Loading...
2019.05.13 - Packet 4141 Douglas Drive North • Crystal, Minnesota 55422-1696 Tel: (763) 531-1000 • Fax: (763) 531-1188 • www.crystalmn.gov Crystal Planning Commission Agenda Summary Monday, May 13, 2019 7 p.m. Crystal City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes* a. Monday, April 8, 2019 meeting minutes 3. Public Hearings* a. Conditional use permit application from A Better Childcare for a child day care facility at 7200 – 56th Avenue North (Application Number 2019-05) b. Preliminary plat application for Iron Horse Addition at Ironhorse Park at 5155 Kentucky Avenue North (Application Number 2019-06) 4. Old Business* a. Consider recommendation for a proposed specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Drive North (Application Number 2019-04) 5. New Business* a. Conformance to Comprehensive Plan - Sale of three parcels at 5155 Kentucky Avenue North b. Discuss proposed Town Center district regulations 6. General Information a. City Council actions on previous Planning Commission items: None b. Update from Council liaison c. Staff preview of likely agenda items for Monday, June 10, 2019 meeting 7. Open Forum 8. Adjournment * Items for which supporting materials are included in the meeting packet Page 1 of 3 CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION DETAILED AGENDA Monday, May 13, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Crystal City Hall Commissioners, please call 763.531.1142 or email dan.olson@crystalmn.gov if unable to attend * Items for which supporting materials are included in the meeting packet 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at ______ p.m. with the following members present:  Commissioner (Ward 1) Sears  Commissioner (Ward 2) Selton [Chair]  Commissioner (Ward 4) Einfeldt-Brown [Vice Chair]  Commissioner (Ward 1) Heigel  Commissioner (Ward 3) Maristany [Sec. Vice Chair]  Commissioner (Ward 4) Johnson  Commissioner (Ward 2) Strand  Commissioner (Ward 3) Buck  Commissioner (At- Large) Seffren 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES * Moved by _______________ and seconded by _______________ to approve the minutes of the April 8, 2019 regular meeting with the following exceptions: Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS* a. Conditional use permit from A Better Childcare for a child day care facility at 7200 – 56th Avenue North (Application Number 2019-05): Staff presented the following: Page 2 of 3 The following were heard: Planning Commission discussion: Moved by _______________ and seconded by _______________ to recommend ______ to the City Council of the conditional use permit for a proposed child day care facility at 7200 – 56th Avenue North with the conditions in the staff report. b. Preliminary plat application for Iron Horse Addition at Iron Horse Park at 5155 Kentucky Avenue North (Application Number 2019-06): Staff presented the following: The following were heard: Planning Commission discussion: Page 3 of 3 Moved by _______________ and seconded by _______________ to recommend ______ to the City Council of the preliminary plat at 5155 Kentucky Avenue North with the conditions in the staff report. 4. OLD BUSINESS a. Consider recommendation for a proposed specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Drive North (Application Number 2019-04) Moved by _______________ and seconded by _______________ to recommend ______ to the City Council of the rezoning to Planned Development at 3501 Douglas Drive North. 5. NEW BUSINESS a. Conformance to Comprehensive Plan - Sale of three parcels at 5155 Kentucky Avenue North b. Discuss proposed Town Center district regulations 6. GENERAL INFORMATION a. City Council actions on previous Planning Commission items: None b. Update from Council Liaison c. Staff preview of likely agenda items for Monday, June 10, 2019 meeting 7. OPEN FORUM 8. ADJOURNMENT Moved by _____ and seconded by ______ to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at ______ p.m. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – April 8, 2019 CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, April 8, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Crystal City Hall 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:03 p.m. with the following members present:  Commissioner (Ward 1) Sears X Commissioner (Ward 2) Selton [Chair] X Commissioner (Ward 4) Einfeldt-Brown [Vice Chair] X Commissioner (Ward 1) Heigel X Commissioner (Ward 3) Maristany [Sec. Vice Chair] X Commissioner (Ward 4) Johnson X Commissioner (Ward 2) Strand X Commissioner (Ward 3) Buck  Commissioner (At-Large) Seffren Other attendees: City Planner Dan Olson; City Council Liaison John Budziszewski; City Council members Nancy LaRoche and Therese Kiser; representatives from A-1 Reliable Home Care, including Tom Wasmoen, Deborah Ojogwu, Benjamin Ojogwu, and John DeFreitas; and other interested persons 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Maristany and seconded by Strand to approve the minutes of the March 11, 2019 regular meeting. Ayes all. Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARING a. Rezoning to Planned Development for a proposed specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Drive North (Application Number 2019-04): Planner Olson presented a summary of the staff report and stated he is recommending approval of the rezoning application with the conditions in the staff report. Commission member Strand said she attended the neighborhood meeting and said there was a lot of interested persons in attendance. She felt the applicant did not adequately answer many of the attendees’ questions. Strand asked if there would be subsequent phases of this development. Planner Olson said that the applicant is asking for a 30-bed facility and if they wanted to have more beds, they would have to go through a public process to amend the Planned Development. The City Council would review any amendment on its own merits. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – April 8, 2019 Commission member Heigel had several operational questions, which were answered by the applicant’s team:  Can the windows be opened? Answer: In this facility, they will only be opened to allow for a 4” gap  Is each floor designated for residents with certain medical issues? Answer: No  How many residents are allowed in the outdoor recreational area at one time and how are they staffed? Answer: There is room for approximately 8 residents and staff  What times will this recreational be used: Answer: It varies based on the desire of the residents, but a staff member is present  How are doors accessed (card or something else)? Answer: Probably either by fob or punch pad. A hardware consultant will provide details during creation of the building plans.  Is one security person on staff enough for all their responsibilities? Answer: The security personnel will be able to monitor the entire building on camera. Other staff will also be overseeing the residents.  Who will be watching out for the welfare of the residents since the State won’t be doing that? Answer: The MN Department of Health (MDH) has requirements for how to handle complaints from family members for vulnerable adults. A-1 has a care plan for each resident, and works with the family to resolve conflicts. If A-1 needs further guidance on MDH rules, they will contact them.  What do the residents do during the day? Answer: Each resident has programs they attend and A-1 provides transportation to those programs. The residents are very busy.  Is the RN only in the building during the day? Answer: Yes, but the RN is on- call after those hours and there are other medical staff on duty at all times. Pre- packaged medication can be provided by on-duty staff at those times when the RN is not present.  Are the five examples submitted in the narrative confirmed as “housing with services”? Answer: Planner Olson said he has confirmed some are not regulated by the state in the same manner. Commission member Maristany asked several operational questions that were answered by the applicant:  Are out-patient services provided: Answer: No  What is the age range of residents living at the facility? Answer: All are adults  Will the residents have a range of cognitive abilities? Answer: Yes, but they are all self-preserving and are able to walk  Will residents have a history of destructive or criminal behavior: No  Staff will stay at the home on the property? Answer: Some staff will live at the home, much like an apartment.  Will light pollution be an issue? Answer: A lighting plan meets the city’s requirements and lighting will not spill over the property lines.  What about this location makes the site a good fit for A-1? Answer: The site provides a sense of community for the residents. A-1 already has a facility in nearby Robbinsdale. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – April 8, 2019 Commission member Strand said that the building will tower over nearby residential uses and is much taller than other buildings in the area. She believes that the EDA-owned lot south of A-1’s site will be unbuildable and should be included with any redevelopment project at 3501 Douglas. She believes that A-1 has a nice facility, but it does not fit in with the adjacent land uses. Mr. Wasmoen said that the proposed building will be nestled into the hill so it will have the appearance of a 2-story building. Strand asked where snow storage be. Planner Olson stated there is a snow storage area adjacent to the stormwater infiltration basin. Strand asked how many office units will be in the existing building. Mr. Wasmoen said A-1 will have the top floor and the lower units will be remodeled and rented out. Chair Selton opened the public hearing. Selton read into the record a comment letter from the property owner at 3329 Florida Avenue dated April 8, 2019. The letter was received by city staff after the Planning Commission agenda packets were sent out. Selton invited those audience members who filled out a green card to make comments or ask questions. Each person spoke once. A Crystal resident said he does not support the rezoning because the high density facility is not compatible with the lower density neighborhood. There would also be a lot of traffic conflicts, making the currently quiet neighborhood a noisy place to live. There will be more emergency vehicles and delivery vehicles as a result of this development. A Crystal resident said she does not support the rezoning. This property should be developed for new homes which are badly needed in Crystal. The A-1 facility would cause a lot of traffic which would be dangerous to pedestrians and create more congestion. A Crystal resident said he does not support the rezoning because a mental health facility is not appropriate for this neighborhood. The facility would not be regulated by the State and should not even be allowed in Crystal. A Crystal resident said he does not support the rezoning. The Commission should do the right thing and vote against the proposal. A Crystal resident said she does not support the rezoning. She’s concerned that a tall retaining wall is needed to protect the neighbors from the residents. A health clinic like this is not appropriate for this area. Mr. Wasmoen said that the retaining wall is needed so that that the building can be set into the hill, lessening the impact of the height of the building. A Crystal resident said he supports the rezoning. This facility will be run according to state regulations and many of the concerns of tonight’s attendees are not related to zoning. The facility will meet the requirements of the city’s zoning code. A Crystal resident said he does not support the rezoning. There should be houses on this site, not a commercial facility. The area is not a commercial area. A Crystal resident said he does not support the rezoning. He said A-1 has not made it clear whether the residents would be here by court order. He believes the height of the building will be too tall for the neighborhood. There will need to be an inspection of the Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – April 8, 2019 commercial kitchen of the A-1 facility. He believes the rental house will become a “flop- house” for A-1 employees. He said that the EDA lot south of A-1’s site will not be developable if this rezoning is approved. He questioned how evacuations of residents will take place if there is a fire. Will a small staff be able to evacuate 30 vulnerable adults? He believes that the facility should comply with the density requirements of the Comprehensive Plan just like an apartment building. He does not think this neighborhood should be a redevelopment area. Mr. Wasmoen said the residents would not be placed here by court order. The commercial kitchen will be inspected by a health department. Ms. Ojogwu said the residents would come from hospitals and stay here until they get well. A Crystal resident said he does not support the rezoning. He wants to do a significant remodeling of his home and if this is approved, he may leave Crystal. He felt mislead by A-1 at the neighborhood meeting, where A-1 said the residents were here by court order but now they are saying something different. He said that A-1 did not previously describe the residents going to and from the facility, but at tonight’s meeting they are saying that residents will frequently leave the facility. He said that A-1 has several complaints online from a state agency. The complaints relate to the inability of A-1 personnel to do their jobs. Ms. Ojogwu said every state-regulated facility receives citations. If the state believes they are not capable of operating a facility, they will be shut down. Mr. Ojogwu said that they are invested in the care of the residents and this facility will create employment for many people. A Crystal resident said she does not support the rezoning. She is concerned that the site will only have a property maintenance inspection by the city. She will be impacted by police calls and traffic of this facility. Ms. Ojogwu said that any police calls would most likely be because of the refusal of residents to attend their medical appointments, not because of the misbehavior of residents. Ms. Ojogwu said that the opposition to A-1’s facility feels like racial prejudice (Ms. Ojogwu is black). Chair Selton said he has seen the citations referenced by the previous resident and they are not about the abuse of A-1’s residents. It appears that the State’s citations refer to employees not being properly oriented on A-1’s policies. A Crystal resident asked how residents are transported. If staff are transporting residents, then they are not in the facility taking care of the residents. Mr. Ojogwu said they have contracted out for transporting of residents, and staff help out as needed. The resident said she would rather see a one-story senior living building here than A-1’s facility. A Crystal resident said he wanted to know if a study had been done in other cities to show how many police calls a facility like A-1’s would generate. Planner Olson said he’s not aware of such a study. The resident is also concerned that criminals will be placed in A- 1’s facility. Mr. Ojogwu said that A-1 has the ability to determine which residents they accept. A Crystal resident said he does not support the rezoning. The request is not compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. This commercial use would encroach farther into the neighborhood than envisioned by the plan. This use should be subject to density requirements. He believes A’-1’s large facility would make the development of vacant parcels in the area less desirable. A-1’s facility would be open 24 hours per day, which is very different from the surrounding neighborhood. This facility should be in a commercial area. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – April 8, 2019 A Crystal resident said she does not support the rezoning. She said A-1’s facility would be understaffed when staff are home ill. A Crystal resident said she does not support the rezoning. She said the facility should be subject to density requirements and the density would be too high with residents and visitors coming to the property. This rezoning would also lead to other rezoning requests in the area. The facility would have negative environmental impacts. Commission member Heigel asked how residents would be referred to this facility. Ms. Ojogwu said they are referred to them by the state. Each resident has a case manager who refers them to A-1. Complaints can be made to the case manager. Commission member Maristany asked if A-1 has the ability to not accept a resident. Ms. Ojogwu said yes. Chair Selton closed the public hearing. Moved by Strand and seconded by Heigel to recommend denial of the rezoning to Planned Development and continue this agenda item until May 13, 2019 so that city staff and the city attorney may prepare findings for denial for review by the Commission. Ayes: Strand, Heigel, Einfeldt-Brown, Johnson, Maristany. Nays: Selton, Buck Motion carried. 4. OLD BUSINESS – None 5. NEW BUSINESS - None 6. GENERAL INFORMATION a. City Council actions on previous Planning Commission items: Planner Olson stated that the City Council approved the rezoning to Planned Development for the Rivertree School expansion project. b. Update from Council Liaison: Mr. Budziszewski provided an update on the Becker Park groundbreaking event. The Economic Development Authority (EDA) has looked at potential property they could sell for new homes. The Council is working on their 2019-20 goals. c. Staff preview of likely agenda items for Monday, May 13, 2019 meeting. Mr. Olson indicated that the application deadline is not until next week. The Commission is expected to review a 3-lot subdivision request for the western portion of Ironhorse Park as well as review a draft of the proposed Town Center zoning regulations. 7. OPEN FORUM Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes – April 8, 2019 Commission member Strand said the brew-fest fundraiser held on March 15 for Becker Park was pretty successful and plans are to hold another such event next year. The next park fundraiser is a plant sale on May 19. Commission member Einfelt-Brown asked when Taco Bell would open and what was happening at the old Wendy’s restaurant. Planner Olson said he believes the building permit has been issued for the Taco Bell, but he’s not sure when the restaurant will open. A sit-down restaurant is going into the old Wendy’s building. 8. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Buck and seconded by Heigel to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:41 p.m. 7200 – 56TH AVENUE NORTH – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PAGE 1 OF 4 _______________________________________________________________ FROM: Dan Olson, City Planner ____________________________________________________________________ TO: Planning Commission (for May 13 Meeting) DATE: May 7, 2019 RE: PUBLIC HEARING – Conditional Use Permit request from A Better Childcare for a child day care facility at 7200 – 56th Avenue North (Application Number 2019-05) A. BACKGROUND A Better Childcare is proposing a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow a child day care facility at 7200 – 56th Avenue North. The applicant will either lease or buy the property for the day care. The property is zoned Commercial (C) and a child day care facility is a conditional use within that district. Notice of the May 13 public hearing was published in the Sun Post on May 2 and mailed to owners within 500 feet (see attachment A). A hearing notice was also sent to the City of New Hope since the property is adjacent to the New Hope/Crystal boundary line. Attachments: A. Site location and public hearing mailing notice map B. Zoning map C. 2030 Planned Land Use Map D. Photos of existing property E. Project narrative F. Public comment G. Site and floor plan (2 sheets) B. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE Property history The existing 3,444 square foot building was constructed in 1966 as a “food and dairy store” (similar to today’s convenience stores). The property was most recently used as a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit for 7200 – 56th Avenue North 7200 – 56TH AVENUE NORTH – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PAGE 2 OF 4 liquor store. In 2013 the City Council approved a CUP to allow an eight foot tall screening fence that was two feet over the maximum height of six feet. Surrounding uses The following are the existing land uses and zoning districts surrounding this property:  North: Single family homes zoned Low Density Residential (R-1)  East – Restaurant in New Hope zoned Community Business (CB)  West – Single family homes zoned R-1  South – Across 56th Avenue, commercial businesses in New Hope zoned CB Proposed conditional use The existing building will be used for a child day care facility. The applicant is not proposing to enlarge the building or increase the size of the parking lot pavement. The floor plan (attachment G) shows four classrooms, an office and a kitchen. The day care will have a maximum of 50 children under the age of 12, with six full-time and one part- time staff members. The day care will be open from 6:30 AM to 6 PM, Monday through Friday. Conditional Use permit criteria The following are the relevant criteria for approval of conditional use permits in city code section 510.19: (a) The proposed use has been approved as a conditional use in the zoning district for which it is proposed. Findings: Child day care facilities are a conditional use in the Commercial zoning district. (b) The conditional use will be in accordance with the general objectives, or with any specific objective, of the city’s comprehensive plan and the unified development code (UDC). Findings: On the 2030 Planned Land Use map, the properties are guided as Neighborhood Commercial, which is described as “small-scale commercial uses embedded within or adjacent to residential areas”. The proposed day care facility is in conformance with this land use designation. Prior to the 2018 zoning code update, this property was zoned as Neighborhood Commercial, but it was rezoned to Commercial with that update. (c) The conditional use will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. Findings: The property is located on the edge of a commercial area that transitions into a residential area. Since 1966 the commercial building has 7200 – 56TH AVENUE NORTH – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PAGE 3 OF 4 existed at this location and since the building and parking lot will not be enlarged with the proposed day care use, the character of the vicinity will not change. (d) Impacts such as noise, hours of activity, and exterior lighting have been sufficiently addressed to mitigate negative impacts on nearby uses. Findings: The proposed use is not expected to generate unusual noise impacts, but the existing eight foot tall wooden fence will serve to screen outdoor use of the day care facility. Hours of operation will be similar to other commercial uses in the area. No new exterior lighting is proposed for the property. (e) Parking is adequately provided for the proposed conditional use. Findings: According to UDC requirements 15 parking spaces are required for this use. The site plan provides 25 spaces. (f) In the approval of a conditional use permit, the City Council may impose such conditions as it determines is necessary to make the use compatible with other uses allowed in the same district zone or vicinity. Findings: The proposed conditions of approval for the CUP are found in section C of this staff report. Use specific standards The following is the relevant use specific standard in city code section 515.19, Subd. 7 for approval of child day care facilities, followed by staff’s findings of the standard. 1) The facility is served by arterial, collector, or municipal state aid streets and such pedestrian facilities as are necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the facility. Findings: In the 2030 Comprehensive Plan 56th Avenue is identified as a minor arterial street. There is an existing sidewalk along 56th Avenue. Notable Site Plan Elements The following is a description of notable site plan elements: 1) Parking. According to UDC requirements 15 parking spaces are required for this use. The site currently contains 19 parking spaces. The applicant will have the existing pavement behind the building striped for six employee parking spaces, bringing the number of spaces on the property to 25. 2) Child pick up and drop off. The applicant is proposing to have children picked up and dropped off directly in front of the building entrance facing 56th Avenue North. Child drop off will occur between 6:30 and 8:30 AM and pick up will occur between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. The city’s public works director, the 7200 – 56TH AVENUE NORTH – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PAGE 4 OF 4 police department, and West Metro Fire Rescue District have reviewed this child pick up and drop off plan and found it adequate to meet vehicle movement within the site, including fire trucks. With the low number of children attending this day care, traffic impacts to the area are not expected to be noticeable. 3) Pedestrian connections – There is an existing public sidewalk along 56th Avenue North. 4) Screening. There is an existing wooden fence along the property lines adjacent to the residential homes. There will be no rooftop mechanical to screen. Refuse containers will be stored in a shed in the back of the property. 5) Exterior lighting. The applicant is not proposing to add exterior lighting to the property. C. REQUESTED ACTION The Planning Commission is being asked to make a recommendation to the City Council to either deny or approve the CUP to allow A Better Childcare to operate a child day care facility at 7200 – 56th Avenue North. The Commission may reference the findings in Section B, above. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Compliance. This conditional use permit is subject to the applicable requirements of the city code, and the applicant is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances, and is required to obtain such other permits and permissions as may be required. 2. No Waiver. Failure by the City to take action with respect to any violation of any condition, covenant or term of this conditional use permit shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such condition, covenant, or term or any subsequent violation of the same or any other condition, covenant, or term. 3. Revocation. The violation of any terms or conditions of this conditional use permit including, but not limited to, any applicable federal, state, or local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances, may result in revocation of the conditional use permit. The applicant shall be given written notice of any violation and reasonable time, as determined by the City, to cure the violation before a revocation of the permit will occur. 4. Binding Effect. This conditional use permit, and the conditions placed on it, are binding on the applicant, their successors and assigns, shall run with the property, and shall not in any way be affected by the subsequent sale, lease, or other change from current ownership, until the conditional use permit is terminated or revoked as provided herein. The obligations of the applicant under this conditional use permit shall also be the obligations of the current and any subsequent owners of the property. 5. Acceptance of Conditions. Utilization of the property for any of the uses allowed by this conditional use permit shall automatically be deemed acceptance of, and agreement to, the terms and conditions of this conditional use permit without qualification, reservation, or exception. City Council action is anticipated on May 21, 2019. Site Location and Public Hearing Notice Mailing Map 7200 – 56th Ave. N 4141 Douglas Dr. N. Crystal MN 55422 Attachment A Zoning Map 7200 – 56th Ave. N 4141 Douglas Dr. N. Crystal MN 55422 Attachment B 2030 Planned Land Use Map 7200 – 56th Ave. N 4141 Douglas Dr. N. Crystal MN 55422 Attachment C Attachment D Conditional Use Permit Application Checklist Below please find the correspondences for question one on the conditional use permit project narrative. a)7200 Bass Lake Rd is part of the C zoning district. b)7200 Bass Lake Rd is currently vacant but was previously used as a liquor store. c)We propose the property be used as a childcare center. We will operate Monday through Friday between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 6 p.m. We hope to have 8 infants between the ages of 6 weeks and 16 months, 12 toddlers between the ages of 16 months and 32 months, 18 preschoolers between the ages of 32 months and Kindergarten, 12 school-age children. The exact child count will be determined by licensing. Our plan has present occupancy based on the room dimensions. d)Our proposed use of a childcare center is allowed in the C zoning district. e)The city’s comprehensive planned land use map shows 7200 Bass Lake Rd as general commercial. We would meet this accordance because we are a business. We will be reusing the building for a new purpose. Our childcare center will not negatively impact the neighboring community or businesses. 7200 is a free-standing building located on a corner. The neighboring area is protected in a variety of ways which include an 8-foot wood fence, we feature our own parking lot with ample parking. Our parking lot is not shared with any other business. Parent drop off and pick up will be located in the front parking lot where parents will enter the main entrance to drop off and pick up which prevents any congestion or traffic which could impact neighboring businesses. We will post signage and inform parents that pick up and drop off parking is located in the front of the building. f)We will operate as an affordable childcare center. The existing building will be built out to include four classrooms. We plan to add a fenced in playground area in the rear of the building. The exterior of the building structure will not change and will remain harmonious. The only change to the outside will be the play area which will be added in the rear. g)Our hours of operation will be Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6 p.m... Children will be allowed to play outside between the hours of 9-9:30 which allows for 15 minutes for each group of children. Children will then be given 30 minutes of recess for each room between the hours or 11:30 and 12:30. Finally, children will have the opportunity to play between the hours of 4:30 to 5. The space currently has an 8-foot fence that separates 7200 from the business next to it as well as the residence located behind it. This fence along with the trees and hedges will help to lower the noise of the children at play. One classroom of children will be allowed on the playground at a time for a designated amount of time listed between the times above. h)There are 15 parking spaces located in the front of the building which will be used for parent drop off and pick up. The city requires 10 spaces for a childcare center. There are also 6 additional spaces located in the rear which will be used for staff parking. i)There are two specific standards in the city code section 515. One is side set back which is met in the commercial district. The other is 56th Ave is a minor arterial. Attachment E Response to CUP changes/additional information needed 1. The shed located on the side of the building will be 7 feet or less, feature a fence behind it and will be 3 feet from the property line fence. 2. The property owner will be striping the six parking stalls located in the rear for staff parking. 3. There will be no additional exterior lights added. We are more than adequately lite with the existing LED lights. 4. As for trash purposes we will have 3 95-gallon trash containers and one recycling container which will be stored in a small pre-fabricated garden shed. Trash and Recycling will be picked up once a week. 5. It is yet to be determined if a new rooftop unit will be needed. We currently have two units that are centrally located on the roof. The need for a third unit will be decided by the design mechanics and we will investigate screening for any new unit we provide at that time. 6. No new trees will be added and the only landscaping that will be done is for the safety base and playground area to make the ground safe for children. 1 Dan Olson From:MELODIE HANSON <mhanson504@comcast.net> Sent:Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:10 AM To:Dan Olson Subject:RE: Land Use Application 2019 - 05 Thank you, Dan. As a neighboring resident, I do not have any objections to this land use application permit. Thank you for sharing with neighboring residents. Melodie On April 30, 2019 at 8:16 AM Dan Olson <Dan.Olson@crystalmn.gov> wrote: Hi Melodie – Thanks for your questions.   The answers are in red, below.  If you have any other  questions, let me know.   