro✓M. ,W ob/ mnerro.. .sr mmo4 /b o>er /nn //m/ /hr rr�ro/ � mpf `y sow e w fr nr , mow fy s Yan ffsrwxpr � nfy, Mnax ,b Eng;naers 4 Eond Suive yar5 Kwow A, Mev By THere Paereur!t: Th � rl/Jw I floes� and ✓'9;nia 0, iron), //uabex'and w:,k fea woos, and Inver/err Syndca/e f e rr-,co Inc. M;nncte/a Co Poro/Jan A or/yayea L i G Bixk L arm<,v Dote gcoes NewNe a.v Govvr ✓, M,vverora a erday /o A co.d:d plat 1ti reej !i a ed of re<ard;n !b1 affc< of /ha fleyir/<. at o=<dr, c wn/y of sf /c o% Minnua/o. H w c ut<d me re a fo b< r< y<d aid ob//der F eNz gcar�,'r,o,v, odd he.<6yav„„k end dedc<f % rkvub/,c� pubdr urc forau<. lh¢ �/,by endd...,�¢9< aere�<nf e: r,�wn a, ,rs� ensued p/ / rn w:lne.r wnar<aJ .d q/i<n I F � e d v.;y;n:a O, Fro J, narba„d ..d w.fe naa< n<r<unh se/ !h<J/ sands and:<e/ /his_ day e� _ Jg_, q a, and .so.d Inv<sfo s o: vsro ; .sd 5 rvices, IrK� Minne>od> Copo lion Jwt c orad %/lase p/a <n/r r b srgr+ed by �/ piopei Sr Pagse,v« of 5�4,veo <nJ ✓'r9;nw a Fra j INVESTOgS SINO/CATE Or AWPIC4•ING. ad FC. /lets A e✓ �re Flier. .3,bJr o .-ore% Cmo r N .Mte.:r n'aa mr a m.'ay p.A/ w.fnn arW rbi .real <e«+/y ✓',y "n>i �,.;6.;-i a,//�b` -`Dai-. �<d rto�"/$'ey .,K .tid in�r ez ice: nw a '��•d ate+ Mu .>rron rrpie-s J/bfr feM..riesofe ro r f N fX �df s ,so i •%-.- -.r. f,y a efe ,..,fb.,, aMd v..twd ru.,/y Air ��/ ✓.� O<rJdeo/®nd qs>Jr % � r( Invt�rr'icerr /p S M' e� f .y„rn/ _ rnr .ti er a/ .r,>,d � a��f,'w:/y f err.i •�6a� %"� d / s• o� .drFc int d IDA P.Y /lwmjr � domed oFsn� c f. imtjed o� ' >f / � be ins /.ar ,cv on n amiss P'rrr� • 'e'binararb crr,/y moi . snows yed ord ,o/of/rd nxr ,o o..i drec.>wd ,., /b.> ,wof Frac Nz of Fvi �sW � p r 'br i f / onap• Wtimn/s o/ /oo/; /ho/ fh< nh fw roWnev W.ywr oe�,ob� loss � %rriiy sad g� 'r',o�d'�""ifnoi ��.fr 'fie � fo.�y�of .wNcxeoA; �r 6W�r eni�/en/r xos .r,.esrrAe�f e.M s..w++ fo. Gr.6rr irve�, fhs�dl n/ Q � •.'{_ /KJ,AO .ry S co Xz / SO. o / ,B Qor�.r9s boSdd on a S5 441V a,51 C/12 1'6P77 k; G 8 9. 8 4 Iain 89.8! M¢os• m .S a9`4zp 45 7Z' 33.o f \ v, Qos,�nQn 45 ShowA :' `O EasQ�enXr vi o 90• a4 .yQas. �` s IIva a9 S co Xz / SO. o / ,B Qor�.r9s boSdd on a S5 441V a,51 C/12 1'6P77 k; G y r V A L J 1' H L No. 4141 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH CRYSTAL, MN 55422 Date:�V, Phone: 537-8421 y APPEAL FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE Street Location of Property: 3 55o )Shn n�-tAve- brAh N�1 Legal Description of Property: Lb � 1 - j� 0� 1 r n Count � � adz, Ad ��ton Property Identification'Number: Applicant: '�1��'h J, �� (P int Name) Owner: 55p M m}05h)re Le. �ib��h ,�1�5%c¢ I 33.51.501 (Address' 5550 (Print Name) �Q (Address) Z. (Phone No.) (Phone No.) REQUEST:J A plicant requests a variance on the above-described property from Section 5-1`x. 13 �y_o �a of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, which requires Wq (,{�ou l a � o en � (Zn °�' 1 a b r �x 15 i Abu )IL0 Q +�Lu) a rq e Q - bock zs' 5�s n -�-a�, UQ State exactly what is intended to be done on, or with the property which does not conform with the Zoning Ordinance. A plot plan drawn to scale showing the proposal must be sub- mitted with the application. Explain in detail wherein your case conforms to the following requirements: 1. That the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships (other than economic) inconsistent with its general purpose and intent. e� 2. 0 *1' i � E 15 - - -PablReel,o the prop r�tye in I volved or to the intended use or development of the property that do not apply gener- ally to other property in the same zone or neighborhood. laLC UL Liliuri-ous zo zne property or improvement in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located. pl_)l t tW__) I )U Ul 1 K. NOTE: The Planning Commission is required to make a written findings of fact from the showing applicant makes that all three of the above -enumerated conditions exist and in addition thereto must find that the granting of such variance will not be contrary to the )bjectives of the Comprehensive Plan. -1 THIS PROPERTY IS: (Applant' S�atu TORRENS / ABSTRACT (Circle one) (Owne s Signature)_ KI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON REQUEST FOR VARIANCE IN REAR YARD SETBACK Application #92-7 City of Crystal, MN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Crystal, serving as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, will meet on Monday, January 11, 1993, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the Crystal Municipal Building, 4141 Douglas Drive, in said City, to consider a variance of 17.5' in the required 30 ft. rear yard setback (Section 515.13, Subd. 4 a) for a 22' x 25' addition to the back of the existing garage at 3550 Hampshire Ave. N., P.I.D. #20-118-21-11-0042. The proposed variance application has been submitted by Allen J. Franz, 3550 Hampshire Ave. N. Persons desiring to be.heard on this matter may'do so at this time. JANE A. ELSEN SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 3, 1992 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Bill Barber, Building Inspecto RE: 3550 Hampshire Ave. N. Set Public Hearing DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW: I have received a request for a variance to build a 221x25' addition to the back of the existing. The current attached garage currently is located in the 30 foot rear yard setback which makes this an existing non -conforming use. I'm requesting that you set the public hearing for January 11, 1993 to hear this request. I will give you more detail in my follow-up before the meeting. Should you have any questions, please contact me. ko M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 6, 1993 TO: Planning commission FROM: Bill Barber, Building Inspecto�zw RE: 3550 Hampshire Ave. N. Rear Yard Setback Variance Request DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW: abA I have received a request for a rear yard setback variance from Mr. & Mrs. Allen Franz. The proposal is to build a 221x 25' addition to the east side of the existing garage. The existing attached garage currently encroaches approximately 17.5 feet into the rear yard setback. This was built in 1963 and I have not been able to find any evidence of a variance being granted at that time. However, a building permit was issued with these setbacks noted. The addition is proposed to house additional vehicles that are currently outside and are being restored. -The addition as proposed will not encroach any further towards the rear property line than the existing garage. It will.be approximately 9' from the east property line. I am recommending approval of this request as there is no other location to add on. As proposed, the addition will not be detrimental to this property or any adjoining properties. This will also help to eliminate the exterior storage which has become an issue relative to zoning. Should you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. ko ao CfV January 12, 1993 Allan & Virginia Franz 3550 Hampshire Avenue North Crystal, MN 55427 RE: Variance Request Dear Mr. & Mrs. Franz: Your request for a variance was before the Planning Commission last night. After reviewing the data available and the lot situation, they did recommend to the City Council to vary the rear yard setback for the 22' x 25' addition to the garage. After discussing the request, it was recommended for approval subject to the roof structure attached to the south side of the garage and resting on the fence be removed. I pointed out that this roofed area is classified as a structure and no permit was issued. This recommendation will go to the City Council on January 19, 1993. It is imperative that you be present. Requests such as these need the applicant present to answer any questions they have of you. Should you have any questions, please give me a call at 537-8421. Sincerely, William D. Barber Building Official WDB : j t M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 12, 1993 TO: Jerry Dulgar, City Manager FROM: Bill Barber, Building Inspect 4 RE: 3550 Hampshire Avenue North Rear Yard Setback Variance Request DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW: I have received a request for a rear yard setback variance from Mr. & Mrs. Allen Franz. The proposal is to build a 22' x 25' addition to the east side of the existing garage. The existing attached garage currently encroaches approximately 17.5 feet into the rear yard setback. This was built in 1963 and I have not been able to find any evidence of a variance being granted at that time. However, a building permit was issued with these setbacks noted. The addition is proposed to house additional vehicles that are currently outside and are being restored. The addition as proposed will not encroach any further towards the rear