The URL can be used to link to this page

2008.10.13 PC Meeting PacketMonday October 13, 2008 7:00 p.m. Crystal City Hall - Council Chambers 4141 Douglas Cr N A. CALL TO ORDER B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • September 8, 2008 regular meeting* C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consider Application 2008-10 for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a storage building at 2756 Douglas Drive North (Fantasia Salon and Spa).* 2. Consider Application 2008-11 for Site Plan Review for building renovations and alterations to the parking lot at 5502 West Broadway (Crystal Gallery).* 3. Consider Application 2008-12 to amend City Code Section 510 (Park Dedication).* 4. Consider Application 2008-13 for a Variance to allow an accessory building to be built closer to the street than the principal structure at 4552 Brunswick Avenue North.* 5. Consider the 2008 Update of the Crystal Comprehensive Plan.* D. OLD BUSINESS E. NEW BUSINESS F. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Development Status Report for quarter ending September 30, 2008.* 2. City Council actions on recent Planning Commission items.* 3. Staff preview of likely agenda items for November 10, 2008 meeting. G. OPEN FORUM H. ADJOURNMENT *Items for which supporting material are included in the meeting packet Page 1 of 4 CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 8, 2008 A. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:03 p.m. with the following members present: X Commissioner (Ward 1) X Commissioner (Ward 2) Vacant (Ward 4) Sears Whitenack [Chair] X Commissioner (Ward 1) X Commissioner (Ward 3) Commissioner (Ward 4) Davis VonRueden [Vice Chair] Scheibe X Commissioner (Ward 2) Commissioner (Ward 3) X Commissioner (At -Large) Nystrom Buck Strand Also present were Council Liaison Ed Lenoch and city staff members John Sutter and Corinne Elfelt. B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Sears to approve the minutes of the August 11, 2008 regular meeting. Motion carried. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. [Continued from August 11, 2008 meeting] Consider Application 2008-09 to amend City Code Section 515.21 and Sections 515.33 through 515.53 to allow certain types of telecommunications towers in all zoning districts subject to limitations on height, location, adjacent uses and other factors. John Sutter presented the staff report. Changes were indicated in alternate color ink. Mr. Sutter commented that each tower would require a CUP, with Planning Commission review and action by City Council. Also Mr. Sutter provided a copy of the attorney's comments and recommended changes on the dais for each commission member. Commissioner Whitenack asked whether staff thought T -Mobile would come in to propose 10-15 towers immediately. Mr. Sutter said that it was not likely as he had heard of their interest in only a couple of sites. Commissioner Davis questioned the attorney's comments on how the city would address the "significant gap" issue of the provider versus "end user". Mr. Sutter said this had not been resolved with the attorney. The tendency would most likely to be the less restrictive because of the other restrictions that are in place. G:APLANNING\PLANCOMM\2008\09.08\minutes.doc Page 2 of 4 Commissioner Strand expressed concern about co -location or whether there would be multiple poles in one area. Mr. Sutter indicated a minimum separation distance of 660 feet would keep from multiple poles being close together. Mr. Sutter indicated that there would likely be a significant fee, possibly $4000. The application fee would likely not encourage multiple applications for CUPs. The city would use the fee to off -set the costs to the city of hiring a professional to determine the technical information related to the application. They would help determine if there are "significant gaps" and whether the additional technical criteria are met. Commissioner Stand also wondered why on page 4 of the ordinance amendment the maximum height tower shall not exceed 82.5 feet and on Page 6 the maximum height of a tower is 165 feet. Mr. Sutter explained that the towers up to 165 feet in height are those in areas zoned light industrial or commercial. Commissioner Sears questioned page 7 of the ordinance item s). Mr. Sutter explained that this refers to antenna attached to a water tower or church steeple. The Public Hearing was opened by Commissioner Whitenack. The following were heard: Bonnie Swanson made the following comments: she is concerned about radio waves and radiation kids may be exposed in parks does not want towers may be interested in starting a petition to keep towers out of park Commission Whitenack reminded Ms. Swanson that no particular tower was being considered, only the general guidelines. Mr. Sutter reiterated that the Federal Government does not allow any possible health effects of towers be considered. If a petition were submitted for any particular tower the aesthetic impact on a neighborhood, for example, could be considered. These concerns could also be directed toward the City Council in addition to the Planning Commission. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed by Commissioner Whitenack. Planning Commission discussion: Commissioner Strand commented that she does not feel the towers belong in residential areas, the industrial areas would be more appropriate. Also, Commissioner Strand expressed concern about multiple poles. Commissioner Nystrom said that although she does not want to see the towers in parks, she understands that we are not able to preclude parks. Mr. Sutter stated that the ordinance gives the grounds for denial and allows some use of the Planning Commission's discretion. Any city owned property has the power of G:\PLANNING\PLANCOMM\2008\09.08\minutes.doc Page 3 of 4 ownership, as the owner, the city can say no. The City Council will have to establish criteria of where they are willing to possibly have towers placed. Commissioner Strand recommended that a fee could be paid in advance by those placing towers that could be used should the tower be vacated and the owner fail to remove it. Mr. Sutter said that the city could establish such an arrangement in any of their leases. Commissioner Sears had a question on page 3 (c) of the ordinance, whether the notification that was being sent to the property owners within 350 feet and those up to 1000 feet we receiving the same notice. Mr. Sutter indicated that all would receive the same notice. Commissioner Sears asked how the 3 acres lot size minimum was established. Mr. Sutter indicated that it reduces the number of potential locations. The attorney had communicated to Mr. Sutter that he didn't feel the city was being too restrictive with the 3 acre lot size. Commissioner Sears recommended a slight change to the language to 515.21 Subd. 4 c) 2, 3, and 4: "The City Council finds" to be replaced with "The City Council makes a finding". Commissioner Davis commented that the city needs to take a reasonable stance as the technology field is exploding. The commission needs to keep in mind what will benefit the citizens of Crystal. There may be some areas that need additional coverage and it would make sense to have some additional towers. However, there is a need to come to a balance. By limiting the number of sites and understanding that there are not very many providers this ordinance accomplishes that goal. Commissioner Davis also mentioned his understanding of the concerns for the aesthetics, but he feels the towers may not be as intrusive as one might think. Commissioner VonRueden asked if there will be any major changes as result of the attorney's comments. Mr. Sutter stated there would be not substantive changes as a result of the attorney's comments. Commissioner Whitenack asked what the recommended minimum separation was. Mr. Sutter stated 1/8 mile. Moved by Commissioner VonRueden and seconded by Commissioner Strand to recommend to the City Council to approve Application 2008-09 to amend City Code Section 515.21 and Sections 515.33 through 515.53 to allow certain types of telecommunications towers in all zoning districts subject to limitations on height, location, adjacent uses and other factors. Adding that the minimum separation should be 1/8 mile, take into consideration the comments of the attorney as outlined in his letter, and wording changes recommended by Commissioner Sears to 515.21 Subd. 4 c) 2, 3, and 4: "The City Council finds" to be replaced with "The City Council makes a finding". Motion carried. G:\PLANNING\PLANCOMM\2008\09.08\minutes.doc Page 4 of 4 2. Consider the 2008 Update of the Crystal Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Sutter presented the staff report. Commissioner Whitenack asked if Mr. Sutter expects any contention from the Met Council. Mr. Sutter indicated he did not anticipate any. Commissioner Whitenack opened the Public Hearing. No comments were heard. The Public Hearing was closed. There were no comments from the Planning Commission. Moved by Commission VonRueden and seconded by Commission Strand to continue until October 13, 2008 Planning Commission meeting the discussion of the 2008 Update of the Crystal Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried. D. OLD BUSINESS E. NEW BUSINESS F. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City Council actions on recent Planning Commission items. 2. Staffs preview of likely agenda items for October 13, 2008 meeting. -Storage building for Fantasia Salon Spa — 2756 Douglas Dr. G. OPEN FORUM H. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Sears and seconded by Commissioner Strand to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Motion carried. G:\PLANNING\PLANCOMM\2008\09.08\minutes.doc DATE: October 8, 2008 TO: Planning Commission (October 13th meeting) FROM: Jason Zimmermann, Code Enforcement and Zoning Administrator 011 SUBJECT: Consider Application 2008-10 for a Conditional Use Permit for a storage building as an accessory use at 2756 Douglas Drive (Fantasia Salon and Spa). A. BACKGROUND The subject property at 2756 Douglas Drive is currently occupied by Fantasia Salon and Spa. The applicant is proposing to construct a storage building on its lot. The shed will consist of 256 square feet and would be located behind the building in the southeast corner of the lot. The property is zoned C-2, General Commercial and a storage building as an accessory use requires a Conditional Use Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. The principal use is either a permitted use or an approved conditional use. 2. The storage building is located on the same lot as the principal use. 3. No detached accessory building shall be located closer to an abutting street than the principal structure. 4. The storage building does not exceed 30% of the gross floor area of the principal use. Storage building (256 square feet) is 6% of principal use (4524 square feet). 5. Occupancy and use of the storage building is directly related to principal use and the same party has full control and use of both the storage building and the principal use. 6. The City Council determines that the architectural style is compatible with the principal building and surrounding land uses. 7. The City Council determines that such use will not conflict with the character of development intended for this zoning district. 