Dan Olson City Planner, City of Crystal 763-531-1142 | Main: 763-531-1000 | www.crystalmn.gov 4141 Douglas Dr. N. | Crystal, MN 55422-1696  From: MELODIE HANSON [mailto:mhanson504@comcast.net]   Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 3:51 AM  To: Dan Olson <Dan.Olson@crystalmn.gov>  Subject: Land Use Application 2019 ‐ 05  Dear Dan: Attachment F 2 I received the Public Hearing Notice for Land Use Application 2019-05, A Better Childcare. Could you advise the following, if known: a) Hours of Operation 6:30 am to 6:00 pm, Monday through Friday. b) Childcare capacity proposed (number of children to be served at this proposed site). The applicant has said the capacity is 50 children. Thank you, Melodie Hanson 5624 Nevada Ave N Crystal, MN 55428 763-291-8413 EXISTING 8'-0" HIGH CEDAR BOARD FENCE EXISTING 8'-0" HIGH CEDAR BOARD FENCE NEW 6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE NEW 1,500 SF PLAY GROUND NEW PLAYGROUND STORAGE SHED- MIN. 3' FROM PROPERTY LINE (6) NEW STAFF PARKING SPACES (15) EXISTING PARKING STALLS TRASH ENCLOSURE TO BE PRE-FAB STORAGE SHED NEW 6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE DATE:SHEET NO: BASS LAKE CHILDCARE 7200 BASS LAKE ROAD CRYSTAL, MN SITE-01Rev1 24 APR 2019 PROJECT:PROPOSED CHILDCARE PLAYGROUND 6730 151st STREET SAVAGE, MN 55378 PH: 952-240-7050 WWW.CREADORARCH.COM Attachment G IRON HORSE ADDITION – PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PAGE 1 OF 5 _____________________________________________________________________ FROM: Dan Olson, City Planner ____________________________________________________________________ TO: Planning Commission (for May 13 Meeting) DATE: May 7, 2019 RE: PUBLIC HEARING - Subdivision request (Preliminary Plat) by the City of Crystal for Iron Horse Addition (Application Number 2019-06) A. BACKGROUND On March 5, 2019 the City Council determined that the west end of Iron Horse Park is surplus land and that it should be subdivided and sold for construction of three new single-family homes. Proceeds from the sale of the lots will be used to fund park improvements. The plat creating these lots is named Iron Horse Addition and the site is zoned Low Density Residential (R-1). Notice of the May 13 public hearing was published in the Sun Post on May 2 and mailed to owners within 500 feet (attachment A). A hearing notice was also sent to the City of New Hope since the property is adjacent to the New Hope/Crystal boundary line. Attachments: A. Site location and public hearing notice mailing map B. Existing zoning map C. Windsor Ridge plat in New Hope D. Proposed Iron Horse Addition preliminary plat B. PROPOSED PROPERTY SUBDIVISION Existing use With the exception of a backstop for a ballfield, the western area of Ironhorse Park is a vacant area of the park, which is addressed as 5155 Kentucky Avenue North. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Proposed Iron Horse Addition Preliminary Plat IRON HORSE ADDITION – PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PAGE 2 OF 5 Proposed use Because of the City Council determination that part of the park is surplus land, the city is replatting Lots 1-5, Block 1, Jayflo Subdivision into the Iron Horse Addition which will have three lots for new home construction and a dedicated park parcel for Iron Horse Park. The three new single-family homes are to be addressed as 5160, 5168 and 5176 Louisiana Avenue North. The rest of the platted area will be dedicated on the plat as park land and will be addressed as 5180 Kentucky Avenue North. The homes within the Iron Horse Addition will be developed in coordination with the Windsor Ridge single-family home development located in New Hope, just west of Iron Horse Park (attachment C). The Windsor Ridge plat was recently approved by the New Hope City Council. Parcel Area Details 156,275 sq. ft. (3.6 acres) Total area to be replatted 122,123 sq. ft (2.8 acres) Area for Iron Horse Park (platted park land) - 3,555 sq. ft. (0.08 acre) Right-of-way for Louisiana Avenue = 34,152 sq. ft. (0.8 acre) Area remaining for the three new lots 14,982 sq. ft. (0.3 acre) Lot 1 (new 5160 Louisiana) 10,260 sq. ft. (0.2 acre) Lot 2 (new 5168 Louisiana) 8,910 sq. ft. (0.2 acre) Lot 3 (new 5176 Louisiana) Subdivision design features The proposed plat would be named Iron Horse Addition. The following are the notable design features of this subdivision: 1. Zoning Requirements  Building setbacks – Any homes on these three proposed properties will meet the setbacks required for the R-1 district, which are 30 feet for the front and rear property lines. Side setbacks will be controlled by the five foot drainage and utility easements. No part of the homes, including eaves, may be located within a drainage and utility easement.  Lot size and area – The proposed lots meets the minimum lot area (6,000 sq. ft.), width (50’), and depth (100’) requirements of the R-1 district. For lots located on a curve, such as the lots in the Iron Horse Addition plat, lot width is measured at the front setback line.  Residential density. The area included in the Iron Horse Addition will have a required maximum gross density of no more than six units per gross acre. “Gross” includes public areas such as street right-of-ways in the IRON HORSE ADDITION – PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PAGE 3 OF 5 density calculation. In the case of the Iron Horse Addition, gross density is calculated as follows:  34,152 sq. ft – Total area to be replatted for residential use  3,555 sq. ft. – The portion of the new Louisiana Avenue right-of- way east of the centerline  37,707 sq. ft (0.86 acres) - Total area included in the density calculation. Gross density is calculated by dividing 3 housing units by 0.86 acres  3.5 units per gross acre for Iron Horse Addition 2. Street and Pedestrian Access  Street access – Louisiana Avenue North currently is a dead-end where it meets the park boundary, but the street will be extended southward to provide curb cut access for these three lots. The street pavement will be 28 feet in width. The eastern half of the street right-of-way is being dedicated with the Iron Horse Addition plat, and the western half is dedicated with the Windsor Ridge plat.  Pedestrian connections – There is not a sidewalk accessing these three lots, but a new sidewalk will be constructed along the eastern side of extended Louisiana Avenue in front of these homes. This sidewalk was required by the City of New Hope for the Windsor Ridge development. 3. Utilities The proposed new homes will connect with existing water and proposed sanitary sewer mains. These utilities will either be installed by the developer of the Windsor Ridge development or separately by the City of Crystal or its contractor. There are existing overhead private utility lines on the along the park’s north property line. New drainage and utility easements are dedicated with this new plat. New private utility services to the new homes, such as Xcel Energy, Century Link and Comcast, will be buried underground. 4. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control – The city does not require a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for parcels under one acre in size. However during home construction, the city will require erosion control techniques to be used on-site including silt fences and inlet protection. 5. Landscaping – There are several existing trees in the Louisiana Avenue street right-of-way. These trees will be removed so that the street may be extended southward for the Windsor Ridge development. The UDC requires the builder to plant one new tree in the front yard of the new Crystal homes. 6. Park dedication – Because net revenue from the lot sales will go into the Parks Capital Fund, and park dedication fees are deposited into the same fund, the park dedication requirement is already being met. C. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA The following are the relevant criteria for approval of subdivisions in city code section 510.25. IRON HORSE ADDITION – PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PAGE 4 OF 5 1. The proposed subdivision must be in compliance with the provisions of this UDC. Findings: The proposed subdivision meets UDC requirements. 2. The proposed subdivision must be in accordance with the objectives of the city’s comprehensive plan. Findings: The proposed subdivision meets the density requirements of the low density residential land use category. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and sedimentation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention, must be such that the site is suitable for the type of development of uses contemplated. Findings: The characteristics of the site are conducive to the construction of three new single-family homes. D. REQUESTED ACTION Staff is recommending approval of the Iron Horse Addition preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. Overhead utilities. If the overhead utility lines on these properties are relocated or extended, the lines shall be buried underground. New private utilities, such as Xcel Energy, Center Point Energy, or Comcast shall be buried underground. Under no circumstances shall additional overhead utilities be installed, whether main lines, feeder lines or service lines to the new houses. 2. Compliance. Development of the plat is subject to the applicable requirements of the Crystal City Code. The applicant is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances in developing the plat and is required to obtain such other permits and permissions as may be required. 3. No Waiver. Failure by the City to take action with respect to any violation of any condition, covenant or term of this plat approval shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such condition, covenant, or term or any subsequent violation of the same or any other condition, covenant, or term. 4. Binding Effect. The conditions placed on this preliminary approval are binding on the applicant, its successors and assigns, shall run with the property, and shall not in any way be affected by the subsequent sale, lease, or other change from current ownership. The obligations of the applicant under this approval shall also be the obligations of the current and any subsequent owners of the property. IRON HORSE ADDITION – PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PAGE 5 OF 5 5. Acceptance of Conditions. Utilization of the property for any of the uses allowed by this preliminary approval shall automatically be deemed acceptance of, and agreement to, the terms and conditions without qualification, reservation, or exception City Council action is anticipated on May 21, 2019. Site Location and Public Hearing Notice Mailing Map 5155 Kentucky Ave. N 4141 Douglas Dr. N. Crystal MN 55422 Attachment A Zoning Map 5155 Kentucky Ave. N 4141 Douglas Dr. N. Crystal MN 55422 Attachment B IRON HORSE PARK-0+500+001 + 0 0 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+0014+0015+0015+00-0+500+0013+36.6915+00GF 897.0 LO 893.0 GF 896.2 LO 892.2 GF 897.5 LO 893.5 GF 898.0 LO 894.0 GF 898.5 LO 894.5 GF 899.5 LO 895.5 GF 900.0 LO 896.0 GF 901.5 LO 897.5 GF 902.5 LO 897.5 GF 904.5 LO 896.5 GF 905.5 LO 897.5 GF 907.0 LO 899.0903.0 GF 908.0 LO 904.0GF 909 .5LO 906 .0 GF 906.0 LO 900.0 904.0 GF 905.0 LO 899.0 GF 903.0 LO 899.0 GF 902.0 LO 899.0 GF 900.5 LO 899.0 GF 900.0 LO 899.0 GF 899.0 LO 899.0 GF 899.0 LO 899.0 GF 899.0 LO 899.0 GF 898.0 LO 898.0 GF 897.0 LO 897.0 GF 895.5 LO 895.5 GF 895.0 LO 895.0 GF 894.0 LO 894.0 GF 893.5 LO 889.5 GF 907.5 LO 906.5 GF 910.0LO906.0910.051st Ave NG F 9 0 8 . 5 L O 9 0 4 . 5 28' F-F 50' ROW RETENTION POND 1 INFILTRATION POND 40' 40' 25' 25' 25' 25' CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 02 /07 / 2019 8:51 AMW:\2018\18611\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\SITE PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS 3335 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N CRYSTAL, MN 55427 SVK DEVELOPMENT NEW HOPE, MN WINDSOR RIDGE 02/08/19 CITY SUBMITTAL COVER SHEETC0-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS &C1-1 DEMOLITION PLAN SITE PLANC2-1 GRADING PLANC3-1 SWPPP & NOTESC3-2 - C3-3 UTILITY PLANC4-1 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN C4-2 - C4-3 DETAILSC8-1 - C8-2 LANDSCAPE PLANL1-1 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 20383 18611 TWM ZHW TWM 02/08/19 STREET & STORM SEWER PLAN C5-1 - C5-3 PRELI MI N A R Y N SCALE IN FEET 0 60 120 PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLAN C2-1 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SITE BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PENNSYLVANIA AVE. AND OREGON AVE. AS SHOWN HEREON. ELEVATION = 909.89 (NGVD 29) WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. PROJECT BENCHMARK 1. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 5. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 6. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET(S) OF THE PROJECT PLANS. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9. ALL ENTRANCES AND CONNECTIONS TO CITY STREETS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND NOTIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. 10.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. 11.ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 12.EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATED 01/08/19. 13.THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. 14.A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. GENERAL NOTES SURVEYOR:OWNER/DEVELOPER: Loucks Associates, Inc.SVK Development 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 3335 Pennsylvania Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55330 Crystal, MN 55427 763-424-5505 612-760-8660 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 118 North, Range 21 West lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly line of the Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste Marie Railroad right of way. (Torrens Property) AND All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 118, Range 21, lying North of the Soo Line Right of Way, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Abstract Property) Property is Abstract & Torrens - Certificate No. 1477297 DATE OF PREPARATION: January 31, 2019 BENCHMARK: MNDOT GSID STA. #81614, 2734 AG 1.0 mile west of Crystal, in the sidewalk in the southwest corner of North Broadway Bridge # 27170 over Trunk Hwy 100, 0.2 mile east along C. R. 81 from the junction of Trunk Hwy 100 and C. R. 81 in Crystal, then 0.1 mile south on C. R. 9 (42nd Ave. N.), then 0.3 mile west on C. R. 8 (West Broadway), 2.0 ft north of a bridge railing. Elevation = 880.808 FT (NGVD'29) SITE BENCHMARK: Top nut of hydrant located at southeast corner of Louisiana Avenue N. & Soo Line Place, as shown hereon. Elevation = 887.52 FT (NGVD'29) EXISTING ZONING: Zone (R-1) PROPOSED ZONING: Zone (PUD) AREAS: Total Property Area = 379,919 +/- Sq.Ft. or 8.72 +/- Acres Right of way Dedication Area = 63,618 +/- Sq.Ft. or 1.46 +/- Acres Net Property Area = 316,301 +/- Sq.Ft. or 7.26 +/- Acres PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS: Front = 25-45 Feet Side (House) = 10 Feet Side (Garage)= 5 Feet Rear = 25 Feet FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: This property is contained in Zone X (area of minimal flooding) per Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0211F, Community Panel No. 270177 0211 F, effective date of November 4, 2016 and Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0192F, Community Panel No. 270177 0192 F, effective date of November 4, 2016. PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES - UNLESS NOTED, BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION FOR FULL BASEMENT IS 8.0 FEET BELOW THE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION. - MINIMUM BASEMENT ELEVATION REFLECTS LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATIONS STREET NOTES: SETBACK REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTED HOUSE PAD LIMITS 10' SIDE HOUSE / 5' SIDE GARAGE 25' REAR HOUSE LOT NUMBER 25' FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT CATCH BASIN STREETSETBACK REQUIREMENT LOT CORNER BLOCK NUMBER 913.0 917.0 GRADE AT REAR OF HOUSE PAD (LOWEST OPENING) LOT EASEMENTS 5' MIN. SIDE/REAR HOUSE 10' MIN. FRONT 25' MIN. CORNER PUD SETBACKS LOT 1-16 BLOCK FRONT REAR SIDE 1 2 3-16 1 2 2 2 25 40 40 25 25 25 25 25 5/10 5/10 5/10 5/10 LOT WIDTH MINIMUM 65' Attachment C 890.3891.4881.6882.4884.1tcc883.94tcc884.30tcc884.34tcc884.06883.3883.6883.7883.5883.6883.9883.6883.4883.3PowerPolePowerPolePowerPole910.2885.5891.1GuyAnchor885.9886.4887.3887.3887.0885.5885.3884.7885.2885.0885.4884.6884.5883.9883.4882.9882.7883.6883.9884.2884.1884.4884.3884.3884.3884.4884.5884.7884.6884.4884.4883.7883.7883.8884.0884.9884.3883.3883.0885.3886.0886.9887.6888.1887.5887.9888.3888.3885.9886.6885.1883.8883.6883.2883.1883.3883.5back stop fenc eO v e r h e a d W i r e sGarageShedGarageShedConcrete curb 52ND AVE. N.LOUISIANA AVE. N.SOO LINE PLACELOUISIANA AVE. N.SOO LINE R.R.CENTERLINE OF RAILROAD TRACKSWEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 8, TWP. 118, R.21F e n c e(unimproved)F e n c e50.00found monumentfound monument(Unimproved)T r e e L i n e 886888890 KENTUCKY AVE. S.SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 8, TWP. 118, R.2124.0 6030F e n c e163.1416.00 16 24NORTH LINE OF SOO LINE RAILROAD50.00JERSEY AVE. S.S 89°59'24" E 848.95N 00°17'35" W 129.02N 82°35'35" E 855.24N 00°14'54" W 239.24 683.95135.00N 00°14'54" W 217.81110.00 66.0041.81166.30S 63°18'29" E 151.43S 89°59'24" E 135.0042.00 66.00N 00°14'54" W 108.00 30.0051STAVE. N.321LOUISIANA AVE. N.P A R K1F e n c eF e n c eB i t u m i n o u s Hockey Boards BituminousConcrete CurbConcrete CurbConcrete CurbPlayground EquipmentAreatimbers O v e r h e a d W i r e s O v e r h e a d W i r e s O v e r h e a d W i r e sO v e r h e a d W i r e s5555510105 5F e n c e884886 884884882882884886888683.95128.88101.71 128.9025N 45°20'10" E42.008.6510F e n c e tree 12"885.4tree 12"885.2tree 14"884.8tree 12"885.2Adjoining Owner:City of New Hope4401 Xylon Ave. N.New Hope, MN 55428 Adjoining Owner: Clean Cut Properties 5153 Idaho Ave. N. Crystal, MN 55428 Adjoining Owner:Donald Kitzman7023 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:Lori Ulick7017 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:Mike & Christa McKibben7011 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:Larry Carlson7005 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:Steven & Karen Grotting7105 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428"Iron Horse Park"HydrantAdjoining Owner:Brent Juusola6919 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:Michael Kurian6913 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:Matthew Prow6907 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:P P Croce6901 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:Jamie Haar6823 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:Beth Higman6917 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428Adjoining Owner:K A Bungert6811 52nd Ave.. N.Crystal, MN 55428LightPoleLightPolePowerPoleBUILDING LightPolePowerPolePowerPoleLightPolemonument signSignSignSignSignSignSignBenches on ConcreteTable on Conc.Basketball HoopBasketball Hoop2.6TNH=887.52F:\survey\jayflo subdivision - hennepin\1-2-3-4-5-1\01 Surveying - 88353A\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwgF.B. No. 1109-08 inv. 88353ALots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, JAYFLO SUBDIVISION, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situatein Hennepin County, Minnesota and the vacated South 16 feet of Soo Line Place lying adjacent thereto alsovacated Louisiana Avenue dedicated in said JAYFLO SUBDIVISION.Legal description and easements, if any per Title Commitment from Old Republic National Title InsuranceCompany, File No. ORTE745560, dated March 12, 2019.Total Area of Parcel = 156275 sq.ftMN 1MN 2MN 3 Legal DescriptionMiscellaneous NotesFile No.I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LandSurveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Prepared March 9, 2019.REVISED April 15, 2019.SignedGregory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992CITY OF CRYSTAL4141 Douglas Drive, Crystal, MN 55422PRELIMINARY PLAT PREPARED FORIRON HORSE ADDITIONPRELIMINARY PLAT MN 4PROPOSED LOT INFORMATIONProposed Number of Lots = 3Area of Lot 1, Block 1 = 14982 sq.ftArea of Lot 2, Block 1 = 10260 sq.ftArea of Lot 3, Block 1 = 8910 sq.ftArea of Right of Way dedication = 3555 sq.ftOwner and Developer:Property is in Flood Zone "X" (an area of minimal flooding) per FEMA Map No. 27053C0211F, dated November 4, 2016.ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND STANDARDS:Current and Proposed Zoning - R-1, Low Density Residential Setback Requirements per Zoning Ordinance: Main Structure OnlyFront - 30 feetInterior Side - 5 feetCorner Side Street - 10 feetRear - 30 feet (refer to City Code for more specifics)Minimum Lot Requirements:Lot Area - 6000 sq.ftLot Width - 50 feetLot Depth - 100 feetBuilding Height - 2 stories or 32 feet, whichever is lessMN 5Property located in Section 8, Township 118, Range 21,Hennepin County, Minnesota.Dimensions shown subject to change with approval of final survey.MN 67601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428(763) 560-3093DemarcInc.comPersonnel & Contact InformationParts Soo Line Place and Louisiana Ave. N. to be vacated and portion of Louisiana Ave. N. to be rededicated on final plat.MN 7Legend of Symbols and AbbreviationsDenotes Found Iron MonumentDenotes Iron Monument SetBollardLightPower PoleManholeCatch BasinDenotes Existing ContoursBasis of bearings based on County Coordinates from Hennepin CountyPrepared By:DemarcLand Surveying & Engineering7601 73rd Avenue N.Brooklyn Park, MN 55428phone 763-560-3093gregprasch@DemarcInc.comFenceOverhead WiresZoning & Development InformationMN 8City of Crystal, Hennepin County, MNBENCHMARKAttachment D 3501 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH – REZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PAGE 1 OF 2 _______________________________________________________________ FROM: Dan Olson, City Planner ____________________________________________________________________ TO: Planning Commission (for May 13 Meeting) DATE: May 7, 2019 RE: Consider recommendation for a proposed specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Drive North (Application Number 2019-04) A. BACKGROUND On April 8, 2019 the Crystal Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application. After the public hearing was conducted and closed, the Commission voted 5-2 to deny the application and continue the item to May 13, 2019 so that the city attorney could prepare written findings (rationale) for denial to be considered by the Commission. Staff Report Attachments: A. Proposed Planning Commission resolution - denial B. Proposed Planning Commission resolution – approval C. Letter from A-1’s attorney relating to city’s rezoning decision Attachments A and B are proposed Planning Commission resolutions for recommending either denial or approval of the rezoning request. Attachment C is a letter from the applicant’s attorney relating to the city’s rezoning decision. The city attorney will be present at the May 13th meeting to answer questions the Commission may have about this letter. Before the May 13th meeting a notice was mailed to the same property owners who received the public hearing notice providing details of upcoming meetings related to this application. B. REQUESTED ACTION The Planning Commission has three options to consider in making a recommendation to the City Council on A-1’s rezoning request: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Proposed Specialized Care Facility 3501 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH – REZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 1. Recommend Denial. Based on the action taken by the Planning Commission on April 8, 2019, the Commission could adopt a resolution recommending denial of the rezoning (attachment A). 2. Recommend Approval. The Commission could adopt a resolution recommending approval of the rezoning (attachment B). Staff recommends the following conditions be made part of any approval: 1. Site Plan. The development shall be constructed according to the site plan in attachment F of the staff report. Prior to disturbing the site, the applicant shall: a. Receive approval by the City Council of lot consolidation and easement vacation applications to combine the applicant’s six properties at 3449, 3501, and 3505 Douglas Drive and 3442, 3456, and 3500 Edgewood Avenue into one parcel, vacate drainage and utility easements, and provide new easements on the final plat document. b. Receive approval of the stormwater management plan by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. c. Sign a site improvement agreement with the city and provide an escrow to guarantee installation of the parking lot, infiltration basin, and landscaping plan. 2. Security personnel. The applicant shall retain qualified security personnel who are employed by a private or public security company for the building at 3503 Douglas Drive, with one such person on site at any given time. 3. Rental license and inspection. Before A-1 receives a certificate of occupancy from the city for the specialized care facility, they shall secure a rental license from the city, and renew this license annually as required by the city. The required rental licensing shall be the same as for a 30- unit multiple-family apartment dwelling, which includes an inspection to verify that the facility meets the property maintenance regulations of Crystal city code section 425, as may be amended by the City Council. 4. Building permit. The applicant shall apply for a building permit for the proposed building within one year from the date of City Council decision. The applicant may request a one-year extension from the City Council of this deadline date. 3. No Recommendation. If neither resolution is adopted to recommend denial or approval, then the Commission should approve a motion to forward the application to the City Council without a recommendation. C. NEXT STEPS City Council consideration is anticipated on May 21, 2019. If the Council approves first reading of the rezoning ordinance, then second reading would be considered at a future regularly scheduled Council meeting in which the lot consolidation and easement vacation requests will also be considered. 1 CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2019-01 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE REZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND DISAPPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN WHEREAS, A-1 Reliable Home Care (“Applicant”) submitted an application to the City of Crystal (“City”) to rezone the property located at 3501 Douglas Drive North in Crystal, which is legally described in Exhibit A (“Property”), to Planned Development (C-PD); and WHEREAS, the Applicant has also submitted, and is seeking approval of, a site plan to construct a specialized care facility on the Property as provided in Crystal city code, subsection 510.17; and WHEREAS, the Property consists of six parcels that the Applicant is also proposing to replat into a single parcel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Applicant’s requests on April 8, 2019, which was continued until May 13, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines as follows with respect to the requested approvals: 1. A portion of the Property is currently zoned Commercial (C) and the other portion ofthe Property is currently zoned Low Density Residential (R-1); 2. The properties surrounding the Property are primarily zoned R-1, with some R-2; 3. The Comprehensive Plan designates a portion of the Property for neighborhood commercial and the other portion for medium density residential; 4. The request to rezone to C-PD is subject to the procedures set out in Crystal city code, subsections 510.29 and 510.31; 5. Under Crystal city code, subsection 510.29, subd. 3, when reviewing a rezoning request the following three criteria are, at a minimum, to be considered:(a)The specific policies and recommendations of the comprehensive plan and othercity plans; (b)The purpose and intent of this UDC, or in the case of a map amendment, whether it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district; and (c)If applicable, the adequacy of a buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. Attachment A 2 6. As to the policies and recommendations of the comprehensive plan, the Planner’s Report points out that the 2030 Comprehensive Plan prohibits the rezoning of the Property unless the City Council determines that the request is fully consistent with certain guidelines. While the Planner’s Report recommends finding that the requested rezoning is consistent with the guidelines, the Planning Commission disagrees. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that, with respect to the guideline requiring the development to be compatible with adjacent land uses and systems, the proposed rezoning and resulting use of the Property would not be compatible with the residential character of the area. The guideline specifically expresses a preference for townhome structures with separate private entrances and disfavors apartment-style buildings as is being proposed. Additionally, the guidelines expressly prohibit commercial uses that are incompatible with adjacent land uses. The Commission heard from a number of residents at the neighborhood meeting and the public hearing that the proposed use is incompatible with the surrounding residential uses. The Planning Commission agrees that rezoning the Property would produce a use that is incompatible with the current residential uses and with how the area is guided for the future. In the plan the City expressly reserved for itself the discretion to deny any development application that it determines to be incompatible with the guiding principles; 7. The above findings also speak to the second rezoning criteria. For the same reasons the Planning Commission finds the requested rezoning to not be consistent with the purpose and intent of the UDC or the surrounding properties; 8. While the Planning Commission heard public comment in opposition to the proposed use, the public comment is not the sole basis for this recommendation. The Planning Commission understands that while public opposition can be considered, it cannot constitute the sole basis for a zoning decision. In this case, the Planning Commission determines the rezoning request does not satisfy criteria the City Council established for itself when making these legislative decisions; 9. A rezoning request is a legislative decision that is left to the broad discretion of the City Council. The City Council’s decision must be upheld unless it is proven to be “unsupported by any rational basis related to promoting the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare.” State, by Rochester Association of Neighborhoods v. City of Rochester, 268 N.W.2d 885, 888 (1978). Furthermore a “city council has broad discretion in legislative matters, and even if the city council's decision is debatable, so long as there is a rational basis for what it does, the courts do not interfere.” Honn v. City of Coon Rapids, 313 N.W.2d 409, 415 (Minn. 1981); and 10. Having found the requested rezoning is not consistent with the guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan or the criteria in the Code, the Planning Commission recommends that the requested rezoning be denied and, therefore, also recommends denial of the site plan proposed for the use. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Crystal, based on the record of this matter and the findings and determinations contained herein, hereby recommends the City Council deny the Applicant’s request to rezone the Property to Planned Development and further recommends that the site plan to allow for the construction of a specialized care facility on the Property be disapproved as it proposes a use that is not allowed without rezoning. Adopted by the Crystal Planning Commission this 13th day of May, 2019. ____________________________ Chair, Crystal Planning Commission 4 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Douglas Medical Plaza, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Parcel 2: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Douglas Plaza Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Parcel 3: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Andersons Gardendale Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1 CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2019-01 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL OF REZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN WHEREAS, A-1 Reliable Home Care (“Applicant”) submitted an application to the City of Crystal (“City”) to rezone the property located at 3501 Douglas Drive North in Crystal, which is legally described in Exhibit A (“Property”), to Planned Development (C-PD); and WHEREAS, the Applicant has also submitted, and is seeking approval of, a site plan to construct a specialized care facility on the Property as provided in Crystal city code, subsection 510.17; and WHEREAS, the Property consists of six parcels that the Applicant is also proposing to replat into a single parcel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Applicant’s requests on April 8, 2019, which was continued to May 13, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines as follows with respect to the requested approvals: 1.A portion of the Property is currently zoned Commercial (C) and the other portion of the Property is currently zoned Low Density Residential (R-1); 2.The properties surrounding the Property are primarily zoned R-1, with some R-2; 3.The Comprehensive Plan designates a portion of the Property for neighborhood commercial and the other portion for medium density residential; 4.The request to rezone to C-PD is subject to the procedures set out in Crystal city code, subsections 510.29 and 510.31; 5.Under Crystal city code, subsection 510.29, subd. 3, when reviewing a rezoning request the following three criteria are, at a minimum, to be considered: (a)The specific policies and recommendations of the comprehensive plan and other city plans; (b)The purpose and intent of this UDC, or in the case of a map amendment, whether it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district; and (c)If applicable, the adequacy of a buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts; Attachment B 2 6.As to the policies and recommendations of the comprehensive plan, the Planner’s Report points out that the 2030 Comprehensive Plan prohibits the rezoning of the Property unless the City Council determines that the request is fully consistent with certain guidelines for the potential redevelopment area that the Applicant’s site is located in. The Planning Commission agrees with the findings in the Planner’s Report which finds that the requested rezoning is consistent with these guidelines; 7.The above findings also speak to the second rezoning criteria. For the same reasons the Planning Commission finds the requested rezoning to be consistent with the purpose and intent of the UDC or the surrounding properties, including that the rezoning to Planned Development meets the Development Standards for Planned Developments in Crystal city code, subsection 515.13; 8.Deciding whether to rezone property is a policy question that requires the City to exercise its legislative discretion; and 9.The Planning Commission also finds that the proposed site plan is consistent with the UDC and recommends the City Council approve it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Crystal, based on the record of this matter and the findings and determinations contained herein, hereby recommends approval of the Applicant’s request to rezone the Property to Planned Development and further recommends approval of the site plan to allow for the construction of a specialized care facility on the Property. Adopted by the Crystal Planning Commission this 13th day of May, 2019. ____________________________ Chair, Crystal Planning Commission 3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Douglas Medical Plaza, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Parcel 2: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Douglas Plaza Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Parcel 3: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Andersons Gardendale Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ^HELLMUTH JOHNSON .'