property line than the existing garage. It will be - approximately 9' from the east property line. I am recommending approval of this request subject to the roof structure on the south side of the garage being removed. The roofed area extends over an easement and is classified as a structure as it is attached to the garage. This was built.without permits. The Planning Commission had this request before then on January 11 and has recommended to the City Council to approve the request subject to the roof structure being removed. They felt that there was a definite hardship in this situation because of the large easement in their front yard area along 36th Avenue North. Hopefully, the applicant will be present at the Council meeting. Should you have any questions of me, please contact me. WDB : j t January 19, 1993 page 1020 change the "salaries" to "compensation"; add "/Highway 100" to 36th Avenue in the last 2 paragraphs of the minutes. Motion Carried. The City Council considered the following items on the Consent Agenda: 1. Consideration of approval of the list of license applications as submitted by the City Clerk to the City Council, a list of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. Consideration of authorization for the Fire Department to utilize donated funds to purchase_ ice rescue equipment, station furniture, training room furniture, office chairs and fire cord reels. Moved by Councilmember Herbes and seconded by Councilmember Joselyn to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion -Carried. Due to the.Public Hearing being advertised for 7:30 p.m., the Mayor moved to the Regular Agenda. The City Council considered'the following items on the Regular Agenda. 1. The City. Council considered the applications for appointment to the Human Rights Commission from Teresa.. Schurz, 3613 Welcome Avenue North, and Elizabeth -Raymond, 4803 Lakeland Avenue North, for unexpired terms expiring December 31, 1993. Mayor Meintsma announced that Elizabeth Raymond was unable'to attend the meeting due to_an illness in her family. Moved by Councilmember Moravec and seconded by Councilmember. Krueger to appoint Teresa Schurz, 3613 Welcome Avenue North, to the Human Rights Commission for an unexpired term expiring December 31, -1993. Motion Carried. 2. The City Council considered a variance to the rear yard setback at 3550'Hampshire Avenue North to build a 22' x 25' .,garage addition as requested by Allan Franz. Moved by Councilmember Langsdorf and seconded by Councilmember, Moravec to grant the authorization pursuant to Section 515.56 of the Crystal City Code to vary or modify the strict application of Section 515.23, Subdivision 4 a) to grant a. variance of 17.51 in the required 30' rear yard setback for constructing a 22' x 25' addition to the existing garage which will expand the non -conforming use at 3550 Hampshire Avenue North. Motion Carried. Vx9coft, 7708 Lakeland Ave. (Brooklyn Park), P. O. Osseo, Minn. CASWELL ENGINEERING CO. Registered Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY - For— At /_ / d �!?A Nz Scale / ✓= 3 0 ' O*DaAO 12 3 1 ran L FR•4+Vz Qco�r�oe�! Ncnn¢/�in t!o✓niy J MiiDo¢Sv �o No.- ... qo. i& .-. . Phone HA. S-2181 { 3� r� ,4 ✓ �. N; /& ' 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land described above. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments, if any. As surveyed by me this_g6-2.day of 0 t File No. Book_ \ A CASWELL EINEERING CO. by Minnesota Registration No.___",gS�___. _ �! 0 7708 Lakeland Aye. (Brooklyn Park), P. O. Osseo, Minn. Phone HA. 5-2181 CASWELL ENGINEERING COO Registered Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY For QLL�N rJ. /:?A VZ _ Scale 017ana Las 1 ro.. Z, F,7A,vz //tnn¢pin �o.in �, /yineQSa LQ �(o Ts/ 4 v r-. No, I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land described above. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments, if any. As surveyed by me this r'y "day of .��ortit 191c3_. CASWELL E�j �INE ERING CO. File No. 1S77 Book_ Page_—___. Minnesota Registration `\ L A - •Smn:fs.y S:.rarlI JdT an i� � .�•-'a lrJ \ M 0 ti Ay �1 X �a I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land described above. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments, if any. As surveyed by me this r'y "day of .��ortit 191c3_. CASWELL E�j �INE ERING CO. File No. 1S77 Book_ Page_—___. Minnesota Registration `\ L A 770$ Lakeland Ave. (Brooklyn Park), P. O. Osseo, Minn. C ASWELL ENGINEERING COO Registered Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FoR A A/ Z Scale ///'=30' O (�Q AOI¢3 Iron h N Phone HA. 5-2181 FRAAJZ A, Ga -/7-.1 Al • I O y h 4—. ;.7 T) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representwion of a survey of the boundaries of the land described above. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments, if any. As surveyed by me this g r� "day of 19 C-3. i File No. /597- Book_ Page— —_--• �r� CASWELL EtPINEERING CO. M;nnoceta Reaistration No.___�gs�—.._.___._•� 7708 Lakeland Ave. (Brooklyn Park), P. O. Osseo, Minn. CAS"w"'WELL ENGINEERING Registered Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Scale 1'-30 L o / /, /' FR,a,vz A. ooiroA/ Ntnnapin Co..,, �, M;.roQsa 1a I � _ Coo Phone HA. 5-2181 2 s�. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land described above. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments, if any. As surveyed by me this g r"y day of 191x3 . CASWELL E�PINEERING CO. o% Fiie No.11r?7 Book_ Page— _—_—. Minnesota Registration No.___-- - — �' 7708 Lakeland Ave. (Brooklyn Park), P. 0. Osseo, Minn. Phone HA. 5.2181 CAS ELL ENGINEERING- COO Registered Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Scale Q•[�¢g0r¢ 3 1 ran Zo/ /'iota /, FT�Aaz QOO/T1Q�/ Ncnn¢�in Co✓n �� sJi„v¢fC �a PM -_p �D I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representoiion of a survey of the boundaries of the land described above. It does not purport to show improvements or encroachments, if any. As surveyed by me this 'e .day of "I 1.Z_ 19113_. File No.11`37 Boak_ Page— ----- CASWELL EiINEERING CO. O � M�nneseta Reaistrat�on No.___ � qs� —.._. __—_--- I—N 4141 Douglas Drive North * Crystal, MN 55422 Correction Notice �W jA Q t II Property Address During today's inspection I found the following violations. Please call 531-1148 for a reinspection after they have been corrected. �j 17 VI t7 I Odn Date: —Signature: October 1, 2007 BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55422 phone: 763-531-1000 fax: 763-531-1188 internet: Www.ci.crystal.mn.us ALLEN J FRANZ 3550 HAMPSHIRE AVE N CRYSTAL MN 55427 RE: 3550 Hampshire Av. N. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE The Crystal City Council has adopted certain municipal ordinances in an effort to maintain and improve healthy communities in the city. The Community Development Department directs this effort by responding to city code concerns in our neighborhoods. This Administrative Notice is the first step of the city's Administrative Enforcement Program that is intended to be an effective and informal procedure for achieving compliance with city ordinances. During a recent inspection, the following violation(s) of city code were cited: VIOLATION: CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT A BUILDING PERMIT The City of Crystal's Building Code requires an owner or authorized agent who intends to construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, demolish, or change the occupancy of a building or structure, or cause any such work to be done, to first make application to the building official and obtain the required permit (City Code 400.07) It is. unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to erect, construct, alter, extend, repair, move, remove, demolish, or occupy any building, structure, or equipment regulated by the code, or cause any of those actions, in conflict with or in violation of the code (HSBC 1300.0140). CORRECTION REQUIRED: REMOVE THE UNLAWFUL STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE REQUIRED SOUTH YARD SETBACK. COMPLIANCE DATE: October 11, 2007 You are provided 10 calendar days, from the date of this letter, to correct the violation(s). If the violation has not been corrected within the 10 -day period, fines of not less than $30.00 nor more than $350.00 will be issued. Call 763-531-1141 if you have any questions or if for any reason you are unable to complete the work by the compliance date. City of Crystal Building Safety & Inspections Division 40, - Jack Molin Building Official BUILDING SAFETY — Serving to help keep Crystal a safe place to live and work mt. ,� 2007 Appeal for Variance on Deck and Shed On the property of Allen J. Franz 3550 Hampshire Avenue North Crystal, MN 55427 763-533-5259, home 612-710-4177, cell Attachments/Enclosures 1. Head Letter 2. Application for special land use action 3. Site Plan for deck and shed 4. Administrative Notice , mN,,PA *1 �! 