2000 PC Meeting MinutesJa nary 10, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the following present:
Elsen, K. Graham, Koss, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom, and VonRueden. Also present were the following:
Planner Sutter and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) were T. Graham and Kamp.
Election of officers for 2000.
A_ Moved by Commissioner Eisen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to nominate
Commissioner Magnuson as Chair of the Planning Commission for the year ending December 31,
2000.
Motion carried.
B. Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to nominate
Commissioner Eisen as Vice Chair of the Planning Commission for the year ending December
31, 2000.
Motion carried.
C, Moved by Commissioner Magnuson and seconded by Commissioner Eisen to nominate
Commissioner Nystrom as Secretary of the Planning Commission for the year ending December
31, 2000.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Koss to approve the minutes of the
November 8, 1999 meeting.
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and the place as advertised for a public hearing to consider
Application 2000-1.8 for Lot Division, submitted by City of Crystal Economic Development Authority
(applicant and owner), for division of property located at 4510 Brunswick Avenue North (P.I.D. 09-118-
21 33 0099) into two lots, each of which would be sold for construction of a new single family house.
Planner Sutter reviewed the proposed lot division, indicating that proposals are in the process of being
solicited from builders potentially interested in the lots, and that the houses could be built with no
variances.
Roger Van Risseghem, 4500 Brunswick Avenue North, was interested in finding out bow close to the
property line the house would be built because in the future lie may want to put a 9 -foot addition on to his
garage. It was indicated that the house could be 5 feet from the side lot line. He also expressed concern
about a large maple tree on that site that Ile feels is dying and should be removed. Planner Sutter will
consult with the City Forester and indicated that the City of Crystal will follow the City Forester's
recommendations.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to close the public hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner VonRueden to recommend to City
Council to approve Application 2000-1.8 for Lot Division, submitted by City of Crystal Economic
Development Authority (applicant and owner), for division of property located at 4510 Brunswick
Avenue North (P.I.D. 09-118-21 33 0099) into two lots, each of which would be sold for construction of a
new single family house.
The finding of fact are as follows: The proposal complies with the requirements for lot divisions in
Crystal City Code. It will also provide additional opportunities for construction of new housing of a type
which is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment goals.
Motion carried.
4, Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and the place as advertised for a public hearing to consider
Application 2000-2.8 for Lot Division and Combination, submitted by City of Crystal (applicant and
owner), for division of property located at 6403 41st Avenue North (P.I.D. 17-118-21 14 0013) into two
lots, one of which would be sold for construction of a new single family house while the other would be
attached to and made a part of the abutting Hagemeister Pond park (P.I.D. 17-118-21 14 0059).
Planner Sutter reviewed the proposed plats and said the parcel meant for the single family house would
greatly exceed requirements for lot size in the City of Crystal. The remaining 100' would be made a part
of Hagemeister Pond park. The Planning Commission expressed concerns with adequate parking for
those wishing to use the park and questioned access to the park. Planner Sutter indicated that the City Hall
parking lot could be used for parking, pedestrian access would be through the existing path, and that the
Parks Commission and Public Works Department would be working together on any modifications to the
property such as walking trails or a possible parking lot.
No one appeared in opposition.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to close the public hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Eisen to recommend to the City
Council to approve Application 2000-2.8 for Lot Division and Combination, submitted by City of Crystal
(applicant and owner), for division of property located at 6403 41st Avenue North (P.I.D. 17-118-21 14
0013) into two lots, one of which would be sold for construction of a new single family house while the
other would be attached to and made a part of the abutting Hagemeister Pond park (P.LD. 17-118-21 14
0059).
The findings of fact are as follows: The proposal complies with the requirements for lot divisions in
Crystal City Code. It will also provide an additional opportunity for construction of new housing of a
type which is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment goals.
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and the place as advertised for a public hearing to consider
Application 2000-3.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Belt Line Pet Hospital (applicant) and Zev
Oman (owner), to move an existing veterinary clinic building presently located at 3443 Vera Cruz
Avenue North onto property located at 3200 Douglas Drive North (P.I.D. 21-118-21 23 0114)4
Planner Sutter stated that the Commission had previously approved site plan for this applicant in
November for construction of a new building, but applicant decided they would like to move their
existing building onto the site instead. The basic concept would be the same, with a slight change in
orientation and landscaping. It has not yet been determined if the existing building mects City Code, but
if not, it would be required to be brought up to code. There would be a basement under the building, with
one-half to be used for puppy training classes after clinic business hours so parking would be sufficient.
Siding and roof would be replaced to blend in more with the surrounding residential area.
Commission members expressed strong concern over the location of the entrance to the parking lot being
off 32nd Avenue rather than Douglas. They stated that Douglas Drive is heavily traveled, and people
waiting to get onto Douglas Drive from 32nd Avenue could block the entrance to the parking lot,
therefore backing up traffic on Douglas Drive and causing an unsafe situation. Planner Sutter indicated
that lie had previously spoken with the County Highway Department and they had preferred that access be
off a side street. The Planning Commission indicated that they would like the access to be off Douglas
Drive and directed Planner Sutter to contact the County Highway Department again to see if that would
be permissible. If access off Douglas Drive is not approved by the County Highway Department, then a
minimum 30' setback from the 32nd Avenue driveway and Douglas Drive right-of-way must be provided.
The Commission also had other concerns, one of which was how the City could regulate the hours the
clinic was open so it did not overlap with the hours they conducted puppy training classes. If both were
open simultaneously, they felt there would be inadequate parking at the site. Since the quantity of
parking stalls for the puppy classes was not being based on square footage due to it being a unique use,
there were also questions about adequate parking for future use of the building should the property be
sold. In addition, there is debris located at the rear of the property that the Commission would like
cleaned up.
Terry Christiansen, applicant, stated that he had no problem with relocating the driveway as proposed.
He addressed the concerns of the Planning Commission, stating that the person doing the puppy training
classes also works at the clinic, and therefore could only do after hours training. He also agreed that they
would have no problem removing the debris that could be seen visibly at the surface.
Moved by Commissioner Eisen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to close the public hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Eisen to recommend to the City
Council to approve Application 2000-3.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Belt Line Pet Hospital
(applicant) and Zev Oman (owner), to move an existing veterinary clinic building presently located at
3443 Vera Cruz Avenue North onto property located at 3200 Douglas Drive North (P.I.D. 21-118-21 23
0114) subject to the following conditions:
ii All signage shall be in compliance with Crystal City Code.
u Additional low plantings shall be added along the north side of the parking lot to enhance the
screening from the adjacent house.
u All lighting shall be in compliance with Crystal City Code. No exterior lighting shall be permitted on
the north and east sides of the building, except for necessary security lighting subject to the approval
of City staff.
Ci Moving of the building shall be in compliance with Crystal City Code.
0 No building permit shall be issued until the applicant executes the required Site Improvement
Agreement.
Li Parking lot access shall be moved to the north end of the property off Douglas Drive if permitted by
County Highway Department. If not, the setback of the driveway on 32nd Avenue shall be increased
to 30 feet from the Douglas Drive right-of-way.
U The applicant shall clean up debris visible at surface at the rear of the property.
0 The number of off-street parking stalls shall be increased by minimum of 2 stalls, yielding a total of
16 or more stalls.
Q Lower level usage shall be limited to %2 storage and '/2 puppy classes. Puppy classes shall only be
held when the veterinary clinic is not open, and shall not have participants in excess of the number of
off-street parking stalls. In the event that the property is sold or the use is changed, the lower level
shall only be used for storage due to the limited amount of parking on the site.
The findings of fact are as follows: The proposal is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance provided the
above conditions are met.
Motion carried.
6� Discussion Item: Review concept plan for 8 unit townhouse development proposed for property located
at 6900 42" d Avenue North.
Planner Sutter presented the proposed plan, submitted by Prime Builders, for the 8 unit townhouse
development on a 1.7 acre site, stating that at 4.7 units per acre it would be consistent with the density
requirements in the City's Comprehensive Plan. He also indicated that one of townhouses was shown as
facing the side of another, and that it may be possible to change the orientation of that building so it
overlooks the pond like the others. When questioned, lie stated that he did not know if soil testing had
been done on the property.
The Planning Commission had numerous concerns related to this issue. The proposed road was
discussed, addressing the location and width, and whether it would allow enough room for emergency
response vehicles. Planner Sutter stated that the width would be 32 feet, that allowing for parking on one
side there would still be 24 feet remaining, and that this is comparable to state -aid streets like 32nd
Avenue. The Planning Commission directed Planner Sutter to consult with the West -Metro Fire
Department and the Police Department to get their views on public safety access concerns.
The proximity of the buildings to the flood plain, base price and maintenance of the units, if builder
would encourage buyers to finish lower level, re -zoning of property, and whether residents have been
contacted were also discussed.
John DeVries, Prime Builders, the proposed developer of the lot, indicated that they have done soil
borings at the property. He also stated that it was not in the 100 year flood plain, and was actually close
to the 500 year flood plain. He estimated that the base price would be in the $105,000 — $110,000 area
with a mean price of $130,000 — $140,000. The townhouses would be association maintained by a
management company, but after the initial one-year contract expires, the residents could choose to self -
manage or change management companies. He also stated that the surrounding residents have not been
contacted yet.
Joel DeVries, also of Prime Builders, stated that approximately 60% of people end up finishing the lower
level of their unit.
The Planning Commission was favorable to the developer continuing to proceed with this project and
plan a neighborhood meeting to take place later in January 2000. It was also suggested that the
townhouse be turned to overlook the pond, berming be done on west side of road, and that developer keep
within the boundaries of the PUD.