.^ ATTORNEYS AT LAW WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL No.: (952) 746-2198 E-MAIL: MKLEMM@HJLAWFIRM.COM MSBA BOARD CERTIFIED SPECIALIST REAL PROPERTT LAW April 23,2019 Kennedy & Graven Attn: Troy J. Gilchrist 470 US Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: A-l Reliable Home Care Inc. Our File No.: 27907.0001 Dear Mr. Gilchrist: Via e-mail and U.S, Mail t ilchrist dr kenned - raven.com City of Crystal (the "City") This firm represents A-l Reliable Home Care Inc. ("A-1") in connection with its application for rezoning to Planned Development for a proposed specialized care facility at 3501 Douglas Drive North (Application No. 2019-04). Based on my review of the Planning Commission packet and audio recording of the April 8, 2019, public hearing, it appears that the Planning Commission intends to recommend denial of the application on a discriminatory basis in violation of the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. As noted in the Staff Report, A-l is proposing to construct a new specialized care facility to provide housing for individuals with brain injuries and individuals with diagnosed mental health conditions. The facility would be registered as a "housing with services establishment" under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 144D and would be regulated by the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services. As described in the Staff Report, the portion of the property facing Douglas Drive is zoned Commercial (C), while the rear of the property is zone Low Density Residential (R-l). Specialized care facilities are a permitted use in the Commercial zoning district. A-l is proposing to consolidate the lots into one parcel and rezone the property to Planned Development (C - PD), with an underlying zoning of Commercial, to allow more than one principal building on the property. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan designates the site as a redevelopment area called Special Area Plan B, and City Staff determined that the proposed specialized care facility meets the requirements of the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, including the guidelines for Special Area Plan B. The Staff Report recommends approval of the rezoning to Planned Development, subject to five conditions of approval, including a requirement that A-l obtain a rental license from the City. 8050 West 78th Street, Edina, MN 55439 T 952-941-4005 F 9 52-941-2 33 7 www.hjlawfirm corn Attachment C Kennedy & Graven Attn: Troy J. Gilchrist April 23, 2019 Page 2 The public hearing lasted for approximately two hours, and the questions and concerns raised by Planning Commission members and neighborhood residents focused on fears and concerns related to the disability of the individuals who would be served by the proposed housing. For example, there were extensive questions and comments regarding administration of medication, staffing, security systems and procedures to prevent escape, and the safety of women and children in the neighborhood. Following the public hearing, a motion was made and seconded to continue and deny the application and to direct the City Planner and the City Attorney to prepare findings to support a recommendation for denial at the May 13 meeting. The Planning Commission's discussion of the basis for denial consisted solely of the following statement: I'm just going to say that at this time, I think with the amount of concerns that the residents, and just the fact that so many of the residents have shown up with concerns about the facility and a lot if it can't be answered yet because it is so much details that they haven't been able to answer because they are like, well we are not that far yet, it is just not wise for us to approve this facility yet." The motion was approved by a five-to-two vote. Based on the public record, including the Planning Commission packet and the audio recording of the public hearing and Planning Commission deliberations, it is clear that discrimination on the basis of disability is a motivating factor (and apparently the sole factor) in the Planning Commission's proposed recommendation for denial of A-l 's application for rezoning. Please find enclosed a copy of the Joint Statement of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Department of Justice Regarding State and Local Land Use Laws and Practices and the Application of the Fair Housing Act, dated November 10, 2016. As noted on page 5 of the Joint Statement: When enacting or applying zoning or land use laws, state and local governments may not act because of the fears, prejudices, stereotypes, or unsubstantiated assumptions that community members may have about current or prospective residents because of the residents' protected characteristics. In the event that the City denies A-1's application, we will advise our client regarding legal remedies and alternatives under the Fair Housing Act and other applicable laws. As noted in the Joint Statement, the Fair Housing Act gives the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development the power to receive, investigate and conciliate complaints that a city has discriminated in exercising its land use and zoning powers, and after investigation, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development refers matters it believes may be meritorious to the U.S. Department of Justice. Kennedy & Graven Attn: Troy J. Gilchrist April 23, 2019 Page 3 As legal counsel for A-1, we truly hope that the City will not continue to be improperly influenced by the prejudice of its residents. We are hopeful that the City will do the right thing and will approve our client's application. Please contact me if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss this matter. Very truly yours, HELLMUTH & JOHNSON, PLLC /k^U^/^ - Michael D. Klemm Attorney at Law MDK/law Enc. ec: A-l Reliable Home Care Inc. (w/enc.) David G. Hellmuth, Esq. (w/o enc.) 27907.0001 -4115343 1 ^"T^'. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF FAIR HOUSING AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CIVIL RIGHTS DFVISION Washington, D.C. November 10, 2016 JOINT STATEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE STATE AND LOCAL LAND USE LAWS AND PRACTICES AND THE APPLICATION OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT INTRODUCTION The Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") are jointly responsible for enforcing the Federal Fair Housing Act ("the Act"),1 which prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status (children under 18 living with a parent or guardian), or national origin. The Act prohibits housing-related policies and practices that exclude or otherwise discriminate against individuals because of protected characteristics. The regulation of land use and zoning is traditionally reserved to state and local governments, except to the extent that it conflicts with requirements imposed by the Fair Housing Act or other federal laws. This Joint Statement provides an overview of the Fair Housing Act's requirements relating to state and local land use practices and zoning laws, including conduct related to group homes. It updates and expands upon DOJ's and HUD's Joint ' The Fair Housing Act is codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-19. The Act uses the term "handicap" instead of "disability." Both terms have the same legal meaning. See Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624, 631 (1998) (noting that the definition of "disability" in the Americans with Disabilities Act Statement on Group Homes, Local Land Use, and the Fair Housing Act, issued on August 18, 1999. The first section of the Joint Statement, Questions 1-6, describes generally the Act's requirements as they pertain to land use and zoning. The second and third sections. Questions 7- 25, discuss more specifically how the Act applies to land use and zoning laws affecting housing for persons with disabilities, including guidance on regulating group homes and the requirement to provide reasonable accommodations. The fourth section. Questions 26-27, addresses HUD's and DO J's enforcement of the Act in the land use and zoning context. This Joint Statement focuses on the Fair Housing Act, not on other federal civil rights laws that prohibit state and local governments from adopting or implementing land use and zoning practices that discriminate based on a protected characteristic, such as Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"),3 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("Section 504"),4 and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.5 In addition, the Jomt Statement does not address a state or local government's duty to affirmatively further fair housing, even though state and local governments that receive HUD assistance are subject to this duty. For additional information provided by DOJ and HUD regarding these issues, see the list of resources provided in the answer to Question 27. Questions and Answers on the Fair Housing Act and State and Local Land Use Laws and Zoning 1. How does the Fair Housing Act apply to state and local land use and zoning? The Fair Housing Act prohibits a broad range of housing practices that discriminate against individuals on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin (commonly referred to as protected characteristics). As established by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, federal laws such as the Fair Housing Act take precedence over conflicting state and local laws. The Fair Housing Act thus prohibits state and local land use and zoning laws, policies, and practices that discriminate based on a characteristic protected under the Act. Prohibited practices as defined in the Act include making unavailable or denying housing because of a protected characteristic. Housing includes not only buildings intended for occupancy as residences, but also vacant land that may be developed into residences. is drawn almost verbatim "from the definition of 'handicap' contained in the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988"). This document uses the term "disability," which is more generally accepted. 342U.S.C.§12132. 429U.S.C.§794. 5 42 U.S.C. § 2000d. 2. What types of land use and zoning laws or practices violate the Fair Housing Act? Examples of state and local land use and zoning laws or practices that may violate the Act include: . Prohibiting or restricting the development of housing based on the belief that the residents will be members of a particular protected class, such as race, disability, or familial status, by, for example, placing a moratoriiun on the development of multifamily housing because of concerns that the residents will include members of a particular protected class. . Imposing restrictions or additional conditions on group housing for persons with disabilities that are not imposed on families or other groups of unrelated individuals, by, for example, requiring an occupancy pennit for persons with disabilities to live in a single-family home while not requiring a pemiit for other residents of single-family homes. . Imposing restrictions on housing because of alleged public safety concerns that are based on stereotypes about the residents' or anticipated residents' membership in a protected class, by, for example, requiring a proposed development to provide additional security measures based on a belief that persons of a particular protected class are more likely to engage in criminal activity. . Enforcing otherwise neutral laws or policies differently because of the residents' protected characteristics, by, for example, citing individuals who are members of a particular protected class for violating code requirements for property upkeep while not citing other residents for similar violations. . Refusing to provide reasonable accommodations to land use or zoning policies when such accommodations may be necessary to allow persons with disabilities to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the housing, by, for example, denying a request to modify a setback requirement so an accessible sidewalk or ramp can be provided for one or more persons with mobility disabilities. 3. When does a land use or zoning practice constitute intentional discrimination in violation of the Fair Housing Act? Intentional discrimination is also referred to as disparate treatment, meaning that the action treats a person or group of persons differently because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin. A land use or zoning practice may be intentionally discriminatory even if there is no personal bias or animus on the part of individual government officials. For example, municipal zoning practices or decisions that reflect acquiescence to community bias may be intentionally discriminatory, even if the officials themselves do not personally share such bias. (See Q&A 5.) Intentional discrimination does not require that the decision-makers were hostile toward members of a particular protected class. Decisions motivated by a purported desire to benefit a particular group can also violate the Act if they result in differential treatment because of a protected characteristic. A land use or zoning practice may be discriminatory on its face. For example, a law that requu-es persons with disabilities to request pennits to live in single-family zones while not requiring persons without disabilities to request such permits violates the Act because it treats persons with disabilities differently based on their disability. Even a law that is seemingly neutral will still violate the Act if enacted with discriminatory mtent. In that instance, the analysis of whether there is intentional discrimination will be based on a variety of factors, all of which need not be satisfied. These factors include, but are not limited to: (1) the "impact" of the municipal practice, such as whether an ordinance disproportionately impacts minority residents compared to white residents or whether the practice perpetuates segregation in a neighborhood or particular geographic area; (2) the "historical background" of the action, such as whether there is a history of segregation or discriminatory conduct by the municipality; (3) the "specific sequence of events," such as whether the city adopted an ordinance or took action only after significant, racially-motivated community opposition to a housing development or changed course after learning that a development would include non-white residents; (4) departures from the "normal procedural sequence," such as whether a municipality deviated from normal application or zoning requirements; (5) "substantive departures," such as whether the factors usually considered important suggest that a state or local government should have reached a different result; and (6) the "legislative or administrative history," such as any statements by members of the state or local decision-making body. 4. Can state and local land use and zoning laws or practices violate the Fair Housing Act if the state or locality did not intend to discriminate against persons on a prohibited basis? Yes. Even absent a discriminatory intent, state or local governments may be liable under the Act for any land use or zoning law or practice that has an unjustified discriminatory effect because of a protected characteristic. In 2015, the United States Supreme Court affirmed this interpretation of the Act in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. The Court stated that "[t]hese unlawful practices include zoning laws and other housing restrictions that function unfairly to exclude minorities from certain neighborhoods without any sufficient justification."8 Vill. of Arlington Heights v. Metro. Hous. Dev. Corp., 429 U.S. 252,265-68(1977). ' _ u.s. _, 135 S. Ct. 2507 (2015). !/rf. at 2521-22. A land use or zoning practice results in a discriminatory effect if it caused or predictably will cause a disparate impact on a group of persons or if it creates, increases, reinforces, or perpetuates segregated housing patterns because of a protected characteristic. A state or local government still has the opportunity to show that the practice is necessary to achieve one or more of its substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests. These interests must be supported by evidence and may not be hypothetical or speculative. If these interests could not be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect, then the practice does not violate the Act. The standard for evaluating housing-related practices with a discriminatory effect are set forth in HUD's Discriminatory Effects Rule, 24 C.F.R § 100.500. Examples of land use practices that violate the Fair Housing Act under a discriminatory effects standard include minimum floor space or lot size requirements that increase the size and cost of housing if such an increase has the effect of excluding persons from a locality or neighborhood because of their membership in a protected class, without a legally sufficient justification. Similarly, prohibiting low-income or multifamily housing may have a discriminatory effect on persons because of their membership in a protected class and, if so, would violate the Act absent a legally sufficient justification. 5. Does a state or local government violate the Fair Housing Act if it considers the fears or prejudices of community members when enacting or applying its zoning or land use laws respecting housing? When enacting or applying zoning or land use laws, state and local governments may not act because of the fears, prejudices, stereotypes, or unsubstantiated assumptions that community members may have about current or prospective residents because of the residents' protected charactenstics. Doing so violates the Act, even if the officials themselves do not personally share such bias. For example, a city may not deny zoning approval for a low-income housing development that meets all zoning and land use requirements because the development may house residents of a particular protected class or classes whose presence, the community fears, will mcrease crime and lower property values in the surrounding neighborhood. Similarly, a local government may not block a group home or deny a requested reasonable accommodation in response to neighbors' stereotypical fears or prejudices about persons with disabilities or a particular type of disability. Of course, a city council or zoning board is not bound by everything that is said by every person who speaks at a public hearing. It is the record as a whole that will be determinative. 6. Can state and local governments violate the Fair Housing Act if they adopt or implement restrictions against children? Yes. State and local governments may not impose restrictions on where families with children may reside unless the resti-ictions are consistent with the "housing for older persons" exemption of the Act. The most common types of housing for older persons that may qualify for this exemption are: (1) housing intended for, and solely occupied by, persons 62 years of age or older; and (2) housing in which 80% of the occupied units have at least one person who is 55 years of age or older that publishes and adheres to policies and procedures demonstrating the intent to house older persons. These types of housing must meet all requirements of the exemption, including complying with HUD regulations applicable to such housing, such as verification procedures regarding the age of the occupants. A state or local government that zones an area to exclude families with children under 18 years of age must continually ensure that housing in that zone meets all requirements of the exemption. If all of the housing in that zone does not continue to meet all such requirements, that state or local government violates the Act. Questions and Answers on the Fair Housing Act and Local Land Use and Zoning Regulation of Group Homes 7. Who qualifies as a person with a disability under the Fair Housing Act? The Fair Housing Act defines a person with a disability to include (1) individuals with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; (2) individuals who are regarded as having such an impairment; and (3) individuals with a record of such an impairment. The term "physical or mental impairment" includes, but is not limited to, diseases and conditions such as orthopedic, visual, speech and hearing impairments, cerebral palsy, autism, epilepsy, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, HIV infection, developmental disabilities, mental ilkiess, dmg addiction (other than addiction caused by current, illegal use of a controlled substance), and alcoholism. The term "major life activity" includes activities such as seeing, hearing, walking breathing, performing manual tasks, caring for one's self, learning, speaking, and working. This list of major life activities is not exhaustive. Being regarded as having a disability means that the individual is treated as if he or she has a disability even though the individual may not have an impairment or may not have an impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. For example, if a landlord refuses to rent to a person because the landlord believes the prospective tenant has a disability, then the landlord violates the Act's prohibition on discrimination on the basis of disability, even if the prospective tenant does not actually have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. Having a record of a disability means the individual has a history of, or has been misclassified as having, a mental or physical impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. 8. What is a group home within the meaning of the Fair Housing Act? The term "group home" does not have a specific legal meaning; land use and zoning officials and the courts, however, have referred to some residences for persons with disabilities as group homes. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, and persons with disabilities have the same Fair Housing Act protections whether or not their housing is considered a group home. A household where two or more persons with disabilities choose to live together, as a matter of association, may not be subjected to requirements or conditions that are not imposed on households consisting of persons without disabilities. In this Statement, the term "group home" refers to a dwelling that is or will be occupied by unrelated persons with disabilities. Sometimes group homes serve individuals with a particular type of disability, and sometimes they serve individuals with a variety of disabilities. Some group homes provide residents with in-home support services of varying types, while others do not. The provision of support services is not required for a group home to be protected under the Fair Housing Act. Group homes, as discussed in this Statement, may be opened by individuals or by organizations, both for-profit and not-for-profit. Sometimes it is the group home operator or developer, rather than the individuals who live or are expected to live in the home, who interacts with a state or local government agency about developing or operating the group home, and sometimes there is no interaction among residents or operators and state or local governments. In this Statement, the term "group home" includes homes occupied by persons in recovery from alcohol or substance abuse, who are persons with disabilities under the Act. Although a group home for persons m recovery may commonly be called a "sober home," the term does not have a specific legal meaning, and the Act treats persons with disabilities who reside in such homes no differently than persons with disabilities who reside in other types of group homes. Like other group homes, homes for persons in recovery are sometimes operated by individuals or organizations, both for-profit and not-for-profit, and support services or supervision are sometimes, but not always, provided. The Act does not require a person who resides in a home for persons in recovery to have participated in or be currently participating in a substance abuse treatment program to be considered a person with a disability. The fact that a resident of a group home may currently be illegally using a conti-olled substance does not deprive the other residents of the protection of the Fair Housing Act. 9. In what ways does the Fair Housing Act apply to group homes? The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, and persons with disabilities have the same Fair Housing Act protections whether or not their housing is considered a group home. State and local governments may not discriminate against persons with disabilities who live in group homes. Persons with disabilities who live in or seek to live in group homes are sometimes subjected to unlawful discrimination in a number of ways, including those discussed in the preceding Section of this Joint Statement. Discrimination may be intentional; for example, a locality might pass an ordinance prohibiting group homes in single- family neighborhoods or prohibiting group homes for persons with certain disabilities. These ordinances are facially discriminatory, in violation of the Act. In addition, as discussed more fully in Q&A 10 below, a state or local government may violate the Act by refusing to grant a reasonable accommodation to its zoning or land use ordinance when the requested accommodation may be necessary for persons with disabilities to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. For example, if a locality refuses to waive an ordinance that limits the number of unrelated persons who may live in a single-family home where such a waiver may be necessary for persons with disabilities to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling, the locality violates the Act unless the locality can prove that the waiver would impose an undue financial and administrative burden on the local government or fundamentally alter the essential nature of the locality's zoning scheme. Furthermore, a state or local government may violate the Act by enacting an ordinance that has an unjustified discrfmmatory effect on persons with disabilities who seek to live m a group home in the community. Unlawful actions concerning group homes are discussed m more detail throughout this Statement. 10. What is a reasonable accommodation under the Fair Housing Act? The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to refuse to make "reasonable accommodations" to rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. A "reasonable accommodation" is a change, exception, or adjustment to a mle, policy, practice, or service that may be necessary for a person with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling, including public and common use spaces. Since rules, policies, practices, and services may have a different effect on persons with disabilities than on other persons, treating persons with disabilities exactly the same as others may sometimes deny them an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. Even if a zoning ordinance imposes on group homes the same restrictions that it imposes on housing for other groups of unrelated persons, a local government may be required, in individual cases and when requested to do so, to grant a reasonable accommodation to a group home for persons with disabilities. What constihites a reasonable accommodation is a case-by- case determination based on an individualized assessment. This topic is discussed in detail in Q&As 20-25 and in the HUD/DOJ Joint Statement on Reasonable Accommodations under the Fair Housing Act. 11. Does the Fair Housing Act protect persons with disabilities who pose a "direct threat" to others? The Act does not allow for the exclusion of individuals based upon fear, speculation, or stereotype about a particular disability or persons with disabilities in general. Nevertheless, the Act does not protect an individual whose tenancy would constitute a "direct threat" to the health or safety of other individuals or whose tenancy would result in substantial physical damage to the property of others unless the threat or risk to property can be eliminated or significantly reduced by reasonable accommodation. A determination that an individual poses a direct threat must rely on an individualized assessment that is based on reliable objective evidence (for example, current conduct or a recent history of overt acts). The assessment must consider: (1) the nature, duration, and severity of the risk of injury; (2) the probability that injury will actually occur; and (3) whether there are any reasonable accommodations that will eliminate or significantly reduce the direct threat. See Q&A 10 for a general discussion of reasonable accommodations. Consequently, in evaluating an individual's recent history of overt acts, a state or local government must take into account whether the individual has received intervening treatment or medication that has eliminated or significantly reduced the direct threat (in other words, significant risk of substantial harm). In such a situation, the state or local government may request that the individual show how the circumstances have changed so that he or she no longer poses a direct threat. Any such request must be reasonable and limited to information necessary to assess whether circumstances have changed. Additionally, in such a situation, a state or local government may obtain satisfactory and reasonable assurances that the individual will not pose a direct threat during the tenancy. The state or local government must have reliable, objective evidence that the tenancy of a person with a disability poses a direct threat before excluding him or her from housing on that basis, and, m making that assessment, the state or local government may not ignore evidence showing that the individual's tenancy would no longer pose a direct threat. Moreover, the fact that one individual may pose a direct threat does not mean that another individual with the same disability or other individuals in a group home may be denied housing. 12. Can a state or local government enact laws that specifically limit group homes for individuals with specific types of disabilities? No. Just as it would be illegal to enact a law for the purpose of excluding or limiting group homes for individuals with disabilities, it is illegal under the Act for local land use and zoning laws to exclude or limit group homes for individuals with specific types of disabilities. For example, a government may not limit group homes for persons with mental illness to certain neighborhoods. The fact that the state or local government complies with the Act with regard to group homes for persons with some types of disabilities will not justify discrimmation against individuals with another type of disability, such as mental illness. 