1� 5. Plans for new deck 6. Photos 7. 1992 Variance --> mom. -fm� a14* 8. 1977 Deck Permit 9. Bassett Creek Easements 10. Petition Signatures Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 Page 1 of 2 From: Allen J. Franz, Homeowner of: 3550 Hampshire Avenue North Crystal, MN 55427 763-533-5259 home, 612-710-4177 cell To: Jack Molin, Building Official, City of Crystal, Building Safety & Inspections Division, Ann Norris, City Manager, Planning Commission, and Council Members City of Crystal, Building Safety Division 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55422 463-531-1000 Dear Jack Molin and Ann Norris, I have lived here in Crystal, MN for 47 years on the corner of 36"` Avenue North and Hampshire Avenue North. My wife and I started out in a small one bedroom home on this corner in 1960. Then in 1963 we built our current home next to the small one bedroom home and our new address remained the same; 3550 Hampshire Avenue North. Because the back yard of the new home sloped and was steeper toward the creek, I built a retaining wall with railroad timbers and had to do that two times due to the work that was done with the culvert that were being replaced. Eventually the railroad ties began to deteriorate so I applied for a permit to— rebuild/replace orebuild/replace the retaining wall out of Diamond Pro Blocks which I have now finished. This project of rebuilding with Blocks took a few years because I was doing the work myself and I became ill with Staph Infection in my left knee but now have recovered from that illness. About 30 years ago I built a deck on the back of our home. I took the deck off about 3 years ago because it was actually sinking. My footings were 4 feet deep but the ground was "fill" at one time so I had it tested this summer and now I know that I have to go 6' on 2 holes and 8' on the third footing. I came into the offices at the City of Crystal this past summer, 2007 to talk about a permit to rebuild/replace the old deck. The above information gives you a quick background of the retaining walls and deck built on our property and home. Now I would like to take you back in time to November of 1992. In November of 1992 I asked to lengthen my garage 25' and a variance was granted to proceed. However, I did not follow through with that work because of the cost and felt that it wouldn't add value to our home. We do have a shed on the south end of our garage that was put on about 30 years ago. We recentl- received notice that the shed must be removed by October 11, 2007. I received the letter on October 2, 2007. Eic. k:t Tuesday, October 9, 2007 Page 2 of 2 ,Back when we applied for the lengthening of our garage, the shed was already built on the south side of :he garage. When we asked for a variance to lengthen the garage in November of 1992, it was noted by Bill Barber, the Building Inspector, on January 12'h, 1963 recommending that the roof structure on the south side of the garage to be removed. The variance went all the way to the Planning Commission and the City Council and they did not make mention that the roof structure needed to be removed. The shed has been there for over 30 years and the city has let it stand. Now that I want to replace/rebuild my deck, I am told that the shed must come down. I do not think the shed and the deck are related to each other, being that the deck was there for about 27 years. The deck was on the back of the house that goes out from sliding glass doors from the kitchen area. There is about a 5 foot drop out the sliding glass doors. A new deck will add value to the home and enhance the neighborhood. Also, all of my neighbors are accepting of the shed. It is used for garden supplies, fireplace wood, race car parts, deck furniture, and the shed looks very nice and has pleasant visual curbside appeal. I have given easement two times for culverts that ran through my property. Back when the easements were given, I was told by the City Engineer that the grass would be cut on both sides of the creek and kept neat - that only happened two times and that was disappointing, but I have never complained to the city about it. The 2 easements I gave stopped the flooding of my neighbors basements on the north side of 36'h Avenue North. So, my approach on the shed would be a trade-off for what I gave up on land. The term "undue hardship" is that I gave 2 different easements to the City and I feel I should be able to keep my shed and be able to rebuild my deck back on the house which is 36 sq ft less in size than the previous deck. These two things will not alter the essential character of the locality. So, now I am applying for a variance for my deck, which I don't think is necessary, and also for a variance for my shed. I need longer than October l lth, 2007 so I can go to the Planning Commission and the City Council. Respectfully Submitted, Allen J. Franz, Homeowner of: 3550 Hampshire Avenue North Crystal, MN 55427 763-533-5259 home 612-710-4177 cell Enclosures: Please See Attachments Cxe k3 ®■ 7705 Lakeland Ave. (Brooklyn Park), P. 0.. Osseo, Minn. CICASMVELL Co. Registered Professional Engineers and Land Suryeyors CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY, For_ /? A Ai Scale�_v a�¢q0 F¢ 3 Iron Phone HA. 5-2181 _ •.s mnir�.n .y fga.¢r. �RAA/i= AooiTioAl •�cnngpin �o✓n�y�/Eii�saela�a f� o a r� p c I hereby certify that this is' a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land described above. It does not purport 4o show improvements or encroachments, if any. As surveyed, by me this 9 7W 191�i. day of CASWELL EtPINEERING CO. by File No, /1 ?7 Book_ Foge_ _ Minnesota Registration A 3 �o M,it yos+- 2,Y\ 'L WV2 I�Ip� C>P� it t 06-18-'07 08;55 FROM-NORTHEEN TECH, INC. 763-323-4739 T-085 P002/005 F-117 NoRTHERNrwwaoain INc. 6588141st Avenue NW, Ramsey, W 55303 769-4 9175 7&3-323-4739 Fax June, 15, 2007 Allen Franz 3550 Hampshire Avenue North Crystal, MN 55427 Subject: Engineering Observations, Soil testing & Geotechnical Recommendations Proposed Patio Deck, NTI Project No. 07-8271 INTRODrUCTION Allen Franz requested Northern Technologies, Inc. (NTI) perform engineering observations and soil testing for a proposed wood patio deck off the back of his residence. The purpose of the observations and testing was to determine the depth to suitable soils for support of the deck and provide recommendations for support of the deck. CONCLUSIONS Based on our test results and our experience, foundations may be designed for a maximum net allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf). Cast in place concrete piers could be utilized for support of the deck and should be a minimum of six feet below existing site grade for protection from frost. A sonotube or similar casing should be installed during drilling and prior to placing concrete to prevent wall collapse and also to reduce skin friction between the piers and soils to minimize uplift from frost action. Based on our hand auger soil sampling, the pier base(s) should extend to 6 feet below grade at soil borings 1 and 2 and to 8 feet below grade at soil boring 3. Actual depth of piers should be determined during construction to ensure they terminate on native soils and not fill. PROJECT INFORMATION, QBSIER'VATION METHODS & RESULTS On May 25, 2007, Northern Technologies, Inc. (NTI) advanced three hang auger borings at the proposed pier locations for the deck and as indicated on the attached sketch. Allen indicated three piers would be desired for support of the deck. Specifically, the deck is proposed as 16 feet in width (distance extending out from house) by 20 feet in length. The deck is proposed to be supported by attaching to the existing house on one end and the other end supported by concrete piers. 06-18-'07 08;56 FROM -NORTHERN TECH, INC, 763-323-4739 T-085 P003I005 F-117 Geotechnical Recommendations Allen Franz Deck Crystal, Minnesota Three hand augers were performed at the proposed locations of the three concrete piers. The hand augers were advanced to a depth of ten feet below existing grade each. Specifically, we encountered the following soil profile: Depth HA -1 0-5 feet Sandy Clay, Trace gravel, Dark Brown (fill) 5-7 feet Silty Sand, Little Gravel, Dark Brown (native coarse alluvium) 7-10 feet Sandy Clay, Trace Gravel, Dark Brown (native fine alluvium) Depth HA -2 0-4 feet Mixture of Sandy Clay, Clayey Sand and Silty Sand, Trace gravel, Mostly Dark Brown (fill) 4-10 feet Sandy Clay, Trace Gravel, Olive Brown (native fine alluvium) Depth HA. -3 0-8 feet Mixture of Sandy Clay, Clayey Sand and Silty Sand, Trace gravel, Mostly Dark Brown with pieces of concrete (fill) 8-10 feet Sandy Clay, Trace Gravel, Olive Brown (native fine alluvium) EXAMPLE PIER SIZING Based on a deck size of 320 square feet and a live plus dead load of 100 psf the total weight to be supported would be 32,000 pounds. Considering Vz of the load supported by the house the concrete piers would support 16,000 pounds. If three piers are utilized each pier would support approximately 5,334 pounds. Utilizing the net allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 psf for each pier, an area of (5,334 lbs/2,500 psf) or 2,14 square feet would be required. This results in a pier diameter of 1.65 feet or 19.8 inches. For simplicity, three 20 inch diameter concrete pier should be utilized. Similarly, for a system of four piers, four 18 inch diameter piers should be utilized. 