7. Discussion Item: Metal as an exterior building material.
Planner Sutter suggested that since two of the Commissioners who felt strongly about this issue were
absent, that it be continued to the February 14`x', 1999 meeting. The Planning Commission agreed, but
directed Planner Sutter to put this issue toward the beginning of the agenda because it needs to be
addressed.
Information Items: Quarterly Development Status Report; Planning Commission Attendance for 1999;
and Due Dates for Planning & Zoning Applications in 2000.
Informal discussion and announcements:
Planner Sutter stated that staff would be sending minutes with the agenda summary so Planning
Commission members will need to remember to bring them with to the meeting. Chair Magnuson
requested that the non -approved Planning Commission minutes go to the City Council right away, and
Planner Sutter stated that this is the current practice and that the Council appreciates prompt receipt of the
minutes.
Moved by Commissioner Eisen and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson
Secretary Nystrom
February 28, 2000
I � 11:�►1►11►[KK�]�I�F.Xy [�7►��.�IrI]_ � ►�.�Xy [�7►1
The Planning Commission met on Monday, February 28"', at 7:00 p.m. for a work session to discuss the 8 unit
townhouse development proposed for 6900 42"d Ave. N., a concept proposal from Kevitt Excavating for a 42'
x 130' building addition at 3335 Pennsylvania Ave. N., and metal as an exterior building material.
The following were present: Elsen, K. Graham, T. Graham, Kamp, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom, and
VonRueden. Also present were City Manager Anne Norris, Community Development Director Patrick
Peters, Planner John Sutter and Recording Secretary Gail Van Krevelen. Absent was Koss.
Discussion Item 1: John DeVries, Prime Builders, discussed his proposal for the 8 -unit townhouses with
those present. Issues discussed centered around the drainage of the property and landscaping concerns.
Prime Builders stated that they have devised a grading plan to make certain there would be no standing water
on the site and to provide adequate drainage down to the pond. The City had requested drainage, and their
plan calls for drainage. Prime Builders also would like to relocate the proposed driveway closer to the
surrounding properties. They stated that in doing this, they could save the majority of the large oak trees that
are currently on the lot.
Several residents attended the work session to express their concerns, primarily about drainage issues.
Rawlins Houske, 4218 Kentucky Ave. N. felt that the oaks only benefited one property anyway, and not the
rest of the neighbors. Brett Benson, 4242 Kentucky Ave. N., asked John DeVries how close the new proposed
driveway would come to the oaks, because if they were too close they would die anyway. Based on input
from the residents, it was determined the majority were white oaks which were deemed hardier and less likely
to be affected by the driveway. Bill Mundale, 4236 Kentucky Ave. N., was questioning what the level would
be at the outlet of the storm sewer. Jerry Pastoors, 4331 Louisiana Ave. N., said he was representing a few
people and has had 38-39 years experience with the pond and he stated that he can tell you where the water
level would be when it rains. There are little outlets and since the pond was dredged he has seen it over thein
many times. He also mentioned that there has been thousands of dollars spent to improve drainage, and
suggested the City of Crystal consider doing more dredging and not wait until they get flooded out again. Jim
Murphy, 4408 Louisiana Ave. N., said that when he built his house, he was told he had to put in three steps
and he wanted to know how all of this fits in with the elevation of their backyards. He also wondered what the
zoning was for the property. One of the residents also mentioned that there is 100" of tile going in and only
18" going out and that it may be a good time to look at that. Overall, their main concern was the drainage and
how the redevelopment of this lot could negatively affect their properties.
Randy Hedlund, Prime Builders, told those attending that the highest recorded elevation was 880.7 and that
their general swale grades would be a couple feet higher than that. He stated that 40% - 50% of the 1.7 acre
property would be impervious, and if it's less than an acre of impervious, you don't provide a ponding area.
He also stated that it would be hard to show that there would be a measurable increase in elevation.
Chair Magnuson stated that if this proposal was allowed, the property would need to be rezoned, but
mentioned to the residents that the lot could be split into three and then three homes could be built. She said
that at this point nothing has been decided, and the Planning Commission was trying to work out any
problems now. Chair Magnuson requested that Planner Sutter consult with the City Engineer to see if
dredging the pond again is a feasible option and to determine how comfortable he is with the drainage issues.
Planner Sutter will also consult the forester regarding the landscaping. Chair Magnuson also polled the
residents to see if those attending had any objections to the new location of the road, and none were
expressed.
The residents requested an on-site meeting with the developers, and John DeVries stated he will be there at
noon on Saturday, March 4"'. Planner Sutter indicated he will attend, and Chair Magnuson requested that the
City Engineer be there also if possible.
Chair Magnuson stated that based on neighborhood input, she felt the biggest concerns were the water and
drainage issues, and thanked the residents for attending.
Chair Magnuson excused herself at 8:05 p.m.
Discussion Item 2: The Planning Commission members viewed the concept proposal from Kevitt
Excavating to construct a 42' x 130' building addition in the I-2 Heavy Industrial District at 3335
Pennsylvania Ave. N. Planner Sutter stated that the proposal would be a basic site plan review, and Kevitt
Excavating is requesting permission to build a block building with a shingled hip roof to be used for the
indoor storage of their equipment. Potential conflicts discussed were the close proximity of the north border
to New Hope and concern about the pond and drainage issues. City Manager Norris indicated she had
discussed the drainage issue with the City Engineer so lie is aware of it. Planner Sutter also stated that the
only residential property in the area is the townhouses on Nevada Ave. N., across the railroad tracks.
Discussion Item 3: The Planning Commission next discussed the issue of using metal as an exterior building
material. The City currently does not have an ordinance in place regulating this issue and many of the
members are concerned about this. They indicated they didn't approve of prohibiting it entirely but would
like restrictions put on the use of it. Ways discussed to do this would be allowing a percentage of the total
construction to be metal, or have input on how it can be used on the building. Several issues were brought up
for consideration. It was discussed whether to factor in the surroundings where the proposed building would
be located, and whether businesses with a known trademark (i.e. Circuit City with the giant plug) would avoid
locating here because they would be limited on metal usage. It was also brought up that metal has improved
and the product has changed, and possibly banning the least attractive of metals and being more flexible with
the others is another option. Community Development Director Patrick Peters said the City can designate
what's appropriate in a given zone, and if retail businesses want to build in Crystal they will adjust to fit the
community. He also stated that if the city has an ordinance it will be spelled out for the developers. The
Planning Commission members all agreed they need to do something about this issue.
Community Development Director Peters mentioned that the Fair School is having an Open House in May
and that it has large amounts of metal used in the construction.
Planner Sutter stated that there are no items for consideration on the March agenda, and asked if the Planning
Commission would prefer to cancel that meeting. After discussion, it was decided to cancel the March
meeting of the Planning Commission.
The meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m.
April 10, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the following
present: Elsen, T. Graham, Kamp, Koss, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom, and VonRueden. Also present
were the following: Community Development Director Peters, Planner Sutter, Community
Development Intern Daniel, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) was K. Graham.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to approve the
minutes of the January 10, 2000 regular meeting and February 28, 2000 work session.
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider Application 2000-4.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Kevitt Excavating (applicant)
and Scott V. Kevitt (owner) for construction of a 41' x 130' building addition on property
located at 3335 Pennsylvania Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-118-21 23 0009) and zoned I-2 Heavy
Industrial.
Planner Sutter reviewed the proposed addition, stating that there is industrial usage all around,
except the townhouses located to the east of the property. The proposed addition would be
located 5' from the east lot line and 3.75' from the north lot line, with eaves extending out an
additional 3', leaving 9" remaining to the north lot line which borders New Hope. Crystal's
zoning ordinance does not require a setback unless it abuts a residential property. Drainage
would be accommodated on site, perhaps with a gutter system. The purpose of the building
would be for indoor storage of vehicles that are presently stored outside in that area.
Planner Sutter also brought two issues to the Planning Commission's attention, the pipe located
on the property needs to be resealed and the berm needs to be restored so the property drains
correctly.
Planning Commission members expressed concern over the proximity of the building to
neighboring properties, and weren't convinced that all the drainage could be kept on site. It was
also brought up that the Planning Commission imposes conditions for CUPS but they aren't
monitored, and Chair Magnuson felt policing should be improved in the future. Some members
also felt that the zoning ordinance needs to be looked at and changed so a setback would also be
required in industrial areas in the future.
Scott Kevitt, owner of 3335 Pennsylvania Ave. N., appeared before the Planning Commission.
He brought up the fact that the neighbor's building is right on a lot line and its water drains off
onto the railroad property. This neighbor has also removed the retaining wall, and they are
currently discussing his need to rebuild it. He also said he would address the pipe and berm
issues, and mentioned that the berm had been damaged during the snowplowing season. The
Planning Commission questioned him as to whether the building could be moved back or the
eaves shortened. Kevitt stated that moving the addition would not be feasible, there is a garage
door in the way, but he did agree that the eaves did not need to extend 3' and could be shortened
to 12" or 18". He also mentioned that if the retaining wall is not rebuilt he would lose lateral
support and would have to extend the foundation deeper.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commission Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Koss to recommend to the City
Council to approve Application 2000-4.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Kevitt Excavating
(applicant) and Scott V. Kevitt (owner), for construction of a 41' x 130' building addition on
property located at 3335 Pennsylvania Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-23-0009) and zoned 1-2
Heavy Industrial, subject to the following conditions:
L-1 The area around the pipe running from the treatment pond to the wetland shall be re -sealed
to the conditions required by the 1995 Conditional Use Permit, prior to the issuance of any
building permit for this property.
o The berm around the wetland shall be restored to the conditions required by the 1995
Conditional Use Permit, prior to the issuance of any building permit for this property.