13. Can a state or local government limit the number of individuals who reside in a group home in a residential neighborhood? Neutral laws that govern groups of unrelated persons who live together do not violate the Act so long as (1) those laws do not intentionally discriminate against persons on the basis of disability (or other protected class), (2) those laws do not have an unjustified discriminatory effect on the basis of disability (or other protected class), and (3) state and local governments make reasonable accommodations when such accommodations may be necessary for a person with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. Local zoning and land use laws that treat groups of unrelated persons with disabilities less favorably than similar groups of unrelated persons without disabilities violate the Fair Housing Act. For example, suppose a city's zoning ordinance defines a "family" to include up to a certain number of unrelated persons living together as a household unit, and gives such a group of unrelated persons the right to live m any zoning district without special permission from the city. If that ordinance also prohibits a group home having the same number of persons with disabilities in a certain district or requires it to seek a use permit, the ordinance would violate the Fair Housing Act. The ordinance violates the Act because it treats persons with disabilities less favorably than families and unrelated persons without disabilities. A local government may generally restrict the ability of groups of unrelated persons to live together without violating the Act as long as the restrictions are imposed on all such groups, including a group defined as a family. Thus, if the definition of a family includes up to a certain number of unrelated individuals, an ordmance would not, on its face, violate the Act if a group home for persons with disabilities with more than the pennitted number for a family were not allowed to locate in a single-family-zoned neighborhood because any group of unrelated people without disabilities of that number would also be disallowed. A facially neutral ordinance, however, still may violate the Act if it is intentionally discriminatory (that is, enacted with discriminatory intent or applied in a discriminatory manner), or if it has an unjustified 10 discriminatory effect on persons with disabilities. For example, an ordinance that limits the number of unrelated persons who may constitute a family may violate the Act if it is enacted for the purpose of limiting the number of persons with disabilities who may live in a group home, or if it has the unjustified discriminatory effect of excluding or limiting group homes in the jurisdiction. Governments may also violate the Act if they enforce such restrictions more strictly against group homes than against groups of the same number of unrelated persons without disabilities who live together in housing. In addition, as discussed in detail below, because the Act prohibits the denial of reasonable accommodations to rules and policies for persons with disabilities, a group home that provides housing for a number of persons with disabilities that exceeds the number allowed under the family definition has the right to seek an exception or waiver. If the criteria for a reasonable accommodation are met, the permit must be given in that instance, but the ordinance would not be invalid.9 14. How does the Supreme Court's ruling in Olmstead apply to the Fair Housing Act? In Olmstead v. L.C., the Supreme Court mled that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits the unjustified segregation of persons with disabilities in institutional settings where necessary services could reasonably be provided in integrated, community-based settings. An integrated setting is one that enables individuals with disabilities to live and interact with individuals without disabilities to the fullest extent possible. By contrast, a segregated setting includes congregate settings populated exclusively or primarily by individuals with disabilities. Although Olmstead did not interpret the Fair Housing Act, the objectives of the Fair Housing Act and the ADA, as interpreted in Olmstead, are consistent. The Fair Housing Act ensures that persons with disabilities have an equal opportunity to choose the housing where they wish to live. The ADA and Olmstead ensure that persons with disabilities also have the option to live and receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. The integration mandate of the ADA and Olmstead can be implemented without impairing the rights protected by the Fair Housing Act. For example, state and local governments that provide or fimd housing, health care, or support services must comply with the integration mandate by providing these programs, services, and activities in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of individuals with disabilities. State and local governments may comply with this requirement by adopting standards for the housing, health care, or support services they provide or fund that are reasonable, individualized, and specifically tailored to enable individuals with disabilities to live and interact with individuals without disabilities to the fullest extent possible. Local governments should be aware that ordinances and policies that impose additional restrictions on housing or residential services for persons with disabilities that are not imposed on housing or 9 »Laws that limit the number of occupants per unit do not violate the Act as long as they are reasonable, are applied to all occupants, and do not operate to discriminate on the basis of disability, familial status, or other characteristics protected by the Act. 10 527 U.S. 581 (1999). 11 residential services for persons without disabilities are likely to violate the Act. In addition, a locality would violate the Act and the integration mandate of the ADA and Olmstead if it required group homes to be concentrated in certain areas of the jurisdiction by, for example, restricting them from being located in other areas. 15. Can a state or local government impose spacing requirements on the location of group homes for persons with disabilities? A "spacing" or "dispersal" requirement generally refers to a requirement that a group home for persons with disabilities must not be located within a specific distance of another group home. Sometimes a spacing requirement is designed so it applies only to group homes and sometimes a spacing requirement is jframed more generally and applies to group homes and other types of uses such as boarding houses, student housing, or even certain types of businesses. In a community where a certain number of unrelated persons are permitted by local ordinance to reside together in a home, it would violate the Act for the local ordinance to impose a spacing requirement on group homes that do not exceed that pennitted number of residents because the spacing requirement would be a condition imposed on persons with disabilities that is not imposed on persons without disabilities. In situations where a group home seeks a reasonable accommodation to exceed the number of unrelated persons who are permitted by local ordinance to reside together, the Fair Housing Act does not prevent state or local governments from taking into account concerns about the over-concentration of group homes that are located m close proximity to each other. Sometimes compliance with the integration mandate of the ADA and Olmstead requires government agencies responsible for licensing or providing housing for persons with disabilities to consider the location of other group homes when determining what housing will best meet the needs of the persons being served. Some courts, however, have found that spacing requirements violate the Fair Housing Act because they deny persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to choose where they will live. Because an across-the-board spacing requirement may discriminate against persons with disabilities in some residential areas, any standards that state or local governments adopt should evaluate the location of group homes for persons with disabilities on a case-by-case basis. Where a jurisdiction has imposed a spacing requirement on the location of group homes for persons with disabilities, courts may analyze whether the requirement violates the Act under an intent, effects, or reasonable accommodation theory. In cases alleging intentional discrimination, courts look to a number of factors, including the effect of the requirement on housing for persons with disabilities; the jurisdiction's intent behind the spacing requirement; the existence, size, and location of group homes in a given area; and whether there are methods other than a spacing requirement for accomplishing the jurisdiction's stated purpose. A spacing requirement enacted with discrimmatory intent, such as for the purpose of appeasing neighbors' stereotypical fears about living near persons with disabilities, violates the Act. Further, a neutral 12 spacing requirement that applies to all housing for groups of unrelated persons may have an unjustified discriminatory effect on persons with disabilities, thus violating the Act. Jurisdictions must also consider, in compliance with the Act, requests for reasonable accommodations to any spacing reqmrements. 16. Can a state or local government impose health and safety regulations on group home operators? Operators of group homes for persons with disabilities are subject to applicable state and local regulations addressing health and safety concerns unless those regulations are inconsistent with the Fair Housing Act or other federal law. Licensing and other regulatory requirements that may apply to some group homes must also be consistent with the Fair Housing Act. Such regulations must not be based on stereotypes about persons with disabilities or specific types of disabilities. State or local zoning and land use ordinances may not, consistent with the Fair Housing Act, require individuals with disabilities to receive medical, support, or other services or supervision that they do not need or want as a condition for allowing a group home to operate. State and local governments' enforcement of neutral requirements regarding safety, licensing, and other regulatory requirements governing group homes do not violate the Fair Housing Act so long as the ordinances are enforced in a neutral manner, they do not specifically target group homes, and they do not have an unjustified discriminatory effect on persons with disabilities who wish to reside in group homes. Governments must also consider requests for reasonable accommodations to licensing and regulatory requirements and procedures, and grant them where they may be necessary to afford individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling, as required by the Act. 17. Can a state or local government address suspected criminal activity or fraud and abuse at group homes for persons with disabilities? The Fair Housing Act does not prevent state and local governments from taking nondiscrimmatory action in response to criminal activity, insurance fraud, Medicaid fraud, neglect or abuse of residents, or other illegal conduct occurring at group homes, including reporting complaints to the appropriate state or federal regulatory agency. States and localities must ensure that actions to enforce criminal or other laws are not taken to target group homes and are applied equally, regardless of whether the residents of housing are persons with disabilities. For example, persons with disabilities residing in group homes are entitled to the same constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure as those without disabilities. 13 18. Does the Fair Housing Act permit a state or local government to implement strategies to integrate group homes for persons with disabilities in particular neighborhoods where they are not currently located? Yes. Some strategies a state or local government could use to further the integration of group housing for persons with disabilities, consistent with the Act, include affirmative marketing or offering incentives. For example, jurisdictions may engage in affirmative marketing or offer variances to providers of housing for persons with disabilities to locate future homes in neighborhoods where group homes for persons with disabilities are not currently located. But jurisdictions may not offer incentives for a discriminatory purpose or that have an unjustified discriminatory effect because of a protected characteristic. 19. Can a local government consider the fears or prejudices of neighbors in deciding whether a group home can be located in a particular neighborhood? In the same way a local government would violate the law if it rejected low-income housing in a community because of neighbors' fears that such housing would be occupied by racial minorities (see Q&A 5), a local government violates the law if it blocks a group home or denies a reasonable accommodation request because of neighbors' stereotypical fears or prejudices about persons with disabilities. This is so even if the individual government decision- makers themselves do not have biases against persons with disabilities. Not all community opposition to requests by group homes is necessarily discriminatory. For example, when a group home seeks a reasonable accommodation to operate in an area and the area has limited on-street parking to serve existing residents, it is not a violation of the Fair Housing Act for neighbors and local government officials to raise concerns that the group home may create more demand for on-street parking than would a typical family and to ask the provider to respond. A valid unaddressed concern about inadequate parking facilities could justify denying the requested accommodation, if a similar dwelling that is not a group home or similarly situated use would ordinarily be denied a permit because of such parking concerns. If, however, the group home shows that the home will not create a need for more parking spaces than other dwellings or similarly-situated uses located nearby, or submits a plan to provide any needed off-street parking, then parking concerns would not support a decision to deny the home a permit. 14 Questions and Answers on the Fair Housing Act and Reasonable Accommodation Requests to Local Zoning and Land Use Laws 20. When does a state or local government violate the Fair Housing Act by failing to grant a request for a reasonable accommodation? A state or local government violates the Fair Housing Act by failing to grant a reasonable accommodation request if (1) the persons requesting the accommodation or, in the case of a group home, persons residing in or expected to reside in the group home are persons with a disability under the Act; (2) the state or local government knows or should reasonably be expected to know of their disabilities; (3) an accommodation in the land use or zoning ordinance or other mles, policies, practices, or services of the state or locality was requested by or on behalf of persons with disabilities; (4) the requested accommodation may be necessary to afford one or more persons with a disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the dwelling; (5) the state or local government refused to grant, failed to act on, or unreasonably delayed the accommodation request; and (6) the state or local government cannot show that granting the accommodation would impose an undue financial and administrative burden on the local government or that it would fundamentally alter the local government's zoning scheme. A requested accommodation may be necessary if there is an identifiable relationship between the requested accommodation and the group home residents' disability. Further infonnation is provided in Q&A 10 above and the HUD/DOJ Joint Statement on Reasonable Accommodations under the Fair Housing Act. 21. Can a local government deny a group home's request for a reasonable accommodation without violating the Fair Housing Act? Yes, a local government may deny a group home's request for a reasonable accommodation if the request was not made by or on behalf of persons with disabilities (by, for example, the group home developer or operator) or if there is no disability-related need for the requested accommodation because there is no relationship between the requested accommodation and the disabilities of the residents or proposed residents. In addition, a group home's request for a reasonable accommodation may be demed by a local government if providing the accommodation is not reasonable-in other words, if it would impose an undue financial and administrative burden on the local government or it would fundamentally alter the local government's zoning scheme. The determination of undue financial and administrative burden must be decided on a case-by-case basis involving various factors, such as the nature and extent of the administrative burden and the cost of the requested accommodation to the local govenmient, the fmancial resources of the local government, and the benefits that the accommodation would provide to the persons with disabilities who will reside in the group home. 15 When a local government refuses an accommodation request because it would pose an undue financial and administrative burden, the local government should discuss with the requester whether there is an alternative accommodation that would effectively address the disability-related needs of the group home's residents without imposing an undue financial and administrative burden. This discussion is called an "interactive process." If an alternative accommodation would effectively meet the disability-related needs of the residents of the group home and is reasonable (that is, it would not impose an undue fmancial and administrative burden or fundamentally alter the local government's zoning scheme), the local government must grant the alternative accommodation. An interactive process in which the group home and the local government discuss the disability-related need for the requested accommodation and possible alternative accommodations is both required under the Act and helpful to all concerned, because it often results in an effective accommodation for the group home that does not pose an undue financial and administrative burden or fundamental alteration for the local government. 22. What is the procedure for requesting a reasonable accommodation? The reasonable accommodation must actually be requested by or on behalf of the individuals with disabilities who reside or are expected to reside in the group home. When the request is made, it is not necessary for the specific individuals who would be expected to live in the group home to be identified. The Act does not require that a request be made in a particular manner or at a particular time. The group home does not need to mention the Fair Housing Act or use the words "reasonable accommodation" when making a reasonable accommodation request. The group home must, however, make the request in a manner that a reasonable person would understand to be a disability-related request for an exception, change, or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice, or service. When making a request for an exception, change, or adjustment to a local land use or zoning regulation or policy, the group home should explain what type of accommodation is being requested and, if the need for the accommodation is not readily apparent or known by the local government, explain the relationship between the accommodation and the disabilities of the group home residents. A request for a reasonable accommodation can be made either orally or in writing. It is often helpful for both the group home and the local government if the reasonable accommodation request is made in writing. This will help prevent misunderstandings regarding what is being requested or whether or when the request was made. Where a local land use or zoning code contains specific procedures for seeking a departure from the general mle, courts have decided that these procedures should ordinarily be followed. If no procedure is specified, or if the procedure is unreasonably burdensome or intrusive or involves significant delays, a request for a reasonable accommodation may, 16 nevertheless, be made in some other way, and a local government is obligated to grant it if the requested accommodation meets the criteria discussed in Q&A 20, above. Whether or not the local land use or zoning code contains a specific procedure for requesting a reasonable accommodation or other exception to a zoning regulation, if local government officials have previously made statements or otherwise indicated that an application for a reasonable accommodation would not receive fair consideration, or if the procedure itself is discriminatory, then persons with disabilities living in a group home, and/or its operator, have the right to file a Fair Housing Act complaint in court to request an order for a reasonable accommodation to the local zoning regulations. 23. Does the Fair Housing Act require local governments to adopt formal reasonable accommodation procedures? The Act does not require a local government to adopt formal procedures for processing requests for reasonable accommodations to local land use or zoning codes. DOJ and HUD nevertheless strongly encourage local governments to adopt formal procedures for identifying and processing reasonable accommodation requests and provide training for government officials and staff as to application oftfae procedures. Procedures for reviewing and acting on reasonable accommodation requests will help state and local governments meet their obligations under the Act to respond to reasonable accommodation requests and implement reasonable accommodations promptly. Local governments are also encouraged to ensure that the procedures to request a reasonable accommodation or other exception to local zoning regulations are well known throughout the community by, for example, posting them at a readily accessible location and in a digital format accessible to persons with disabilities on the government's website. Ifajiuisdiction chooses to adopt formal procedures for reasonable accommodation requests, the procedures cannot be onerous or require information beyond what is necessary to show that the individual has a disability and that the requested accommodation is related to that disability. For example, in most cases, an individual's medical record or detailed information about the nature of a person's disability is not necessary for this inquiry. In addition, officials and staff must be aware that any procedures for requesting a reasonable accommodation must also be flexible to accommodate the needs of the individual making a request, including accepting and considering requests that are not made through the official procedure. The adoption of a reasonable accommodation procedure, however, will not cure a zoning ordinance that treats group homes differently than other residential housing with the same number of unrelated persons. 17 24. What if a local government fails to act promptly on a reasonable accommodation request? A local government has an obligation to provide prompt responses to reasonable accommodation requests, whether or not a formal reasonable accommodation procedure exists. A local government's undue delay in responding to a reasonable accommodation request may be deemed a failure to provide a reasonable accommodation. 25. Can a local government enforce its zoning code against a group home that violates the zoning code but has not requested a reasonable accommodation? The Fair Housing Act does not prohibit a local government from enforcing its zoning code against a group home that has violated the local zoning code, as long as that code is not discriminatory or enforced in a discriminatory manner. If, however, the group home requests a reasonable accommodation when faced with enforcement by the locality, the locality still must consider the reasonable accommodation request. A request for a reasonable accommodation may be made at any time, so at that point, the local government must consider whether there is a relationship between the disabilities of the residents of the group home and the need for the requested accommodation. If so, the locality must grant the requested accommodation unless doing so would pose a fundamental alteration to the local government's zoning scheme or an undue financial and administrative burden to the local government. Questions and Answers on Fair Housing Act Enforcement of Complaints Involving Land Use and Zoning 26. How are Fair Housing Act complaints involving state and local land use laws and practices handled by HUD and DOJ? The Act gives HUD the power to receive, investigate, and conciliate complaints of discrimination, including complaints that a state or local government has discriminated in exercising its land use and zoning powers. HUD may not issue a charge of discrimination pertaining to "the legality of any State or local zoning or other land use law or ordinance." Rather, after investigating, HUD refers matters it believes may be meritorious to DOJ, which, in its discretion, may decide to bring suit against the state or locality within 18 months after the practice at issue occurred or terminated. DOJ may also bring suit by exercising its authority to initiate litigation alleging a pattern or practice of discrimination or a denial of rights to a group of persons which raises an issue of general public importance. IfHUD determines that there is no reasonable cause to believe that there may be a violation, it will close an investigation without referring the matter to DOJ. But a HUD or DOJ 18 decision not to proceed with a land use or zoning matter does not foreclose private plaintiffs from pursuing a claim. Litigation can be an expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain process for all parties. HUD and DOJ encourage parties to land use disputes to explore reasonable alternatives to litigation, including alternative dispute resolution procedures, like mediation or conciliation of the HUD complaint. HUD attempts to conciliate all complaints under the Act that it receives, including those involving land use or zoning laws. In addition, it is DO J's policy to offer prospective state or local govermnents the opportunity to engage in pre-suit settlement negotiations, except in the most unusual circumstances. 27. How can I find more information? For more information on reasonable accommodations and reasonable modifications under the Fair Housing Act: . HUD/DOJ Joint Statement on Reasonable Accommodations under the Fair Housing Act, available at h s://www.'ustice. ov/crt/fair-housin - olic -statements-and- uidance-0 or h ://www.hud. ov/offices/flieo/libra /huddo'statement, df. . HUD/DOJ Joint Statement on Reasonable Modifications under the Fair Housing Act, available at }\ s://www."ustice. ov/crt/fair-housin - olic -statements-and- uidance-0 orht ://www.hud. ov/offices/fheo/disabilities/reasonable modifications mar08. df. For more information on state and local governments' obligations under Section 504: . HUD website at h :// ortal.hud. ov/hud ortal/HUD?src=/ ro ram offices/ fair housin e ual o /disabilities/sect504. For more information on state and local governments' obligations under the ADA and Olmstead: . U.S. Department of Justice website, www.ADA. ov, or call the ADA information line at (800) 514-0301 (voice) or (800) 514-0383 (TTY). . Statement of the Department of Justice on Enforcement of the Integration Mandate of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Olmstead v. L.C., available at htt ://www.ada. ov./olmstead/ &a olmstead.htm. . Statement of the Department of Housing and Urban Development on the Role of Housing in Accomplishing the Goals ofOlmstead, available at h :// ortal.hud. ov/hud ortal/documents/huddoc?id=01msteadGuidnc060413. df. 19 For more information on the requirement to affirmatively further fair housing: . Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, 80 Fed. Reg. 42,272 (July 16, 2015) (to be codified at 24 C.F.R. pts. 5, 91, 92, 570,574, 576, and 903). . U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Version 1, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule Guidebook (2015), available at ht s://www.hudexchan e.info/resources/documents/AFFH-Rule-Guidebook. df. . Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Vol. 1, Fair Housing Planning Guide (1996), available at ht ://www.hud. ov/offices/fheo/ima es/fli . df. For more information on nuisance and crime-free ordinances: . Office of General Counsel Guidance on Application of Fair Housing Act Standards to the Enforcement of Local Nuisance and Crime-Free Housing Ordinances Against Victims of Domestic Violence, Other Crime Victims, and Others Who Require Police or Emergency Ser/ices (Sept. 13,2016), available at ht :// ortal.hud. ov/hud ortal/documents/ huddoc?id=FmalNuisanceOrdGdnce. df. 20 SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTIES – COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DETERMINATION PAGE 1 OF 2 __________________________________________________________ FROM: Dan Olson, City Planner ____________________________________________________________________ TO: Planning Commission (for May 13 Meeting) DATE: May 7, 2019 RE: Consider adoption of resolution that the sale of surplus property conforms to the Comprehensive Plan A. BACKGROUND On March 5, 2019, City Council determined that the western portion of Iron Horse Park is surplus land that could be sold to raise funds for park system improvements. This surplus land is proposed as the location for three new single-family homes. The Council determination was prompted by the approval of a plat by the City of New Hope for 32 new homes just west of the Park. On February 6, 2019 the Park and Recreation Commission expressed support for the sale of these properties provided that the remaining park is replatted as park land. According to state statute § 462.356, Subd. 2, for those communities with an adopted Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission shall report to the City Council whether the sale of the properties is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Attachment: A. Resolution B. 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The following are excerpts from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan related to the sale of the surplus properties.  Adopt park plan (page 106): One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to adopt a park master plan. This was adopted by the City Council in 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Sale of Surplus Property SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTIES – COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DETERMINATION PAGE 2 OF 2 Recommended finding: The surplus property sale would achieve the following Comprehensive Plan goal: o Maximize adaptive flexibility so that the parks may change as the needs of the neighborhood and community change (goal #5, page 105)  Housing Policy #3 (page 35): Increase the availability of new housing currently underrepresented in Crystal’s housing stock, such as move-up single-family houses. Recommended finding: Since the majority of Crystal’s single-family homes were constructed prior to the 1970, the addition of new single-family housing created by the sale of these surplus properties adds new housing opportunities within Crystal. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission adopt resolution 2019-02 that the sale of the surplus properties by the city is in conformance to the Comprehensive Plan based on the findings in Section B above. 514713v1 MNI CR150-4 CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - 02 A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED SALE OF CERTAIN LAND BY THE CITY OF CRYSTAL FOR RESIDENTIAL HOUSING PURPOSES IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF CRYSTAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Crystal (“City”) proposes to convey the following real property (the (“Property”) for the purpose of constructing single-family homes: Proposed lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Iron Horse Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota and; WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.356, subd. 2 requires the Planning Commission to review the proposed acquisition or disposal of publicly-owned real property within the City prior to its acquisition or disposal, to determine whether in the opinion of the Planning Commission, such acquisition or disposal is consistent with the comprehensive municipal plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed conveyance of the Property, and has determined that such conveyance would maximize adaptive flexibility of the park system as the needs of the neighborhood and community change, and also to provide new housing opportunities within Crystal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Crystal that the proposed conveyance of the Property is consistent with the City’s comprehensive municipal plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be communicated to the City Council. Adopted this 13th day of May, 2019, by the Planning Commission of the City of Crystal. Chair, Crystal Planning Commission Attachment A TOWN CENTER AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE PAGE 1 OF 6 _______________________________________________________________ FROM: Dan Olson, City Planner ____________________________________________________________________ TO: Planning Commission (for May 13 Meeting) DATE: May 7, 2019 RE: Discuss Town Center district amendments to the Unified Development Code A. BACKGROUND Staff is proposing amendments to the city’s Unified Development Code (UDC) relating to the creation of two new zoning districts. The amendments are to fulfill land redevelopment goals of the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The two new districts are Town Center (TC), which is a base zoning district, and Town Center – Planned Development (TC-PD), which is an overlay district. The Planning Commission is being asked to provide input on the proposed ordinance regulations before the public hearing process begins. Attachments: A. Planned land use map – 2040 Comprehensive Plan B. Proposed amendments to official zoning map C. Proposed Town Center district amendments B. PROPOSED UDC AMENDMENTS Proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The comprehensive plan identifies four redevelopment areas in Crystal (see attachment A):  Area A: The area surrounding Becker Park and the proposed LRT station  Area B: A narrow parcel of land near 51st and Douglas Drive  Area C: The area along 42nd Avenue from city hall to the Robbinsdale border  Area D: The area along Douglas Drive from 32nd to 36th Avenues The proposed Town Center district amendments are for area A, which was described in the plan as a future mixed use redevelopment area. The most recent 2040 plan PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Town Center District Amendments TOWN CENTER AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE PAGE 2 OF 6 reviewed by the Commission on December 10, 2018 did not show area A as “mixed use” on the 2040 planned land use map. Instead the map showed this area with various land use designations that reflected the use of each property. After the plan was submitted to the Metropolitan Council in December 2018, they requested the city identify area A as a mixed use area to reflect the city’s future intentions. Staff supports this change and will include it in the final 2040 Plan for City Council approval. Two additional zoning districts could be created in the future for areas C and D that are patterned after the Town Center district. The comprehensive plan provides guidance for any redevelopment in area B. Notable features of Town Center districts. The following are notable features of the proposed Town Center districts. 