8. The City Council determines that all applicable requirements of subsection 515.05 subd. 3 a) and section 520 are considered and satisfactorily met. 515.05 Subd. 3 a): In addition to specific standards or criteria included in the applicable district regulations, the following criteria shall be applied in determining whether to approve a conditional use permit request: 1) The consistency of the proposed use with the comprehensive plan. 2) The characteristics of the subject property as they relate to the proposed use. 3) The impact of the proposed use on the surrounding area. As with all conditional use permits, a public hearing held by the Planning Commission must precede City Council action on the application. The public hearing notice was published in the Sun Post on October 2, 2008 and sent to those property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. The Planning Commission will hold the public hearing _ on October 13, 2008 and make a recommendation for the City Council to consider at its October 21, 2008 meeting. The following Exhibits are attached: A. Aerial photo showing the location of the subject property. B. Narrative submitted by applicant. C. Site plan. D. Floor plan. E. Roof framing plan. F. Building section plan. G. Elevation plan. B. STAFF COMMENTS The shed will be used by Fantasia Salon and Spa to store fixtures and seasonal items. There are currently two smaller sheds that will be removed upon completion of the new building. One of these sheds is presently located within the rear parking lot. Removing this shed frees up additional parking behind the building. The shed will be located in the grass area at the southeast corner of the building and therefore will be less visible from the street. It will consist of vinyl lap siding and the color will match the existing building. C. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit for a storage building as an accessory use at 2756 Douglas Drive, subject to the following conditions: A building permit application shall be submitted for review and approval prior to construction of the storage building. 2. The two existing sheds must be removed upon completion of the storage building. 3. The storage building shall only be used to store items associated with the principal use on the lot. 4. There shall be no outdoor storage of any materials or equipment. Planning Commission action is requested. The City Council would consider the Planning Commission's recommendation at its next meeting on October 21, 2008. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FANTASIA SALON AND SPA- 2756 DOUGLAS DRIVE 2 11—I\ Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2008 The data contained on this page Is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Selected Parcel Data Parcel ID: 21-118-21-33-0038 Owner Name: TWILA M DONLEY Parcel Address: 2756 DOUGLAS DR N , CRYSTAL, MN 55422 Property Type: COMMERCIAL -PREF Homestead: NON -HOMESTEAD Area (sgft): 37934 Area (acres): 0.87 A -T -B: TORRENS Market Total: $575,000.00 Tax Total: $18,909.62 Date Printed: 9/26/2008 1:27:58 PM Current Parcel Date: 9/4/2008 Sale Price: $0.00 Sale Date: / Sale Code: EXHIBIT A http://gis.co.hennepin.nm.us/HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx?PID=2111821330038 09/26/2008 We are requesting a conditional use permit to construct a permanent, secure, visually appealing storage garage on the property located at 2756 Douglas Drive North in response to the need for additional storage space for fixtures and seasonal items from the Fantasia Salon and Spa. There are currently two smaller sheds located on the property that have begun to fall into a state of disrepair and are not large enough to fit the growing storage needs of the salon. Security is another mitigating factor for the construction of a larger, permanent building. By limiting the number of entrance points into the new structure and placing it adjacent to the well lit east lot, the chances for break-ins will be greatly reduced. The owner for the Salon has invested a large amount of capital and time to improve the exterior of the building and this storage facility is the last piece of the project. The structure has been designed and placed on the property to conform to all of the current city building codes and will not have setback issues with property lines. At the completion of construction the two existing structures will be removed from their current location which will increase the number of parking spaces as well as improve the overall look of the exterior of the building. Please direct any questions about the proposed project to my attention at the number listed below. Cordially, Erik 261 eyv (612) 386-4823 EXHIBIT B 0 'ite Plan 2756 Douglas Drive oh Crystal MN, 55422 16' Proposed new Garage/Shed site 16'x 16' Two existing sheds will be removed atter new one is assembled EXHIBIT C m T-011 OVP,P,NANG 6'-011 13UIl-PING WIDTH 6X6 # 10 WIP,F MF5H IN CONCrFS 51 -AP ( OWR AP 5191,lc�5 611, TYPICAL) 9'X V OVP,P,NFAP POOP, 91-0 11 O.N. POOP, OFFNIN6 ?5'-6 FLOOF 'FlLAN- lCAL �: /'III - 1 OII Jl./`LL T-011 OVErHAN6 PONL�Y 5fOPA6� C LP6, 2756 POU61,A5 PPM N0PM CP,YSTAI., MN. 55422 1 1 a 20'-0" O,A. VU55 LMTH `I T-011 T-011 nVFPHAN� 16' -0" VU55 5PAN OVMM6 FOOF FFAMIN6 PLAN 2X4 �OAOLIf5 @ 16" O.C' TYFICAL �NP-FM?AM� 055 %P-MAMML TPU55 2M LOOWU5 @ 16" O.C. fYPIC& W PONL�Y 5TOPMG �LbG, 2156 b0U6LA5 WK NON CMZY5%, MN. 55422 [ 2 I p00F CON50UCfION -240# A5PHALf SNINCI F5 ON 15 L�, WOFIN6 FFLf, I/ 2"05P p00F 51-1WHING WV H -CLIPS, mr-FNGINFmp FOOF TPU55F5 @ 2-4" O.C., IN N 6 12 2.4" OVFIG 10 1YpICAL 24" OWHAN6 1YpICAL 00 W11?F MFSN TOC F P FNS" 12OWN INTO THN W6F OF SLAP A MIN. OF 6", TYpICAL SLOPF OAF AWAY FFOM %ILPIN6, TYP- r�uLeiNG 5�cfloN 5CA,F ; ?/ 8" - 1'-0'' 5'& MGM ALUMINUM SOFFIT AN12 FASCIA W — 2X 411'WF P SILL PLAt CONNNUOUS W/%2" nIA, ANCHOF POLYS @,5211 O.C. z N PONL�Y 5TOPA6� 00, 2756 b0U6LA5 PFIVF NOM,, CI?Y5fA-, MN. 55422 POUPLF 2X4 fOp FLAS CONTINUOU5,1YPICAL z WALL CON5TFUCfION - VINYL 51bING ON 71161, 05P 5HWHIN6, 2X4 %P5 @16" O,C, c o 4" CONC, 5LA13 WI11-I 6X6 #IO MFSN ON 4" SANP FILL (CONCrffF fO CSF MINIMUM 5000 19515TMN6T ) W11?F MFSN TOC F P FNS" 12OWN INTO THN W6F OF SLAP A MIN. OF 6", TYpICAL SLOPF OAF AWAY FFOM %ILPIN6, TYP- r�uLeiNG 5�cfloN 5CA,F ; ?/ 8" - 1'-0'' 5'& MGM ALUMINUM SOFFIT AN12 FASCIA W — 2X 411'WF P SILL PLAt CONNNUOUS W/%2" nIA, ANCHOF POLYS @,5211 O.C. z N PONL�Y 5TOPA6� 00, 2756 b0U6LA5 PFIVF NOM,, CI?Y5fA-, MN. 55422 12 �poNr m x W �L�VAVON 51P� �L�VAfION SCA. ; �/ 16" - 1'-0'' SCA. PONL�Y STOPAGF 13�bG, 2156 POUCALA5 INK NOM CpY5f&, MN. 55422 DATE: October 8, 2008 TO: Planning Commission (October 13th meeting) FROM: Jason Zimmermann, Code Enforcement and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Consider Application 2008-11 for Site Plan review for building and parking lot modifications at 5502 West Broadway (Crystal Gallery). A. BACKGROUND The subject property is 7.74 acres and is occupied by the Crystal Gallery Mall. The work would consist of remodeling and renovating the interior and exterior of the retail mall and attached 2 -story medical office building. The mall will be "de-malled" as part of the renovations with the claimed area being added to individual retail spaces. Mall retailers will each have entrances directly from the exterior. The office building will be modified for existing tenants and set up to accommodate new medical office users. The mall portion and office building will both receive new exterior finishes. Exterior work for the office building will also include a new covered entrance and drive -under canopy on the northwest side of the building. In addition to the building work, the parking lot will also be modified. 49 parking spaces and landscape islands will be added and the total lot coverage will be reduced by approximately 4,000 square feet or 1.2%. The southernmost curb cut along West Broadway would be removed and the south parking lot for the office building would be connected to the main parking area on the west side of the lot. The property is zoned C-2, General Commercial. Site plan review is required for the building and site improvements. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Post on October 2, 2008 and mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the property. At the October 13, 2008 meeting, the Planning Commission will hold the public hearing and may make a recommendation for the City Council to consider at its October 21, 2008 meeting. The following Exhibits are attached: A. Aerial photo showing the location of the subject property. B. Narrative submitted by applicant. C. Land Title Survey. D. Site plan. E. Landscape plan. F. Floor plan. G. Exterior elevations plans. H. Photometric plan. I. Architectural renderings. J. Table of project cost. B. STAFF COMMENTS 1. Building. Exterior materials for the office building will be approximately 5% masonry and 95% glazing and metal panels. Exterior materials around the retail building will be changed to masonry and metal panels together with aluminum storefronts and stucco -like exterior finish and insulation systems ("E.I.F.S."). Colors will be selected to tie the office and retail buildings together (color renderings will be provided at Planning Commission meeting). 2. Parking, traffic and sidewalks. There are currently 394 parking spaces provided on site. With the modifications, 443 parking spaces will be provided. Parking is required as follows: The retail building consists of 57,179.67 square feet. 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet gross floor area = 258 spaces required. The office building consists of 45,000 square feet. 1 space per 250 square feet gross floor area = 180 spaces required. 258 retail + 180 office = 438 spaces required. 443 will be provided in accordance with code. The southern most curb cut along West Broadway will be removed. A Hennepin County right-of-way permit is required prior to performing any work within the right-of-way. There will be access from the south parking lot to the main parking lot via a new connection to be constructed as part of the project. In addition, a new covered entry will be constructed on the northwest corner of the office building. The main access drive will be provided with pedestrian sidewalks on both sides connecting the site to the sidewalk along West Broadway. 3. Signs. Sign plans were not submitted with the application. There are two existing ground signs located at the main entrance along West Broadway and at the northwest corner of the property. Building signage for the individual retailers will be standardized with internally lit channel letters. Sign permits are required prior to installing new signage. 