The building official shall determine if the proposed building can be constructed in
accordance with all applicable building codes, and shall have the authority to require the
applicant to reduce the size of the proposed addition if necessary. Additional discretion for
changes will be left to city staff because of ongoing discussions regarding the retaining wall
between Kevitt and the neighboring property.
u The building official shall determine of the proposed building can be constructed in such a
way in which all drainage is accommodated on the subject property, and shall have the
authority to require the applicant to reduce the size of the proposed addition if necessary. A
gutter system may be required on back of lot to keep water drainage on property.
The findings of fact are as follows: The proposal is consistent with City Code provided the
above conditions are met.
Motion carried.
3, Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and the place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider Application 2000-5.1,3,8 submitted by Prime Builders, Inc. (applicant) and Donald R.
Fetzek (owner), for property located at 6900 42nd Avenue North (P.I.D. 17-118-21 12 0006), for
the following:
Li Rezoning from R-1 Single Family Residential to P.U.D. Planned Unit Development; and
o Preliminary Plat for eight privately held parcels and one parcel held in common; and
u Site Plan Review for construction of four buildings, each with two attached single family
dwellings (a total of eight units), together with parking, landscaping, drainage and other site
improvements.
Community Development Intern Daniel stated that staff feels rezoning is appropriate and meets
city standards. The driveway would be 10' from the west lot line, the minimum is 20' but in
order to preserve the oak trees, the minimum requirement could be reduced if it wasn't necessary
to protect the community. Staff feels that because of the considerable screening proposed, this
can be done. There would also be "No Parking" signs posted in driveway areas with inadequate
width for a 20' fire lane and a 10' parking lane. The lot will be replatted into nine parcels, eight
of which will be privately held and the ninth (Outlot A) will be held in common. Outlot A
would have a blanket easement, the other easement on the southern edge of the property is for
future Hennepin County improvements to 42nd Avenue such as a relocated sidewalk or new trail.
Each dwelling unit would have approximately 1,800 square feet, 908 square feet each level.
All units are above 884' flood zone with the cutting and filling proposed. Drainage would be
toward Memory Lane Pond, on the east side of the property it would use a storm sewer on the
west side, and a combination of storm sewer and grading and on the east side. The City
Engineer said the plan was acceptable, but that any storm sewer piping needs to be a minimum
of 8" diameter.
Staff also recommends that tree fencing be installed before grading and that the developer get
professional guidance in saving the oaks.
Staff also brought to the attention of the Planning Commission the existence of potential
environmental issues such as possible methamphetamine production and an underground oil
storage tank. The developer has been requested to do a Phase I environmental review.
John DeVries, Prime Builders spoke to the Planning Commission and said it is very well-
defined by the MPCA how he has to deal with environmental issues such as the oil storage tank.
Also, because this was a tank used for heating one residential property, it's a small tank, and
even if all the oil in the tank leaked underground it wouldn't constitute a hazard. MPCA has
tested the ground and found nothing and he doesn't anticipate a problem with contamination.
He also stated that he has had 3 meetings with neighboring residents, and they have indicated
they don't want a fence between this development and their properties. A berm can't be used
because of drainage issues, and to the best of his knowledge no residents have objections to the
buffering proposed. He also proposed installing a central lift station rather than individual ones.
That way it would be the responsibility of the association and the pump would be larger and
better.
Donald Fetzek (owner), RR 1, Box 134, Grasston, MN spoke before the Planning Commission.
He stated that the underground tank is actually
whether that would be considered underground.
put in the provision to preserve the oak trees.
located in a concrete room, so was questioning
Later he also said he wanted to thank whoever
Jerry Pastoors, 4331 Louisiana Ave. N. was concerned about storm water drainage and feels it is
a problem in the City of Crystal. He stated that even though this 1-2 acre development alone
may not make a difference, it would if you added them all up.
Keith Stier, 6700 42nd Ave. N., also spoke to the Planning Commission. He wanted to know
how far the townhouses would be off the pond and whether they would be low income. It was
stated that the first unit would be 25 '/z feet from the property line, and they would be owner -
occupied and not targeted for low income.
The Planning Commission questioned several things. Chair Magnuson was concerned about
rezoning the property P.U.D. If there was contamination from the underground tank and the
developer would choose to discontinue the project, that property would still be zoned P.U.D.
Other concerns were whether the city engineer had addressed the drainage issue, and the size of
the spruce trees proposed for landscaping.
Community Development Director Peters and Planner Sutter both stated that the PUD is tied to
the project which includes the plat and the site plan, and if this developer doesn't perform,
anyone else wanting to develop that property must have an identical project. Community
Development Director Peters also referred to the P.U.D. section of the Zoning Ordinance, where
it says that if the contractor does not perform the City Council has the option of rezoning the site
back to R-1. Staff also stated that the city engineer had addressed the drainage issue, and that
the impact on the drainage basin as a whole would be impossible to determine because it would
be too small to measure. John DeVries addressed the spruce tree issue and said he will attempt
to provide larger trees, but they are very difficult to find and he had increased the number of
trees to compensate.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to recommend to the
City Council to approve Application 2000-5.1,3,8 submitted by Prime Builders, Inc. (applicant)
and Donald R. Fetzek (owner), for property located at 6900 42nd Avenue North (P.I.D. 17-118-
21-12-0006), for the following:
i Rezoning from R-1 Single Family Residential to P.U.D. Planned Unit Development; and
fo Preliminary Plat for eight privately held parcels and one parcel held in common; and
j Site Plan Review for construction of four buildings, each with two attached single family
dwellings (a total of eight units), together with parking, landscaping, drainage and other site
improvements.
Provided the following conditions are met:
u Basement floor plan shall be set up in such a way that the basement could be finished with
two bedrooms and a small family room if that were desired by the homeowner.
.i Units shall be constructed above the 884' flood contour and shall not abut said contour.
U Catch basins shall be installed on both sides of the driveway curb openings and the driveway
crown shall be maintained to prevent drainage across the driveway.
Either individual ejectors or a shared lift pump shall be used with the sanitary sewer.
Li The sanitary sewer and water line (and shared lift pump, if applicable) shall be placed so as
to minimize the potential for damage to the existing oak trees.
Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to grading so as to minimize the potential for
long-term loss of significant trees.
..j The developer shall retain the services of a professional to provide guidance on how to
complete the project while attempting to preserve the existing oaks.
u The flood plain volume displaced by any filling shall be less than or equal to the increased
flood plain volume resulting from cutting. The developer's engineer shall provide the
calculations to staff so that the City Engineer may verify that no net loss of floodplain
storage will result from the project.
u All signage shall be compliance with Crystal City Code.
u The driveway stub in front of unit 1 in building 4 shall be modified to facilitate backing
movements from that unit.
"No Parking" signs shall be installed along the common driveway wherever there is
insufficient width for on 10' parking lane plus the 20' minimum fire lane.
D Homeowners' association documents shall be submitted for staff review prior to second
reading of the P.U.D. rezoning ordinance, and shall include:
Language stating that long-term preservation of the stand of oak trees is desired;
Language disclosing that park and trail improvements along Memory Lane Pond are
identified as a possible future project in the City's Comprehensive Plan;
Provisions to ensure that adequate funding is available for on-going maintenance and
future capital improvement projects including but not limited to driveway repaving and
tree care.
o Park Dedication in the amount of $4,000 shall be due upon approval of the final plat by the
City Council.
o No building permit shall be issued until the applicant executes the required Site
Improvement Agreement.
The property will revert back to R-1 if work is not commenced by developer by December
31, 2001.
The findings of fact are as follows:
Rezoning. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The development
will not negatively impact the adjacent neighborhood and provides housing options to
neighbors interested in one -level living. The possible preservation of the oak stand and
other trees and the considerable open space result in a development that is sensitive to
the existing environment. The proposal meets the PUD District purpose, use, and
development standards as set out in City Code 515.52 Subds. 1, 2, and 3. It will also
provide an opportunity for construction of new housing of a type consistent with the
City's Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment goals.
a Preliminary Plat. The proposed plat is consistent with the requirements of Crystal City
Code.
J Site Plan Review. The proposed development is consistent with the requirements of
Crystal City Code.
4, Information Items: Quarterly Development Status Report (first quarter 2000).
Informal discussion and announcements:
Commissioner Koss mentioned that Glen Haven Memorial Gardens are advertising for a
mausoleum, which has not been approved by the Planning Commission. Staff said that the
cemetery has not approached the city as of yet.
Also discussed was the status of the Nafstad property. The majority of the property has now
been gifted to the city, but it appears that the city employees cut down trees without guidance.
The house located near this area has a large pine tree with roots hanging out due to the work
done over there, and it's possible they may lose it. Commissioner Koss also stated that the pond
area used to be a wetland year round before, but since being used as storage for snow during the
winter months is now full of sand and debris. They questioned also who can monitor what is
going on at a site. Planner Sutter stated that in the case of a development project the site work is
initially followed up by the Building Official but overall is a joint effort of Community
Development staff, and that concerns about the activities of other departments should be
addressed to the respective department head. Community Development Director Peters stated
that he would pass the Commission's concerns on to the appropriate staff.
Commissioner Kamp brought up the subject of metal buildings and wanted something in writing
for the next meeting regulating metal as a building material. After discussion, it was decided to
direct staff to prepare a text amendment addressing this issue.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to direct staff to prepare
a text amendment to state that corrugated metal as a building material is not allowed.
Motion carried.