1. Two districts. The amendment creates a new base zoning district called Town Center and an overlay district called Town Center – Planned Development (attachment B).  Town Center base district (TC). Regulations for a base district are mandatory for those properties located in the district, except that property owners who wish to rebuild an existing use in its current configuration may do so under the UDC’s nonconforming use provisions (section 515.29 of the UDC).  Town Center – Planned Development (TC-PD). o The boundaries of the TC-PD district are shown in attachment B and on the next page. o Property owners who wish to rebuild an existing use in its current configuration may do so under the UDC’s nonconforming use provisions. o Property owners within the boundary have the option to rezone a property to TC-PD. If they choose not to rezone the property, the zoning district classification shown on the zoning map determines the required base district regulations. o The regulations for the TC-PD district are located within the Planned Development (PD) section of the UDC, which allows for flexibility from base district requirements. However the TC-PD district has specific zoning requirements the property owner must meet. On the next page is a district map and flow chart that explains how redevelop occurs in both districts. TOWN CENTER AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE PAGE 3 OF 6 TOWN CENTER AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE PAGE 4 OF 6 2. Building placement and form: The new districts emphasize the building’s placement on the lot. The following are noteworthy requirements:  Setbacks. The building would be set back at least 1’ but no more than 10’ from the front property line. Currently front setbacks in other business districts are 30’, however staff proposes that the front setback in the Commercial (C) and Industrial (I) districts be changed to a minimum of 10’. With this change there would be less of a dramatic difference in building locations between the TC and C/I districts.  Façade. On the primary façade: o At least 50% of the façade would be required to have windows, while any upper floors would have at least 30% windows. o At least 30% of the windows are to remain free of signage. o The building shall occupy at least 75% of the length along the property line.  Building height. The height limits would be the same as the Commercial and Industrial districts: 5 stories or 60’, whichever is less. For those areas in either district near single or two family dwellings, a shadow study and mitigation would be required to reduce negative impacts to dwellings.  Encroachments. Certain building elements, such as awnings, would be allowed to encroach into the required setback. 3. Land Uses:  TC district. The main objective in allowing specific land uses is to create a vibrant street scene. This is especially important considering that the TC district is relatively small in size. To create that street scene, uses would be limited to retail, restaurants, and offices. Multi-family residential uses would also be allowed to mix within the same building or on the same property.  TC-PD district. In addition to those uses allowed in the TC district, several additional principal uses would be allowed in the TC-PD district, including: o Adult day care facilities o Attached one-family dwellings (townhouses and row houses) o Hotels and motels o Indoor industrial uses o Private indoor recreational uses o Public buildings o Religious institutions o Schools 4. New street connections: Within the city’s main commercial area, there are opportunities to create better street connections if the properties are redeveloped. The approximate alignments of new public street connections are shown as highlighted on the next page, with affected properties outlined in red. TOWN CENTER AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE PAGE 5 OF 6 Upon redevelopment of one of these properties, the developer would be required to construct the respective street connections. The specific alignment, design and other details would be determined at that time. 5. Parking:  TC district. For non-residential development in the TC district, staff proposes that no off-street parking would be required. If a developer proposes to build a parking lot, the lot would be located to the rear or side of the building. For residential development, one off-street space per unit, plus one visitor space per 5 units is required.  TC-PD district. Within the TC-PD district: o The developer shall provide the required parking listed in the parking section of the UDC. o The developer may provide a parking study for approval during the rezoning application process that reduces the required number of parking spaces. o Any surface parking lot would be located to the rear or side of the building. TOWN CENTER AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE PAGE 6 OF 6 C. REQUESTED ACTION The Planning Commission is being asked to provide comments on the proposed Town Center amendments to the UDC. The proposed schedule for adopting a new ordinance is as follows: July 11 Council discusses proposed ordinance, including Planning Commission comments. The Planning Commission is invited to this Council Work Session August 12 Planning Commission public hearing August 20 Council first reading of ordinance September 3 Council second reading of ordinance October 12 Effective date of ordinance Area A Area B Area C Area D Glen Haven Memorial GardensCemetery Adath Chesed Shel Emes Cemetery RivertreeSchool 43rd Ave N 45th Pl N 46th Ave N 34thAveN 36th Ave N SumterAv eNHampshire Ave NWinnetka Ave N32nd Ave N Adair Ave N38th Ave N BN SF R ailroad Orchard Ave N60th Ave N Douglas Dr NDouglas Dr N54th Ave N County Road81 48thAveN 51st Ave N WilshireBlvd Vera Cruz Ave NCP Railroad 42nd Ave N ScottAveNHampshire Ave NCo unty Road 81 West Broadway 56th Ave N 54th Ave N 56thAveN Fairview Ave N 44th Ave N 49th Ave N BrunswickAveN52nd Ave N AngelineAve N Hampshire Ave NOrchard Ave NKentucky Ave NVera Cruz Ave NBrunswick Ave N56th Ave N 58th Ave N Quail AveNJersey Ave NLouisiana Ave NYukon Ave N Edgewood Ave NCorvallis Ave N Georgia Ave NJersey Ave NVera Cruz Ave NWelcome Ave NKentucky Ave N58th Ave N 59thAveN Louisiana Ave NQuail Ave N32nd Pl N 45th Ave NIdaho Ave N33rd Ave N 30th Ave N LakesideAveN 57th Ave NQuebecAveN 35th Ave N 58th Ave N Vera Cruz Ave N44th Ave N 59th Ave N Kentucky Ave NWelcome Ave N57th Ave N 53rd Ave N 52ndAveN Zane Ave NPerr yAve NToledo Ave NHampshire Ave NGeorgia Ave NFlorida Ave N47th Ave N 41st Ave N Idaho Ave NEdgewood Ave NZane Ave NLombardy Ln Utah Ave N56th Ave N AdairAveN37th Ave N Brunswick Ave N45th Ave N Bernard Ave N Wilshire Blvd Utah Ave NFlorida Ave NGeorgiaAveNQuail Ave N54th Ave N Welcome Ave NVera Cruz Ave NXenia Ave N35th Ave N ColoradoAveNRhode Island Ave NQuail Ave NJersey Ave N33rdPlN Fairview Ave N Markwood Dr N 48th Ave N Regent Ave NLakela nd Ave N29th Ave N M edi cine La keR d Northern DrXylon Ave N30thAveN Toledo Ave N33rd Ave N Lombardy Ln Wisconsin AveNWisconsin Ave NGeorgia Ave N40th Ave N 56th Pl N 57th Ave N Welcome Ave N49th Ave N 45th Pl N 48th Ave N 57th Ave N FairviewAveNFairview Ave N 39th Ave N 38th Ave N 35th Ave N 58th Ave N 31st Ave N Corvallis Ave N 43rd Ave N 36th Ave N 41stAveN Nevada Ave NJersey Ave NFloridaAveNLouisiana Ave NJersey Ave NFlorida Ave NJersey Ave NCP RailroadDouglas Dr NOregon Ave NFlorida Ave N29th AveN Vera Cruz Ave NColoradoAveN 58th Ave N CrystalAirportRd Maryland Ave N55thAveNElmhurst Ave N Aquila Ave NEdgewood Ave NIdaho Ave NFlorida Ave NL akeland Ave NZane Ave NYates Ave NZane Ave NXenia Ave NRhodeIslandAveN Edgewood Ave NYates Ave N50th Ave N Highway 100Colorado Ave NYates Ave NXenia Ave NBrunswick Ave NJersey Ave N31st Ave N Perry Ave NKentuckyAveNGeorgia Ave NEdgewood Ave NFlorida Ave NPerry Ave NJersey Ave NIdaho Ave NMaryland Ave N49th Ave NOregonCtNCrystal Airport RdDudley Ave N ValeCrestRdEdgewood Ave N29th Ave N Corvallis Ave N June Ave N29thPlN 51st Pl N Valley Pl N Xenia Ave N50th Ave N 35th Pl N 46th Pl N Quail Ave NRegent Ave NAngelineAveN Hill Pl N Orchard Ave NPerry Ave NMaryland Ave NNoble Ave NKyle Ave NMajor Ave NLee Ave NMaryland Ave NKentucky Ave N62nd Ave N 61st Ave N Kentucky Ave NGeorgia Ave NIdaho Ave NIdaho Ave NNevada Ave NGeorgia Ave NGeorgia Ave NYates Ave NEdgewood Ave NPennsylvania Ave NToledo Ave NOrchard Ave NCP Railroad Unity Ave NLakeland A ve NLakesideAveNSherburneAveNWelcomeAveN58th Pl N 31stAveN 60th Ave N Cloverdale Ave N Byron Ave N 53rd Ave N 34thAveN 39th Ave N 48th Ave N B rook ridge AveN30thAveN TwinLakeTer29thPl N 51st Pl N Adair Ave NDouglas Dr NVirginiaAveNKentucky Ave NCloverdale Ave N 62nd Ave N Lakeland Ave NMaryland Ave NLouisiana Ave NBrentwood Ave NPennsylvania Ave NWelcome Ave NPennsylvania Ave N59th Pl N 46th Pl N Kentucky Ave N34th Pl NHighway100 XeniaAveNWelcomeAveNVeraCr uzAveNYatesAveNYates Ave NNevada Ave NHanson Ct N Scott Ave NNorth Lions Skyway MacPark/WildlifeArea Broadway NorthBass Lake Becker TwinOak Iron Horse Lions SooLine Cavanagh ForestElementary CommunityCenter Welcome MemoryLane Brownwood Kentucky Florida Crystal Highlands Yunkers Valley Place Lee Sunnyview Bassett Creek Hagemeister Pond FAIR Neill Twin Lake St Raphael BeaconAcademy ± 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.1 Miles c:dave\ArcGIS Projuects\Landuse 2040.mxd Crystal Airport * If redeveloped for other uses, then the property is guided "Low Density Residential". Scale 1:25,000 Map Legend Zoning Planned Land Use: Low Density Residential (LDR) Med. Density Residential (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) Commercial Mixed Use Industrial Park or Other Public Open Space* Institutional* Rail Corridor Crystal Airport Right-Of-Way Water Attachment A COLORADO AVEBRUNSWICK AVEADAIR AVE XENIA AVE 41ST AVE43RD AVE44TH AVEYATES AVE NZANE AVEADAIR AVECOLORADO AVEBRUNSWICK AVEWELCOME AVECOLORADO AVE BRUNSWICK AVE ADAIR AVE ZANE AVE YATES AVE XENIA AVE WELCOME AVE 38TH AVE39TH AVEADAIR AVEDOUGLAS DRDOUGLAS DRDOUGLAS DRDOUGLAS DR45TH AVE44TH AVE43RD AVE42ND AVEEDGEWOOD AVE NFLORIDA AVE GEORGIA AVE HAMPSHIRE AVE KENTUCKY AVE N IDAHO AVE41ST PL NMEMORY LANE 43RD AVE NKENT UCKY CIR N KENTUCKY(ROCKFORD RD)LOUISIANA AVE WINNETKA AVEKENTUCKY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVEJERSEY AVEIDAHOAVENIDAHO CIRGEORGIA AVEFLORIDA AVEEDGEWOOD AVE40TH AVE39TH AVE39TH AVE38TH AVEJERSEY CIR NMARKWOODIDAHO AVE N37TH AVEMARKWOOD DRGEORGIAHAMPSHIRE AVE N FLORIDA GEORGIA AVE NHAMPSHIRE AVE NKENTUCKY AVE35TH AVE34THAVEN34THPLN33RDDANPL33RD AVE32NDPLN32ND PLVIRGINIAUTAH AVE30THAVEYUKON AVE32ND AVENORTHERN DR31ST AVEAVENVIRGINIAAVENPLVALLEY34TH AVEHILL PL35TH AVE35TH PL36TH AVEJERSEY AVEIDAHO AVEHAMPSHIRE AVEGEORGIA AVEFLORIDA AVE EDGEWOOD AVE FLORIDA AVEGEORGIA AVEJERSEY AVE N33RD AVEVALLEY PL35TH AVEMARYLAND AVE NLOUISIANA AVENEVADA AVENEVADA AVELOUISIANA AVEQUEBEC AVE NWINNETKA AVE N30THAVE30TH AVE NSUMTER AVE32ND AVE31ST AVELOUISIANA AVE32ND AVEWINNETKA AVE31STKENTUCKY AVEKENTUCKY AVEJERSEY AVEJERSEY AVE29TH AVEIDAHONHAMPSHIRE AVEGEORGIA AVE30TH AVE29TH AVEEDGEWOOD AVEAVEEDGEWOOD AVE N31ST AVE32ND AVEIDAHO AVEFLORIDA AVE27TH AVEAVEHAMPSHIRE AVEGEORGIA AVEDOUGLAS DRDOUGLAS DRDOUGLAS DR34TH AVEZANE AVE36TH AVEXENIA AVEWELCOME AVEYATESBRUNSWICK AVEZANE AVEADAIR AVEYATES AVE XENIA AVEWELCOME AVEAVE35THADAIR AVEBRUNSWICK AVE32ND AVEBRUNSWICK AVE32ND AVEWELCOME AVEPLNBRUNSWICKAVE29THPLNMEDICINE LAKE RD29THLAMPLIGHTERLA NZANE AVE29TH AVEVALECREST RDBROOKRIDGEAVE27TH AVE NDOUGLAS DRREGENT AVEQUAIL AVEPERRY AVEORCHARD AVE59TH AVE60TH AVE60TH AVELAKELAND AVE NWELCOME AVEXENIA AVEZANE PL(BASS LAKE RD)BRUNSWICK AVEADAIR AVEZANE AVEYATES AVE57TH AVECLOVERDALE AVE NCOLORADO AVE N58TH AVEXENIAWELCOMEVERA CRUZ AVEUNITY AVETOLEDO AVESCOTT AVE N54TH AVEWILSHIRE BLVDORCHARD AVEPERRY AVEQUAIL REGENT AVETOLEDO AVE UNITY AVE56THAVEPERRY AVE56TH PLQUAIL AVE58TH AVE57TH AVETWINLAKE TERTWIN LAKE TER57TH AVE N56TH AVE NWILSHIRE BLVDREGENT AVEORCHARD AVEDOUGLAS DR DOUGLAS DRQUAIL AVE PERRY DUDLEY AVE59TH AVEKENTUCKY AVE IDAHO AVE ELMHURST AVE 60TH AVE60TH AVELOMBARDY LANELOMBARDY LA61ST AVE N61ST AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE 62ND AVE NKENTUCKY AVE FLORIDA AVE NLAKELAND AVE N JERSEY AVEHAMPSHIRE AVELAKELAND AVE WEST BROADWAY 58TH PLQUEBEC RHODE ISLAND AVE NAVE59TH AVE59TH PLPENNSYLVANIA AVE OREGON AVE NEVADA AVE SHIRLEY PL59THMARYLAND AVE 60TH AVE NWEST BROADWAY BASS LAKE RDSUMTER AVE RHODE ISLAND AVE PENNSYLVANIA AVE NEVADA AVE 58TH AVE54T H AV E N NEVADA AVE 56TH AVEJERSEY AVE N 57TH AVEKENTUCKY AVE58TH AVECLOVERDALE AVECLOVERDALE AVE57TH AVEBRENTWOOD AVEELMHURST AVE WEST BROADWAY 55THAVEHAMPSHIRE AVE HAMPSHIRE AVESHERBURNEAVENBASS LAKE RD35TH AVE N34TH AVE N35TH AVE 36TH AVE 35TH AVE 34TH PL 54TH AVE54TH AVE53RD AVE52ND AVEKENTUCKY AVEJERSEY AVEIDAHO AVEHAMPSHIRE AVEGEORGIA AVEFLORIDA AVEEDGEWOOD AVEWEST BROADWAY 51ST PLCORVALLIS AVE50TH AVE51ST PL NEDGEWOODAVESOO LINE PLOREGON AVEMARYLAND AVE53RD AVE52ND AVELOUISIANA AVELOUISIANA AVE NMARYLAND AVE 46TH AVE47TH AVE 48TH AVE49TH AVEEDGEWOOD AVE FLORIDA AVE GEORGIA AVE HAMPSHIRE AVE IDAHO AVE FAIRVIEW AVEJERSEY AVE KENTUCKY AVE 48TH AVE47TH AVEHAMPSHIRE AVE 46THPL46TH AVE45TH PLN45TH PLFLORIDA AVE JERSEYAVEVERA CRUZ AVE54TH AVEDOUGLAS DRDOUGLAS DRFAIRVIEW AVE50TH AVECORVALLIS AVE51ST AVEBERNARD AVESCOTT 53RD AVE54TH AVESCOTT AVEQUAIL AVE 53RD AVE52ND AVEREGENTPERRY CRQUAIL AVELAKELAND AVEANGELINEANGELINEAVE NUNITY CT NANGELINECT51ST PLHANSON CTHANS ON CT HANSON CTLAKELAND AVE CORVALLIS AVEWELCOME AVE XENIAAVE NWELCOME AVELAKELAND AVEVERA CRUZ AVEVERA CRUZ AVE NVERA CRUZ AVE NWELCOME AVE45TH AVECOLORADO AVEXENIA AVEWELCOME AVEXENIA48TH AVE47TH AVEYATESAVE ZANE AVEZANE AVEADAIR AVE46TH AVEBRUNSWICK AVE COLORADOFAIRVIEW AVEAVEN45TH AVE47TH AVE BYRON AVE48TH AVELAKESIDE AVE49TH AVELAKESIDE AVE48THAVEREGENTAVEQUAILAVEPERRYAVEQUAIL AVE NTOLEDO AVE NORCHARD AVE NLAKELAND AVE LAKELAND AVE AQUILA AVE N YUKON AVE N XYLON AVE N WISCONSINUTAH AVE UTAH AVE 33REVAQUILA AVEWISCONSIN AVEVIRGINIA 32ND AVEWINNETKA AVEWINNETKA AVEWINPARK DR PENNSYLVANIA AVE(ROCKFORD RD)REGENT AVE QUAIL AVE PERRY AVE N ORCHARD AVE N MAJOR AVE LEE AVE AVE KYLE JUNE AVE NOBLE AVE LOUISIANA AVE N47TH AVE N47TH AVE VERA CRUZ AVELOUISIANA AVE LOUISIANA AVE36TH AVEST RAPHAEL DRMARYLAND AVE LOUISIANA AVE MARYLAND AVE ADAIRLAKELAND56TH AVEYATES AVE NWILSHIRE BLVD.NEVADA AVE NEVADA AVE 45TH AVELOUISIANA AVEMARYLAND AVEADAIR AVE NADAIR CT NTOLEDO AVE OREGON CT BeaconAcademyBASSETT CREEKMAC NATURE AREAVALLEY PLACEBECKERFAIRSKYWAYNORTH LIONSFOREST ELEMENTARYCRYSTAL COMMTY CNTRMEMORY LANECAVANAGHTWIN OAKHAGEMEISTER PONDYUNKERBROWNWOODBROADWAYIRON HORSESUNNYVIEWWELCOMEKENTUCKYFLORIDAMACTWIN LAKELEELIONS SOO LINECRYSTAL HIGHLANDSNORTH BASS LAKEProposed Zoning Map®0.25 0 0.25 0.50.125MilesBASE ZONING DISTRICTS:R-1 - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALR-2 - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALR-3 - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALC - COMMERCIALTC - TOWN CENTERI - INDUSTRIALAP - AIRPORT DISTRICTAdath ChesedShel EmesCemeteryGlen HavenMemorial GardensCemeteryCity of Crystal Community Development Department4141 Douglas Drive North, Crystal, MN 55422-1696763-531-1142, www.crystalmn.govCrystal AirportDisclaimer:The Official Zoning Map is subject to change by action of the Crystal City Council. Any disagreement(s) or inconsistencies between this map and an ordinance adoptedby the city council, the ordinance shall prevail.Official Zoning District Map, Crystal, MinnesotaWe the undersigned certify that this is the Official Zoning Map,adopted by Crystal City Council on MONTH DAY YEAR_____________ _____________________Date Jim Adams, Mayor_____________ _____________________ Date Chrissy Serres, City ClerkDate: 3/27/2019Overlay Districts: Planned Development (PD)Town Center Planned Development (TC-PD)Floodplain Overlay DistrictCity Park LandWater BodiesAttachment B 1 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 CHAPTER V UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) Section 500 General provisions 500.01 Title and authority 500.03 Purpose 500.05 Relationship to comprehensive plan 500.07 Relationship to existing ordinances 500.09 Transitional rules 500.11 Severability Section 505 Definitions Section 510 Administration 510.01 Applicability 510.03 Planning commission 510.05 Board of appeals and adjustments 510.07 Zoning administrator 510.09 General development review requirements 510.11 Summary of application and review procedure types 510.13 Specific development review procedure requirements 510.15 Zoning certificate 510.17 Site plan review 510.19 Conditional use permit 510.21 Adjacent parcel land conveyance 510.23 Lot consolidation 510.25 Subdivisions 510.27 Comprehensive plan amendment 510.29 Rezoning or text amendments 510.31 Rezoning to planned development overlay district (PD) 510.33 Variance 510.35 Appeals 510.37 Enforcement and penalties Section 515 Zoning districts and use regulations 515.01 Official zoning map 515.03 Establishment of zoning districts 515.05 Base zoning districts 515.07 Overlay zoning districts 515.09 Floodplain overlay district (FP) 515.11 Shoreland overlay district 515.13 Planned development overlay district (PD) 515.15 Transit oriented development overlay district Reserved Attachment C 7 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Subd. 11. Application. “Application” means the process by which the owner, or their agent, of a parcel of land within the city submits a written request for any type of development or sign approval. Subd. 12. Awning. “Awning” means a roof-like cover, often of fabric, plastic, metal, or glass designed and intended for protection from the weather or as a decorative embellishment, and which projects from a wall or roof of a structure primarily over a window, walk, or the like. Any part of an awning which also projects over a door shall be counted as an awning. Subd. 13. Banks or financial institutions. “Banks or financial institutions” means establishments engaged in deposit banking, which may include, but are not limited to, commercial banks, loan or mortgage companies, stockbrokers, or credit unions. Subd. 14. Banquet halls or event centers. “Banquet halls or event centers” means a facility or building available for lease by private parties that may include kitchen facilities for the preparation or catering of food or the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption during scheduled events which are not open to the public. The facility space may be used by various groups for social gatherings, meetings, parties, weddings, receptions, or dances. Subd. 15. Base flood elevation. “Base flood elevation” means the elevation of the “regional flood.” The term “base flood elevation” is used in the flood insurance survey. Subd. 16. Basement. “Basement” means an area of a building, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base subgrade below ground level, regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. Subd. 17. Bed and breakfast establishment. “Bed and breakfast establishment” means an owner-occupied dwelling that offers short-term lodging, with or without meals, for compensation. Subd. 18. Block. “Block” means an area of land within a subdivision that is entirely bounded by streets, railroads, waterways, other natural barriers, the exterior boundary of the subdivision or any combination of the preceding. Subd. 19. Brewer taproom, brewpub or microdistillery. “Brewer taproom, brewpub or microdistillery” has the meaning given it in the Crystal city code, chapter 12. Subd. 20. Building. “Building means any roofed structure used or intended for supporting or sheltering any use or occupancy. An accessory building shall be considered an integral part of the principal building if it is connected to the principal building by a covered passageway. Subd. __.Building façade, primary. “Building façade, primary” means the building façade facing a street. In the case of corner buildings, the primary façade fronts the highest classification of streets, but if the classification is the same for both streets, the city has the authority to designate the primary façade. Subd. ___. Building façade, secondary. “Building façade, secondary” means the building façade on a corner lot that is not designated as the primary building façade. Subd. 21. Building height. “Building height” means the vertical distance of a building measured in feet from average grade around the perimeter of a structure to (see Figure 1): 8 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (a) The deck line of a mansard roof; or (b) The highest point of a flat roof; or (c) The mean height between the eaves and highest point on gable, hip, or gambrel roofs. Figure 1: Illustration of building height Subd. 22. Building, accessory. “Building, accessory” see definition for “Accessory structure” Subd. 23. Building, principal. “Building, principal” means a building that is the primary use of the lot. Subd. 24. Building materials sales. “Building materials sales” means lots and related structures used for the sale of construction materials, lumber, and related materials that may or may not be within an enclosed structure. Subd. ___Building street frontage. “Building street frontage” means the proportion of a lot frontage on a street that is occupied by a building as measured at the required minimum front or corner side yard setback. Subd. 25. Bulk storage of liquids. “Bulk storage of liquids” means a use associated with the bulk storage of oil, gasoline, liquid fertilizer, chemicals, or similar liquids. Subd. 26. Canopy. “Canopy” means a roof-like cover, often made of fabric, plastic, metal, or glass on a support, which is affixed to a building and provides shelter over a doorway. Subd. 27. Carport. “Carport” means an accessory structure used generally for covering vehicles which is open on at least two sides. It may be attached to the home or be freestanding. If the structure is not open on at least two sides, it is considered a garage and shall comply with all requirements in this UDC for garages. 46 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (b) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the policy foundation of the comprehensive plan; and (c) Whether the proposed amendment will be compatible with the adjacent land uses of the property in question. 510.29. Rezoning or text amendments. Subd. 1. Applicability. This subsection outlines the procedural requirements for the amendment of the text of this UDC or the official zoning map. A rezoning request to rezone to the planned development overlay district shall be submitted and processed as provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 510.31. An amendment to the text of this UDC or the official zoning map may be initiated by the planning commission, the city council, proposed by city staff, or initiated by the property owner or authorized agent of property for which the amendment is sought by submitting an application, in writing, to the zoning administrator. Subd. 2. Approval procedure. Amendments to the text of this UDC or official zoning map shall be subject to the Type 2 review procedure. In the case of a rezoning to the PD overlay district as provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 510.31, the applicant shall also submit a site plan for the proposed project. Subd. 3. Approval criteria. The planning commission and city council shall review the necessary submittal requirements, facts, and circumstances of the proposed amendment and make a recommendation and decision on the application based on, but not limited to, consideration of the following criteria: (a) The specific policies and recommendations of the comprehensive plan and other city plans; (b) The purpose and intent of this UDC, or in the case of a map amendment, whether it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district; and (c) If applicable, the adequacy of a buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. 510.31. Rezoning to planned development overlay district (PD). Subd. 1. Approval. Approval of a rezoning to PD and approval of a site plan that is in conformance with the Crystal city code, subsection 515.13 is subject to the approval procedures of this subsection. Approval of a rezoning to PD is also subject to the relevant requirements in the Crystal city code section 510.29. (a) A request to rezone a property to Town Center Planned Development (TC-PD) shall only be allowed for those properties identified on the official zoning map as located within the TC-PD overlay district. When a property has been rezoned to TC-PD, there shall be no underlying zoning district classification. Subd. 2. Effect of city council decision. 49 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Section 515 Zoning Districts and Use Regulation 515.01. Official zoning map. The official zoning map together with all materials attached thereto is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this section. The official zoning map shall be on file with the city clerk. 515.03. Establishment of zoning districts. (a) Established. The zoning classifications and zoning districts specified in Table 2 are hereby established within the city to carry out the purposes of this UDC. Table 2: Zoning Districts Abbreviation District Name BASE ZONING DISTRICTS R1 Low Density Residential District R2 Medium Density Residential District R3 High Density Residential District C Commercial District TC Town Center Core District I Industrial District AP Airport District OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS FP Floodplain Overlay District SL Shoreland Overlay District PD Planned Development Overlay District TD Transit-Oriented Development Overlay District (b) Relationship of overlay districts to base districts. (1) Where land is classified into an overlay zoning district, the regulations governing development in the overlay district shall apply in addition to the regulations governing the underlying base district, unless otherwise noted. In the event of a conflict between the standards of the overlay district and the base district, the standards governing the overlay district shall control. (2) In some instances land may be classified into multiple overlay districts. In the event of a conflict between the standards of the multiple overlay districts, the most restrictive standards shall apply. (c) Zoning district boundaries. 51 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (b) Site development standards. Such standards shall be those provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.03 for the site development standards that apply to the R2 district. (c) Other development standards. In addition to the standards established for the R2 district in this section, all development shall be subject to all other applicable standards as provided in the Crystal city code, section 520. Subd. 3. R-3 High density residential district. (a) Purpose. The purpose of the R-3 High density residential district is to provide for multiple family buildings and directly related, complimentary uses, together with limited commercial uses as provided herein. In accordance with the comprehensive plan, densities are to be no less than 16 and no more than 40 dwellings per gross acre. As part of the approval process for a particular development, the city council may set the maximum density at a specific figure within the range established by the comprehensive plan, depending on the character of the surrounding area and the potential for negative impacts on the community. (b) Site development standards. Such standards shall be those provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.03 for the site development standards that apply to the R3 district. (c) Other development standards. In addition to the standards established for the R3 district in this section, all development shall be subject to all other applicable standards as provided in the Crystal city code, section 520. Subd. 4. C Commercial district. (a) Purpose. The purpose of the C-Commercial district is to provide for commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community. Motor vehicle-oriented uses shall be limited to certain designated corridors. Regulations shall protect those residential uses near commercial uses from negative impacts. (b) Site development standards. Such standards shall be those provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.03 for the site development standards that apply to the Commercial district. (c) Other development standards. In addition to the standards established for the Commercial district in this section, all development shall be subject to all other applicable standards as provided in the Crystal city code, section 520. Subd. 5. Town Center Core District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the TC – Town Center Core district is to accommodate walkable, mixed-use development enhancing the public realm such as parks and streets. Shops mix with multi-family and employment, buildings frame the street and face Becker Park, and local multi-modal streets balance the needs of all users. In accordance with the comprehensive plan, residential densities are to be no less than 25, and no more than 50, dwelling units per gross acre. 52 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (b) Applicability. Existing nonconformities may continue or redevelop as allowed by the Crystal city code, section 515.29. Notwithstanding those regulations, it is the city’s desire that redevelopment of properties within the TC district adhere to the planned land use designations of the comprehensive plan and to the requirements of this subsection. (c) Uses. Principal permitted uses are shown in Table 3 of the Crystal city code, section 515.17. Multiple principal uses within a single parcel or building are permitted in the TC district. (d) Site development standards. In addition to the following standards established for the TC district, all development shall be subject to applicable standards as provided in Crystal city code, section 520. The TC district also includes specific standards for building placement, height, and facades in order to encourage development that enhances walkability, frames the public realm, and seamlessly transitions to adjacent development. (1) Building placement. Principal buildings shall meet the building setback requirements found in Table 7. The purpose of these requirements is to create buildings that have the dominant lines of their facades parallel the line of the street and create a well-defined street edge. (a) At intersections, buildings shall have street facades at or near the sidewalk at the corner (see Figure _____) Figure _____: Illustration of a building that meets both corners at a street intersection (b) Building street frontage. At least 75 percent of the building street frontage shall be occupied by the principal building on a primary building façade or at least 50% for a secondary building façade (see Figure _______). The following are exceptions to these requirements: (i) The city may consider reductions of up to 5 percent to this requirement based on the unique characteristics of the site, if the applicant can 53 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that the building and site design fulfills the purpose of the TC district. (ii) If a building fronts on more than three streets, there is no building street frontage requirement for those property frontages not defined as primary or secondary facades. Figure ______: Illustration of required building street frontages (2) Building height. Maximum building height requirements are shown in Crystal city code, subsection 520.03. The following are additional height requirements: (a) Story height. Stories above the ground floor are limited to 12 feet in height. Stories are measured from finished floor to finished ceiling. (b) Ground floor height. Ground floor height shall be no less than 12 feet in height, but not more than 20 feet. Ground floor height above 20 feet counts as an additional story. (c) Shadow effects study. If a proposed building is located within 75 feet of a one or two-family dwelling, the applicant shall submit a shadow effect study to determine any negative shadow impacts to those dwellings. If negative impacts are determined, the city may require design techniques to mitigate the impacts, such as reducing the height of the building, relocating or reorienting the building within the site, reducing building mass, or stepping-back a portion of the building. (3) Building facades. Building facades shall meet the following requirements: (a) Building articulation. Buildings exceeding 50 feet in width along a street shall incorporate articulation in street-facing facades to break down the scale of large buildings and create visual interest. Techniques to incorporate articulation include stepping back or extending forward a portion of the façade, using different textures or contrasting but compatible materials, dividing the building into 54 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 storefronts with separate display windows and entrances, use of awnings or similar ornamental features, or varying the roofline to reinforce the articulation of the primary façade (see Figure _____). Figure ___: Illustration of techniques used to break down the scale of large buildings (b) Facades facing Becker Park. For those buildings having facades facing Becker Park, the façade facing the park shall be of similar or compatible quality, design and materials as the primary building façade. (c) Façade glazing. Façade glazing for buildings at the street frontages shall meet the following minimum requirements: i. Minimum area requirements. The first floor shall have a minimum glazing of 50 percent and upper floors shall have a minimum glazing of 30 percent. ii. Tinted and reflective glass are prohibited. iii. At least 30 percent of the façade glazing area shall remain free of signage or other opaque materials. (d) Balconies, except those recessed or flush as illustrated in Figure _______, satellite dishes, and heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) are not permitted on the primary building façade. 