4. Landscaping. Landscaping will be provided with 12 shade trees, 27 coniferous shrubs and 243 deciduous shrubs. The landscaping will be installed in landscaped islands throughout the parking area, along the perimeter of the office building and along the side of the building facing Sherburne Ave N. Landscape islands will consist of River Rock. The City Forester has reviewed the landscape plan and recommends the Northern Pin Oaks shown on the plan not be used. Instead, Swamp White Oaks or Bur Oaks shall be installed. Any other type of planting must be pre -approved by the Forester prior to installation. - SITE PLAN REVIEW - CRYSTAL GALLERY- 5502 WEST BROADWAY 2 5. Lighting. A site photometrics plan was submitted and is in compliance with City Code. 6. Utilities. Existing utility connections will be maintained. 7. Surety required: City code requires financial surety for completion of the required site improvements. Typically, the amount of surety is determined based on all of the estimated landscaping cost plus a portion of estimated paving and utilities costs. Staff is recommending that the required surety be $115,000 with $75,000 to be released upon satisfactory completion of the site improvements, $20,000 upon installation of the landscaping, and $20,000 at least one full year after installation of the landscaping. As required by city code, the surety must be in the form of a cash escrow deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit in a form acceptable to the city. C. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the submitted plans for building and parking lot modifications at 5502 West Broadway, subject to the following conditions: A Hennepin County permit is required prior to any work being performed within the West Broadway (County Road 8) right-of-way. 2. A building permit is required prior to the interior and exterior work being performed. A building permit application must be submitted for review and approval prior to any work being done. 3. A sign permit is required prior to installing any signs. 4. Northern Pin Oaks shall not be used for shade trees. Swamp White Oaks or Bur Oaks shall be planted in accordance with the City Forester's recommendation. Any other type of species must be pre -approved by the Forester prior to installation. 6. No building permit shall be issued until the required $115,000 surety and an executed site improvement agreement are provided to the city. Planning Commission action is requested. The City Council would consider the Planning Commission's recommendation at its next meeting on October 21, 2008. SITE PLAN REVIEW - CRYSTAL GALLERY- 5502 WEST BROADWAY 3 Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2008 The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. allilliliall is �.�+r- 6 18 X512 -4, V -� b = s - -_ SSTH AVE M a am - - Z - s u PIT wis — — - a l� NEW am = W Selected Parcel Data Parcel ID: 05-118-21-44-0046 Owner Name: CRYSTAL GALLERY DEVELOPERS Parcel Address: 5502 WEST BROADWAY, CRYSTAL, MN 55428 Property Type: COMMERCIAL -PREF Homestead: NON -HOMESTEAD Area (sgft): 337362 Area (acres): 7.74 A -T -B: BOTH Market Total: $8,000,000.00 Tax Total: $264,422.18 Date Printed: 9/26/2008 1:40:53 PM Current Parcel Date: 9/4/2008 Sale Price: $0.00 Sale Date: / Sale Code: EXHIBIT A http://gis.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx?PID=0511821440046 09/26/2008 WELMAN SPERIDES A r c h i t e c t s MEMORANDUM Date: September 18, 2008 From: Eric A. Reiners, AIA To: City of Crystal Project: Crystal Gallery Mall WSA 07-064 Subject: PROJECT NARRATIVE Copy: Mr. Greg Hayes, Midwest Management, Inc. Mr. Greg Duginski, Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. Project File Attached to this correspondence is the Site Plan Review submittal and application for the City of Crystal. Crystal Gallery Mall is proposing a remodeling and renovation of the interior and exterior of the retail mall and attached 2 -story office building. The proposed renovation is consistent with the current site utilization, existing use, and City Zoning requirements. Crystal Gallery Mall will be remodeled inside and out. The office building will receive new exterior finishes and a new covered entrance with drive -under canopy. The office building interiors will be modified for the existing tenants and set up to receive new medical office users. The retail mall will also receive new exterior finishes and most of the interior mall will be removed with the claimed area being added to the individual retail spaces. Mall retailers will each receive entrances directly from the exterior. Building signage for the individual retailers will be standardized with internally lit channel letters complying with the City signage ordinance. Exterior finishes around the office building will be approximately five percent (5%) masonry and ninety- five percent (95%) glazing and metal panels. Exterior finishes around the retail building will also be changed to masonry and metal panels together with new aluminum storefronts and exterior finish and insulations systems (E.I.F.S.). Colors will be carefully selected to tie the office and retail buildings together creating a uniform consistency across the site. Heating and ventilation requirements are adequately met with the existing rooftop mechanical systems which will be modified to accommodate the interior changes being made though the renovation. The site is approximately 7.74 acres in size and through the course of renovation, will add 49 parking spaces to meet the current zoning requirements while also reducing the total lot coverage by more than 4,000 s.f., or 1.2%. In addition, site circulation has been improved by connecting the south parking lot to the main parking area on the west side of the site. One curb cut onto West Broadway will also be removed. The site can still be accessed from the west off of West Broadway, from the south off of 55th Avenue North, and from the North off of Bass Lake Road. Building waste and recycling will be collected from one point on the site at a location currently used by the existing structure. Existing utility connections will be maintained. 7700 France Ave. S. Suite 375 Edina, MN 55435 phone: (952) 996-9662 fax: (952) 996-96R; - www.wsarch.com EXHIBIT XH'B'T B Also attached to this submittal package are the following items: - Application forms and check for review fees - Property survey prepared by HTPO - Site Plan illustrating proposed work and final site configuration - Landscape Site Plan illustrating proposed landscape work - Building Plans and Elevations - Schematic renderings of building design Project phasing is anticipated to proceed in two parts. First phase will consist of all work in and around the 2 -story office building including parking lot modifications immediately around the office building. The final phase of work will be the retail mall renovation and balance of the parking lot reconfiguration and site improvements. END OF MEMORANDUM 7700 France Ave. S. Suite 375 Edina, MN 55435 phone: (952) 996-9662 fax: (952) 996-9663 www.wsarch.com 1� B A S S L A K E R 0 A D (55th AVE. NORTH) s oar CTANGENT �J-- ' „�— N89 -44'47"E 47,22 ^ F. !.a oe--------- --- =—max .e�.�a----------------- --. t1 °amu I �- 0 �•a\ �� —� Iii I m I LO; \\ I G T I+,� I I 4 I LOT E• I T _1 _JAI I rftlLEGEND '°oJ 4\• ,'a_ Y i\ I I I I i xmt e IRON MONUMENT FOUND\QF� .� : y, I I I »• <� ^ IRm ON MONUMENT TO BE SE ? \, 'o/ T - II t • BDLLARD - 'ep''y� .� I Y — — — E• E W PDWER POLE I I irF LICHT POLE \ $\♦ •\ \\_ I ,. i I 1 • I ; DO GAS VALVE er METER Y`l In WATER VALVE b�9'\ .\ \ <` I I I m 1 d W ' HYDRANT`- WATER MAIN •\ J`\ '\ \\ LOT B '1u �• B Aa / x 0 Y• I Y > O CATCH BASIN -c-GAS UNE I I O MANHOLE T -TELEPHONE LINE \ \ \' '\ t 1 L.1 �'_ li'� Q SIGN —I ` BLDG. HT. (" -E-ELECTRICITY \— I'i ' ® TRANSFORMER \ \ I- a "II 16.4 M MEASURED DISTANCE E� \ I . �+ HANDICAPPED V \ '` \\ ,,�.». ( I I . I I I I �`, I I I I I I I 1 �I TRAFFIC LIGHT �P) PLATTED DISTANCE - % ® TRAFFIC BD% \ '•� 1\ LOT 1.0 a LOT 112 I r- J t \ 1 m TELEPHONE BOX \ w/ s• C II Q t lO T C m h I r ,�' e ELECTRICAL HANDHpLEO � \^ \—\— �L ` i '' `J —14i I I 1 I I O LOT 4II I III ci'i `• I I ,.:�[ �� - �9 \��\\ �' Ii SCHEDULE B -SECTION TWO E%CEPTIONS: O I I t � �'�,�i ----��$-- ^J•''1' w m M , rnno<m m,ntatpapM1<nwewm.mw \ — um Z ' .<. xnw a,r.<r. <I-a<p '�r'sa ' \� ,\ •• .., c._ 1=;�T:-----I :'A. r ..l u L7 --— -- •`sal, o01 a.lenaennammat«matMe. �' — r ma ma.m.n�kmmmnm wwmm. ti \a r \ 1\ " 1 1a. wwrma xa mrcnl ean» mnmt m a,aae. Cn \ I I I j i ' t ,i+ 1:11- \1 a t3. �. a"r,ai w°oearn <r cw»w9 vtiov:°:i bm^�mxwwaooc.m"'epx'rm vesiam \ _. -,-- — — — -- _ — _ _ _ — — — _ i � I •-f•` T 1\1\ 4 33 Temr,. xm nassm laM»eel anaoocumem xa ,swap nwrem)`. m:wt„ \q qa I`"I li'i ' I ( � I 1 u �^ I. \R, is cmwnan m amus. sxwNm.n a tn<ben m \ e6°tD \. ::` r,, t . • < I I ' " I ; '\ . iw �exnel \ int �xmemN 6%Bt 10)5¢x5lexvsctlnbuw aI LOT s I \\; . In x n n« ne Anam •\ \ \ BLDG. HT. 30.3 > I I w`,\ \\ is siws .apn. p Mwrm. mens mrnmem, paammnt xa. • ;x J \ x, fTunenal, mmat m pan.. � � ST sawrammn a<n a.m. me w Dawmem xa m' \N>� '\ . FFE 873.60 - I I I t\ \ b �IN IijLL NOTES: 1 �tl el--aremlest. \ '\ B f/f E- -I - F 2. Tne ba¢Ic N DeaMpa k assumed - f " -..- —E. E. _ F ��/ r/w6• a "M 1. Pumi OeslpnNlms en fes cpnwnkn¢ of relenn« eNY aM eD int mnnM1me an anaBrel r'I �� •r � DII.N ,G eIT•.-•• � $ panmina kpal aaseWron. I 18� I I A xiP I ¢`"`No.p¢ 4\ g g 6. The DwDaM M1aa m a IloD4 xavN zona'X aearemg N IM Fe4enl Enaeganry - - -� -5 ¢T. Vax4 9 — »— - -�'� sR ManapameM Agenry Flppe Irearnn« Rata MaD GDamnuNry Parnl 21.5=11 E. uNee Dslpz2pD4. scala reef L{ nwS69°39'20"W sa 250.60 (M) 250.69 (P) \\ TR o� l� s. zpmna Lemr, aarea parzsma, Hata¢, -ins ann4ws wn•my mmpsm wmp•ranB ene \ 4. 2 N. �/ �. $ o a0 BD t2o �leskrepubameMa' • ^ � ei wS C E-14imenamnc or Mh d4 ere et 9—krM. R T. There are • IoW m ]83 ronlmntli®p peminp spaces arm t1 naneilap ¢paint \ • \ on ^ '1. J !L Bp.O 8 e 1. LOT a. Tne ballons of mmerpnun4 tames an Casetl m rkltl Mu4ma, brarde mepz. ane "ice: BLOCK.. i rna Iwamp¢ mar npt x pwa a .•' r„' `�<':\ C 5 5 Y rra 'J CERTIFICATION: mertanx+ rp. rsunerm/'t. u«nme aw earxevw m the aaae aenanep eetax swxGeri uammre. �� f � tl.« to rwul Wlhry undopert,, xmnawte Gemnl hrtnenm° ('a"nwm�), x¢) xaeaMp 61tsl,y 4 mss is e � �m m+rtu xray wonweehn Wm Tine Msunnn Cemwm f'TNk fcmperry) n atl°wa; Tnn pan m bl t B Mt lart ar la 3 Nora i '¢amn 1. xaerme e ruse mncan Coumr �nkmzo«•Irmo wen ma pne en.n lremapnmwme xortn nnemmalet3 wshin i]a In�wea IN xartnma miner m,eN lot 3 m a pINm w na soum arc IN sine im ] elannt IN Ivm Pe,meaamxnmm,mr.lmle�at3..r<.;wn.wmepa1tnw.IN<nnka.ar.ewmmt„aNmmme a� m„xmm.naa.nla<m,mr. 1. NOG 1.xM iro aeamw emwe<ea whin. tins a, 9, ]0,m 13 Nuri1 •ae Crasu m, m. xermewantw m K .,m,rwnp aotneWttnn,atm New mracore In ue`eli6u gtl1e` Aeman. e. Iw m.n ror <mmr. w inn Inr«mele<eemme pm m+INsm i.x� aowtm a,m. p.etmne moaG)ar.igrt. tinee<°vewruore.:»<o. e`ei�u: [,n rx�..min tx�elwl:��. n'i oar`ee,ner Tran 3: pert m eanr s •c.r m ]. Hamaka none roar aeemm,,anmpm comw. ' m Mrw wes<nv man B inn are menet •na eeermn me en<nwn< amen M1wam«tu ,ue pGt.m <.mw int wrtm np wmtm o�Wq vnnr a uM .mmr. u �n ar r<nm m� .na xemm�� , um &� rnmta. moa wenmr 3. eaG 1. xa. iN melees emm.<apralmr, Tne a A<aato« Iwm sxrwr xe. s1a inn m wmTwa.<.eem,Ntn pae hnnm pn me p.m mmromtm amm sine anm,wwnw, m.m res Gwp. 1nawn e: int «e.m,m im ] NeG t, een w. pnenm memw .