Dave Anderson, Section 1 Council Member, spoke to the Planning Commission regarding the
lawful gambling ordinance. Previously it had been based on the on -sale liquor license but no
longer needs to be and he was questioning where it would be allowed. He also stated the
second reading will be on Tuesday, April 18th and if the Planning Commission has concerns or
if they can think of operating restrictions, they should let the City Council know. Chair
Magnuson questioned how they could pass an ordinance if they don't know where it would be
allowed, and was told that that's an issue that can be addressed. Planner Sutter stated that if
there was no zoning for it, it would be prohibited. Community Development Director Peters
also said that part of the licensing procedure would be to determine if it was in the proper zone.
Chair Magnuson directed Planner Sutter to check with the city attorney to determine if we can
declare a moratorium while working on the ordinance. Planner Sutter noted since that the
licensing will be tied to zoning, no such establishments could open until accommodated in the
Zoning Ordinance.
Commissioner VonRueden requested that Planner Sutter also check into the Kilmer Electric
property at 5141 Lakeland Ave. N. He stated the fence is knocked down in back and vandals
are starting wooden wire spools on fire in the wetland area.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to adjourn.
Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
,s
Chair Magnuson
r
Secretary Nystrom
May 8, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the
following present: Elsen, K. Graham, T. Graham, Kamp, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom, and
VonRueden. Also present were the following: Community Development Director Peters,
Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) was Koss.
1. Moved by Commissioner Kamp ana seconded by Commissioner Elsen to approve the
minutes of the April 10, 2000 regular meeting.
Motion carried.
2. Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public
hearing to consider Application 2000-6.8 for Lot Division, submitted by City of
Crystal Economic Development Authority (applicant and owner), for division of an
existing 127' x 290' property located at 3244 Hampshire Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-
118-21-14-0019) into two lots, one for a single-family house and the other for future
redevelopment and/or public open space.
Planner Sutter discussed the proposed lot division, stating that the property had a
wetland and bad soil on parts of the lot, so part of it may be left as public open space.
He also stated that if the remainder of the property were developed it would need to
be re -platted if divided further. When questioned by the Planning Commission
whether there would be access to the back parcels, he said that access would be off
Georgia Avenue North.
No one was heard.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the
public hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to
recommend to the City Council to approve Application 2000-6.8 for Lot Division,
submitted by City of Crystal Economic Development Authority (applicant and
owner), for division of an existing 127' x 290' property located at 3244 Hampshire
Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-14-0019) into two lots, one for a single-family
house and the other for future redevelopment and/or public open space.
The findings of fact are as follows: The proposal complies with the requirements for
lot divisions in Crystal City code. It will also provide an additional opportunity for
construction of new housing of a type which is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment goals.
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public
hearing to consider Application 2000-7.8 for Lot Division, submitted by City of
Crystal Economic Development Authority (applicant) and L. Duong and H. K.
Nguyen (owners), for division of property located at 7200 33rd Avenue North (P.I.D.
20-118-21-24-0002) into one 72' wide parcel to be retained by the current owners and
one 2' wide parcel to be acquired by the applicant and combined with property
located at 7116 33rd Avenue North for redevelopment purposes.
Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public
hearing to consider Application 2000-8.8 for Lot Combination and Redivision,
submitted by City of Crystal Economic Development Authority (applicant) and
Randy McGovern (owner), for combination and redivision of property located at
7116 33rd Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-24-0032) together with the east 2' of
property located at 7200 33rd Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-24-0002), for the
purpose of dividing the combined property into two 60' wide lots.
Planner Sutter combined item #3 and item #4 when presenting it the Planning
Commission. If approved, the width of the property at 7200 33rd Avenue North
would be reduced by 2'. The 2' would be combined with the property at 7116 33rd
Avenue North. The property at 7116 33rd Avenue North would then be divided into
two 60' wide lots to be used for new construction. He stated that the closings on the
property transfers would be held after the council meeting if the City Council gives
approval.
No one was heard.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to close the
public hearings.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner Kamp to
recommend to the City Council to approve Application 2000-7.8 for Lot Division,
submitted by City of Crystal Eco��omic Development authority (applicant) and L.
Duong and H. K. Nguyen (owners) for division of property located at 7200 33rd
Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-24-0002) into one 72' wide parcel to be retained by
the current owners and one 2' wide parcel to be acquired by the applicant and
combined with property located at 7116 33rd Avenue North for redevelopment
purposes.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to
recommend to the City Council to approve Application 2000-8.8 for Lot Combination
and Redivision submitted by City of Crystal Economic Development Authority
(applicant) and Randy McGovern (owner), for combination and redivision of property
located at 7116 33rd Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-24-0032) together with the east
2' of property located at 7200 33rd Avenue North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-24-0002), for the
purpose of dividing the combined property into two 60' wide lots.
Motion carried.
Tlie findings of fact are as fotlows. The proposals colliply will, the requircnicnts for
lot divisions in Crystal City Code. It will also provide an additional opportunity for
construction of new housing of a type which is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment goals.
5 Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public
hearing to consider text changes to Crystal City Code Section 520.23 Subd. 2 which
would add "corrugated metal" to the list of exterior building materials that are not
permitted for residential and non-residential buildings.
Community Development Director Peters stated that the Planning Commission at the
April 10`x' meeting had directed staff to draft a text change prohibiting corrugated
metal as a building material. Currently the code prohibits unfinished metal and this
would cover both finished and unfinished metal. Community Development Director
Peters also mentioned that, as proposed, corrugated metal would be permitted in
industrial areas if properly screened. He questioned the Planning Commission
whether they wanted to carry it further and prohibit it in industrial areas also. After
discussion it was decided to leave it as is, and the issue can be further addressed when
the City Code is looked at for possible revision later in the year.
No one was heard.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to close the
public hearing.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to
recommend to the City Council to approve text changes to Crystal City Code Section
520.23 Subd. 2 which would add "corrugated metal" to the list of exterior building
materials that are not permitted for residential and non-residential buildings.
Motion carried.
6. Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public
hearing to consider text changes to Crystal City Code Sections 515.35 Subd. 2 and
515.37 Subd. 2 which would add lawful gambling establishments as permitted uses in
the B-3 and B-4 Zoning Districts subject to licensing.
Community Development Director Peters stated that the City Council had voted 4-3
to license charitable gambling establishments. Such uses need to be addressed in the
zoning code because currently th_ code does not mention charitable gambling as
3
permitted or conditional uses in any zoning disirik ts, When questioned by the
Planning Commission he said that the Council action provides for the establishment
of charitable gambling operations on premises other than on -sale liquor
establishments. Community Development Director Peters also mentioned that there is
a sunset date of December 31, 2002 on the licensing ordinance that provides for these
operations.
No one was heard.
Moved by Commissioner Krueger and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to close
the public hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to
recommend to the City Council to approve text changes to Crystal City Code Sections
515.35 Subd. 2 and 515.37 Subd. 2 which would add lawful gambling establishments
as permitted uses in the B-3 and B-4 Zoning Districts subject to licensing.
Motion carried 6 — 2 with Elsen, K.
Graham, Kamp, Krueger, Magnuson,
and Nystrom voting aye and T. Graham
and VonRueden voting nay.
Information Items: Open House on Friday, May 12th from 2:30 — 4:30 p.m. at 4000
Jersey.
Information discussion and announcements: City bus tour on Tuesday, May 30th
from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. Chair Magnuson stated she will be out of town that day and
Commissioner Krueger has jury duty. Commissioner K. Graham also thought she
would have a conflict that day.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn.
Motion carried.
91
July 10, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the
following present: Elsen, K. Graham, T. Graham (arrived at 7:28 p.m.), Krueger, Magnuson,
Nystrom, and VonRueden. Also present were the following: Community Development
Director Peters, Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused)
were Kamp and Koss.
Moved by Elsen and seconded by Krueger to approve the minutes of the May 8, 2000
regular meeting.
Motion carried.
-' Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider Application 2000-9.9 for Variance, submitted by Donald J. Sommers (applicant
and owner), to reduce the rear yard setback From 30' to 25' for an addition to a single family
house located at 6721 Valley Place North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-13-0061).
Planner Sutter detailed the proposal to the Planning Commission, stating the homeowner
would like to build a four season porch and would need a variance to go approximately 5'
into the setback . The rear of this property abuts the park, there has been a history of
encroachments into the setback by surrounding properties, and a 6'variance was granted to a
neighbor in 1994 for their four season porch. To grant the variance, the homeowner would
need to show that "undue hardship" was present, and three conditions must be met. Staff
felt that although this addition would not negatively impact the surrounding area, an 8'
addition could be built and the property could still be put to a reasonable use, the lot was not
substandard, so therefore it would not meet the undue hardship criteria necessary for a
variance.
Donald J. Sommers, owner of 6721 Valley Place North, spoke before the Planning
Commission. He clarified the fact that he is not removing the current deck, but would build
the porch on top of it, making it wider, but not increasing the depth. He mentioned that
there was a city park behind his property so he wouldn't be infringing on a neighbor. He
also stated that he had spoken with the builder about building an 8' addition, and it didn't
make economic sense. The homeowner felt the addition would be beneficial to the area,
improve the value of his property, and increased taxes would benefit the city. When
questioned by Chair Magnuson if he knew that new pilings could be a significant cost, he
stated that he had spoken with a contractor and was aware of that.
Some members of the Planning Commission thought that this would be a nice improvement,
and he was only requesting what other residents have in the past. Chair Magnuson felt that
there is a hardship because of the wet area at the rear of the property and also mentioned that
the park can be very noisy at times and an enclosed porch would help lessen that.
Commissioner Nystrom disagreed, saying she didn't see undue hardship and thought too
1
many such requests are passed. Chair Magnuson questioned Planner Sutter about the 1994
variance, wanting to know why he felt it did not meet the findings of fact. Planner Sutter
stated staff felt it hadn't met the first two requirements for undue hardship.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner K. Graham to recommend
to the City Council to approve Application 2000-9.9 for Variance, submitted by Donald J.