06-18-'07 08:56 FROM -NORTHERN TECH, INC, 763-323-4739 Geotechnical Recommendations Allen Ranz Deck Crystal, Minnesota T-085 P004/005 F-117 We wish to point out the local building codes and our assumptions regarding live and dead loads should be verified prior to constructing the deck. Our recommendations are for soil bearing only and not for structural integrity of the deck itself or design assumptions noted. We can be available for consultation during final design, planning or during construction. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you on this matter. Should you have any questions, please call us at (763) 433-9175. Respectfully Submitted, Northern Technologies Inc. Michael Wasmund, P.E. Regional Manager Attachments: Boring Location Sketch HA2007 ProjectsTranz Deck (07-8375)\8ngi.w xmiR16ngineering ReportstDeek.doc I herby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Duly Registered Professional Engineer under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael Wasmund Date: 6/15/2007 Reg. No. 40 544 k P Ila I�Nnl�m q,ntiM yryr�� M� p�nY 4L nn 11� : 1 Iq IInl I nl I t �I I i ll i"I n SII �� muY I"F'�nllwl n�lll ��.��ldl gala Lu, IIII y� 1111:°I ltil�u��91i�h�nn..lin R'i*gi.; s"I nn 11� I t GSWI-Imw "IN^'ilWinypfiP��.mnX nI�11p ,I� i ryF�"b a dl nll�l pll II W ' wNl9 1 1 Mh �eM �� Ihll (11111 n nP�� 1 Ilrll��l ddi n 1 I :. ' ' •X: • ' E ♦! �" � ." :, � �,f of r lS V ilr+ r � TM too 40 b or* n 4p �fM I , • to M WIIN:'�Y.a "wl ,� 1.: Ir .:,.• I''. YI L'4� 1 a �� .. -rt�� • y y,xS'^nr" w ♦ 9 I y �. a,rr+ u l'�^ �'n�p,�♦":N" ,;>m r I, a • '' I,yw tlNi b ",brow *m'ru:- �' ♦, "> ,:hr«'* i 1 r 11 ft"Ando' r n - M':` • � � M:w" n ::ux•= r* � "� I � � I'IIiM!bhhltllNNH� . ._ owoo � N ,n f w rwnxwwwwwr nw wnuwwpnw w I Ii6N1) ,. LI!dNh h: 6 Illd;,'Nu" q „NII W N11 III !«w! yh w I I I I II III 11111 I I r I I !, JI ' V dl;l Ilpl I halrl:l um 1 �I !ia h14A1 Ili il.,., Ip I v11 Im"w,-: � ;PNMI!I I I ai', 11 I IN�IIw'IIIqq�II�NNIIp 1 ��a.;NII�IIIN III �N I,: 1d I 41:,tlr I Il lhl"I" ,,. ..r I ":. ...11..E :. ...:: � ,. ,..:. .,.I::. la:,o r, i1,1 :I r I�hI H I :.... ,...Ir:. n.l � L, ,..I 1., .. , .. !I♦ :.,.,Lid I :. I'll uNl :.. 1 AI.r ,•,,, I...:: o,,, � 1. 1�p :A, '. % uhl p lu;:. XN ,7dn: I w.n: I ,..,... IL.. I I. I:: r. I. ,:r I .I..Ynm' I 1 ,• ,.,4 : h: ,,,.,, 1 I IM:, , �m,ld � L �N ,I,r: .11:6.1„�;:IP., ...:I N. II "'I:'u:. � r �I 1 I, .I; 11 1: 1 h a. I I I Ir: I r I I N. h NI 1 I. IIr III r u... NIN!Lo Lo i' pp I d„ I. .. y I r I. .I I., I ...,,. ..r � I .. .. ,I, ::.I .1 I 1 • :..:,. _u. ,x:..:a I_I,: !.i4. N 1u1. ..I I � 1 1 ,. I I :rl , . x :, L.I 1 :. I Y0 I' I : % ., ,I r'r , I F, �.:.: � �1,1,_I;: ,. I .. „I ;n:, ,r 1, ., :. le. I�I I . IL . � I �h V �h . .1. L x � h I IIII' . +I6 :'u',I.. I �;1:'u%h I".: ..:: � rv:,[[: p +N 1 rN�.: r x: GI: .6.n 11%:Irl, .I �I L:N:r '-: �il '...,. I'N% •y. III :'„,1, 1! dry:,q I :,Iul, ,xb ANj ” '.. MI, I I �{]N,�, �% Id q, ��.III IJ'q' ; I,: ,• I it 1 ryII: I � r'i,l !� 91�6au': Ii I�H'Ia la I I Irl :' ' ,. r:. Mu �Nli u9l Sipa' n.l :: �� ' 1 M.:. NI•h 1 I '.:: II I 1 I ::111 � "� 1 I; Ip1. r Idw 11711N,I N IIINg is pl N, 416 • 'N II , rll 1 II, INI w I>Ix I IMr 1 11 1 X M W iN A �Ilflplldl �1XI%Na o .'': I�l' IINI N ;,1 '111P1`I AI iiI 4,hIISl,IiI P� !II9up VhII I µ prl'mpl l I,«w :h 11 1 11h w IN .. 1 7111 pl" hN �,:'�I rtll+y GI 1 11 h k %I, l,' N •, J elN ,I I'll �I,ti�M n I� L:I a "h N Itli :I I� fIIV p;; L I :. a al r.” p IN NI dt 11 'I�:Ih.II' n "I I, i ! :.µ tlI1M:i, X I,: ,Nlh M m ,;., 1 1 I MI IM I1y 'lirtt ... . .... ... . ... 41 40' lit hol, Lou RIO 47 x. So ZVly I .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ji! d IM . I . 15, ........... WAWA I. a it I i I I � n ,wT to i ilk ,,.. i li �u ,,n,uMai iw�wr*ww,IIMH " u9WdhlyN;uu �+WdNllYuuyNNYNua1®;i i I N � i I � y i, I lug N� II b�;i I �h 4i,1� ; i I„ I i I,llhl�ll �' III IIjIP,N, � ; '�''I �I�I� ; I, II � 4 0,. �JIIRI� h ', ;,; '� �N'i!� � h !I:I'� i '�. ��, fM•Ip dl' �r�µ � !�� mi;7�' * �'Wh, �dd, i ��j�,... ,4.. h�4�1 {�h F �r IppII Ill I ull I . I � I lu Val d Na I al it ,�Iilq�� ikil �N2Ilili'jl 11Nl� � •� h'�t `..., w^ ,�liii�'' hP,' , ,:�: @I Nr a II "��': I 16V 0. u NN I '. IW I I�YnI � IIII NInI t Hh I I ,I I I tl Inr'h'� N' d T ! ii Ila ul NI pi �It In V;•I b ,I: NwV I ,IIu „I�'il�l„'x bN lM Ali! I�' N� i'p'�III' "Dili" 16mr 1 II Ia6! V rtl K':r �urlwr IIS,_. ilylw 13 I:c rpllA�'I I :I i III II ii II I rti Itiry I hal. " I NII ��II p III I IA I I��p�� ail I I A I SII II �II % kl�i"N llillidII 'I� Am mx wyI'llml N I�II w IN%l iw %ryp�� I I✓I CoA f �� I nx W. I,14 uN 4 pl ww, M I I I 'IA I I �{ A I ulWll.I II 1,1 awl Nx IW" � I wM IV ��II%hl rvi I d .:NII IwIW% n I I IlihV��u,M_ rv�ly NhNll 'A"""te. 411 uuw:�l� " , i� _ it � r .«" � .., • .' " , • . _,�•. , ., � r. 'r " " ,ti+ � SII � � t�� • „ r x u+lw'v n pr Ids u' m a a9. SSFwAr � IAF Aa G.� uJ .�. «ti9 .� '•aa'. � . ., Y .: w � ��rt ,-�"�uIIhMJX�3�►..�� um4�tl�� w dk �w ��,,, illa I r '�ir I, ��'�4 ,' ql��l ' °'"'� w�n 'wn� � �7�"' r° o. - n,..� Yom" i. „ �.� ' :, , I,le I a � y�u '.,, dal �r��I' Nnl�� '� � �,Id I� �i�ai, i ' '"I�•,. �;; �,r �i' IM IqH��"ay,�rl� "`e;;f ,• J4.�„ - ., � ., w .� .� 4mo-"*ma» iu „aa�I r iln . �y wl �.. .T:. �.....+.."+• Ir .1 r�r•, * 0 �»'N"�I �" ,,. 4. ,+..ems I i '� dI u,l� m �.4 rl"�., �r h � 'y xo:, a � q', .... m''II m I Now - 4 L, .�y .. :.. � •. +JAI ; ,� ..►~.ice r'ii�ll� ,!III` "w" •�q1►r., . mul J a rNMnIF M ,a p WN Builder's'CopY Resi entia ommercta 4 Inspector of Buildings Construction: April 26.t . . ted—.1 . WHEREAS, has duly filed is the afficei'of he Building Inspector, application to to ad (Build, install, add to, remodel, repair, move, wreck as the case `:n:ay be)'. LOCATION OF BUILDING Lot Block " Addition Fra Size of Lot de- Long Street No 3550 Hampshire Ave. N. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING FRONT DEPTH I STORIES I CONSTRUCTION I ROOF I TO BE USED 16 s 16 Fri I N0 I Deck Z ( } ( Slidatlg E1lass dear ( I Contract Price Excluding (list) Distance from front lot line Ft. . From side lot line 1 F't. From rear lot line F t. Front of building faces N_ S E` W on (Street) Lot by (Registered surveyor) surveyed Architect or Engineer Owner Allen Franz Address 3550 Hampshire Ave. X. NOTICE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELEC- TRICAL PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. - Permission is hereby granted for above improvement upon th"e THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: Footing Forms Rough -In express condition and consideration that said owner and his contractors < and/or architects, agents, workmen and employees shall comply in all respects with the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Crystal regulating the P g g g location, size, use and height of buildings, the arrangement of buildings on lots, the Building Code of the City of Crystal, and all other ordinances of the City of Crystal, and es not cover the use of public property. Gypsum Board Before Tape Allen Franz 3550 Hampshire Ave. N. 533-1759 Final d 1C :1 I d tr'a1 Resi entia ommercta 4 Inspector of Buildings Construction: A16� Foa-rIN&6 n PER 977NP 67'1 hWl a 4"we JL 11 �p ZL --�Jv org 7-' H Avs Lr Ave. M. S 8 V- 4 co'- 4. 5;" E gg.8( n7, 0 9 o. l r e6t So e�,�s E�• k31 Q � N C!1 K Ave. M. S 8 V- 4 co'- 4. 