�:» m n putt„rM en nk o.mr,mromtne om«mine •pmnrn Tinea aam res mie famn. ALTA Ime prooeM'I. 3oae nrTne rowrty m eammmm.enn Itn,'Tme tarrwnY) eOmml;mem xm iiwep mne imv ]], k map w wM we ens saner on.nan t la aeree ran mese in ewmroen« win tin raaesn one nu° amww • lama Qeu.waw,m ar ra intlw nue unroupn < a Tut T(el ta I—— te, , I SNet »a mroupn is m tmmma m mnwee •v uTA.m xsps ene m.nen m tn. aNe m uua m wm.wn me Rm.uK I ;mem .m„rym0t In mr armna—<wnm. m • Iw wr.rvn. n� ,m m an<ar t< p. Tn Npwnr <mN,xx r.>.es.ww u. ]]niais n:.. Wn rwtt a m.t xN aw a tw.em. ate ox s,wmwmw x«cwrwnv. tnnr wuenen ene,ax,.a m.r rdr w ora unnmte. arc ,m Ll- x.ma I— VICINITY MAP N b 4 (ro w aD) � eAss •xE aaD fig NO TO SCALE SITE J ICO s) RDbtrpRD ND. ALT /ACS LAND TITLE SURVEY CRYSTAL GALLERY MALL LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HRA 3RD ADDMON 11 I Engineering•Surveying a...„ xlciDnc ;1 Landscape Architecture HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON, Inc. rs, essazoolw •asuxo-ren a. pemc MAPFNi EXHIBIT C PROJECT SITE D4TA e�tffe EDSr iTuss Dr. rtv Fav LirDrtr IEi4 dl � _ _ _ ADlNi]NbJ Y 2dIDRTCl12waA 6KOar. j�Jj t-T-E86t4 CQ1'ER']IL FM]T1D niMY Mp 111,mLICY.®N.ID I i£.l_ LISDSi 6f. D]]iMS LDi .M bUa r1Y.r-'IIDO[DHb IID NNDlYvr.ID rF.ID Y�E/D_ IDD) dO Y. '. RTC®LOf '9Frtr Dla , nFvw F4 bb NYDB!laD IOfMM a CCg NOfWP.T v�4NOC¢ Plwac rJan rEnatn•lETu ewrrL_ re erJ� �' ru wA®ree DDn r.mu erg rrac rlcTa rlaasn•rn+E ewr� mwlan 'ncrJCE racrsrxa ri rnFLrAwaDarlry len�a_ mx.es TmaPIanDEPJJs rtawm- Ia�wJm crmEs .P+- r.Era. si," PAIL CRYSTAL GALLERY MEDICAL SUITES r nETAL rr_vEALs E n e N T E N F N i E N 11 ri T E N A N T r nETAL aE.4nL5 mmJ'r@TY vIALL PJ.L^L Ta' r1y5paf �JLL KOG' - - eJaas�o nawnrsr PYLON SIC3N ELEVATION 2 zxe, va• . r -m• I-1 T a N:rstCE ow.E — SPT. BLDG --��5 �'PFKG 50 -- — �• ---' -- - SHERBURNE AVE WELMAN Cppi2 Tn,p Q liwNmwVLL 8[m8 )h rtmNe Gail EK.Pf@ !NT M-0 994Pim WEST IVIANAGGEEMENT, INC. 750 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S. iINP41APOLIS. MN 55426 CRYSTAL GALLERY MALL & OFFICE RENOVATION 5510 W. BROADWAY AVE CRYSTAL, MN 55425 �Ysi�iv,el �� w mn �Nlm su�� Ymn.00.� me l Dm1FA9 ,ILL DAA£ L5512D roR Q Un Sh P,p nEN� Q PlaClµi A A A A 0 A A 0 LEE,J9r IXED E.0 R SITE PLAN Al EXHIBIT D f �o mo - Ot.JO i Ot:7 oWo390 saw Ied�. w�.Rlee TYPIGAL PYLON 51GN PLANTING DETAILS WGSHED RIVER ROCK OVER FA5Ric: FG9Ri G TYPICAL 15LAND PLANTING DETAIL5 YN•.r-m• PLANTING WEL AN 0 03,013 TT -%E 0 L L C e� �RmvEw Pnm c � Pw..Ped ewx ora P.saem MIDWEST IYlANAGENIEN'T, INC. 750 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. S. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425 PRdECE CRYSTAL GALLERY MALL & OFFICE RENOVATION 5510 W. BROADWAY AVE, CRYSTAL• MN 55428 c re vt� I.e.e y a x .�wm v EW[ l RE411I6 !41 IP -OE n_ Z¢E90 Rlrz: 6sRR NOR ,.I�. AOrtE 0.nRfMN A� W.n � p -T IL A A D A A wrz LANDSCAPE PLAN EXHIBIT E b - —o 1 I I I TENAF 1 1tLl`J_[ iL NT 4,809 S.F. SFERMES imam A R C H I T E C T S RASX L L C I G1 I � mimu�E tl � 0 uaa FAI On/ R169FA 6 I TENANT, nT. 1,80S.F. � o.� I TE ANT R3I[7WEST 2 42 S.F. « 7 rENNSOYL MAAVEE& N BMCQIDAPCCJ3.MN55426 E�T 1122S.F., ANT "a — n -O I i nr. CRYSTAL GALLERY MAIL L i i p_ OFFICE T, 83 E ANT S.f. lag[ NOGVATION 2 r« 1 t I 55ICKYnAL,MN555= TE ANT — I e..y w.nry Wt w. p.ti s.�:r 1 12,777 S.F.I YuuJ �bk aJr W 4w of W ds nr. A D %WL L I✓ffiiBa iL o+. "-ss-as a w mrTa — _ — — — —ET EANT I — 2,67 S.F.I T – – V —{ 4le-[e Q art MIE lLW I@v81 II I I I 1 I lJ T- 4F-o –TENANT1,179 S.F. TnT. TENANTTENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENA 2,652 S.F. 2,633 S.F. 2,777 S.F. 2,253 5.L L 10,434 S.F. I 2,224 S.F 2,172 S.F. 2,599 S.F. 2,652 S.F. 2,436 SGp. 667 S.F. _l L 0 V 1,35 S.F. 1 D i 77 masa I I 1 t 1 I nT. nr. nT. nT. I eawacr xo. n.a.L sfaVlrf nT �xoon" nT. TLT nT. ni. N EtECI." nlu.Ea I I nru� �'� r_ L waaoon -� }IlCe � — FLOOR PLAN I I M V FLOOR PLAN G limm A EXHIBIT F QFROPOSED UFST ELEVATION nPROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION `� e=at: env . ro �LJ rAe: inr• . i• -o• FINISH If MATERIALS LEGEND 1 exr .n. wiewa Dane uo�e ffOHlf�lf PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION J e^AE Ini I a TO. G"+ PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION %1PROPOSED NORTHWEST ELEVATION e_.aiE Jnr . i -a �1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION b ^• r: gni• . r -a �i erwe: gni• . r•a LMAN cDT7vMT�,c A A C H I T H C T 8 •»voPeweexwve.e. i�wrnieamsrw saav Ps;a� ecn acs-rs Pwz msa wrrem MIDWEST MANAGEl iENT. INC. 750 Kau MVAMA AVE S. hMM PO>r MN 55426 PHDI6CS. CRYSTAL GALLERY MALL & OFFICE RENOVATION 5510 W. BROADWAY AVE CRYS M4 MN 55428 NY�L� LEE/JF3i E.4R ante MINIM �r ruem EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al EXHIBIT G rm7 PROPOSED EAST ELEVA PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION L eras E: ini• . r -o• l � Cp N FINISH E MATERIALS LEGEND ext Itl. I461®61L CS7OR IY11Fb /1 ENLAt•�sED PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION At -0 _ UT A R C 8 IT B C T S Ave.a ��.mimmmsarw a..av P� o� Psi m PAZ y� Pse.sev T*MWF•ST MANAGEMENT, TSC. 750 PEZOMMVANIA AVE. S. M0414EAPOUSS. MN 55626 Peal0.T: CPlYSTAF GALLMY MALL & OFFICS RENOVATION 5510 W. BROADWAY AVE CRYSTAL MN 55628 LLa„1 4ele.e6 uJa tY V. ! W �[ 1 PIDI�S W e+. e-to-oe w m»e o-ie-ce � art art P✓N tars' 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 A A A 0 0 M. 4 ttE/.H£ ce i� E.1R SSI} ear ILL1R: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4 CRYSTAL GALLERY MALL 5502 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE Luminaire Schedule L 4 Y Y 4 r L a L L L L L L L L L L L L Y L L r 1 r Y u y L L Y y r y r Y IL - r ect. Cr std Ewller MCD L L L L L L L L L LI 4 4 4 L L L L b b 4 b 4 L L L L L L 4 L y Y 4 Y r L L r 4 L y Y 4 wd at, Lobel Arran mt n Lunens LLE Desm tbn 4 r y 4 y y y 4 4 r L 4 4 3310D D.720 (GE Decl—d Series !W Wltt NH Type III Dlst 3DFt Pole — aft Bose 4 I BADN-BACK 1331DD C.— IU Decoshkltl Serles AW Vett NN Tl- III Dist Double Head 3DFt Pole on 31: Q J 33 CC SINGLE e5W 0.720— 61n 1W xe tt NH ppenllpht 4 4 13 DD SINGLE BSW 0.'r20 L.11 a 600 Smles -11 Elxtur. IW wutt IMI Mttl pt 15it Numeric Suronary 11 Pro [t� Ail Pro ctv Label I_Type Units Avg Max HM Avp/Hin Mux/Nin DdCPts I Illunlnonce Fc I L50 1 7.2 D.D pD0 D.W PHDTDMETRIC PLAN D.1 - EXHIBIT H L 4 Y Y 4 r L a L L L L L L L L L L L L Y L L r 1 r Y u y L L Y y r y r Y IL L r Y a Y L L L L L L L L L LI 4 4 4 L L L L b b 4 b 4 L L L L L L 4 L y Y 4 Y r L L r 4 L y Y 4 4 Y L y L L L b y L b y L 4 L L L L YI b L L 4 r y 4 y y y 4 4 r L 4 4 y b Y Y a b 4 y y r O Y 4 I Y 4 Y L L L L L y 4• r L L L L L y L L f• Y YY L L L L L L L 4 4 4 4 L L 4 4 y L L L L L y 4 L L L L L L L L L b L r L L U-9— f 4L L a L a 4 L y L Y L L b Y L 4 4 Y L 4 r 4 6 Y 4 L L L b L L a b L L L L L 4 a L L Le L L b L b L L L Y L r L 4 L L L y b b 4 4 L b a L Y L L L L L b b L L b 4 4 4 Y 4 y L L y L L L L L L y L a L 4 L 4 y L L b L L 4 y L L L L 4 r L y L 4 L L 4 L L 4 b L Y t• Y L L L L t 4 L 4 L L Y Y L 4 L y L b L L L L L 1• y l+ L b L L b L L L b 4 4 L L L L b L L L 4 u L L L L L L 4 L L L 4 4 y L y 4 y L L L L L y y Y Y b L y r L L y 4 L L L b L 4 4 y H I t L 4 L L L y b L Y L b 4 1 y y r/ L L y 4 y L L L L L 4 L L L L 4 1 4 L L L L L f• r L L y L L L 4 4 Y L L L L L b L 4 L L L y a 4 b b L L t• L o y L L L 4 i� 4 L L .aL 1 L L L L L L b L y L b L L Y L L L b • b L b b L L -.. g''£ Y�t,1 L 4 4 4 4 .•� r 4 r L L L L L L y L L 1+ L y y L 4 4 4 4 L L b L L L L L L y L L L L L L L L L L L L 4 L L+ 4 4 4 4 L L o a L 4 y L Y L b L Y t• b L L L Y L L b L L L 4 L L 4 L L L L L L Y L L L y L b r 4 4 Y L L y L t+ L L L L L L y L b L L y L y L L r L y L L L 4 4 b y a 4 y L L L Y L a r L L Y L y L 4 4 4 r L 4 L L L r L r Y L r Y L b Y b a L y PHDTDMETRIC PLAN D.1 - EXHIBIT H L 4 Y Y 4 r L a L L L L L L L L L L y L L b b L L Y L b L b b L Y u y L L Y y r y r Y IL L L L L L L L L L L LI 4 4 4 L L L L b b 4 b 4 L L L L L L 4 4 y r Y Y y L y Y 4 4 Y L y L L L b y L b y L 4 L L L L YI b L L Y a 4 1• L b y y L 4 4 a 4 Y L L L 4 L Y 1 4 L 1• L uL Y LI L L 4 4 y L Y L L L L L y 4• r L L L L L y L L f• L y L L L L L L L 4 4 4 4 L L 4 4 y L L L L L y 4 L L L L L L L L L b L r L L U-9— f 4L L a L a 4 4 L L L L L b ©L L L Y L L L L L L L L L L L y L L b L L 4 y L L L L 4 r L y L 4 L 4 Y 4 L L 4 L L Y Y L 4 L L L L L L u L L L L L L L L v L L 1• L L b L L L t+ L L L L L L L 4 4 L L L r y L L L b L L 4 L L L L b b L L b r L L b b L L -Am-4 b b y b L y y L 1 4 L L Y Y L L \ L L L >gP�4�4 L 4 4 L L L L H I t Y L L 4 b 4 Y y y L L L L L r L L z3uy3m 4 L L L L Y L 4 L 4 L b • *` _ t L L l+ L L L L L L b • b L b b L L -.. g''£ Y�t,1 L Y L L L L �£ „t L L L L L L L 4 y r L L Y I L yI a r y L -u—u 4 L L L L L Z 4 b L 4 y b L 1 L y L L L L L L L L L L r L b Y 4 Y L L t L L y Y L L L L L L L b b L L L y y L Y L L L L L L L L 4 U L \+ 4 L 4 Y1I L Y 4 4 Y L 4 4 L L L Y y L L y y L L 4 4 lr L L L L+ b b L 4 4 L Y L{ ? L 4 4 L Y L L Y 4 L V y f L L 1 • b b L L L 4 L L L L 4 4 1 4 L iI£ j y y Y L L • L L L L L 4 4 - y 4 q + 1 4 L L b 11 Y u L Y b L t Q L L 4 14 L L L 4 L 1r • 1 Z L Y A12,1 +' X,' ElJ L lr L Y 2 4 L L L L L y k ft5 t ( 4 ~g,Y `• ,fin K ``5 f - Y 4 a L L L L L Y L b L i L l L 3 �` C€ L I L L L L �• 3 „„ _ g � 4 L L 4 L > Y 4 Y L Y PTR ,�y P, R! 36 ,£+� qq v L L Y L L Y Y O b L L L y 4 L L 4 L L L 4 4 L L L y L y r 4 4 L 4 4 L L y L 4 L Y 4 Y Y 4 4 L t 4 4 4 L Y 4 4 L b L L L 4 Y •� Y 4 u r r r u 1• r L L b r L L L r Y 4 4 4 b 4 Y L Y L 4 Y y y 4 L L ", -" "� L Y Y 4 4 Y Y Y 4 L 4 4 L Y L 4 L 4 L_. 4 Y 4 L a Y Y Y Y Y Y 4®L L L L I L L L L a L -- 4 Y u 4 4 Y y t• r Y L Y 4 6— 1. Y L Y Y Y Y L Y b L 4 Y L 4 4 4 y L Y 4 y 4 Y P L L L 4 Y Y Y 4 Y 4 Y 4 1• L r L Y y 4 y Y Y 4 Y 4 Y r 4 I. t• I. L L L L L 4 4 4 L L Y 4 y 4 4 4 r 4 4 r 4 4 Y 4 L 4 L 4 4 4 r 4 4 y 4 L L Y L Y Y L y b b 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Y Y a u Y 4 L 4 Y Y Y y b L L b y L b L L L L Y Y 4 • 4 Y L Y 4 Y Y 4 Y L y L L L L+ L 4 L L L Y L L y 4 4 4 PHDTDMETRIC PLAN D.1 - EXHIBIT H CRYSTAL GALLERY MALL CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 WFLM,AN SPERIDES ARCHITECT'S EXHIBIT 1 CRYSTAL GALLERY MALL CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA SFFIEMBER I6, 2008 WFI MAN SPERIDES ARCHITECTS CRYSTAL GALLERY MALL CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA SEP'lEMBER 16. 2003 WFL:MAN SPERIDFS ARC HI If:C.fS TABLE OF PROJECT COST JTY CRYSTAL for certain types of applications for Special Land Use Actions TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT.- Address PPLICANT. Address of Subject Property: '5, V . MADWAI Mk - Description or Name of Project: CQ5W, LJJWj M&L (A T Vo $152, 4t Engineering, Architectural and Legal Expenses Site Preparation (grading, filling, tree removal) Utilities (water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer) Streets, Sidewalks, Parking (and other paved areas) Other Site Improvements (lighting) Construction of Buildings (materials and labor) TOTAL PROJECT COST (not including landscaping) If the total project cost is Below $1,000,000 From $1,000,001 to $2,000,000 From $2,000,001 to $3,000,000 From $3,000,001 to $4,000,000 Over $4,000,000 Then the minimum landscaping value is... 2% of the total project cost $20,000 + 1 % of total project cost in excess of $1,000,000 $30,000 + 0.75% of total project cost in excess of $2,000,000 $37,500 + 0.25% of total project cost in excess of $3,000,000 1 % of total project cost $S1 4 1-7 � Landscaping (must meet the minimum value above) (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) APPLICATION #: SURETY REQUIRED: $ 0 $ 0 $ $ yo(oz' n ------------------ $ 11 5'1000 TOTAL SURETY REQUIRED EXHIBIT J DATE: October 6, 2008 TO: Planning Commission (October 13th meeting) FROM: Patrick A. Peters, Community Development Director,, SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Application 2008-12 for text amendments to Section 510 of the City Code (Park Dedication) A. BACKGROUND The summary of the 2007 financial audit for the city contained two legal compliance findings, one of which related to park dedication fees that may be collected as part of the subdivision of land. Specifically, the city's fee schedule currently has a flat fee of $1,000 per dwelling unit for cash payment in lieu of park dedication for residential subdivisions. This $1,000 fee is contrary to city code provisions governing the establishment of such fees, in that the cash payment is to be based on the fair market value of the land. The City Council adopted an amended fee schedule for 2009 at its October 7 meeting to rectify this inconsistency in the fee schedule (excerpt of adopted 2009 fee schedule attached as Exhibit A). The next step is to ensure that the provisions of Section 510 are consistent with park dedication language in Minnesota Statutes. The city attorney has recommended changes to Section 510 to provide that the calculation of cash payments in lieu of dedication be on a per lot basis ner Minnesota Statutes and not a per dwelling unit basis as is currently in city code. Staff also is recommending code language to clarify how cash payment in lieu of park dedication is to be calculated. Finally, the proposed ordinance includes non -substantive changes that align the city's park dedication provisions with Minnesota Statutes. E. STAFF COMMENTS Adoption of the proposed ordinance (Exhibit B) would result in the following changes: 1. The cash payment in lieu of dedication is proposed to be calculated at 5% of market value. This replaces the 10% currently in the ordinance, which may not satisfy the nexus requirement in Statutes that states in part, "The fee or dedication must bear a rough proportionality to the need created by the proposed subdivision or development." Staff is of the opinion that the 5% better satisfies this statutory requirement, particularly in light of the fact that Crystal is a fully developed community with clearly defined park, open space and recreational systems, capacities and needs. TEXT AMENDMENT - CITY CODE SECTION 510, PARK DEDICATION PAGE 1 OF 2 2. To ensure consistency with Statutes, the cash payment amount is proposed to be calculated using the number of lots in the proposed subdivision instead of the number of dwelling units. 3. To ensure consistency with Statutes, in instances where the resubdivision of previously subdivided property results in an increased number of lots, the park dedication fee will apply only to the net increase in lots. 4. Minnesota Statutes require the City "give due consideration to the open space, recreational, or common areas and facilities open to the public that the applicant proposes to reserve for the subdivision." Although city code currently allows credit for private open space, this due consideration for public open space is not mentioned; so language has been added to that effect. 5. A definition of "buildable land" is required by Statutes, so it is proposed to be added to Section 510. This definition establishes a standard the city can use to determine the amount and suitability of land proposed for dedication for park or open space use within a subdivision. C. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission action on the proposed ordinance is requested. The City Council will consider the Planning Commission's recommendation at its meeting on October 21, 2008. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Post on October 2, 2008. TEXT AMENDMENT - CITY CODE SECTION 510, PARK DEDICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 N Proposed City of Crystal 2009 l=ee Schedule - Exclusive of the Utility Section Q O G.\Charlie\Fee Schedules [Fee 09 drea.xis12009 Run Date: 10/03/00 Housing City Code JDE Account Rental license fee - duplexes 1 year 65.001unit 75.00/unit 75.00/unit Percent Dept. Type Number Code Description Expires 2007 Fee 2008 Fee 2009 Fee Increase ommenl Housing Certificate 0100.4280 Point of sale inspections - duplexes 1 year 135.00 0.00 1 .00 0.o0 % expires 1 year from date of issuance Housing Certificate 0100.4280 Point of sale Inspections - duplexes - after hours surcharge Rental license fee - five units and over 67.50 75.00 75.00 0.00% expires 1 year from date of Issuance Housing Certificate 0100.4280 Point of sale inspections - single family 1 year 120.00 125.00 125.00 0.00% expires 1 year from date of Issuance Housing Certificate 0100.4280 Point of sale inspections - single family - after hours surcharge 1 year 60.00 60.00 60.00 0.00% expires 1 year from date of Issuance Housing Certificate 0100.4280 Point of sale reinspection fee -single family & duplexes 1 year 50.00 50.00 50.00 0.00% expires 1 year from date of issuance Housing Certificate 0100.4280 Administrative fee on refund of application fee Administrative fee on refund of application fee 20% of application fee Housing License 0100.4285 Rental license fee - duplexes 1 year 65.001unit 75.00/unit 75.00/unit 15.38% expires 1 year from date of issuance Housing License 0100.4285 Rental license fee - triplexes 1 year 175.00 175.00 expires 1 year from date of Issuance Housing License 0100.4285 Rental license fee - four plexes 1 year 200.00 200.00 expires 1 year from date of issuance Housing License 0100.4285 Rental license fee - five units and over 1 year 125.00 200.00 ' 200.00 0.00% per building + $7 per unit Housing License 0100,4285 Rental license fee - late fee/ penalty 1 X applicable license fee Housing License 0100.4285 Rental license fee - single family homes 1 year 125.00 125.00 125.00 0.00% Housing License 0100.4285 Rental license fee - suspended license reinstatement fee 75.00 Housing License 0100.4285 Administrative fee on refund of application fee 20% of application fee Housing Other 0100.4285 Rental reinspection fees - duplexes, triplexes 50.00 50.00 50.00 0.00% Housing Other 0100.4285 Rental reinspection fees - multiples 60.00 60.00 60.00 0.00% per building + $3 per unit Housing Other 0100.4285 Rental reinspection fees - single family homes 50.00 50.00 50.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Administrative appeal 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Application fee - telecommunication lowers 3,600.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Comprehensive Plan amendment 300.00 350.00 350.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4430 Comprehensive Plan - copy of 32.00 35.00 35.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Conditional use 6 mo. 300.00 350.00 350.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Environmental assessment worksheet 2,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Flood plain / wetland alteration 500.00 500.00 500.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Lot division/combination 6 mo. 300.00 350.00 350.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Planned unit develop. (incl. fees for rezoning, site plan review & variance) 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00% lanning Other 0100.4418 Plat 300.00 350.00 350.00 0.00% + $50 per lot over 2 Planning Other 0405.4945 Park dedication - residential plat 1,000.00 1,000.00 varies based on fair market value per City Code Section 510 Planning Other 0405.4945 Park dedication - commerical & Industrial plat 1,000.00 1,000.00 varies based on fair market value per City Code Section 510 Planning Other 0100.4418 Rezoning 300.00 350.00 350.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Site plan review 300.00 350.00 350.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Vacations 300.00 350.00 350.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4418 Variance 300.00 350.00 350.00 0.00% Planning Other 0100.4430 Zoning book 35.00 35.00 35.00 0.00% Pay 21 CITY OF CRYSTAL ORDINANCE #2008 - AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PARK DEDICATION AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 510 The City of Crystal Does Ordain: Section 1. Crystal City Code, Section 510 is hereby amended as follows: 510.01. Dedication required. As a eenditieH of approval of any „1^*, reps* subdivisien, or- lot A reasonable portion of the buildable land to be divided must be dedicated to the public or preserved for public use as parks, playgrounds, trails, or open space. "Buildable land" means the gross acreage of all property in the proposed plat or subdivision excluding wetlands designated by federal or state agencies, wetlands classified by the Wetland Conservation Act, as amended, state or county rights of way, and steep slopes as defined by the zoning ordinance. This requirement applies to plats, r-eplgs, subdivisions, or lot divisions that (i) create at least one additional lot , or (ii) combine lots for the purpose of development involving changed or mixed land uses or the intensification of uses, or (iii) consist of a planned unit development as defined and regulated by the zoning code. The dedication requirements are not satisfied if the city reasonably determines that the land proposed for dedication is unsuitable for public recreational use. The dedication required by this section is in addition to dedication required for streets, roads, utilities, storm water ponding areas, or similar utilities and improvements. Previously subdivided property from which a park dedication has been received, being resubdivided with the same number of lots, is exempt from park dedication requirements. If, as a result of subdividing the property, the number of lots is increased, then the park dedication fee applies only to the net increase of lots. 510.03. Amount required. The amount of land required for dedication is based upon the gess 1^rd- ^re^ to be subd vi& buildable land area and equals the land the city reasonably finds it will need to acquire for park or other recreational purposes as a result of approval of the land division. Generally, 10% of the gfess buildable land area to be subdivided must be dedicated for residential subdivisions and 5% for commercial and industrial subdivisions. 510.05. Cash payment in lieu of dedication. The city may require a cash payment in lieu of land dedication. In determining to require payment or dedication, the council will consider such factors as whether tie park land is needed in the proposed location, whether the proposed dedication is suitable for the intended use, and whether a cash payment would be more beneficial to development of the entire park system. 