Sommers (applicant and owner), to reduce the rear yard setback from 30' to 25' for an
addition to a single family house located at 6721 Valley Place North (P.I.D. 20-118-21-13-
0061) subject to the following conditions:
0 applicant does not exceed the depth of the deck
J applicant has a surveyor locate the footings for the four season room addition
The findings of fact are as follows: The proposed variance will not:
o impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property;
o unreasonably increase the congestion in public streets;
a increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public safety; and
a unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or
in any other way be contrary to the intent of the zoning code.
The hardship is caused by the substandard depth of the lot and;
❑ the porch and deck cannot be built without the variance;
❑ the plight of the landowner is unique to the property and not created by the landowner,
and;
0 the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Furthermore, approval of this variance would be consistent with the variance granted in
1994 for an abutting property, 6727 Valley Place, which permitted a three season room to
extend 6' into the required rear yard setback.
Motion carried 4-3 with Magnuson,
Elsen, K. Graham and T. Graham
voting aye and Krueger, Nystrom, and
VonRueden voting nay.
3. Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider Application 2000-10.3,4 for Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review,
submitted by Church of St. Raphael (applicant and owner), to allow expansion of a
conditional use in the R-1 Single Family Residential district for construction of a two -unit
2
dwelling to be used as a rectory, on property located at 7301 56`h Avenue North (P.I.D. 05-
118-21-34-0001).
Planner Sutter stated that this property is almost entirely surrounded by New Hope. Two -
unit dwellings are prohibited in R-1 zoning districts, but this is expanding a church use so it
would fall under the conditional use permit. The setbacks would be 66' on the west and 63'
on the south. The property would look residential and would be used as a rectory. The
building would be on a slab and each unit would be approximately 1,600 square feet on one
level and have a shared courtyard. Water and sewer would be connected through the City of
New Hope, as would driveway access.
Arinie Sparrow, t4845 Crow River Dr, 'Rogers, spoke on belzalf sof St. Raphael church. Shc
said the Archbishop had seen need for a rectory and recommended the priests have a new
residcnce. For 49 Years there: have always been two priests and tlicy plan to maintain that,
but may also take in studying priests. Chair Magnuson said there needs to be language
added stating that this would be used for a rectory for priests only and this is the only reason
for allowing this project to go forward,
Keith Pahl, 5432 Quebec Ave N, New Hope, stated he lived behind the site to the northwest.
He was concerned about who would be occupying the building, how close the building and
Fence would come to the rear properties, and what type of lighting was planned. He
mentioned he had past problems with [lir: administration at St. Raphael and wants everything
in black and white, Susanne Remus, sane addross, was worried that this could possibly
result In a drop-in center which happened vith the old rectory. Residents were told that
]ang,uage would be put in regulating who can occupy the property. Planner Sutter said the
fence would probably extend 8' past the residence, but will still be 115'-120' .from the House
directly behind the proposed building, and that typical residential lighting would be all that
is allowed.
Cindy Tague, 5354 Pennsylvania Ave N, New Hope, was also concerned with who would
be occupying the property. She also wanted to know the hours of construction, how they
would be accessing the property, proposed driveway location, and whether the road would
be torn up. She was told the driveway location is proposed off to the side of Pennsylvania,
but because the driveway access is off St. Raphael Drive, it is controlled by New Hope.
Staff provided her with a copy of the letter from the City of New Hope.
,lames Fossland, 5409 Quebec Ave N, New Hope, said that the layout being shown was old
and there has been an extensive addition on the east side. He felt this proposal would be
repeating what was done before, there was a previous parish that was removed and
questioned why the city is considering allowing another separate building to go up. It was
mentioned that it was thought the old parish was deteriorated and that is why it was
demolished. Planner Sutter also said that when the previous building was built the current
ordinance was not in effect.
3
Brad Richardson of Christian Builders was questioned by the Planning Commission how far
things have gone with New Hope. He said they were only in the talking stages, no
commitments have been made but there were strong indications they will work with him.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to recommend
to the City Council to approve Application 2000-10.3,4 for Conditional Use Permit and Site
Plan Review, submitted by Church of St. Raphael (applicant and owner), to allow expansion
of a conditional use in the R-1 Single Family Residential district for construction of a two -
unit dwelling to be used as a rectory, on property located at 7301 56`h Avenue North (P.I.D.
05-118-21-34-0001) subject to the following conditions:
ci In the R -I District, two-family dwellings are prohibited but churches are conditional
useS. BecaLlse the proposed two-family dwelling would by used as a residence by
priests, this application is considered to be an expansion of a conditional use. It is this
fact -- the proposed building is an expansion of a conditional use in the R-1 District —
that makes it possible for the City to consider construction of a two-family dwelling in
the first place. The only way this request can be approved is if the proposed two -unit
dwelling is an integral part of the church operations and not a general two-family
dwelling. If the two -unit dwelling were used to house persons other than priests, it
would be prohibited. For this reason, use of the two-family dwelling shall be limited to
occupancy by priests. It shall not be rented or otherwise used as a dwelling by members
of the general public.
u Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a survey and site
plan, completed by a Registered Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer, showing the
location of the new building, adjacent property lines, and necessary facilities to serve the
new building such as the driveway, water curb stop, sanitary sewer cleanouts, etc.
Copies of this survey shall be provided to both the City of Crystal and the City of New
Hope.
o For the purposes of the sign regulations, the rectory will be treated as a dwelling in the
R-1 District and not as a commercial or institutional facility.
The findings of fact are as follows:
Li With minimum setbacks of 66' on the west and 63' on the south, the proposal would
provide more than double the standard 30' setback.
zi The design of the building, specifically the use of residential -style materials and shape,
will cause it to blend in with the surrounding neighborhood better than the more massive
structures contemplated by this provision.
4
u The setbacks are so generous that the visual impact will probably be comparable to or
less than the impact that would result if standard single family lots were developed on
the site.
❑ The grassy and treed area along the west side of the proposed building will help to
buffer the new building from the existing residence along Quebec Avenue.
With two garage stalls for each unit plus two stalls in front of each garage, this building
will have four off-street parking stalls for each unit. This is double our minimum
requirement of two stalls per unit.
* There are no notable potential adverse effects of the building use as proposed.
a The proposed building can be allowed by Conditional Use Permit only if it is used as a
rectory which is an accessory use to the church. This is because, in the R-1 District, two
family dwellings are not permitted but churches are conditional use.
Motion carried
4. Public Hearing: the Metropolitan Council's Interim Strategy to Reduce Nonpoint Source
Pollution to all Metropolitan Water Bodies.
Community Development Director Peters and Planner Sutter stated that the Comprehensive
Plan would not be approved by Metropolitan Council until the interim strategy is adopted.
Chair Magnuson questioned whether the City Engineer was comfortable with this, and was
told that he was, and most is already in practice anyway.
None were heard.
Moved by Commissioner Krueger and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to recommend to
the City Council to adopt the Metropolitan Council's Interim Strategy to Reduce Nonpoint
Source Pollution to all Metropolitan Water Bodies.
Motion carried.
Discussion Item: Development concept submitted by SVK Development for 40 townhouses
and 10 single family houses on a 10 acre site located at the northwest corner of 47`h & Zane.
Planning Commission members asked staff and those members who had attended the initial
meeting what the overall feeling was. Everyone responding felt that it was much more
5
positive than the meeting for the previous proposal, residents are realizing it will be
developed and thought it was a good fit. Chair Magnuson asked whether the Fire
Department was comfortable with the street layout. Planner Sutter said they were, but no
parking would be allowed in the cul-de-sac or on one side of the streets within the
development.
Scott Kevitt, SVK Development, said there had been some subtle changes in the proposal.
The trail was moved to City property and a berm was put in so that unit #34 would have
more privacy. He stated there should be zero water problems in this area because of the
sandy ground. Planning Commission members questioned him about the depth of the pond
and how many different styles of single family homes would be built. He said he is
anticipating the first portion to be a NURP pond up to 4'-5' in depth, and the largest portion
more of a wetland area. He also said there would be at least two different styles, a rambler
and a split-level. He is expecting developiiient of the area to last 2-3 years, but would like
to build a model home that would be finished when the street is done.
Staff said that there should be a full packet ready by the August meeting and suggested that
the Planning Commission set a public hearing to discuss the matter. Planner Sutter also said
the roads in the townhome area will be public, not private, but the association would be
responsible for snow removal.
Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to set the
public hearing for August 14`h, 2000.
Motion carried.
ty- Selection of two Planning Commission members to participate in a July 27`h focus group
regarding the County Road 81 corridor (Northwest Corridor Partnership).
Planner Sutter stated that the Planning Commission can select two members to attend the
Elly 27"' Focus gToup and that Commissioner Kamp had indicated interest in sea-ving,
Commissioner VonRueden and Commissioner K. Graham also indicated interest.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner T. Graham to select
Commissioner VonRueden and Commissioner K. Graham to participate in an July 271h
focus group regarding the County Road 81 corridor (Northwest Corridor Partnership).
Motion carried.
Information Item:
u Development Status Report for second quarter 2000.
Informal discussion and announcements.
6
Planner Sutter gave a brief preview for August meeting. He expects a site plan for a dental
office proposed at 52nd and Douglas, requests for extensions for funeral home and cemetery
maintenance building, and the proposal for development at 47`" and Zane.
Commissioner T. Graham stated he doesn't expect to be at the next meeting.
Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn.
Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 9:08 p.m.