5;" E gg.8( n7, 0 9 o. l r e6t So e�,�s E�• k31 Petition for Allen I Franz, of 3550 Hampshire Avenue North, Crystal, MN to leave the Shed attached to the south -end of garage and rebuild the deck. Name Address Date Name��`�, Address b Ci3 A Date Gd —T-07 Namek /1+ AddressS 2�j Cy V t Date ) Q /�7 l Namg �-L Address Date I— w � A 14� 7 c: til 5 i 'a.C/ ///= Name ,�� L "l' 4 Address 5-3 3 �_ R/ Date Name Address Date Name Address Date • k22 Petition Names Continued ... J�% C % Name Address J � i , Date q lo 11 \ Name 51�,CLi-�-s Address 6701N - I__► F Mill U J Address Date /017/67 Date (,O3 A Name L 1 LU'� 1J+rQt c Address Date Name ROM Name Address Address Address Date Date Date Ewe K23 DATE: November 8, 2007 TO: Planning Commission (November 13th meeting) FROM: John Sutter, City Planner/Assistant Community Development Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Application 2007-14 for a Low Density Residential Planned Development at 4908 & 4910 Bernard Avenue North I� Q BACKGROUND The property at 4908 Bernard Avenue North is zoned R-1 Low Density Residential and is large enough for a two family dwelling under the R-1 district regulations. Construction on the existing two family dwelling began in 2006 and it is nearly complete. The south unit is addressed as 4908 and the north unit is addressed as 4910. The property owner would like to be able to sell each unit separately. This would require a townhouse -style plat with a parcel matching each dwelling unit's footprint plus a common parcel for the rest of the site. To accomplish this, the property owner has applied for rezoning and re - platting as a Low Density Residential Planned Development. Notice of the November 13, 2007 public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property on October 31, 2007 with an updated version (changing the meeting date from the 12th to the 13th due to the Veterans Day holiday) mailed on November 2, 2007. Notice was also published in the Sun Post on November 1, 2007. The following Exhibits are attached: A. 2006 aerial photos showing the property B. Current photos showing the building and site C. Narrative submitted by the applicant D. Excerpt from City Code listing criteria for PDs less than 2 acres E. Proposed Preliminary Plat of Tranquility Bay F. Proposed Final Plat of Tranquility Bay G. Mark-up of Preliminary Plat showing required boundary change STAFF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION The subject property, 4908 Bernard, was split off from 4916 Bernard in 2005. The two family dwelling recently built on the subject property is permitted due to the property's large size and wide frontage. As the property is currently configured, the two units cannot be sold separately because they are both located on the same lot. This means that in its current configuration at least one of the units on the subject property would always have to be rental. R-1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 4908 & 4910 BERNARD PAGE 1 OF 2 The proposed Planned Development would re -plat the property into three lots: One lot for each dwelling unit surrounded by a third lot of common property. Because each unit would be located on a separate lot, they could be sold and owner -occupied separately from each other. This would not change the configuration of the building. City code section 515.57 Subd. 3 a) requires Planned Developments to be at least 2 acres in area unless at least one of four criteria are met. Staff opinion is that this proposal meets #1 because the subject property is uniquely situated on a dead-end street adjacent to a lake. It could have been platted into two singly family lots fronting on Bernard Avenue, but that would have led to the building footprints taking up more of the site when compared to the planned development configuration of the two units being attached. Therefore the Planned Development will create the potential for each unit to be conveyed separately and be owner -occupied, while at the same time minimizing the impact of the units on the unique characteristics of the area including the topography, mature trees, and lake view, not only for the subject property but also for the neighborhood. The proposed planned development would comply with city code provided that the staff -recommended conditions (see below) are met. C. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Application 2007-14 for a Low Density Residential Planned Development, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Preliminary Plat and Final Plat shall be modified to add 16 feet on the west side of the subject property in order to ensure compliance with the standard 30 foot minimum setback from any external boundary of a Planned Development. Approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat also includes approval of the division of 4916 Bernard Avenue North to split off the east 16 feet of said property and combine that 16 feet with the subject property in the new plat. 2. The Preliminary Plat and Final Plat shall be modified to show drainage and utility easements 5 feet from the north and west boundaries of the plat, and 10 feet from the south boundary of the plat. 3. The Final Plat mylars will not be executed and released by the city until the property owner has paid the $1,000 Park Dedication Fee required by Section 510 of city code due to re -platting of the property into separate lots for each dwelling unit. Suggested findings of fact are that the proposal would comply with the requirements of Crystal City Code provided that the recommended conditions are met. Findings of fact and conditions of approval should be referenced in the motion. The City Council would consider a resolution approving the Preliminary and Final Plat of Tranquility Bay together with 1 st reading of the Planned Development rezoning ordinance at its next meeting on November 20, 2007. R-1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 4908 & 4910 BERNARD PAGE 2OF2 -"*N Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2007 The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Selected Parcel Data Parcel ID: 09-118-21-11-0106 Owner Name: JAMES L ALEXANDER Parcel Address: 4908 BERNARD AVE N , CRYSTAL, MN 55429 Property Type: VACANT LAND -LAK Homestead: NON -HOMESTEAD Area (sgft): 14714 Area (acres): 0.34 A -T -B: TORRENS Market Total: $229,000.00 Tax Total: $1,610.42 Date Printed: 10/3/2007 3:33:29 PM Current Parcel Date: 09/4/2007 Sale Price: $247,135.00 Sale Date: 11/2005 Sale Code: VACANT LAND http://gis.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx?PID=0911821110106 10/03/2007 Scale: 1 inch= 100.0 feet Sc g► ' ,, y!' � -� � ; "' mss• 4 _ F ky- Narrative for 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Planned Unit Development Application Our initial intent was to build a duplex on lot 4908 Bernard Ave. N. with the units numbered 4908 and 4910 (per City input). The South unit would be homesteaded, the North unit would be rented. However, based on input from Crystal City residents at the 2006 City -Wide Housing Conference, Discussion Group 41 — Owner -Occupied and Rental Housing, on April 7, 2006, it became clear two homestead units would be preferred. Therefore, we are applying to the City of Crystal to rezone 4908 Bernard Ave. N. from zone R-1 to a planned unit development enabling both units to be homesteaded by separate owners and changing the structure from a duplex to a twin -home. Thank you. Ja es Alexander Owner Charles J. McColgan Owner / General Contractor Notes: 1. It is understood that any home, with a proper rental license from the City of Crystal, mqy> be rented. However, without the Planned Development approval, it is guaranteed that one of the units trust be rented in perpetuity. 2. Upon review of property setbacks, the 30' West lot line setback requirement was reduced during the building permit process in favor of keeping the structure out of the East flood plain. Should the City of Crystal require the 30' West lot line setback, I will quit claim 16' from 4916 Bernard Ave. S. to the Tranquility Bay Planned Development. — 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. S. Charles J. McColgan Owner / General Contractor ,1 City of Crystal Zoning Code 515.57, Subd. 2 (Rev. 2004) f) High quality of design, and design compatible with surrounding land uses including both existing and planned. g) Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city. h) Development which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Subd. 2. Uses. Within the PD district all permitted uses and accessory uses are allowed. Within the PD district all uses allowed by conditional use permit within any other district are allowed by conditional use permit. Uses allowed by conditional use permit must be reviewed for compliance with the PD master development plan and with the applicable conditional use permit standards specified in this subsection. Uses allowed by conditional use permit are also subject to site and building plan review pursuant to section 520 of the city code. Subd. 3. Development Standards. Within the PD district all development must be in compliance with the following: a) Each PD must have a minimum area of 2 acres, excluding areas within a public right-of- way, designated wetland or floodplain overlay district, unless the applicant can demonstrate the existence of 1 or more of the following: 1) Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. 