510.07. Amount of cash payment. The cash payment in lieu of dedication is determined by the fair market value of the undivided buildable land as determined by the city Assessor at the time of final plat approval, including the value added by existing utilities, streets and other public improvements serving the property but excluding the value added by all other existing 340468v1 LKT CR205-30 EXHIBIT B improvements to the land. The amount of the cash payment is 4@tag..,;ro,a 4Y app!54 g the app-,.rf4ate per-eentage sta4ed ; s4seetio,, 510.03 to t4e shall be 5% of the fair market value as determined by the assessor. The maximum cash payment is for each a« elling • ig-- loot in residential subdivisions and for each acre in commercial and industrial subdivisions i-& as set out in the fee schedule. (Amended, Ord. 2006-08, Sec. 1) 510.09. Park and open space fund. Cash payments in lieu of dedication are payable no later than at the time of final subdivision approval. The payment must be placed in a special fund established by the city to be used solely for the purposes of acquisition or and development or improvement of parks, playgrounds, trails, or open space. 510.11. Partial dedication. The City may accept a dedication of land in an amount less than that specified in subsection 510.03 and require a cash payment equivalent to the balance of the dedication requirement. The partial cash payment is determined by subtracting the percentage of land actually dedicated from the percentage of land required to be dedicated under subsection 510.03, and applying the resulting percentage to the fair market value of the pFepesOd : i 41, is i buildable land. 510.13. Credit for private land. A credit of up to 25% of the dedication requirements may be awarded for park and open space that is to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the subdivision. A credit will not be awarded unless the following conditions are met: a) private open space may not be occupied by nonrecreational buildings and must be available for the use of all the residents of the proposed subdivision; b) required building setbacks will not be included in computation of private open spaces; C) use of the private open space must be restricted for park, playground, trail, or open space purposes by recorded covenants that (i) run with the land in favor of future owners of property within the subdivision and (ii) cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent of the city council; d) the private open space will be of a size, shape, location, topography, and useability for park or recreational purposes, or contain unique features which are important to be preserved; and e) the private open space must reduce the demand for public recreational facilities or public open space occasioned by development of the subdivision. 510.15. In establishing the portion to be dedicated or preserved, or the cash fee in lieu thereof, the City shall give due consideration to the open space, recreational, or common areas and facilities open to the public that the applicant proposes to reserve in the subdivision. 340468v1 LKT CR205-30 Section 2. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Crystal City Code, subsection 110.11. First Reading: Second Reading and Adoption: Publication: , 2008 Effective Date: , 2008 ATTEST: Janet Lewis, City Clerk 340468v1 LKT CR205-30 11: 11: ReNae J. Bowman, Mayor HEWO RAN DMAJ DATE: October 8, 2008 TO: Planning Commission (October 13th meeting) FROM: Jason Zimmermann, Code Enforcement and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Application 2008-13 for a Variance to allow an accessory building to be built closer to the street than the principal structure at 4552 Brunswick Ave N. � f(t7:ZKH►1�� The applicant intends to build a detached garage between the existing house and 46th Ave N. Based on plans submitted by the applicant, the garage would be 576 square feet and be located 8 feet from the north property line along 46th Avenue. City code requires that any detached accessory building be set back from any lot line along a street at least as much as the principal building (the existing house), which in this particular case is set back 55 feet from the north lot line along 46th Avenue. If the application is approved, the minimum setback requirement from the north lot line along 46 h Avenue would be reduced from 55 feet to 8 feet for detached buildings on the subject property. Because the proposed garage would be located closer to the street than the house, the garage cannot be built unless a variance is granted to allow it to be located closer to the street. The applicant has applied for such a variance. Notice of the October 13, 2008 public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property on October 2, 2008. The following Exhibits are attached: A. 2006 aerial photo showing the location of the property. B. Narrative and site sketch submitted by applicant. C. Site Plan. B. STAFF COMMENTS/SUGGESTED FINDINGS OF FACT In order for a variance to be granted, state law and city code require that all three of the following criteria be met: The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used as required by the code. VARIANCE - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE - 4552 BRUNSWICK AVE N PAGE 1 OF 2 The property can be put to reasonable use if used as required by the code. There is more than enough space on the lot to construct the proposed garage east of the house in accordance with City code. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the property owner. The property is not unique in its size or shape that would prohibit the ;applicant from constructing the proposed garage east of the house in accordance with City Code. ■ The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. If allowed to be built as proposed, the detached garage would alter the essential character or the locality. There are no other detached structures in the vicinity that are located so close to the street. The garage would look out of place in its proposed location. In addition, state law and city code specifically state that economic considerations alone do not constitute an undue hardship if a reasonable use for the property exists under the code. C. RECOMMENDATION Deny the requested variance from Section 515.33 Subd. 3 f) 1) to allow a detached accessory structure to be located closer to an abutting street than the principal structure. Suggested findings of fact are as articulated in Section S above. Planning Commission action is requested. Findings of fact addressing whether or not the three variance criteria are met should be included in the motion. The Planning Commission may choose to use staff's recommended findings of fact by reference in the motion. City Council would consider this variance request and the Planning Commission's recommendation on October 21, 2008. VARIANCE - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE - 4552 BRUNSWICK AVE N PAGE 2 OF 2 Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County Property leap - Tax Year: 2008 The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only, Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. W 9M Selected Parcel Data Parcel ID: 09-118-21-33-0109 Owner Name: GARY ANKERFELT Parcel Address: 4552 BRUNSWICK AVE N , CRYSTAL, MN 55422 Property Type: RESIDENTIAL Homestead: HOMESTEAD Area (sgft): 13840 Area (acres): 0.32 A -T -B: ABSTRACT Market Total: $153,000.00 Tax Total: $1,700.22 Date Printed: 10/7/2008 7:57:35 AM Current Parcel Date: 10/3/2008 Sale Price: $80,000.00 Sale Date: 02/2008 Sale Code: WARRANTY DEED EXHIBIT A http://gis. co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx?PID=09118213 30109 10/07/2008 a `l w .n -1_>VL It imp r EXHIBIT B { % ` t"\ _.L-� °-g ----- --- -1_>VL It imp r EXHIBIT B z- -------------------- -- -- -- ►�- �,� ? _mss -�- - --- ----- --- � dd. i CJ V p t; -- '� C w + 'l� t xit 1 m z y 1 1 CVA-PJWQE i2Eau ( aEv� I it : pro ' M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 8, 2008 TO: Planning Commission (for October 13, 2008 meeting) FROM: John Sutter, City Planner/Assistant Community Development Director SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the 2008 Update of the Crystal Comprehensive Plan. [Continued from September 8, 2008 meeting.] Enclosed please find the following revised pages to the staff draft of the 2008 Update of the Crystal Comprehensive Plan. (The staff draft had been provided to you prior to the September 8, 2008 meeting.) These revised pages supplant the corresponding page from the staff draft. PAGE DESCRIPTION 28 Figure F-7 44 Figure H-3 45 Figure H-4 56 Figure 1-1 57 Figure 1-2 66 Figure J-1 67 Figure J-2 78 Figure K-1 79 Figure K-2 85 Figure L-1 107 Figure N-8 109 Figure N-10 The following revised pages will be handed out at the October 13, 2008 meeting: PAGE DESCRIPTION 20 Figure F-1 21 Figure F-2 At this time, staff suggests that the Planning Commission open the public hearing, take public comment, and consider a motion approving the Planning Commission draft of the 2008 Update of the Crystal Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission draft would be comprised of the staff draft as revised with the new pages listed above, unless the motion specifies otherwise. The Planning Commission draft would then be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration and approval. Planning Commission action is requested. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PAGE 1 OF 1 FIGURE F-7 SOUTHEAST QUADRANT: FUTURE LAND USE MAP CURRENT VERSION AVE FAIR Magnet School I 36TH AVE 34TH AVE 32ND AVE w O U J LU UNS 2000 Airport 0 GC 0 HDR 0 I LDR ® LDR/Park 0 MDR 0 MU -Town Center 0 MU-WB/81 0 NC Park RAIL - PUBLIC -INSTITUTIONAL MNDOT-HWY 100 LAND Other Undev (LDR) Low Density Residential 36TH AVE W O m so w O Z 34TH AVE .11 A Southeast 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 Miles Quadrant " 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 28 OF 118 0 a SOUTHEAST QUADRANT: FUTURE LAND USE MAP CURRENT VERSION AVE FAIR Magnet School I 36TH AVE 34TH AVE 32ND AVE w O U J LU UNS 2000 Airport 0 GC 0 HDR 0 I LDR ® LDR/Park 0 MDR 0 MU -Town Center 0 MU-WB/81 0 NC Park RAIL - PUBLIC -INSTITUTIONAL MNDOT-HWY 100 LAND Other Undev (LDR) Low Density Residential 36TH AVE W O m so w O Z 34TH AVE .11 A Southeast 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 Miles Quadrant " 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 28 OF 118 FIGURE H-3 0 South Quadrant POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AREAS SOUTHWEST QUADRANT 45TH AVE 15 42ND AVE =L _ AVE $ 17 LU z z_ 32ND AVE z a cn 0 w cn a 38TH AVE 19 34TH AVE w 0 218- 0 LLI o N 30TH AVE 0- 0 0 1000 2000 Feet 27TH AVE 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 44 OF 118 FIGURE H-4 POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AREAS SOUTHEAST QUADRANT W O U J W 42ND AV 3 \ E 0 15 FAI� Magnet School [16: 21 36TH AVE 19 2 O J 34TH AVE � 32ND AVE :22 36TH A z W W J W 00 O z 34TH AVE 21 I x�� 1000 2000 Feet 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 45 OF 118 FIGURE I-1 ROADWAY JURISDICTION NORTHWEST QUADRANT Northwest Quadrant IMPLEMENT Un -Designate 62nd East of Louisiana IMPLEMENT Add Designation 58th W. Broadway to Elmhurst IMPLEMENT Un -Designate Elmhurst/ IMPLEMENT Hampshire, N. of 58th Add Designation 58th W. Broadway to Sumter Z IMPLEMENT > Add Designation Sumter 56th to 58th I s IMPLEMENT Add Designation 54th Ave East of Nevada & Nevada 54th to 56th IMPLEMENT Un -Designate Louisiana Fairview to 56th Ave. 295 IMPLEM ENT ' Un -Designate Hampshire 47th to Fairview Ave. gges nges Q ADD DESIGNATION ® UN -DESIGNATE 2005 Average Annual Road Class: Daily Traffic Volumes State Trunk Highway NCounty State Aid Highwa j (Shown for Segments > 1000) /Municipal State Aid Ste Crystal Local Streets Others Local Streets " 0 02 04 MlF G 9GF IMPLEMENT Un -Designate 53rd E. of Louisiana A' 60T �F S T- 2008 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 56 OF 118 00- FIGURE I-2 60TH AVE N ROADWAY JURISDICTION NORTHEAST QUADRANT "tupok-,N +m 13900 IM:iI 0 Northeast Quadrant IMPLEMENT Add Designation 58th Orchard to Regent 58TH AVE N IMPLEMENT Add Designation Regent 56th to 58th Suggested MSA Changes Q ADD DESIGNATION ® UN -DESIGNATE Road Class: State Trunk Highway NCounty StateAid Highway NMunicipal State Aid Street Crystal Local Streets Others Local Streets Daily Traffic Volumes (Shown for Segments > 1000) 0 02 0.4 Ml� 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 57 OF 118 FIGURE J-1 ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION NORTHWEST QUADRANT Z LU Q aaQ N Y H LU z z 56th Ave Bass Lk Rd (CSAH 10) Widen, add a median and left turn lanes? (Too much volume for current configuration.) Key: Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Other Local Streets 2005 Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes (Shown for Segments >1000) 58 HAVEN ! Ll 29 _..22300 O O M 5TH AVE N 54th AVE N I \. O Douglas Drive (CSAH 102) N Re -stripe to 3 lanes? A (Center left turn lane + 1 lane each way.) 