55 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Figure ___: Illustration showing recessed or flush balconies (e) Building entries. (i) Primary building entry. A functioning primary building entry shall be provided on the primary building façade. This entry shall be clearly defined by means of a canopy, portico, recess, or similar architectural elements (see Figure _____). Figure ___: Illustration of clearly defined building entries (ii) Secondary building entry. A functioning secondary building entry shall be provided on the primary building façade for buildings exceeding 60 feet in width. (4) New street locations. To create better connected streets when redevelopment occurs in the TC district, new streets shall be constructed in the locations shown in Figure ______. The city will consider alternate street locations that achieve this intent. 56 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Figure ______: Location of new street connections in TC district Subd. 56. I Industrial District. (a) Purpose. The purpose of the I-Industrial district is to provide for industrial development such as warehousing and manufacturing, with office and retail allowed as limited accessory uses. (b) Site development standards. Such standards shall be those provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.03 for the site development standards that apply to the Industrial district. (c) Other development standards. In addition to the standards established for the Industrial district in this section, all development shall be subject to all other applicable standards as provided in the Crystal city code, section 520. Subd. 67. AP Airport district. (a) Purpose. The purpose of the AP airport district is to accommodate the continued operation of the Crystal Airport in accordance with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Additions to existing buildings and construction of new buildings on airport property shall be permitted so long as they comply with the standards established in this UDC. (b) Site development standards. Those standards as provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.03 shall constitute as the site development standards that apply to the AP district. 57 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (c) Other development standards. In addition to the standards established for the AP District in this section, all development shall be subject to all other applicable standards as provided in the Crystal city code, section 520. 515.07. Overlay zoning districts. The overlay districts are as provided below: (a) Floodplain overlay district. The floodplain overlay district is subject to the Crystal city code, subsection 515.09 (b) Shoreland overlay district. The shoreland overly district is subject to the Crystal city code, subsection 515.11 (c) Planned development overlay district. The planned development overlay district is subject to the Crystal city code, subsection 515.13. (d) Transient-oriented development overlay district. The transient-oriented development overlay district is subject to the Crystal city code, subsection 515.15. 515.09. Floodplain overlay district (FP). Subd. 1. Statutory authorization. The legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103F and Chapter 462 delegated the responsibility to local government units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. Subd. 2. Purpose. (a) This subsection regulates development in the flood hazard areas of the City. These flood hazard areas are subject to periodic inundation, which may result in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base. It is the purpose of this subsection to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by minimizing these losses and disruptions. (b) National flood insurance program compliance. This subsection is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59 -78, as amended, so as to maintain the community’s eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. (c) Preservation. This ordinance is also intended to preserve the natural characteristics and functions of watercourses and floodplains in order to moderate flood and stormwater impacts, improve water quality, reduce soil erosion, protect aquatic and riparian habitat, provide recreational opportunities, provide aesthetic benefits and enhance community and economic development. Subd. 3. General provisions. This subsection adopts the floodplain maps applicable to the City and includes three floodplain districts: Floodway, Flood Fringe, and General Floodplain (collectively, “Flood Districts”). 74 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Resources (DNR) prior to adoption. The Commissioner must approve the amendment prior to community approval. (c) Map revisions require ordinance amendments. The floodplain district regulations must be amended to incorporate any revisions by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the floodplain maps adopted in the Crystal city code, subsection 515.03. 515.11. Shoreland overlay district. Reserved. 515.13. Planned development overlay district (PD). Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the planned development overlay district (PD) district is to provide a district which will encourage the following: (a) Flexibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building design, construction and land development.encourage multi-modal streets that balance the needs for all users, to permit a range of compatible uses that permit conversion of existing buildings, and development of new buildings. Within the TC- PD district area, such flexibility also promotes the transformation of the city’s main commercial area into a more compact mixed-use area. (b) Provision of housing affordable to all income groups. (c) Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sitings, and the clustering of buildings and land uses. (d) Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space, and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, poor soils and trees. (e) More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities through mixing of land uses, and assembly and development of land in larger parcels. (f) In exchange for relaxing site development standards such as building setbacks or height, or subdivision standards such as street widths, the city receives a development that has a high quality of design, compatible with surrounding land uses. (g) Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city. (h) Development which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Subd. 2. Uses. Except for those uses in the TC-PD district which have separate requirements in this section, Within within the PD district all permitted, accessory and temporary uses of the underlying zoning district are allowed. As part of the flexibility allowed in the PD district, the city council may, but is not obligated to, allow uses with the PD site that are only allowed in other zoning districts. Uses allowed by conditional use permit must be reviewed for compliance with the PD site plan and with the applicable conditional use permit standards in this UDC. 75 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Subd. 3. Development standards. Except for the TC-PD district, which has separate requirements in subd. 4 of this section, Within within the PD district all development must shall be in compliance with the following: (a) Each PD must have a minimum area of two acres, excluding areas within a public right- of-way, designated wetland or floodplain overlay district, unless the applicant can demonstrate the existence of one or more of the following: i) Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. ii) The property is directly adjacent to or across a right-of-way from property which has been developed previously as a PD and will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved development. iii) The property is located in a transitional area between different land use categories or it is located on an arterial street as defined in the comprehensive plan. (b) If a particular PD would provide an extraordinary benefit to the community, or if a PD site has extraordinary characteristics that make development difficult, the city council may approve a density of up to 10% more than the maximum identified in the comprehensive plan. (c) A PD site may have more than one principal building or multiple land uses in accordance with subdivision 2 of this subsection. (d) A residential PD or residential area of a mixed use PD must provide a minimum of 10% of the gross project area in private recreational uses for project residents. Such area must be developed and used for active or passive recreational uses suited to the needs of the residents of the project, including swimming pools, trails, nature areas, picnic areas, tot lots and saunas. This requirement may be waived if the city council finds that adequate recreational opportunities are available sufficiently near the PD to make this requirement duplicative, or if the PD is too small for this requirement to be feasible. (e) The development standards as provided in the Crystal city code, section 520 and the signage requirements as provided in the Crystal city code, section 530, apply to a PD as deemed appropriate by the city. Subd. 4. Development standards for the TC-PD district. Within the TC-PD district, all development shall be in compliance with the following: (a) Uses. (1) Permitted principal uses. All permitted principal uses allowed in the TC district in Table 3 are also allowed in the TC-PD district. The following additional principal uses are also allowed in the TC-PD district. Unless otherwise noted, all uses are allowed without a conditional use permit, but whether the use is permitted or conditional, it shall adhere to any use-specific standards. 76 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (i) Day care facilities, adult (ii) Dwellings, one-family attached (iii) Hospitals (iv) Hotel, motel, and extended stay establishments (v) Industrial uses (indoors) (vi) Private recreational facilities, indoor (vii) Public or semi-public buildings, with a conditional use permit (viii) Religious institutions, with a conditional use permit (ix) Schools, elementary or secondary, with a conditional use permit (x) Schools, nursery or preschool, with a conditional use permit (xi) Schools, trade or business, with a conditional use permit (2) Accessory uses. All permitted accessory uses allowed in the TC district in Table 4 are also allowed in the TC-PD district. The following additional accessory uses are also allowed in the TC-PD district. Unless otherwise noted, all uses are allowed without a conditional use permit, but whether the use is permitted or conditional, it shall adhere to any use-specific standards. (i) Drive-through facilities, with a conditional use permit (ii) Fences (iii) Garages (iv) Porches and decks (v) Signs, under the same requirements as the TC district (3) Temporary uses. All permitted temporary uses in Table 5 are allowed in the TC- PD district. The use shall comply with any time limits, required permits, and use specific-standards listed in that table. (b) Densities. Residential densities shall be constructed to a density of 16 to 40 units per gross acre. (c) Building design. All new buildings within the TC-PD district shall adhere to the TC district site development standards for building placement, height and facades in the Crystal city code, section 515.05, subd. 5. (d) Parking. The development shall provide parking according to the requirements in the Crystal city code, section 520.15, subd. 6. If the applicant desires to alter the number of 77 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 required parking spaces through the TC-PD approval process, the following information shall be submitted: (i) Number of customers, patients, visitors, or other patrons of the proposed use. Information shall also be included detailing the expected parking behavior of these people (i.e., how long a customer may be at the facility); (ii) Number of full-time and part-time employees; (iii) Number and approximate timing of deliveries; (iv) Such other information as may be requested by the city to determine that sufficient parking is provided for the proposed use. (e) Minimum green space. The minimum green space requirement in the TC-PD district is the same as the TC district. (f) New street locations. To create better connected streets when redevelopment occurs in the TC-PD district, new streets shall be constructed in the locations shown in Figure ___. The city will consider alternate street locations that achieve this intent. Figure ____: Location of new street connections in the TC-PD district (g) Other development standards. In addition to the standards established for the TC- PD district in this section, all development shall be subject to all other applicable standards as provided in the Crystal city code, section 520. 78 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Subd. 45. Amendments to the PD overlay district. An approved site plan for a PD overlay district may only be amended upon the classification and review of the proposed amendment as provided in this subsection. (a) Minor Amendments. (1) Minor amendments shall include changes in the site design of the applicable property that do not affect neighborhood compatibility or the public health, safety or welfare, and that do not violate any of the provisions of this UDC or the conditions attached to approval of the site plan. (2) Minor amendments are subject to a Type 1 review procedure. (3) The zoning administrator may determine that a proposed minor amendment qualifies as a major amendment, requiring a Type 2 review procedure as provided in subdivision 4 of this subsection. (b) Major Amendments. Major amendments shall include all changes that are not classified as minor amendments above and shall be subject to a Type 2 review procedure. A major amendment may include: (1) A substantial alteration of the location of buildings, parking areas or roads; (2) An increase or decrease in the number of residential dwelling units by more than 5%; (3) An increase of the gross floor area of non-residential buildings by more than 5% or an increase of the gross floor area of any individual building by more than 10%; (4) An increase in the number of stories of any building; (5) A decrease in the amount of open space by more than 5% or an alteration which changes its original design or intended use; or (6) The creation of non-compliance with any special condition attached to the approval of the site plan. 515.15. Transit oriented development overlay district. Reserved. 515.17. Permitted principal uses. Subd. 1. General provisions. Table 3 lists the principal uses allowed within all zoning districts except for the overlay zoning districts. Except for the TC-PD district, which has separate 79 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 requirements, The the uses permitted in the overlay districts shall be controlled by the underlying base zoning district. Subd. 2. Explanation of table of permitted uses. (a) Organization of table. Table 3 organizes the uses by use categories and use types. (1) Use categories. The use categories provide a systematic basis for assigning present and future land uses into broad general classifications (e.g., household living, commercial, etc.). The use classifications then organize land uses and activities into specific “use types” based on common functional, product, or physical characteristics, such as the type and amount of activity, the type of customers or residents, how goods or services are sold or delivered, and site conditions. (2) Use types. The use categories are divided into specific use types. The use types identify the specific uses that are considered to fall within characteristics identified in the broader use category. For example, one-family or two-family are some of the specific use types that fall under the “household living” use category. (b) Symbols in table. The symbols used in Table 3 are defined as follows: (1) Permitted uses (P). A “P” in a cell indicates that a use type is allowed by-right in the respective zoning district subject to compliance with the use-specific standards set forth in the final “use-specific standards” column of Table 3. Permitted uses are subject to all other applicable standards of this UDC; (2) Conditional uses (C). A “C” in a cell indicates that a use type is allowed as a conditional use in the respective zoning district subject to compliance with the use- specific standards set forth in the final “use-specific standards” column of Table 3 and approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with the Crystal city code, subsection 510.19. Conditional uses are subject to all other applicable standards of this UDC. (3) Prohibited uses (--). A cell with a “--" indicates that the listed use type is prohibited in the respective zoning district. (4) Use-specific standards. The “use-specific standards” column of Table 3 cross- reference standards that are specific to an individual use type and are applicable to that use in all districts unless otherwise stated in the use-specific standards. (5) Unlisted uses. If an application is submitted for a use that is not listed in Table 3, the zoning administrator is authorized to classify the new or unlisted use, with consultation from appropriate city departments, into an existing use type that most closely fits the new or unlisted use. If no similar use determination can be made, the zoning administrator shall refer the use to the planning commission, who may initiate an amendment to the text of this UDC to clarify where and how the use should be permitted. 80 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 3: Permitted Principal Uses Use Category and Use Type P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use - = Not Permitted Base Zoning Districts Use-Specific Standards in Section: R-1 R-2 R-3 C TC I AP Residential Use Category Bed and Breakfast Establishments C C C - - - - 515.19, subdivision 2 (a) Dwellings, Multi-Family - P P - P - - 515.19, subdivision 2 (b) Dwelling, One-Family, Attached - P P - - - - 515.19, subdivision 2 (c) Dwelling, One-Family, Detached P P - - - - - 515.19, subdivision 2 (d) Dwellings, Two-Family P P P - - - - Group Living Use Category Specialized Care Facilities C C P P - - - 515.19, subdivision 3 (a) State Licensed Residential Facility P P P - - - - Commercial Use Category Airport Facilities - - - - - - P 515.19, subdivision 4 (a) Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinics [1] - - - P P P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (b) Banks or Financial Institutions - - - P P - - Banquet Halls or Event Centers - - - C - C - Brewer Taprooms, Brewpubs or Microdistillery - - - P P P - 1200 Clubs or Lodges - - - P P P - Convenience Stores - - - P P - - Day Care Facilities, Adult C C C P _ P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (c) 81 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 3: Permitted Principal Uses Use Category and Use Type P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use - = Not Permitted Base Zoning Districts Use-Specific Standards in Section: R-1 R-2 R-3 C TC I AP Day Care Facilities, Group Family P P P - - - - Funeral Homes - - - P - - - Greenhouses, Garden and Landscaping Sales and Service - - - P - P - Hotel, Motel, Extended Stay Establishments - - - P - P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (d) Kennels, Commercial [1] - - - P - P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (e) Offices, Professional - C C P P P P 515.19, subdivision 4 (f) Parking Ramps or Structures - - - P P P P 515.19, subdivision 4 (g) Personal Services [2] - C C P P P 515.19, subdivision 4 (h) Restaurants or Eating Establishments [3] - C C P P P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (hi) Retail Establishments [4] - C C P P P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (ij) Theater, Indoor - - - P P - - Vehicle Repair - - - C - P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (jk) Vehicle, Boat or Recreational Sales or Rental - - - P - P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (kl) Vehicle Fuel Sales - - - P - - - 515.19, subdivision 4 (ml) Vehicle Wash or Detailing - - - P - P - 515.19, subdivision 4 (nm) Industrial, Manufacturing, Research and Wholesale Use Category Building Materials Sales - - - - - P - 82 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 3: Permitted Principal Uses Use Category and Use Type P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use - = Not Permitted Base Zoning Districts Use-Specific Standards in Section: R-1 R-2 R-3 C TC I AP Bulk Storage of Liquids - - - P - P P 515.19, subdivision 5 (a) Industrial Uses (Indoors) - - - P - P - Industrial Or Commercial Uses with Outdoor Storage of Parts, Products, or Fuels - - - P - P - 515.19, subdivision 5 (b) Self Storage Facilities - - - P - P - Warehouse - - - P - P P Vehicle Impound Lot - - - - - C - 515.19, subdivision 5 (c) Public Facilities, Telecommunication and Utilities Use Category Essential Services P P P P P P P Public utility buildings C C C C - C P 515.19, subdivision 6 (a) Telecommunications Towers C C C C - P P 515.19, subdivision 6 (b) Wireless support structures C P P P - P P 515.19, subdivision 6 (c) Public, Institutional and Recreational Use Category Cemeteries C C C - - - - Hospitals - C C P - P - 515.19, subdivision 7 (a) Private Recreational Facilities, Indoor C C C P - P - Private Recreational Facilities, Outdoor - - - C - C - Public Parks and Playgrounds P P P - P - - Public or Semi-Public Buildings C C C C - C - 515.19, subdivision 7 (b) 83 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 3: Permitted Principal Uses Use Category and Use Type P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use - = Not Permitted Base Zoning Districts Use-Specific Standards in Section: R-1 R-2 R-3 C TC I AP Religious Institutions C C C C - C - 515.19, subdivision 7 (c) Schools, Elementary or Secondary C C C C - C - 515.19, subdivision 7 (d) Schools, Nursery or Preschool C C C C - C - 515.19, subdivision 7 (e) Schools, Trade or Business - C C P - P - 515.19, subdivision 7 (f) Notes: 1. Outdoor facilities may be permitted with a conditional use permit 2. A plant may be allowed as part of a dry cleaning establishment with a conditional use permit 3. On-sale liquor, wine, or beer may be allowed to a greater extent than the permitted use with a conditional use permit. 4. Outdoor repair may be permitted with a conditional use permit. 515.19. Use-specific standards for principal uses. Subd. 1. Purpose and applicability. (a) This section provides site planning, development and/or operating standards for certain land uses that are permitted or conditionally permitted in Table 3. (b) The land uses and activities covered by this section shall comply with the applicable standards for the specific use in all districts unless otherwise specified, in addition to all other applicable provisions of this UDC. Subd. 2. Residential use category. (a) Bed and breakfast establishments. Bed and breakfast establishments are subject to the following standards: (1) The owner shall reside on the property; 84 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (2) The property abuts and the building faces an arterial or major collector street; (3) The establishment shall comply with the city’s liquor license regulations in the Crystal city code, chapter XII, as well as state health and building codes; (4) Signage is limited to one sign that indicates the name of and contact information for the bed and breakfast establishment but no other material. There may be one such sign not to exceed four square feet in area, not to exceed five feet in height if free standing, and not to be lighted unless the lighting will not negatively impact adjacent properties; (5) No external vending machines shall be allowed. (b) Dwellings, multiple-family. Multiple-family dwellings are subject to the following standards: (1) Buildings shall be oriented so that the primary entrance faces the street from which the building is addressed. (2) In the TC district, multiple-family dwellings shall be constructed to a density of 25 to 50 units per gross acre. (c)One-family attached dwellings. One-family attached dwellings are subject to the following standards: (1) Collective maintenance of building exteriors, driveways, landscaping, and common areas for one-family attached dwellings is required. (2) In the TC-PD district, one-family attached dwellings shall be constructed in the form of rowhouses or townhouses (see Figure _____). This building form shall consist of at least three dwelling units placed side by side. Figure _____: Illustration of rowhouses or townhouses in the TC-PD district (d) One-family detached dwellings. In the R-1 district, a second kitchen is allowed within a one-family detached dwelling, if there is interior and unfettered access from all parts of the dwelling to both kitchens and the property is not addressed or in any other way configured or represented as a two family dwelling. 85 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Subd. 3. Group living use category. (a) Specialized care facilities. Specialized care facilities are subject to the following standards: (1) The facility is served by arterial, collector or municipal state aid streets and such pedestrian facilities as are necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the facility; and (2) Drive-through facilities are specifically prohibited. Subd. 4. Commercial use category. (a) Airport facilities. Airport facilities are subject to the following standards: (1) Adequate controls, such as fencing, shall be provided to prevent unauthorized access onto airport property; (2) Buildings and uses shall be subordinate to the operation of the Crystal Airport; and (3) Buildings or structures shall comply with all federal and state statutes, regulations, rules, laws, restrictions, guidance and directives and Metropolitan Airports Commission rules and regulations concerning aeronautical safety and operation within the Crystal Airport and runway protection zones. (b) Animal hospitals/veterinary clinics. Except in the TC district, Outdoor outdoor facilities, such as dog kennels or runs, are allowed with a conditional use permit and are subject to the following standards: (1) Such use shall be incidental to the animal hospital use and used for the short-term boarding of animals; and (2) The applicant has demonstrated that the outdoor facility will not negatively impact neighboring properties through the use of screening or buffering. (c) Day care facilities, Adult. Picking up and dropping off of clients shall not create unsafe conditions. Loading and unloading of clients from vehicles shall only be allowed in the driveway or in an approved parking area. (d) Hotels, motels, or extended stay establishments. The property abuts at least one of the following street segments: (1) Lakeland Avenue between the Canadian Pacific Railroad and 58th Avenue North; or (2) West Broadway between Corvallis Avenue and 56th Avenue North. (e) Kennels, commercial. Outdoor facilities, such as dog kennels or runs, are allowed with a conditional use permit and are subject to the following standards: (1) Such use shall be for the short-term boarding of animals; 86 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (2) The applicant has demonstrated that the outdoor facility will not negatively impact neighboring properties through the use of screening or buffering. (f) Offices, professional. Professional offices are subject to the following standards: (1) Within the TC district, office space is limited to 15,000 gross square feet per floor. Additional square footage may be allowed with a conditional use permit, not to exceed a building footprint of 20,000 square feet. (2) Within the Industrial district, professional offices are limited to 50% of the gross floor area of the principal use. (g) Parking ramps or structures. (1) For all zoning districts, parking ramps or structures are subject to the following standards: (i) Structure entrances shall minimize conflict with pedestrian movement. (ii) The appearance of the structure entrances shall be minimized so that they do not dominate the street frontage of the building. Possible techniques to achieve this design include recessing the entry, extending portions building over the entry, using screening and landscaping to soften the appearance of the entry, using the smallest curb cut and driveway possible, and subordinating the parking entrance (compared to the pedestrian entrance) in terms of size, prominence, location and design emphasis. (2) Within the TC and TC-PD districts, parking ramps or structures are subject to the following additional standards: (i)For those parking ramps or structures located on a corner lot, the entry shall not be located on a primary building façade. (ii) The ground floor of any parking structure abutting a public street shall have habitable or commercial space for a depth of 30 feet facing the street. (iii) Parking structure height shall not exceed the finished ceiling height of the top floor of the tallest principal building within 500 feet. (iii)(iv) Upper floors of the structure shall be designed and detailed in a manner consistent with adjacent buildings. (h) Personal Services. Within the TC district, space for personal services is limited to 15,000 gross square feet per floor. Additional square footage may be allowed with a conditional use permit, not to exceed a building footprint of 20,000 square feet. (i) Restaurants or eating establishments. On-sale liquor, wine or beer is allowed, but shall occupy no more than 30% of the total floor area of the establishment. This limit may be exceeded with a conditional use permit provided that: 87 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (1) The facility is served by arterial, collector or municipal state aid streets and such pedestrian facilities as are necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the facility. (j) Retail establishments. Retail establishments are subject to the following standards: (1) Repair is allowed for a retail establishment, but a conditional use permit is required if the repair is done outdoors. The applicant shall demonstrate that such outdoor repair will not negatively impact neighboring properties. (2) Within the TC district, retail space is limited to 15,000 gross square feet per floor. Additional square footage may be allowed with a conditional use permit, not to exceed a building footprint of 20,000 square feet. (3) Within the Industrial district, retail establishments are limited to 50% of the gross floor area of the principal use. (k) Vehicle repair. Vehicle repair is subject to the following standards: (1) The property abuts at least 1 of the following street segments: (i) Lakeland Avenue/Bottineau Boulevard between the Canadian Pacific Railroad and 56th Avenue North; (ii) West Broadway between Corvallis Avenue and 56th Avenue North; or (iii) Winnetka Avenue between 36th Avenue North and a point 660 feet north of 36th Avenue North; and (2) There is no outdoor parking or storage of vehicles that are to be worked on, are being worked on, or have been worked on. (l) Vehicle, boat, or recreational sales or rental. Vehicle, boat, or recreational sales or rental is subject to the following standards: (1) The property abuts at least one of the following street segments: (i) Lakeland Avenue/Bottineau Boulevard between the Canadian Pacific Railroad and 56th Avenue North; (ii) West Broadway between Corvallis Avenue and 56th Avenue North; or (iii)Winnetka Avenue between 36th Avenue North and a point 660 feet north of 36th Avenue North; (2) There is no outdoor parking or storage of inoperable, unlicensed, abandoned or junk vehicles; and (3) No vehicle or equipment shall exceed 32 feet in length. (m) Vehicle fuel sales. Vehicle fuel sales are subject to the following standards: 99 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (f) Schools, trade or business. The facility is served by arterial, collector or municipal state aid streets and such pedestrian facilities as are necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the facility. 