Chair Magnuson
t
a}
Sec etary Nys r I
August 14, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the
following present: Elsen, K. Graham, Kamp, Koss, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom, and
VonRueden. Also present were the following: Community Development Director Peters,
Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) was T. Graham.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to approve the
minutes of the July 10, 2000 regular meeting, with the following exception: Commissioner
Koss should have been excused for the July 10 meeting.
Motion carried.
2 Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider a request for an extension until December 31, 2001 of the previously approved
Application 99-6.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Crystal Lakes Cemetery Association
(applicant and owner), to constrict a cemetery maintenance building on unaddressed property
(P.I.D. 09-118-21-23-0006) located at Glen Haven Memorial Gardens, 5100 Douglas Drive
North.
Planner Sutter stated this was the first of three related applications, the cemetery maintenance
building, the funeral home, and development of the 10 acre site. Crystal Lakes Cemetery
Association is only requesting an extension for an additional year, nothing else would be
changing. Planning Commission members questioned Planner Sutter whether a prior extension
had been requested and if he foresaw any problems by granting the extension. Planner Sutter
said this was their first request for an extension and didn't anticipate any negative impacts from
granting it.
No one appeared to speak.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconued by Commissioner VonRueden to recommend to
the City Council to approve a request for an extension until December 31, 2001 of the
previously approved Application 99-6.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Crystal Lakes
Cemetery Association (applicant and owner), to construct a cemetery maintenance building on
unaddressed property (PID. 09-118-21-23-0006) located at Glen Haven Memorial Gardens,
5100 Douglas Drive North.
Motion carried.
:�. Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider Application 2000-11.4 for Conditional Use Permit, together with a request for an
extension until December 31, 2001 of the previously approved Application 99-3.3 for Site Plan
Review, submitted by Crystal Lakes Cemetery Association (applicant and owner), to construct
a funeral home at 5101 West Broadway (P.I.D. 09-118-21-23-0005).
Planner Sutter said that this was very similar to the prior public hearing, except the applicant
was also requesting renewal of their Conditional Use Permit in addition to the extension. He
also stated he could see no reason not to approve this.
No one appeared to speak.
Moved by Commissioner Koss and seconded by Commissioner Kamp to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to recommend to the
City Council to approve Application 2000-11.4 for Conditional Use Permit, together with a
request for an extension until December 31, 2001 of the previously approved Application 99-
3.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Crystal Lakes Cemetery Association (applicant and
owner), to construct a funeral home at 5101 West Broadway (P.I.D. 09-118-21-23-0005).
Motion carried.
t. Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider Application 2000-12.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Greg A. Bichler (applicant
and owner), to construct a 3,498 sq. ft. dental office building on property located at 5231 and
5237 Douglas Drive North (P.I.D. 08-118-21-11-0003 and 08-118-21-11-0084).
Planner Sutter presented the proposal to the Planning Commission. The applicant would like
to build a rambler style dental building with a full basement for utility and storage. The sign is
not consistent with the 10' setback and will need to be relocated. It was also recommended
that, since the basement is required to be sprinklered, the whole building be sprinklered.
Parking requirement based on main floor area would be 17 stalls.
Greg Bichler, 5540 West Broadway addressed the Plaiming Commission. He said he's been in
the area 15 years. There would initially be only one dentist operating from the clinic, but there
could be an associate in the future. He doesn't anticipate any parking problems, there would
be only 7-8 staff members at any given time, but mentioned that staff could park on the street
or he could possibly approach the eye clinic across the street to see if they could use their
parking lot if necessary.
Commissioner Kamp expressed concerns about the basement not being counted for parking
demand, and that there might be insufficient parking if the business expanded or if the property
changed hands and the basement would no longer be used for storage. It was discussed that
because there would be no elevator, the basement could not be used for patients because of the
lack of handicapped accessibility. Planner Sutter mentioned that two extra parking stalls could
be added, but to do so there would be a loss of green space. The two additional stalls
2
corresponds with the number of stalls required for the basement storage area if it were to be
counted for calculating parking demand.
Moved by Commissioner Krueger and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to recommend to the
City Council to adopt Application 2000-12.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Greg A.
Bichler (applicant and owner), to construct a 3,498 sq. ft. dental office building on property
located at 5231 and 5237 Douglas Drive North (P.I.D. 08-118-21-11-0003 and 08-118-21-11-
0084 subject to the following conditions:
u The basement shall be used only for storage and utility purposes, and shall not be used in
any way which would act to increase the demand for off-street parking, unless the
necessary additional off-street parking is provided. The applicant and the City Council are
advised that an additional two stalls could be placed on the site if the parking lot was
enlarged.
ZI The sidewalk shall be extended east approximately 10 feet so that it connects with the
existing public sidewalk along Douglas Drive.
L3 All signage shall be in compliance with Crystal City Code.
u All lighting shall be in compliance with Crystal City Code.
All landscaping species shall be subject to review by the City's Forestry Technician prior to
installation.
No building permit shall be issued until the applicant executes the required Site
Improvement Agreement.
Commissioner Nystrom stated that although she supported this project, she disagreed strongly
with the possibility of converting green space for parking.
Commissioner Kamp stated he also supported the project, but was disappointed about the
parking issue and felt storage space ought to be considered when looking at parking
requirements in the future.
Moved by Commissioner Krueger and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by C'ommisslaner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to recon unend to the
City Council to adopt Application 2000-12.3 for Site Plan Review, submitted by Greg A.
3
Bichler (applicant and owner), to construct a 3,498 sq. ft. dental office building on property
located at 5231 and 5237 Douglas Drive North (P.I.D. 08-118-21-11-0003 and 08-118-21-11-
0084).
The findings of fact are as delineated in the staff report.
Motion carried.
5. Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider Application 2000-13.1,3,8 for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, Site Plan
Review and Preliminary Plat, submitted by SVK Development (applicant and owner), for a
residential development consisting of 10 single family detached units and 40 townhouse units,
proposed for a 10 acre site located at the northwest corner of 47I" Avenue North and Zane
Avenue North (P.I.D. 09-118-21-32-0031).
Planner Sutter stated that the property is currently zoned R1- Single Family Residential. This
would be appropriate for the ten single-family units, all they would need is a preliminary plat,
but the area for the forty townhouses needs to be rezoned P.U.D. For single family properties,
the city doesn't have much control, but the city will have much more control with the P.U.D.
The layout for the townhouses is basically the same as was presented at the neighborhood
meeting on June 12th, and there would be two public streets, Adair Avenue North and Adair
Court North servicing them. Snow plowing of the two public streets would be handled by the
townhouse association. Because these art- public streets, they would be subject to the same
laws as all other public streets and there would be no parking allowed between 3 — 6 a.m.
There would be a pedestrian trail running along the back of the property and up the west side to
the cul-de-sac on Adair Court. The City would then be responsible for connecting the trail to
the Community Center and pool and for maintenance of the trail.
Scott Kevitt, developer of the project, appeared before the Planning Commission. He
addressed several of the Planning Commission's questions, stating that each townhouse owner
would own their individual unit, and all common areas would be owned equally. The single-
family homes will definitely not be part of the association. The average base price would be
about $170,000, but past experience has shown most buyers finish the lower level right away,
which would bring the price up to $200,000-. The association would be run by SVK until the
majority of the homeowners move in, then would be relinquished to them. The approximate
cost of the association fees would be $117-$120 per month.
Virginia Cash, 4544 Adair Ave. N., spoke to the Planning Commission about her traffic
concerns if this project goes through, and ,uggested a speed hump might be needed. Planner
Sutter said he didn't think traffic would be a problem, but if it is, residents can bring their
concerns to the City Engineer and a speed hump may be looked at in the future. The Planning
Commission suggested that a 4 -way stop sign be looked at, and also directed staff to mention
to the City Engineer that this was brought up.
No residents appeared in opposition.
4
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to recommend to the
City Council to adopt Application 2000-13.1,3.8 for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development,
Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plat, submitted by SVK Development (applicant and owner),
for a residential development consisting of 10 single family detached units and 40 townhouse
units, proposed for a 10 acre site located at the northwest corner of 47th Avenue North and
Zane Avenue North (P.LD. 09-118-21 32-0031)
The findings of facts are as follows: The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The development will not negatively impact the adjacent neighborhood and provides housing
options to people in need of move -up housing and/ people interested in one -level living. The
installation of trail connections to the City owned property on the west side of the development
will enhance pedestrian and bicycle access from the development and the surrounding
neighborhood to the Community Center, Municipal Pool and Little League ball fields. The
proposal meets the PUD District purpose, use, and development standards as set out in City
Code 515.52 Subds. 1, 2, and 3. It will also provide an opportunity for construction of new
housing of a type which is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment
goals.
Motion carried 7 to 1 with Elsen, K.
Graham, Kamp, Koss, Magnuson,
Nystrom and VonRueden voting aye and
Krueger voting nay.
6hlformal Discussion and Announcements.
Planner Sutter stated that at this time no Planning Commission items have been received for
the regularly scheduled September 11th meeting.
7. Moved by Commissioner Krueger and secnnded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
- �111-1 '�:
Secretary Nysiro'
Motion carried.
wI
September 11, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Plamling Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the
following present: Elsen, T. Graham, Kamp, Magnuson, Nystrom, and VonRueden. Also
present were the following: Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen.
Absent (excused) were K. Graham and Koss. Staff did not hear from Krueger.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to approve the
minutes of the August 14, 2000 regular meeting with no exceptions.
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson declared this was the time and place as advertised for a public hearing to
consider Application 2000-14.8 for Lot Combination and Redivision, submitted by
Economic Development Authority of the City of Crystal (applicant and owner) and the
City of Crystal (owner), to move the common lot line 35 feet north of its present location
for previously divided property located at 6403 41St Avenue North (P.I.D. 17-118-21 14
0013).