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Q— Q 2050 FAIRVI4 1 1 140 1 47TH AVE N I 9 0 T 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 66 OF 118 FIGURE J-2 ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION NORTHEAST QUADRANT 58TH AVE N Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Other Local Streets 1.005 Average Annual )aily Traffic Volumes Shown for Segments >1000) N 1 0 0.25 0.5 Miles 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 67 OF 118 FIGURE K-1 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NORTHWEST QUADRANT Northwest Quadrant Y H W Z Z Sidewalks: N Existing Sidewalks(2007) N Priority 1 - Sidewalks Needed Along Currently Designated MSA or!,C my F Priority 2 - Sidewalks Needed Along Other Routes Not Currently desi nates Priority 3 - Additional Sidewalks Desired if Funding Allows Possible Regional Trail N Trails to Be Added as Part of CSAH81 Reconstruction Safet) A ' Trails (2007) CCC/1 Bike Lanes at DOL Existing Shoulder Bike Lanes Potential Shoulder Bike Lanes Due to Road Re -Striping and Reconstruction A 0 500 1000 1500 Feet 51c 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 78 OF 118 FIGURE K-2 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NORTHEAST QUADRANT '� --------------------------------------------------- 0 Northeast i Quadrant i AVE c Ped/Bike Bridge i over CSAH 81 & 58TH AVE MBotfttineauTransitway? wZ trill _01 W, 51ST P c� 0 A 0 500 1000 1500 Feet i Sidewalks: N Existing Sidewalks(20M NFrbdty 1 -Sidewalks Needed Along Cirreity Designated MSA or County Routes Priority 2- Sidewalks Needed Along Other Rates NotCunrenly Designated Nw Priority 3-AdditionalSidewaiks Desired if Funding Allows - Possible Regional Tral IN Trails to Be Added as Part d CSAH81 Reconstruction � Trails (2007) F'4 e' ones Existing Shoulder Bike Lanes �..� Potential Shoulder Bike Lanes Due to Road Re -Striping and Reconstruction 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 79 OF 118 FIGURE L-1 PUBLIC TRANSIT z EXISTING METRO TRANSIT ROUTES 14 715 716 721 POTENTIAL NORTHWEST/BOTTINEAU N 755 758 764 767 TRANSITWAY & STATIONS 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 85 OF 118 V Likely Station at 63rd Ave. --.-.. (Brooklyn Park) -- .. 764 715 767 TH AVE N 70 a)TH AVEN 11 721 AVEN Likely Station at Bass Lake Road 7w Em 3 n1 � N H L D V 90 a� CCR LI Ain TTTT 755 Possble Station 6RV1 t` at 48th Avenue 47TH AVEN a n m m m 716 z Likely Station at 7Y Hibbard Marketplace 764 - 715 (Robbinsdale) 42ND AV 755 ift scale Hann Cents. a z 764 Alignment to Downtown Mpls. is Undetermined z 75 a .w u z z EXISTING METRO TRANSIT ROUTES 14 715 716 721 POTENTIAL NORTHWEST/BOTTINEAU N 755 758 764 767 TRANSITWAY & STATIONS 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 85 OF 118 FIGURE N-8 NORTHWEST QUADRANT - PLANNED UNLTIMATE PARKS AND TRAIL SYSTEM Northwest Quadrant ffl]", 41Y I— W Z Z E Planned Ultima A/ Existing & Planrn Existing & Plann Existing & Plann City Limits 0 500 1000 1500 F 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 1011312008 - PAGE 107 OF 118 FIGURE N-10 A OS v� J O 0 i NORTHEAST QUADRANT PLANNED UNLTIMATE PARKS AND TRAIL SYSTEM I --------------------- Northeast Quadrant I M' " _Park/Wild rea I I I I U Lions Soo Line { I ana#-h j I I Twin Lake Shore* N Av 1 O 500 1000 1500 Feet Planned Ultimate System A/ Existing & Planned Sidewalks Existing & Planned Bike Lanes Existing & Planned Multi Use Paths V/ City Limits 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/1312008 - PAGE 109 OF 118 PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL - STATUS Or PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SPECIAL LAND USE APPLICATIONS: 1. Cornerstone Church (3420 Nevada) - Conditional Use Permit for multiple institutional uses. On March 18, 2008, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for Lionsgate Academy, a public charter school focusing on students with autism, to lease a substantial portion of the Cornerstone Church (Olivet Baptist Church) building. This approval also included other continuing uses such as Happy Time Preschool and St. David's Early Childhood Development. In fall 2008, new parking lot striping, signage and other items must be completed to comply with the city's conditions of approval. 2. 5629 West Broadway (Arby's). On May 6, 2008, the City Council denied a requested variance to reduce the front setback from 30 feet to 16 feet, but approved an alternate variance to reduce the front setback from 30 feet to 19 feet for the purpose of allowing Arby's to remodel their store and add their new standard front `pinnacle' element. Construction is underway. 3. 5400 Corvallis (Cavanagh School). On May 20, 2008, the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit and site plan governing multiple uses within a former elementary school building. i ne first phase of site improvements has been completes except for the trash enclosure and tree planting. The second phase will occur sometime in 2009-2011 concurrent with the reconstruction of CSAH 81 / Bottineau Blvd. It will include a new short-term parking area near the southwest corner of the building, as well as other site work related to the county road project. 4. 5430 Douglas Dr (MAR Properties/Steen Engineering). On August 19, 2008, the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit and first reading of an ordinance rezoning this property from Commercial Planned Development to 1-1 Light Industrial. Second reading of the rezoning ordinance was scheduled for September 2, 2008. The project will change the principal use of this largely -vacant building from offices to storage units for individual rental. Steen Engineering will retain office space in the front of the building but the majority of the building will be for storage. Also, the rear parking lot east of the building will be converted into a secured 11,000 sq. ft. outdoor storage area. Construction is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2008. H:IDevelopment Status Reports12008-3rd quarter.doc Page 1 of 5 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES: 5. Thora Thorson Addition. The EDA purchased the former Thora Thorson Elementary School (7323 58th Ave N) from Robbinsdale Area Schools in October 2005, cleared the site in spring 2006, replatted the property into 17 lots and installed new infrastructure (street, water, sewer, etc.) in summer 2006. In fall 2006, the EDA sold the 17 lots to three different builders for new house construction. The status of the 17 lots is as follows: • Lot 1 (5752 Oregon Ct): The house (including landscaping) has been completed and sold. ■ Lot 2 (5746 Oregon Ct): The house is complete and is listed for sale by the builder. ■ Lot 3 (5740 Oregon Ct): The house (including landscaping) has been completed and sold. ■ Lot 4 (5734 Oregon Ct): The house (including landscaping) has been completed and sold. • Lot 5 (5728 Oregon Ct): A foundation for the new house was installed in 2007 but work has not progressed beyond that point and the builder is unresponsive. The city's Building Official has started code enforcement action. • Lot 6 (5722 Oregon Ct): The lot is vacant and is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. • Lot 7 (5716 Oregon Ct): The house is 50% complete and the property is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. ■ Lot 8 (5708 Oregon Ct): The lot is vacant and is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. ■ Lot 9 (5701 Oregon Ct): The house is 75% complete and the property is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. • Lot 10 (5709 Oregon Ct): The house is complete and is listed for sale by the builder's foreclosing lender. • Lot 11 (5717 Oregon Ct): The house is 50% complete and the property is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. • Lot 12 (5723 Oregon Ct): The lot is vacant and is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. ■ Lot 13 (5729 Oregon Ct): The house is 75% complete and the property is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. ■ Lot 14 (5735 Oregon Ct): The house (including landscaping) has been completed and sold. ■ Lot 15 (5741 Oregon Ct): The lot is vacant and is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. ■ Lot 16 (5747 Oregon Ct): The lot is vacant and is being foreclosed by the builder's lender. ■ Lot 17 (5753 Oregon Ct): The house (including landscaping) has been completed and sold. H:IDevelopment Status Reports 12008 -3rd quarter.doc Page 2 of 5 6. 5710 and 5720 32nd. The EDA purchased this property for $135,000 in June 2006, plus an adjacent tax forfeit lot in July 2006 for $6,000. The EDA demolished the existing house and replatted the property into two lots. City crews completed the grading work in June 2007. The EDA sold each lot to Covenant Builders for $85,500 per lot in August 2007. The house at 5710 32nd was completed and sold in November 2007. The house at 5720 32nd is nearly complete. It has been foreclosed by the builder's lender, who has a purchase agreement with a buyer who would complete the house then homestead it. 7. 6325 41St. The EDA purchased this tax forfeit property for $80,000 in January 2007 then demolished the existing house in summer 2007. The EDA sold this lot to Clark Kent Homes for $90,000 in October 2007. The new house is nearly complete. It has been foreclosed by the builder's lender and is currently on the market. 8. 3541 Hampshire. The EDA purchased this fire -damaged property for $80,000 in January 2007 then demolished the existing house in summer 2007. In June 2008 the EDA accepted a proposal from Taylor Made Homes to purchase this lot for $75,000 and build a new house. The lot sale closed in September 2008. Construction is expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2008. The builder has a buyer for the house. 9. 