515.21. Permitted accessory uses and structures. Subd. 1. Purpose. This subsection authorizes accessory uses and structures that are incidental and customarily subordinate to principal uses. The intent of this subsection is to allow accessory uses while not creating adverse impacts on surrounding lands. Subd. 2. General provisions. (1) Table 4 lists the accessory uses allowed within all zoning districts except for the overlay zoning districts. Except for the TC-PD district which has separate requirements, The the uses permitted in the overlay districts shall be controlled by the underlying base zoning district. (2) Small accessory uses such as arbors, benches, doghouses, play sets, garden decorations, pergolas, and firewood cribs are exempt from the provisions of this subsection, but cannot be located in public rights-of-way. (3) Tents, play houses, or similar structures shall not be used as temporary or permanent dwelling units, but may be used for recreational purposes. (4) Any accessory structure used for the parking or storage of motor vehicles, such as a garage or carport, shall have a floor constructed of poured concrete in accordance with standards approved by the city engineer and building official. (5) Accessory structures shall only be constructed concurrent with or after the construction of the principal building on the same site. (6) Uses and structures that are accessory to a conditional principal use shall be permitted in accordance with this subsection, without requiring a conditional use permit amendment, unless specifically required as a condition of the conditional use permit approval. Subd. 3. Explanation of table of permitted uses. (a) Symbols in table. The symbols used in Table 4 are defined as follows: (1) Permitted uses (P). A “P” in a cell indicates that a use type or structure is allowed by-right in the respective zoning district subject to compliance with the use-specific standards set forth in the final “use-specific standards” column of Table 4. Permitted uses are subject to all other applicable standards of this UDC; (2) Conditional uses (C). A “C” in a cell indicates that a use type or structure is allowed as a conditional use in the respective zoning district subject to compliance with the use-specific standards set forth in the final “use-specific standards” column of Table 4 and approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with the Crystal city 101 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 4: Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures Use Category and Use Type P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use - = Not Permitted Base Zoning Districts Zoning Certificate Required Use-Specific Standards in Subsection: R-1 R-2 R-3 C TC IAP Accessory Uses Assembly or gathering space - - - P P P - No 515.23, subdivision 2 (a) Day Care Facilities, In home P P P - P - - No Drive-through facilities - - - C - - - Not Applicable 515.23, subdivision 2 (c) Home Businesses P P P - P - - No 515.23, subdivision 2 (d) Keeping of Chickens P P - - - - - No 910 Kennels, Commercial P - - - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 2 (e) Kennels, Multiple Animal P P P - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 2 (f) Accessory Structures Accessibility ramps P P P P P P P No 515.23, subdivision 3 (a) Accessory dwelling units P P - - - - - Yes 515.23, subdivision 3(ab) Amateur radio towers P P P - - - P No 515.23, subdivision 3(bc) Carports P P - - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 3(ed) Clothesline poles P P - - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 3(ce) Commercial storage buildings - - - C - P P See Note [1] 515.23, subdivision 3(df) Fences and walls P P P P P [2] P P No 520.09 Flagpoles P P P P P P P No Fuel pumps, private use [2] - - - P - P P No 515.23, subd. 3 (eg) Garages, attached or detached P P P P - P P No 515.23, subdivision 3(eh) Gazebos P P P - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 3(fi) Noncommercial greenhouses P P - - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 3(gj) Off-street parking and loading [23] P P P P P P P Yes 520.15 Patios, decks, and porches P P P P P - - No 515.23, subdivision 3 (k) Sheds P P P P - P P No 515.23, subdivision 3(hl) Sidewalks P P P P P P P No 515.23, subdivision 3(im) Signs, Permanent P P P P P P P Not Applicable 530 Formatted Table Formatted Table 102 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 515.23. Use-specific standards for accessory uses and structures. Subd. 1. Purpose and applicability. (a) This subsection provides site planning and/or operating standards for certain land uses or structures that are permitted or conditionally permitted in Table 4. (b) The land uses and structures covered by this subsection shall comply with the applicable standards for the specific use in all districts unless otherwise specified, in addition to all other applicable provisions of this UDC. Subd. 2. Accessory uses. (a) Accessibility ramps. Within the TC and TC-PD districts, accessibility ramps are subject to the following standards: (1) To reduce visibility, accessibility ramps shall, to the extent practicable, be located to the side or rear of the building. Table 4: Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures Use Category and Use Type P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use - = Not Permitted Base Zoning Districts Zoning Certificate Required Use-Specific Standards in Subsection: R-1 R-2 R-3 C TC I AP Solar energy systems P P P P P P P No 515.23, subdivision 3(jn) Swimming pools, hot tubs, and spas P P P P P - - No 515.23, subdivision 3(k)o Television and radio antennae P P P P P P P No 515.23, subdivision 3(lp) Tennis and other recreational courts P P P - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 3(mq) Treehouses P P - - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 3(nr) Workshops P P - - - - - No 515.23, subdivision 3(os) Notes: 1. A zoning certificate is only required for commercial storage buildings in the Industrial and Airport zoning districts. 2. Fences are not allowed in the TC district. 3. Parking lots are not allowed for one or two family dwellings. Loading spaces are not allowed in residential districts or the TC district. 103 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (2) If an accessibility ramp is located in the front of the building, the ramp shall meet the following requirements: (i) The ramp shall not exceed four feet in width leading to an entrance landing and handrails not more than three feet in height and not more than 50 percent opaque. (ii) The entrance landing shall not exceed 36 square feet in area. (b) Assembly or gathering space. Adequate parking shall be provided for both the assembly or gathering space and the principal use on the property. (c) Drive-through facilities. Drive-through facilities are subject to the following standards: (1) The establishment is served by arterial, collector, or municipal state aid streets and such pedestrian facilities as are necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the facility. The city council may require the applicant to provide a traffic study prepared by a professional engineer for the proposed use, and may base its findings of fact on said study or other information related to potential traffic impacts on the street system and adjacent land uses; (2) Audible electronic devices such as loudspeakers, automobile service order devices, and similar instruments shall not be located within 100 feet of any residential dwelling unit, and shall not be audible at levels greater than those established as provided in the Crystal city code, chapter 6; (3) All drive-through elements including, but not limited to, menu boards, stacking lanes, trash receptacles, loudspeakers, drive up windows, and other objects associated with the drive-through area shall be located in the side or rear yard of a property to the maximum extent feasible, except in the TC-PD district where this shall be a mandatory requirement, and shall not cross, interfere with, or impede any public right-of-way; and (4) A fence or vegetative screen of six feet in height shall be installed and maintained along any property line abutting a property used for residential purposes. Such screen shall also lessen the negative impact of vehicle headlights on adjacent properties. (d) Home businesses. Home businesses are subject to the following standards: (1) No home business shall be permitted which results in or generates more traffic than two customer cars at any one given point in time; (2) The home business may employ up to two employees who do not reside on the premises; (3) Home businesses shall not create nuisances as provided in the Crystal city code, chapters 6 and 20. Activities conducted and equipment or material used shall not change the fire safety or occupancy classifications of the premises. The use shall 106 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (5) The architectural style is compatible with the principal building and surrounding land uses. Exterior building design and materials shall comply with the provisions as provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.05; and (6) The use will not conflict with the character of development intended for the zoning district. (e) Fuel pumps, private use. Private fuel pumps for use by commercial businesses are allowed, provided that the current business, or its successor business, only uses the fuel pumps for its vehicles and equipment and does not allow them to be used by the general public. For the purposes of this UDC, private fuel pumps do not include those fuel pumps in use by a vehicle fuel sales business as allowed in Table 3. (e) Garages and carports, detached. Detached garages and carports are subject to the following standards: (1) For one and two family dwellings, the cumulative area of all detached accessory buildings on the property shall not exceed the finished floor area of the residential portion of the principal building; (2) For multiple family dwellings, detached garages shall be designed to meet the minimum number of required parking spaces and required setbacks. To the extent practicable, garages shall be located to the side or rear of the building; and (3) Garages shall not be constructed of the following materials: fabric, canvas, concrete block, cloth, plastic sheets, tarps, unfinished or corrugated metal, exposed plywood, particle board, or similar materials. (f) Gazebos. Gazebos are subject to the following standards: (1) The cumulative area of all detached accessory buildings on the property shall not exceed the finished floor area of the residential portion of the principal building; and (2) Gazebos shall not be constructed of the following materials: fabric, canvas, concrete block, cloth, plastic sheets, tarps, unfinished or corrugated metal, exposed plywood, particle board, or similar materials. (g) Noncommercial greenhouses. Noncommercial greenhouses are subject to the following standards: (1) Shall be located in the rear yard; (2) Shall be limited to one per property; and (3) The cumulative area of all detached accessory buildings on the property shall not exceed the finished floor area of the residential portion of the principal building. (h) Patios, decks and porches. Within the TC district, patios, decks and porches are subject to the following standards: 107 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (1) Porches and decks are not permitted. (2) Balconies are subject to the standards in the Crystal city code section 515.05, subd. 5. (i) Sheds. Sheds are subject to the following standards: (1) The cumulative area of all detached accessory buildings on the property shall not exceed the finished floor area of the residential portion of the principal building; and (2) Sheds shall not be constructed of the following materials: fabric, canvas, concrete block, cloth, plastic sheets, tarps, unfinished or corrugated metal, exposed plywood, particle board, or similar materials. (j) Sidewalks. Sidewalks are subject to the following standards: (1) Sidewalks on private property for one and two family dwellings shall be no more than four feet in width; and (2) Sidewalks open for use by the general public, such as for multiple family dwellings, institutional, or commercial uses, shall comply with the width requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and with the requirements in the Crystal city code, chapter 8. (3) Within the TC and TC-PD districts when properties are redeveloped, sidewalks shall be installed along all existing and proposed street frontages to a minimum width of six feet. (k) Solar energy systems. Solar energy systems are subject to the following standards: (1) Visibility. (i) Building-mounted solar energy systems shall be designed to be flush- mounted with the roof when facing a public right-of-ways other than an alley; (ii) Building-integrated photovoltaic systems shall be allowed regardless of visibility, provided the building component in which the system is integrated meets all required setback or other standards for the district in which the building is located; (2) Feeder lines. Any electric lines accompanying a solar energy system, other than those attached to on- site structures by leads, shall be buried within the subject parcel; and (3) Abandonment. A solar energy system that is allowed to remain in a nonfunctional or inoperative state for a period of twelve consecutive months, and which is not brought in operation within the time specified by the city, shall be presumed abandoned and shall constitute a public nuisance that may be removed by the City and the costs thereof certified as a special assessment against the owner of the property on which the abandoned solar energy system was located. 108 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (l) Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas. Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas are subject to the following standards: (1) In the commercial zoning district, swimming pools, hot tubs, and spas are limited to use at health clubs private indoor recreational facilities and hotels, motels, and extended stay establishments. (2) Within the TC district, swimming pools, hot tubs, and spas are limited to use at apartment buildings. (3) Within the TC-PD district, swimming pools, hot tubs and spas are limited to apartment buildings, private indoor recreational facilities, and hotels, motels, and extended stay establishments. (m) Television and radio antennae. Television and radio antenna are subject to the following standards: (1) Satellite dishes may not exceed 40 inches in diameter. (n) Tennis and other recreational courts. Noncommercial outdoor tennis and other recreational courts are subject to the following standards: (1) Court fencing shall comply with the requirements as provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.09; and (2) Court lighting shall not exceed a height of 20 feet, measured from the court surface. The lighting shall be directed downward and shall only illuminate the court. (o) Treehouses. Treehouses shall be attached exclusively to trees and used solely for recreational purposes, shall not exceed 120 square feet in size, shall not be located less than ten feet from the front lot line, and shall consist only of earth-tone materials or colors. (p) Workshops. Workshops are subject to the following standards: (1) The footprint for an accessory structure intended as a workshop for artwork, crafts, light hand manufacturing, or hobbies shall not occupy an area larger than 25 percent of the finished floor area of the dwelling. If a workshop is combined with a detached garage or shed, it shall conform to the size and setback limitations for those uses; (2) Workshops shall not be constructed of the following materials: fabric, canvas, concrete block, cloth, plastic sheets, tarps, unfinished or corrugated metal, exposed plywood, particle board, or similar materials; and (3) If a workshop is operated as a home business, it shall adhere to the requirements for home businesses in this section. 515.25. Permitted temporary uses and structures. 109 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Subd. 1. Purpose. This section allows for the establishment of certain temporary uses and structures of limited duration, provided that such uses or structures do not negatively affect adjacent properties, and provided that such uses or activities are discontinued upon the expiration of a set time period. Temporary uses and structures shall not involve the construction or alteration of any permanent building or structure. The regulations of this section are not applicable to special events that are otherwise subject to leases, permits, or other forms of permission that are duly established between the special event organization and the City. Subd. 2. General provisions. Table 5 lists the temporary uses allowed within all zoning districts except for the overlay zoning districts. Except for the TC-PC district, which has separate requirements, The the uses permitted in the overlay districts shall be controlled by the underlying base zoning district. Subd. 3. Symbols in Table. The symbols used in Table 5 are defined as follows: (a) Permitted uses (P). A “P” in a cell indicates that a use type is allowed by-right in the respective zoning district subject to compliance with the use-specific standards set forth in the final “use-specific standards” column of Table 5. Permitted uses are subject to all other applicable standards of this UDC. (b) Prohibited uses (-). A cell with a “-" indicates that the listed use type is prohibited in the respective zoning district. (c) Allowable duration. The “allowable duration per site” column states how long a specific temporary use or structure is allowed. (d) Permit required. The “permit required” column defines if the proposed temporary use or structure requires approval of a zoning certificate or other permit. (e) Use-specific standards. The “use-specific standards” column of Table 5 cross- reference standards that are specific to an individual use type and are applicable to that use in all districts unless otherwise stated in the use-specific standards. (f) Unlisted uses. If an application is submitted for a use that is not listed in Table 5 the zoning administrator is authorized to classify the new or unlisted use, with consultation from appropriate city departments, into an existing use type that most closely fits the new or unlisted use. If no similar use determination can be made, the zoning administrator shall refer the use to the planning commission, who may initiate an amendment to the text of this UDC to clarify where and how the use should be permitted. 110 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 5: Permitted Temporary Uses and Structures Use Category and Use Type P = Permitted Use - = Not Permitted Base Zoning Districts R-1 R-2 R-3 C TC I AP Allowable Duration (per site) Permit Required Use- Specific Standards in Section: Construction Dumpster P P P P P P P No more than three consecutive months in any 12-month period See city code section 605 515.27, subdivision 2; 605 Garage/Yard Sales P P P - - - - Maximum of three consecutive days, four times per calendar year per site No 515.27, subdivision 3 Outdoor dining [1] P P P P P P P 270 days per site per calendar year Zoning Certificate (Type 1 Review) [2] 515.27, subdivision 4 Outdoor sales [1] - - - P P P - 180 days per site per calendar year Zoning Certificate (Type 1 Review) 515.27, subdivision 5 Portable Storage Container P P P P - P P 60 days per site per calendar year No 515.27, subdivision 6 Signs, Temporary P P P P P P P See section 530 Sign Permit 530 Notes: 1. Outdoor seating for cafes or restaurants or outdoor sales areas for retail establishments may be permitted as a permanent use with a conditional use permit. 2. A zoning certificate is not required for a mobile food unit. 515.27. Use-specific standards for temporary uses and structures. 112 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 outdoor dining area is adjacent to a sidewalk or other facility that is closed to vehicular traffic, no railing or fencing shall be required; (4) Umbrellas, or other protective elements, that shelter diners from the elements shall be secured so as not to create a hazard; and (5) Enclosing an outdoor dining area either by a permanent roof or to expand the existing structure shall meet all the requirements of a building within the applicable zoning district. (6) Within the TC and TC-PD districts, outdoor dining may encroach into setback areas or the public right-of-way, provided that the sidewalk remains clear to a width of five feet. Subd. 5. Outdoor sales. Outdoor sales is subject to the standards contained in this subdivision: (a) Retail establishments. Retail establishments are subject to the following standards: (1) The service, sale, display or rental area is hard surfaced and clearly designated on the site as being limited to the specific, approved area; and (2) The sales area does not exceed 40% of the gross floor area of the principal use excluding basement storage areas, 20% of the area of the property, or 6,000 square feet, whichever is less. (b) Vehicle fuel sales. The sales and display of merchandise is limited to the walkway adjacent to the building, but a minimum of five feet of the walkway shall be clear of merchandise to allow for safe pedestrian movement. (c) Tent or sidewalk sales on private property. Tent or sidewalk sales on private property are subject to the following standards: (1) A minimum of five feet of the sidewalk shall be clear of merchandise to allow for safe pedestrian movement; (2) The property shall contain an area that will support the proposed temporary sale of products without encroaching into or creating a negative impact on existing vegetated areas, open space, landscaping, or traffic movements. Tents shall not be located in the public right-of-way; (3) The applicant shall demonstrate that adequate off-street parking is provided for patrons. If applicable, consideration shall be given to the parking needs of other occupants on the same property; and (4) Hours of operation for the sale are limited to between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m., with each sale lasting no more than seven consecutive days. Each site is limited to no more than three sales events per calendar year. 118 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Figure 7). The location of natural grade shall be determined by the zoning administrator and shall not be artificially raised to gain additional building height. Figure 7: Illustration of height measurement (c) FAA requirements. Height requirements shall meet the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (1) Notice to the Federal Aviation Administration using FAA form 7460-1 is required prior to the following: (i) Any construction or alteration of more than 200 feet in height; and (ii) Any construction or alteration of greater height than the imaginary surface extending outward and upward at a slope of 100 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 20,000 feet from the nearest point of the nearest runway of the Crystal Airport. Subd. 6. Permitted encroachments into setback and height requirements. Structures or structural features may extend beyond the wall of the structure and into a required setback and height requirement in compliance with Table 6. Table 6: Permitted Encroachments [1] R-1 R-2 R-3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Permitted Setback Encroachments [2] Accessibility ramps May encroach into any setback, but cannot be located in the public right-of- way May encroach into any setback, but cannot be located in the public right-of- way May encroach into any setback, but cannot be located in the public right-of-way May encroach into any setback, but cannot be located in the public right- of-way May encroach into any setback, but cannot be located in the public right-of-way May encroach into any setback, but cannot be located in the public right-of-way May encroach into any setback, but cannot be located in the public right-of-way 119 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 6: Permitted Encroachments [1] R-1 R-2 R-3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Air conditioning or heating equipment 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property Not Applicable 2 feet in the side yard, but cannot be closer than 10 feet to the living quarters of a dwelling on adjacent property Not Applicable Attached decks or open porches Front/rear: 10 feet for attached decks or open porches in the front or rear yard of one or two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or porch encroaches into the 30 foot required setback Side: 3 feet Corner side: 3 feet Front/rear: 10 feet for attached decks or open porches in the front or rear yard of one or two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or porch encroaches into the 30 foot required setback Side: 3 feet Corner side: 3 feet Front/rear: 10 feet for attached decks or open porches in the front or rear yard of one or two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or porch encroaches into the 30 foot required setback Side: 3 feet Corner side: 3 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Awnings Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3feet Corner side: 2 feet Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 2 feet Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 2 feet Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 2 feet Front/corner side: May be located up to the property line Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 2 feet Front: 3 feet Side: 2 feet Rear: 3feet Corner side: 2 feet 120 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 6: Permitted Encroachments [1] R-1 R-2 R-3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Building projections or bumpouts, May encroach 5 feet in the front setback and 10 feet in the rear setback if the conditions in Note 3, below, are met May encroach 5 feet in the front setback and 10 feet in the rear setback if the conditions in Note 3, below, are met May encroach 5 feet in the front setback and 10 feet in the rear setback if the conditions in Note 3, below, are met Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Chimneys May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Detached decks and patios 10 feet for detached decks or patios in the front yard for one and two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or patio encroaches into the 30 foot required setback 10feet for detached decks or patios in the front yard for one and two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or patio encroaches into the 30 foot required setback 10 feet for detached decks or patios in the front yard for one and two family dwellings, provided that no more than 240 SF of the deck or patio encroaches into the 30 foot required setback Not Applicable Front/corner side: Patios may be located up to the property line Not Applicable Not Applicable Eaves or overhangs May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback, but cannot be located in public right- of-way May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback Egress windows [4] May encroach 3 feet into any setback May encroach 3 feet into any setback May encroach 3 feet into any setback Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 121 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 6: Permitted Encroachments [1] R-1 R-2 R-3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Landings Landings cannot exceed 4 feet by 4 feet, together with necessary steps to reach grade Landings cannot exceed 6 feet by 6 feet, together with necessary steps to reach grade Landings cannot exceed 6 feet by 6 feet, together with necessary steps to reach grade Landings cannot exceed 6 feet by 6 feet, together with necessary steps to reach grade Cannot encroach into public right-of-way Landings cannot exceed 6 feet by 6 feet, together with necessary steps to reach grade Landings cannot exceed 6 feet by 6 feet, together with necessary steps to reach grade Satellite dishes May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback May encroach 2 feet into any setback Treehouses 20 feet for treehouses in the front yard for one and two family dwellings 20 feet for treehouses in the front yard for one and two family dwellings Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Permitted Height Encroachments Chimneys Not to exceed 5 feet above the highest point of the roof Not to exceed 5 feet above the highest point of the roof Not to exceed 5 feet above the highest point of the roof Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Spires or steeples for religious institutions As determined by the City Council in CUP review As determined by the City Council in CUP review As determined by the City Council in CUP review As determined by the City Council in CUP review Not Applicable As determined by the City Council in CUP review Not Applicable 122 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 6: Permitted Encroachments [1] R-1 R-2 R-3 Commercial TC Industrial AP NOTES: [1] Encroachments are permitted as shown in the table, but in no instance shall encroachments be allowed in a platted or dedicated easement. [2] Unless otherwise described, the numerical dimensions listed in this table are the linear dimensions allowed for the setback encroachment. For example, in the R-1 district, awnings may be three feet closer to the front property line than the required front setback for the dwelling. [3] Front setback: Building projections or bumpouts to the front of the principal building are allowed, subject to these conditions: 1) Each addition shall not exceed 24 feet in width, and the cumulative width of all additions shall not exceed 50% of the width of the principal building; 2) Each addition’s encroachment into the 30 foot required front setback shall not exceed 80 square feet, and the cumulative encroachment of all additions shall not exceed 100 square feet. Rear setback: Building projections or bumpouts to the rear of the principal building are allowed, subject to these conditions: 1) The encroachment occupies no more than 300 square feet of the area within the rear setback; 2) The width of the encroachment is no more than 50%% of the lot width measured at the rear setback line; 3) The property owner removes any existing accessory buildings from the rear yard; 4) The property owner signs and has notarized a written statement to the city acknowledging that no accessory buildings may be built or placed in the rear yard and this statement will be recorded against the property. [4] If an egress window is constructed as part of the foundation of the dwelling, the egress window shall meet the required setbacks for the dwelling. 520.03. Site development standards. Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of these site development standards is to further the purpose of this UDC and the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. Furthermore these standards are intended to establish appropriate lot dimensions and setbacks within each zoning district and provide for appropriate scale of structures. Subd. 2. Site development standards. (a) Site development standards for principal buildings. Table 7 are the regulations for residential densities, setbacks, number of principal buildings, lot dimensions, building height, and green space for placing principal buildings in the city’s zoning districts. (b) Site development standards for accessory structures. Table 8 are the setback and height requirements for placing accessory structures in the city’s zoning districts. Table 7: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Principal Buildings R1 R2 R3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Permitted Residential Density Permitted Residential Density No more than 6 units per acre (gross) 6 to 16 units per acre (gross) 16 to 40 units per acre (gross) Not Applicable Regulated by use- specific standards in Table 3 Not Applicable Not Applicable Minimum Building Setbacks [1] 123 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 7: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Principal Buildings R1 R2 R3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Front 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 10 feet 1 foot minimum 10 foot maximum 30 10 feet 200’ from residential use Side 5 feet 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet 0 foot minimum 10 feet 200’ from residential use Rear 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 10 feet 3 foot minimum 10 feet 200’ from residential use Corner Side 10 feet [2] 30 feet 30 feet 30 15 feet 2 foot minimum 12 foot maximum 30 15 feet 200’ from residential use Number of Principal Buildings Maximum number of principal buildings per property One One One One Not Applicable One Not Applicable Minimum Lot Area One-family Detached Dwelling 6,000 SF 6,000 SF Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Two-Family Dwelling 12,000 SF 12,000 SF 12,000 SF Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Other Residential Uses Not Applicable 3,000 per dwelling, but in no event less than 10,000 SF 1,200 per dwelling, but in no event less than 20,000 SF Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Non-Residential Uses [3] Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 20,000 SF Not Applicable 20,000 SF Not Applicable Minimum Lot Depth One-family Detached Dwelling 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Two-Family Dwelling 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Other Residential Uses Not Applicable 100 feet 100 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Non-Residential Uses [3] 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 120 feet Not Applicable 120 feet Not Applicable Minimum Lot Width One-family Detached Dwelling 50 feet 50 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 124 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table 7: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Principal Buildings R1 R2 R3 Commercial TC Industrial AP Two-Family Dwelling 80 feet 80 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Other Residential Uses Not Applicable 100 feet 100 feet Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Non-Residential Uses [3] 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Not Applicable 100 feet Not Applicable Maximum Building Height One-family Detached Dwelling 2 stories or 32 feet, whichever is less 2 stories or 32 feet, whichever is less Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Two-Family Dwelling 2 stories or 32 feet, whichever is less 2 stories or 32 feet, whichever is less 2 stories or 32 feet, whichever is less Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Other Residential Uses Not Applicable 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is less 5 stories or 60 feet, whichever is less Not Applicable 5 stories or 60 feet, whichever is less [3] Not Applicable Not Applicable Non-Residential Uses [3] 2 stories or 32 feet, whichever is less 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is less [4] 5 stories or 60 feet, whichever is less [4] 5 stories or 60 feet, whichever is less [4] 5 stories or 60 feet, whichever is less [4] 5 stories or 60 feet, whichever is less [34] 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is less Minimum Green Space [5] One and Two-Family Detached Dwellings See note [6] below See note [6] below See note [6] below Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Other Uses 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 10% Not Applicable NOTES: [1] Setbacks for some principal uses are regulated by the Use-Specific Standards found in Table 3. [2] If the vehicle entrance for an attached garage faces a street or alley, the garage shall be at least 20 feet from the corner side property line. [3] For the purposes of Table 7, specialized care facilities shall be defined as non-residential uses. [4] Buildings in excess of this height limit may be allowed with a conditional use permit. [5] The minimum green space requirement is expressed as a percentage of the property that shall be free from any impervious surfaces. [6] In residential zoning districts, the minimum green space requirement applies only to the rear yard of one and two family dwellings. The requirement is expressed as a percentage of the rear yard that is free of any impervious surfaces: 1. Rear yard of 5,001 SF or greater: 50% 2. Rear yard of between 4,501 and 5,000 SF: 45% 3. Rear yard of between 4,001 and 4,500 SF: 40% 4. Rear yard of between 3,501 and 4,000 SF: 35% 5. Rear yard of between 3,000 and 3,500 SF: 30% 6. Rear yard of less than 3,000 SF: 25%. 