2) The property is directly adjacent to or across a right-of-way from property which has been developed previously as a PD or planned unit residential development and E will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved t development. S 3) The property is located in a transitional area between different land use categories or it is located on an arterial street as defined in the comprehensive plan. 4) The property is proposed to be developed with single family dwelling lots having a minimum area of 15,000 square feet. b) The uses proposed within a PD may be used only for a use or uses that are consistent with the comprehensive plan. C) Where the site of a proposed PD is designated for more than 1 land use in the comprehensive plan, the city may require that the PD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the city council deems appropriate to achieve the purposes of this subsection and the comprehensive plan. &kl*,D r- C � J �tl r i n r J CORNER OF LOT 4 t 245 r v eesl• \ / I I Tm 5pW 114.99LI tNJ mlIDTYt oF�CARLLSr s I ,,� I i �• A�/ 7 4 P / I L11' I eae o -- 9--�- /cess �.a / -23.01 -i-°• vv w •�P� ° i •C��' m6c i rrl I 1 y VE, R os cFn -_ .2 ease esea In LAST RECORDED OWNER James L. Alexander & Cindy L. Alexander 10725 202nd Street West Lakeville, MN 55044 APPLICANT Charles McCaigan C/O Spiderweb Investments, LLC PO Box 28338 Minneapolis, MN 55428 763-503-6880 IRON PIPE O 21.2 X5.9 ei I5. d e93 _y W �\ pi/ ////� �6 0 1 m 2 °s • _ 1RAGE asf.a 6s> h •� \ EXISTING HOUSE nsrs -5 TWIN s LOT 3 9 6.0 1• 2/ .9' I 24.0 8. I en ih: 3� •eswa •• 23.96 � � NBB%f9:i0"W ec I -i 21.1 �°''__ o <x � > •ess> q z� ? •_;� / s 1 r U M I x < e 30E ew. �caeoistc��! Q30E "'64: , essA• 6saz / te LO \ k� NI __'- I+ LINE OF LOT II N ^ 1 s W 2�i / {,e°.° �FD "I -se .LINEe�RNARD�N PIPE RLS a \-rr`t7��, 3 FT. CHAIN LINK FENCE TWIN LAKE .est ON WA7EA ELEVA7KVh �y \ ss.7so \.a f, FEBFt� 4 !g4Py \ .Ias q, Ia5ie"d,5 q p exi ,nnffr't'\ /J .., °_\1\ a •6.1.> '663 wJx •sue �` b6o •e�sl FD IRO! PIPE RLS 16456 l 1645611Ip PIPE 16456 sjsai /.. � � 5 A -It V. VA AC Denotes air conditioner CB Denotes catch basin COL Denotes column DG Denotes drain grate EM Denotes electric meter GM Denotes gos meter GW Denotes guy wire HYD Denotes fire hydrant IEDenotes edge of Ice elevation INV Denotes invert elevation MH Denotes monhole PP Denotes power pole RCP Denotes concrete pipe SANC Denotes sanitary cleanout SAN S Denotes sanitary sewer ST S Denotes storm sewer - VCP Denotes clay pipe W Denotes water line CED Denotes Cedar tree PINR Denotes Red Pine tree 20 0 20 4A PINW Denotes White Pine tree SPCG Denotes Colorado Green Spruce tree SCALE IN FEET 1 hereby certify that this survey, -plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Lord Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 17th day of October, 2007 SONDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. By. Scott J. Soukup, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 17256 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Bankers Title Owner and Encumbrance Report File No. 990911861. effective date September 16, 2007) That port of Lot 4, Block I, Carlson's Crystal Oaks and the accretions to sold lot, which lies east of the west 110 feet of that port of Lot 4, Block I, Carlson's Crystal Oaks and the accretions to said lot, described as follows; Commencing at the northwest corner of said lot; thence East along the North line of said lot, a distance of 245 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence West, returning along sold North line, to the intersection with the East line of the West 10 feet of said lot; thence South, along said East line, a distance of 116.96 feet, more or less, to the South line of said lot; thence East, along said south line and its easterly extension, a distance of 381 feet more or less, to the shore line of Twin Lake; thence Northerly along said shore line, to the intersection with line A; thence Northwesterly, along said Line A. a distance of 50 feet more or less, to the point of beginning. Line A is described as follows: commencing of the northwest comer of said lot; thence easterly, along the north line of said lot, a distance of 245 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence Southeasterly, deflecting to the right 11 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 50 feet, more or less to the shore line of Twin Lake, and there terminating. Tomens Property (Certificate No. 1177038) 1.) Location and sizes of underground utilities shown hereon are approximate only and are shown based on field location of visible fixtures in combination with available data provided by various sources. Some underground utility locations are shown as marked onsite by those utility companies whose locators responded to our Gopher State One Call, ticket number 50028969. Utilities shown are dependent on the completeness and accuracy of data provided. Other underground utilities of which we are unaware may exist. Verify 611 utilities critical `e91s to construction or design. 2.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 for precise onsite location of utilities prior to any excavation. 3.) Bonkers Title Owner and Encumbrance Report File No. 990911851, effective date September 16, 2007, was relied upon as to matters of record. 4.) The easterly port of the subject property appears to lie within Zone AE (Flood elevations determined) and the westerly part of the subject property appears to lie within Zone X, (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain), per the National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053CO212E, dated September 2, 2004. 5.) Areas: Lot1=3,212 Sq. Ft or 0.07 Ac. Lot 2=3,143 Sq. Ft. or 0.07 Ac. Lot 3= 19,555+/- Sq. Ft. or 0.4+/- Ac, Total- 25,910+/- Sq. Ft. or 0.6+/- Ac. 6.) The proposed elevations and proposed house location ore subject to review and change by the City Engineer, Building Dept, developer and owner. Proposed grades and house location which are approved by the City ore final. 7.) Zoning and setback information as provided by the Planning Department of the City of Crystal): The subject property is zoned R -I (Low Density residential). The setbacks for zone R -I (Low Density residential) ore: Building: Front: 30 feet from front lot line Side: 5 feet from side lot line Rear.30 feet from rear lot line There are exceptions to said setbacks, see Section 515.33 of the City of Crystol Zoning Code for the exceptions. Restrictions (Le., building setbacks, height and bulk restrictions, etc.) shown hereon ore based on information provided and are subject to interpretation. We connot certify to a restriction on the basis of on interpretation or the opinion of another party. Please contact local governing authorities for a determination of restrictions. Municipalities will generally issue a "Zoning Letter" outlining their zoning classification and applicable restrictions upon request 8.) Survey coordinate and bearing basis: Hennepin County Coordinate System. BENCHMARKS 1.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant located on the east side of Quail Avenue N. at 51st Avenue N. Elevation = 875.47 feet 2.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant located at the northeast Bernard Avenue N. and Quail Avenue N. Elevation = 872.73 feet Plat Certificote Dr g roe, PRELIM/NARYPLATOF.- TRANQU/L/TYBAY (MR. CHARLESMCCOLGAN) `ISUNDE HaDI EM Bleanwglan Free."y (R�• Sulle I�6 &eomMBtm. YMwto 55410.3x36 LAN1wVD SURVEYLNG ""(F� 851-eee-8526) North Or6c4: nd�.corn ", Pw6 Mian. 763-784-9346 fHC 7 L x w A wo 0 A 1 245 SCALE IN FEET A�;n I BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED IV ------ '8842511F 124. R8 ------- ----- TRAIVOUILITY r NW CORNER OF LOT 4- t '1 -1117- SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4 V88*4251 "W R.T. DOC. NO. ID A/ A NORTH LINE OF LOT 4 ------- C A 11 4: A I T C, % -------- T -CENTERLINE OF BERNARD AVE. N. -------- ------ I hereby certify that this plot of TRANQUILITY SAY is - - - - - - - - - - - - that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated Thattiport of Lot 4, Block 1, Carlson's Crystal Oaks and the accretions to said lot, which ties east of the west 110 feet of that port of Lot 4, Block 1, Carlson's Crys at Oaks the or will correctly set within we lands os of the date of the surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on the plat; that all year as indicated an the plat; that all water boundaries and wet ways are labeled and accretions to said lot, described as follows. public this ast was prepared by me or 6rder my direct supervision end that I am a duly icensed land surveyor /- Commencing at the northwest comer of said lot; thence East along the North line of said lot, a