Planner Sutter stated to the Planning Commission that the EDA had repurchased this lot
from the builder and due to discussions among the members of the Hagemeister Park task
force, the City Council would like to move the cornnion lot line between the parcels 35
feet north so it would line up with the rear lot lines of neighboring properties.
No one was heard.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Elsen to recommend to
the City Council to approve Application 2000-14.8 for Lot Combination and Redivision,
submitted by Economic Development Authority of the City of Crystal (applicant and
owner) and the City of Crystal (owner), to move the common lot line 35 feet north of its
present location for previously divided property located at 6403 41s' Avenue North
(P.I.D. 17-118-21 14 0013).
Motion carried.
3. Discussion Item: Development Code Revisions.
This discussion was rescheduled for October 9"' at 6:00 p.m. prior to the regularly
scheduled Planning Commission meeting. The City will provide sandwiches beginning
4
at 5:30 p.m. Planning Commission members will be called and asked to RSVP to
determine how much food to order.
Information Discussion and Announcements.
Planner Sutter mentioned that Welcome Furniture could make an application for a Site
Plan Review for consideration at the October 9t" meeting.
Some members of the Plaiming Commission were concerned about how the Code
Compliance inspections were working. They would like to see the standards used and an
update on how effective these inspections are. Planner Sutter said he would follow up on
it, but specific concerns should be directed to the inspector's supervisor, Community
Development Director Peters.
Moved by Commissioner Kamp and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
-.1
Sec tary Nystioq
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson'
October 9, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSESSION MINUTES
The worksession meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 6:00 p.m. with
the following present: Elsen, K. Graham, T. Graham, Kamp, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom,
and VonRueden. Also present were the following: Community Development Director
Peters, Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) was Koss.
Discuss Development of Code Revisions.
Community Development Director Peters spoke to the Planning Commission, stating
that Crystal has a new Comp Plan and wanted feedback from the Planning
Commission about what direction they would like staff to take. With the new
development at 47t" and Zane, Crystal is completely built out and he felt 90% of
future projects would be redevelopment. He stated he would like to focus on how to
accommodate mixed use developments, especially in the areas of Bass Lake Road
and West Broadway, 42nd Avenue, and the Highway 81 corridor. He also mentioned
a new staff member would be hired to start in January 2001. Responsibilities will
include code enforcement and neighborhood groups.
The issues brought up were:
u Environmental issues
U Signs
A The "ugliness" of our older commercial strips
Connect parks and open spaces together with paths
Lil Incorporate bus facilities (shelters and pull-outs) into redevelopment plans
U Improve landscaping in commercial areas (existing, older parking lots
especially need improvement)
Flexibility — giving applicants something (such as a PUD) for something that
the city wants
J Raise square foot lot area and parking requirements for senior housing so that
they match the requirements applied to housing for the general population
Blur some segregated areas such as commercial with residential etc.
❑ Concerns about apartments being concentrated on the south side of the city
.- .
Redevelop areas for mixed-use development (retail/office/residential) where
appropriate, problems and benefits of such a development
Improve follow-up (enforcement of site plan and zoning requirements after
approval)
❑ Exterior building materials
❑ Making zoning ordinances more user friendly
Community Development Director Peters would like to discuss modifications to
commercial, industrial and residential zoning districts along with permanent and
conditional uses at a future meeting.
The next worksession will be on Monday, November 13`x' at 6:00 p.m. Food will
again be provided at 5:30 p.m. The regular Planning Commission meeting will
follow at 7:00 p.m.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m.
Segretary Nysti '
Motion carried.
A /04/
Chair Magnuson
October 9, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Plamling Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the
following present: Elsen, K. Graham, T. Graham, Kamp, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom,
and VonRueden. Also present were the following: Planner Sutter, and Recording
Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) was Koss.
I. Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner Kamp to
approve the minutes of the September 11, 2000 regular meeting, with no
exceptions.
Motion carried.
2. Discussion Item: Proposed auto body and used car sales operation at 5160 West
Broadway (presently Automotive Concepts).
Plaimer Sutter said that the proposed use is permitted on that site, and if approved
Brookdale Dodge would remove the storage racks currently there. There would
be a limited area of inoperable vehicles stored in a screened -in area.
Perry Watson spoke for Brookdale Dodge. Because of city restrictions, there are
limited places they can go. He said they can't do anything with a vehicle until the
insurance adjuster sees it, so there would be a period of time when there would be
up to 10 — 12 vehicles "in transition". These inoperable vehicles would be stored
on the northeast side of the building in a screened -in area until they could be
repaired. There would be no mechanical repair done at this site, they are planning
on this being primarily a body shop, but are exploring the option of used car sales.
He also stated that if there wasn't sufficient room for loading and unloading
vehicles, they could be dropped at Brookdale Dodge and brought over.
Members of the Planning Commission had several concerns about this issue.
Those mentioned were whether there would be sufficient parking if there were
used cars being sold at the site, inoperable cars being parked outside the building,
and lack of green space. It was also brought up that some members felt a
precedent had been set by not allowing other auto -related businesses in the area to
keep cars outside.
Plamier Sutter stated that the ordinance doesn't require that the inoperable cars be
stored indoors, they only need to be screened. He also said that the landscaping
that is there today is what was approved by the Planning Commission a couple
years ago.
Staff was directed to research past actions for Crystal Collision, Duke's and
Collision Masters to see if the city required that they store inoperable vehicles
inside.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner T. Graham to
set a public hearing on this issue for Monday, November 13t"
Motion carried.
Informal Discussion and Announcements.
There was no discussion or announcements.
4. Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to
adjourn.
Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Chair Magnuson
M r
�eciet ry Nystrom
I
November 13, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the
following present: Elsen, K. Graham, T. Graham, Krueger, Magnuson, Nystrom, and
VonRueden. Also present were the following: Community Development Director Peters,
Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) was Kamp, staff never
heard from Koss.
1. Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to approve the minutes
of the October 9, 2000 work session and regular meeting, with no exceptions.
Motion carried.
2. Public Hearing: Application 2000-15.3 for Site Plan Review to construct additions with a gross
floor area of 3,096 sq. ft. to an existing bu::ding with a gross floor area of 4,792 sq. ft., on
Metropolitan Airports Commission property located at 5930 Lakeland Avenue North (P.I.D. 05-
118-21-14-0001).
Planner Sutter stated that the applicant had submitted application for Site Plan Review but it was
not complete. The applicant said that they would have the necessary items in so staff went ahead
and mailed notice of the public hearing, but the applicant failed to do so.
No one was heard.
Moved by Commissioner Nystrom and seconded by Commissioner Von Rueden to continue the
public hearing to the December 11"' meeting.
Motion carried.
Public Hearing: Application 2000-16.4 for Conditional Use Permit to allow motor vehicle sales
and limited outdoor storage of inoperable vehicles on property located at 5160 West Broadway
(P.I.D. 09-118-21-24-0023) in the I-2 Heavy Industrial District.
Planner Sutter said that currently this property is used for autobody work, which is a permitted
use on this site. Owner would like to expand that to include outdoor storage of inoperable
vehicles (maximum of 12) and used car sales (maximum of 30 vehicles). He also mentioned that
the applicant had received a copy of the recommended conditions.
Perry Watson, Brookdale Dodge, 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard, said that he bought this property for
the purpose of the using it as a body shop. He is landlocked at his other location and thought this
would be a good opportunity to expand and maximize the use of the additional space he has. The
inoperable vehicles would only be stored outdoors temporarily until the insurance inspector had
viewed the vehicle and determined a course of action. Abandoned vehicles would be towed off
the lot.
John Neznick of Crystal Collision was concerned about his property values going down if this
goes through. He also said he didn't feel that the current owner should be punished for the
actions of the prior owner, and doesn't think government should be able to pick and choose
which businesses are allowed where. He stated he didn't like this proposal and felt the
commission should say no to the CUP, there would be too many body shops in that area if
approved. He was also concerned about the inoperable vehicles causing a higher level of crime.
Perry Watson spoke again, said that the prior owner was a bailment operator with massive
shipments going to the property. He is willing to comply with the requested requirements and
said any city official can stop by to see what he's done so far. After being there two weeks, lie
said he's painted and had the junk cleaned up.
The Planning Commission members were concerned that if they granted the CUP and the
property was sold, a future owner might not be as diligent about maintaining the property and
following the conditions set. They questioned if they could put in a condition saying the CUP
would be reviewed in a year with possible revocation for non-compliance, or possibly limit the
CUP to Brookdale Dodge.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried.
Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner VonRueden to recommend
to the City Council to approve Application 2000-16.4 for Conditional Use Permit to allow motor
vehicle sales and limited outdoor storage of inoperable vehicles on property located at 5160 West
Broadway (P.I.D. 09-118-21-24-0023) in the 1-2 Heavy Industrial District.
The findings of fact are as listed in the staff memo and applicant must meet all conditions listed
below. In addition, the CUP for auto sales is granted as an accessory use attached to Brookdale
Dodge's use of the property as a body shop.
Outdoor storage shall be prohibited except for inoperable motor vehicles not to exceed 12
such vehicles and limited to the area designated on the parking plan. The outdoor storage
racks shall be removed from the site. For the purposes of this Conditional use Permit,
"inoperable motor vehicle" means any motor vehicle that, through reason of either
mechanical problems or noncompliance with applicable State laws and local ordinances,
cannot be operated on public streets or roads.
The number of motor vehicles for sale shall not exceed 30 and the parking of said vehicles
shall be limited to the designated area shown on the parking plan.
3. The trash enclosure shall be kept closed except when loading or unloading, and no refuse or
recyclables may be stored outside the enclosure, as required by Crystal City Code.
The areas shown to be landscaped on the 1998 (Automotive Concepts) site plan shall be
maintained as shown on the plan, except for the one island with the trash enclosure which
may have an alternate covering of landscaping rock. The other island immediately west of
2
the loading dock shall be landscaped and maintained as shown on the 1998 site plan.
5. Vehicles shall not park, stop, load or unload in traffic lanes on West Broadway or other
public roadway. Vehicles shall not park, stop, load or unload on the sidewalks and
boulevards along West Broadway or on the site's landscaped areas. The owner shall be
responsible for informing delivery drivers and companies of this requirement.
6. Tractor -trailers shall not be allowed on site because there does not appear to be sufficient
room for them to urn around on site. If tile applicant wishes to have tractor-trailens matc1I10
deliveries to the site, a revised parking plan showing that tractor -trailers will have sufficient
room to turn around on site must be submitted to City staff for review.
7. All parking shall be accommodated off street and shall be consistent with the parking plan
provided by the applicant, except that the areas identified by staff as not providing the
required 24' drive aisles shall be reconfigured to do so. The parking areas shall be designated
and re -striped as shown on the parking plan. This includes relocating the screening fence /
gate approximately 70 feet east of its present location.
8. All motor vehicles must be parked on grade; none shall be elevated on jacks, platforms or
similar equipment. This includes any motor vehicles for sale or display.
9. The length of any vehicle parked on site shall be less than 32 feet, and in no circumstances
shall any vehicle be parked in a way which blocks drive aisles or other parking spaces.
10. If the applicant later wishes to install new lighting that might shine on or near West
Broadway, staff will require that photometrics be submitted so that it can ensure that the
lighting will be consistent with City Code.
11. If the applicant later wishes to install fencing on the site in addition to that approved in the
1998 site plan, no such fencing may be installed without Planning Commission review and
City Council approval.
12. All signage shall be in compliance with City Code.
13. That auto sales and limited outdoor storage be allowed as conditional uses only if they are
accessory to the use of the property by Brookdale Dodge as a body shop.
Motion carried 6 - 1, Elsen, K. Graham, T.
Graham, Krueger, Magnuson and
VonRueden voting aye and Nystrom voting
nay.
4. Review of proposed grading modifications at Parkside Acres.
Planner Sutter stated originally the plan was for high and broad berms, but after seeing the
market, the developer would like to make the properties that were originally going to have
regular basements into lookouts instead. Landscaping would basically remain the same and a
3
retaining wall will be built. City staff and the City Engineer have reviewed the plan and found
no problem with it. Neighbors have been notified of the proposed change.
Ross Larson, Landform Engineering, said that the retaining wall would be 2' - 4' high, and he
felt it would be nicer than the original plan. When questioned by the Planning Commissioner, he
said that the low area would not hold water, it is designed to drain.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner K. Graham to recommend to
the City Council to approve the grading and landscaping changes proposed by the developer of
Parkside Acres for the six units at the southwest portion of the site.
Motion carried.
5. Discussion Item: Redevelopment of 5232, 5240, 5248 and 5256 West Broadway for Dumark
Auto Sales, Goodyear Auto Service and Maaco Auto Painting.
Planner Sutter said that this is currently four properties that if approved would be re -platted into
two, one 90' and one 209', with a two -unit building for Goodyear and Maaco. This proposal
would exceed parking requirements on the lot and there would be a fenced enclosed area for
vehicles. Some requirements would be the re -platting of the rear of the property as an alley, a 10'
sign setback would be required, and the overhead door facing the alley would need to be pulled
in 20' off the property line. Dumark's present building and the older house located on the site
would be demolished.
Tom Anderson, Dumarks said that the properties would be owned by DuMark's and leased to
Goodyear and Maaco. He also mentioned that they would eliminate the overhead door facing the
alley.
The Planning Commission had several concerns, and questioned whether two uses on one
property was allowed. Community Development Director Peters stated he had found the
ordinance questioned, and except in PUD, not more than one principal building can be located on
a lot; multiple uses within a single building are allowed. There was also concern about
difficulties entering and exiting the property if curb cuts were left as is, and the Planning
Commission questioned whether these would be changed. Planner Sutter said it was up to
Hennepin County to decide that. Currently there are four curb cuts on the sites.
6. Discussion Item: Vacant former Ember's property at 5756 Lakeland Avenue North.
Planner Sutter stated he has had no further written contact with the people interested in this
property, but has spoke with their attorney and recommended they attend the Planning
Commission meeting to find out the Planning Commission's thoughts on their proposal. The
property is deteriorated, parking lot needs to be sealcoated at the very least, and because it's
zoned B-4 it would need to be re -zoned. The 81 corridor is a main entry point into the city and
suggested the Planning Commission consider what they would like to see there for possible
future development because he will continue getting such requests.
Community Development Director Peters mentioned the Northwest Corridor Partnership, and
said Mike Opat had gotten funding and hired a consulting group to help organize all cities and
4
8
determine how best to enhance that area. A possible fixture use may be a dedicated transit way.
This issue will be looked at comprehensively, a developer panel is giving their input also.
Informal Discussion and Amlouncements.
December's I l"'s meeting will have the continuation of the public hearing for Helicopter Flight,
a possible discussion item for the church at 32°d and Douglas, and there will be another
worksession that night.
Nafstad and Hagemeister are undergoing master planning, Hagemeister should be completed by
January and Nafstad by May or June.
Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Krueger to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 8:43 p.m.
�1
{
Secr'e ry Nyst om
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson
December 11, 2000
CRYSTAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Crystal Planning Commission convened at 7:00 p.m. with the following
present: Elsen, T. Graham, Kamp, Magnuson, Nystrom, and VonRueden. Also present were the
following: Planner Sutter, and Recording Secretary Van Krevelen. Absent (excused) were K. Graham,
Koss, and Krueger.
1. Moved by Commissioner Elsen and seconded by Commissioner Nystrom to approve the minutes of the
November 13, 2000 work session and regular meeting, with no exceptions.
Motion carried.
2. Public Hearing (continued from November 13`x' meeting): Application 2000-15.3 for Site Plan Review to
construct additions with a gross floor area of 3,096 sq. ft. to an existing building with a gross floor area
of 4,792 sq. ft., on Metropolitan Airports Commission property located at 5930 Lakeland Avenue North
(P.I.D. 05-118-21-14-0001).
Planner Sutter stated that this Public Hearing had been continued at the November 13, 2000, Planning
Commission meeting until the December 11, 2000 meeting. The City has 60 days to take action on
public hearings, but because the applicants never followed through with the completed application, the
city was recommending denial. City staff feels that the 60 -day limit applies, even though they did not
have a completed application, because the applicant assured the city that they would have all necessary
documentation completed and staff mailed out the notice of public hearing based on that information.
No one was heard.
Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner VonRueden to recommend to the
City Council to deny Application 2000-15.3 for Site Plan Review to construct additions with a gross
floor area of 3,096 sq. ft. to an existing building with a gross floor area of 4,792 sq. ft., on Metropolitan
Airports Commission property located at 5930 Lakeland Avenue North (P.LD. 05-118-21-14-0001).
The findings of fact for denial is that the applicant has not submitted the following items which are
necessary for the Planning Commission to evaluate the application:
❑ A written statement from the Crystal Airport manager or other appropriate Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC) official stating that they authorize the submittal of this application. (The reason
for this requirement is that we cannot consider an application for Site Plan Review without the
property owner's authorization, and in this case MAC owns the property.)
A copy of the MAC lease currently in effect.
Q A Certificate of Survey or some similar documentation from a Registered Land Surveyor to verify
that the property line along the County Road 81 right-of-way has been found and showing the
distances from the property line to the two buildings as measured in the field.
❑ A new site plan showing the following revisions:
9 The driveway approach being narrowed to a maximum width of 24'_
• The hard surfaced parking area between the building and Lakeland Avenue as having a perimeter
of concrete curb & gutter (min. b6-12).
• Parking stalls that are at least 9' wide and 18' deep for 90 degree stalls or 8.5' vide and 23' long for
parallel stalls; driving aisles that are at least 24' wide; backing space for any parking stalls located
next to buildings or fences; and a setback of at least 5' from the parking lot to the property line
along County Road 81.
• The distance from the property line along County Road 81 to the nearest corners of each of the two
buildings. The location of the property line and the distances from it to the adjacent buildings will
need to be determined by a surveyor in the field.
Motion carried.
Discussion Item: Potential request from Maranatha StoreHouse for rezoning from I-1 to B-4, a
Conditional Use Permit to add a drive -up coffee shop, and a Variance from parking requirements at 5101
Lakeland Avenue North.
Planner Sutter said he was looking for feedback from the Planning Commission to relay back to
Maranatha, so they could decide whether or not they wanted to go forward with formal applications.
There are a number of problems, parking being the main issue.
Several Planning Commission members stated they did not feel this was an appropriate use for this site,
and thought the additional traffic would make an already bad traffic situation worse.
Also discussed was whether their current use of the property was legal. Planner Sutter stated that since
we've already issued sign permits, the city probably could not go back and say they can't use the site for
that purpose, but can limit it to current usage and not allow additional expansion. There may also be
some long-term redevelopment plans for this area.
Informal Discussion and Announcements.
Nothing on the agenda for January yet, Maaco/Dumarks may come in. There will be a worksession prior
to the meeting.
Moved by Commissioner T. Graham and seconded by Commissioner Kamp to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 7:26 p.m.
Secr tary Nystrom
Motion carried.
Chair Magnuson