125 509575v9 AMB CR225-423  Table 8: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Accessory Structures  Accessory Structure  Type R1  R2  R3  Commercial  TC Industrial  AP   Minimum Structure Setbacks  Accessory dwelling units, detached Front:  30 feet, but cannot be  closer to  the street  than the principal building [2]  Side: 5 feet [3] Rear: 5 feet  [3]  Corner  side: 10  feet  Front:  30 feet, but cannot be  closer to  the street  than the principal building [2]  Side: 5 feet [3] Rear: 5 feet  [3]  Corner  side: 10  feet  Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  Amateur radio  towers  See note  [1], below  See note  [1], below  See note [1],  below  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  See note   [1], below  Attached Decks and open porches Front: 30 feet Side: 3 feet Rear: 30  feet  Corner  side: 10 feet  Front: 30 feet  Side: 15 feet  Rear: 30  feet  Corner side: 30 feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 15 feet Rear: 30  feet  Corner side:  30 feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 10  feet Rear: 3   feet  Corner   side: 30  feet   Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  Clothesline Poles  Front: Not  allowed  Side: 3 feet  Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 10 feet  Front: Not  allowed  Side: 3 feet  Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 10 feet  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not Applicable  Commercial Storage  Buildings  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Front: 30 feet  Side: 10  feet Rear: 3 feet Corner  side: 30   feet   Not  Applicable  Front: 30  feet Side: 10 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 30 feet  Front: 30 feet  Side: 10  feet Rear: 3 feet Corner  side: 30   feet  126 509575v9 AMB CR225-423  Table 8: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Accessory Structures  Accessory Structure  Type R1  R2  R3  Commercial  TC Industrial  AP  Detached decks  Front: 30 feet Side: 3 feet Rear: 3 feet  Corner  side: 10  feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 5 feet Rear: 5 feet  Corner  side: 10  feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 5  feet  Rear: 5   feet  Corner side:  10 feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 10  feet Rear: 10 feet  Corner   side: 15   feet   Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  Detached garages or  carports  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to  the street than the principal building [2]  Side: 5 feet  [3]  Rear: 5 feet  [3] , [4]  Corner side: 10 feet [4]  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to  the street than the principal building   Side: 5 feet  [3]  Rear: 5 feet  [3], [4] Corner side: 10 feet [4]  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to the  street than the principal building   Side: 10 feet  Rear: 10  feet  Corner side:  10 feet [4]  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to   the street than the principal building   Side: 10   feet  Rear: 10 feet  Corner  side: 10  feet [4]  Not  Applicable  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to the  street than the principal building  Side: 10 feet  Rear: 10  feet  Corner side:  10 feet [4]  Front: 30 feet,  but cannot be  closer to   the street than  the principal building  Side: 10  feet  Rear: 10   feet  Corner   side: 10  feet [4]  Flagpoles  Cannot be  closer than 5 feet to any property line  Cannot be  closer than 5 feet to any property line  Cannot be  closer  than 5  feet to  any property  line  Cannot be  closer  than 5  feet to  any property line  Cannot be  closer than 5 feet to any property line  Cannot be  closer  than 5  feet to  any property  line  Cannot be  closer  than 5  feet to  any  property   line  Gazebos  Front: 30 feet, but cannot be closer to  the street  than the  principal building Side: 3 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 10 feet  Front: 30 feet, but cannot be closer to  the street  than the  principal building Side: 3 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 10 feet  Front: 30 feet, but cannot be closer to the  street than  the principal  building Side: 3  feet Rear: 3  feet Corner side: 10 feet  Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  127 509575v9 AMB CR225-423  Table 8: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Accessory Structures  Accessory Structure  Type R1  R2  R3  Commercial  TC Industrial  AP  Noncommercial greenhouses Front: 30 feet, but cannot be closer to  the street  than the  principal  building Side: 3 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 10  feet  Front: 30 feet, but cannot be closer to  the street  than the  principal  building Side: 3 feet Rear: 3 feet Corner side: 10  feet  Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  Patios  Front: 30 feet Side: 1 foot Rear: 1  foot   Corner  side: 10  feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 1 foot Rear: 1  foot  Corner  side: 10  feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 5  feet  Rear: 3   feet  Corner side:  30 feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 10  feet Rear: 3   feet  Corner   side: 30   feet   Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  Sheds  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to  the street than the principal building [2] Side: 3 feet  Rear: 3 feet  Corner  side: 10  feet  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to  the street than the principal building   Side: 3 feet  Rear: 3 feet  Corner  side: 10 feet  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to the  street than the principal building  Side: 3   feet  Rear: 3   feet  Corner side: 10 feet  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to   the street than the principal building   Side: 10   feet  Rear: 3   feet Corner  side: 30  feet   Not  Applicable  Front: 30  feet, but  cannot be  closer to the  street than the principal building  Side: 3   feet  Rear: 3   feet  Corner side: 10 feet  Front: 30 feet,  but cannot be  closer to   the street than  the principal building   Side: 5  feet  Rear: 5   feet  Corner   side: 10  feet  Solar energy systems See note [5], below See note [5], below See note [5], below See note [5], below See note [5], below See note [5], below See note [5], below Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas Front: Not allowed  Side: 5 feet  Rear: 5 feet  Corner side: 10 feet  Front: Not allowed  Side: 5 feet  Rear: 5 feet  Corner side: 10 feet  Front: Not allowed  Side: 10 feet  Rear: 10  feet Corner side: 15 feet  Front: Not allowed  Side: 10   feet  Rear: 10 feet Corner  side: 15  feet  Front:  Not allowed  Side: 10 feet  Rear: 10  feet Corner side:  20 feet  Not Applicable Not Applicable  128 509575v9 AMB CR225-423  Table 8: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Accessory Structures  Accessory Structure  Type R1  R2  R3  Commercial  TC Industrial  AP  Tennis or other recreational courts Front: 30 feet, but cannot be closer to  the street  than the  principal  building  Side: 5 feet Rear: 5 feet Corner side: 10  feet  Front: 30 feet, but cannot be closer to  the street  than the  principal  building Side: 5 feet Rear: 5 feet Corner side: 10  feet  Front: 30 feet, but cannot be closer to the  street than  the principal  building  Side: 5  feet Rear: 5  feet Corner side:  10 feet  Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  Treehouses  Front: 30 feet Side: 3 feet Rear: 3 feet   Corner  side: 10  feet  Front: 30 feet Side: 3 feet Rear: 3 feet  Corner  side: 10  feet  Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  Workshops  Front: 30 feet, but  cannot be  closer to  the street  than the principal building [2] Side: 5 feet [3]  Rear: 5 feet  [3]  Corner  side: 10 feet  Front: 30 feet, but  cannot be  closer to  the street  than the principal building  Side: 5 feet  [3]  Rear: 5 feet  [3]  Corner side: 10 feet  Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable   Maximum Structure Height  129 509575v9 AMB CR225-423  Table 8: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Accessory Structures  Accessory Structure  Type R1  R2  R3  Commercial  TC Industrial  AP  Accessory dwelling units, detached The height of the dwelling unit cannot  exceed the  height of  the principal  building or 20’, whichever is less  The height of the dwelling unit cannot  exceed the  height of  the principal  building or 20’, whichever is less  Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable  Amateur radio  towers   Tower   not to  exceed  75 feet  Tower   not to exceed  75 feet  Tower   not to exceed  75 feet  Not  Applicable  Tower   not to exceed  75 feet  Tower   not to exceed  75 feet  Tower   not to exceed  75 feet   Commercial storage  buildings  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  Not  Applicable  20 feet  20 feet  25 feet  Detached accessory buildings [6] 15 feet  15 feet  15 feet Not Applicable 15 feet  15 feet  15 feet  Essential services (such as poles or towers)  As determined by the city engineer   As determined by the city engineer   As determined by the city engineer   As determined by the city engineer  As determined by the city engineer   As determined by the city engineer   As determined by the city engineer   Fences  See  subsection 520.09  See  subsection 520.09  See  subsection 520.09  Not  Applicable  See  subsection 520.09  See  subsection 520.09  See  subsection 520.09  Flagpoles  25 feet  25 feet  25 feet 25 feet 25 feet  25 feet  25 feet  Satellite dishes  Not to exceed 4 feet above  the roof  Not to exceed 4 feet above  the roof  Not to exceed 4 feet  above  the roof  Not to exceed 4 feet above the roof  Not to exceed 4 feet  above  the roof  Not to exceed 4 feet  above  the roof  Not to exceed 4 feet above  the roof  Solar energy  systems  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the maximum allowed building height Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at maximum tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the maximum allowed building height Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at maximum tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the maximum allowed building height Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at maximum tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the maximum allowed building height Freestandin g:  20 feet  when  oriented at maximum tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the maximum allowed building height Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at maximum tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the maximum allowed building height Freestanding: 20  feet when  oriented at  maximum tilt  Building  mounted:  Shall not  exceed the maximum allowed building height Freestanding:  20 feet  when  oriented at maximum tilt  130 509575v9 AMB CR225-423  Table 8: Zoning District Site Development Standards for Accessory Structures  Accessory Structure  Type R1  R2  R3  Commercial  TC Industrial  AP  Television and Radio Antennae Not to exceed 12 feet above the roof  Not to exceed 12 feet above the roof  Not to exceed 12 feet above the roof  Not to exceed 12 feet above the roof  Not to exceed 12 feet above the roof  Not to exceed 12 feet above the roof  Not to exceed 12 feet above the roof   NOTES: [1] The tower shall be located only in the rear yard, and set back at least 15 feet from any property line. However, necessary guy wires, anchors, and wires of less than 1/4 inch may be set back at least 3 feet from any rear or interior side property line.  [2] On interior lots abutting directly on Twin Lake, a detached accessory garage, carport, shed, accessory dwelling  unit, or workshop may be erected within the front setback area provided it does not encroach into the  required front, side or corner side setback.  [3] If the garage, carport, accessory dwelling unit, or workshop does not have an eave or overhang on the side or  rear of the structure, the structure may be located to a distance of 3 feet from the side or rear property line, but the structure shall not encroach into a platted or dedicated easement.  [4] If the vehicle entrance for a detached garage or carport faces a street or alley, the garage or carport shall be at least 20 feet from the corner side or rear property line.            [5] For building‐mounted solar energy systems, the collector surface and mounting devices shall not extend  beyond the required setbacks on which the building is mounted. For freestanding solar energy systems, the  system may not extend into the following setbacks when oriented at minimum design tilt:  Front: 30 feet, but cannot be located closer to the street than the principal building; Side: 5 feet; Rear: 5 feet;  Corner side: 10 feet. [6] For the purposes of this maximum height requirement, detached accessory buildings are defined as carports, detached garages, gazebos, noncommercial greenhouses, sheds and workshops. Some of these structures may not be allowed in every zoning district.   133 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Figure 10: Fence location on corner residential lot (principal building facing longer side) (3) Fences in non-residential districts. Fences in non-residential districts, including the TC-PD district, shall comply with the following: (i) For interior lots, fences shall not be taller than 4.5 feet in the front yard and 8.5 feet in the side or rear yard; and (ii) For corner lots, fence height is determined in the same manner as for corner residential lots (see Figures 9 and 10), except that the maximum height shall be 8.5 feet where a 6.5 feet fence is allowed. (iii) Fence height in front or corner side yards may exceed 4.5 feet in height up to a maximum of 8.5 feet if the fence is used as screening as allowed in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.13. (b) Locational requirements. (1) Fences may be located within a drainage and utility easement in side and rear yards. Where such fences are installed, the city will not be responsible for repairing or replacing the fence if work is done in the easement. (2) Fences shall comply with the site distance triangle requirements as provided in the Crystal city code, chapter 8. (3) All fences, including footings, shall be located entirely upon the property where the fence is located. It is the property owner’s responsibility to locate property lines prior to installing a fence. (c) Design and maintenance requirements. 134 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (1) Barbed wire, razor wire, concertina, dannert, and above-ground electrical fences are prohibited. In the TC-PD district chain-link fences are also prohibited. (2) Fences taller than four feet shall have posts in the ground at least ½ of the height of the fence. (3) Fences shall be maintained in good repair. Any fence that is potentially dangerous or in disrepair shall be removed or repaired. Subd. 2. Retaining wall requirements. (a) Retaining walls supporting an embankment to be retained on any lot that exceeds 48 inches in height shall be benched, so that no individual vertical segment of a retaining wall exceeds a height of six feet except where the city engineer determines that topography requires a wall of greater height. Each individual horizontal bench segment, so constructed, shall be a minimum width of 36 inches (See Figure 11). (b) Retaining walls over 48 inches, measured from the top of the footing to the top of the wall, are required to be designed and certified by a registered professional licensed in Minnesota. Figure 11: Retaining walls shall be benched, or terraced, so that no individual wall exceeds a height of six feet. 520.11. Landscaping. Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this subsection is to promote the beautification of the city and to generally protect the public welfare through the city’s authority to regulate land use in a method that utilizes the benefits of landscaping. Specifically, it is the purpose of this section to: (a) Preserve and enhance the variety and extent of the city’s urban forest as an integral part of this city’s identify and infrastructure; (b) Protect privacy and provide buffering between land uses of differing intensities; and (c) Increase and maintain property values. 142 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (1) A landscaped buffer of the minimum setback area shall be provided between the parking lot and the property line of the residential use; (2) The landscaping shall have a minimum height of 36 inches and be designed and maintained to screen cars from view of the residential use. Screening may consist of shrubs, planters, solid decorative walls, or other screening devices which meet the intent of this requirement. (3) Shade trees shall also be provided at the rate of one for each 30 linear feet of landscaped area along the property line between the parking lot and the residential use. (e) Parking lots in the TC and TC-PD districts: Parking lots in the TC and TC-PD districts shall be screened from streets and sidewalks by a masonry retaining wall or evergreen hedge a minimum of 36 inches and a maximum of 48 inches in height. (e) Landscaping for parking lot interior. The landscaping for the interior of a parking lot shall comply with the following: (1) Amount of landscaping. (i) Parking lots with 20 or more spaces shall provide landscaping at a minimum ratio of ten percent of the gross area of the parking lot (including all drive and parking aisles). If parking is located on the side of the structure (not adjacent to a street) or in the rear, this landscaping ratio may be reduced to five percent; (ii) Trees not less than five feet in height and 15-gallon container in size shall be planted throughout the parking lot; and (2) Landscaping location. Landscaping shall be evenly dispersed throughout the parking lot, as follows: (i) Landscaped islands shall have a minimum width of nine feet as the narrowest dimension; (ii) Shade trees planted using an orchard-style planting (the placement of trees in uniformly-spaced rows) is encouraged for larger parking areas; (iii) The area not covered by the canopy of the tree, but within an interior landscape area, shall be covered by shrubs, grass, ground cover, landscape gravel, or mulch. 520.13. Screening. Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to increase or maintain property values and generally protect the public welfare by screening uses that could have an adverse impact on neighboring properties. 148 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (1) Table 11 defines the number of parking spaces required for each use within the city. (2) The applicant may vary from the required number of parking spaces as provided in subdivision 8 of this section. (3) Within the TC district, no off-street parking spaces are required for non-residential development. Residential development shall provide a minimum of one space per unit, plus one space per five units for visitor parking. Table 11: Parking Spaces by Use Use Type Minimum Maximum Residential Use Category Accessory dwelling units 1 space in addition to the number of spaces required for the principal building on the property Not Applicable Bed and breakfast establishments 2 spaces for the owner/occupant of the dwelling, at least one of which must be enclosed in a garage, plus 1 space per guest sleeping room Not Applicable Dwellings, one and two family 2 spaces per dwelling unit, one of which must be enclosed in a garage Not applicable Dwellings, multiple-family 2 spaces per dwelling unit, one of which must be enclosed in a garage [1] Not applicable Specialized care facilities 4 spaces, plus 1 space per 5 beds Not applicable Commercial Use Category Banquet halls or event centers See Public, Institutional, or Recreational Use Category Bowling alleys 4 spaces, plus 4 spaces for each lane Not applicable Funeral Homes 4 spaces, plus no less than 1 space per 3 seats in the main assembly hall, plus no less than 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area not used for seating. [3] 4 spaces, plus no more than 1 space per 2 seats in the main assembly hall, plus no less than 1 space per 200 square feet of gross floor area not used for seating. [3] Health and fitness club 4 spaces, plus no less than 300 square feet of gross floor area, not including court, gym or pool area, plus 4 spaces per basketball court, plus 2 spaces Not applicable 154 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (d) In residential districts, off-street parking shall not be provided in the front setback or side street setback, except for one and two-family dwellings, subject to the limitations as provided in subsection (e), below. (e) In the case of one and two-family dwellings, off-street parking is only permitted on a hard surfaced driveway leading directly into a garage. Each property may also have one hard surfaced auxiliary parking space in addition to the driveway meeting the following requirements. Those properties without a garage or with only a single stall garage may have two auxiliary parking spaces: (1) An auxiliary space shall be located immediately adjacent to one side of the driveway, immediately adjacent to one side of the garage, or as one turn-around space immediately adjacent to the driveway (see Figure 19); Figure 19: Options for locating an auxiliary parking space. (2) An auxiliary space cannot exceed 12 feet in width and 24 feet in length, and must be at least ten feet from the habitable portion of a residential structure on an adjacent property; and (3) For access to the auxiliary space, a hard surfaced taper also is permitted, provided it does not extend into the boulevard and has an angle of at least 22-1/2 degrees and no more than 45 degrees. If the property has setback or topographic constraints that prevent reasonable access to a lawful auxiliary space, then the city engineer may allow the taper to extend into the boulevard but only to the minimum extent necessary to provide reasonable access. Subd. 10. Setbacks. Except for off-street parking lots within the TC and TC-PD districts, which have separate requirements in subsection (d) below, all parking lots are subject to the setback requirements in subsections (a) through (c) below: (a) The face of the curb shall not be within five feet of any property line and the back of the curb shall not be within four feet of any property line. 155 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (b) If a parking lot for a commercial, institutional, or multi-family dwelling use is adjacent to a property used for one or two-family residential dwellings, the face of the curb for the parking lot shall not be within ten feet of the shared property line and the back of the curb shall not be within nine feet of the shared property line. (c) All setbacks near intersections of public streets shall be determined by the city engineer. (d) Within the TC and TC-PD districts, if a parking lot is constructed it shall be subject to the following setback and locational requirements: i) Off-street parking lots are prohibited in front of the building, but may be located to the rear or side of buildings (see Figure ____). Figure ___: Allowable locations for off-street parking lots in the TC and TC-PD districts (ii) Corner side property line: The face of the curb shall not be within 12 feet of the property line and the back of the curb shall not be within 11 feet of the property line. (iii) Interior side property line: The face of the curb shall not be within 2 feet of the property line and the back of the curb shall not be within 1 foot of the property line. (iv) Rear property line: The face of the curb shall not be within 4 feet of the property line and the back of the curb shall not be within 3 foot of the property line. Subd. 11. Parking design standards. Required parking areas shall be designed, constructed, and maintained in compliance with the requirements of this subsection. (a) Access to parking area. Access to parking areas (i.e. driveways) shall be as provided as follows. Requirements for curb cuts and driveways approaches are provided in the Crystal city code, Chapter 8. 159 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (2) The striping shall be continuously maintained in a clear and visible manner in compliance with the approved plans. (3) The color of the striping shall be white or yellow, unless another color is required by state law (e.g., parking for the disabled). (e) Grading and drainage. (1) All grading plans relating to the parking facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the city engineer before any work can commence. (2) All off-street parking facilities shall be properly graded and drained so as to dispose of all surface water accumulated within the area of the parking lot. (3) In no instance shall a storm drainage facility be designed to allow the flow of water into abutting property without an approved easement. (f) Curbing. The purpose of curbing is to minimize storm water runoff, protect building and parking lot edges, and increase the survivability of plants. The following standards are applicable to curbing: (1) Except for one- or two-family dwellings, all parking areas or lots shall have cast- in-place concrete barrier curb and gutter around the perimeter of the entire parking lot. The curb shall be at least six inches wide and the gutter shall be at least 12 inches wide. This minimum standard is typically referred to as “B6-12” curb and gutter. (g) Sight distances. Adequate sight distances for vehicles and pedestrians shall be provided for parking lots. (h) Parking lot landscaping. Requirements for parking lot landscaping are provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.11. (i) Parking lot lighting. If exterior lighting is proposed in the parking plan, the lighting shall meet the requirements as provided in the Crystal city code, subsection 520.07. (j) Pedestrian connections. When feasible, the parking plan shall show pedestrian connections within the property and to existing or planned public sidewalk and trail connections, except that in the TC and TC-PD districts a minimum six foot wide pedestrian access shall be provided from the principal entrance to any off-street parking lot. (k) Deviation from standards requires a detailed study. No proposed parking layout which deviates from the standards identified in subdivision 11 of this section and which could create a safety hazard(s) shall be allowed unless the developer provides a detailed report or study prepared by a registered transportation engineer who demonstrates that the parking layout is a viable alternative and is consistent with the purpose of this section. This alternative plan is subject to the approval of the city engineer. 190 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table: 14: Signs allowed by zoning district Sign Type Zoning District Sign Specific Standards R-1 R-2 R-3 C TC I AP Canopy, Marquee, and Fixed Awnings P P P P P P P 530.11, subdivision 1 Electronically controlled readerboard P P P P - P P 530.11, subdivision 2 Electric P P P P P P P Freestanding - - - P - P P 530.11, subdivision 3 Governmental A A A A A A A Monument P P P P P P P 530.11, subdivision 4 Multi-Tenant - - - P P P - 530.11, subdivision 6 Off-Premise - - - - - - - Projecting - - - P P P P 530.11, subdivision 5 Roof - - - - - - - Rotating - - - - - - - Sandwich board - - - P P - - 530.11, subdivision 7 Shimmering - - - P - P P Temporary P P P P P P P 530.11, subdivision 8 Small A A A A A A A Wall P P P P P P P 530.11, subdivision 9 530.11. Sign specific standards. The following requirements for specific sign types apply in addition to those requirements found in Table 14. Subd. 1. Canopies, marquees and fixed awnings. Signs are allowed on canopies, marquees and fixed awnings, which are an integral part of the structure to which they are attached. Within the residential districts, these signs are only allowed for multiple family dwellings, or institutional 192 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 Table: 15: Freestanding or Pylon Signs Sign Type Number Allowed Maximum Height Area Minimum Street Frontage Setback From Lot Line Setback From Right-of- Way Freestanding or pylon sign 1 [1] 25 feet 1 square foot of sign per linear foot of frontage [2] 50 feet 10 feet, and 50 feet from residential district, park, school, library, church or similar land use [3] 10 feet Notes: 1. A property abutting more than one street may have one additional freestanding sign on one of the additional street rights-of-way provided that such right-of-way is on an arterial or collector street and such sign is more than 50 feet distant from any other freestanding sign on the property. 2. The area of a sign may not exceed the following square footages based on the street the sign abuts: 1. Principal arterial - 200 square feet 2. Minor arterial or major collector – 150 square feet 3. Minor collector – 100 square feet 4. Local – 50 square feet 3. All parts of a freestanding sign (supports, structure, display, or trim) shall meet this setback requirement. Subd. 4. Monument signs. Monument signs are subject to the following standards: (a) In the residential districts, monument signs are only allowed for multiple family dwellings or institutional or commercial uses. (b) Monument signs shall meet the requirements in Table 16. (c) Except in the TC district, An an electronically controlled reader board is allowed as part of a monument sign. 194 509575v9 AMB CR225-423 (a) Wall signs. Each tenant in a multi-tenant building may have a flat wall sign in compliance with the wall sign requirements in Table 18. In addition, the multi-tenant building may have wall signage on common walls of the building as long as no more than ten percent of that wall is occupied by signage. (b) Freestanding signs. Where allowed, one freestanding sign shall be permitted for each multi-tenant building. (c) Canopies and awnings. The design of canopies shall be in keeping with the overall building design in terms of location, size, and color. No canopies with visible wall hangers shall be permitted. Signage on canopies may be substituted for allowed building signage and shall be limited to 25% of the canopy area. Subd. 7. Sandwich board signs. Sandwich board signs are subject to the following standards: (a) Signs shall not exceed six square feet in size. (b) One sign is allowed per property. Within the TC district, one sign is allowed per business. (c) Signs shall only be displayed during business operating hours. Subd. 8. Temporary signs. The temporary use of banners, pennants, balloon signs, portable signs and similar devices requires a permit. The permit is valid for seven consecutive days. Not more than six permits for each property, or if applicable each tenant in a multi-tenant building, may be granted in a 12-month period. The permit must be prominently displayed at the principal use in the same manner required for building permits. Temporary signs shall conform to the same location and dimension requirements as permanent signs. (a) Non-commercial speech signs. Notwithstanding any other provisions of these sign requirements, all signs of any size containing non-commercial speech may be posted from August 1 in any general election year until ten days following the general election and 13 weeks prior to any special election until ten days following the special election. Subd. 9. Wall signs. (a) Wall signs in residential districts. In the residential districts, wall signs are allowed for multiple family dwellings, or institutional or commercial uses, subject to the following standards: (1) Wall signs are only permitted on walls fronting on a public street or facing other property used for institutional, commercial or industrial purposes. (2) No more than one sign is permitted on each wall. (3) No wall sign shall exceed 10% of the wall area or 75 square feet in area, whichever is less.