distance of 2 to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence West, returning along said North line, to the intersection of the State of Minnesota. with the East line of the Wes.151feet feet of said lot: thence South, along said East line, a distance of 116.96 feet, more or less. to the South line of sold lot; thence East. along said line S88'49 68,74zry said a of 50 feet more or less, to the point of beginning. LINE . Scott J. Soukup, Licensed Land Surveyor Line A is described as follows: commencing at the northwest corner of said lot; thence, easterly, along the north line of said lot, a distance of 245 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence South osterly, deflecting to the I e right degrees 00 00 STATE OF MINNESOTA Minnesota License No. 17256 minutes seconds, a distance of 50 feet, more or less to the shore line of Twin Lake, and there terminatil mg. COUNTY OF Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as TRANQUILITY BAY. The foregoing Surveyor's certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 200, by Scott J. Soukup, Licensed Land Surveyor. In witness whereof said James L. Alexander and Cindy L Alexander haw hereunto set their hands this — day of — 200� in z: DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT A RIO TO C. DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON o. TWN LAKE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY RLS. NO. 17255 z,q -5.00 146,5749 J0"W 3 WATER &EVA 77OW- 851.4 FT. aV BENCHMARK: in j 92.26 --------- FEBRUARY 28, TOP OF TOP NUT OF HYDRANT. ELEVATION=872.73 (j- 2005 FEET (N. G.V.D.-1929) C t3 3:3 oin • -- - - - - - - - - V* 3m8-2498 %F9 — 20 0 20 40 �----------- 16, 411 James L. Alexander STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this — day of Cindy L. Alexander 200_, by James L. Alexander and Cindy L. Alexander, husband end wife. Notary Public, _ My Commission Expires In witness whereof said M.in.t ... t Bank has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this — day of SIGNED: M.iniit—t Bank — it. County, Minnesota 200_. STATEOF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this — day of � 200_ by it. — of said M.Imetre.t Bonk, . Minnesota Banking corporation, an behalf of said corporotion. Notary Public, — County, Minnesota My Commission Expires Notary Public, . County, Minnesota My Commission Expires CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA This plot of TRANQUILITY SAY was approved and accepted by the City Council of Crystal, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held — ' 200— If applicable, the written comments and recommendotars, of the Commissioner of Tronspoatim and the County Highway Eng1'1ny.e'rf rthave been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03. Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA BY: TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 200 and prior years haw been paid for land described an this plat. Doted this — day of Jill L. Alverson, Hennepin County Auditor BY: SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Sec. 38.38.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this — day of William P. Brown, Hennepin County Surveyor BY: — REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plot of TRANQUILITY BAY was filed in this office this — day of — 200 at Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles BY: — 200— ty 200 o'clock _ML JISUNDE LAND SURVEYEVIG 91 1188*4910"W 58.30 . ..... SCALE IN FEET A�;n I BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED 271 :P. /24 .98 SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4 V88*4251 "W 271+1- 85.00 A/ A ------- C A 11 4: A I -------- T -CENTERLINE OF BERNARD AVE. N. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That James L. Alexander and Cindy L. Alexander, husband and wife, owner, and M.Instr..t Bonk, a Minnesota banking corporation, mortgages of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State I hereby certify that this plot of TRANQUILITY SAY is of Minnesota, to wit: a correct representation of the boundary survey, on the plot; that all monuments depicted on the plot how been be that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated Thattiport of Lot 4, Block 1, Carlson's Crystal Oaks and the accretions to said lot, which ties east of the west 110 feet of that port of Lot 4, Block 1, Carlson's Crys at Oaks the or will correctly set within we lands os of the date of the surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on the plat; that all year as indicated an the plat; that all water boundaries and wet ways are labeled and accretions to said lot, described as follows. public this ast was prepared by me or 6rder my direct supervision end that I am a duly icensed land surveyor shown and on the plat. I further certify that under the laws Commencing at the northwest comer of said lot; thence East along the North line of said lot, a distance of 2 to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence West, returning along said North line, to the intersection of the State of Minnesota. with the East line of the Wes.151feet feet of said lot: thence South, along said East line, a distance of 116.96 feet, more or less. to the South line of sold lot; thence East. along said line distancesouth0 and its easterly extension, of 381 feet more or less, to the share line of Twin Lake; the thence Northerly along said shore line, to the intersection with Line A; thence Northwesterly. .1-9 Line A, distance said a of 50 feet more or less, to the point of beginning. Scott J. Soukup, Licensed Land Surveyor Line A is described as follows: commencing at the northwest corner of said lot; thence, easterly, along the north line of said lot, a distance of 245 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence South osterly, deflecting to the I e right degrees 00 00 STATE OF MINNESOTA Minnesota License No. 17256 minutes seconds, a distance of 50 feet, more or less to the shore line of Twin Lake, and there terminatil mg. COUNTY OF Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as TRANQUILITY BAY. The foregoing Surveyor's certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 200, by Scott J. Soukup, Licensed Land Surveyor. In witness whereof said James L. Alexander and Cindy L Alexander haw hereunto set their hands this — day of — 200� James L. Alexander STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this — day of Cindy L. Alexander 200_, by James L. Alexander and Cindy L. Alexander, husband end wife. Notary Public, _ My Commission Expires In witness whereof said M.in.t ... t Bank has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this — day of SIGNED: M.iniit—t Bank — it. County, Minnesota 200_. STATEOF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this — day of � 200_ by it. — of said M.Imetre.t Bonk, . Minnesota Banking corporation, an behalf of said corporotion. Notary Public, — County, Minnesota My Commission Expires Notary Public, . County, Minnesota My Commission Expires CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA This plot of TRANQUILITY SAY was approved and accepted by the City Council of Crystal, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held — ' 200— If applicable, the written comments and recommendotars, of the Commissioner of Tronspoatim and the County Highway Eng1'1ny.e'rf rthave been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03. Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA BY: TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 200 and prior years haw been paid for land described an this plat. Doted this — day of Jill L. Alverson, Hennepin County Auditor BY: SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Sec. 38.38.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this — day of William P. Brown, Hennepin County Surveyor BY: — REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plot of TRANQUILITY BAY was filed in this office this — day of — 200 at Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles BY: — 200— ty 200 o'clock _ML JISUNDE LAND SURVEYEVIG 91 HOUSE C� I u RAR 4" GAS 'J 0 T 1 L_ V l I � LL NW CORNER OF LOT 4 i6 865.4 245 x 858.2 x 856. o 861.3 X89.1 \V' 866.1 x \ x / I x I I / w -FO IRON PIPE ------------- ---- 1V88 ° 2'S/ 'W NO TH LIN OF LO 4 �� - Ld SET 1'�RON PIP R C: ss4.s L(� , /------- t` I cp i / I. c.�- _� 12"PINI / t17 --- `�.,`` ---C --- I x 868 9 Oi I Q -F61.6 _-T� 11 4,200 x ass.a h IpTILITY' SEME PEF� CARLSC C Y TAL` AKS I x 868.9 I\ I y 1 i Ul1►E „, I -$i39 I 11-0 1 v\ I \ 865.0 863.5 . _.�, 18.1 a `r A 12 PINR \X I 859.4 i PINR 0�' 855.6 r� - -� - - \ 862.9 x' M' x r.»r P. 85 . I T 8 4.6 O 28.3 � I \ x 66.3 861.6 cs� �. 85 8 4.9 , CONC ETE \ O , 1' PINR I PINR ` I PINR I . ' PINR ti / 67 8 x 864.8 8 888 °49'�O " a ' 855.5` s C� \I 86 . 