5527 Xenia. The EDA purchased this property for $101,500 in March 2007 then demolished the existing house in summer 2007. The EDA is currently seeking new house proposals with a lot price of $65,000. 10. 4330 & 4326 Zane. The EDA had been holding these lots for undetermined future redevelopment due to the adjacent unpaved alley. In 2007 the city reconstructed the alley with concrete, and the EDA decided to move ahead with selling these lots for new single family houses. The EDA is currently seeking new house proposals with a lot price of $60,000 per lot (both lots must be purchased by the same builder). 11. 4310 & 4306 Zane. The EDA had been holding these lots for undetermined future redevelopment due to the adjacent unpaved alley. In 2007 the city reconstructed the alley with concrete, and the EDA decided to move ahead with selling these lots for new single family houses. The EDA is currently seeking new house proposals with a lot price of $60,000 per lot (both lots must be purchased by the same builder). 12. 5918 Idaho. The EDA purchased this property for $95,000 in July 2007. Demolition was completed in the fourth quarter of 2007. The EDA is currently seeking new house proposals with a lot price of $60,000. 13. 5626 Vera Cruz. The EDA purchased this property for $75,000 in September 2007. Demolition was completed in the first quarter of 2008. The EDA is currently seeking new house proposals with a lot price of $65,000. 14. 4604 & 4612 Hampshire (formerly 6622 46th). The EDA purchased this property for $150,000 in November 2007. Demolition was completed in the first quarter of 2008 except for foundation removal and miscellaneous work which occurred in the second quarter. The EDA is currently seeking new house proposals with a lot price of $70,000 per lot (both lots must be purchased by the same builder). HADevelopment Status Reports12008-3rd quarter.doc Page 3 of 5 15. 5401 35th. The EDA purchased this foreclosed property for $75,000 in November 2007. Demolition was completed in the first quarter of 2008 except for foundation removal and miscellaneous work which occurred in the second quarter. The EDA is currently seeking new house proposals with a lot price of $40,000; this lower -than -normal lot price is intended to account for the cost of soil correction to a depth of approximately 12 feet. 16. 5657 Adair. The EDA purchased this foreclosed property for $75,000 in December 2007. Demolition was completed in the first quarter of 2008 except for foundation removal and miscellaneous work which occurred in the second quarter of 2008. The EDA is currently seeking new house proposals with a lot price of $65,000. 17. 522535 Ih . The EDA purchased this foreclosed property for $78,000 in April 2008. Demolition will occur during the fourth quarter of 2008. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. 18. 3533 Lee. The EDA purchased this property for $80,000 in April 2008. Demolition will occur during the fourth quarter of 2008. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. 19. 4331 Vera Cruz. The EDA purchased this foreclosed property for $70,000 in May 2008. Demolition will occur during the fourth quarter of 2008. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. 20. 3457 Regent. The EDA purchased this property for $68,700 in June 2008. Demolition will occur during the fourth quarter of 2008. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. 21. 513234 th PI. The EDA purchased this foreclosed property for $84,900 in September 2008. Demolition is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2008 or first quarter of 2009. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. 22. 5824 Regent. The EDA purchased this property for $75,000 in September 2008. Demolition is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2008 or first quarter of 2009. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. 23, 4343 Xenia. The EDA is purchasing this foreclosed property for $62,400. Closing is scheduled for October 2008. Demolition is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2008 or first quarter of 2009. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. 24. 530934 th PI. The EDA is purchasing this foreclosed property for $77,900. Closing is anticipated in October 2008. Demolition is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2008 or first quarter of 2009. The EDA would likely set a price and start marketing this lot in 2009. H:IDevelopment Status Reports12008-3rd quarter.doc Page 4 of 5 25. Highway 100 - Excess Right -of -Way. In January 2005, the EDA made a formal request to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to survey and appraise potential parcels. MnDOT is currently in the process of getting all of the appraisals completed, and due to market conditions neither party has made these property transfers a high priority. If the EDA proceeds with the acquisitions, re -sale of the property for development would probably occur within two years of the acquisitions, depending on market conditions. 26. 5111, 5121, 5201 and 5211 56th (Four 4-plexes on Bass Lake Road). ® In October 2006, the EDA acquired 5201 and 5211 for $370,000 each. It then relocated the tenants, abated the asbestos and demolished the buildings. Grading, seeding and other final site work was completed during summer 2007. ■ In January 2007, the EDA acquired 5111 for $370,000. It then relocated the tenants, abated the asbestos and demolished the building. Grading, seeding and other final site work was completed during summer 2007. ■ In June 2007, the EDA acquired a Sheriff's Certificate at the foreclosure sale for $330,000 and the building became vacant shortly thereafter. The foreclosure redemption period expired at the end of 2007 so the EDA did not take possession of the property until January 2008. The EDA demolished the building during the second quarter of 2008. Grading, seeding and other final site work there was completed in September 2008. ■ The EDA has not yet formally determined what to do with these four properties. However, the City Council has discussed incorporating the site into Twin Oak Park and building a stormwater treatment pond there. 27. 5901 56th (4-plex on Bass Lake Road). In September 2008 the EDA acquired this vacant, foreclosed property for $238,000. Asbestos and household hazardous waste abatement will occur in early November and demolition is expected by the end of November. Grading, seeding and other site work would occur in spring 2009. The EDA has not yet had any discussions regarding what to do with this property. H:IDevelopment Status Reports W08 -3rd quarter.doc Page 5 of 5 ° 6 NEW HOPEL ti N i H. 9 ''g s e'-' t•4„ w 39TH avE. 39TH p O 2 x DI W THri R a 0 x 3 w z C7 v ROBBINSDALE 01 LAKELAND AVE. N. ni nnr � ext 14737 PL. N. IrY U 91 $T AV N. _ ' W al AYE Q Ittl p � 8880 � � fO/1 2 Q to WI` G a0 TN AVE H. • m a d: o o z W X 4,. T `fin P JE x D ik . 3 AVE TN AVE. N 2i f�—•�y 3° 7N b VE. tlJM N TIM' Ra1Y R, CRYSTAL + rata RLx {y RSEY7TH $ vl I �T [•,,^y. WCLE �I Npft -_ Lj V• w IfNt1�t fly I, Ia 100 ✓✓✓ T/ 6TH —AVEC' i6'tl AVE N .:i -71 Ioe- I a ! S H I Zt IL�..J� Z e f [;;J ! HIL w '-.,:...'n�� .aro AVE. H I N z.. a n ei7N �� z w [AVE.$��N 1'I X k VALLEY PLACE _ i �I® r .� �J� �vr 33RD WE i I-� r 33RD � AVE. N. - 1 D � �nnn ! M4 .: ....,..I.. Fr--'-^� tl ,. GO ��LLEY I ...at I^alt t•a < � � AV NV > �• a bE I 32N pVE. N •� :. NORTHERN ORI 2� 5 W �n�l�E. � 3 = N. W � 7 tt 31 Sr � t � N. � w > TM ,ry .. °i " I' 29�1 � �1 28tH E N. NEW HOPE �G x `i .xPQ Ow T. <a>:.�.::.I , TN?— ,n a -1k. m .17 OOCDEH VACCEY �+ CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS ON PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS The Council considered the Second Reading of an ordinance map rezoning 5430 Douglas Drive North from Commercial Planned Unit Development to 1-1 Light Industrial. Motion carried to approve. 2. The Council considered the First Reading of an ordinance amending City Code Section 515.21 and Sections 515.33 through 515.53 to allow certain types of telecommunications towers as a conditional use in all zoning districts subject to limitations on height, location, adjacent uses and other factors. Motion carried to approve the First Reading. OCT -13-2003 17 30 CITY*LAUDERDALE Jim & Staci Bownik 4623 Brunswick Avenue North Crystal, MN 55422 October 13, 2008 Community Development Department City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, lv1N 55422 Re: Special Land Use Application 2008 - Dear Planning Commission: We have several concerns regarding the vehicular traffic at the intersection due t character of the neighborhood, and the 1 approved. While requiring a 55 -foot set be overly strict, we feel a 20 -foot minirr. Sincerely, Jim & Staci Bownik 6516312066 P.01i01 Attin ; ir 4552 Brunswick Avenue North )sed variance request including safety of ceased site lines, consistency with the lent the city would set if the variance were from the side street lot line in this case may rtback would be more appropriate. TOTAL P.01 TABLE F -I FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES AND ACREAGES - BASED ON THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP LAND USE CATEGORY ACRES PERCENT Low Density Residential (LDR) 1,868.0 49.8% Medium Density Residential (MDR) 43.6 1.2% High Density Residential (HDR) 69.9 1.9% Commercial (NC) 14.0 0.4% -Neighborhood General Commercial (GC) 103.6 2.8% Industrial (IND) 36.9 1.0% Undeveloped LDR (this is cemetery land) 77.9 2.1% Airport 334.5 8.9% Parks (includes open water on Twin Lake) 261.4 7.0% Public Institutional 34.0 0.9% Street, Alley or Highway Right -of Way 738.0 19.7% Railroad Rights of Way 48.0 1.3% MU -Town Center 11.2 0.3% MU-WB/81 104.2 2.8% Other LDR 4.5 0.1% TOTAL: 3,749.7 100.0% 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -PLAN COMM DRAFT 1011312008- PAGE 20 OF 118 TABLE F-2 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES AND ACREAGES - BASED ON THE PROPOSED NEW VERSION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP LAND USE CATEGORY ACRES PERCENT Low Density Residential (LDR) 1,777.5 47.4% Medium Density Residential (MDR) 43.3 1.2% High Density Residential (HDR) 91.0 2.4% Neighborhood Commercial (NC) 13.2 0.4% General Commercial (GC) 129.5 3.5% Industrial (IND) 109.5 2.9% Airport 334.5 8.9% Parks (includes open water on Twin Lake) 247.9 6.6% Railroad Rights of Way 46.4 1.2% Undevelo ed 1 3.0 0.1% Undeveloped LDR 93.1 2.5% Public Institutional GC 1.0 0.0% Public Institutional HDR 2.7 0.1% Public Institutional LDR 108.6 2.9% Public Institutional Park 10.5 0.3% Street, Alley or Highway Right -of Way 738.0 19.7% TOTAL: 3,749.7 100.0% 2008 CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PLAN COMM DRAFT 10/13/2008 - PAGE 21 OF 118 ISSUE TO DISCUSS IS Lb Cry I DATE NAMES Please Print } ADDRESS " t/ TELEPHONE NO. (Optional) --) 6v PLEASE PRESENT TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY PRIOR TO MEETING ISSUE TO DISCUSS IS DATE I O NAME - _ �/� 1�-- Please Print ADDRES TELEPHONE NO. (Optional) PLEASE PRESENT TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY PRIOR TO MEETING ISSUE TO DISCUSS IS —A6-� DATE-Lo— Please ATE l0 Please Print ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. (Optional) PLEASE PRESENT TO THE REE ORDING SECRETARY PRIOR