6, WALL ,/ 7 ED 865. r 86 6 8 6' 6 74 x vi I �' ' 860.6 � �106 GARAGE N \ 4.i �4 O 865.2 - 2�. _ 860.3 - - ' 857.-4-,°za 854.\ 865.6 DECK 860.3 86 .0 ' \, - PINR \ .., 0 865 5- - - - �, 7. 857 6 855.2 ,k 1 18.0 I \9. PIN �� r 865.7 12"PINR 28.3 lV 1 °' 21.2 o O 15.2 a5d.5 -� --- I rn� O I 22.0 �,i �� Ni5.9 N 0-- �ux 548 1 00 �G e 0 854.8 w x AC9.9 I N "� 1 857.5 w CONCRE PINR 8. v / Op �� b� 8.0 ° I °° GANDER W O~ CONCRETE � J 24.2 L x I � x � � ° �) I � � I � c DECK + J bn n f , 8 4.8 "I `.Z MRV I N GARAGE N 85f.4 857 rn i.2<; rn LL- L� 870.6 J \I CO Z 855.7 cp - co 0 O 34"OA 869. I 65. A C O I ^ x - tuj EXISTING HOUSE 854 6 LOr z W \ 86 �8 - I .3; 5.7 EMG L I { �3"CED ° 9 � x I870.6-Z► LL �- W N H OUSE - -,- 6.0 $sb 2 f ' , 85s.e S$$ �3 �,, ' F- O /1 /n, G! co �y 8. I ;° �� 857.1 -_ -- �i 7 Y f f, 854 Qo �� W 4916 BERNARD ✓ I s -'cs ss5s �_ o Q 9"P w �. /AVENUE N. GETT Thin, I _ . z I rn W o _ O �---- VERHANG y 5.4 �1 34 "OXX 2 1.8 O 868 x \� n W N i /N I 857.1 �856.I x p Z SING 856 . i uj v I 5.6 COL Q O (n FLOOD STORAC 870.6 "43. rn I� ►vun. IWC I I !) Z ND1ARlf). - - x 870.4 ..,,- 26.0 1 _g t 24.0 i I S.D I� 857 I f i p CO2; TE 855.1®� x 854.6 865.8 865.9 - DE N ETE I /% may. I- - - - - - - - cfl o/5.9 O O r - <c. COL (n Z / / �. ass. - .1 21. I N N 15.2/00 ° Z I V) O v 3SANC L 5 Q p- a 23.96 --o�: I 867.8 x A 9.9 869.9 85 . D C K i C07 1 x 855.7 54. w Q 854.: 110 , N88 °49'30 "W ,�s - - - Z 0 9."SP( 8685 N W x x 865. I I N LL - O U S 7.3 6 `� _ CONCRETE i COL : 0 8 8.9 0 T 64'8 ' a60•4 860. x x59.0 85 6 x 857. \ W o \ B I !J 9 G f 1 x � Q x 854.2 869.9 i 8 .7 0 " 8 °'30'E \ 0 _ _ ass.4 = J x w \ h ass.4 O 3 s6 .o $so.7 6 3 1 1 i 857.1 �i - ------ 865.1 /\\\ 1\fI0 , 864.3 1 �61.3 1 x I 56.4 --- 6. ,1 i865.1 N x 857.50`__--� 865.1 2\ I QJ x 860.0 . 1-- �' 868.2 - 23.01 H '�� _ --- 50 X 9 -x`67.9 6 �\ 865. - OUTF�LINE OF LOT A 868.2 �� 8 7. 865.9 864 6 $� N ° 2'5/ "I1' 27c/ L1 I 67. I 866.2 6„ CIP 65.9 865.8 865.0 865.1 863.5 ��61.8 x 859.5 FD I ON PIPE RLS I R MH I ( x / 38 I I N x G x 861.8 x 854. TOP=8 .5 ( 858'3 2 INV= 8.8' 8 x 84 pi 65.8 865 5 I I I I \ 866 x 866.1 868.6 867.3 \ 865.3 EN LINE OF tNARD A N. 8 0.5 CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS ON PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS October 16, 2007: 1. Approved a variance to reduce the rear (west) setback at 6305 Corvallis Avenue 2. Approved a conditional use permit and site plan approval for outdoor storage at 5712 Lakeland Avenue (Reliable Property Services) 3. Approved a conditional use permit for a privately -owned community center at 5736 Lakeland Avenue (African Market) 4. Adopted a resolution approving the preliminary and final plat of Crystal Park Station (excess CPRR property west of Douglas Drive) 5. Approved 1St reading of an ordinance amending Section 515.33 Subd. 8 c) to allow a reduction of side setbacks in the R-1 district in certain circumstances November 5, 2007: 1. Approved 2nd reading of an ordinance amending Section 515.33 Subd. 8 c) to allow a reduction of side setbacks in the R-1 district in certain circumstances 2. Approved 1St reading of an ordinance amending Section 405 (revised sign regulations) (Date) City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive N. Crystal, MN 55422 Subject: Planned Development — "Tranquility Bay" -- 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Crystal Planning Commission (11112107 meeting) Crystal City Council (11/20/07 meeting) Please approve the rezoning of 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. from R-1 to a Planned Development so both residences can be homesteaded instead of having one home a permanent rental unit. Thank you. Sincerely, (Name & Address) No (Date) City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive N. Crystal, MN 55422 Subject: Planned Development — "Tranquility Bay" -- 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Crystal Planning Commission (11/12/07 meeting) Crystal City Council (11/20/07 meeting) Please approve the rezoning of 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. from R-1 to a Planned Development so both residences can be homesteaded instead of having one home a permanent rental unit. Thank you. Sincerely, 57z5Qtca-f /7 IV. s m fu 5-5 2I (Name kAddress) (Date) 11-16 --0 7 City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive N. Crystal, MN 55422 Subject: Planned Development — "Tranquility Bay" -- 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Crystal Planning Commission (11/12/07 meeting) Crystal City Council (11120107 meeting) Please approve the rezoning of 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. from R-1 to a Planned Development so both residences can be homesteaded instead of having one home a permanent rental unit. Thank you. Sincerely, (Name & Address) (Date) Ifl- O C City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive N. Crystal, MN 55422 Subject: Planned Development — "Tranquility Bay" -- 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Crystal Planning Commission (11/12/07 meeting) Crystal City Council (11/20/07 meeting) Please approve the rezoning of 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. from R-1 to a Planned Development so both residences can be homesteaded instead of having one home a permanent rental unit. Thank you. r Sincerely, . . a 5 (Name & Address) (Date) ( 4l 1616-7 City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive N. Crystal, MN 55422 Subject: Planned Development — "Tranquility Bay" -- 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Crystal Planning Commission (11/12/07 meeting) Crystal City Council (11/20/07 meeting) Please approve the rezoning of 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. from R-1 to a Planned Development so both residences can be homesteaded instead of having one home a permanent rental unit. Thank you. Sincerely, 0k-'sta) (Name c Address) M&J 1)1�,e J\,� ss Qe--1 l�t4C�C.��I (Date) City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive N. Crystal, MN 55422 Subject: Planned Development — "Tranquility Bay" -- 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Crystal Planning Commission (11112/07 meeting) Crystal City Council (11/20/07 meeting) Please approve the rezoning of 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. from R-1 to a Planned Development so both residences can be homesteaded instead of having one home a permanent rental unit. Thank you. Sincerely, i r (Name & Address) 1/ <l (Date) City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive N. Crystal, MN 55422 Subject: Planned Development — "Tranquility Bay" -- 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Crystal Planning Commission (11/12/07 meeting) Crystal City Council (11/20107 meeting) Please approve the rezoning of 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. from R-1 to a Planned Development so both residences can be homesteaded instead of having one home a permanent rental unit. Thank you. Sincerely, (Name & Address) try (Date) ' City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive N. Crystal, MN 55422 Subject: Planned Development — "Tranquility Bay" -- 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. Crystal Planning Commission (11/12/07 meeting) Crystal City Council (11/20/07 meeting Please approve the rezoning of 4908 / 4910 Bernard Ave. N. from R-1 to a Planned Development so both residences can be homesteaded instead of having one home a permanent rental unit. Thank you. Sincerely, -� d (Name & Address) 1 �/`"% q r C1`1 ^ W I ISSL u TO DISCUSS IS DATE NAME Please Print ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. (Optional) PLEASE PRESENT TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY PRIOR TO MEETING ISS TO DISCUSS ISS --� DATE / / — (3 ^ '(7 NAME Please Print n ADDRESS A3 " � 67 )�iAP-Aj TELEPHONE NO. (Optional) 7 � ,, - tJ-3 J`�-� Z �7- 44l PLEASE PRESENT TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING IS; TO DISCUSS IS DATE NAME Please Print rj-3 eb -.0 © 7 ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. (Optional) PLEASE PRESENT TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING IS; ; TO DISCUSS IS DATE__ �__l � ' -7- NAME Please Print ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. (Optional PLEASE PRESENT TO THE RECORDING SECRETAR PRIOR TO THE MEETING Y IS TO DISCUSS IS 7— 3<� DATE 6 NAME j Z Ur Please Print ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. (Optional) PLEASE PRESENT TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING IS! To Dlscuss rs- ` q o S i �c o 3a-- 6's tie._ DATE �� l3 � fl 7 NAME C„� Please Print ADDRESS_ �jln\k,(o —j'SV, TELEPHONE NO. (Optional) PLEASE PRESENT TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING