Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2011.09.20 Council Meeting Packet
CITY OF CRYSTAL City Council Meeting Packet for Tuesday, September 20, 2011 MEETING SCHEDULE Time Type of Meeting Place 6:00 – 6:30 p.m. Citizen Input Time with Mayor Bowman Conference Room A 6:30 – 6:45 p.m. EDA Work Session Conference Room A 6:50 – 7:00 p.m. EDA Special Meeting Conference Room A 7:00 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting Council Chambers Immediately after the Regular City Council Meeting Council Work Session agenda: · Discuss changes to Comprehensive Plan required by Metropolitan Council and timeline for considering same. · West Metro Fire Board update and report. Conference Room A THE CITY MANAGER’S COMMENTS ARE BOLDED . Crystal City Council Meeting Preliminary Agenda September 20, 2011 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. PROCLAMATION The Mayor proclaimed Monday, September 26 as Family Day – a day to eat dinner with your family in the City of Crystal. III. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES The Council will consider the minutes from the following meetings in a single motion: a. The Regular City Council Meeting from September 6, 2011; and b. The Council Work Session from September 6, 2011. c. The Council Work Session from September 8, 2011. IV. CONSENT AGENDA The Council will consider the following items, which are routine and non-controversial in nature, in a single motion: 1. Approval of the list of license applications submitted by the City Clerk to the City Council, a list that is on file in the office of the City Clerk; 2. Approval of disbursements over $25,000 submitted by the Finance Director to the City Council, a list that is on file in the office of the Finance Director; 3. Acceptance of John Schuneman’s resignation from the Parks and Recreation Commission. V. PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Bowman will open a public hearing to receive public comment and Council consideration of a resolution adopting the Assessment Roll for the 2011 Alley and Driveway Construction Project No. 2011-07. This year’s alley and driveway project is complete and the public hearing on the proposed assessments is scheduled for September 20. After taking public comment, recommend approval of the resolution adopting the assessment roll for this project. Crystal City Council Meeting Agenda September 20, 2011 Page 2 of 5 VI. OPEN FORUM (Open forum is a time for individuals in the audience to address the Council on subjects not on the regular Council agenda. Individuals are asked to step up to the podium and speak clearly into the microphone. You are allowed 3 minutes to make your comments. The Council will not take action on items discussed during open forum; however, the Council may add the item to a future meeting agenda and ask city staff for follow-up.) VII. REGULAR AGENDA 1. The Council will consider approval of the appointment to the Parks and Recreation Commission for Nancy LaRoche for a term expiring December 31, 2012. The Interview Committee recommends approval of the appointment of Ms. LaRoche to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Ms. LaRoche plans to attend the September 20 Council meeting. 2. The Council will consider a new commercial kennel license for property located at 3035 Hampshire Ave North submitted by Emily Pollnow dba Happy Hounds. The applicant is applying for a commercial kennel license to provide temporary foster care for dogs. The Animal Control Officer reviewed the license application and inspected the property. The proposed commercial kennel license does meet the requirements for a home occupation. Once the Council has heard any comments from neighbors, recommend approval of the commercial kennel license, provided the operation meets the requirements for home occupations. 3. The Council will consider a conditional use permit for motor vehicle sales at 5301 Douglas Drive North. The current owner of the car wash at 5301 Douglas is seeking a conditional use permit to use the former detail shop space and northern portion of the property for a motor vehicle sales business. The car wash would continue to operate on the southern half of the property. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application on September 12 and unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use permit application with the conditions outlined in the staff report plus an additional requirement that the car wash institute a “no car stereos” policy and signage. 4. The Council will consider a zoning ordinance text amendment or rezoning pertaining to hours of operation limitations at 3537 Douglas Drive North. The applicant is seeking a text amendment to allow for extended hours for a restaurant in one of the tenant spaces in the shopping center. In that same shopping center, the Council earlier this year denied a variance to the hours Crystal City Council Meeting Agenda September 20, 2011 Page 3 of 5 and directed staff to suspend enforcement of the hours of operation to allow for review and possible rewriting of the section of the zoning ordinance relating to hours of operation in this zoning district. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application on September 12 and unanimously recommended approval of an option creating a conditional use permit process to relax the hours of operation requirements in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district. 5. The Council will consider a resolution accepting Feasibility Report and ordering a public hearing on Project #2011-12, Forest North Street Reconstruction project. Phase 12, Forest North Neighborhood, is the next phase of the street reconstruction project and was discussed at the last work session. In order to keep the project on schedule, the Council needs to accept the feasibility report and order a public hearing on the proposed project for October 18. Recommend approval of the resolution. 6. The Council will consider a resolution adopting the 2012 Fee Schedule (Main Section), amending City Code Appendix IV. During the budget work sessions, proposed changes to the fee schedule were reviewed. Recommend approval of the 2012 fee schedule. 7. The Council will consider a resolution adopting the 2012 Fee Schedule (Utilities Section), amending City Code Appendix IV. During the utilities budget discussion, the utilities fee schedule was reviewed. Recommend approval of the 2012 fee schedule for utilities. 8. The Council will consider the second reading of an ordinance amending Section 211.01 of the Crystal City Code regarding mayor and council salaries. At its September 6 meeting, the Council approved the first reading of an ordinance reducing the 2012 Mayor and Council salaries to a 1% increase. Recommend approval of the second reading of this ordinance. 9. The Council will consider the first reading of an ordinance amending Appendix IV of the City Code regarding election filing fees. During its review of several Charter provisions last year, the Charter Commission recommended adding a provision authorizing the Council to change the election filing fees for mayor and councilmembers. Recommend approval of the first reading of an ordinance increasing the filing fee for mayor and councilmember to $25. Crystal City Council Meeting Agenda September 20, 2011 Page 4 of 5 10. The Council will consider a resolution of support for the Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master plan. The Council has discussed the proposed Bassett Creek Regional Trail and corridor alignments at various work sessions over the last couple of years. Three Rivers is requesting Crystal’s support of this regional trail. Recommend approval of the resolution. 11. The Council will consider quotes and resolution awarding the contract for Project #2011-17, Sumter Avenue Watermain Replacement project. There are funds in the 2011 Utilities capital budget for replacement of this watermain. Quotes are due from contractors on September 19. In order to complete the work this year, the quotes received and recommendation will be presented at the September 20 meeting. 12. The Council will consider a resolution certifying the amount to be assessed, ordering the preparation of the assessment roll, and ordering the public hearing on assessments for Project #2010-11, Broadway Park Driveways and Sewer Service Repair project. As with other street reconstruction phases, residents of this year’s project have the opportunity to install new driveways and have sewer services repaired. The work has been completed and it is necessary to schedule a public hearing on the proposed assessments for the work for October 18. Recommend approval of the resolution. 13. The Council will consider quotes and resolution awarding contract for Project #2010-14, CIPP Sewer Lining Project Part 3. There are funds in this year’s Utilities Capital budget for sewer lining. Several phases of work have already been done this year. Quotes were received in late August for additional work needed in the Forest North neighborhood. There are sufficient funds to complete this additional work; recommend approval of the resolution. VIII. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION · The next Crystal Business Association meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 21 at Wells Fargo, 7000 Bass Lake Road, from 8:30 – 9:30 a.m. · The next City Council Meeting will be at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 4, in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Crystal City Council Meeting Agenda September 20, 2011 Page 5 of 5 IX. ADJOURNMENT X. MEETING SCHEDULE ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Have a great weekend; see you Tuesday night! Time Type of Meeting Place 6:00 – 6:30 p.m. Citizen Input Time with Mayor Bowman Conference Room A 6:30 – 6:45 p.m. EDA Work Session Conference Room A 6:50 – 7:00 p.m. EDA Special Meeting Conference Room A 7:00 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting Council Chambers Immediately after the Regular City Council Meeting Council Work Session agenda: · Discuss changes to Comprehensive Plan required by Metropolitan Council and timeline for considering same. · West Metro Fire Board update and report. Conference Room A REGULAR AGENDA Report on Feasibility 2012 - Phase 12 Forest North Street Reconstruction Crystal, Minnesota City Project No. 2011-12 SEH No. CRYST 117030 September 15, 2011 Distribution List No. of Copies Sent to 7 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55422-1609 6 Thomas Mathisen, City Engineer City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55422-1609 1 Anne Norris, City Manager City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55422-1609 Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 ES-1 Executive Summary Conclusions Based on parameters and guidelines set forth in the Overall Study for Crystal’s Local Street Reconstruction Program dated March 10, 2003 (Overall Study), the Update to the 2003 Overall Study for Crystal Local Street Reconstruction Program dated May 31, 2007 (2007 Update), construction and management experiences of Phases 1 through 11, site specific geotechnical investigation, site observations of the Phase 12 area, and input received from the City Council and Phase 12 property owners, it is concluded that: 1. The streets have outlived their useful life due to age, soil conditions, traffic volume growth, and natural weathering factors. 2. The streets should be designed for a 20-year life that can be extended to 35 years with proper maintenance, which may include milling and overlaying. 3. City of New Hope (New Hope) property owners are included in the study area along the: a. North side of 49th Avenue, and b. West side of Nevada Avenue, 4. Because the existing gravel entrance only serves one driveway, 51st Place between Florida Avenue and 350 feet west of Florida Avenue is not included in the study area. 5. The improvements are necessary, cost-effective and feasible from an engineering standpoint. 6. Phase 12 streets on Crystal’s MSA system are: a. 47th Avenue between Louisiana Avenue and Douglas Drive, b. 49th Avenue (shared with New Hope), c. Fairview Avenue, and d. Louisiana Avenue between 47th and Fairview Avenues. 7. Subgrade soils are primarily sand mixed with silt east of approximately Maryland Avenue and sand mixed with clay west of approximately Maryland Avenue. 8. Concrete sidewalk exists within the project area on 47th Avenue east of the Forest School property and 49th Avenue. 9. Concrete sidewalks exist along the perimeter of the project area along: a. Douglas Drive, b. Hampshire Avenue, and c. Louisiana Avenue. 10. Numerous locations exist within the project area where the right-of-way (ROW) width is less than the City-standard 60 foot width. 11. 17% of the streets were built without any curb. Executive Summary (Continued) Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 ES-2 12. 22% of the streets were built with City standard B618 curb. Approximately 8% of the existing B618 curb was found to be in need of repair or replacement. 13. 61% of the streets were built with non-City standard “D” curb. Approximately 75% of the existing “D” curb needs repair or replacement. The remaining 25% of existing “D” curb will not outlive the proposed street improvements. 14. Six retaining walls will likely need adjustment to make room for street reconstruction activities. 15. Due to the street grading, street and sidewalk combination and steep boulevard slopes, sixteen retaining walls are proposed. 16. Up to fifty-six trees may be impacted to make room for street reconstruction activities. 17. Possible sight triangle obstructions such as trees, branches, or foliage are located at numerous locations within the project area. 18. Twelve residents report that runoff pools in their alley, rear yard or side yards. The drainage problems continue to be investigated. 19. Twenty-nine residents report that they have an operating sump pump. The high numbers reported west of Maryland Avenue are expected and are indicative of generally sandy with clay soils. 20. The storm sewer systems in the Forest North Neighborhood flow either: a. South into Memory Lane Pond, which is interconnected via storm water pipes to Brownwood, Hagermeister and Gaulke ponds, or b. Northeast into a series of detention ponds south of the Canadian Pacific Railroad adjacent to West Broadway and 51st Place. The series of detention ponds are interconnected via storm water pipes and eventually drain to Twin Lakes in the Shingle Creek Watershed District. 21. At some locations, the existing storm sewer pipe network is unable to convey runoff from the City’s standard 2-year design storm. However, combining the existing street valley gutters with the existing storm sewer pipe network generally satisfies the drainage needs of the study area. Because runoff arriving at the pipe from distant locations via valley gutters does not arrive until the pipe has already passed runoff from nearby locations. 22. The subgrade soils appear to be favorable east of Maryland Avenue to construct rain gardens. 23. There are no known deficiencies in the sanitary sewer and water main pipe networks in the project area. 24. The City plans to hire a contractor to structurally line the existing sanitary sewer trunk pipe before street reconstruction begins. 25. Any deficiencies in the water main network will be investigated and repaired prior to the start of the project. 26. Steel gas mains and services are buried under the street pavement and in the boulevards. 27. CenterPoint Energy will begin to upgrade their steel gas mains in October 2011. During street reconstruction, CenterPoint Energy will upgrade the remainder of their steel gas mains and all services in the Forest North neighborhood. Executive Summary (Continued) Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 ES-3 28. Electric, telephone, and cable TV lines in the study area are all overhead or buried mostly outside of the street pavement area. 29. Staffs at the Cities of Crystal and New Hope continue to develop a schedule of Public Improvement Hearings and neighborhood meetings that will facilitate the needs of the two Cities residents and Phase 12 as a whole. Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. Local streets in the study area be reconstructed as proposed in this report on feasibility. 2. The report be reviewed by the City Council, staff, and financial advisors. 3. The City of Crystal review the report findings with the City of New Hope and coordinate funding agreements for the reconstruction of: a. 49th Avenue, b. Louisiana Avenue north of Fairview Avenue, and c. Nevada Avenue. 4. The Crystal and New Hope shared 49th Avenue is proposed at 37 feet wide consisting of two 12-foot traffic lanes, a 5-foot striped buffer zone on one side, and an 8-foot striped parking lane. The street crown is proposed to be located at the lane line between traffic lanes. The centerline of the street will be constructed at the center of the existing street. The parking lane is proposed along the north side of the street. 5. 47th, Fairview and Louisiana Avenues MSA streets are proposed at 32 feet wide consisting of two 11-foot traffic lanes, a 2-foot reaction area on one side, and an 8-foot parking lane striped on the opposite side. The street crown is proposed to be located at the lane line between traffic lanes. 6. Along MSA street 47th Avenue west of Hampshire Avenue, the centerline of the street and sidewalk combination be constructed at or near the center of the ROW. East of Hampshire Avenue, it is recommended that the centerline of the street be constructed at or near the center of the ROW. The parking lane is proposed along the north side of the street. 7. The Fairview Avenue street and sidewalk combination be constructed 1-foot north of the existing utility poles that occupy Fairview Avenues south boulevard. The parking lane is proposed along the north side of the street. 8. Along MSA street Louisiana Avenue, the centerline of the street and sidewalk combination be constructed at or near the center of the ROW. The parking lane is proposed along the east side of the street. 9. The 47th and Louisiana Avenues MSA streets have a pavement section that will consist of excavation and replacement with 12 inches of class 5 aggregate base, 4 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing and B618 concrete curb and gutter. Executive Summary (Continued) Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 ES-4 10. The Crystal and New Hope shared 49th Avenue have a pavement section that will consist of excavation and replacement with 12 inches of select granular borrow, 10 inches of class 5 aggregate base and 3 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing. 11. The Fairview Avenue MSA street have a pavement section that will consist of excavation and replacement with 8 inches of class 5 aggregate base, 3 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing and B618 concrete curb and gutter. 12. A subgrade correction be placed due to unsuitable soils on: a. 49th Avenue west of Maryland Avenue – 30 inches, and b. Fairview Avenue east of Florida Avenue – 12 inches. 13. Meetings with residents be held to discuss sidewalk locations, pavement width, parking/no parking, and striping details for MSA streets 47th, 49th, Fairview, and Louisiana Avenues. 14. The final sidewalk locations along MSA streets will be discussed at neighborhood meetings later this fall during the preparation of bid documents. 15. The local non MSA streets are proposed at 30 feet wide consisting of two 13-foot traffic lanes and a 2- foot reaction area. The street crown is proposed at the line between the traffic lanes. Construction will be on or near the center of the right-of-way. Exceptions to the 30 feet wide local non MSA streets are: a. Jersey Avenue between Corvallis Avenue and 150 feet north of 50th Avenue – 27 feet, and b. Hampshire Avenue north of 51st Place – 27 feet. 16. The Crystal local non MSA streets with above average school bus traffic have a pavement section that will consist of 12 inches of class 5 aggregate base, 4 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing and B618 concrete curb and gutter. Those streets are: a. 48th Avenue between Louisiana and Hampshire Avenues b. Hampshire Avenue between 47th and 48th Avenues 17. Full-depth reclaimed aggregate base construction be used along local non MSA streets with average or below average school bus traffic. 18. The Crystal and New Hope shared local non MSA street, the reclaimed gravel base be placed to a thickness of 8 inches and covered with 3.5 inches of bituminous surfacing. 19. On the remaining Crystal local non MSA streets the reclaimed aggregate base be placed to a thickness of 6 inches and covered with 3 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing. 20. A 12-inch subgrade correction be placed due to unsuitable soils on: a. Nevada Avenue, b. 48th Avenue east of Edgewood Avenue, and c. Hampshire Avenue north of 50th Avenue. 21. A 3% street crown be used along all reconstructed streets. Executive Summary (Continued) Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 ES-5 22. Due to narrow ROW and replacement of existing storm sewer along rear or side yards, temporary construction easements or rights of entry may be necessary. 23. B618 curb be added to streets where none exists today to bring those streets up to City standards. 24. Existing B618 curb be repaired, or removed and replaced, as necessary. 25. Existing “D” curb be removed and replaced with B618 curb. 26. Due to street grading and steep boulevard grade concerns along 58th Place, construct modular block walls at: a. 6425 and 6501 47th Avenues, b. 6425, 6500 and 6505 Corvallis Avenues, c. 6504, 6520, 6526, 6600 and 6602 Fairview Avenues, d. 5102, 5108 and 5109 Florida Avenues, and e. 4939, 4957 and 5001 Jersey Avenue. 27. Meetings with site specific residents be held to explain the impact street reconstruction activities might have on their boulevard retaining walls, trees, and landscaping. 28. Before removing a tree, attempt to either adjust the alignment of the proposed street and/or install the curb by hand rather than machine to avoid the removal of the tree. 29. The City consider stop control changes at numerous locations within the project area. 30. The existing storm sewer system will be replaced and expanded where practical and feasible such that it does not redirect storm water runoff to a pond, creek, or existing storm sewer pipe different from the one it ultimately arrives at today. 31. Trunk storm sewer pipe be extended or replaced on the following MSA streets to satisfy the MSA design requirement that the driving lanes be protected from flooding caused by a 3-year design storm: a. Fairview Avenue between Kentucky and Florida Avenues, and b. 48th Avenue between Louisiana and Kentucky Avenues. 32. Catch basins be replaced as necessary when widening the existing street width to the proposed street width. 33. Concrete valley gutters be installed to convey storm water runoff through intersections without catch basins to intersections with catch basins. Potential valley gutter locations may be installed at the locations of existing bituminous valley gutters. 34. The City consider constructing rain gardens east of Maryland Avenue to better manage runoff in areas with favorable topography. 35. 4-inch drain tile be installed 100 feet each direction of some of catch basins at low points in the street grade and where necessary and feasible. Executive Summary (Continued) Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 ES-6 36. Sump pump boxes connected to the proposed drain tile network be installed in the boulevards on an as needed basis where practical and feasible to as many residents as possible that reported owning sump pumps. 37. The program to repair sanitary sewer services and reconstruct private driveways be offered to property owners in Phase 12 as it was in Phases 1 through 11. 38. The City consider CenterPoint Energy’s request to begin reconstructing their gas main in the study area during fall 2011. 39. Reconstruction of the streets in Phase 12 proceed at an estimated total cost of $6,610,293. 40. The City assess the 10 lots whose remaining frontage was or will be reconstructed with past or future street improvements for ½ the street assessment with Phase 12 and the other ½ in conjunction with the past or future street improvements. 41. The City continues budgeting funds to finance future street maintenance costs. The project be financed with a combination of MSA funds, special assessments, the Storm Drain Utility Fund, and the application of the City’s Street Reconstruction Fund balance. The financial analysis is based upon the following: Table 1 Summary of Funding Sources Funding Source Rate/Amount Benefit Total Single Family/Duplex Property Street Assessment Rate $4,917 /Lot 497 Lots $2,443,749 “Commercial/Non-Profit” Property Street Assessment Rate $88.19 /Front Foot 4,388.16 Front Feet $386,992 Concrete Curb and Gutter Assessment · Install City Standard B618 Concrete Curb & Gutter $18.88 /Front Foot 7,679.35 Front Feet $144,986 · Remove D Curb & Replace with City Standard B618 Concrete Curb & Gutter $18.88 /Front Foot 27,523.98 Front Feet $519,653 · Reincorporate B618 Curb $4.91 /Front Foot 8,644.21 Front Feet $42,443 Total Cost to be Assessed $3,537,823 MSA Pledged Construction Funds $1,720,008 Storm Drain Utility Fund $450,000 Net Unfunded Amount $671,099 Surrounding Community Receiving Benefit $231,363 TOTAL OF FUNDING SOURCES $6,610,293 SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page i Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal Certification Page Title Page Distribution List Executive Summary Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................1 2.0 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................2 2.1 Pavement and Subgrade Soils ........................................................................... 2 2.2 Sidewalks ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Right-of Way, Easements and Alleys .................................................................. 3 2.4 Concrete Curb and Gutter ................................................................................... 4 2.4.1 No Curb ................................................................................................... 4 2.4.2 Existing B618 Curb.................................................................................. 4 2.4.3 Existing “D” Curb ..................................................................................... 5 2.5 Retaining Walls ................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Boulevard Trees and Staircases ......................................................................... 5 2.7 Sight Triangle Obstructions ................................................................................. 5 2.8 Drainage ............................................................................................................. 5 2.8.1 Surface Water Runoff .............................................................................. 5 2.8.2 Groundwater Flows ................................................................................. 6 2.9 Utilities ................................................................................................................ 7 2.9.1 Public Utilities .......................................................................................... 7 2.9.1.1 City of Crystal Utilities ............................................................. 7 2.9.1.1.1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Pipe .................................... 7 2.9.1.1.2. Sanitary Sewer Services ....................................... 7 2.9.1.1.3. Water Main ............................................................ 7 2.9.1.2 City of New Hope Utilities ....................................................... 7 2.9.1.2.1. Water Main ............................................................ 7 2.9.2 Private Utilities ........................................................................................ 7 3.0 Criteria for Investigation ...........................................................................................7 3.1 Criteria ................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Permits ................................................................................................................ 8 4.0 Proposed Improvements ...........................................................................................8 4.1 Pavements .......................................................................................................... 8 4.1.1 MSA Street Alternatives .......................................................................... 8 4.1.1.1 Width and Parking ................................................................... 8 4.1.1.1.1. 47th, Fairview and Louisiana Avenues ................... 9 4.1.1.1.2. 49th Avenue ........................................................... 9 4.1.1.2 Sidewalks ................................................................................ 9 Table of Contents (Continued) Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page ii 4.1.2 Local non MSA Street Width, Parking, and Sidewalks .......................... 11 4.1.2.1 Street width ........................................................................... 11 4.1.2.2 Parking .................................................................................. 11 4.1.2.3 Sidewalk ................................................................................ 12 4.1.3 Street and Sidewalk Pavement Sections .............................................. 12 4.1.3.1 MSA Streets .......................................................................... 12 4.1.3.1.1. 47th Avenue ......................................................... 12 4.1.3.1.2. 49th Avenue .......................................................... 12 4.1.3.1.3. Fairview Avenue .................................................. 13 4.1.3.1.4. Louisiana Avenue ................................................ 13 4.1.3.2 Local non MSA Streets ......................................................... 13 4.1.3.3 Sidewalks .............................................................................. 14 4.1.3.3.1. 47th Avenue ......................................................... 14 4.1.3.3.2. 49th and Fairview Avenues .................................. 14 4.1.3.3.3. Louisiana Avenues .............................................. 15 4.1.4 Street Crown ......................................................................................... 15 4.2 Right-of-Ways and Rights of Entry .................................................................... 15 4.3 Concrete Curb and Gutter ................................................................................. 16 4.3.1 No Curb ................................................................................................. 16 4.3.2 Existing B618 Curb................................................................................ 16 4.3.3 Existing “D” Curb ................................................................................... 16 4.4 Retaining Walls ................................................................................................. 16 4.5 Boulevard Trees and Staircases ....................................................................... 16 4.6 Private Driveway Reconstruction ...................................................................... 17 4.7 Stop Signs ......................................................................................................... 17 4.8 Drainage ........................................................................................................... 17 4.8.1 MSA Streets .......................................................................................... 17 4.8.1.1 47th Avenue ........................................................................... 17 4.8.1.2 49th Avenue ........................................................................... 17 4.8.1.3 Fairview Avenue ................................................................... 18 4.8.1.4 Louisiana Avenue ................................................................. 18 4.8.2 Local non MSA Streets.......................................................................... 18 4.8.2.1 Maintenance Issues .............................................................. 18 4.8.2.2 Concrete Valley Gutters ........................................................ 18 4.8.2.3 Area Drainage Concerns ...................................................... 18 4.9 Rain Gardens .................................................................................................... 18 4.9.1 Runoff Management .............................................................................. 18 4.9.2 Background Information ........................................................................ 18 4.9.3 Proposed Locations .............................................................................. 19 4.9.4 Maintenance .......................................................................................... 19 4.10 Drain Tile ........................................................................................................... 19 Table of Contents (Continued) Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page iii 4.11 Utilities .............................................................................................................. 20 4.11.1 Public Utilities ........................................................................................ 20 4.11.1.1 City of Crystal Utilities ........................................................... 20 4.11.1.1.1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Pipe .................................. 20 4.11.1.1.2. Sanitary Sewer Services ..................................... 20 4.11.1.1.3. Water Main .......................................................... 20 4.11.1.2 City of New Hope Utilities ..................................................... 20 4.11.1.2.1. Water Main .......................................................... 20 4.11.2 Private Utilities ...................................................................................... 21 5.0 Implementation ........................................................................................................21 5.1 Estimated Project Costs .................................................................................... 21 5.2 Preliminary Opinion of Property Benefit ............................................................ 22 5.3 Proposed Financing .......................................................................................... 22 5.4 Assessments ..................................................................................................... 23 5.4.1 Street Assessments .............................................................................. 23 5.4.2 Concrete Curb and Gutter Assessments ............................................... 25 5.4.2.1 No Curb ................................................................................. 25 5.4.2.2 Existing B618 Curb ............................................................... 25 5.4.2.3 Existing D Curb ..................................................................... 25 5.5 Future Maintenance .......................................................................................... 26 6.0 Schedule ...................................................................................................................26 6.1 Project Schedule ............................................................................................... 26 List of Tables Table 1 Summary of Funding Sources ............................................................................. ES-6 Table 2 Breakout of Total Estimated Project Cost ............................................................... 22 Table 3 Net Cost for Street Assessment .............................................................................. 23 Table 4 Cost Splits ............................................................................................................... 24 Table 5 Single Family/Duplex Street Assessment Rate ....................................................... 24 Table 6 “Commercial and Non-profit” Property Street Assessment Rate ............................ 25 Table 7 Curb and Gutter Assessment .................................................................................. 26 Table 8 Project Schedule ..................................................................................................... 27 Table of Contents (Continued) Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page iv List of Figures Figure 1 – Location Map Figure 2 – Street Summary Figure 3 – Typical Section Municipal State Aid Street Reconstruction Figure 4 – Typical Section - Local Street Reconstruction Figure 5 – Fall 2011 Gas Main Replacement Figure 6 – Curb Summary Figure 7 – Storm Sewer Figure 8 – Drain Tile/Rain Gardens Figure 9 – Private Driveway Replacement Program Figure 10 – Private Sanitary Sewer Service Replacement Program List of Appendices Appendix A List of Figures Appendix B Estimated Project Costs Appendix C Estimated Assessment Rate Calculation for B618 Curb Reincorporation Appendix D Mock Assessment Roll Appendix E Summary of Fund Sources Estimated Cumulative Street Reconstruction Fund Deficit Appendix F Street Reconstruction Unit Costs Comparison Per Phase Potential Future Single Family Duplex Assessment Rate Comparison: Current Assessment Rate Trends vs. Projected Construction Cost Trends Appendix G Crystal Finance Department Street Reconstruction Fund Expenditures Crystal Finance Department Street Reconstruction Funding Sources Appendix H Storm Water Runoff Management and the Use of Rain Gardens Flyer September 2011 CRYST 117030 Page 1 Report on Feasibility 2012 - Phase 12 Forest North Street Reconstruction Prepared for Crystal, Minnesota 1.0 Introduction A report on feasibility for improvements to reconstruct the streets for Phase 12 was ordered by the Crystal City Council on June 21, 2011. Parameters and guidelines established in the Overall Study, the 2007 Update, construction and management experiences of Phases 1 through 11, and our current studies and investigations in the study area contain the basis for the general conclusions and recommendations found herein. The 2007 Update defined the boundaries of the Phase 12 improvement to include the area bounded by the Canadian Pacific Railroad north of 51st Place on the north, the New Hope corporate limits on the west, 47th Avenue on the south and Douglas Drive on the east. New Hope residents are included in the study area as shown on Figure No. 1. The work components analyzed are: 1. Reconstruction method involving recycling strategies for local non MSA streets. 2. Addition of sidewalk along Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets 49th, Fairview and Louisiana Avenues. Currently sidewalk exists on one side of MSA street 47th Avenue. 3. Examination of street width, parking, striping, and sidewalk options for 47th, 49th, Fairview and Louisiana Avenues. 4. Impacts that reconstruction activities have on boulevard retaining walls, trees, and landscape improvements. 5. Complete the construction of B618 curb and replace the “D” curb on all streets to city standards. 6. Repair or remove and replace failed existing City standard B618 curb. 7. Replacement and extension of the trunk storm sewer system. 8. Installation of rain gardens and drain tile systems to serve areas where needed and feasible. 9. Repair of sanitary sewer services and replacement of private driveways. 10. Scattered sanitary sewer and water main repairs. The report figures are located at the end of this report. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 2 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Pavement and Subgrade Soils The majority of the streets were originally constructed in the mid 1950s along with the sanitary sewer. Later in the mid 1960s, water main and storm sewer was constructed. Only portions of the existing pavements were removed and reconstructed to allow water main and storm sewer installation. Since then, the work done to the streets includes seal coating once every eight years through 2001 and miscellaneous patching and overlays. The pavement surfaces show signs of moderate to severe distresses that cause their deterioration. The 2007 Update documented the criteria used for the measurement of these distresses along all of the City’s local streets north of 42nd Avenue (with the exception of the Forest South neighborhood). Furthermore, the 2007 Update used the City’s Cartegraph PAVEMENTview PLUS (PVP) pavement management computer software program to establish those local streets north of 42nd Avenue (with the exception of the Forest South neighborhood) in the most immediate need of reconstruction from a cost/benefit point of view. When the additional data collected during the preparation of this Report on Feasibility is applied against the criteria documented in the 2007 Update, the following is revealed: 1. Bituminous pavement lasts 25 to 35 years based on initial construction and maintenance procedures used in Crystal, which may include milling and overlaying. 2. Extensive pavement repairs, or patches likely replacing cracked areas, were noted throughout the study area. The type of cracking indicating the most severe distress – alligator cracking – was observed on the majority of the streets. Alligator cracking is the sign of imminent structural failure and the last step prior to a pothole development. 3. Two soil borings were taken in April 2002, one along 48th Avenue between Louisiana and Maryland Avenues and one along Florida Avenue between 50th and Corvallis Avenues. An additional 29 soil borings were taken study area wide in July 2011. From these borings, a determination of soil conditions under the Phase 12 street pavements is made. 4. The borings indicate that west of a line drawn from the intersection of 49th and Nevada Avenues to the intersection of 47th and Maryland Avenues the subgrade soils are primarily clay mixed with sand. Subgrade soils that contain clay retain moisture in the spring, summer, and fall and frost in the winter. When the level of moisture in the clay soils rises above optimum in the spring, summer, and fall; or as the frost leaves at the end of winter; they become structurally weak. This explains why in Figure No. 8 homes reporting sump pumps are most visible in the project area with these primarily clay mixed with sand soils. Widespread alligator cracking would be a normal expectation for this area. However, the prevalence of concrete curb and gutter and favorable drainage slopes in this region have prevented extensive alligator cracking. 5. The borings indicate that east of a line drawn from the intersection of 49th and Nevada Avenues to the intersection of 47th and Maryland Avenues the subgrade soils are primarily sandy mixed with silt. Soils that contain sand shed moisture and are less frost sensitive. Subsequently, they are structurally stronger. This explains why in Figure No. 8 there are fewer homes reporting sump pumps east of the clay mixed with sand subgrade area. 6. The streets have settled at many sanitary sewer and water service locations resulting in birdbaths. In addition, the crown of the street is gone in many areas that do not have curb and gutter allowing surface water runoff to flow randomly down the street and not in the Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 3 gutter or along the edge of bituminous pavement. Both of these conditions have contributed to more water soaking into the underlying soils through cracks in the surface. The water weakens the soil which leads to structural failure when driven upon. 7. Increased traffic volumes and weathering are other factors contributing to the conclusion that the streets in Phase 12 need reconstruction. 8. Local streets in the study area with existing curb and gutter were constructed to Crystal’s standard 30-foot width. Those streets with curb and gutter on one side or no curb and gutter were constructed approximately 28 feet wide. 9. The following pavements are centered in a right-of-way (ROW) less than 60 feet: a. 49th Avenue (pavement width of 37 feet wide, ROW width of 30 feet), b. 51st Place between Florida Avenue and Douglas Drive (pavement width of between 27 and 29 feet wide, ROW width of 40 feet), c. Florida Avenue between 50th Avenue and 51st Place (pavement width of 27 feet wide, ROW width of 40 feet between 50th and Corvallis Avenues and 50 feet between Corvallis Avenues and 120 feet south of 51st Place), d. Hampshire Avenue between 50th Avenue and 51st Place (pavement width of 27 feet wide, ROW width of 40 feet between 50th and Corvallis Avenues and 50 feet between Corvallis Avenues and 51st Place), e. Jersey Avenue between 50th and Corvallis Avenues (pavement width of 27 feet wide, ROW width of 40 feet between 50th Avenue and the alley between 50th and Corvallis Avenues and 50 feet between the alley between 50th and Corvallis Avenues and Corvallis Avenue), f. Louisiana Avenue between Fairview and 50th Avenues (pavement width of 30 feet wide, ROW width of 30 feet), and g. Louisiana Avenue between 50th and Corvallis Avenues (pavement width of 29 feet wide, ROW width of 33 feet). 2.2 Sidewalks Concrete sidewalk exists within the project area along 47th Avenue as shown in Figure 2. Concrete sidewalk exists along the perimeter of the project area on Douglas Drive, Hampshire Avenue and Louisiana Avenue as shown in Figure 2. The condition of these sidewalks is generally satisfactory. 2.3 Right-of Way, Easements and Alleys The streets within the study area are built approximately in the center of the right-of-way (ROW). The ROW width within the project area is 60-feet wide, except on: 1. 49th Avenue, 2. 6313, 6515, 6529, 6601 and 6607 50th Avenue, 3. 51st Place between Georgia Avenue and Douglas Drive, 4. 4957 Douglas Drive, 5. 6324, 6526, 6600 and 6602 Fairview Avenue, 6. Florida Avenue between 50th Avenue and 120 feet south of 51st Place, Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 4 7. Hampshire Avenue between 50th Avenue and 51st Place, 8. Jersey Avenue between 50th and Corvallis Avenues, and 9. Louisiana Avenue between Fairview and Corvallis Avenues. The project has alleys along the north side of Fairview Avenue between Louisiana and Florida Avenues. A street easement exists at: 1. 6515, 6529, 6601, 6607 and 6621 50th Avenue, 2. 51st Place between Georgia Avenue and Douglas Drive, 3. 6526, 6600 and 6602 Fairview Avenue, 4. 5009 Florida Avenue, 5. Florida Avenue between 50th and Fairview Avenues, 6. Florida Avenue between Corvallis and 120 feet south of 51st Place, and 7. Hampshire Avenue between Corvallis Avenue and 51st Place. 2.4 Concrete Curb and Gutter Figure No. 6 shows the locations of the 3 concrete curb conditions in the study area: No Curb, Existing B618 Curb, and Existing “D” Curb. 2.4.1 No Curb 17% of the streets were built without any curb. At the time the initial street construction occurred approximately 50 years ago, concrete curb and gutter was not a City standard but was left up to the developers to install at their option. 2.4.2 Existing B618 Curb 22% of the streets were built with City standard B618 curb with a 6-inch high face. A detailed field review of the existing B618 curb condition was performed. The following criteria were used to determine unacceptable curb needing repair or complete removal and replacement. 1. The curb section needs repair if no more than two minor defects were found on it, e.g., several tight cracks, settlement, or a scaled and spalled curb face. 2. The curb section needs removal and replacement if one major defect was found on it, e.g., a faulted crack. 3. The curb section needs removal and replacement if three or more minor defects were found on it, e.g., several tight cracks, settlement, a scaled and spalled curb face, or scalped top. 4. The curb section or sections need removal and replacement if there are significant drainage problems due to flat curb slopes. Approximately 11% of the existing B618 curb was found to be in need of repair or replacement. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 5 2.4.3 Existing “D” Curb 61% of the streets were built with non-City standard “D” curb that has a steeply sloping 6- inch high face. Applying the same criteria used to determine whether or not B618 curb needed repair or replacement reveals that approximately 75% of the existing “D” curb needs repair or replacement with the remaining 25% showing signs of deterioration. While the construction details from about 50 years ago for the existing “D” curb are unknown, visual inspections indicate that its high failure rate could be caused by the absence of air additives in the curb’s concrete. These additives aid concrete’s durability against freeze and thaw cycles. 2.5 Retaining Walls Figure No. 2 shows the locations of 6 retaining walls inside the ROW. The walls were privately constructed. The City performs no maintenance on them. The walls are constructed of timber or masonry blocks. While the walls are mostly in satisfactory condition all of them are along the edges of driveways. They leave no room for the installation of proposed B618 curb and gutter. 2.6 Boulevard Trees and Staircases Many trees are located within the ROW. The trees range in size between 4 and 60 inches in diameter. Figure No. 2 shows the location of staircases inside the right of way. 2.7 Sight Triangle Obstructions Possible sight triangle obstructions such as trees, branches, or foliage are located at the following locations: 1. Southwest corner of 47th and Jersey Avenues, 2. Northeast corner of 47th and Hampshire Avenues, 3. Northwest and northeast corners of 47th and Georgia Avenues, 4. Northeast corner of 48th and Jersey Avenues, 5. Northwest corner of 48th and Hampshire Avenues, 6. Southeast corner of 48th and Edgewood Avenues, 7. Southeast corner of Fairview and Florida Avenues, 8. Southeast corner of Corvallis and Hampshire Avenues, 9. Southeast corner of Corvallis and Florida Avenues, 10. Southwest corner of 51st Pl and Hampshire Avenues, and 11. Southeast corner of 51st Pl and Edgewood Avenues. 2.8 Drainage Two types of drainage have an impact in the study area. The first type – surface water runoff – results from rainfall or snow melt. The second type is groundwater flow. 2.8.1 Surface Water Runoff Much of the area relies upon surface grading to transport runoff to the street. Once in the street, runoff flows approximately 500 feet to the nearest storm sewer inlet which is the maximum recommended distance. Additionally, some of the area relies upon long swales Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 6 running in backyards to transport runoff to storm sewer. Figure No. 7 shows the extent of the existing storm sewer collection system. While some of the runoff has to travel a considerable distance in the street before entering a storm sewer inlet, the terrain in the Phase 12 area allows the runoff in most cases reach those inlets. The storm sewer systems in the Forest North Neighborhood flow either: 1. South into Memory Lane Pond, which is interconnected via storm water pipes to Brownwood, Hagermeister and Gaulke ponds, or 2. Northeast into a series of detention ponds south of the Canadian Pacific Railroad adjacent to West Broadway and 51st Place. The series of detention ponds are interconnected via storm water pipes and eventually drain to Twin Lakes in the Shingle Creek Watershed District. Consultation with city staff, questionnaire responses, and field investigation identified the following specific locations where runoff pools in the street. 1. Intersection of 47th and Hampshire Avenues 2. Intersection of 48th and Louisiana Avenues 3. Intersection of 48th and Maryland Avenues 4. Intersection of 51st Place and Hampshire Avenue 5. Intersection of 58th and Idaho Avenues 6. 6305 Corvallis Avenue 7. Intersection of Corvallis and Florida Avenues 8. Intersection of Corvallis and Hampshire Avenues 9. 5001 Douglas Drive 10. 4818 Edgewood Avenue 11. 4832 Edgewood Avenue 12. Intersection of Fairview and Georgia Avenues 13. Intersection of Fairview and Hampshire Avenues 14. 5122 Florida Avenue Of the 32 residents shown in Figure 8 that reported surface or ground water problems in their questionnaire responses, 12 of those residents indicated that runoff pools in their alley, rear yard or side yard. These drainage problems continue to be investigated. According to the City’s Utility Department the majority of the catch basin structures in the study area are precast concrete structures. The 15-inch corrugated metal pipe under the pavement along 49th Avenue is near failure. 2.8.2 Groundwater Flows When sandy clay subgrade soils exist, there are usually horizontal layers of sandier porous soils. Groundwater accumulates within these layers. The outlet for a portion of this accumulated groundwater has been basements of homes and sanitary sewers through cracks Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 7 in the pipes. Figure No. 8 shows that homes with sump pumps exist primarily in the portion of the study area with sandy clay subgrade soils west of Maryland Avenue. Because the subgrade soils east of Maryland Avenue are generally sandy with silt, groundwater flows present fewer problems in that area. 2.9 Utilities 2.9.1 Public Utilities 2.9.1.1 City of Crystal Utilities 2.9.1.1.1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Pipe Sanitary sewer trunk pipe was installed during the mid to late 1950’s. There are some known deficiencies in the sanitary sewer trunk pipe network in the project area. 2.9.1.1.2. Sanitary Sewer Services As demonstrated during service pipe repairs in Phases 1 – 11, many of these service pipes have deteriorated and need to be repaired by the homeowner. New Hope property owners along Nevada and Louisiana Avenues discharge their sanitary sewer effluent into City of Crystal sanitary sewer trunk pipes. 2.9.1.1.3. Water Main Water main pipe was installed during early to mid 1960’s. There are some known deficiencies in the water main pipe network in the project area. 2.9.1.2 City of New Hope Utilities 2.9.1.2.1. Water Main The water mains are located on Nevada and 49th Avenues within the corporate limits. 16 Crystal residents are serviced from the Nevada Avenue water main. 2.9.2 Private Utilities Steel gas mains and services are buried under the street pavement and in the boulevards in the majority of the project area. Electric, telephone, and cable TV lines in the study area are all overhead or buried mostly outside of the street pavement area. Fiber optic cable runs along the south side of 48th Avenue between Georgia and Idaho Avenues. 3.0 Criteria for Investigation 3.1 Criteria The criteria for improvements proposed in this report include: 1. City of Crystal standards for street and utility construction. 2. City of New Hope standards for street construction. 3. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) State Aid street standards. 4. City of Crystal Storm Sewer Study and Preliminary Report for Storm Sewer Improvements dated 1968. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 8 5. City of Crystal Overall Study for the Phase 1 through 4 areas dated March 31, 1993, the Supplemental Report dated May 18, 1994. 6. City of Crystal Overall Study for Crystal’s Local Street Reconstruction Program dated March 10, 2003. 7. City of Crystal Update to the 2003 Overall Study for Crystal’s Local Street Reconstruction Program dated May 31, 2007. 8. City construction and management experiences of Phases 1 through 11. 9. Input received from the City Council at the September 6 work session. 10. Input received from the property owners in Phase 12. 11. Input received from New Hope city staff. 12. City of Crystal standard assessment policies. 3.2 Permits The improvements proposed in this report will require review and permit approval from the following agencies: 1. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Watershed District for grading and drainage. 2. MnDOT Metro State Aid. 3. Hennepin County Highway Department for grading, paving, signal and drainage work within their Douglas Drive ROW. 4. Canadian Pacific (CP) Railroad for grading and paving work within their ROW. 5. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for sanitary sewer improvements. 6. Minnesota Department of Health for water system improvements. 4.0 Proposed Improvements 4.1 Pavements 4.1.1 MSA Street Alternatives Phase 12 streets on Crystal’s MSA system are 47th Avenue between Louisiana Avenue and Douglas Drive, 49th Avenue, Fairview Avenue and Louisiana Avenue between 47th and Fairview Avenues. They have average daily traffic counts of: 1. 850 along 47th Avenue west of Hampshire Avenue and 1,450 east of Hampshire Avenue, 2. 2,800 along 49th Avenue, 3. 1,900 along Fairview Avenue, and 4. 600 along Louisiana Avenue. MSA standards describe these streets as low density collectors. For the purpose of pavement design along these MSA streets, the average daily traffic volume is projected to grow at 2.0% annually during the 20-year design life of the pavement. 4.1.1.1 Width and Parking MnDOT has established minimum standard alternatives for the design and construction of MSA streets that must be met to be eligible for funding. The minimum width and parking Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 9 alternatives, taking into account the projected traffic, applicable to MSA streets in the study area include: 1. 26-foot wide with no parking either side 2. 32-foot wide with parking one side 3. 38-foot wide with parking both sides 4.1.1.1.1. 47th, Fairview and Louisiana Avenues Based on parameters and guidelines set forth in the 2007 Update and construction and management experience gained in Phases 1 – 11, Alternative 2, a 32-foot wide street with parking along one side is proposed because it: 1. Provides for on-street parking. 2. Provides an improved area for safer pedestrian travel in the parking lane. 3. Is consistent with the reconstruction of other MSA streets in Phases 1 through 11 that increases familiarity of use among motorists. 4.1.1.1.2. 49th Avenue Based on parameters and guidelines set forth in the 2007 Update and construction and management experience gained in Phases 1 – 11, a 37-foot wide street with parking along one side is proposed because it: 1. Matches the existing width and usage. 2. Provides for on-street parking and a buffer zone. 3. Provides an improved area for safer pedestrian travel in the parking lane. 4. Is consistent with the reconstruction of MSA street Corvallis Avenue in Phase 9. The Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices recommends striping between traffic lanes and along parking lanes. This is consistent with striping decisions made in Phases 1 through 11. 4.1.1.2 Sidewalks Sidewalks and trails are not required by MSA standards but are eligible for MSA funding if included. The 2007 Update states that the City should consider adding a concrete sidewalk along one side of the MSA streets. It is proposed to add the sidewalk adjacent to the parking lane along MSA streets 47th Avenue west of Hampshire Avenue, Fairview and Louisiana Avenues in the project area. The parking lane provides a safety buffer zone between the traffic lane and the sidewalk itself. It is proposed to reincorporate the existing sidewalk on 47th Avenue east of Hampshire Avenue and on 49th Avenue as shown in Figure 2. Street reconstruction work will include removal and replacement of failed sections of the existing sidewalk. Concrete sidewalk is proposed along the MSA streets 47th Avenue west of Hampshire Avenue, Fairview and Louisiana Avenues for the following reasons. 1. The neighborhood already uses the existing sidewalk along 47th Avenue east of Hampshire Avenue. 2. MSA streets generally have higher traffic volumes than non MSA streets. 3. Today’s higher traffic volumes and speeds pose a greater safety risk for pedestrians. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 10 4. Sidewalk construction along the MSA local street grid extends the existing citywide sidewalk system and promotes future addition to the same. 5. Sidewalk construction is a MSA reimbursable expense. 6. Sidewalks along the project area’s MSA streets will provide safer pedestrian access from the project area to current trails and sidewalks that lead to amenities such as: a. The Forest Elementary School, b. The Evergreen Montessori School, c. The Crystal Community Center and swimming pool, d. New Hope Ice Arena, e. Welcome Park, f. Memory Lane Pond, g. Fred Sims Park, h. The church at Hampshire and 46th Place, i. The county library, j. City Hall, k. Bus stops, and l. Shopping along 42nd Avenue. While sidewalks were not added to all of the MSA streets during previous Phases of local street reconstruction, they were added to the following MSA streets for reasons similar to the above: 1. Hampshire Avenue between the north side of Valley Place Park and Valley Place in Phase 3. 2. 32nd Avenue between both Hampshire Avenue and Douglas Drive and approximately Xenia and Welcome Avenues in Phases 3 and 4 respectively. 3. Welcome and Noble Avenues, between 34th and 36th Avenues, in Phases 4 and 5 respectively. 4. Hampshire Avenue between 38th and 42nd Avenues in Phase 6. 5. 38th Avenue between Hampshire Avenue and Douglas Drive in Phase 6. 6. 38th Avenue between Douglas Drive and Adair Avenue in Phase 7. 7. Adair Avenue between 36th and 42nd Avenues in Phase 7. 8. Hampshire Avenue between 42nd and 47th Avenues in Phase 8. 9. Louisiana Avenue between 42nd and 47th Avenues in Phase 8. 10. Corvallis Avenue between West Broadway and the project limits west of County Road 81 in Phase 9. 11. Vera Cruz Avenue between West Broadway and Fairview Avenue in Phase 9. 12. 47th Avenue between Douglas Drive and Welcome Avenue in Phase 10. 13. Adair Avenue between 42nd and 47th Avenues in Phase 10. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 11 14. 58th Avenue between Sumter Avenue and Douglas Drive in Phase 11. A concrete sidewalk was also added along the following non MSA streets: 1. Regent Avenue between 34th and 36th Avenues in Phase 5. 2. Florida Avenue between 42nd Avenue and 130 feet north of 42nd Avenue in Phase 8. 3. Vera Cruz Avenue between Fairview Avenue and the project limits south of County Road 81 in Phase 9. 4. 51st Avenue between Toledo Avenue and 500 feet west of Toledo Avenue in Phase 9. The City also removed existing sidewalk at the following locations that was either redundant with existing or proposed sidewalk or lead nowhere: 1. Along the north side of 38th Avenue between Zane Avenue and 150 feet west of Adair Avenue in Phase 7. 2. Along the west side of Hampshire Avenue between 46th Place and 150 feet south of 46th Place in Phase 8. 3. Along the south side of 46th Place between Hampshire Avenue and 120 feet west of Hampshire Avenue in Phase 8. 4. Along the south side of 43rd Avenue between Memory Lane and 130 feet east of Memory Lane in Phase 8. 5. Along the north side of Corvallis Avenue between West Broadway and the BNSF Railroad right-of-way in Phase 9. Furthermore, bituminous trails have already been added to the following MSA local streets to provide safe passage for pedestrian and bicycle traffic between City parks located in Phases 3 and 4: 1. 32nd Avenue between Louisiana and Hampshire Avenues and Douglas Drive and Xenia Avenue in Phases 3 and 4 respectively. 2. Hampshire Avenue between 32nd Avenue and the north side of Valley Place Park. 4.1.2 Local non MSA Street Width, Parking, and Sidewalks 4.1.2.1 Street width As shown on Figure No. 4, local streets with existing type “D” concrete curb and gutter are proposed to be reconstructed to the existing width which is approximately 30 feet face-to-face of the curb. Streets with no existing curb and gutter or type “D” curb and gutter on one side would be constructed with new B618 curb to a width of 30 feet face-to-face of the curb. The resulting total section width would be 12-inches wider on each side wherever curb and gutter is added. Exceptions to the proposed 30-foot street primarily due to the existing narrow ROW are: 1. Hampshire Avenue north of 51st Place – 27-foot, and 2. Jersey Avenue between 150 feet south of Corvallis Avenue and Corvallis Avenues – 27- foot. 4.1.2.2 Parking Parking would be available on either side and regulated by current city parking ordinances. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 12 4.1.2.3 Sidewalk Due to the presence of the Forest Elementary School, the Council may wish to consider additional sidewalks at the following locations: 1. South side of 48th Avenue between Louisiana and Hampshire Avenues, and 2. West side of Hampshire Avenue between 47th and 48th Avenues. The addition of either or both of these sidewalk locations will be determined following further discussions with the City Council, Independent School District 281 staff, and property owners adjacent to the sidewalk locations. The construction cost for the optional sidewalks are: 1. 48th Avenue between Louisiana and Hampshire Avenues – $18,930 2. Hampshire Avenue between 47th and 48th Avenues – $9,580 The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission requested that a sidewalk along 48th Avenue between Hampshire Avenue and Douglas Drive be investigated to facilitate a connection between the Community Center and the recreational facilities at Forest Elementary School. Both Community Development and Engineering staff do not advocate a sidewalk in this location because: 1. The sidewalk crossing at Douglas Drive would be uncontrolled, and 2. Two Douglas Drive sidewalk crossings between 47th and Fairview Avenues already exist. 4.1.3 Street and Sidewalk Pavement Sections 4.1.3.1 MSA Streets The final MSA street section will be discussed with residents living along the MSA streets at neighborhood meetings later this Fall. The meetings will coincide with the preparation of final bidding documents. The MSA street and pavement sections are shown on Figure No. 3 for 47th, 49th, Fairview and Louisiana Avenues. 4.1.3.1.1. 47th Avenue The street is proposed at 32 feet wide consisting of two 11-foot traffic lanes, a 2-foot reaction area on one side, and an 8-foot parking lane striped on the opposite side. The street crown is proposed to be located at the lane line between traffic lanes. West of Hampshire Avenue, the centerline of the street and sidewalk combination will be constructed at or near the center of the ROW. East of Hampshire Avenue, the centerline of the street will be constructed at or near the center of the ROW. Due to the proposed street width of 32 feet, which is more than the 30 foot with of the existing street, the existing B618 curb will also be removed and reconstructed. The parking lane is proposed along the north side of the street because it’s adjacent to the existing and proposed sidewalk in the north boulevard. The pavement section consists of excavation and replacement with 12 inches of class 5 aggregate base, 4 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing and B618 concrete curb and gutter due to school bus traffic 4.1.3.1.2. 49th Avenue To satisfy both the Cities of Crystal and New Hope, the street is proposed at 37 feet wide consisting of two 12-foot traffic lanes, a 5-foot striped buffer zone on one side, and an 8-foot striped parking lane. The street crown is proposed to be located at the lane line between traffic lanes. The centerline of the street will be constructed at the center of the existing street. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 13 The parking lane is proposed along the north side of the street because it’s adjacent to the existing sidewalk in the north boulevard. The pavement section consists of excavation and replacement with 12 inches of select granular borrow, 10 inches of class 5 aggregate base and 3 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing. Additionally, 30 inches of unsuitable material will be excavated and replaced with select granular borrow west of Maryland Avenue. The existing type “D” curb along the south side of the street will be removed and replaced with B618 concrete curb and gutter. 4.1.3.1.3. Fairview Avenue The street is proposed at 32 feet wide consisting of two 11-foot traffic lanes, a 2-foot reaction area on one side, and an 8-foot parking lane striped on the opposite side. The street crown is proposed to be located at the lane line between traffic lanes. The street and sidewalk combination will be constructed 1-foot north of the existing utility poles that occupy Fairview Avenues south boulevard. Due to the proposed street width of 32 feet, which is more than the 30 foot with of the existing street, the existing B618 curb will also be removed and reconstructed. The parking lane is proposed along the north side of the street because it’s adjacent to the sidewalk proposed in the north boulevard. The pavement section consists of excavation and replacement with 8 inches of class 5 aggregate base, 3 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing and B618 concrete curb and gutter. Additionally, 12 inches of unsuitable material will be excavated and replaced with select granular borrow east of Florida Avenue. A drain tile system will also be placed along both sides of the streets 100 feet each way of low point catch basins. 4.1.3.1.4. Louisiana Avenue The street is proposed at 32 feet wide consisting of two 11-foot traffic lanes, a 2-foot reaction area on one side, and an 8-foot parking lane striped on the opposite side. The street crown is proposed to be located at the lane line between traffic lanes. The centerline of the street and sidewalk combination will be constructed at or near the center of the ROW. The parking lane is proposed along the east side of the street because it’s adjacent to the sidewalk proposed in the east boulevard. The pavement section consists of excavation and replacement with 12 inches of class 5 aggregate base, 4 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing and B618 concrete curb and gutter due to school bus traffic. 4.1.3.2 Local non MSA Streets The local non MSA street and pavement section is shown on Figure No. 4. The proposed 30- foot street would consist of two 13-foot traffic lanes and a 2-foot reaction area on each side. Exceptions to the proposed 30-foot street are referenced in section 4.1.2. The street crown is proposed at the line between the traffic lanes. Construction will be on or near the center of the rights-of-way or located to minimize impacts to existing trees, sidewalks, fences, retaining walls and other ROW features. Full-depth reclaimed aggregate base construction will be used in Phase 12. The method involves grinding together the existing bituminous and gravel base. The resulting product is a remanufactured gravel base. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 14 This new gravel base would be placed to a thickness of 6 inches and covered with 3 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing. This method will result in a street system with a 20 year design life, extending to 35 useful years with appropriate maintenance, which may include milling and overlaying. The pavement section will consist of excavation and replacement with 12 inches of class 5 aggregate base, 4 ½ inches of bituminous surfacing and B618 concrete curb and gutter along the following streets due to school bus traffic: 1. 48th Avenue between Louisiana and Hampshire Avenues 2. Hampshire Avenue between 47th and 48th Avenues To satisfy both the Cities of Crystal and New Hope, the reclaimed gravel base would be placed to a thickness of 8 inches and covered with 3.5 inches of bituminous surfacing on Louisiana Avenue north of Fairview Avenue and Nevada Avenue. Additionally, 12 inches of unsuitable material will be excavated and replaced with select granular borrow on Nevada Avenue. In addition, geotextile fabric will be installed along Louisiana and Nevada Avenues for additional stabilization and to separate the different soil types. Soil borings indicate that thin existing pavement sections may restrict the production of reclaimed aggregate base at many locations in the study area to amounts less than that needed to reconstruct the streets in those areas. Therefore, it is assumed that the streets in those areas will be reconstructed using both the reclaimed and imported class 5 aggregate bases. Such streets will require the contractor to not only reclaim, but also excavate and haul off-site enough street subgrade material to construct the local street section with the combination of imported and reclaimed aggregate bases. 4.1.3.3 Sidewalks The final sidewalk locations will be discussed with residents living along the MSA streets later this Fall. The meetings will coincide with the preparation of final bidding documents. The new sidewalks along the MSA streets are proposed to be behind the curb on the same side of the street as the parking lane. The sidewalk should be 5 feet wide and have a pavement section of 4 inches of concrete on 4 inches of granular bedding. 4.1.3.3.1. 47th Avenue Favorable topography exists along the boulevard on the north side of 47th Avenue. A sidewalk on the north side of 47th Avenue is proposed because a sidewalk already exists along the north side of 47th Avenue east of Hampshire Avenue and it offers residents an off-street connection to: 1. The Forest Elementary school, 2. The Evergreen Montessori School, and 3. Welcome Park east of Xenia Avenue and south of 47th Avenue. The existing sidewalk along the north side of 47th Avenue east of Hampshire Avenue will be reincorporated into the project. 4.1.3.3.2. 49th and Fairview Avenues The existing sidewalk along the north side of 49th Avenue will be reincorporated into the project. Favorable topography exists along the boulevard on both sides of the street along the majority of Fairview Avenue. Sidewalk is proposed along the north side of the street because a Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 15 sidewalk already exists along the north side of 49th Avenue and it offers residents an off-street connection to: 1. The New Hope Ice Arena, and 2. The Crystal Community Center and swimming pool on Douglas Drive and Fairview Avenue. Because a sidewalk is proposed along the north side of Fairview Avenue proposed retaining walls will be constructed to fit in the proposed sidewalk as shown in Figure 2. 4.1.3.3.3. Louisiana Avenues Favorable topography exists along the boulevard on both sides of the street of Louisiana Avenues. Sidewalk is proposed along the east side of the street because a sidewalk already exists along the east side of Louisiana Avenue south of 47th Avenue and it offers residents an off-street connection to: 1. The Forest Elementary school, 2. Memory Lane Pond, and 3. Fred Sims Park. 4.1.4 Street Crown One way to extend a local street’s life is to remove the storm water runoff from the street’s surface before it can soak through surface cracks into the street’s subgrade soils. This is particularly true where there is a reliance on long overland flow routes along the street’s edge to convey runoff to storm sewer catch basins. A local street’s crown, or cross slope, can efficiently direct the runoff to the gutter. Due to the reliance on long overland flow routes along the street’s edge, a 3% crown is proposed along all streets in the study area. 4.2 Right-of-Ways and Rights of Entry ROW is sufficiently wide for the street reconstruction work on the majority of the streets. Due to narrow right-of-way at the following locations, temporary construction easements or rights of entry may be necessary: 1. 49th Avenue, 2. 6313 50th Avenue, 3. 4957 Douglas Drive, 4. 6324 Fairview Avenue, 5. 6505 Corvallis Avenue 6. Hampshire Avenue between 50th and Corvallis Avenues, 7. Jersey Avenue between 50th and Corvallis Avenues, and 8. Louisiana Avenue between Fairview and Corvallis Avenues. No improvements are proposed within the alleys within the project area. Rights of Entry (ROE) may also be needed in areas with steep driveways or boulevards to restore these boulevards and driveways after street reconstruction. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 16 4.3 Concrete Curb and Gutter Figure No. 6 shows locations of the 3 concrete curb conditions in the study area: No Curb, Existing B618 Curb, and Existing “D” Curb. 4.3.1 No Curb Streets without curb will be upgraded to City standard B618 curb. The proposed curb and gutter will significantly improve drainage flow, provide a structural support to reduce edge deterioration, and protect boulevards from traffic and snow plowing. 4.3.2 Existing B618 Curb It is proposed to reincorporate existing B618 curb into the project. Because a commitment will be made to extend the life of this curb as much as 35 years, local street reconstruction work will include the repair or removal and replacement of the existing curb. In particular, it is proposed to white wash existing curb to match the proposed curbs, or completely remove and replace failed or flat sections of existing B618 curb. 4.3.3 Existing “D” Curb Today 9.7 times more “D” curb than B618 curb needs repair or replacement. If today’s “D” curb is repaired, or removed and replaced, like the B618 curb, “D” curb not needing repair in 2012 will pose a long term maintenance burden and contribute to a shortened life for the new street. Nothing suggests that the rate of deterioration in the “D” curb will decrease. Absences of air additives in its concrete will likely cause even higher rates of deterioration during future freeze-thaw cycles. Therefore, it is proposed to remove all existing “D” curb and replace it with B618 curb. 4.4 Retaining Walls The walls shown in Figure No. 2 are along the edges of driveways and will need adjustment near the street to fit them to the alignment of the proposed back of the curb. Due to the sidewalk installation along the north side of state aid street Fairview Avenue and street grading concerns along 47th, 50th, Corvallis, Fairview, Florida and Jersey Avenues, construct modular block walls at the following addresses: 1. 6425 and 6501 47th Avenues, 2. 6425, 6500 and 6505 Corvallis Avenues, 3. 6504, 6520, 6526, 6600 and 6602 Fairview Avenues, 4. 5102, 5108 and 5109 Florida Avenues, and 5. 4939, 4957 and 5001 Jersey Avenue. In all situations, the final design details will be discussed at future meetings with the residents. 4.5 Boulevard Trees and Staircases When boulevard trees interfere with street reconstruction activities, as shown in Figure No. 2, the tree will be removed and replaced with a nursery stock tree. Before removing a tree, attempts will be made to either adjust the alignment of the proposed street and/or install the curb by hand rather than machine to avoid the removal of the tree. Figure No. 2 shows where improvements may trigger boulevard tree removal in front of homes. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 17 In all situations involving trees impacted by street reconstruction activities, the impacted resident will be contacted and involved with the design details. When existing staircases interfere with street reconstruction activities, as shown in Figure No. 2, the staircase will be removed and replaced. 4.6 Private Driveway Reconstruction A private driveway reconstruction program similar to that offered in Phase 11 is proposed in Phase 12. Figure No. 9 shows that 101 residents are interested in reconstructing their private driveway. Due to the large number of residents expressing apparent interest in reconstructing their driveway, City staff will again turn the administration of the program to the contractor. In particular, the contractor will prepare the quotes and schedule the reconstruction. City staff will continue to review each proposed driveway improvement and quote. 4.7 Stop Signs Stop control at numerous locations in the project area will be evaluated and considered for possible changes. 4.8 Drainage The proposed storm sewer collection system is shown in Figure No. 7. The system does not redirect runoff to a pond, creek, or existing storm sewer pipe different from the one it ultimately arrives at today. The system is consistent with Crystal’s 1968 Storm Sewer Study. Typically, storm sewer consists of a main line with branches and catch basins. Where applicable, 4-inch services will be extended to the abutting properties with a sump box on the end. This will provide property owners with a reliable outlet for their sump pumps. This system has two main components, MSA street and local non MSA street. Shingle Creek Watershed District will not require extensive storm water treatment, such as property acquisition for nurp ponds, for storm water prior to entering into Twin Lakes. 4.8.1 MSA Streets For the MSA streets within the project area, MSA design requires that driving lanes be protected from flooding caused by a 3-year design storm. If necessary, catch basins will be located at intersections along the expansion to reduce both cross gutter drainage flows and standing water in the intersections. 4.8.1.1 47th Avenue XP-SWMMTM storm system hydraulic study results indicate that the existing 47th Avenue system is adequate to handle the MSA 3-year design storm. However, storm sewer catch basins will be added to 47th Avenue because the driving lanes are encroached by flooding for the 3-year MSA design storm. 4.8.1.2 49th Avenue The corrugated metal storm sewer pipe mid block between Nevada and Maryland Avenues will be replaced. Following this replacement, the storm sewer will be adequate to handle the MSA 3-year design storm Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 18 4.8.1.3 Fairview Avenue Trunk storm sewer pipe will be added to Fairview Avenue between Kentucky and Georgia Avenues because the driving lanes are encroached by flooding for the 3-year MSA design storm. The trunk storm sewer pipe between Georgia and Florida avenues will be increased in size in order to convey a 3-year design storm. 4.8.1.4 Louisiana Avenue Trunk storm sewer pipe will be added to 48th Avenue between Louisiana and Kentucky Avenues because the Louisiana Avenue driving lanes are encroached by flooding for the 3- year MSA design storm. 4.8.2 Local non MSA Streets At some locations, the existing storm sewer pipe network is unable to convey runoff from the City’s standard 2-year design storm. However, combining the existing street valley gutters with the existing storm sewer pipe network generally satisfies the drainage needs of the study area. Because runoff arriving at the pipe from distant locations via valley gutters does not arrive until the pipe has already passed runoff from near locations. 4.8.2.1 Maintenance Issues All block and mortar catch basins will be replaced with new precast concrete catch basins. Additionally, catch basins will be replaced as necessary when widening the existing street width to the proposed street width. 4.8.2.2 Concrete Valley Gutters The system may also includes a series of proposed concrete valley gutters (gutters). These are similar in style and function to the gutters installed in Phases 5 through 11. The gutters will convey storm water runoff through intersections without catch basins to intersections with catch basins. 4.8.2.3 Area Drainage Concerns Proposed sewer pipe, the installation of concrete valley gutters, and the installation of concrete curb and gutter, will mitigate the problems causing runoff to pool along the edge of the street at the 14 locations given in section 2.7.1 of this report. 4.9 Rain Gardens As part of local street reconstruction in the Forest North neighborhood, City staff will offer rain gardens to better manage storm water runoff for consideration by the neighborhood’s residents. 4.9.1 Runoff Management Poor runoff management results in adverse down stream impacts such as, but not limited to, flooding, erosion, and poor water quality in nearby lakes and streams. The City is required to submit a permit to the MPCA outlining their plan to better manage its runoff. Constructing ponds in established neighborhoods like Forest North is not possible without acquiring property. Subsequently, the City must consider other tools to show the MPCA it is better managing its runoff in its established neighborhoods. 4.9.2 Background Information A rain garden is a landscaped area located in the City-owned boulevard. The area is slightly depressed to soak up some of the runoff before it can enter the storm sewer pipe network (network). This decreases the amount of runoff carried by the network to nearby lakes and Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 19 streams. When plants in the rain garden mature, the rain garden should be disguised as an aesthetic addition to the neighborhood. The plants can also help runoff reach into deeper subgrade soils and recharge nearby groundwater aquifers. The plants also aerate the garden’s soil to maintain its infiltration characteristics. Rain garden plants can handle extended periods of wet conditions. Potential standing water in the rain garden will be designed to dissipate quickly. 4.9.3 Proposed Locations Rain gardens work best in relatively flat boulevards with sandy, well-draining subgrade soils beneath them. The subgrade soils appear to be favorable east of Nevada Avenue to construct rain gardens. Some boulevards cannot accommodate rain gardens due to poor subgrade soils, steep slopes, or not enough space between the edge of the street’s pavement and the ROW line. The more rain gardens installed means less runoff carried by the network to nearby lakes and streams. Space is limited in the City-owned boulevard for locating a rain garden. The best place for a rain garden is close to driveway to ensure good drainage off of and away from the driveway. It is discouraged to locate rain gardens over gas, sewer, or water service pipes. Rain gardens should be placed so as to not interfere with existing trees, shrubs, or existing underground lawn irrigation or pet containment systems. Considering these factors, not much flexibility is available to locate a rain garden. Rain gardens have been effectively constructed on some gentle slopes to capture runoff before it enters the street. From the returned questionnaires, Figure No. 8 shows that 69 residents expressed an interest in having a rain garden in their boulevard. If favorable topography allows, and the City’s maintenance guidelines as noted in Section 4.8.4 are agreed upon, the residents east of Nevada Avenue can have a rain garden installed in the boulevard in front of their home. However, too many rain gardens consolidated in a small area will reduce the amount of storm water runoff received by each rain garden and may unfavorably impact the plantings. Engineering staff along with assistance from SEH will determine the optimum locations for rain gardens. Favorable locations for rain gardens on City owned property are limited in the Forest North neighborhood. However, installing boulevard grass depressions without plantings at select locations may also be considered to better manage storm water runoff. 4.9.4 Maintenance Rain garden plantings will be selected for low maintenance, which is not to say that they are maintenance free. Yearly maintenance for weeding, mulching, and plant replacement will be conducted by the City for a period of two years after the initial rain garden installation/planting. Individual homeowners will be responsible for weeding, mulching, and plant replacement after the two year City maintenance period, as necessary. Furthermore, individual homeowners will be responsible for watering immediately following the initial rain garden planting. 4.10 Drain Tile The proposed drain tile improvements are shown on Figure No. 8. The drain tile system proposed would intercept groundwater entering under the pavement and provide a dependable Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 20 outlet to which property owners could connect their sump pump discharge piping. The drain tile system would consist of a 4-inch perforated polyethylene pipe with drainage sock embedded in granular material installed behind the proposed curb and/or in front of the existing curb approximately three feet deep. Lateral services would be extended to adjoining properties as necessary with a sump box at the end. It is also proposed behind the proposed curb and/or in front of the existing curb approximately three feet deep for a distance 100 feet in each direction from catch basin low points. The system is proposed where feasible in those locations where problems have been identified. Drain tile is not proposed on both sides of local streets except where existing ground water problems warrant it. 4.11 Utilities 4.11.1 Public Utilities 4.11.1.1 City of Crystal Utilities 4.11.1.1.1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Pipe The sanitary sewer trunk pipe has been inspected by television cameras. The City plans to hire a contractor to structurally line the existing sanitary sewer trunk pipe before street reconstruction begins. 4.11.1.1.2. Sanitary Sewer Services City policy states that it is the property owner’s responsibility for the sewer service from the main to the house. If repairs are needed, the property owner would pay 100 percent of the cost including street resurfacing. During Phases 1 through 11, in conjunction with local street reconstruction activities, numerous sanitary sewer service repairs were made at the property owner’s request. In most cases, the connection of the 4-inch service pipe to the 6-inch service pipe was usually open and had sagged. This allowed tree roots to enter and debris to flow into the pipe compounding the problem. Materials used years ago for constructing sewer services have a history of failing at the joints allowing tree roots to grow into the service pipe causing a blockage. Even though the roots can be cut, they become increasingly larger and a more frequent problem. The only permanent correction is to replace the pipe with new materials having watertight joints. From the returned questionnaires, Figure No. 10 shows that 128 residents indicated they are interested in repairing their sanitary sewer service. This number is expected to increase as the City completes its existing sanitary sewer televising inspections. A bid item to repair the service line will again be included in the final design documents. The Phase 12 property owner can elect to have the City’s contractor perform the work at the bid price or solicit bids from other contractors. In either case, the work would be done in conjunction with the street work, thus saving the property owner the cost of street repair. The cost of the work would then be separately assessed to each property having the work performed. 4.11.1.1.3. Water Main Minor improvements need to be performed to the water main network with this project. 4.11.1.2 City of New Hope Utilities 4.11.1.2.1. Water Main According to New Hope staff, no improvements need to be performed to the water main network with this project. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 21 4.11.2 Private Utilities The providers of natural gas, electric, telephone, and cable TV service within the study area were made aware of this project by letter in July 2011. At the time this report was prepared, only the natural gas provider, CenterPoint Energy had responded that they would upgrading their steel gas mains and services during street reconstruction activities. In Phases 1 through 11, gas mains and services were replaced at the gas company expense. City staff has approved CenterPoint Energy’s request to begin reconstructing their gas main in the study area during fall 2011. They would finish their work during spring 2012. This schedule will allow the City’s Phase 12 street reconstruction contractor to begin their work in spring 2012 with little interference from CenterPoint Energy’s crews. Utilities located on poles are mostly along rear lot lines in the study area. However, at street crossings, there are some poles adjacent to the edge of the streets, and poles at some intersections with streetlights. Coordination with the owners of these poles will be necessary in the event street reconstruction necessitates their being braced or relocated to fit the alignment of the proposed streets. Additionally, coordination with the owners of underground utilities will be necessary if street reconstruction requires their being relocated to fit the vertical alignment of the proposed streets. 5.0 Implementation 5.1 Estimated Project Costs The estimated project costs are separated into categories for ease of calculating proposed assessments. Indirect costs, which include engineering, legal costs, administrative expenses, and interim financing were estimated at 26% during local street reconstruction Phases 1 through 8. However, the indirect costs have been decreased to an estimated 22% based on experience from Phases 6 through 11. Because average bid costs from previous projects were used rather than low bid costs, the project costs do not include a contingency. The total estimated project cost calculated by this report is $6,610,292 as shown in Table 2. The 2007 Update estimated that the total project cost of the Phase 11 Forest North neighborhood would be $5,238,948 in 2008 dollars. The average annual increase in street reconstruction construction unit costs comparison per phase was 4.99% between Phase 1 in 1995 and Phase 12 in 2012. When adjusted for 4.99% inflation to 2012 dollars, the 2007 Update estimated the cost of Phase 12 Forest North project to be $6,365,548. This $282,653 change in the estimated cost is due to: 1. A smaller amount of existing B618 concrete curb and gutter per linear foot of project area when compared to previous phases, which increases the amount of: a. B618 concrete curb and gutter installation or replacement, b. Concrete and bituminous driveway replacement, and c. Topsoil and sod installation. 2. A thicker typical section due to school bus traffic along: a. 47th Avenue between Louisiana and Douglas Drive, b. 48th between Louisiana and Hampshire Avenues, and Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 22 c. Hampshire Avenue between 47th and 48th Avenues. 3. A increased interest in residential rain gardens when compared to previous phases, and 4. An increased amount of modular block retaining walls. Table 2 Breakout of Total Estimated Project Cost Item Estimated Project Cost City of Crystal Portion MSA Streets 47th Avenue$601,558 49th / Fairview Avenue$670,040 Louisiana Avenue$328,639 Local non MSA Streets $3,223,485 Local and MSA Storm Sewer $848,127 Concrete Curb and Gutter $707,082 City of Crystal Subtotal $6,378,929 City of New Hope Portion MSA Streets 49th Avenue$76,722 Local non MSA Streets $126,493 Local and MSA Storm Sewer $28,148 City of New Hope Subtotal $231,363 Total Estimated Project Cost $6,610,292 A detailed estimated project cost is included in Appendix B. 5.2 Preliminary Opinion of Property Benefit Past city practices and policies can be utilized to determine benefit for benefiting properties as follows: 1. Each single family/duplex lot will be assessed as one unit for their share of the cost of the Phase 12 street and storm sewer improvements. All commercial and non-profit properties, with the exception of City-owned property, will be assessed by the front-foot method for these same costs. a. Any single family/duplex lot with one side frontage along a proposed street improvement and the other along a county road or state highway will be counted as one-half a unit, except when such a unit’s driveway is along the proposed street improvement. Such a unit will still be considered a full unit. 2. For concrete curb and gutter assessment purposes, the front-foot method will apply to all benefiting properties. Property location identification is included in the Appendix D as part of the mock assessment role. 5.3 Proposed Financing The cornerstone of the City’s financing strategy in Phases 1 through 5 was the City’s pledge of MSA funds equal to 1/3rd of the total project cost. This strategy yielded equitable Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 23 assessment rates. As in Phases 6 through 11, the smaller amount of MSA designated streets in Phases 12 through 14 generate insufficient reimbursable MSA construction costs to fund 1/3rd of the total project cost. Additional funding sources are necessary in Phase 12 to continue the strategy. The additional funding sources are the Street Reconstruction Fund and revenue from the Storm Drain Utility Fund for storm sewer improvements. The use of these additional funding sources along with MSA funds is consistent with the strategy developed during Phases 1 through 11. The proportion of the total estimated project cost to be assessed for streets is calculated as shown in Table 3: Table 3 Net Cost for Street Assessment Total Estimated Project Cost $6,610,292 Less City of New Hope Cost $231,363 Less Concrete Curb and Gutter $707,082 Less Storm Drain Utility Fund $450,000 (1) Net Cost for Street Assessment $5,221,847 (2) (1) Based on correspondence from City Staff. (2) Before MSA deductions. The 2007 Update recommended that neighborhoods in Phases 12 -14 be grouped together as a single project for financing purposes. The result of this recommendation was given on Page 2 of 2 Combination 1: Alternate Funding Sources in Appendix B of the 2007 Update. This result was updated by this report per Phase for each Phase 12, 13, and 14. The update is titled Summary of Fund Sources – Without Sanitary and Watermain Improvements revised August 31, 2011 (SFS) and is located in Appendix E of this report. Also in Appendix E of this report is the Estimated Cumulative Street Reconstruction Fund Deficit (ECSRFD), assuming a $0 balance in 2011, taking one year off from street reconstruction in 2014. The effect of this ECSRFD is that the City must pledge funds equal to 1/3rd of the total project and / or increase the assessments to compensate for a $1,938,804 Street Reconstruction Fund Deficit following Phase 14. Appendix H of this report shows both the Crystal Finance Department Street Reconstruction Fund Expenditures and Funding Sources, which reports costs in constant dollars for each Phase. The funding sources show a surplus of $1,971,895 in 2018 following Phase 16, assuming the City takes only one year off from street reconstruction in 2014. This analysis is fundamentally sound assuming the expenditures and funding sources for each Phase increase at the same rate. However, as shown by the Appendix G spreadsheet titled “Potential Future Single Family Duplex Assessment Rate Comparison: Current Assessment Rate Trends vs. Projected Construction Cost Trends”, the funding sources historically increase at a smaller rate than the expenditures. 5.4 Assessments 5.4.1 Street Assessments The net cost to be assessed for streets on the remainder of the project is $5,221,847 before MSA funds and Street Reconstruction Fund deductions are deducted. The net cost must be Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 24 split between single family/duplex properties and the commercial and non-profit properties. We recommend the split be proportional to the total front footage (FF) in the Phase 12 study area. There are 43,847.54 FF in the study area of which 39,459.38 FF are single family/duplex property and 4,388.16 FF are “commercial and non-profit” property. Therefore, the cost splits are shown in Table 4. Table 4 Cost Splits Single Family/Duplex Property $5,221,847 x 89.99% $4,699,140 “Commercial and Non-profit” Property $5,221,847 x 10.01% $522,707 The Single Family/Duplex property category street assessment rate is calculated in Table 5. Table 5 Single Family/Duplex Street Assessment Rate Net Cost $4,699,140 Less MSA Construction Funds Generated (1) $1,720,008 Less MSA Maintenance Allotment (4) $0 Less Unfunded Amount (2) $535,384 Cost to be Assessed $2,443,749 Total Equivalent Single Family/Duplex Lots (3) 497 Proposed Single Family/Duplex Assessment Rate $4,917 (1) Phase 12 share of the MSA Construction Funds generated by Phases 12 through 14. The allotment is based on number of Single Family/Duplex Lots in each of Phases 12 through 14 divided by the total number of Single Family/Duplex Lots in Phases 12 through 14. (2) Increased from ($78,000) in cell 5N of the document titled Funding Summary revised 4/27/07 found in Appendix B of the 2007 Update to compensate for the construction costs increases and removal of maintenance allotment between Phase 12 and the 2007 Update. (3) There are 10 lots included in the total that are counted as one-half a unit for calculating the street assessment rate. (4) Beginning in 2012, the Maintenance Allotment will be transferred to the Street Maintenance fund. The “Commercial and Non-profit” property category street assessment rate is calculated in Table 6. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 25 Table 6 “Commercial and Non-profit” Property Street Assessment Rate Net Cost $522,707 Less Unfunded Amount $135,715.00 Assessable Front Footage (FF) 4,388.16 Proposed “Commercial and Non-profit” Property Street Assessment Rate $88.19 5.4.2 Concrete Curb and Gutter Assessments The total estimated cost for B618 concrete curb and gutter includes streets with No Curb, Existing B618 Curb and Existing “D” curb. 5.4.2.1 No Curb Properties benefiting from having proposed B618 curb installed along their street frontage will be assessed by the front foot at a rate of $18.88 per front foot. 5.4.2.2 Existing B618 Curb Properties benefiting from having the B618 curb along their street frontage reincorporated into the project will be assessed for its necessary repairs or removal and replacement. Since 1994 the cost to repair, or remove and replace, the curb prior to reincorporating it into the project was spread across the single family/duplex and other property categories assessment rates. Reincorporation costs were small enough to be considered a benefit to the entire neighborhood. However, since that policy began in 1994, the B618 curb in Phase 12 will have aged 19 more years when construction begins in spring 2012. Anticipating higher costs than were incurred in 1994 to reincorporate the B618 curb into the study area, it is proposed to assess a portion of the cost of the repairs, or removal and replacement, only to properties associated with the work. This is property that has existing B618 curb along all, or part of, their frontage, excluding City owned parcels. Appendix C shows that the estimated B618 reincorporation assessment rate is $4.91 per front foot. 5.4.2.3 Existing D Curb Since Phase 2, properties benefiting from having their existing “D” curb removed and replaced with B618 curb along their street frontage were credited for the useful life remaining in the “D” curb. Properties with existing “D” curb were credited 50% between Phases 2 and 5, and 25% between Phases 6 and 10. However, when this credit was implemented in 1995, the “D” curb in Phase 12 will have aged 17 years when construction begins in spring 2012. During this 17-year time period, the City has witnessed further “D” curb deterioration. The additional deterioration causes any credit to be inconsistent with the present condition of the “D” curb. Therefore, no credit is proposed for any life remaining in the “D” curb in the study area, consistent with the Phase 11 project. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 26 Properties benefiting from having their existing “D” curb removed and replaced with B618 curb along their street frontage will be assessed by the front foot at a rate of $18.88 per front foot. The concrete curb and gutter assessment calculation is based on the information given in Table 7. Table 7 Curb and Gutter Assessment Proposed B618 Curb Total Assessable Front Footage Properties with No Curb 7,679.35 Properties with Existing "D" Curb 27,523.98 Proposed Assessment Rates Properties with No Curb $18.88 Properties with Existing "D" Curb $18.88 Subtotal Estimated Proposed B618 Curb Cost to be Assessed $664,639 Reincorporated B618 Curb Total Assessable Front Footage 8,644.21 Proposed Assessment Rate $4.91 Subtotal Estimated Proposed Reincorporated B618 Curb Cost to be Assessed $42,443 Total Estimated Curb and Gutter Cost to be Assessed $707,082 The mock assessment roll is in Appendix D. 5.5 Future Maintenance The City Council has included an annual budgeted amount for single family/duplex lots and “commercial and non-profit property” in Phases 1 through 11 for long-term maintenance of newly reconstructed streets. However this annual amount was reduced by more than 50% to $60,000 in 2010. We recommend the finance contribution practice be continued by adding 497 lots and 4,388.16 front feet to Phases 1 through 11 totals for the 2012 budget. This provides funding to maintain the new streets throughout their useful life without the need for assessing seal coating or other related expenses. 6.0 Schedule 6.1 Project Schedule The following schedule has been developed to allow the construction of improvements described herein to be completed during 2012. There is some flexibility built into the schedule. The schedule should be reviewed and updated at each of the future City Council authorizations. Report on Feasibility CRYST 117030 Page 27 Table 8 Project Schedule Council Accepts Report and Orders Public Improvement Hearing Neighborhood Meeting Council Considers Approval of the Project and Authorization of Preparation of Plans and Specifications CenterPoint Energy Gas Main Reconstruction Prepare Plans and Specifications Overall Neighborhood Meeting at 90% Completion of Plans and Specifications Council Considers Acceptance of Final Plans and Specifications and Authorization of Advertisement for Bids Council Considers Accepting Bid, Awarding the Contract to the Low Bidder and Adopting the Assessment Roll CenterPoint Energy Gas Main and Service Pipe Reconstruction Construction Council Considers Adopting the Assessment Roll for Private Sanitary Sewer Service Repairs and Driveway Reconstruction Item Feb Mar AprS e pO c tN o vD e c S e pO c tN o v 2011 2012 May Jun Jul AugJan Appendix A List of Figures Figure 1 – Location Map Figure 2 – Street Summary Figure 3 – Typical Section Municipal State Aid Street Reconstruction Figure 4 –Typical Section - Local Street Reconstruction Figure 5 - Fall 2011 Gas Main Replacement Figure 6 – Curb Summary Figure 7 – Storm Sewer Figure 8 – Drain Tile/Rain Gardens Figure 9 – Private Driveway Replacement Program Figure 10 - Private Sanitary Sewer Service Replacement Program H a m p s h i r e A v e N K e n t u c A v e J e r s e A v e 4 7 t h A v e N I d a h o A v e L o u i s i a A v e N e v a d a A v e N F a i r v i e w A v e N 4 8 t h A v e N C o r v a l l i s A v e N L o u i s i a n a A v e N 5 1 s t P l N J e r s e y A v e N J e r s e y A v e N Douglas Dr NEdgewood Ave N 4 9 t h A v e N 5 0 t h A v e N 5 1 s t P l N M a r y l a n d A v e N Edgewood Ave N G e o r g i a A v e N K e n t u c k y A v e N F l o r i d a A v e N O r e g o n A v e N O r e g o n A v e N I d a h o A v e N C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Fo r e s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Glen Havens Memorial Gardens Cementery Crystal Community Center Ev e r g r e e n Mo n t e s s o r i Sc h o o l Ne w H o p e Ic e A r e n a 4623 72 1 3 72 2 5 51 5 5 51 5 3 68 0 5 68 1 1 6 8 1 7 68 2 3 69 0 1 6 9 0 7 6 9 1 3 69 1 9 70 0 5 70 1 1 7 0 1 7 70 2 3 66 3 5 67 0 9 67 1 5 67 2 1 67 2 9 64 1 9 64 2 5 64 3 1 65 0 3 65 0 9 65 1 5 65 2 1 65 2 7 66 0 5 66 1 1 66 1 7 66 2 3 66 2 9 54 54 54 69 0 1 72 0 5 7 1 3 3 7 1 2 7 7 1 2 1 7 1 1 3 7 1 0 5 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 70 0 7 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 2 8 69 0 6 6 9 0 0 69 1 8 69 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 7 0 2 4 46 2 0 70 0 1 69 1 9 69 1 1 69 0 7 46 1 8 68 2 1 68 1 5 68 0 9 68 0 1 70 1 5 54 54 46 2 1 64 2 9 64 1 7 4625 6315 6321 6401 64 0 9 65 1 9 65 2 5 66 0 1 66 0 7 66 1 3 46 2 8 4649 4641 46336318 6324 6400 64 0 6 64 1 6 64 1 0 64 2 8 64 2 2 65 0 0 6 5 0 6 65 1 8 65 1 2 65 2 4 66 0 0 66 1 2 66 0 6 66 2 4 6 6 1 8 64 0 7 65 1 3 65 0 7 65 0 1 5213 5241 510054 4720 471647244725 4717 4716 4702 6212 6206 6200 6118 6112 61064800 462246304651464546394629 46234628464046506215610161076113 6119 4640 46344641 4635 4629 65 1 5 51 4 7 51 3 9 51 4 0 5136 5126 4909 490163055009500163226400 6406 64 0 7 6401 6321 63115153514651495131512551095115511663285103 64 1 0 6 4 0 2 51 0 2 51 0 8 51 1 4 51 1 5 51 2 8 51 2 2 51 2 7 51 4 1 51 5 0 51 4 4 51 2 5 51 3 1 51 1 9 51 0 9 65 0 0 65 3 0 65 1 4 51 0 2 6 6 1 8 6 6 0 8 51 2 4 51 3 2 51 4 0 54 64 1 5 64 2 5 65 0 5 65 1 5 65 2 1 6 5 3 1 6 6 0 3 6 6 1 1 66 1 9 6 6 2 1 66 2 4 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 0 65 2 4 66 0 6 6 6 0 0 65 1 8 65 1 2 50 0 9 6 4 2 4 6 4 2 0 6321 6327 6401 64 0 9 6 4 1 7 64 2 5 64 2 8 64 2 0 6 4 1 2 6 4 0 4 6 3 3 0 66 1 3 66 1 9 66 2 7 66 2 6 66 1 8 66 1 2 66 0 0 54 65 1 1 4 9 5 7 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 4 73 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 4841 4833 48324840 47 2 5 47 1 7 65 0 0 6 5 0 8 65 2 0 47 2 0 47 2 4 47 0 1 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 6312 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 7 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4 7 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 1 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4756 4748 4740 4732 4724 4716 4708 4700 47014709471747254733474147494757484948484856 48 5 9 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 24 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4825 4819 4817 4807 4801 48004806481248184824 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 68 0 0 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 2 4 48 1 8 48 1 2 48 0 0 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 40 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 0 1 48 0 7 69 3 4 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 1 3 68 2 1 50 5 0 50 2 4 70 1 5 67 0 2 67 0 8 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 0 2 68 0 8 51 2 3 51 1 7 67 0 6 67 0 8 67 1 5 67 2 1 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 0 8 68 0 2 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 1 5 68 2 1 68 1 0 69 2 8 70 0 2 68 2 8 68 3 4 68 3 4 68 1 6 69 0 8 54 54 67 1 5 47 5 6 67 0 7 67 2 1 6 7 2 7 67 3 3 69 3 5 6 9 2 9 70 0 7 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 50 0 2 69 1 8 6 9 2 6 50 0 1 69 1 4 6 9 1 0 68 1 2 6 8 2 0 6 8 2 8 67 3 0 67 3 6 6 7 2 2 6 7 1 6 6 7 0 4 67 0 5 67 1 1 67 1 7 67 2 3 67 2 9 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 1 3 49 5 6 49 5 0 49 4 4 49 3 8 68 1 2 68 0 6 68 0 0 67 2 8 67 2 2 67 1 6 67 1 0 67 0 4 49 5 7 49 5 1 69 1 7 69 2 3 69 2 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 25 70 2 4 70 1 8 70 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 69 2 8 69 2 2 69 1 6 49 4 5 49 3 9 70 2 2 70 1 6 70 1 0 54 69 2 3 69 1 6 69 2 2 54 6 9 1 1 68 2 8 68 2 7 54 4957 6313 6324 65 0 4 65 2 0 65 2 6 66 0 0 66 0 2 66 0 7 66 0 1 65 2 9 48 4 0 64 0 9 64 1 5 64 0 1 6329 632563156305 70 2 5 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 69 2 1 6 9 2 7 69 0 1 69 0 9 68 2 9 68 2 3 68 1 7 67 0 0 68 0 7 6 8 1 1 46 5 6 4 6 5 7 46 5 6 46 5 7 66 1 5 46 5 0 66 0 1 66 0 7 65 3 5 65 2 9 65 1 1 65 1 7 65 0 5 65 0 1 64 2 1 64 2 5 M a p D o c u m e n t : ( S : \ A E \ C \ C r y s t \ 1 1 7 0 3 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ 8 _ 1 1 _ L o c a t i o n M a p _ L a n d s c a p e . m x d ) 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 1 - - 1 0 : 4 2 : 4 2 A M O 0 400 200 FeetFILE NO.CRYST117030 FIGURE 1 PH A S E 1 2 PH A S E 1 2 LO C A T I O N M A P LO C A T I O N M A P Le g e n d Pr o j e c t L i m i t s Ar e a N o t i n S t u d y Ci t y L i m i t s Ci t y o f N e w H o p e H a m p s h i r e A v e N K e n t u c A v e J e r s e A v e 4 7 t h A v e N I d a h o A v e L o u i s i a A v e N e v a d a A v e N F a i r v i e w A v e N 4 8 t h A v e N C o r v a l l i s A v e N L o u i s i a n a A v e N 5 1 s t P l N J e r s e y A v e N J e r s e y A v e N Douglas Dr NEdgewood Ave N 4 9 t h A v e N 5 0 t h A v e N 5 1 s t P l N M a r y l a n d A v e N Edgewood Ave N G e o r g i a A v e N K e n t u c k y A v e N F l o r i d a A v e N O r e g o n A v e N O r e g o n A v e N I d a h o A v e N C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Fo r e s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Glen Havens Memorial Gardens Cementery Crystal Community Center Ev e r g r e e n Mo n t e s s o r i Sc h o o l Ne w H o p e I c e A r e n a 4623 72 1 3 72 2 5 51 5 5 51 5 3 68 0 5 68 1 1 6 8 1 7 68 2 3 69 0 1 6 9 0 7 6 9 1 3 69 1 9 70 0 5 70 1 1 7 0 1 7 70 2 3 66 3 5 67 0 9 67 1 5 67 2 1 67 2 9 64 1 9 64 2 5 64 3 1 65 0 3 65 0 9 65 1 5 65 2 1 65 2 7 66 0 5 66 1 1 66 1 7 66 2 3 66 2 9 54 54 54 69 0 1 72 0 5 7 1 3 3 7 1 2 7 7 1 2 1 7 1 1 3 7 1 0 5 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 70 0 7 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 2 8 69 0 6 6 9 0 0 69 1 8 69 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 7 0 2 4 46 2 0 70 0 1 69 1 9 69 1 1 69 0 7 46 1 8 68 2 1 68 1 5 68 0 9 68 0 1 70 1 5 54 54 46 2 1 64 2 9 64 1 7 4625 6315 6321 6401 64 0 9 65 1 9 65 2 5 66 0 1 66 0 7 66 1 3 46 2 8 4649 4641 46336318 6324 6400 64 0 6 64 1 6 64 1 0 64 2 8 64 2 2 65 0 0 6 5 0 6 65 1 8 65 1 2 65 2 4 66 0 0 66 1 2 66 0 6 66 2 4 6 6 1 8 64 0 7 65 1 3 65 0 7 65 0 1 5213 5241 510054 4720 471647244725 4717 4716 4702 6212 6206 6200 6118 6112 61064800 462246304651464546394629 46234628464046506215610161076113 6119 4640 46344641 4635 4629 65 1 5 51 4 7 51 3 9 51 4 0 5136 5126 4909 490163055009500163226400 6406 64 0 7 6401 6321 63115153514651495131512551095115511663285103 64 1 0 6 4 0 2 51 0 2 51 0 8 51 1 4 51 1 5 51 2 8 51 2 2 51 2 7 51 4 1 51 5 0 51 4 4 51 2 5 51 3 1 51 1 9 51 0 9 65 0 0 65 3 0 65 1 4 51 0 2 6 6 1 8 6 6 0 8 51 2 4 51 3 2 51 4 0 54 64 1 5 64 2 5 65 0 5 65 1 5 65 2 1 6 5 3 1 6 6 0 3 6 6 1 1 66 1 9 6 6 2 1 66 2 4 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 0 65 2 4 66 0 6 6 6 0 0 65 1 8 65 1 2 50 0 9 6 4 2 4 6 4 2 0 6321 6327 6401 64 0 9 6 4 1 7 64 2 5 64 2 8 64 2 0 6 4 1 2 6 4 0 4 6 3 3 0 66 1 3 66 1 9 66 2 7 66 2 6 66 1 8 66 1 2 66 0 0 54 65 1 1 4 9 5 7 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 4 73 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 4841 4833 48324840 47 2 5 47 1 7 65 0 0 6 5 0 8 65 2 0 47 2 0 47 2 4 47 0 1 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 6312 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 7 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4 7 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 1 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4756 4748 4740 4732 4724 4716 4708 4700 47014709471747254733474147494757484948484856 48 5 9 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 24 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4825 4819 4817 4807 4801 48004806481248184824 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 68 0 0 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 2 4 48 1 8 48 1 2 48 0 0 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 40 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 0 1 48 0 7 69 3 4 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 1 3 68 2 1 50 5 0 50 2 4 70 1 5 67 0 2 67 0 8 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 0 2 68 0 8 51 2 3 51 1 7 67 0 6 67 0 8 67 1 5 67 2 1 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 0 8 68 0 2 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 1 5 68 2 1 68 1 0 69 2 8 70 0 2 68 2 8 68 3 4 68 3 4 68 1 6 69 0 8 54 54 67 1 5 47 5 6 67 0 7 67 2 1 6 7 2 7 67 3 3 69 3 5 6 9 2 9 70 0 7 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 50 0 2 69 1 8 6 9 2 6 50 0 1 69 1 4 6 9 1 0 68 1 2 6 8 2 0 6 8 2 8 67 3 0 67 3 6 6 7 2 2 6 7 1 6 6 7 0 4 67 0 5 67 1 1 67 1 7 67 2 3 67 2 9 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 1 3 49 5 6 49 5 0 49 4 4 49 3 8 68 1 2 68 0 6 68 0 0 67 2 8 67 2 2 67 1 6 67 1 0 67 0 4 49 5 7 49 5 1 69 1 7 69 2 3 69 2 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 25 70 2 4 70 1 8 70 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 69 2 8 69 2 2 69 1 6 49 4 5 49 3 9 70 2 2 70 1 6 70 1 0 54 69 2 3 69 1 6 69 2 2 54 6 9 1 1 68 2 8 68 2 7 54 4957 6313 6324 65 0 4 65 2 0 65 2 6 66 0 0 66 0 2 66 0 7 66 0 1 65 2 9 48 4 0 64 0 9 64 1 5 64 0 1 6329 632563156305 70 2 5 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 69 2 1 6 9 2 7 69 0 1 69 0 9 68 2 9 68 2 3 68 1 7 67 0 0 68 0 7 6 8 1 1 46 5 6 4 6 5 7 46 5 6 46 5 7 66 1 5 46 5 0 66 0 1 66 0 7 65 3 5 65 2 9 65 1 1 65 1 7 65 0 5 65 0 1 64 2 1 64 2 5 M a p D o c u m e n t : ( S : \ A E \ C \ C r y s t \ 1 1 7 0 3 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ 8 _ 1 1 _ S t r e e t S u m m a r y _ L a n d s c a p e 2 . m x d ) 8 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 1 - - 1 : 0 0 : 0 7 P M O 0 400 200 FeetFILE NO.CRYST117030 FIGURE 2 PH A S E 1 2 PH A S E 1 2 ST R E E T S U M M A R Y ST R E E T S U M M A R Y Le g e n d Ex i s t i n g S i d e w a l k Ha l f S t r e e t A s s e s s m e n t R a t e Fu l l S t r e e t A s s e s s m e n t R a t e Re i n c o r p o r a t e E x i s t i n g S i d e w a l k i n t o P r o j e c t Re m o v e a n d R e p l a c e B o u l e v a r d S t e p s Re m o v e B o u l e v a r d T r e e s Pr o j e c t L i m i t s Ar e a N o t i n S t u d y Ci t y o f N e w H o p e Ci t y L i m i t s Re m o v e a n d R e p l a c e R e t a i n i n g W a l l Pr o p o s e d B o u l e v a r d R e t a i n i n g W a l l Pr o p o s e d S i d e w a l k MS A F u l l S t r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n Re m o v e a n d R e p l a c e S i d e w a l k No S t r e e t A s s e s s m e n t R a t e Op t i o n a l S i d e w a l k L o c a t i o n 3 3% LINE /CROWN PROFILE AREA 2' REACTION 6" TOPSOIL ROW ROW60' (EX.) WALK VARIES 1 CL FACE TO FACE SEE INSET 32' PARKING 3% DRIVE LANE 11'8' DRIVE LANE 11' ROW 3' 5' 0.5' PROPOSED B618 CONC CURB & GUTTER & SOD 2%2% CL FACE TO FACE 32' 14' PARKING 3% DRIVE LANE 3% 5'11'8' DRIVE LANE 11'LINE /CROWN PROFILE 3' WALK AREA 2' REACTION 5' 0.5'13.5' ROW ROW60' & SOD 6" TOPSOIL SEE INSET PROPOSED B618 CONC CURB & GUTTER PHASE 12 2%3% FACE TO FACE SEE INSET 3% DRIVE LANE CURB & GUTTER 5'8' DRIVE LANE LINE /CROWN PROFILE 0.5' 5' BUFFER 12'12' SHOULDER OR PARKING CURB AND GUTTER 37' 49TH AVENUE (EX.) WALK VARIES 5' LOUISIANA AVENUE 2%2% FACE TO FACE 32' 14' PARKING 3% DRIVE LANE 3% 5'11'8' DRIVE LANE 11' ROW LINE /CROWN PROFILE 3' WALK AREA 2' REACTION 5' 0.5'13.5' ROWROW60' & SOD 6" TOPSOIL SEE INSET PROPOSED B618 CONC CURB & GUTTER 5GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 4 BIT. TACK COAT 1.5" TYPE SP WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 10" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE ON 49TH AVENUE 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 FAIRVIEW AVENUE EAST OF FLORIDA AVENUE = 12" 49TH AVENUE WEST OF MARYLAND AVENUE = 30" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW LC FAIRVIEW AVENUE 47TH AVENUE (LOUISIANA AVENUE TO HAMPSHIRE AVENUE)47TH AVENUE (HAMPSHIRE AVENUE TO DOUGLAS DRIVE) ROW EXISTING B618 CONC PROPOSED CONCRETE 3' ROW CL 2" TYPE SP WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SELECT GRANULAR BORROW LOCATIONS: SUBGRADE EXCAVATION AND 2 3 1 2 3 4 12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW ON 49TH AVENUE 5 AS NECESSARY AS A FIELD DECISION 49TH AVENUE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WILL BE INSTALLED ON: TYPICAL SECTION - MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET RECONSTRUCTION 13.5'14' 47TH AND LOUISIANA AVENUES 3" TYPE SP WEARING COURSE MIXTURE ON 47TH AND LOUISIANA AVENUES 12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE ON FILE NO. CRYST 117030 $ F I LE $ $ D A TE $ FIGURE 4 TYPICAL SECTION - LOCAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION 4" DRAIN TILE4" DRAIN TILE 6 6 2 1 5 5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEE FIGURE 8 FOR LOCATIONS 6 PHASE 12 AND GUTTER CONCRETE CURB PROPOSED B618 AND VARIES 60' 2% ROWROW AS NECESSARY AS A FIELD DECISION LOUISIANA AVENUE NORTH OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE NEVADA AVENUE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WILL BE INSTALLED ON: 7 7 8 8 9 9 12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 4 3 BIT. TACK COAT 6" FULL-DEPTH RECYCLED AGGREGATE BASE 2" TYPE LV NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 1.5" TYPE LV WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 3%3% 15'13' CL SEE INSET FACE TO FACE 30' WALK 5' & SOD 6" TOPSOIL 2' REACTION AREA 6" TOPSOIL 2% WALK 5' & SOD AND GUTTER CONCRETE CURB EXISTING B618 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE NORTH OF 50TH AVENUE 48TH AVENUE EAST OF EDGEWOOD AVENUE SELECT GRANULAR BORROW WILL BE INSTALLED ON NEVADA AVENUE ONLY HAMPSHIRE AVENUE NORTH OF 51ST PLACE 150' NORTH OF 50TH AVENUE JERSEY AVENUE BETWEEN CORVALLIS AVENUE AND 27' FACE TO FACE LOCATIONS: AND HAMPSHIRE AVENUES ONLY (OPTIONAL) 5' WALK ON 48TH AVENUE BETWEEN LOUISIANA AND 48TH AVENUES ONLY (OPTIONAL) 5' WALK ON HAMPSHIRE AVENUE BETWEEN 47TH SELECT GRANULAR BORROW LOCATIONS: 12" OF SUBGRADE EXCAVATION AND 2 3 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE BETWEEN 47TH AND 48TH AVENUES 48TH AVENUE BETWEEN HAMPSHIRE AND LOUISIANA AVENUES 3" TYPE LV NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE ON:1 LOUISIANA AVENUE NORTH OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE NEVADA AVENUE 8" FULL-DEPTH RECYCLED AGGREGATE BASE ON: 4 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE BETWEEN 47TH AND 48TH AVENUES 48TH AVENUE BETWEEN HAMPSHIRE AND LOUISIANA AVENUES 12" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 ON: FILE NO. CRYST 117030 $ F I LE $ $ D A TE $ FIGURE H a m p s h i r e A v e N K e n t u c A v e J e r s e A v e 4 7 t h A v e N I d a h o A v e L o u i s i a A v e N e v a d a A v e N F a i r v i e w A v e N 4 8 t h A v e N C o r v a l l i s A v e N L o u i s i a n a A v e N 5 1 s t P l N J e r s e y A v e N J e r s e y A v e N Douglas Dr NEdgewood Ave N 4 9 t h A v e N 5 0 t h A v e N 5 1 s t P l N M a r y l a n d A v e N Edgewood Ave N G e o r g i a A v e N K e n t u c k y A v e N F l o r i d a A v e N O r e g o n A v e N O r e g o n A v e N I d a h o A v e N C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Fo r e s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Glen Havens Memorial Gardens Cementery Crystal Community Center Ev e r g r e e n Mo n t e s s o r i Sc h o o l Ne w H o p e Ic e A r e n a 4623 72 1 3 72 2 5 51 5 5 51 5 3 68 0 5 68 1 1 6 8 1 7 68 2 3 69 0 1 6 9 0 7 6 9 1 3 69 1 9 70 0 5 70 1 1 7 0 1 7 70 2 3 66 3 5 67 0 9 67 1 5 67 2 1 67 2 9 64 1 9 64 2 5 64 3 1 65 0 3 65 0 9 65 1 5 65 2 1 65 2 7 66 0 5 66 1 1 66 1 7 66 2 3 66 2 9 54 54 54 69 0 1 72 0 5 7 1 3 3 7 1 2 7 7 1 2 1 7 1 1 3 7 1 0 5 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 70 0 7 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 2 8 69 0 6 6 9 0 0 69 1 8 69 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 7 0 2 4 46 2 0 70 0 1 69 1 9 69 1 1 69 0 7 46 1 8 68 2 1 68 1 5 68 0 9 68 0 1 70 1 5 54 54 46 2 1 64 2 9 64 1 7 4625 6315 6321 6401 64 0 9 65 1 9 65 2 5 66 0 1 66 0 7 66 1 3 46 2 8 4649 4641 46336318 6324 6400 64 0 6 64 1 6 64 1 0 64 2 8 64 2 2 65 0 0 6 5 0 6 65 1 8 65 1 2 65 2 4 66 0 0 66 1 2 66 0 6 66 2 4 6 6 1 8 64 0 7 65 1 3 65 0 7 65 0 1 5213 5241 510054 4720 471647244725 4717 4716 4702 6212 6206 6200 6118 6112 61064800 462246304651464546394629 46234628464046506215610161076113 6119 4640 46344641 4635 4629 65 1 5 51 4 7 51 3 9 51 4 0 5136 5126 4909 490163055009500163226400 6406 64 0 7 6401 6321 63115153514651495131512551095115511663285103 64 1 0 6 4 0 2 51 0 2 51 0 8 51 1 4 51 1 5 51 2 8 51 2 2 51 2 7 51 4 1 51 5 0 51 4 4 51 2 5 51 3 1 51 1 9 51 0 9 65 0 0 65 3 0 65 1 4 51 0 2 6 6 1 8 6 6 0 8 51 2 4 51 3 2 51 4 0 54 64 1 5 64 2 5 65 0 5 65 1 5 65 2 1 6 5 3 1 6 6 0 3 6 6 1 1 66 1 9 6 6 2 1 66 2 4 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 0 65 2 4 66 0 6 6 6 0 0 65 1 8 65 1 2 50 0 9 6 4 2 4 6 4 2 0 6321 6327 6401 64 0 9 6 4 1 7 64 2 5 64 2 8 64 2 0 6 4 1 2 6 4 0 4 6 3 3 0 66 1 3 66 1 9 66 2 7 66 2 6 66 1 8 66 1 2 66 0 0 54 65 1 1 4 9 5 7 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 4 73 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 4841 4833 48324840 47 2 5 47 1 7 65 0 0 6 5 0 8 65 2 0 47 2 0 47 2 4 47 0 1 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 6312 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 7 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4 7 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 1 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4756 4748 4740 4732 4724 4716 4708 4700 47014709471747254733474147494757484948484856 48 5 9 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 24 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4825 4819 4817 4807 4801 48004806481248184824 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 68 0 0 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 2 4 48 1 8 48 1 2 48 0 0 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 40 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 0 1 48 0 7 69 3 4 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 1 3 68 2 1 50 5 0 50 2 4 70 1 5 67 0 2 67 0 8 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 0 2 68 0 8 51 2 3 51 1 7 67 0 6 67 0 8 67 1 5 67 2 1 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 0 8 68 0 2 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 1 5 68 2 1 68 1 0 69 2 8 70 0 2 68 2 8 68 3 4 68 3 4 68 1 6 69 0 8 54 54 67 1 5 47 5 6 67 0 7 67 2 1 6 7 2 7 67 3 3 69 3 5 6 9 2 9 70 0 7 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 50 0 2 69 1 8 6 9 2 6 50 0 1 69 1 4 6 9 1 0 68 1 2 6 8 2 0 6 8 2 8 67 3 0 67 3 6 6 7 2 2 6 7 1 6 6 7 0 4 67 0 5 67 1 1 67 1 7 67 2 3 67 2 9 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 1 3 49 5 6 49 5 0 49 4 4 49 3 8 68 1 2 68 0 6 68 0 0 67 2 8 67 2 2 67 1 6 67 1 0 67 0 4 49 5 7 49 5 1 69 1 7 69 2 3 69 2 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 25 70 2 4 70 1 8 70 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 69 2 8 69 2 2 69 1 6 49 4 5 49 3 9 70 2 2 70 1 6 70 1 0 54 69 2 3 69 1 6 69 2 2 54 6 9 1 1 68 2 8 68 2 7 54 4957 6313 6324 65 0 4 65 2 0 65 2 6 66 0 0 66 0 2 66 0 7 66 0 1 65 2 9 48 4 0 64 0 9 64 1 5 64 0 1 6329 632563156305 70 2 5 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 69 2 1 6 9 2 7 69 0 1 69 0 9 68 2 9 68 2 3 68 1 7 67 0 0 68 0 7 6 8 1 1 46 5 6 4 6 5 7 46 5 6 46 5 7 66 1 5 46 5 0 66 0 1 66 0 7 65 3 5 65 2 9 65 1 1 65 1 7 65 0 5 65 0 1 64 2 1 64 2 5 M a p D o c u m e n t : ( S : \ A E \ C \ C r y s t \ 1 1 7 0 3 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ 8 _ 1 1 _ G a s M a i n _ L a n d s c a p e . m x d ) 8 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 1 - - 1 2 : 2 5 : 4 4 P M O 0 400 200 FeetFILE NO.CRYST117030 FIGURE 5 PH A S E 1 2 PH A S E 1 2 FA L L 2 0 1 1 G A S M A I N R E P L A C E M E N T FA L L 2 0 1 1 G A S M A I N R E P L A C E M E N T Le g e n d Pr o j e c t L i m i t s Ar e a N o t i n S t u d y Ci t y L i m i t s Ci t y o f N e w H o p e Fa l l 2 0 1 1 G a s M a i n Re p l a c e m e n t H a m p s h i r e A v e N K e n t u c A v e J e r s e A v e 4 7 t h A v e N I d a h o A v e L o u i s i a A v e N e v a d a A v e N F a i r v i e w A v e N 4 8 t h A v e N C o r v a l l i s A v e N L o u i s i a n a A v e N 5 1 s t P l N J e r s e y A v e N J e r s e y A v e N Douglas Dr NEdgewood Ave N 4 9 t h A v e N 5 0 t h A v e N 5 1 s t P l N M a r y l a n d A v e N Edgewood Ave N G e o r g i a A v e N K e n t u c k y A v e N F l o r i d a A v e N O r e g o n A v e N O r e g o n A v e N I d a h o A v e N C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Fo r e s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Glen Havens Memorial Gardens Cementery Crystal Community Center Ev e r g r e e n Mo n t e s s o r i Sc h o o l Ne w H o p e I c e A r e n a 4623 72 1 3 72 2 5 51 5 5 51 5 3 68 0 5 68 1 1 6 8 1 7 68 2 3 69 0 1 6 9 0 7 6 9 1 3 69 1 9 70 0 5 70 1 1 7 0 1 7 70 2 3 66 3 5 67 0 9 67 1 5 67 2 1 67 2 9 64 1 9 64 2 5 64 3 1 65 0 3 65 0 9 65 1 5 65 2 1 65 2 7 66 0 5 66 1 1 66 1 7 66 2 3 66 2 9 54 54 54 69 0 1 72 0 5 7 1 3 3 7 1 2 7 7 1 2 1 7 1 1 3 7 1 0 5 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 70 0 7 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 2 8 69 0 6 6 9 0 0 69 1 8 69 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 7 0 2 4 46 2 0 70 0 1 69 1 9 69 1 1 69 0 7 46 1 8 68 2 1 68 1 5 68 0 9 68 0 1 70 1 5 54 54 46 2 1 64 2 9 64 1 7 4625 6315 6321 6401 64 0 9 65 1 9 65 2 5 66 0 1 66 0 7 66 1 3 46 2 8 4649 4641 46336318 6324 6400 64 0 6 64 1 6 64 1 0 64 2 8 64 2 2 65 0 0 6 5 0 6 65 1 8 65 1 2 65 2 4 66 0 0 66 1 2 66 0 6 66 2 4 6 6 1 8 64 0 7 65 1 3 65 0 7 65 0 1 5213 5241 510054 4720 471647244725 4717 4716 4702 6212 6206 6200 6118 6112 61064800 462246304651464546394629 46234628464046506215610161076113 6119 4640 46344641 4635 4629 65 1 5 51 4 7 51 3 9 51 4 0 5136 5126 4909 490163055009500163226400 6406 64 0 7 6401 6321 63115153514651495131512551095115511663285103 64 1 0 6 4 0 2 51 0 2 51 0 8 51 1 4 51 1 5 51 2 8 51 2 2 51 2 7 51 4 1 51 5 0 51 4 4 51 2 5 51 3 1 51 1 9 51 0 9 65 0 0 65 3 0 65 1 4 51 0 2 6 6 1 8 6 6 0 8 51 2 4 51 3 2 51 4 0 54 64 1 5 64 2 5 65 0 5 65 1 5 65 2 1 6 5 3 1 6 6 0 3 6 6 1 1 66 1 9 6 6 2 1 66 2 4 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 0 65 2 4 66 0 6 6 6 0 0 65 1 8 65 1 2 50 0 9 6 4 2 4 6 4 2 0 6321 6327 6401 64 0 9 6 4 1 7 64 2 5 64 2 8 64 2 0 6 4 1 2 6 4 0 4 6 3 3 0 66 1 3 66 1 9 66 2 7 66 2 6 66 1 8 66 1 2 66 0 0 54 65 1 1 4 9 5 7 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 4 73 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 4841 4833 48324840 47 2 5 47 1 7 65 0 0 6 5 0 8 65 2 0 47 2 0 47 2 4 47 0 1 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 6312 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 7 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4 7 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 1 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4756 4748 4740 4732 4724 4716 4708 4700 47014709471747254733474147494757484948484856 48 5 9 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 4 81 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4825 4819 4817 4807 4801 48004806481248184824 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 68 0 0 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 2 4 48 1 8 48 1 2 48 0 0 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4 84 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 0 1 48 0 7 69 3 4 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 1 3 68 2 1 50 5 0 50 2 4 70 1 5 67 0 2 67 0 8 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 0 2 68 0 8 51 2 3 51 1 7 67 0 6 67 0 8 67 1 5 67 2 1 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 0 8 68 0 2 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 1 5 68 2 1 68 1 0 69 2 8 70 0 2 68 2 8 68 3 4 68 3 4 68 1 6 69 0 8 54 54 67 1 5 47 5 6 67 0 7 67 2 1 6 7 2 7 67 3 3 69 3 5 6 9 2 9 70 0 7 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 50 0 2 69 1 8 6 9 2 6 50 0 1 69 1 4 6 9 1 0 68 1 2 6 8 2 0 6 8 2 8 67 3 0 67 3 6 6 7 2 2 6 7 1 6 6 7 0 4 67 0 5 67 1 1 67 1 7 67 2 3 67 2 9 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 1 3 49 5 6 49 5 0 49 4 4 49 3 8 68 1 2 68 0 6 68 0 0 67 2 8 67 2 2 67 1 6 67 1 0 67 0 4 49 5 7 49 5 1 69 1 7 69 2 3 69 2 9 70 0 1 70 07 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 2 5 70 2 4 70 1 8 70 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 69 2 8 69 2 2 69 1 6 49 4 5 49 3 9 70 2 2 70 1 6 70 1 0 54 69 2 3 69 1 6 69 2 2 54 6 9 1 1 68 2 8 68 2 7 54 4957 6313 6324 65 0 4 65 2 0 65 2 6 66 0 0 66 0 2 66 0 7 66 0 1 65 2 9 48 4 0 64 0 9 64 1 5 64 0 1 6329 632563156305 70 2 5 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 69 2 1 6 9 2 7 69 0 1 69 0 9 68 2 9 68 2 3 68 1 7 67 0 0 68 0 7 6 8 1 1 46 5 6 4 6 5 7 46 5 6 46 5 7 66 1 5 46 5 0 66 0 1 66 0 7 65 3 5 65 2 9 65 1 1 65 1 7 65 0 5 65 0 1 64 2 1 64 2 5 M a p D o c u m e n t : ( S : \ A E \ C \ C r y s t \ 1 1 7 0 3 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ 8 _ 1 1 _ C u r b S u m m a r y _ L a n d s c a p e . m x d ) 9 / 9 / 2 0 1 1 - - 8 : 3 9 : 2 0 A M O 0 400 200 FeetFILE NO.CRYST117030 FIGURE 6 PH A S E 1 2 PH A S E 1 2 CU R B S U M M A R Y CU R B S U M M A R Y Le g e n d No C u r b A s s e s s m e n t $1 8 . 8 8 P e r F r o n t F o o t C u r b A s s e s s m e n t $4 . 9 1 P e r F r o n t F o o t C u r b A s s e s s m e n t $1 8 . 8 8 P e r F r o n t F o o t C u r b A s s e s s m e n t St r e e t w i t h E x i s t i n g " D " C u r b Re p l a c e w i t h B 6 1 8 C u r b St r e e t w i t h E x i s t i n g B 6 1 8 C u r b St r e e t w i t h N o E x i s t i n g C u r b Pr o j e c t L i m i t s Ar e a N o t i n S t u d y Ci t y o f N e w H o p e Ci t y L i m i t s !(")!(")") !(") ")") ") !( !(") !( !( !( !(")") !( ") ") !(!(!(")")!(")")!(")")")")")!(!(!(")")")")")") !(!(") ")") ") !( !( !(") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") !(")") ") !(")") ")") !( ")") ")!( ")") ")")")") ")")!( !(!( !( ")") ")!( ")") ") ")") ") !(") !(!(!( ")") !( !( !(!(!(") ")") ")!( ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")!(")")")")!(")")")")")")")")!( H a m p s h i r e A v e N K e n t u c A v e J e r s e A v e 4 7 t h A v e N I d a h o A v e L o u i s i a A v e N e v a d a A v e N F a i r v i e w A v e N 4 8 t h A v e N C o r v a l l i s A v e N L o u i s i a n a A v e N 5 1 s t P l N J e r s e y A v e N J e r s e y A v e N Douglas Dr NEdgewood Ave N 4 9 t h A v e N 5 0 t h A v e N 5 1 s t P l N M a r y l a n d A v e N Edgewood Ave N G e o r g i a A v e N K e n t u c k y A v e N F l o r i d a A v e N O r e g o n A v e N O r e g o n A v e N I d a h o A v e N C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d "" "" " " " " "" " " " " "" " " " Fo r e s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Glen Havens Memorial Gardens Cementery Crystal Community Center Ev e r g r e e n Mo n t e s s o r i Sc h o o l Ne w H o p e I c e A r e n a 54 54 54 66 2 9 66 2 3 66 1 7 66 1 1 66 0 5 65 2 7 65 2 1 65 1 5 65 0 9 65 0 3 64 2 5 67 2 9 67 2 1 67 1 5 67 0 9 66 3 5 70 2 3 70 1 7 70 1 1 70 0 5 69 1 9 69 1 3 69 0 7 69 0 1 68 2 3 68 1 7 68 1 1 68 0 5 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 1 3 68 2 1 50 5 0 50 2 4 70 1 5 51 5 3 67 0 2 67 0 8 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 0 2 68 0 8 51 2 3 51 1 7 67 0 6 67 0 8 67 1 5 67 2 1 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 0 8 68 0 2 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 1 5 68 2 1 68 1 0 69 2 8 70 0 2 68 2 8 68 3 4 68 3 4 68 1 6 69 0 8 54 54 67 1 5 6 7 0 7 67 2 1 6 7 2 7 67 3 3 69 3 5 6 9 2 9 70 0 7 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 50 0 2 69 1 8 69 3 4 6 9 2 6 50 0 1 69 1 4 69 1 0 68 1 2 6 8 2 0 6 8 2 8 67 3 0 67 3 6 6 7 2 2 6 7 1 6 6 7 0 4 67 0 5 67 1 1 67 1 7 67 2 3 67 2 9 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 1 3 49 5 6 49 5 0 49 4 4 49 3 8 68 1 2 68 0 6 68 0 0 67 2 8 67 2 2 67 1 6 67 1 0 67 0 4 49 5 7 49 5 1 69 1 7 69 2 3 69 2 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 2 5 70 2 4 70 1 8 70 1 2 70 0 6 7 00 0 69 2 8 69 2 2 69 1 6 49 4 5 49 3 9 51 5 5 70 2 2 70 1 6 70 1 0 54 69 2 3 69 1 6 69 2 2 69 0 1 69 1 1 68 2 8 68 2 7 54 4957 6313 6324 65 0 4 65 2 0 65 2 6 66 0 0 66 0 2 66 0 7 66 0 1 65 2 9 6 5 1 5 51 4 7 51 3 9 51 4 0 5136 5126 4909 49016305500950016312 6322 6400 6406 64 0 7 6401 6321 63115153514651495131512551095115511663285103 64 1 0 6 4 0 2 51 0 2 51 0 8 51 1 4 51 1 5 51 2 8 51 2 2 51 2 7 51 4 1 51 5 0 51 4 4 51 2 5 51 3 1 51 1 9 51 0 9 65 0 0 65 3 0 65 1 4 51 0 2 6 6 1 8 6 6 0 8 51 2 4 51 3 2 51 4 0 54 64 1 5 64 2 5 65 0 5 65 1 5 65 2 1 6 5 3 1 6 6 0 3 6 6 1 1 66 1 9 6 6 2 1 66 2 4 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 0 65 2 4 66 0 6 6 6 0 0 65 1 8 65 1 2 50 0 9 6 4 2 4 6 4 2 0 6321 6327 6401 64 0 9 6 4 1 7 64 2 5 64 28 64 2 0 6 4 1 2 6 4 0 4 6 3 3 0 66 1 3 66 1 9 66 2 7 66 2 6 66 1 8 66 1 2 66 0 0 54 65 1 1 49 5 7 72 2 5 7 2 1 3 72 0 5 7 1 3 3 7 1 2 7 7 1 2 1 7 1 1 3 7 1 0 5 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 46 5 7 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 46 5 6 46 5 7 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 46 5 6 4841 4833 48324840 47 2 5 47 1 7 65 0 0 6 5 0 8 65 2 0 47 2 0 47 2 4 47 0 1 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 7 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4 7 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 72 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 1 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4756 4748 4740 4732 4724 4716 4708 4700 47014709471747254733474147494757484948484856 48 5 9 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4825 4819 4817 4807 4801 48004806481248184824 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 68 0 0 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 49 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 2 4 48 1 8 48 1 2 48 0 0 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 70 0 7 68 1 1 6 8 0 7 67 0 0 68 1 7 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 2 3 68 2 8 68 2 9 69 0 6 69 0 9 69 0 0 69 0 1 69 1 8 69 2 7 69 1 2 69 2 1 70 0 6 70 0 7 70 0 0 70 0 1 70 1 9 70 1 3 70 2 5 70 1 2 70 1 8 70 2 4 46 2 0 70 0 1 69 1 9 69 1 1 69 0 1 69 0 7 46 1 8 68 2 1 68 1 5 68 0 9 68 0 1 70 1 5 54 54 46 2 1 64 2 9 64 1 7 4625 6315 6321 6401 64 0 9 65 1 9 65 2 5 66 0 1 66 0 7 66 1 3 46 2 8 6305 4649 4641 4633631563186325632464006329 64 0 1 64 0 6 64 1 6 64 1 5 64 0 9 64 1 0 64 2 8 64 2 5 64 2 2 64 2 1 65 0 0 65 0 1 65 0 5 65 0 6 65 1 7 65 1 8 65 1 2 65 1 1 65 2 4 65 2 9 66 0 0 65 3 5 66 0 7 66 1 2 66 0 1 66 0 6 66 2 4 66 1 8 64 0 7 65 1 3 65 0 7 65 0 1 46 5 0 66 1 5 5213 5241 510054 4720 471647244725 4717 4716 4702 6212 6206 6200 6118 6112 61064800 462246304651464546394629 4623462846404650621561061076113611946404634464146354629 4623 M a p D o c u m e n t : ( S : \ A E \ C \ C r y s t \ 1 1 7 0 3 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ 8 _ 1 1 _ S t o r m _ L a n d s c a p e . m x d ) 9 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 1 - - 7 : 1 0 : 1 5 A M O 0 400 200 FeetFILE NO.CRYST117030 FIGURE 7 PH A S E 1 2 PH A S E 1 2 ST O R M S E W E R ST O R M S E W E R Le g e n d Pr o j e c t L i m i t s Ar e a N o t i n S t u d y Ci t y L i m i t s Ci t y o f N e w H o p e Ex i s t i n g S t o r m S e w e r Ex i s t i n g C a t c h B a s i n ") Pr o p o s e d S t o r m S e w e r Pr o p o s e d C a t c h B a s i n ") Re p l a c e E x i s t i n g C M St o r m S e w e r P i p e H a m p s h i r e A v e N K e n t u c A v e J e r s e A v e 4 7 t h A v e N I d a h o A v e L o u i s i a A v e N e v a d a A v e N F a i r v i e w A v e N 4 8 t h A v e N C o r v a l l i s A v e N L o u i s i a n a A v e N 5 1 s t P l N J e r s e y A v e N J e r s e y A v e N Douglas Dr NEdgewood Ave N 4 9 t h A v e N 5 0 t h A v e N 5 1 s t P l N M a r y l a n d A v e N Edgewood Ave N G e o r g i a A v e N K e n t u c k y A v e N F l o r i d a A v e N O r e g o n A v e N O r e g o n A v e N I d a h o A v e N C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d !(")!(")") !(") ")") ") !( !(") !( !( !( !(")") !( ") ") !(!(!(")")!(")")!(")")")")")!(!(!(")")")")")") !(!(") ")") ") !( !( !( ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") !( ")") ") !(")") ")") !( ")") ") !( ")") ")")")") ")") !( !(!( !( ")") ")!( ")") ") ")") ") !(") !(!(!( ")") !( !(!(!(") ")") ")!( ")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")")!(")")")")!(")")")")")")")")!( "" "" " "" " "" " " " " "" " " " Fo r e s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Glen Havens Memorial Gardens Cementery Crystal Community Center Ev e r g r e e n Mo n t e s s o r i Sc h o o l Ne w H o p e Ic e A r e n a 46 2 0 69 1 8 69 0 0 6 9 0 6 68 2 8 68 2 2 68 1 6 70 0 7 46 4 8 46 4 0 46 3 2 46 2 4 4 6 2 5 46 3 3 46 4 1 46 4 9 46 4 8 46 4 0 46 3 2 46 2 4 4 6 2 5 46 3 3 46 4 1 46 4 9 71 0 5 7 1 1 3 7 1 2 1 7 1 2 7 7 1 3 3 7 2 0 5 72 1 3 72 2 5 51 5 5 51 5 3 68 0 5 68 1 1 6 8 1 7 68 2 3 69 0 1 6 9 0 7 6 9 1 3 69 1 9 70 0 5 70 1 1 7 0 1 7 70 2 3 66 3 5 67 0 9 67 1 5 67 2 1 67 2 9 64 1 9 64 2 5 64 3 1 65 0 3 65 0 9 65 1 5 65 2 1 65 2 7 66 0 5 66 1 1 66 1 7 66 2 3 66 2 9 54 54 54 4623 69 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 7 0 2 4 70 0 1 69 1 9 69 1 1 69 0 1 69 0 7 46 1 8 68 2 1 68 1 5 68 0 9 68 0 1 70 1 5 54 54 46 2 1 64 2 9 64 1 7 4625 6315 6321 6401 64 0 9 65 1 9 65 2 5 66 0 1 66 0 7 66 1 3 46 2 8 4649 4641 46336318 6324 6400 64 0 6 64 1 6 64 1 0 64 2 8 64 2 2 65 0 0 6 5 0 6 65 1 8 65 1 2 65 2 4 66 0 0 66 1 2 66 0 6 66 2 4 6 6 1 8 64 0 7 65 1 3 65 0 7 65 0 1 5213 5241 510054 4720 471647244725 4717 4716 4702 6212 6206 6200 6118 6112 61064800 462246304651464546394629 46234628464046506215610161076113 6119 4640 46344641 4635 4629 70 0 0 69 2 8 69 2 2 69 1 6 49 4 5 49 3 9 70 2 2 70 1 6 70 1 0 54 69 2 3 69 1 6 69 2 2 54 69 1 1 68 2 8 54 4957 6324 65 0 4 65 2 0 65 2 6 66 0 0 66 0 2 66 0 7 66 0 1 65 2 9 65 1 5 51 4 7 51 3 9 51 4 0 5136 5126 4909 49016305500950016312 6322 6400 6406 64 0 7 6401 6321 63115153514651495131512551095115511663285103 64 1 0 6 4 0 2 51 0 2 51 0 8 51 1 4 51 1 5 51 2 8 51 2 2 51 2 7 51 4 1 51 5 0 51 4 4 51 2 5 51 3 1 51 1 9 51 0 9 65 0 0 65 3 0 65 1 4 51 0 2 6 6 1 8 6 6 0 8 51 2 4 51 3 2 51 4 0 54 64 1 5 64 2 5 65 0 5 65 1 5 65 2 1 6 5 3 1 6 6 0 3 6 6 1 1 66 1 9 6 6 2 1 66 2 4 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 0 65 2 4 66 0 6 6 6 0 0 65 1 8 65 1 2 50 0 9 6 4 2 4 6 4 2 0 6321 6327 6401 64 0 9 6 4 1 7 64 2 5 64 2 8 64 2 0 6 4 1 2 6 4 0 4 6 3 3 0 66 1 3 66 19 66 2 7 66 2 6 66 1 8 66 1 2 66 0 0 54 65 1 1 4 9 5 7 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 4841 4833 48324840 47 2 5 47 1 7 65 0 0 6 5 0 8 65 2 0 47 2 0 47 2 4 47 0 1 6313 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 7 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4 7 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 1 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 41 47 4 9 47 5 7 4756 4748 4740 4732 4724 4716 4708 4700 47014709471747254733474147494757484948484856 48 5 9 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4825 4819 4817 4807 4801 48004806481248184824 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 68 0 0 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 49 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 2 4 48 1 8 48 1 2 48 0 0 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 0 1 48 0 7 68 2 2 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 1 3 68 2 1 50 5 0 47 5 6 50 2 4 70 1 5 67 0 2 67 0 8 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 0 2 68 0 8 51 2 3 51 1 7 67 0 6 67 0 8 67 1 5 67 2 1 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 0 8 68 0 2 68 1 6 68 1 5 68 2 1 68 1 0 69 2 8 70 0 2 68 2 8 68 3 4 68 3 4 68 1 6 69 0 8 54 54 67 1 5 6 7 0 7 67 2 1 6 7 2 7 67 3 3 69 3 5 6 9 2 9 70 0 7 70 1 2 7 0 18 50 0 2 69 1 8 69 3 4 6 9 2 6 50 0 1 69 1 4 6 9 1 0 68 1 2 6 8 2 0 6 8 2 8 67 3 0 67 3 6 6 7 2 2 6 7 1 6 6 7 0 4 67 0 5 67 1 1 67 1 7 67 2 3 67 2 9 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 1 3 49 5 6 49 5 0 49 4 4 49 3 8 68 1 2 68 0 6 68 0 0 67 2 8 67 2 2 67 1 6 67 1 0 67 0 4 49 5 7 49 5 1 69 1 7 69 2 3 69 2 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 2 5 70 2 4 70 1 8 70 1 2 70 0 6 48 2 4 68 1 7 67 0 0 68 0 7 6 8 1 1 46 5 6 4 6 5 7 46 5 6 46 5 7 70 1 9 65 3 5 66 1 5 46 5 0 66 0 1 66 0 7 65 2 9 65 1 1 65 1 7 65 0 5 65 0 1 64 2 1 64 2 5 64 0 9 64 1 5 64 0 1 6329 632563156305 70 2 5 70 1 3 70 0 1 70 0 7 69 2 1 6 9 2 7 69 0 1 69 0 9 68 2 9 68 2 3 S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S M a p D o c u m e n t : ( S : \ A E \ C \ C r y s t \ 1 1 7 0 3 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ 8 _ 1 1 _ D r a i n T i l e _ R a i n G a r d e n _ L a n d s c a p e . m x d ) 8 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 1 - - 7 : 0 1 : 5 8 A M O 0 400 200 FeetFILE NO.CRYST117030 FIGURE 8 PH A S E 1 2 PH A S E 1 2 DR A I N T I L E / R A I N G A R D E N S DR A I N T I L E / R A I N G A R D E N S Le g e n d Ex i s t i n g a n d P r o p o s e d S t o r m S e w e r Ho u s e s R e p o r t i n g S t o r m o r G r o u n d Wa t e r P r o b l e m s Re s i d e n t s I n t e r e s t e d i n R a i n G a r d e n s Ho u s e s R e p o r t i n g T h e y H a v e a S u m p P u m p Pr o p o s e d D r a i n T i l e Pr o j e c t L i m i t s Ar e a N o t i n S t u d y Ci t y o f N e w H o p e Ci t y L i m i t s S H a m p s h i r e A v e N K e n t u c A v e J e r s e A v e 4 7 t h A v e N I d a h o A v e L o u i s i a A v e N e v a d a A v e N F a i r v i e w A v e N 4 8 t h A v e N C o r v a l l i s A v e N L o u i s i a n a A v e N 5 1 s t P l N J e r s e y A v e N J e r s e y A v e N Douglas Dr NEdgewood Ave N 4 9 t h A v e N 5 0 t h A v e N 5 1 s t P l N M a r y l a n d A v e N Edgewood Ave N G e o r g i a A v e N K e n t u c k y A v e N F l o r i d a A v e N O r e g o n A v e N O r e g o n A v e N I d a h o A v e N C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Fo r e s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Glen Havens Memorial Gardens Cementery Crystal Community Center Ev e r g r e e n Mo n t e s s o r i Sc h o o l Ne w H o p e Ic e A r e n a 4623 72 1 3 72 2 5 51 5 5 51 5 3 68 0 5 68 1 1 6 8 1 7 68 2 3 69 0 1 6 9 0 7 6 9 1 3 69 1 9 70 0 5 70 1 1 7 0 1 7 70 2 3 66 3 5 67 0 9 67 1 5 67 2 1 67 2 9 64 1 9 64 2 5 64 3 1 65 0 3 65 0 9 65 1 5 65 2 1 65 2 7 66 0 5 66 1 1 66 1 7 66 2 3 66 2 9 54 54 54 69 0 1 72 0 5 7 1 3 3 7 1 2 7 7 1 2 1 7 1 1 3 7 1 0 5 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 70 0 7 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 2 8 69 0 6 6 9 0 0 69 1 8 69 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 7 0 2 4 46 2 0 70 0 1 69 1 9 69 1 1 69 0 7 46 1 8 68 2 1 68 1 5 68 0 9 68 0 1 70 1 5 54 54 46 2 1 64 2 9 64 1 7 4625 6315 6321 6401 64 0 9 65 1 9 65 2 5 66 0 1 66 0 7 66 1 3 46 2 8 4649 4641 46336318 6324 6400 64 0 6 64 1 6 64 1 0 64 2 8 64 2 2 65 0 0 6 5 0 6 65 1 8 65 1 2 65 2 4 66 0 0 66 1 2 66 0 6 66 2 4 6 6 1 8 64 0 7 65 1 3 65 0 7 65 0 1 5213 5241 510054 4720 471647244725 4717 4716 4702 6212 6206 6200 6118 6112 61064800 462246304651464546394629 46234628464046506215610161076113 6119 4640 46344641 4635 4629 65 1 5 51 4 7 51 3 9 51 4 0 5136 5126 4909 490163055009500163226400 6406 64 0 7 6401 6321 63115153514651495131512551095115511663285103 64 1 0 6 4 0 2 51 0 2 51 0 8 51 1 4 51 1 5 51 2 8 51 2 2 51 2 7 51 4 1 51 5 0 51 4 4 51 2 5 51 3 1 51 1 9 51 0 9 65 0 0 65 3 0 65 1 4 51 0 2 6 6 1 8 6 6 0 8 51 2 4 51 3 2 51 4 0 54 64 1 5 64 2 5 65 0 5 65 1 5 65 2 1 6 5 3 1 6 6 0 3 6 6 1 1 66 1 9 6 6 2 1 66 2 4 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 0 65 2 4 66 0 6 6 6 0 0 65 1 8 65 1 2 50 0 9 6 4 2 4 6 4 2 0 6321 6327 6401 64 0 9 6 4 1 7 64 2 5 64 2 8 64 2 0 6 4 1 2 6 4 0 4 6 3 3 0 66 1 3 66 1 9 66 2 7 66 2 6 66 1 8 66 1 2 66 0 0 54 65 1 1 4 9 5 7 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 4 73 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 4841 4833 48324840 47 2 5 47 1 7 65 0 0 6 5 0 8 65 2 0 47 2 0 47 2 4 47 0 1 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 6312 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 7 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4 7 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 1 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4756 4748 4740 4732 4724 4716 4708 4700 47014709471747254733474147494757484948484856 48 5 9 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 24 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4825 4819 4817 4807 4801 48004806481248184824 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 68 0 0 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 2 4 48 1 8 48 1 2 48 0 0 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 40 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 0 1 48 0 7 69 3 4 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 1 3 68 2 1 50 5 0 50 2 4 70 1 5 67 0 2 67 0 8 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 0 2 68 0 8 51 2 3 51 1 7 67 0 6 67 0 8 67 1 5 67 2 1 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 0 8 68 0 2 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 1 5 68 2 1 68 1 0 69 2 8 70 0 2 68 2 8 68 3 4 68 3 4 68 1 6 69 0 8 54 54 67 1 5 47 5 6 67 0 7 67 2 1 6 7 2 7 67 3 3 69 3 5 6 9 2 9 70 0 7 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 50 0 2 69 1 8 6 9 2 6 50 0 1 69 1 4 6 9 1 0 68 1 2 6 8 2 0 6 8 2 8 67 3 0 67 3 6 6 7 2 2 6 7 1 6 6 7 0 4 67 0 5 67 1 1 67 1 7 67 2 3 67 2 9 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 1 3 49 5 6 49 5 0 49 4 4 49 3 8 68 1 2 68 0 6 68 0 0 67 2 8 67 2 2 67 1 6 67 1 0 67 0 4 49 5 7 49 5 1 69 1 7 69 2 3 69 2 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 25 70 2 4 70 1 8 70 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 69 2 8 69 2 2 69 1 6 49 4 5 49 3 9 70 2 2 70 1 6 70 1 0 54 69 2 3 69 1 6 69 2 2 54 6 9 1 1 68 2 8 68 2 7 54 4957 6313 6324 65 0 4 65 2 0 65 2 6 66 0 0 66 0 2 66 0 7 66 0 1 65 2 9 48 4 0 64 0 9 64 1 5 64 0 1 6329 632563156305 70 2 5 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 69 2 1 6 9 2 7 69 0 1 69 0 9 68 2 9 68 2 3 68 1 7 67 0 0 68 0 7 6 8 1 1 46 5 6 4 6 5 7 46 5 6 46 5 7 66 1 5 46 5 0 66 0 1 66 0 7 65 3 5 65 2 9 65 1 1 65 1 7 65 0 5 65 0 1 64 2 1 64 2 5 M a p D o c u m e n t : ( S : \ A E \ C \ C r y s t \ 1 1 7 0 3 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ 8 _ 1 1 _ D r i v e w a y _ L a n d s c a p e . m x d ) 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 1 - - 1 2 : 0 4 : 3 0 P M O 0 400 200 FeetFILE NO.CRYST117030 FIGURE 9 PH A S E 1 2 PH A S E 1 2 PR I V A T E D R I V E W A Y PR I V A T E D R I V E W A Y RE P L A C E M E N T P R O G R A M RE P L A C E M E N T P R O G R A M Le g e n d Pr o j e c t L i m i t s Ar e a N o t i n S t u d y Ci t y L i m i t s Ci t y o f N e w H o p e Re s i d e n t s i n t e r e s t e d in a D r i v e w a y R e p l a c e m e n t H a m p s h i r e A v e N K e n t u c A v e J e r s e A v e 4 7 t h A v e N I d a h o A v e L o u i s i a A v e N e v a d a A v e N F a i r v i e w A v e N 4 8 t h A v e N C o r v a l l i s A v e N L o u i s i a n a A v e N 5 1 s t P l N J e r s e y A v e N J e r s e y A v e N Douglas Dr NEdgewood Ave N 4 9 t h A v e N 5 0 t h A v e N 5 1 s t P l N M a r y l a n d A v e N Edgewood Ave N G e o r g i a A v e N K e n t u c k y A v e N F l o r i d a A v e N O r e g o n A v e N O r e g o n A v e N I d a h o A v e N C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Fo r e s t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Glen Havens Memorial Gardens Cementery Crystal Community Center Ev e r g r e e n Mo n t e s s o r i Sc h o o l Ne w H o p e Ic e A r e n a 4623 72 1 3 72 2 5 51 5 5 51 5 3 68 0 5 68 1 1 6 8 1 7 68 2 3 69 0 1 6 9 0 7 6 9 1 3 69 1 9 70 0 5 70 1 1 7 0 1 7 70 2 3 66 3 5 67 0 9 67 1 5 67 2 1 67 2 9 64 1 9 64 2 5 64 3 1 65 0 3 65 0 9 65 1 5 65 2 1 65 2 7 66 0 5 66 1 1 66 1 7 66 2 3 66 2 9 54 54 54 69 0 1 72 0 5 7 1 3 3 7 1 2 7 7 1 2 1 7 1 1 3 7 1 0 5 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 46 4 9 46 4 1 46 3 3 46 2 5 46 2 4 46 3 2 46 4 0 46 4 8 70 0 7 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 2 8 69 0 6 6 9 0 0 69 1 8 69 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 7 0 2 4 46 2 0 70 0 1 69 1 9 69 1 1 69 0 7 46 1 8 68 2 1 68 1 5 68 0 9 68 0 1 70 1 5 54 54 46 2 1 64 2 9 64 1 7 4625 6315 6321 6401 64 0 9 65 1 9 65 2 5 66 0 1 66 0 7 66 1 3 46 2 8 4649 4641 46336318 6324 6400 64 0 6 64 1 6 64 1 0 64 2 8 64 2 2 65 0 0 6 5 0 6 65 1 8 65 1 2 65 2 4 66 0 0 66 1 2 66 0 6 66 2 4 6 6 1 8 64 0 7 65 1 3 65 0 7 65 0 1 5213 5241 510054 4720 471647244725 4717 4716 4702 6212 6206 6200 6118 6112 61064800 462246304651464546394629 46234628464046506215610161076113 6119 4640 46344641 4635 4629 65 1 5 51 4 7 51 3 9 51 4 0 5136 5126 4909 490163055009500163226400 6406 64 0 7 6401 6321 63115153514651495131512551095115511663285103 64 1 0 6 4 0 2 51 0 2 51 0 8 51 1 4 51 1 5 51 2 8 51 2 2 51 2 7 51 4 1 51 5 0 51 4 4 51 2 5 51 3 1 51 1 9 51 0 9 65 0 0 65 3 0 65 1 4 51 0 2 6 6 1 8 6 6 0 8 51 2 4 51 3 2 51 4 0 54 64 1 5 64 2 5 65 0 5 65 1 5 65 2 1 6 5 3 1 6 6 0 3 6 6 1 1 66 1 9 6 6 2 1 66 2 4 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 0 65 2 4 66 0 6 6 6 0 0 65 1 8 65 1 2 50 0 9 6 4 2 4 6 4 2 0 6321 6327 6401 64 0 9 6 4 1 7 64 2 5 64 2 8 64 2 0 6 4 1 2 6 4 0 4 6 3 3 0 66 1 3 66 1 9 66 2 7 66 2 6 66 1 8 66 1 2 66 0 0 54 65 1 1 4 9 5 7 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 2 5 48 1 7 48 0 9 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 8 48 1 6 48 2 4 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 8 48 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 4 73 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 47 0 0 47 0 8 47 1 6 47 2 4 47 3 2 47 4 0 47 4 8 47 5 6 4841 4833 48324840 47 2 5 47 1 7 65 0 0 6 5 0 8 65 2 0 47 2 0 47 2 4 47 0 1 47 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 6312 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 4 7 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4 7 5 6 47 4 8 47 4 0 47 3 2 47 2 4 47 1 6 47 0 8 47 0 0 47 0 1 47 0 9 47 1 7 47 2 5 47 3 3 47 4 1 47 4 9 47 5 7 4756 4748 4740 4732 4724 4716 4708 4700 47014709471747254733474147494757484948484856 48 5 9 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 24 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 4825 4819 4817 4807 4801 48004806481248184824 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 68 0 0 47 5 7 47 4 9 47 4 1 47 3 3 47 2 5 47 1 7 47 0 9 47 0 1 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 5 7 48 4 9 48 4 8 48 5 6 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 2 4 48 1 8 48 1 2 48 0 0 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 2 5 48 1 9 48 1 3 48 0 7 48 0 1 48 0 0 48 0 6 48 1 2 48 1 8 48 2 4 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 40 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 4 1 48 3 3 48 3 2 48 4 0 48 0 1 48 0 7 69 3 4 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 1 3 68 2 1 50 5 0 50 2 4 70 1 5 67 0 2 67 0 8 67 1 4 67 2 0 68 0 2 68 0 8 51 2 3 51 1 7 67 0 6 67 0 8 67 1 5 67 2 1 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 0 8 68 0 2 68 1 6 68 2 2 68 1 5 68 2 1 68 1 0 69 2 8 70 0 2 68 2 8 68 3 4 68 3 4 68 1 6 69 0 8 54 54 67 1 5 47 5 6 67 0 7 67 2 1 6 7 2 7 67 3 3 69 3 5 6 9 2 9 70 0 7 70 1 2 7 0 1 8 50 0 2 69 1 8 6 9 2 6 50 0 1 69 1 4 6 9 1 0 68 1 2 6 8 2 0 6 8 2 8 67 3 0 67 3 6 6 7 2 2 6 7 1 6 6 7 0 4 67 0 5 67 1 1 67 1 7 67 2 3 67 2 9 68 0 1 68 0 7 68 1 3 49 5 6 49 5 0 49 4 4 49 3 8 68 1 2 68 0 6 68 0 0 67 2 8 67 2 2 67 1 6 67 1 0 67 0 4 49 5 7 49 5 1 69 1 7 69 2 3 69 2 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 25 70 2 4 70 1 8 70 1 2 70 0 6 70 0 0 69 2 8 69 2 2 69 1 6 49 4 5 49 3 9 70 2 2 70 1 6 70 1 0 54 69 2 3 69 1 6 69 2 2 54 6 9 1 1 68 2 8 68 2 7 54 4957 6313 6324 65 0 4 65 2 0 65 2 6 66 0 0 66 0 2 66 0 7 66 0 1 65 2 9 48 4 0 64 0 9 64 1 5 64 0 1 6329 632563156305 70 2 5 70 1 3 70 1 9 70 0 1 70 0 7 69 2 1 6 9 2 7 69 0 1 69 0 9 68 2 9 68 2 3 68 1 7 67 0 0 68 0 7 6 8 1 1 46 5 6 4 6 5 7 46 5 6 46 5 7 66 1 5 46 5 0 66 0 1 66 0 7 65 3 5 65 2 9 65 1 1 65 1 7 65 0 5 65 0 1 64 2 1 64 2 5 M a p D o c u m e n t : ( S : \ A E \ C \ C r y s t \ 1 1 7 0 3 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ 8 _ 1 1 _ S a n i t a r y S e w e r R e p l a c e m e n t _ L a n d s c a p e . m x d ) 8 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 1 - - 1 2 : 1 2 : 2 4 P M O 0 400 200 FeetFILE NO.CRYST117030 FIGURE 10 PH A S E 1 2 PH A S E 1 2 PR I V A T E S A N I T A R Y S E W E R S E R V I C E PR I V A T E S A N I T A R Y S E W E R S E R V I C E RE P L A C E M E N T P R O G R A M RE P L A C E M E N T P R O G R A M Le g e n d Pr o j e c t L i m i t s Ar e a N o t i n S t u d y Ci t y L i m i t s Ci t y o f N e w H o p e Re s i d e n t s i n t e r e s t e d in a S a n i t a r y S e w e r Se r v i c e R e p l a c e m e n t Appendix B Estimated Project Costs 2012 - FOREST NORTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION Opinion of Probable Cost P:\AE\C\Cryst\117030\4Prel\Qtys\[Opinion Cost & Financing PHASE 12 FR.xlsx]Opinion Cost EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $268,000.00 $268,000 0.01 $2,680 0.07 $18,760 0.10 $26,800 0.04 $10,720 2 2101.502 CLEARING TREE 24 $248.00 $5,991 3 $744 10 $2,480 3 2101.502 CLEARING--SPECIAL TREE 32 $294.00 $9,432 4 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 24 $114.60 $2,769 3 $344 10 $1,146 5 2101.507 GRUBBING--SPECIAL TREE 32 $124.00 $3,978 6 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 47,552 $2.35 $111,747 4,841 $11,376 5,911 $13,891 2,718 $6,387 7 2104.501 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 576 $19.07 $10,988 68 $1,301 8 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE STORM SEWER LIN FT 2,568 $7.94 $20,390 19 $151 9 2104.501 REMOVE AND REPLACE WATER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 84 $38.40 $3,214 10 2104.503 REMOVE RETAINING WALL SQ FT 139 $5.18 $723 11 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 558 $0.84 $469 12 2104.503 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 5,360 $4.86 $26,050 520 $2,527 1,000 $4,860 280 $1,361 13 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE APRON SQ YD 1,513 $5.14 $7,778 142 $731 80 $411 36 $183 14 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 5,602 $5.14 $28,794 374 $1,922 507 $2,606 427 $2,195 15 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 6,758 $2.92 $19,733 9 $26 560 $1,635 320 $934 107 $312 16 2104.505 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE APRON SQ YD 71 $44.34 $3,142 9 $399 17 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 100 $264.00 $26,400 1 $264 18 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIN FT 3,360 $3.64 $12,230 224 $815 304 $1,107 256 $932 19 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIN FT 4,495 $2.31 $10,383 15 $35 370 $855 212 $490 70 $162 20 2104.521 SALVAGE SPLIT RAIL FENCE LIN FT 42 $3.52 $147 21 2104.521 SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 601 $3.65 $2,193 121 $442 137 $502 63 $231 22 2104.521 SALVAGE WOOD FENCE LIN FT 70 $5.20 $363 23 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 100 $64.38 $6,438 1 $64 24 2104.523 SALVAGE SIGNS - TYPE SPECIAL EACH 45 $30.24 $1,350 25 2104.523 SALVAGE SIGN, TYPE "C"EACH 92 $26.64 $2,452 16 $420 18 $476 8 $219 26 2104.601 AGGREGATE BASE HANDLING, CLASS 7 LUMP SUM 1 $22,580.00 $22,580 0.01 $226 0.08 $1,806 0.11 $2,484 0.05 $1,129 27 2104.618 SALVAGE BRICK PAVERS SQ FT 314 $3.74 $1,174 28 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV)(P)CU YD 36,876 $9.36 $345,159 695 $6,507 4,432 $41,480 4,019 $37,616 2,581 $24,155 29 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION - RAIN GARDENS AND DRAINAGE SWALES (EV) CU YD 2,971 $13.10 $38,921 30 2105.501 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY WIDENING EXCAVATION (EV)CU YD 209 $19.20 $4,017 31 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CU YD 8,108 $7.38 $59,838 771 $5,693 338 $2,493 1,350 $9,962 176 $1,300 32 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD 9,867 $10.26 $101,235 1,168 $11,987 304 $3,119 1,768 $18,141 159 $1,627 33 2105.523 COMMON BORROW (CV)(P) CU YD 916 $0.45 $412 8 $3 61 $27 69 $31 32 $14 34 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)CU YD 12,962 $11.80 $152,952 4 $47 1,026 $12,107 1,066 $12,579 465 $5,487 35 2105.543 STABILIZING AGGREGATE TON 21 $28.50 $596 36 2105.607 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY SUBGRADE CORRECTION CU YD 188 $25.20 $4,745 MSA 47TH AVENUE S.A.P. 116-312-___ NEW HOPE MSA CRYSTAL LOUISIANA AVENUE S.A.P. 116-321-___ STREET UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIES UNIT COST (1) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST STREET STORM STREET STREET CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA Revised Date: August 31, 2011; September 2, 2011; September 12, 2011 ITEM NO. LINE NO. 49TH AVENUE 49TH / FAIRVIEW AVENUE S.A.P. 182-107-___ S.A.P. 116-325-___ CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-12 SEH NO. CRYST117030 Date: August 23, 2011 Page 1 of 10 EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST MSA 47TH AVENUE S.A.P. 116-312-___ NEW HOPE MSA CRYSTAL LOUISIANA AVENUE S.A.P. 116-321-___ STREET UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIES UNIT COST (1) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST STREET STORM STREET STREET ITEM NO. LINE NO. 49TH AVENUE 49TH / FAIRVIEW AVENUE S.A.P. 182-107-___ S.A.P. 116-325-___ 37 2106.605 TILL BOULEVARD SUBGRADE SQ YD 18,133 $0.66 $11,968 38 2111.501 TEST ROLLING RD STA 169 $29.70 $5,023 3 $101 13 $387 15 $439 7 $202 39 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RD STA 62 $150.20 $9,259 1 $150 4 $546 4 $619 2 $285 40 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 109 $133.00 $14,499 4 $594 8 $1,128 10 $1,280 4 $588 41 2130.501 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL M GALS 1,792 $22.40 $40,134 70 $1,572 133 $2,987 151 $3,387 70 $1,557 42 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 27,898 $11.31 $315,523 747 $8,445 8,026 $90,779 6,243 $70,607 4,186 $47,340 43 2211.607 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED, CLASS 7 (CV)CU YD 10,224 $8.02 $82,000 44 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5")SQ YD 1,519 $3.32 $5,045 44 $145 184 $612 209 $694 96 $319 45 2331.603 SAW AND SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACK CONTROL JOINTS LIN FT 25,391 $2.08 $52,813 189 $394 1,818 $3,782 2,062 $4,289 948 $1,972 46 2331.604 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 7, FULL DEPTH RECYCLED PRODUCTION SQ YD 95,947 $0.78 $74,838 1,274 $994 7,665 $5,979 8,972 $6,998 4,002 $3,121 47 2331.604 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BREAKUP REPAIR SQ YD 741 $34.99 $25,912 32 $1,116 61 $2,121 69 $2,405 32 $1,106 48 2331.604 2.5 IN. WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 6,780 $19.89 $134,854 9 $179 560 $11,138 320 $6,365 107 $2,128 49 2331.604 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY BITUMINOUS PAVING SQ YD 2,657 $24.40 $64,837 50 2350.502 TYPE LVWE35030C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 6,841 $54.57 $373,331 51 2350.502 TYPE LVNW35030B NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 9,480 $48.80 $462,618 52 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALS 5,798 $4.15 $24,060 71 $295 462 $1,917 534 $2,217 241 $1,000 53 2360.501 TYPE SPWEB240C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 5,809 $55.93 $324,873 274 $15,313 2,286 $127,862 2,056 $115,020 1,192 $66,679 54 2411.603 INSTALL OR REPLACE CONCRETE STEPS LIN FT 276 $55.74 $15,384 12 $669 72 $4,013 55 2411.618 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ FT 3,000 $20.30 $60,900 300 $6,090 900 $18,270 56 2411.618 ADJUST RETAINING WALL SQ FT 108 $22.00 $2,386 12 $267 6 $139 57 2451.607 REPLACEMENT BACKFILL (Mn/DOT 3149.2D) (CV)CU YD 1,006 $6.99 $7,035 10 $70 58 2451.609 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE FOUNDATION TON 139 $28.00 $3,906 59 2502.521 4-INCH PVC SDR 35 CROSSING LIN FT 231 $9.74 $2,249 60 2502.541 4-INCH PE CORRUGATED PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN WITH SOCK LIN FT 6,041 $8.25 $49,838 400 $3,300 61 2502.602 PE SUMP BOX EACH 40 $181.52 $7,261 62 2502.602 CONNECT 4-INCH PVC OR PERF PE TO STORM SEWER EACH 57 $140.29 $7,997 4 $561 63 2503.511 12-INCH CORRUGATED PE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 3,211 $23.90 $76,743 64 2503.511 15-INCH CORRUGATED PE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 327 $27.15 $8,878 65 2503.511 24-INCH PVC SDR 35 PIPE SEWER LIN FT $106.41 66 2503.541 12-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS V LIN FT 519 $30.77 $15,970 19 $585 67 2503.541 15-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS V LIN FT 16 $32.17 $515 68 2503.541 18-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS V LIN FT 390 $28.98 $11,302 69 2503.541 21-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 16 $38.63 $618 70 2503.541 24-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 455 $36.13 $16,439 71 2503.541 27-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 358 $46.00 $16,468 72 2503.541 30-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 48 $54.61 $2,621 73 2503.541 33-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 347 $60.00 $20,820 74 2503.541 36-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 96 $66.61 $6,395 75 2503.541 42-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 32 $106.51 $3,408 76 2503.602 BULKHEAD PIPE/STRUCTURE EACH 4 $205.60 $860 77 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 57 $458.39 $26,128 1 $458 78 2503.602 EXPOSE & REPAIR 4" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION EACH 70 $1,301.04 $90,739 79 2503.602 EXPOSE & REPAIR 6" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION EACH 3 $1,450.40 $4,046 Page 2 of 10 EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST MSA 47TH AVENUE S.A.P. 116-312-___ NEW HOPE MSA CRYSTAL LOUISIANA AVENUE S.A.P. 116-321-___ STREET UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIES UNIT COST (1) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST STREET STORM STREET STREET ITEM NO. LINE NO. 49TH AVENUE 49TH / FAIRVIEW AVENUE S.A.P. 182-107-___ S.A.P. 116-325-___ 80 2503.602 EXPOSE & REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WITH EXISTING PVC SLEEVE EACH 4 $1,355.31 $5,671 81 2503.602 EXPOSE & REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE EACH 7 $1,046.60 $7,299 82 2503.602 ADJUST SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CLEANOUT EACH 3 $201.37 $562 83 2503.541 16-INCH OD HDPE DR 11 PIPE SEWER LIN FT 160 $125.00 $20,000 84 2503.603 REMOVE & REPLACE 4 INCH SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 70 $37.40 $2,608 85 2503.603 REMOVE & REPLACE 6 INCH SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 14 $49.51 $691 86 2503.604 2-INCH RIGID INSULATION SQ YD 107 $25.12 $2,698 87 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 84 $291.82 $24,646 2 $584 7 $2,122 8 $2,407 4 $1,107 88 2504.602 REPAIR GATE VALVE BOX EACH 27 $467.22 $12,784 2 $1,133 3 $1,285 1 $591 89 2504.602 REPLACE CURB STOP BOX EACH 1 $370.00 $516 90 2504.602 ADJUST CURB STOP BOX EACH 32 $115.59 $3,646 2 $280 3 $318 1 $146 91 2504.602 REPAIR CURB STOP BOX EACH 7 $194.86 $1,443 1 $236 1 $268 1 $123 92 2504.602 OFFSET EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 1 $2,954.12 $4,121 93 2504.602 RELOCATE HYDRANT EACH 6 $5,067.06 $32,620 2 $12,283 3 $13,931 1 $6,406 94 2504.602 INSTALL HYDRANT, GATE VALVE AND 6-INCH DIP CL 52 ASSEMBLY EACH 8 $5,564.39 $46,570 95 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN B LIN FT 89 $280.30 $24,947 96 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN C LIN FT 70 $391.43 $27,400 97 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN D LIN FT 70 $553.53 $38,747 98 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN E LIN FT $669.52 99 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN F LIN FT $843.06 100 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN X LIN FT 247 $288.39 $71,232 101 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN Y LIN FT 253 $344.02 $87,106 5 $1,720 102 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-1733 EACH 35 $758.80 $26,558 103 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-1733-1 (SELF SEAL LID)EACH 12 $775.38 $8,985 1 $940 1 $1,066 1 $490 104 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-3067-V EACH 131 $618.00 $80,958 1 $618 105 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-3290A EACH 6 $646.00 $3,604 106 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 111 $491.46 $54,472 10 $4,766 11 $5,405 5 $2,485 107 2506.602 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE EACH 25 $1,066.93 $26,673 4 $3,880 4 $4,400 2 $2,023 108 2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE I SQ YD 84 $3.24 $271 109 2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE VI SQ YD 13,732 $2.50 $34,330 1,293 $3,232 1,283 $3,206 377 $943 110 2521.501 4-INCH CONCRETE WALK (2)SQ FT 26,435 $2.89 $76,397 6,560 $18,958 13,080 $37,801 6,795 $19,638 111 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LIN FT 58,718 $7.98 $468,570 5,212 $41,592 5,911 $47,170 2,718 $21,690 112 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, DESIGN B618 - HAND FORM LIN FT 341 $14.31 $4,875 36 $520 41 $590 19 $271 113 2531.507 6-INCH CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 5,602 $36.39 $203,857 374 $13,610 507 $18,450 427 $15,539 114 2531.603 SURFACE TREATMENT - EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 5,762 $0.58 $3,342 682 $396 115 2531.604 7-INCH CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER SQ YD 393 $54.04 $21,257 116 2531.604 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY CONCRETE PAVING SQ YD 4,812 $41.40 $199,230 117 2531.618 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SQ FT 2,553 $8.91 $22,749 600 $5,346 800 $7,128 400 $3,564 118 2540.618 INSTALL SALVAGED BRICK PAVERS SQ FT 314 $8.70 $2,730 119 2557.603 INSTALL SALVAGED CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 601 $15.35 $9,223 121 $1,861 137 $2,110 63 $970 120 2557.603 INSTALL SALVAGED WOOD FENCE LIN FT 70 $39.90 $2,783 121 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000 0.01 $100 0.07 $700 0.10 $1,000 0.04 $400 122 2564.531 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE "C"SQ FT 529 $28.80 $15,223 129 $3,709 146 $4,206 67 $1,934 123 2564.602 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE SPECIAL EACH 45 $273.00 $12,186 124 2564.602 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGNS, TYPE "C"EACH 24 $74.80 $1,766 4 $272 4 $308 2 $142 Page 3 of 10 EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST MSA 47TH AVENUE S.A.P. 116-312-___ NEW HOPE MSA CRYSTAL LOUISIANA AVENUE S.A.P. 116-321-___ STREET UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIES UNIT COST (1) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST STREET STORM STREET STREET ITEM NO. LINE NO. 49TH AVENUE 49TH / FAIRVIEW AVENUE S.A.P. 182-107-___ S.A.P. 116-325-___ 125 2565.602 NMC LOOP DETECTOR 6' x 15'EACH 2 $1,633.00 $3,266 2 $3,266 126 2565.602 NMC LOOP DETECTOR 6' x 6'EACH 1 $1,226.00 $1,226 1 $1,226 127 2565.602 ADJUST HANDHOLE COVER EACH 1 $274.00 $274 1 $274 128 2571.502 AMERICAN YELLOWWOOD 2-INCH B AND B TREE 6 $284.04 $1,757 1 $284 1 $284 129 2571.502 AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 $374.60 $1,794 1 $375 1 $375 130 2571.502 AUTUMN SPLENDOR BUCKEYE 2-INCH B AND B TREE 1 $288.60 $289 1 $289 131 2571.502 BITTERNUT HICKORY 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 $381.20 $1,976 1 $381 132 2571.502 BUR OAK 2-INCH B AND B TREE 6 $261.20 $1,615 1 $261 1 $261 133 2571.502 COMMON HACKBERRY 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 $212.40 $1,101 1 $212 134 2571.502 IVORY SILK TREE LILAC 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 $240.28 $1,246 1 $240 135 2571.502 KENTUCKY COFFEETREE 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 $285.20 $1,479 1 $285 136 2571.502 SILVER LINDEN 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 $261.80 $1,357 1 $262 137 2571.502 TRIUMPH ELM 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 $222.40 $1,153 1 $222 138 2571.502 TURKISH FILBERT 2-INCH B AND B TREE 3 $319.20 $890 139 2571.505 SHRUB RESIDENTIAL RAIN GARDEN SHRUB 106 $28.90 $3,064 140 2571.507 PERENNIALS DAY LILY (1 YEAR, CONTAINER)PLANT 56 $11.10 $619 141 2571.507 PERENNIALS RESIDENTIAL RAIN GARDEN PLANT 5,273 $8.71 $45,925 142 2571.507 PERENNIALS RESIDENTIAL RAIN GARDEN - FURNISHED ONLY PLANT 929 $7.44 $6,912 143 2573.502 SILT FENCE LIN FT 621 $1.94 $1,204 144 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION - TYPE A EACH 131 $128.00 $16,768 1 $128 145 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION - TYPE B EACH 131 $118.00 $15,458 1 $118 146 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN SQ YD 77,753 $2.29 $178,054 23 $52 6,155 $14,095 6,398 $14,650 2,788 $6,385 147 2575.513 MULCH MATERIAL, TYPE 6 CU YD 114 $44.20 $5,056 148 2575.532 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER, ANALYSIS 12-0-12 LB 4,728 $0.46 $2,175 5 $2 485 $223 550 $253 253 $116 149 2575.535 POST WARRANTY SOD WATERING M GALS 1,484 $11.74 $17,424 150 2575.604 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SQ YD 2,392 $6.20 $14,832 151 2575.605 HYDROSEEDING ACRE 0.4 $2,462.00 $1,030 152 2575.607 PLANTING SOIL (CV)CU YD 932 $43.20 $40,253 153 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE DOUBLE YELLOW, PAINT LIN FT 682 $0.15 $102 341 $51 341 $51 154 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE DOUBLE YELLOW, EPOXY LIN FT 682 $0.46 $314 341 $157 341 $157 155 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW, PAINT LIN FT 1,645 $0.09 $148 652 $59 654 $59 340 $31 156 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW, EPOXY LIN FT 1,645 $0.24 $395 652 $156 654 $157 340 $82 157 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE, PAINT LIN FT 6,922 $0.09 $623 341 $31 2,606 $235 2,616 $235 1,359 $122 158 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE, EPOXY LIN FT 6,922 $0.24 $1,661 341 $82 2,606 $625 2,616 $628 1,359 $326 159 2582.503 ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE, EPOXY SQ FT 2,152 $3.06 $6,585 629 $1,925 713 $2,183 328 $1,004 Page 4 of 10 EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST MSA 47TH AVENUE S.A.P. 116-312-___ NEW HOPE MSA CRYSTAL LOUISIANA AVENUE S.A.P. 116-321-___ STREET UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIES UNIT COST (1) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST STREET STORM STREET STREET ITEM NO. LINE NO. 49TH AVENUE 49TH / FAIRVIEW AVENUE S.A.P. 182-107-___ S.A.P. 116-325-___ OPINION OF PROBABLE COST TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $5,489,230 $62,887 $4,176 $493,080 $549,213 $269,376 22% LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING $1,207,631 $13,835 $919 $108,478 $120,827 $59,263 TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,696,860 $76,722 $5,095 $601,558 $670,040 $328,639 LESS SANITARY SEWER COSTS (INCL CRYSTAL + 22% L,A,E)($22,440) LESS WATER MAIN COSTS (INCL CRYSTAL + 22% L,A,E)($64,128)TOTAL PROJECT COST - EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR FINANCING PURPOSES $6,610,292 $76,722 $5,095 $601,558 $670,040 $328,639 Notes: (1) ASSUMES PHASE 11 AVERAGE BID UNIT COSTS WITH NO INFLATION 32,240 341 341 2,606 2,956 1,359 $170.26 $184.42 $12.25 $189.21 $185.83 $198.22 $154.49 Compare to 58th Ave.$155.11 Compare to 58th Ave.$122.55 Compare to 58th Ave.$155.11 Compare to 58th Ave.$155.11 Compare to 58th Ave.$155.11 $150.33 Compare to Adair Ave.$161.69 Compare to 47th Ave.$183.20 Compare to Adair Ave.$161.69 10.2%18.9%-90.0%22.0%19.8%27.8% 13.3%#DIV/0!#DIV/0!17.0%1.4%22.6% $205.03 $224.99 $14.94 $230.84 $226.71 $241.82 $185.19 $185.19 $185.19 Compare to 58th Ave.$189.23 Compare to 58th Ave.$189.23 Compare to 58th Ave.$189.23 $170.46 Compare to Adair Ave.$197.26 Compare to 47th Ave.$223.50 Compare to Adair Ave.$197.26 $177.29 $177.29 $177.29 $177.29 $177.29 $177.29 10.7%21.5%-91.9%22.0%19.8%27.8% 20.3%17.0%1.4%22.6% 15.6%26.9%-91.6%30.2%27.9%36.4% COST COMPARISON (2) NOT INCLUDING OPTIONAL 48TH AVENUE ($18,930) OR HAMPSHIRE AVENUE ($9,580) CONSTRUCTION COSTS TOTAL LENGTH PHASE 12 vs. PHASE 10 % CHANGE PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 vs. 2007 UPDATE % CHANGE PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 11 PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 10 PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS 2007 UPDATE PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 vs. PHASE 11 % CHANGE PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 11 LOW BID CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 10 ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 vs. PHASE 11 % CHANGE CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 vs. PHASE 10 % CHANGE CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Page 5 of 10 2012 - FOREST NORTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION Opinion of Probable Cost P:\AE\C\Cryst\117030\4Prel\Qtys\[Opinion Cost & Financing PHASE 12 FR.xlsx]Opinion Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2 2101.502 CLEARING TREE 24 3 2101.502 CLEARING--SPECIAL TREE 32 4 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 24 5 2101.507 GRUBBING--SPECIAL TREE 32 6 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 47,552 7 2104.501 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 576 8 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE STORM SEWER LIN FT 2,568 9 2104.501 REMOVE AND REPLACE WATER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 84 10 2104.503 REMOVE RETAINING WALL SQ FT 139 11 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 558 12 2104.503 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 5,360 13 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE APRON SQ YD 1,513 14 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 5,602 15 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 6,758 16 2104.505 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE APRON SQ YD 71 17 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 100 18 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIN FT 3,360 19 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIN FT 4,495 20 2104.521 SALVAGE SPLIT RAIL FENCE LIN FT 42 21 2104.521 SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 601 22 2104.521 SALVAGE WOOD FENCE LIN FT 70 23 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 100 24 2104.523 SALVAGE SIGNS - TYPE SPECIAL EACH 45 25 2104.523 SALVAGE SIGN, TYPE "C"EACH 92 26 2104.601 AGGREGATE BASE HANDLING, CLASS 7 LUMP SUM 1 27 2104.618 SALVAGE BRICK PAVERS SQ FT 314 28 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV)(P)CU YD 36,876 29 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION - RAIN GARDENS AND DRAINAGE SWALES (EV) CU YD 2,971 30 2105.501 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY WIDENING EXCAVATION (EV)CU YD 209 31 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CU YD 8,108 32 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD 9,867 33 2105.523 COMMON BORROW (CV)(P) CU YD 916 34 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)CU YD 12,962 35 2105.543 STABILIZING AGGREGATE TON 21 36 2105.607 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY SUBGRADE CORRECTION CU YD 188 UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIES CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA Revised Date: August 31, 2011; September 2, 2011; September 12, 2011 ITEM NO. LINE NO. CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-12 SEH NO. CRYST117030 Date: August 23, 2011 EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST 0.02 $5,360 0.62 $166,160 0.11 $29,480 0.01 $2,680 0.02 $5,360 11 $2,767 32 $9,432 11 $1,279 32 $3,978 34,082 $80,093 206 $3,923 302 $5,765 2,549 $20,239 84 $3,214 139 $723 558 $469 3,560 $17,302 1,255 $6,453 4,294 $22,071 27 $79 5,735 $16,746 27 $1,197 35 $1,546 1 $264 98 $25,872 2,576 $9,377 45 $104 3,783 $8,739 42 $147 279 $1,018 70 $363 1 $64 98 $6,309 45 $1,350 50 $1,338 0.02 $452 0.73 $16,483 314 $1,174 1,216 $11,386 23,933 $224,015 2,971 $38,921 209 $4,017 103 $759 5,370 $39,631 843 $8,645 5,625 $57,716 4 $2 743 $335 12 $142 10,389 $122,590 21 $596 188 $4,745 WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWERSTORM NEW HOPE STREET STORM LOCAL CRYSTAL STREET Page 6 of 10 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIESITEM NO. LINE NO. 37 2106.605 TILL BOULEVARD SUBGRADE SQ YD 18,133 38 2111.501 TEST ROLLING RD STA 169 39 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RD STA 62 40 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 109 41 2130.501 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL M GALS 1,792 42 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 27,898 43 2211.607 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED, CLASS 7 (CV)CU YD 10,224 44 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5")SQ YD 1,519 45 2331.603 SAW AND SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACK CONTROL JOINTS LIN FT 25,391 46 2331.604 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 7, FULL DEPTH RECYCLED PRODUCTION SQ YD 95,947 47 2331.604 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BREAKUP REPAIR SQ YD 741 48 2331.604 2.5 IN. WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 6,780 49 2331.604 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY BITUMINOUS PAVING SQ YD 2,657 50 2350.502 TYPE LVWE35030C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 6,841 51 2350.502 TYPE LVNW35030B NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 9,480 52 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALS 5,798 53 2360.501 TYPE SPWEB240C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 5,809 54 2411.603 INSTALL OR REPLACE CONCRETE STEPS LIN FT 276 55 2411.618 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ FT 3,000 56 2411.618 ADJUST RETAINING WALL SQ FT 108 57 2451.607 REPLACEMENT BACKFILL (Mn/DOT 3149.2D) (CV)CU YD 1,006 58 2451.609 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE FOUNDATION TON 139 59 2502.521 4-INCH PVC SDR 35 CROSSING LIN FT 231 60 2502.541 4-INCH PE CORRUGATED PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN WITH SOCK LIN FT 6,041 61 2502.602 PE SUMP BOX EACH 40 62 2502.602 CONNECT 4-INCH PVC OR PERF PE TO STORM SEWER EACH 57 63 2503.511 12-INCH CORRUGATED PE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 3,211 64 2503.511 15-INCH CORRUGATED PE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 327 65 2503.511 24-INCH PVC SDR 35 PIPE SEWER LIN FT 66 2503.541 12-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS V LIN FT 519 67 2503.541 15-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS V LIN FT 16 68 2503.541 18-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS V LIN FT 390 69 2503.541 21-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 16 70 2503.541 24-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 455 71 2503.541 27-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 358 72 2503.541 30-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 48 73 2503.541 33-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 347 74 2503.541 36-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 96 75 2503.541 42-INCH RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006, CLASS III LIN FT 32 76 2503.602 BULKHEAD PIPE/STRUCTURE EACH 4 77 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 57 78 2503.602 EXPOSE & REPAIR 4" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION EACH 70 79 2503.602 EXPOSE & REPAIR 6" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION EACH 3 EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWERSTORM NEW HOPE STREET STORM LOCAL CRYSTAL STREET 18,133 $11,968 6 $165 126 $3,729 2 $325 49 $7,333 5 $705 77 $10,204 35 $792 1,332 $29,839 348 $3,937 8,348 $94,413 561 $4,503 9,663 $77,497 88 $293 898 $2,982 177 $368 20,196 $42,008 3,028 $2,362 71,006 $55,385 18 $618 530 $18,547 49 $975 5,735 $114,069 2,657 $64,837 280 $15,280 6,561 $358,051 373 $18,219 9,107 $444,398 170 $704 4,320 $17,928 192 $10,702 1,800 $36,540 90 $1,980 20 $140 265 $1,852 711 $4,973 139 $3,906 90 $877 141 $1,372 1,370 $11,303 4,271 $35,235 40 $7,261 3 $421 50 $7,015 3,211 $76,743 327 $8,878 500 $15,385 16 $515 390 $11,302 16 $618 455 $16,439 358 $16,468 48 $2,621 347 $20,820 96 $6,395 32 $3,408 4 $860 1 $458 55 $25,211 70 $90,739 3 $4,046 Page 7 of 10 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIESITEM NO. LINE NO. 80 2503.602 EXPOSE & REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WITH EXISTING PVC SLEEVE EACH 4 81 2503.602 EXPOSE & REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE EACH 7 82 2503.602 ADJUST SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CLEANOUT EACH 3 83 2503.541 16-INCH OD HDPE DR 11 PIPE SEWER LIN FT 160 84 2503.603 REMOVE & REPLACE 4 INCH SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 70 85 2503.603 REMOVE & REPLACE 6 INCH SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 14 86 2503.604 2-INCH RIGID INSULATION SQ YD 107 87 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 84 88 2504.602 REPAIR GATE VALVE BOX EACH 27 89 2504.602 REPLACE CURB STOP BOX EACH 1 90 2504.602 ADJUST CURB STOP BOX EACH 32 91 2504.602 REPAIR CURB STOP BOX EACH 7 92 2504.602 OFFSET EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 1 93 2504.602 RELOCATE HYDRANT EACH 6 94 2504.602 INSTALL HYDRANT, GATE VALVE AND 6-INCH DIP CL 52 ASSEMBLY EACH 8 95 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN B LIN FT 89 96 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN C LIN FT 70 97 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN D LIN FT 70 98 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN E LIN FT 99 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN F LIN FT 100 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN X LIN FT 247 101 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DESIGN Y LIN FT 253 102 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-1733 EACH 35 103 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-1733-1 (SELF SEAL LID)EACH 12 104 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-3067-V EACH 131 105 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-3290A EACH 6 106 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 111 107 2506.602 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE EACH 25 108 2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE I SQ YD 84 109 2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE VI SQ YD 13,732 110 2521.501 4-INCH CONCRETE WALK (2)SQ FT 26,435 111 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LIN FT 58,718 112 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, DESIGN B618 - HAND FORM LIN FT 341 113 2531.507 6-INCH CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 5,602 114 2531.603 SURFACE TREATMENT - EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 5,762 115 2531.604 7-INCH CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER SQ YD 393 116 2531.604 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY CONCRETE PAVING SQ YD 4,812 117 2531.618 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SQ FT 2,553 118 2540.618 INSTALL SALVAGED BRICK PAVERS SQ FT 314 119 2557.603 INSTALL SALVAGED CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 601 120 2557.603 INSTALL SALVAGED WOOD FENCE LIN FT 70 121 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 122 2564.531 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE "C"SQ FT 529 123 2564.602 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE SPECIAL EACH 45 124 2564.602 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGNS, TYPE "C"EACH 24 EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWERSTORM NEW HOPE STREET STORM LOCAL CRYSTAL STREET 4 $5,671 7 $7,299 3 $562 160 $20,000 70 $2,608 14 $691 107 $2,698 2 $516 61 $17,910 21 $9,776 1 $516 25 $2,902 4 $815 1 $4,121 8 $46,570 89.0 $24,947 70.0 $27,400 70.0 $38,747 247.0 $71,232 5 $1,720 243.2 $83,666 35.0 $26,558 8 $6,489 1 $618 129 $79,722 6 $3,604 85 $41,817 15 $16,371 84 $271 3,086 $7,714 7,694 $19,235 44,877 $358,118 244 $3,493 4,294 $156,259 2,057 $1,193 3,023 $1,753 393 $21,257 4,812 $199,230 753 $6,711 314 $2,730 279 $4,282 70 $2,783 0.02 $200 0.62 $6,200 0 $1,100 0.01 $100 0.02 $200 187 $5,373 45 $12,186 14 $1,043 Page 8 of 10 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIESITEM NO. LINE NO. 125 2565.602 NMC LOOP DETECTOR 6' x 15'EACH 2 126 2565.602 NMC LOOP DETECTOR 6' x 6'EACH 1 127 2565.602 ADJUST HANDHOLE COVER EACH 1 128 2571.502 AMERICAN YELLOWWOOD 2-INCH B AND B TREE 6 129 2571.502 AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 130 2571.502 AUTUMN SPLENDOR BUCKEYE 2-INCH B AND B TREE 1 131 2571.502 BITTERNUT HICKORY 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 132 2571.502 BUR OAK 2-INCH B AND B TREE 6 133 2571.502 COMMON HACKBERRY 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 134 2571.502 IVORY SILK TREE LILAC 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 135 2571.502 KENTUCKY COFFEETREE 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 136 2571.502 SILVER LINDEN 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 137 2571.502 TRIUMPH ELM 2-INCH B AND B TREE 5 138 2571.502 TURKISH FILBERT 2-INCH B AND B TREE 3 139 2571.505 SHRUB RESIDENTIAL RAIN GARDEN SHRUB 106 140 2571.507 PERENNIALS DAY LILY (1 YEAR, CONTAINER)PLANT 56 141 2571.507 PERENNIALS RESIDENTIAL RAIN GARDEN PLANT 5,273 142 2571.507 PERENNIALS RESIDENTIAL RAIN GARDEN - FURNISHED ONLY PLANT 929 143 2573.502 SILT FENCE LIN FT 621 144 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION - TYPE A EACH 131 145 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION - TYPE B EACH 131 146 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN SQ YD 77,753 147 2575.513 MULCH MATERIAL, TYPE 6 CU YD 114 148 2575.532 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER, ANALYSIS 12-0-12 LB 4,728 149 2575.535 POST WARRANTY SOD WATERING M GALS 1,484 150 2575.604 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SQ YD 2,392 151 2575.605 HYDROSEEDING ACRE 0.4 152 2575.607 PLANTING SOIL (CV)CU YD 932 153 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE DOUBLE YELLOW, PAINT LIN FT 682 154 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE DOUBLE YELLOW, EPOXY LIN FT 682 155 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW, PAINT LIN FT 1,645 156 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW, EPOXY LIN FT 1,645 157 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE, PAINT LIN FT 6,922 158 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE, EPOXY LIN FT 6,922 159 2582.503 ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE, EPOXY SQ FT 2,152 EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWERSTORM NEW HOPE STREET STORM LOCAL CRYSTAL STREET 4 $1,189 3 $1,045 4 $1,595 4 $1,093 4 $889 4 $1,005 4 $1,193 4 $1,096 4 $931 3 $890 106 $3,064 56 $619 5,273 $45,925 929 $6,912 621 $1,204 1 $128 129 $16,512 1 $118 129 $15,222 69 $157 62,321 $142,715 114 $5,056 18 $8 3,417 $1,572 1,484 $17,424 2,392 $14,832 0.4 $1,030 932 $40,253 481 $1,473 Page 9 of 10 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 UNITITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITIESITEM NO. LINE NO. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 22% LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING TOTAL PROJECT COST LESS SANITARY SEWER COSTS (INCL CRYSTAL + 22% L,A,E) LESS WATER MAIN COSTS (INCL CRYSTAL + 22% L,A,E)TOTAL PROJECT COST - EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR FINANCING PURPOSES Notes: (1) ASSUMES PHASE 11 AVERAGE BID UNIT COSTS WITH NO INFLATION COST COMPARISON (2) NOT INCLUDING OPTIONAL 48TH AVENUE ($18,930) OR HAMPSHIRE AVENUE ($9,580) CONSTRUCTION COSTS TOTAL LENGTH PHASE 12 vs. PHASE 10 % CHANGE PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 vs. 2007 UPDATE % CHANGE PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 11 PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 10 PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS 2007 UPDATE PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 vs. PHASE 11 % CHANGE PROJECT COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE, SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 11 LOW BID CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 10 ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 vs. PHASE 11 % CHANGE CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 12 vs. PHASE 10 % CHANGE CONSTRUCTION COST/LF EXCLUDING PRIVATE COST & INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST EST COST WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWERSTORM NEW HOPE STREET STORM LOCAL CRYSTAL STREET $103,682 $18,896 $3,221,776 $695,186 $52,564 $18,394 $22,810 $4,157 $708,791 $152,941 $11,564 $4,047 $126,493 $23,053 $3,930,567 $848,127 $64,128 $22,440 ($22,440) ($64,128) $126,493 $23,053 $3,930,567 $848,127 1,029 1,029 23,950 32,240 23,950 23,950 $100.81 $18.37 $134.52 $21.56 $2.19 $0.77 $174.98 $109.13 $34.45 $2.47 $0.61 $96.06 $9.75 $109.37 $17.30 $1.39 $4.10 -42.4%#DIV/0!23.3%-37.4%-11.0%26.0% 4.9%88.4%23.0%24.6%57.9%-81.3% $122.99 $22.41 $164.12 $26.31 $213.47 $133.14 $42.02 $117.19 $11.90 $133.43 $21.10 $177.29 $177.29 $177.29 -42.4%23.3%-37.4% 4.9%88.4%23.0%24.7% -30.6%-87.4%-7.4% COST COMPARISON Page 10 of 10 Appendix C Estimated Assessment Rate Calculation for B618 Curb Reincorporation CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 2012 - FOREST NORTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-12 Estimated B618 Curb Assessment Rate and Unfunded Amount Calculation SEH NO. CRYST117030 Date: August 24, 2011 Revised Date: August 31, 2011 ; September 12, 2011 P:\AE\C\Cryst\117030\4Prel\Qtys\[Opinion Cost & Financing PHASE 12 FR.xlsx]PH 12 B Curb Financing Item Quantity Unit Cost Cost Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter (LF)3,376 (1)(3)$2.35 $7,933.60 Concrete Curb and Gutter, Design B618 (LF)3,376 (1)(3)$7.98 $26,940.48 Remove and Replace Existing Curb (LF)312 (2)(3)$19.07 $5,955.56 Surface Treatment - Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter (LF)2,811 (2)(3)$0.58 $1,630.21 $42,459.85 (4)8,644.21 Estimated assessment rate per ASSESSABLE front foot of existing "B" Curb (LF) (4)$4.91 Total Estimated Cost to be Assessed $42,443.07 Total B618 Curb Reconstruction / Repair Unfunded Amount $16.78 Estimated Cost to Reconstruct / Repair B618 Curb Total Existing B618 Curb Assessable Front Footage (LF) (1) Along the following streets: ∙ 47th Avenue between Louisiana Avenue and Douglas Drive ∙ 49th Avenue between Nevada Avenue and 150' east of Nevada Avenue ∙ 50th Avenue between Florida Avenue and Douglas Drive (3) Excludes existing B618 curb along New Hope streets (4) Excludes the assessable front footage of property with existing B618 curb that is City or in the City of New Hope ∙ Fairview Avenue between 150' east of Hampshire Avenue and Douglas Drive ∙ Edgewood Avenue between Corvallis Avenue and 51st Place (2) Along the following streets: ∙ 48th Avenue between Nevada Avenues and 150' east of Nevada Avenue ∙ Florida Avenue between Fairview and Corvallis Avenues ∙ 4801, 4807 and 4813 Idaho Avenues ∙ Nevada Avenue ∙ 47th Avenue between Nevada and Louisiana Avenues Appendix D Mock Assessment Roll Appendix E Summary of Fund Sources Estimated Cumulative Street Reconstruction Fund Deficit CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 2012 - FOREST NORTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-12 SUMMARY OF FUND SOURCES - WITHOUT SANITARY AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS $4,917 Per Lot Single Family/Duplex Property Assessment Rate (0% Increase from Phase 11) SEH NO. CRYST117030 Date: August 24, 2011 Revised Date: August 31, 2011; September 2, 2011; September 12, 2011 P:\AE\C\Cryst\117030\4Prel\Qtys\[Opinion Cost & Financing PHASE 12 FR.xlsx]SumFS 12 (1)13(1)14 (1)N/A (26)12-14 (1) A Total Estimated Project Cost $6,610,292 (9)$5,926,709 (5)(9)$5,341,337 (5)(9)$0 B Less Other Community Cost (4)$231,363 (9)$53,871 (5)(9)$181,025 (5)(9)$0 C Less Concrete Curb and Gutter $707,082 (7)(8)739,624$ (11)441,241$ (11)$0 D Less Storm Drain Utility $450,000 (13)$450,000 (13)$450,000 (13)$0 Net Cost for Street Assessment E (Before MSA deduction)$5,221,847 $4,683,214 $4,269,072 $0 F Net Cost for Street Assessment $5,221,847 $4,683,214 $4,269,072 $0 G Single Family/Duplex Property Front Footage (/LF)39,459.38 (12)37,720 (11)40,554 (11)0.00 H "Commercial & Non-Profit" Property Front Footage (/LF)4,388.16 (12)11,425 (11)2,374 (11)0.00 I Total Front Footage (/LF)43,847.54 (12)49,145 (11)42,928 (11)0.00 J Single Family %89.99%76.75%94.47% K Commercial & Non-Profit Property %10.01%23.25%5.53% L Single Family/Duplex Property (Net Cost X Single Family %)$4,699,140 $3,594,367 $4,032,992 $0 M "Commercial &Non-Profit"Property (Net Cost X Commercial &Non- Profit Property %)$522,707 $1,088,847 $236,080 $0 Single Family/Duplex Street Assessment: N Estimated Cost $4,699,140 $3,594,367 $4,032,992 $0 O Less MSA Funds Pledged (14)$1,720,008 (16)$1,311,636 (17)$1,360,087 (18)$0 $4,391,730 (20) P Less Funds to reach assessment rate $535,384 $419,188 $740,524 $0 $1,695,096 S Less Street Reconstruction Surplus $0 (3)$0 (3)$0 (3) T Less Maintenance Allotment $0 (2)$0 (2)$0 (2) U Cost to be Assessed $2,443,749 $1,863,543 $1,932,381 $0 $6,239,673 (22) V Total Equivalent Single Family/Duplex Lots 497 (12)379 (11)393 (11)1269.0 W Proposed Single Family/Duplex Assessment Rate (PER LOT)$4,917 (12)$4,917 $4,917 $4,917.00 “Commercial & Non-Profit” Property Street Assessment: X Estimated Cost $522,707 $1,088,847 $236,080 $0 Y Less Funds to reach assessment rate $135,715 $81,276 $26,717 $0 Z Cost to be Assessed $386,992 $1,007,571 $209,363 $0 AA Assessable Front Footage (FF)4,388.16 (12)11,425 (11)2,374 (11)0.00 BB Proposed “Commercial &Non-Profit”Property Assessment Rate (PER FRONT FOOT)$88.19 (12)$88.19 $88.19 $119.12 $90.12 $99.44 $0.00 CC Total Net Unfunded Amount (15)$671,099 $500,464 $767,241 $0 $1,938,804 (23) DD Total Cost to be Assessed (25)$3,537,823 $3,610,738 $2,582,985 $0 NOTE: (1) COSTS ARE IN 2012 DOLLARS (2) BEGINNING IN 2012, MAINTENANCE ALLOTMENT WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE STREET MAINTENANCE FUND. (3) NO LONGER USED (4) INCLUDING OTHER COMMUNITY FUNDS (5) BASED ON STREET RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION UNIT COSTS COMPARISON PER PHASE (6) NOT USED (7) BASED ON 7,679.35 ,27,523.98 , &8,644.21 FRONT FEET WITHOUT CURB OR WITH D CURB OR WITH B CURB RESPECTIVELY FOR PROPERTIES WITHOUT CURB OR WITH D CURB OR WITH B CURB RESPECTIVELY (8) BASED ON A CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT OF $18.88 ,$18.88 , &$4.91 PER FRONT FOOT (9) INCLUDES 0% CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY AND 22% LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING (10) BASED ON THE REVISED 2007 OVERALL STUDY UPDATE (11) BASED ON THE 2007 OVERALL STUDY UPDATE (12) BASED ON MOCK ASSESSMENT ROLL (13) BASED ON CORRESPONDENCE WITH CRYSTAL STAFF (14) ALLOTMENT IS BASED ON NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY/DUPLEX LOTS IN EACH OF PHASES 12-14 DIVIDED BY TOTAL NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY/DUPLEX LOTS IN PHASES 12-14 (15) ROW "CC" = ROW "Y"+"S"+"P" (16) FORMULA CALCULATION EQUALS ($4,391,730 x 497 /1,269.0 =$1,720,008 (17) FORMULA CALCULATION EQUALS ($4,391,730 x 379.0 /1,269.0 =$1,311,636 (18) FORMULA CALCULATION EQUALS ($4,391,730 x 393.0 /1,269.0 =$1,360,087 (19) NOT USED / (20) FORMULA CALCULATION EQUALS ($1,720,008 +$1,311,636 +$1,360,087 )=$4,391,730 (21) NOT USED (22) FORMULA CALCULATION EQUALS ($2,443,749 +$1,863,543 +$1,932,381 )=$6,239,673 (23) FORMULA CALCULATION EQUALS ($671,099 +$500,464 +$767,241 )=$1,938,804 (24) BASED ON LEAST EXPENSIVE PHASE 12 ESTIMATED MSA COST PER LF (25) ROW "DD" = ROW "C"+"U"+"Z" PHASE MSA COSTS (1) +22% L, A, E (1) MSA COSTS (1)(9)LOTS FUNDS PLEDGED (1) 12 $1,311,668 $1,600,236 $1,600,236 497 $1,720,008 13 $1,346,793 $1,643,088 (24)$1,643,088 379 $1,311,636 14 $941,317 $1,148,407 (24)$1,148,407 393 $1,360,087 TOTAL $4,391,730 1,269.0 TABLE 1 POTENTIAL MSA FUNDS PLEDGED PHASE CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 2012 - FOREST NORTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-12 ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE STREET RECONSTRUCTION FUND DEFICIT $4,917 Per Lot Single Family/Duplex Property Assessment Rate (0% Phase 11 Increase) Excluding Sanitary and Water Main Improvements SEH NO. CRYST117030 Date: Revised Date: August 31, 2011; September 2, 2011; September 12, 2011 2 4 A YEAR PHASE UNFUNDED AMOUNT (1) CUMULATIVE STREET RECONSTRUCTION FUND DEFICIT (1) B 2011 11 $0 C 2012 12 $671,099 (2)($671,099) D 2013 13 $500,464 (3)($1,171,563) E 2014 ($1,171,563) F 2015 14 $767,241 (3)($1,938,804) (3) BASED ON STREET RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION UNIT COSTS COMPARISON PER PHASE P:\AE\C\Cryst\117030\4Prel\Qtys\[Opinion Cost & Financing PHASE 12 FR.xlsx]Fund Deficit 3 in row v1 (2) BASED ON PHASE 12 OPINION OF PROBABLE COST August 24, 2011 1 3 (1) COSTS ARE IN 2012 DOLLARS Appendix F Street Reconstruction Unit Costs Comparison Per Phase Potential Future Single Family Duplex Assessment Rate Comparison: Current Assessment Rate Trends vs. Projected Construction Cost Trends CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 2012 - FOREST NORTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-12 Street Reconstruction Construction Unit Costs Comparison Per Phase Date: March 19, 2007 Revised: March 27, 2007; September 4, 2008; September 11, 2008; September 15, 2008 Revised: August 31, 2010; September 7, 2010; September 15, 2010; March 28, 2011; May 23, 2011 Revised: August 24, 2011; August 31, 2011; September 2, 2011; September 12, 2011 P:\AE\C\Cryst\117030\4Prel\Qtys\[phase 1 thru 16 unit cost comparison.xlsx]Unit Cost Infl Yr 3 in a row 1 2 3 4 5 6 A Phase Total Construction Costs (1)(2) Total Linear Footage Cost Per Foot Year Percentage Change between Phase (6) B 1 $1,910,682.00 26,000 $73.49 1995 N/A C 2 $2,146,070.00 26,001 $82.54 1996 12.31% D 3 $2,955,272.32 34,496 $85.67 1997 3.79% E 4 $1,983,572.00 22,340 $88.79 1998 3.64% F 1999 G 2000 H 5 $1,833,244.82 15,928 $115.10 2001 29.63% J 2002 K 2003 L 6 $3,497,617.15 31,420 $111.32 2004 -3.28% M 7 $2,430,629.35 21,261 $114.32 2005 2.69% N 8 $3,754,632.48 29,645 $126.65 2006 10.79% O 2007 P 9 $3,909,687.00 25,456 $153.59 2008 21.27% Q 10 $5,838,256.00 41,785 $139.72 2009 -9.03%(3) R 2010 S 11 $3,018,498.00 19,885 $151.80 2011 8.65%(4) T 12 $5,418,272.17 32,240 $168.06 2012 10.71%(8) U 13 $5,100,463.70 28,906 $176.45 2013 4.99%(7) V 2014 W 14 $5,066,919.50 26,051 $194.50 2015 10.23%(7) X 15 $6,056,868.60 29,660 $204.21 2016 4.99%(7) Y 16 $8,197,798.40 38,236 $214.40 2017 4.99%(7) (1) Costs without Sanitary, Watermain, and Private Costs (2) Costs are in year the project was built (Phases 1-11) (3) Based on Phase 10 Mock Final (4) Based on Phase 11 Low Bid (5) 12 Projects over 17 years (6) Cell Formula equal to C4/B4 -1, etc. (7) Based on average annual increase in construction cost between Phase 1 and 12 (8) based on Phase 12 Opinion of Probable Cost (Appendix B) $7 3 . 4 9 $8 2 . 5 4 $8 5 . 6 7 $8 8 . 7 9 $1 1 5 . 1 0 $1 1 1 . 3 2 $1 1 4 . 3 2 $1 2 6 . 6 5 $1 5 3 . 5 9 $1 3 9 . 7 2 $1 5 1 . 8 0 $1 6 8 . 0 6 $1 7 6 . 4 5 $1 9 4 . 5 0 $2 0 4 . 2 1 $2 1 4 . 4 0 $25.00 $50.00 $75.00 $100.00 $125.00 $150.00 $175.00 $200.00 $225.00 $250.00 19 9 5 19 9 6 19 9 7 19 9 8 19 9 9 20 0 0 20 0 1 20 0 2 20 0 3 20 0 4 20 0 5 20 0 6 20 0 7 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 Co s t P e r L i n e a r F o o t Year Street Reconstruction Construction Unit Costs Comparison Per Phase AVERAGE ANNUAL INCREASE IN CONSTRUCTION COST BETWEEN PHASE 1 AND 12: 4.99% (5) CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 2012 - FOREST NORTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY PROJECT NO. 2011-12 Potential Future Single Family Duplex Assessment Rate Comparison Current Assessment Rate Trends vs. Projected Construction Cost Trends Date: September 11, 2008 Revised: September 15, 2009; September 2, 2010; September 7, 2010; September 15, 2010 Revised: March 28, 2011; August 24, 2011; August 31, 2011; September 2, 2011 Revised: September 12, 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (2C/2B)-1, etc.4B-2B, etc. A Phase Single Family/ Duplex Assessment Rate (PER LOT) (1) Percentage Change between Phase Single Family/ Duplex Assessment Rate (PER LOT) (2) Year to Year Difference Year of Construction Number of Years between Projects B 1 $2,782 N/A $2,782 $0 1995 N/A C 2 $2,860 2.8%$2,912 $52 1996 1 D 3 $3,097 8.3%$3,048 ($49)1997 1 E 4 $3,190 3.0%$3,191 $1 1998 1 F 5 $3,385 6.1%$3,660 $275 2001 3 G 6 $4,124 21.8%$4,199 $75 2004 3 H 7 $4,248 3.0%$4,395 $147 2005 1 J 8 $4,248 0.0%$4,601 $353 2006 1 K 9 $4,683 10.2%$5,042 $359 2008 2 L 10 $4,683 0.0%$5,278 $595 2009 1 M 11 $4,917 5.0%$5,783 $866 2011 2 N 12 $4,917 0.0%$6,054 $1,137 2012 1 O 13 $5,163 5.0%$6,337 $1,174 2013 1 (4) P 14 $5,692 10.2%$6,944 $1,252 2015 2 (4) Q 15 $5,977 5.0%$7,269 $1,292 2016 1 (4) R 16 $6,276 5.0%$7,610 $1,334 2017 1 (4) (1) Actual costs are in year the project was built (Phases 1-11) (2) $2,782 Assessment in 1995 Dollars @ 4.99%per year (average annual increase in construction cost between Phase 1 and 12) (3) Not Used (4) Assumes a 5% increase per year from previous Phase P:\AE\C\Cryst\117030\4Prel\Qtys\[phase 1 thru 16 unit cost comparison.xlsx]Assess Analysis 3 in a row Appendix G Crystal Finance Department Street Reconstruction Fund Expenditures Crystal Finance Department Street Reconstruction Funding Sources Appendix H Storm Water Runoff Management and the Use of Rain Gardens Flyer Storm Water Runoff (Runoff) Management and the Use of Rain Gardens: As part of possible local street reconstruction in the Forest North neighborhood, City of Crystal (City) staff will present rain gardens for consideration by both the neighborhood’s residents and the City Council. This flyer explains both runoff management and rain gardens as a list of frequently asked questions and their answers. What is runoff management? The process of managing runoff as a resource rather than a waste product. Runoff has historically been managed by “draining it away” as soon as possible (ASAP). Management by “draining it away” ASAP results in adverse down stream impacts such as, but not limited to, flooding, erosion, and poor water quality in nearby lakes and streams. Crystal is required to submit a permit to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) outlining their plan to better manage its runoff. Part of Crystal’s plan is that new subdivisions feature ponds that both regulate and treat runoff. However, pond construction in established neighborhoods like Forest North is difficult. Crystal must consider other tools to show the MPCA it is better managing its runoff in its established neighborhoods. If the subgrade soils are right, rain gardens are a tool that the City can apply in established neighborhoods to better manage runoff. We will not know if the subgrade soils are right until soil samples in Forest North are analyzed during the summer of 2011. What is a rain garden? A rain garden is a landscaped area located in the City-owned boulevard. As the photo to the right shows, the area is slightly depressed to soak up some of the runoff before it can enter the storm sewer pipe network (network). This decreases the amount of runoff carried by the network to nearby lakes and streams. When plants in the rain garden mature, the rain garden should be disguised as an aesthetic addition to the neighborhood. The plants can also help runoff reach into deeper subgrade soils and recharge nearby groundwater aquifers. The plants also aerate the garden’s soil to maintain its infiltration characteristics. Rain garden plants can handle extended periods of wet conditions. Potential standing water in the rain garden will be designed to dissipate quickly. Why are rain gardens needed? Because of the many impervious surfaces such as streets, driveways and rooftops, it is important to have rain gardens within our cities. Storm water carries pollutants such as fertilizers, pesticides, yard and animal waste, oil and grease, etc. The contaminated water flows from storm drains into local streams, lakes, rivers, and watersheds, and often leads to costly municipal improvements like stormwater treatment structures. Upper and Lower Twin Lakes, where the majority of Crystal’s storm water ends its travels, is listed as “Impaired” by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. While an individual rain garden may seem like a small thing, collectively they produce substantial environmental benefits. Who should consider adding a rain garden in the City-owned boulevard in front of their home? Rain gardens work best in relatively flat boulevards with sandy, well-draining subgrade soils beneath them. Some boulevards cannot accommodate rain gardens due to poor subgrade soils, steep slopes, or not enough space between the edge of the street’s pavement and the right-of-way line. The more rain gardens installed means less runoff carried by the network to nearby lakes and streams. Property owners of corner lots may wish to consider more than one rain garden in the City-owned boulevard. Who maintains these rain gardens in the City-owned boulevard? Rain garden plantings will be selected for low maintenance, which is not to say that they are maintenance free. Yearly maintenance for weeding, mulching, and plant replacement will be conducted by the City for a period of two years after the initial rain garden installation/planting. Individual homeowners will be responsible for weeding, mulching, and plant replacement after the two year City maintenance period, as necessary. Furthermore, individual homeowners will be responsible for watering immediately following the initial rain garden installation/planting. If I choose to have a rain garden, will my assessment be more than those without rain gardens? No. Selecting this work does not add to your individual assessment. The cost of any rain gardens that could be built as part of this project will be passed along to the entire neighborhood because the entire neighborhood will benefit from the rain gardens. What if I just do not want to have a rain garden? If you do not want a rain garden, do not like gardening, or do not wish to add to the landscaping of the City-owned boulevard in front of your home, maybe a rain garden is not for you. Keep in mind: whether you have a rain garden or not, drainage could still be directed to flatter areas located in the City-owned boulevard area next to the street. As with the rain garden, water will pool for short periods of time in these areas until it is able to soak into the ground. Such existing low areas will still function well; however it will not have the same infiltration capabilities as a rain garden can have. During heavy rain events, rainwater in most cases will overflow these areas and spill into the street. How do I notify the City of my interest in having a rain garden or not? Please express your interest by completing the rain garden section of the Property Owner Questionnaire insert and mail it back to Karen Anderson with Short Elliott Hendrickson no later than July 22, 2011. How can I find out more information about rain gardens? The City’s website contains a thorough listing of articles regarding rain gardens in street reconstruction projects. If you want more information, we encourage you to type it into your favorite internet browser and review the rain garden articles it contains. http://www.ci.crystal.mn.us/city_departments/rain_gardens.html For more information on rain gardens in general, please contact: Hennepin County Environmental Services, 612-348-3777 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 651-296-6300 University of Minnesota Yard and Garden Line, 612-624-4771 We suggest that you visit the Phase 9 Cavanagh Oaks and Phase 10 Welcome Park project areas shown in the location map on page 3 of the newsletter to see examples of the rain gardens. If you have questions about rain gardens after reading this flyer, and maybe the information at Crystal’s website, please contact one of the people listed on page 4 of the newsletter that came with this flyer. _ 0 4F L) v/ _ .C� C VI LL N_ O N N U 4- 0 - 0`0 U 0 N 0 Q 0 a L LL L L 0 L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0000 O O O O O O O O O O L L L 0 0 0 O O O E E E `m `m ani n m n n ani ani ani ani ani ani v a m E_ a) E_ E_ m d m m m m m mm m m m m m 0 0 0 o m Y m Y L Y m m m m m m a U a U U a a a a a a o dO o aO oO aO o 0N 0N 0N 0N 0 69� m EA A 69 fA 61*Nl O O O T O T O T O T O T O T a a L a L v L a L a L a L a w 0 m 0 N 0 m a m a N a M a N a {0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O m a o 0 0 0 0 o O O O O m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o L L M M M Q1 U) L L N O N O M O M O t L L L M O )0 O O O M )o M V M U U N M M M N M N N O N O O N Q7 N O M O M 4) U U 0 U N V V )0 )0 V I� W m U) M W O O O O N N N O O O O O O v) r m m O O O O O O O O O O O1 m O O O O O O O O m m O1 O1 OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L L N 6 6 6 M6 6 O L L N O M O 6 O 6 O L L L L M O 6 O 6 O M fl W M V M U U N M M M N M O N O N U U N 0 N 0 M m M W UQUO O OV LO O N N N O O O O O O O c c C c c c Ol Ol O O O O O O O O O O m Ol O O O O O O O O Ol 0 0 m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O o O O O O O O O U U N M M M N M a0 N O N DO N W N W M W M m U U U U N V V f� O) )0 O) W O O O N N N O O O O O O O < r c c c c c c c c T a T a T a T a a a a T a T a T a T 0 M a a T a a T T T a a T T a a T T a a m c m c m C m c c c c c C m C Co C m c m m c c m m c c m m m c c m m c c m m c c _ a m a m a m a v v m m m a y a d v m v a m m a a w y a a a y y a v y y a v m m Y Y y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y Y y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y y Y Y Y Y Y Y y Y ^ N a)N m a) m N a) a) a) d N m a) m a) a) a) 0) a) m 0 a) a) N m a) m a) a) a) m a) a) a) a) N m a) 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 4) 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3; 1) 3 3 3 3 1) a :N O n a) _ a m 0 O m 0 v a m M Cl) m N N a •- N N CO M V V N N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m m m m m m 0)mmmmmmm y m y y 0 y y y m m m m m m m m m m m m m m U U U U co U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U L L L L m m m m m m m m m m 0 C C 0 C C G c c C c c c c c c c C c d d m d a) m d Q) >;>> 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O c c c c c c c c c c n n n n d c c m c c c c m m O O O O U U U U U U U U U U W W W W W W W W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C a) C C C C m d m m a) m m w d m N m m m m m m m m m m (D ♦- N N N N N M M M M V V V V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 an a an an rn rn rn an an an rn rn an rn rn rn an m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B m v v 2 m v m B m m va m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) aN) aN) 0) aN) 0) aN) 0) 0 w CD 0)) 0)) aN) 4)) aN) aN) c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c_ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C 0 C C C C C r d m m m d v w d d m f m m w m 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 0 0 )O U) )0 N 10 0 10 0 )O 0 )O U) )0 10 0 0 0 )0 0 un N 0 0 )O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 N N N N N N NPI. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n N N N r N n N n n r N n N N n n r N n n CN N n N r r N n n N r r N N N r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d d N N N N 4) N N N d N N N d d N d N d N 0) U) N N d N N d N d N N N N 0) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w a) a) v v a a ma) N m coN a m a m m N N v a > > 0 M > > M �N.. > co L L L L C C O C O C O C D) O_ U U U U ca co C (a C m c ca c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 O O O O O O O O L L L 0 0 0 O O O E E E `m `m ani n m n n ani ani ani ani ani ani v a m E_ a) E_ E_ m d m m m m m mm m m m m m 0 0 0 o m Y m Y L Y m m m m m m a U a U U a a a a a a o dO o aO oO aO o 0N 0N 0N 0N 0 69� m EA A 69 fA 61*Nl O O O T O T O T O T O T O T a a L a L v L a L a L a L a w 0 m 0 N 0 m a m a N a M a N a {0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O m a o 0 0 0 0 o O O O O m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o L L M M M Q1 U) L L N O N O M O M O t L L L M O )0 O O O M )o M V M U U N M M M N M N N O N O O N Q7 N O M O M 4) U U 0 U N V V )0 )0 V I� W m U) M W O O O O N N N O O O O O O v) r m m O O O O O O O O O O O1 m O O O O O O O O m m O1 O1 OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L L N 6 6 6 M6 6 O L L N O M O 6 O 6 O L L L L M O 6 O 6 O M fl W M V M U U N M M M N M O N O N U U N 0 N 0 M m M W UQUO O OV LO O N N N O O O O O O O c c C c c c Ol Ol O O O O O O O O O O m Ol O O O O O O O O Ol 0 0 m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O o O O O O O O O U U N M M M N M a0 N O N DO N W N W M W M m U U U U N V V f� O) )0 O) W O O O N N N O O O O O O O < r c c c c c c c c T a T a T a T a a a a T a T a T a T 0 M a a T a a T T T a a T T a a T T a a m c m c m C m c c c c c C m C Co C m c m m c c m m c c m m m c c m m c c m m c c _ a m a m a m a v v m m m a y a d v m v a m m a a w y a a a y y a v y y a v m m Y Y y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y Y y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y y Y Y Y Y Y Y y Y ^ N a)N m a) m N a) a) a) d N m a) m a) a) a) 0) a) m 0 a) a) N m a) m a) a) a) m a) a) a) a) N m a) 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 4) 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3; 1) 3 3 3 3 1) a :N O n a) _ a m 0 O m 0 v a m M Cl) m N N a •- N N CO M V V N N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m m m m m m 0)mmmmmmm y m y y 0 y y y m m m m m m m m m m m m m m U U U U co U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U L L L L m m m m m m m m m m 0 C C 0 C C G c c C c c c c c c c C c d d m d a) m d Q) >;>> 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O c c c c c c c c c c n n n n d c c m c c c c m m O O O O U U U U U U U U U U W W W W W W W W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C a) C C C C m d m m a) m m w d m N m m m m m m m m m m (D ♦- N N N N N M M M M V V V V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 an a an an rn rn rn an an an rn rn an rn rn rn an m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B m v v 2 m v m B m m va m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) aN) aN) 0) aN) 0) aN) 0) 0 w CD 0)) 0)) aN) 4)) aN) aN) c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c_ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C 0 C C C C C r d m m m d v w d d m f m m w m 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 0 0 )O U) )0 N 10 0 10 0 )O 0 )O U) )0 10 0 0 0 )0 0 un N 0 0 )O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 N N N N N N NPI. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n N N N r N n N n n r N n N N n n r N n n CN N n N r r N n n N r r N N N r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d d N N N N 4) N N N d N N N d d N d N d N 0) U) N N d N N d N d N N N N 0) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J� U N 0 O L `d E L L L W c c c a 0 0 0 — M :N E .y E E y N y y N y 'm O O O O O O O O 0 W n d d n a n n n 0 w a n a D d) ID Vm YU YU YU V�0 v amW v v'mO vy a -0 'mO E W EWEEW m m__ m m o o o mmmm W L t O O OOO OOOO O O O >0 � U oO o O= � C V V M U M M L V L L L L 'm0 Locoz O W _ _ L m O N O O 0 W a m a m a m a W a 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O W O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W . m m m m 0 O O O O O o o O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 N m N N M OM M m a r 0 0 0 n V OO OO OO m m m m OO Oo oO >W > O 0 0 0 V 10 t0 LO r 0 O O W O O o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O o O O O O O 0 W o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Q) m m m m co r� m 0 of <+i ri of 0 of 0 of ao of a 0 0 0 0 0 O O rO g O O m m m M M O O O > > N M 0 �0 r d' 10 O r V �O r r O tF � a M O O O O C C C O O W O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 o O O O O O O O O O N W m m Ol 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O o o O O o o O O O O d N M m W W of r m 0 6 6 ci 6 0 of 0 of ao ao 6 6 0 0 0 m `m 6 6 0 0 0 L L L L r N m N v M a M m v r M o o 0 a o 0 0 m m M M o 0 0 >> 0 0 0 0 U U U U N Cl) a m N 10 r O r r 0r r O 7 r a LO c c c c T T O T W T V 'O c W c 'O c c c a V V m m C C m m m c c m Co C C m m c c W C C c c C C C C W c C C 0 c 'D V W W 'O 'O W W � 'O W W W N N W W W W W W W N W N N W Y y y y y Y y Y Y Y Y y Y Y Y Y Y y Y Y Y Y Y y y y y Y Y Y Y Y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 a N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 o O O o M m W W W m W N W m m m m W W N N m L W W W co W W W W co W W W W W W W W O U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U} E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E OO O OOOOOO OOOO O O O O O m m m m m m m m W m m m m W m W m m E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E EE N U N U N U U U U U N N fn U N U N U l0 N l0 A N W f0 f0 l0 l0 l0 N l0 W l0 l0 l0 l0 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m � d o o n W W 0 0, o o a � d W o m W o W o d on v o d d on v o o o o W o O N W O O N i m n W W n W W L o n n o n o. Lo o 0 O N o n N N O N nN N W c o o o o. v o o a s v O N c W W v 0 v c W W U i >. T T r O O Z' !. T T Y O o U (7 C7 C7 Y moo, Qo, U U U U' Y �o m co M co M co M M v V V < V a V c L W W co W W W W W W W W W W W n U U U U U U U U U U U U U U O` U N N N N N N N N N a) N N N N E C C C C C c c c c C c C c C o 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o 0 o E o. o. n W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U :� U U U U U U U U U U U U U U d d d d m w d d oo m m m m O) m m m m m m m m m N O c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 'v 'v 'v 'a '5 z a) m v o v a v v v v v v v v v v M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M o O 0 M M M M 0 0 O M M 0 I0 0 l0 10 0 N LO 0 0 0 0 m 10 0 0 0 0 to 0 10 0 N N N 0 0 m 0 N N N L0 LO a a v v V v a a v, v 'Q V V v N N N v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a�3 `W `W `W `W d d a ro�3 �5� d Q `W d� v d ro ro d d ro�5 `W `W d `W ro d `W d L L_ L_ L_ L_ --E; L_ L_ L L L_ L L_ L L L L_ L_ L t_ L L L_ L_ L L_ L_ :E; LL L_ L_ L_ L_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U c d U N IL v m v >> > > > > > > 0 > 0 0 > > > > w 0 0 N t L (0 L L N L L N L G N t L L L N G L N O n n m a a m a a m a n m n n m a a m a m m a n m (» 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o y Q) 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 O O O M O (O 6 N 6 N 6 N 07 O 6 6 N O 6 N O gO7 U U 0 N M O2 M '1 N a N U U U N M 00 0 0 r� W W O > O O O < M O O O N N N O C C C C C C N p� O O O O O O O O O m 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O o O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M N N N N N N NU U UU U U 0 U) > Cl) N (0 (D O O O O O O O C C C C C C (V m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o d oO o o 0 0 0 N M �0 h O O r m (D O > O O Cl) O O O N 10 N O C C C C C C N T l0 C C 07 C C l0 C C f0 C C 07 C C M C C (0 C C (7 C C C d d 'O d d V d d v 01 d 'O d d d d d d v d d 0 <n Y y y Y Y Y Y Y y Y y y Y y y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y y N d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N m w r N N a r N M M M V�� r r N N N r r r r r M M M V a V r r r r r r r r r O 0 O O O r O r O r r O 0 r r r O 0 0 d 01 0 o Ol O1 O 0 o O) O) O) 0 o OJ O) d 0 d o O) O1 OJ rn 0 0 N d d d d d d d d d d d d U U U U U U U U U U U U N N N N N N Nl N N N N N .N. r v w w w w ,.N. w r .N. .h.. C C C C C C C C C C C C (0 H C C C C C d d d C d C d C C d d C C C d d d d d d d d d d dd d E Q) d > > > > > > > > > d d > > > > d > > d d > > > d d d > > d d > > > > d d d d L (E2 d d d d d d d d d d d d y N N N N 0 0 N N 0 o N j m N N N N N r r r r r N r N r 2 N r r 0 0 0 r r r r O O O r r r O O O r r O O r r r r0 O O O O O T 0 0 0 0 0 n n n n n 0 n 0 n 0 0 n n 0 0 0 n n n n N N N N N N N N N N N N CL N N N N N Vl N N N N N N E O N N 0) N N N N N N N N N T T E. E. T E. E+ E. E E T T E+ T E. E. E. T E E. E. E. E. E. N U cD C7 U U cD (D C7 C7 C9 C7 (9 0 0 cD c9 0 C9 cD (D 0 C7 C7 c7 C7 n d —— N N N N N N N N N N N N O Q' N N 0 w co co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O M M M M M r r r r r N N N N N M n N M r N M M r r N N M M M r r n N N N M N N M M r r N N M M M r n n N N N M M r r N N M M M M r r n n N N N N co co r n N N E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T U D T T T T T T T C7 C7 C7 U' C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 (7 (7 U' C7 C7 U (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 (7 N N N N N tll N N N N N N N N N h N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 0 0 0 U 0 U w O O O )O O O 0 0 0 0 O O (O 10 10 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O N O O O O O O O O N N O N N O N O O O O O O )n r r rr O M �0 (O O V 0 0 r r O r_ r O r N m r 0 O O m N N O r O r N N N N N o) m > O O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 O O O O O O y O (0 ON Cl! O O O O O O O O N N O N N O N O O O O O O )o rrrOmoOOvow OrrOr oOO N .o) >O (V O O O )O O O O O O O O O o o 0 0 0 t`0 0 O O O O O O N vi r r' v o ri vi co o v ori ai a v o v o N ri r vi o o m N N O r O r N N N N N N N O 07 > O O O o E E E E (o (o (o (o w m w C N N C C p w C O O_ NO) o O w C U O > C N L N C) l0 m n C to 0 a � N C) O A N L a C m O �_ N O o� N L E a o m m o E 'E )p G m a w yc n E E n E E E o 0 E d d E p n w m n L E LD °? E c �_ (a w 3 3 a 'c c c m c 0 3 w Y >� E > > > co > V Y m N N 3 3 C C C C O O O w - O y U 3 m i i O O O O w w N D1 O) O (D L ll a > ata m m m m L A 0) 0) 0) ££ `w w `m c o c w p D m w w c v v N v aci w aci aci o `o `o ° > > > c c n o C) N C) C C C O N d d N > > C C N n C L L L - O) C) O) C1 O) O! O) O) i O) w w O ¢ U U « N C C C C C C C C O O O O O O c l0 w w w X m m m m m m m m O O) O) O O) O) ON v 2, Cp w 0 U w n n n n n n n U U U d m 6 m 6 m m m d m mz o ''¢¢ N 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 P 2 m T 2 2 2 mo m m m i 2 m 0 0 0 in in in n in in in in in in rnn in in in in in U (Wi LL a (00 (00 (00 (D(D(00 (00 (00 (00 (00 (00 0 ( LO 00 t0 t00 (00 (00 (00 (00 t00 N 009 M M N N 0 v v v v v v v v a v v v v v v a v v v at It 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E E E 'E E E E E E E E E€ `w d `w `w `w d `w `w `w d d `w `m d w `w d (D `) w £ w £ w £ w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C c c c C c C c c C c c C C c c C c c C c C C W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W c O > r V 2T _ - X w w n w C a 0 O O m p O ¢ O p O ¢ O O O O C U O O U O O _ p _ p _ O 0 w Cwn 0_i d O «-N «w« T m N N m N N o 'w E E 0 w w w m d w N 0 O w a w w O w w -N w a a -O O a a a w¢ a z a¢ a z a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O )O O O 0 0 0 0 O O (O 10 10 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O N O O O O O O O O N N O N N O N O O O O O O )n r r rr O M �0 (O O V 0 0 r r O r_ r O r N m r 0 O O m N N O r O r N N N N N o) m > O O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 O O O O O O y O (0 ON Cl! O O O O O O O O N N O N N O N O O O O O O )o rrrOmoOOvow OrrOr oOO N .o) >O (V O O O )O O O O O O O O O o o 0 0 0 t`0 0 O O O O O O N vi r r' v o ri vi co o v ori ai a v o v o N ri r vi o o m N N O r O r N N N N N N N O 07 > O O O o E E E E (o (o (o (o w m w C N N C C p w C O O_ NO) o O w C U O > C N L N C) l0 m n C to 0 a � N C) O A N L a C m O �_ N O o� N L E a o m m o E 'E )p G m a w yc n E E n E E E o 0 E d d E p n w m n L E LD °? E c �_ (a w 3 3 a 'c c c m c 0 3 w Y >� E > > > co > V Y m N N 3 3 C C C C O O O w - O y U 3 m i i O O O O w w N D1 O) O (D L ll a > ata m m m m L A 0) 0) 0) ££ `w w `m c o c w p D m w w c v v N v aci w aci aci o `o `o ° > > > c c n o C) N C) C C C O N d d N > > C C N n C L L L - O) C) O) C1 O) O! O) O) i O) w w O ¢ U U « N C C C C C C C C O O O O O O c l0 w w w X m m m m m m m m O O) O) O O) O) ON v 2, Cp w 0 U w n n n n n n n U U U d m 6 m 6 m m m d m mz o ''¢¢ N 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 P 2 m T 2 2 2 mo m m m i 2 m 0 0 0 in in in n in in in in in in rnn in in in in in U (Wi LL a (00 (00 (00 (D(D(00 (00 (00 (00 (00 (00 0 ( LO 00 t0 t00 (00 (00 (00 (00 t00 N 009 M M N N 0 v v v v v v v v a v v v v v v a v v v at It 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E E E 'E E E E E E E E E€ `w d `w `w `w d `w `w `w d d `w `m d w `w d (D `) w £ w £ w £ w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C c c c C c C c c C c c C C c c C c c C c C C W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Q i W c 0 C C N m a U U (U L L O L N N n O U U m d C O 0 O O O O C 3 C a m w w W m E m m m 0 v v a L m _ m m N C m N 0 E a + + n YE y m l0 fA N N O U U T 0. I N m O N N O U U N a m m LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O o o o o o a E 0 o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 ' O O O O O OO O O N O O O O O O O O O 0 10 0 N N O 0 O O O O O O O 10 M Cl) O O O O O ? O N V 'O U G r r r m O e N j O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O (O O 10 N N N N O 0 O O O O O O O f0 M (`7 m N N NN N V) 0) O O O O O 'V (O r r N It IT O O O O O 1 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O (0 N N N O N N O 0 O O 0 O O O O (0 N N Cl) CO O O O O O 7 O r N V r 5 I O c m f I 1 O C a `c I c U r N U ca y > T c O V U U m L O w w N N E E E E (0 (fl (fl l0 m m m m N N N N ( ( IL (L v v v v 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 > c a O m U m U N C C 3p a C O O O Q) N m m N m U U i C C E E Q z O ClO v v 000 o O O I d d N N N d d N N N d d N N N N 01 N N E l L L 0 0 L L 0 0 L 0 L .0 L L 0 0 L 0 L L o 0 t L o 0 L L 0 0 L L 0 0 L 0 L 0 a i m a) d m m fu d m m d Z Z Z U U U U U U C U U C U U U U N N N C C m m C C m m C m m C m m C m C m I C C m m o o m I C C 1 LL LL Ll C C lL ll C ll C LL C C LL li C IL C LL C C LL LL LL LL y y LL (L ll li ll _ O V N _ .C� C 75 v LL N r O N r N U 4- 0 U d H O Q 0 a U U U U U U U U o O 0 0 mmmmm J J J J J mmmin J J J (yy O N N N N N N N N N 66666 O O O O O O O O 3 W o N W W W W W W W W .0 w 0 O m 10 N m W (0 w .. N J W J yW E E E E EE W W W W E V y E° c n O O O O O W O O O U W W W O N J W y M M M M M c N w w + W C T T T T T O T >� T Ol N O a 0 0 0 O o O O O O O O O O C W W O O t0 O N O O O O O O U U 10 N N N N N 'S. ' 'a N W 'a N d 'a N m n m a a X X m X X X X X X `o X X 'd X `W X m W W W W W W W W n r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00000 O O O O O O 0000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W W ! w O O O O O o o O o O O O o 0 0000 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 WOO O O O 10 O N 6666 cid" 0 0 66666 W m N m C C O O r N O N (D r r o N 10 O o N (7 M 10 O r r c c 0 0 r O r 0 O m 10 U_ U_ w c 2 J yW U U W W W W W W W X X E2 ) C W W W O N J W y Q '? W W W W N L j w w O O O O o O o o 0 O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O o O a 0 0 0 O o O O O O O O O O W W W O O t0 O N O O O O O O U U 10 O O O 10 C C W W c O N f` f0 r r O N 10 O O N M M N O r O O O (h fy m J U WN L y y U U U N y w 0) N N N0 U a C N d d N N N c r 1. C d C CO 1 N N N c ° N W h "- E N ° ... O W O O O O o O O o O O O W W J J O o O o O w w O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O d a EO o o 6 o N O O O O O Ci N Il) O O O 10 U_ r N r r O N 10 O O N M M 10 O r r Y 15 co r O r w O M 10 U_ onaaaCo= o o O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 >0 E o o C 0 o c o o o o o + `m o o o o o C C C C C C l0 N l0 C C W ° C C C C (0 l0 C C C C l0 111 C C C C C l9 N N \ W W W W W W > y y y y > N N N N C i5r l0 (0 l0 (0 (0 l0 l0 l0 l0 a O O W W N (0 - 9 a d T T T >. T 0 c v U U_ C C C W W E T a n N ill E c c c0 N c c N N c c E LO N N OO a a O O O a a a¢ V W W w ly axi W w W W w w¢ 10 10 Cl) O + a a O O o O 10 10 1n 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O o O W W ! w O O O O O o o O o O O O o 0 0000 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 o 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 WOO O O O 10 O N 6666 cid" 66666 W m N m C C O O r N O N (D r r o N 10 O o N (7 M 10 O r r L r O r 0 O m 10 U_ U_ w c 2 J yW W W W W W W X X E2 N C W W W O N J W y Q '? C W W N L j w w O O O O o O o o 0 O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O o O o o O o O O O O O O O O W W O O O O t0 O N O O O O O O N 10 O O O 10 C C W W O O r N O N f` f0 r r O N 10 O O N M M N O r O O O (h U U w N U WN L y y U O O N y w 0) X X d E i N0 U a C N N N N N c r 1. C d C CO 1 N N N c ° N W h "- E N ° W W O O O O O O o O O o O O O o O o O o O w w O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O W W O O o o 6 o N O O O O O Ci N Il) O O O 10 U_ r N r r O N 10 O O N M M 10 O r r v a v r O r w O M 10 U_ onaaaCo= o o O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o o O 0 0 0 o o C 0 o c o o o o o X X o o o o o o C C C C C C l0 N l0 C C W C C N C C C C (0 l0 C C C C l0 111 C C C C C l9 N N \ W W W W W W > y y y y > N N N N N l0 (0 l0 (0 (0 l0 l0 l0 l0 N W W W W N (0 C N O T T T >. T 0 U_ U U_ C C C W W E T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y y o 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O o O l0 NO O O O 0. O O O 10 o O O O O O > > O O O O m N O 10 N O 10 10 C 10 10 10 10 10 N Cl) r O O O O O O O O O o y y O O O O O O O O O O O O o O o O O O O O OO O O O o O O O O N l0 O O O O 0. O o O 10 O O O O O O > > O O O O m N O 10 O 0 o O O O 10 10 10 10 N M r o O O O O O O O o O y y O O O O O O O o o O O o O o O O O O O O 0 o O O o O o O O Ol0 flf O o O O 10 O O O 10 O O O O O O > > O O O O M N O 1n N o 10 N O 10 10 10 10 10 10 M r 6 6 E E to co E, LL C O f W m N � N L t W o w c 2 J yW W W W W W W N E2 N C W W W O N J W y Q '? C W W N L j n , LL m' L) E a t D aE w 'O N yW„ A C 4 ° v m m E E l0 T C 0 . °3 c.. ayi ayi ayi C 0 _ ° N 0 D E N W W O O O .v .vim w N U WN L y y U O O N y w 0) d d E i N0 U a C N N N N N c w N CW 1. C d C CO 1 N N N c ° N W h "- E N ° E > j V c d) N Z d y C W y N y 2 c N N W rn IT m :+ O > 1 J N y n w N a 0 o c o o w cr d' C ¢ Q U U U w w W o 0 o l0 (A O >ca OD LO N N N � NJN N dCo mm C C t`O') 'R V '7 V V' v a v v v a v C c onaaaCo= o o O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o o O 0 0 0 o o C 0 o c o o o o o o o o o o o o o C C C C C C l0 N l0 C C W C C N C C C C (0 l0 C C C C l0 111 C C C C C l9 N N W W W W W W W W > y y y y > N N N N N N N > a a a y w N N N N W W W W N WW C N O N O N N N O O O C U_ U_ U U_ C C C W W E c c c c c N ill E c c c0 N c c N c N N c c E U U J J¢ OO a a O O O a a a¢ V W W w ly W W w w W w W W w w¢ 10 10 Cl) O O O O o O 10 10 1n 10 10 0 10 10 O O O NN It v v v O N a w N v w w w N N N v v v O O O N N N v a v w to N N v v O N v O O w N N N a v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y y o 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O o O l0 NO O O O 0. O O O 10 o O O O O O > > O O O O m N O 10 N O 10 10 C 10 10 10 10 10 N Cl) r O O O O O O O O O o y y O O O O O O O O O O O O o O o O O O O O OO O O O o O O O O N l0 O O O O 0. O o O 10 O O O O O O > > O O O O m N O 10 O 0 o O O O 10 10 10 10 N M r o O O O O O O O o O y y O O O O O O O o o O O o O o O O O O O O 0 o O O o O o O O Ol0 flf O o O O 10 O O O 10 O O O O O O > > O O O O M N O 1n N o 10 N O 10 10 10 10 10 10 M r 6 6 E E to co LL C O f N 0 N W x E � N N t W o N y W W W W W W N i W W O O y Q '? W W W W W W W n , LL m' L) E E 'N C C J 'O E E ° v m m E E m E o E . °3 c.. ayi ayi ayi H > O N O O O .v .vim w W n a L y y C C R p 1 U rn 10 W W y d E i W W W C LL W W >_ > J 3 O l N N to C C C >> J w N CW C C C W /0 W C CO 1 N N m 2 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W ` O C O. mo 1 rn rn rn rn rn rn IT m :+ O > 1 W W W fa E v n o 0 o c o o w cr d' > Q ¢ Q U U U w t1 J C 0 (r0 (n0 O O O l0 (A O l0 0 OD LO N N N N N 't'Q C C t`O') 'R V '7 V V' v a v v v a v C c c c c •C o o O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o 0 o o O 0 0 0 o o C 0 o c o o o o o o o o o o o o o C O m i W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E E N N C C N N C C N N N C C C N C `WC L yy W W W W W W U U U U U U O U L L_ CL n. 0 U U U U U U 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn rn rn rn rn rn IT m !T Ol m 01 (T IA O1 01 lT 1A 01 rn fn rn lr rn lr rn rn m rn rn rn rn of In rn lr t t t C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c c •C •C c •C c c c •C c C •C •C C c 'C •C C c C c c c c •C I l0 W W lC a) J O J J J J O O O O J J J O O O J J O O J J J O O O J O J O J J O O J J O O C C T N C N C C C C C l0 N l0 C C W C C N C C C C (0 l0 C C C C l0 111 C C C C C l9 N N x x I x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x a a a a a a a a L L a a a a n. a a a N IL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 O O m o O O 10 OO O f f0 O 10 O O O O O 10 NN O � �- m N N � O N m f0 10o > > o N o O N f0 O N 10 th r N r r r N ]o O O O O O O O O O O y y OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 10 O O N S O 10N 'N O 10 O N O O o f0 lfi h o o O O O 10 N N 10 O N't f` F 'm 10 10 0 > > t N N N 0 O N 10 M r N r r r N c 0 O L O 0 fu N c U » V N N l0 n N N fU U lV N N C o J N J U U_ L U -,o N N N O > O J J L C C N 'n 0 0 YO O N x xx x O N O O UO G YO W «0 YO 1 6.2 (p m W n :F= N N N N N N N N N N (D J y c '- U N C N C T O N E>>>> co j N N m t ac 3 3 Ip N i m m a`I m o`I ro d o �. f0 w w N n N w n n n+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � n n I") ID o o O ql O O o 0 O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O N l0 O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O E v V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O r N O O O O 10 O O O O N O 6 O O O O O N N N O 10 •- N f7 {h V O N 07 10 10 O > > 10 N O O N O O N N C p 10 Cl) o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 O O m o O O 10 OO O f f0 O 10 O O O O O 10 NN O � �- m N N � O N m f0 10o > > o N o O N f0 O N 10 th r N r r r N ]o O O O O O O O O O O y y OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 10 O O N S O 10N 'N O 10 O N O O o f0 lfi h o o O O O 10 N N 10 O N't f` F 'm 10 10 0 > > t N N N 0 O N 10 M r N r r r N c L O N j y U N N fU � n a ax x r o N L N 'n d � a .- 1 c '- co t ac 3 3 v v N O E v V a n w ' > fu w w N 46 (`p w O N N w N O N C p N m m w o f E >• .� o y c 4- .2 .m fu w fa �. n m n O o .0 N d .N. O N G O y .O J N 'C C s fU >. N a N o W y >. n fu p O m N >, a o m a c rn v v v rn rn E d 1) a a a N d c y c �- o N J C J J J N O C C �0 > N N N O V O l0 fU a o. N U E U N N N n W N N o '� o. V .v II o u) ° y N N aci aci n° E E E oo o' a p ,o d a E a d U U N f0 (0 N N fU •C N u E!'� CO E E E E a c o c v U . rn IT ' o o m o m m o a°� u N N N N C _ U U U `0 ` ❑ ❑ ¢ Q ¢ Q ❑ a ❑ to > aa) �oo m m `m `m E 2 Z Z o C O O O O O O O O N 4 u N u N u N N f0 f0 E E x l0 E N N E E N N E E l0 E l0 E l0 E a n n n a fon N N y Q 3 c 3 0 LL Q Q a ¢c Q¢ C¢ Q Q Q U U U U U LL LL LL ii a a (L N N 10 co tl) a) m O O O O tp 10 O O O O N N N f0 a v o 1 N 0 o 0 0 f0 w o v N o f0 0 f0 0 o O O o o O r n r n o O w o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O o 0 0 0 co c w fU N N N ' L J J a 0 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 NN N d N O) N N N N N N N N d N fU N N N N N N N N U U_ U_ U U U_ U U U U 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O i s a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a U W O NM C m O U N L N U O C N � 0) a L D A D D N m 0 m m m m m > a) a) 0 0 0 o c c c c o y y U U U U U U p 0) N C C m m m m m m O a a d d d d N N Oa a C C C C C C C C m 0) a) 0 N O O O O O O O O O O > > > > 0) 0) > L L N N N N N N N N ` ` U U O Om +V+Vw O O C C C C C C N W 0) 0) N N 0) 0) N 0) O O N N m m m co m m L L a) a) y a) y y N N n a y y_ n a v a y y d d Oo 0o rn rn a E E E n a a a a n d `m m m m m m m m m 00 00 00 00 m m 0 0 m m Oo an d y n n v v v v a v a CL n a> > 0 0 0 0 >> ss fn a a 0 a s n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>> o 0 0 L0 0 0 0 0 o N o a CO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 c0 0 0 O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O r O N N O O 0 O O O O r O O W) O O O N O 0 O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O p p t0 r � n O O N � p p O p O O O O O O N N p p O O O O O p p O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r v 00 N w m O) N N N N NN M N 0 r ONO V V7 M6 m m m C N N6 M y a r r W NM rn V' 10 t0 n aO.r e0+ + ♦ + + co Y w a0+ O w V u7 V' N Y N > > Y {") N N O O M M N 'Q w O O d N O O O > p O O O O O )p m O O O O O O O O t� > > > r r r r r r M r r N O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O o o LO LO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O n n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OD W O 0. N . N m M N M NrN ONMW N N M M M NO n v r r v CO + + + + M N >> m V N O N M co m pLO co OO N N N N O O O O OO O 0 d m m O O m m m m 0000 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O > > > > r O O M (O O N O O O O O OO O O O N N O O O O O O �O FO O o � o Iq o O O i0 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N r O O O O O O D W0 0j N NN +N O M N M N0 M OO N m m m 0v�Nf o Oo O��o v +N + M O0ovavuvv>> 1" o rurvra N N N N O O N m m m m O O r O o O O O D) > > > > O N N O N 'Q' O N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m c m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m C C C C C C C 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N N 0) m 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) N m m m a) N m a) a) 0) N N N N N 0) N 0) m 0) 0) N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) m 0) N 0) 0 0 N �a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y N N y a C 0) C N m v 'O y C C N O O C m ami � z r v w 0 0 o ami d c C C 0) O N c O) C V C C N O D C N -02 C C N 0) d C C m C 1 7 m m0CC N a� n0c aN Y V O'NO CO °mO o � 0 E E v a 2 aim N Ny m m OO N C O O c N OO OO N d O n a d m oO O m c-0 V0a o o c -- EE�N� L'o d) 00222=022=0z00N 0 p am NNNNNU U a L m m C C U U N N m m m m V Y w m m d d N m m N O O O O m m N O C C a s v rn rn 5 5-- a a a a a a a a N N N N.. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N M N h M LO M N t0 N N LO O U) o LO u') LO o LO LO h N LO LO h N O M N N )t') O h M 0 0 N LO O N 0 O O U) U) U) to U) N t0 N 10 10 in m LO N LO LO v v a v v v v v v v v v v v v a v v v a v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N NN N NN O O NO NN NN NN NN NO NN NN NN NN N N ON NO N N NN NN NM MN N N r r N N c � N a) V C N N N C 0) 0 N C U C c N O N y N m N E O O O E O O m m d > > U N m c v C U U d d (D 0) N X XO O c c C O O n a O 0) 0 N N 0 J J > > O O > N O > > > > > > > > > > > > 'F- ¢ ¢ C¢¢¢ a a a a¢¢ n OO O O O O O O O O O O o O co O O O O O O O 0 (O O (0 ti Li 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u )O co O) O ON 11 It UO O N N N N N M M M M M M M A N N N N N N N N N N N N N ����mmd�dmmm�mmmmmm�m��mmmmmm� m��vv��dmm�,mm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C c C C C c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c C C C c c c C C c c C c C C O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m m m m 0) 01 N 0) N C) N d 0) 0) a) N 0) 0) N 0) N m 0) m N m 01 N 0) m O) N O) 0) a) m m a) 0) 0) a) 0) 0) m 0) 0) m U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q: 2 Q: Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q K Q K w Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q � � O C C a N > C C C C U U O O °c N U L d N N N N �. �. C O Lam Oo C O O y U U v -.O m m m m u T T C y O O O O N N N o o o O O O O r N O Lo N N o M fn (D U M U h U (V W o > y N y N > y N > > N c C c C C c C C, 'Fu C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N co N N N N N N N N N N N a ami a E a U N n a a n c o m Ol c N E c a U y y r C C o a n n D. p, a ° 0 C m 0 O C _ E C a) C E _ m m m m m r x c c c c °� °a o o °n �. U NN N N N c N N m U w C `1 N N N O la 71 J J J J c d V V V U o c E > > ` N m C v m N N y N N d L n o>;>>CD _ O T T C O O > r N N N N N a ! m C v v O U N T V U) Or N ' 2 N N O E2 f2 0 ° N N j 'O 'O 0 O o a O O 'O 1ccccccc 'O 'O 'O c vv m m in n co U) O d io U'Oc) c'nOc W O LO N N J w U U U U m c`s°o� (a co C C h a n n m N a n ,Lr T al al a) m O 0 L L > NNN N N M N N E ' E V v N N O > 0 > J N O N d N m U T LO 0 r N m U N a L L 0 w U U 0 0 O 0 a C C C C U a O O O O V C m m N m m y c o n c �, �a 00 N '00 V U m m 4 d C O Z J N o N N N O` c 0 0 W w `m N d C y N n N N y N O O O O O ° a a a a +. w w w Mn w w j O U w 0 � N E OOOO E Z °i na Ld U) U) U) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 1LL > m m m d m m m m 0 0 °d 0 00 mmmm ° awww12 E' O O O O O O m m m m aOm d m c c m d a m w c m d m � m °1O O< O O< r 0 N 0 O NNO o aa O OOOO >>>> O00O > yo 0O 0O 0O 0O o< OO O< C -i C6N > U �U � U U .16 >� NN0 W 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N y N 0 0 0 0 N< O M < O O 10 M M O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 O aJ J 'O s a V O. v a t v v vv < N O << N O O O N M O o d o 0 0 0 10 0 °� o Lq y y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri u°i > 6 C'i co ° ° 1°» 10 0 NN .c ca o `m o O 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 `o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 vi 0 0 iri vi cn << d j > >> o V o o LO co M 0 0 N 0 0 V r 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO O O O <<< V a 'O a < < < N a n N O N N N o o o O O O O r N O Lo N N o M fn (D U M U h U (V W o > y N y N > y N > > N c C c C C c C C, 'Fu C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N co N N N N N N N N N N m m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c c c N a) m m N (DOOM a) m 0 0 0 N WOW O O O > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > N N N N m N m N a) N N a) a) a) a) N a) m m m m N N N N N N N N 0) N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 N a a a a a n n n a n n n n n n a a a a y m $? E c C C m Ol o v 0 2 N E c U y O r C C d N N 0 C O � U C a) N y � NN N N N c N N m U m U C `1 N N N O ° N V V V C N > > ` N N C y m N N y N N N N _ O N C O O d r N N N N N a ! m C v v E E w EE U) Or N ' 2 N N N N E2 f2 N N N j 'O 'O 0 O o a O O 'O 1ccccccc 'O 'O 'O c in n co U) io io U'Oc) c'nOc ` 2 E2 a) O N O LO w <I°o 0 <I°O m (1°O c`s°o� (a co c`0o m .d. C a n n m N O O 1 O N N N NNN N N M N N M N V v N N m m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c c c N a) m m N (DOOM a) m 0 0 0 N WOW O O O > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > N N N N m N m N a) N N a) a) a) a) N a) m m m m N N N N N N N N 0) N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 N a a a a a n n n a n n n n n n a a a `m d ro " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 U U U U U 0 U U U U 0 0 0 c c c c C C C C c c c c c c c c c c C C C C C c C C c c c C c O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m w O d d d g)d a) d d d d d m w a) m m 4 0 0 0 0 m m m m a) m m m 1N N N N N N N 0NN NNN N NNNN NNNNN N NNNNNNN 1 w' Rd' W W wC' w W a' of of of Of 2 w 2 x w w G' W w W w w w w w w w O O C C C C C C Ol N C C O! r C cap J NN N CO O O c C C p1 `1 N N N N E2 E2 O V V V C C C CO O N N a O � y N N C O y N O ° O O d m d a a N N U) Or o N C C w 0 O o a O O t` CO O O C C O 10 o f• O N 0 V ` 2 E2 a) O N O w O F'. C J 10 O N 10 > O .d. C a n n m N ,�. U O O O w 0 > J N O N N N N T T LO 0 r N O a C C C C a a O O C m Y m w m m y c o n c �, �a 00 N E D '00 ) m m d d C C Z J N o D N 'COO N d C y N n N N y N O O O O O O +. w w w Mn N j O U w cccc N N OOOO —2 y O O O0 1LL > m m m d m m m m oy °d 00 mmmm ° awww12 E' ma m m m m aOm d m c c m d a m w c m d m � m c N E E E E o aa >>>> >>>> > > m m m m o aci E U N U) (A W W W w w w w W w W 0 0 0 0 W> Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v v v v v a t v v vv v v v v v v O O O N M O O O O o O O o O O O O O O O O O O O co O N N N r N N n N N N N N N N N n N N N n N 04 N r N n N N N N N n N r N n N N N `m d ro " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 U U U U U 0 U U U U 0 0 0 c c c c C C C C c c c c c c c c c c C C C C C c C C c c c C c O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m w O d d d g)d a) d d d d d m w a) m m 4 0 0 0 0 m m m m a) m m m 1N N N N N N N 0NN NNN N NNNN NNNNN N NNNNNNN 1 w' Rd' W W wC' w W a' of of of Of 2 w 2 x w w G' W w W w w w w w w w c U a U Q LU O O N N N N 'o O O y OO O O O O 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O co O O O W O 6 N N N O O j 0 Lo > V (0 N N N O 0 N N O O� O O O � V D T C p C C C C C f0 f0 l0 N N N NN 0 0 > 0 .� y N > y N N N y N r N N N N N N N N a a n a m m o e a o 0 0 > > N 0 0 .,xN, N ..xN, N W N n c c m N N N y C L J J IL U U U U a s O N N N N 'o O O y OO O O O O 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O co O O O W O 6 N N N O O j 0 Lo > V (0 N N N O 0 N N O O� O O O � V D T C p C C C C C f0 f0 l0 N N N NN 0 0 > 0 .� y N > y N N N y N r N N N N N N N N a a n a o e a o 0 0 c N O fro O O O O o fo 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 'n o o y O o o o o o c U N O O U O O O O O O J J O O O NO U U N N O w n y O N N N N 'o O O y OO O O O O 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O co O O O W O 6 N N N O O j 0 Lo > V (0 N N N O 0 N N O O� O O O � V D T C p C C C C C f0 f0 l0 N N N NN 0 0 > 0 .� y N > y N N N y N r N N N N N N N N a a n a N c N C 4 c w c c c c c c U c c V O vO O O O O O O O O � O w n y O O O O a a ` E o U Lo a n E N d m a V v v W d) 00i N d)00) 'y N N N C C n O c `m E o o Og a fo a c o O = _ O m _ N>� N N •O NE O O N a O N c N nJ Ea N0ON LOEN NE f'vO c 1 n N A C C C N N N N d OI J l0 ° ° o ° E E E E E E ti A >>>> v 0 o o O o a a a a a o o O o v o o a n a Q Q Q ? C N N N N IL C C C C C u w m o ==== N O E E E E d d d m (oi (oi u u o w E_ E_ E_ E_ N N_ N_ y N_ N_ N_ N_ o O 3 •3 •3 3 rL U Q rG M M M N L) (n (/) (n O1 O O O O O O N 10 m N O (D CO (D O r a r r a v r v r v r w v a o v oo w v LO (n o LO LO LO u) In LO Lo O O O O O 0 O O O O N N N (V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N c c c c c c c c c c O O vO O O O O O O O O � O w n O O O O a a O O O O a a ` N N N d m a V v v W d) 00i N d)00) 0 701 c U a U Q W C c N N V 0 CD N N y c (D O C C c C y 0 0 y y y d _ _ N N d d % REGULAR AGENDA #7 1. Memorandum MY-Pf i CRYSTAL DATE: September 14, 2011 TO: Mayor and City Council Anne Norris, City Manager FROM: Charles Hansen, Finance Director G H SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Adopting Appendix IV of the Crystal City Code Relatinq to the 2012 Fee Schedule - Utility Section Water Charges The City adopted water conservation rates in 2011 as required by MN Statutes, Section 103G.291. This is a set of rates that charges a higher rate per unit of water used as the total water usage increases. This system is quite different from flat water rates where the rate per unit of water was the same no matter how much water was used. It is difficult to know exactly how the water conservation are performing compared to our previous flat rates since they have been in effect for such a short time. The water conservation rates may be delivering slightly less revenue than we had anticipated. This deviation is small enough so that it won't seriously impact the Water Fund if left in place for one year. I recommend that water rates remain unchanged for 2012. We will have eighteen months of billings with the conservation rates by the time we set water rates for 2013. Other Utility Charges We are recommending that storm drainage charges should increase for 2012 while sewer charges, street light charges and recycling charges remain at the 2011 levels. The Storm Drainage Fund is constructing a large number of capital projects that are depleting its cash balance. Changes discussed at the August 25th work session The first line in sewer charges is deleted since it measures usage in units of 100 cubic feet. All billings have been converted to units of 1,000 gallons. (page 3) Sewer rate increase has been eliminated. We had anticipated an increase in the charges that must be paid to the Metro Council Environmental Services for sewage treatment. Official notification of 2012 charges has now been received and there is no increase. (page 3) Based on the discussions at the work session, staff recommends the following charges: City staff will publish the new utility rates in the city newsletter. Conclusion Staff is requesting that the City Council consider adoption of the attached resolution. 2011 2012 Percent Change Dollar Change Water rate per 1,000 gallons, Tier #1 $3.94 $3.94 0.00% $0.00 Water rate per 1,000 gallons, Tier #2 $4.34 $4.34 0.00% $0.00 Water rate per 1,000 gallons, Tier #3 $4.75 $4.75 0.00% $0.00 Sanitary Sewer residential $46.20 $46.20 0.00% $0.00 Sanitary Sewer senior $37.42 $37.42 0.00% $0.00 Sanitary Sewer commercial (per 1,000 gallons) $2.04 $2.04 0.00% $0.00 Storm Drainage residential $9.90 $10.20 3.03% $0.30 Storm Drainage commercial ( per acre) $247.50 $255.00 3.03% $7.50 Street Lights residential or commercial $4.20 $4.20 0.00% $0.00 Street Lights multi -family residential $3.15 $3.15 0.00% $0.00 Recycling residential $10.65 $10.65 0.00% $0.00 City staff will publish the new utility rates in the city newsletter. Conclusion Staff is requesting that the City Council consider adoption of the attached resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING APPENDIX IV OF THE CRYSTAL CITY CODE RELATING TO THE 2012 FEE SCHEDULE - UTILITY SECTION WHEREAS, the City of Crystal conducts an annual review of fees charged for services and products; and WHEREAS, this review resulted in a recommendation that storm drainage rates should be increased from $9.90 per quarter to $10.20 per quarter for residential properties with comparable increases for non-residential properties: and WHEREAS, the attached fee schedule lists proposed charges for various services and products provided by the City of Crystal, which shall be billed during 2012. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Crystal City Council that the attached fee schedule is adopted and incorporated into the Crystal City Code as Appendix IV and is effective for all billings after December 31, 2011. Adopted by the Crystal City Council this 20th day of September, 2011. ReNae J. Bowman, Mayor ATTEST: Christina Serres, City Clerk (1) rn m Q) U a) IL C O v Cl) w� W ''v^ vI A� W LL O Q O L IL N r O N U M� O A r O O O o O N o O Cl O M O O O O O O O O O O O U O O O O M � V V O m J O @ J O O N U -O U U J (p LL U r c N c M c c V O U @ Y O O O_ m O O (D 2) o w O 3 o O O O O E U O O (D OO O @ U O U N ` 70 04 c J E 0 E O N V J � n o � O E E J w m m m N U N U @ 'O J j C t .X 3 ca L L L CO Q L U ° °jCo O O X - E N E O o C N o O c N O O a) C O O U U OO o O CO 0 0 V O 0 O N O O � @� a) � O o J 7 U N a m N O>, a) a) >• a a) O E O- O L N O- Na) O- (n as O- a a) O_ a) d N @ @ ~ a) N > Q. 0 o O y o O O O (h ) O O O I-- O O C,9 o O 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) 0 O 0 O O 0 C) 0 0 0 0 O 0 o 0 O 0 J O 0 0 6 6 6 0 U 6 0 O O O O O o O N o O Cl O M O O O O O O O O O O O U O O O O M � V V O m N V O @ J O O N U U U U J (p LL U r c N c M c c V O U @ O)-0 E O O O O O O O o c) N o O O O O O O O O O (D OO O O O U Op o O CO 04 V c) m O N V O O � � O r V 7 w m m m o a m U @ U m m ca L L L CO Q L U @ U U O O O O O o O N o O O O P1 O O O O O O O O O O O U U OO o O CO 0 0 V O 0 O @ O O � o a) � a) o J m m m m m m m m m U Co ro om C0 om (n as > > @ > O O (D O O o O y o O O O (h ) O O O I-- O O C,9 o O O U O O O O c) c Cl) f, O N O O � � J U coN T a) C N o N o _ w @ n a � o L � c o @ c LD L @ a) w C V N 7 UO a N O C a) @ O C J C N cL v O O N O C N y o U 7 D C T O -0 rn o> @ O O- o ° o m @ 'N o N N a) N C O) (a @ a) U E cu Q ¢ i = a° in o N O O O N O N O O O f_ N O N O O N O O m m V V m V m V NO N V m V m V V m w V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 O O O Lo u) O O Lo O o o �o O Lo O o o Ln O - u) o a) a) a) E a) a) o d a) d 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C C C C C C C E E E E E 'E E E E 'E a a Q Q.5 a a Q s'o Q Q a Q a Q a a Q Q co m m m ao m m m co ro 11 L O C E a Q m D O) J n cN @ U N U N C ° � w o U N D U w a) w a) U w Z O C C 'C C C 'C '@C r 7 J J J 7 7 _ O' Q Q U °- a a a O m O O O O O O 0 O O O V O O O O O 00 - V V O O N V C M a) N U U U U J (p LL E r c N c M c c V O U @ O)-0 E O O O O -O O -O a o a) a) m m a) p O m O �O O V O O O O O O O O U O O 0 V V m (O N V N O r V J O w m m m o a m U @ 2) m m ca L L L N O U @ N N N c c c O O O @ @ @ 0) 0) O) O O O O O O C O C d d d M M r M V V `m O a) E c L U N y E m a o 0 d O N U � O E O E O E E E C M a) N U U U U E oO LL E r c N c M c c V O a) U C a O)-0 E O O O O -O O -O a o a) a) m m a) a) U E a) H o) L rn L rn L m L rn rn L L a U) 0 a) a a a a) N CL n @ > N w m m m o a m 2) 2) m m ca L L L CO Q L U U U U a m m O O 0)0) V V O O 00 O O Cl O O wco(oc0000 V O O O O O V O O O O O V O O V) O O V O O 0 O O V O O 0 O O 0 V V O O O O 0 0 O O N N a) m a) L_ N L_ a) L_ N a) L_ 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 :E; 0 0 a) o o a) m a) o m m m m m m m m m m m m m Co ro om C0 om (n as > > D > > > :D > N N N c c c O O O @ @ @ 0) 0) O) O O O O O O C O C d d d M M r M V V `m a) E c N C T N M L @ C C C 7 _ 0 O O O -O a N N Ol m m J J O O I O O O O 0 0 0 3 3 CL n a o 0 Q) a) (U a) m P) 2) 2) m m ca L L L L U L U U U U a m m $� a) cu � 3 � � O O Lo LO LOO O O O (LO LO OO V V V V V O (0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N a) a) m N 0 0 0 0 0 a) a) a) m a) m m m m m m m m m m > > D D M 3�t a) 04c 0) m N N N C C C C) ° a) E C O mo (a (a c L O O O L O O 0, 0 0 0 o a m v (o rn (o rn 0) u (tea N M 0 i a O Q >O U C W m N � a O O O a v N m V m V a LL O O a) C, O O C, N CD 0 0 N V N 0 LL 0 0 O > O C N C, O O O a rn o OD m a LL O C O rn ° c M O (00 O (00 d LL O j O O C N N a) N N N C C C > > > C C O O C O ( (a (a fa L O O O O O O c 0 N M 0 i A) a) o Q F H f W m to (a m m (a CL a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) o 0 'O(O (o rn v U') m a0 (O m V V r N M V N tO v m tO m (q (n rn v rn a6 co co v v r N M V (O u) V m uO O m M on O e- N M V 10 tO v m tO m m M (n a 0) m m (O � N M a 10 C C G C C C J J J J J J N a) N N a) N LO LO tO LO LO LO LO LO to to LO LO V V V V V V OO O O O O tt) to t() tO tO t() O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N a) a) N a) >N N (a (0 (0 (0 i 7 i m m m m m m N C O N a) N m a) N a) m a) 0 N a) N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 c O a) N r a) co a) r N r Q) N 'C L m C N 'C N 'C N 'C a) 'C N a) 'C N 3 3 3 � 3 3 3 3 3 E E E w 00 (a (0 u 77 Q co 7 N 7 (0 7 co la 7 7 0 E N 7 N 7 (J a7 7 N 7 (T (6 7 m N 7 (a 7 L c L 0) a) NV � wO (n N (n (n m m (n m x0 a) a z N N a a z N a z N a z N a E O- N a) a a a) a U (D a a) a O" a) a a) a m a N a a) a m m E N c L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) O Cl) O Cl) O O O O O O O O O O O h V O O O h O O LO 't (D 0) (D O O O (D � 00 O O O O O )O M CD O O O O O O O o Cl) Cl) M o O O O O (V r O W) OD O ;! G M C r o C m r CA O O (G r r O O OO_ N N M O" O m OD r` r� O O O O O O O N O N O N N Lr)N a) O O N M O N r` N V r` O (O M r N O N Cl) (D Cl) (D co c0 (D m N (O aD V V M N V r (O V OD 00 o O W) W) N (O O r V V co O V N N (D N (D w 00 V LO (n V M c' N 00 (D 0) N ((1 m N Lo M Lo M Oi (D n O N N N CO m O N co c0 r*-: r O O O � O (f) O m" O O N M i0 (O V O mO_ N N O O M O h V r0 N O V) M (D OD m CD Cl) (O M (Q m m V OR N O aD V V M N (D OD M O r- V N m V M V V Cl) O V N N CO O N (D N LO V uD M V O m O (D m N N N co )O M )O M N (D (O m E (O (O m (O O � N (O )O O O O (O O u') O m O N O N O N M V O m Nn O_ O M o N V N N (D � (D M O a0 m m M O M O O m V W E LL� N V V N N V LO V w M O O t` V m V m V V M O V N M O (V co r- V V (O M V O m (D aD 0) N N OD r )O M (O CO N (0 V7 C C N o C 'C N m m— •U Q d N N U O N N co r N LO LO N CO m m O O (O (O OD N O N N Iq M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (O M V O m N O O r-: Cl) O N V N N (D Iq 0 M ED M m OD CO aD M (D m m V OR �- VO V) V V N N V LLD V c0 O O O r O V N OD V 0) V V Cl) O V N N M O N to r V V (O CO V O 0) O (D 0) N N N m (O M O M N (o O a) N N a) N m a) N a) m a) 0 N a) N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N 3 3 3 � 3 3 3 3 3 E E E w w w a) a) a) a) () a) N a) N LL O O L c L c L 0) a) NV � wO (n N (n (n m m (n m x0 .r J E m m m m m m m m C m m m m m E N c L E E O U 0 E E E w ° CL N 3 a En E E p .c 'E O o N N « c N c (0 �° _ o Em a c p o o O o a) Q N N O N a p E y N na p O p N N O v a C C N U C U N N c m N N 7 a) 7 d is �p a a 7 ap 'a 'D C N a O (0 Q' C D G (0 d L L L N O N a1 E U E > 100 o n N a (D 3 3 o E E v E c m E E > 8' c T N N aci a) a) N 'm o M aci n o (o ui v (o V a C C N o C 'C U) m m— •U Q d N U O N N co C L LO LO N CO (D o 'E m 'v a) `m @ m >, > E E 0 m i# ik m y aDi E (� c � E E a) 'E > w? E E cg o o a� a n a a E o m ca (o (a (° 3� a) o_ a) v m m 3 a) (D c c v L N N y p U E E w . _ N N o E a� o a a E E O c O c U N E U n m w N (0 fa a) E LL a) O N .� 7 N a) a_) a_) aN ouD rn co c co co co c za (D U pc ,°° o)2) E gaU aN 2) 2) 2) 2) ,0 rE7- n (n N a) E L U x x a ik y O) 0) 0) j j N L m a1 U `m U U `m U U U 'O 'O "O ——— .0 M M M a) O 7 .� C C U Y N d a) 0) a� a� a`) a`) a`) E E € a) a) a) �i x x o E u. p p 7 3 3 a) 3 a) 3 a) 3 a� 3 a) 3 3 y a� 3 m o 0 0 d y m eD ro v v v v (n U) E S)i B (i (n U (n N (n U (n U (n (n (n U (n (n (n R i0 i0 (O M M M M r r N r r r r r r (O (O (O 0 0 0 u') a0 N O (O � (O M N (O O O O O O0 O O O O O O O O O (n m )n O n O (O0 O O . 0 m m 0 0 O m )O (D . (D . (D (n (D (n a) . to (O (D n m r, (D t- (D r- n O l0 n w r- O r` r- O O n (0 1, 0O N n n n 0 O 0v v v v v v v v v v v v v v V• V• v v v v v v v v v v v v v v V 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 o ui LO LO O o O (n o�� 0 LO 0 0 0 0 0 m to LO to LO (O O 47 O M O 47 o (p O LLD O LL7 (O O O (O O (O O (O O (O O N M o N N O N h O Na (O O (O O O N O o M O o O M (O O O O (O O O M O O O i0 0 O O O O O o (O o O i0 O O O O O0 (O O O o a) N N a) N m a) N a) m a) a) N a) N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 E E E w w w a) a) a) a) () a) N a) N O O O L c L c L 0) a) m (n (n (n N (n (n m m (n m (n .r J J m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a) a) a) m a) a) a) a) m m a) a) a) N a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 io 0 aDD d o o o O) M n M m O T co O O O M r (6 V N N N O N cq N N ON) M O I- M w (D m M N Ll) M M 00 O (l) M N N OD (D r N (O M V V N N cM N (MD Lq O N cq N V M M N M Ll) o !n r M r r N o Ln (D M OD O M� r r N O a r N M N O n V' uN') O cl) N LO OD � V a M a0 N M U) O r co r N Lo (D (0 M OD O M r r r� N O V r N OMD N (MD (N o N W Lq V 7 M (D N CO LO O iO r M n r N 10 I (o M c0 O r Cl) n r r- N O r N cc a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O (O (D O) M O O O O O O O O O O 1 N N 0) O n O O O N n O O O O O M r O O O N M N W m M W O tD M V V N aD N 7 N O V M N O O M r O V N (0 Cl) (D N 0) Cl) It N Cl) N (D n V' N o E y o N N N r r r r M N a) E 0 c - 0)(0 a) 0) O � O N LO in 0) M O pl� a) V V' N (O N M N r d) 0) � M 00 O M r o r O (O M a7 N O V Cl! LL7 <t <t 1- at N N o a) N r N r r r r M N o E m o 5 3 Q) (D a) O 0) (D (O O N LO to M M D) tr O) [t V N (9 N M N � M v 0) 0 M 0 M r o o w Cl) (D N 0) V N iO I V n � N N r N r r r r (n N 4) V7 L O W aD LO O N iD (D d1 M O h O () V V N O N M N 0) V 0) n (O M O CO r O O 0 Cl) to N 0) V N (on x st N n V N c a L coqE N N r r r r Cl) N 3 c c c c ycop M c 0 o d a) m m a) a) a) o m a) o a) a) a) a) a) a) a) d d a) L_ L_ L L_ L_ L_ L L L_ L_ L_ L_ L L_ L_ L_ L_ L_ L_ L_ L L_ L_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 04') O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V N a c Qc o J N g 0 3 O n (D m V a) -o m n rn J E N o; r o E y o c N a) a) E 0 c - * E xo o n 8 a) w o c o aa)i c N o a) E a o o w a 3 v 12 o E m o 5 3 O a) 3a) $ N 0) O o. a) O m E d O a) a) o O o o V) c D E m o E E (Do y Q y a N a E a L L a E a? u.) () CL 3 a W 3 3 c 0 c 0 n ID d 3 au') L (on x o E 0 a a E c a L coqE '0 g m 0 E _0 d .N 04 3 c c c c ycop M c 3 (°) �) `x 3 If) r- Vaniyo vo Y o a 5 m m a f7!) U c > a N > ca V) C > O a a`) a`) a`) N V) C N , c N N pcp U x L3 x 3 a) > U oco C14 co 0 o N N J E (n N U E J v 7 7 7 Co y V y c (n a U) c (n c u) N E L -e a a °? O E O E O O E E N N J N N N o N U- 3 _8 V 3 _$ 3 - > U D U a) 2 () D_' a) w d a) of w r r r r (V CO CO V 0 � m 0 r 0 0 M m 0 0 m O <0 m O o (0 COm m 0 (0 m C. 0 (D n m CO o <0 m O o (D (D m m O (D m 0 (D m 0 (D m 0 ED 0 0 (D m 0 m O 0 O CD m O O r co to m 0 O 0 O LO O (D o (D O (O O (O O (D O (O O LO O (O KO O O 10 UO O O (O O LO O (O (O O O Ln (O O O (O O (n O (O (O o O (O (O O O (O O (D O (D O (D O 0 O LO O 0 O (O O (O O (O O (O O (O O p O (O 0 LO O (O O (O UO O O (O (O o O 0 o d a) m m a) a) a) o m a) o a) a) a) a) a) a) a) d d a) L_ L_ L L_ L_ L_ L L L_ L_ L_ L_ L L_ L_ L_ L_ L_ L_ L_ L L_ L_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 04') O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V N a REGULAR AGENDA #8 ..................... CITYoF Memorandum -. ' ;CRYSTAL DATE: September 14, 2011 T0: Mayor and City Council i FROM: Anne Norris, City Managertt,`� SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Salaries - 2012 BACKGROUND: During its work sessions to review the 2012 budget, the Council discussed decreasing the 2012 increase for Mayor and Council salaries to reflect the recent actual increases for city employees. While the Mayor and Council salaries have not increased for three years, these salaries are currently scheduled to increase by 3% in 2012. At its September 6 meeting, the Counciil approved the first reading of the attached ordinance reducing the increase for 2012 Mayor and Council salaries to 1 %. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the second reading of the ordinance reducing the Mayor and Council salaries in 2012. Attach: ORDINANCE NO. 2011 - AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO SALARIES OF ELECTED OFFICIALS, AMENDING SECTION 211 OF THE CRYSTAL CITY CODE THE CITY OF CRYSTAL ORDAINS: Section 1. Crystal City Code, Section 211.01 is hereby amended to read as follows: 211.01. Salary schedule. Subdivision 1. The annual salary of the mayor and other members of the city council are in the amounts and for the calendar years shown below: Calendar Year Mayor Salary Councilmember Salary 2008 9,983.07 7,679.86 2009 10,307.52 7,929.46 2010 10,307.52 7,929.46 2011 10,307.52 7,929.46 2012 1061675 41634 2012 10,410.59 8,008.75 Not with standing the foregoing, the council may enact an ordinance to take effect before the next succeeding municipal election that reduces the salaries of the mayor and the other council members. The ordinance shall be in effect for 12 months, unless another period of time is specified in the ordinance, after which the salary of all the members reverts to the salary in effect immediately before the ordinance was enacted. Subd. 2. The salaries of the mayor and other council members are payable monthly. Section. 2. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Crystal City code, subsection 110.11. First Reading: September 6, 2011 Adopted: Effective: ReNae J. Bowman, Mayor ATTEST: Christina Serres, City Clerk REGULAR AGENDA #9 .........._____... t: i c�Tv.oe`" Memorandum 'CRYSTAL DATE: September 14, 2011 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Anne Norris, City Manager�'�' SUBJECT: Consider Change to Election Filing Fees BACKGROUND: During its review of the City Charter last year, the Charter Commission recommended and the City Council approved the addition of a provision in the Charter to allow the City Council to determine a filing fee for mayor and councilmember elections. In a recent work session, the Council discussed increasing the fee from the current $5 to an amount higher to reflect the actual staff time involved in processing candidate applications. City Form of overnment Filing Fee Brooklyn Center Charter $25.00 Brooklyn Park Charter $25.00 Crystal Charter $5.00 Golden Valley Statutory — Plan B $5.00 Maple Grove Statutory $5.00 New Hope Statutory — Plan B $5.00 Plymouth Charter $5.00 Robbinsdale Charter $5.00 Attached is an ordinance raising the election filing fee to $25. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the first reading of the ordinance amending the filing fees for mayor and councilmember candidates. Attach: ORDINANCE NO. 2011 - AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO APPENDIX IV OF THE CRYSTAL CITY CODE REGARDING LICENSES AND PERMIT FEES - AMENDING FILING FEES THE CITY OF CRYSTAL ORDAINS: Section 1. Crystal City Charter, Section 4.10 provides for the City Council to determine a filing fee for election of mayor and councilmember. Section 2. Appendix IV, of the Crystal City Code, is amended to read as follows: 0100.4902 Filing for election — affidavit of candidacy application &W 25.00. Section 3. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Crystal City code, subsection 110.11. ReNae J. Bowman, Mayor ATTEST: Christina Serres, City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Summary Publication: Effective Date: 379023v4 MTN CR205-30 REGULAR AGENDA #10 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CKYST�AL Bassett Creek Regional Trail FROM: John Sutter, City Planner/Assistant Community Development Director�� DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW: Patrick Peters, Community Development Director DATE: September 13, 2011 TO: Anne Norris, City Manager (for September 20, 2011 meeting) SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution of Support for Three Rivers Park District's Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan The Bassett Creek Regional Trail is one of several proposed by Three Rivers Park District to provide facilities for first-tier suburbs that have been bypassed by the regional system. Such trails are intended to link people with regional parks and other local and regional destinations. For the past year Three Rivers has been working on a master plan for the entire seven mile route from French Regional Park in Plymouth through New Hope, Crystal and Golden Valley to Theodore Wirth Park. An open house to solicit public input was held in June and the draft plan is now complete and in its formal 30 -day public comment period. We have posted a link to the plan on the city website. The proposed route through Crystal is consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. It would follow 36th Avenue to Nevada Avenue, then south on Nevada to 32°d Avenue, then east on 32nd to the Highway 100 noise wall, then south to the bike/ped bridge over Highway 100 into Golden Valley. Completion of the entire trail route to Three Rivers regional trail standards will occur over an undetermined number of years. Three Rivers staff presented the highlights of the Master Plan at a Council work session on August 16th and requested that the Council adopt a resolution endorsing the Master Plan in September. The Council discussed the proposed trail alignment at a work session on September 6, 2011. Based on that discussion, staff prepared a resolution expressing support for the plan but with the following concerns: • Proximity of the trail to houses along the south side of 32nd avenue between Hampshire and Douglas Drive • Safe crossing of Douglas Drive at 32nd Avenue PAGE 1 OF 2 Future need to adjust the trail location at 32nd Avenue and the Highway 100 noisewall where it currently cuts across a future development site In addition to these three design -related concerns, a majority of the Council was encouraged that Three Rivers is considering system -wide winter maintenance of its system. This is not a design issue unique to the Bassett Creek Regional Trail so it is not discussed in the resolution. However, it will be mentioned in the City Manager's cover letter to Three Rivers. The following Exhibits are attached: A. Master Plan excerpts B. Public comment received by Three Rivers through August 24rh C. Proposed resolution of support Council action on the proposed resolution is requested. PAGE 2OF2 al ,S.��. i yy Y, lam.• ... (.� `( �, 1 _.. ! *.fZy �%'R�'� [ %i h"i .C6�./. A 4F r i rhl ,' ���i� ""•`. ✓ri . r � ••� r a ab). xp ., i, � �.i r 1 � _ � � � � y��t .Af���h'�3 �i� / laF '��ij� � [ r♦�'�Y y i �q � � �:1. ���, ! F Lie a ' Bassett Creek Regional Trail master plan DRAFT July 21, 2011 Executive Summary The Bassett Creek Regional Trail will fill a gap in the regional park and trail system with a safe, accessible and enjoyable option. Currently, many Twin Cities metropolitan area residents traveling to and through the first tier suburbs do not have access to safe, convenient and attractive off- road regional trail networks. The Bassett Creek Regional Trail will expand commuting, transit and recreational access to vital employment, retail and recreational sites in the metropolitan region - providing safety, economic development, mobility and environmental benefits. As a linking trail, the Bassett Creek Regional Trail may help reduce congestion and increase transportation efficiency. 0 OY 06 16 }R� - NORTR Bassett Creek Regional Trail Location & Contextual Relationship Source: Three Rivers Park District When completed, the regional trail will measure approximately seven miles from French Regional Park, through the Cities of Plymouth, New Hope, Crystal, and Golden Valley to the Minneapolis Grand Rounds at Theodore Wirth Regional Park. The Bassett Creek Regional Trail will provide direct and indirect access to residential neighborhoods, two elementary schools, a middle and high school, commercial nodes, and numerous connections to local and regional parks and trail systems. The regional trail corridor generally follows a route extending east and south from French Regional Park along 36th Avenue in Plymouth, over Trunk Highway 169 (TH 169) to Boone Avenue in New Hope. At Boone Avenue, Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan V r Li'rtana Plymouth i - w _ ..�,•-,� i Robbinstlale Ciflon:E RencM1 ! Rey9aal vBrx New Hope Crystal awl ..Ilr.il Raasetttmak , Rplonal Tail _ + ..'=+Il�;rnALaAw — _ . orNl Varaway ��0.[gbnal Troll Sp Golden Valley - N mega n ( i..o amYmel ywab Real N +r i 0 OY 06 16 }R� - NORTR Bassett Creek Regional Trail Location & Contextual Relationship Source: Three Rivers Park District When completed, the regional trail will measure approximately seven miles from French Regional Park, through the Cities of Plymouth, New Hope, Crystal, and Golden Valley to the Minneapolis Grand Rounds at Theodore Wirth Regional Park. The Bassett Creek Regional Trail will provide direct and indirect access to residential neighborhoods, two elementary schools, a middle and high school, commercial nodes, and numerous connections to local and regional parks and trail systems. The regional trail corridor generally follows a route extending east and south from French Regional Park along 36th Avenue in Plymouth, over Trunk Highway 169 (TH 169) to Boone Avenue in New Hope. At Boone Avenue, Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan V the regional trail diverts through Northwood Park before reconnecting with 36th Avenue to Nevada Avenue in Crystal. From Nevada Avenue, the regional trail corridor traverses south to 32nd Avenue and across Trunk Highway 100 (TH 100) into Golden Valley. From TH 100, the regional trail corridor traverses alongside Lilac Drive, Unity Avenue, Minnequa Drive, Westbend Road, Regent Avenue and Golden Valley Road/County Road 66 (CR 66) before connecting to its eastern destination at Theodore Wirth Regional Park. Three Rivers Park District (Park District) established a regional trail master planning process that included representatives from all affected municipalities, public agencies, and the general public to provide opportunities for input that contributed to the master plan outcome. A Bassett Creek Regional Trail Task Force was established that guided the trail master plan and coordinated planning efforts within the local communities and greater region. Members of the Task Force included representatives from the following affected stakeholders: Cities of Plymouth, New Hope, Crystal and Golden Valley, Hennepin County Transportation Department, and Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. The Park District presented general regional trail information and the preliminary Bassett Creek Regional Trail route to adjacent communities at City Council and Park Board meetings during the fall of 2010. While no formal action was taken by each community, informal approval of the regional trail route was indicated. The Park District, in conjunction with the adjacent trail communities, hosted a public open house where the general public reviewed the work of Task Force planning efforts and provided comment. Active use of the Bassett Creek Regional Trail is expected to provide walking/hiking, bicycling, running/jogging, bicycling, in-line skating, and dog walking opportunities during the non -winter months. The Park District's seasonal -use data of existing regional trails indicates that significant use of the trail will occur in the spring, summer and fall seasons. Winter use of the Bassett Creek Regional Trail is dependent on weather conditions and independent winter use agreements with local communities to maintain and operate the trail during the winter season (defined as November 15 to March 31). When fully constructed, the Bassett Creek Regional Trail is projected to generate 176,425 annual visits. Bassett Creek Regional Trail will connect single and multifamily residential neighborhoods, local schools, institutions, commercial areas and major recreation sites. These local and regional connections are intended to provide underserved Park District communities with a safe, multi -modal transportation option. VI Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 The Bassett Creek Regional Trail route is comprised of constructed and unconstructed segments, in varying states of Park District design standard compliance. Bassett Creek Regional Trail has been divided into seven major segments. A detailed route assessment is provided in the master plan document. Bassett Creek Regional Trail Segments Total 7.03 mfles 5.. Zachary Lane (adjacent to French Regional Park) TH 169 Pedestrian Bridge 36th Avenue 1.10 mile 1 New Hope TH 169 Pedestrian BridgeTH 169 Bridge I Nevada Avenue 36th Avenue I Boone Avenue 1 NorthwoodPark IWinnetkaAvenue 136th Avenue 1.63 milPedestrian I Crystal 36th Avenue 32nd Avenue Nevada Avenue 0.50 mile Nevada Avenue TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge 32nd Avenue I Vatley Place Park I Bassett Creek Park 1.57 mile Crystal I Golden Valley TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge 0.18 mile ..ax,.�.,.. i!!g Theodore Wirth ParkwayLilac (Theodore Wirth Regional Park) Drive I Briarwood Nature Area I Unity Avenue/Minnaqua Drive I Westbend Road I Regent Avenue I Golden Valley Road/CR 66 1.98 mile Total 7.03 mfles 5.. J y Plymouthryx+Eska O ®. ..ax,.�.,.. Robbinsdale C5Aohe ni M1�� } Rep'm IP k Ne'.V -IOPO O Crystal P �yl nr taae Fv96eal Trail ��P�n r Ines." Cleek qII Regional Trail `I _ 1 I mor a 1 r-11 is Pael ..muF - Y � 1 Golden Valley N r,.w 3(f' or.. T-1 RMmnafTral ✓� �pN'3 C a as as I xs x� N Source: Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan VII Operations & Maintenance Plan Bassett Creek Regional Trail is operated under Park District ordinances and policies. The regional trail is overseen by professional public safety operations and maintenance staff. Services and maintenance staffing levels increase as needed and as funding permits through the employment of seasonal staff. Park Service Officers and Park Police Officers provide public safety services. Volunteers also assist with trail patrol. Specific patrol of the Bassett Creek Regional Trail will be the primary responsibility of trail patrol staff assigned to French Regional Park, however all public safety staff patrol trails and on an as -needed basis or when call load presents an opportunity to conduct alternative patrol. Due to extensive property holdings, geographic distribution of facilities and the need to create an efficient and cost-effective work force, the Park District organizes and budgets maintenance services in six geographic clusters that provide maintenance service to Park District regional parks, park reserves and regional trails. The French Work Cluster provides maintenance services for the Bassett Creek Regional Trail. Estimated Costs & Funding Regional trail implementation has both initial costs (acquisition and development) and ongoing costs (operations and maintenance). Trail development will occur as opportunities to coordinate with other agencies/ projects occur, funding becomes available, and at the discretion of the Park District Board of Commissioners. Individual development projects may move forward to coincide with development adjacent to the trail corridor for purposes of cost savings. Regional trail development includes the cost to prepare the site, reconfigure roadways as required, modify drainage patterns where necessary, pave the trail, and install striping, and landscaping. In total, the estimated development cost for the Bassett Creek Regional Trail is $2,205,725. Additional items including wayfinding signage, traffic signage and devices, rest stops and miscellaneous trail costs are included in Appendix B Detailed Capital Improvement Cost Estimate. Annual operations and maintenance costs are estimated at $26,000 per year with one-time costs estimated at $3,000. VIII Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Section II I Trail Description & Background roadway Flanked by adjacent single family residential and Robbinsdale School District 281 property (Robbinsdale Armstrong High and Plymouth Middle Schools). Plymouth Middle School enrolls approximately 1,200 students, grades 6-8 and is located adjacent to 36th Avenue and TH 169. A grade separated pedestrian bridge was recently constructed in 2009 for safe crossing of TH 169. New Hope After crossing TH 169, the regional trail passes into the first tier suburb community of New Hope. The New Hope landscape adjacent to the proposed Bassett Creek Regional Trail route is predominantly single and multi -family residential with scattered commercial and institutional nodes at significant roadway intersections. An existing segment of the regional trail extends from TH 169 to Boone Avenue, passing commercial and residential properties and St. Joseph's Catholic Church. At Boone Avenue, a local connection is offered via an existing trail south to Sonneysen Elementary School which enrolls approximately 600 students, grades K-5. At the 36th and Boone New Hope's 36th Avenue is adjacent to Avenues intersection, the regional commercial, institutional and scattered trail route diverts north and east into single and multi -family residential land uses. Northwood Park offering regional trail users connection to a local community park and access to the North Branch of Bassett Creek. As the Bassett Creek Regional Trail corridor passes into New Hope, regional trail users have access to an existing regional trail segment from TH 169 to Boone Avenue. The proposed Bassett Creek Regional Trail reconnects with the east/west linear trail corridor at the 36th/Winnetka Avenues intersection. From this intersection eastward, the New Hope segment of the regional trail corridor offers connection to commercial, institutional and scattered single and multi -family residential land uses. Crystal The regional trail enters Crystal as the Bassett Creek Regional Trail travels south from 36th to 32nd Avenues along Nevada Avenue. Land use along Nevada Avenue is primarily large lot industrial, institutional and multi- family residential, setback from the roadway. Single family residential land uses become more prevalent as the regional trail extends east along 32nd Avenue. The regional trail offers local access to both Valley Place and Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 9 Section II I Trail Description & Background Crystal's 32nd Avenue travels through tree -lined residential neighborhoods. Recently constructed trail segment in Crystal connects trail users to the TH 100 trail segment and pedestrian bridge. The existing TH 100 pedestrian bridge between Crystal and Golden Valley overcomes a major physical barrier to multi -modal movement. Golden Valley Road/County Road 66 offers neighborhood connections to single family residential and several public and semi public land uses. Bassett Creek Parks before connecting to an existing trail segment prior to the TH 100 sound wall and pedestrian bridge. Golden Valley Bassett Creek Regional Trail passes between Crystal and Golden Valley via an existing pedestrian bridge that was built during the TH 100 reconstruction in 2003. The trail connects users to Briarwood Nature Area, a passive city recreation area offering access to Bassett Creek and walking trails. Subsequent land uses adjacent to the Bassett Creek Regional Trail through Golden Valley are primarily single family residential with a pocket of multi -family residential near Briarwood Nature Area. When the regional trail connects with Golden Valley Road/CR 66, the land uses remain residential, characterized by undulating topography. At this location, regional trail users have access to Golden Valley's Scheid Park, a local community park offering an internal trail system with neighborhood connections and active recreation opportunities. Traversing eastward, Bassett Creek Regional Trail connects to several public and semi public land uses, such as speciality medical clinic facilities and Unity Christ Church. Connection to the Minneapolis Grand Rounds is made at Bassett Creek Regional Trail's eastern terminus in Theodore Wirth Regional Park. Here the regional trail user has access to the largest park within the Minneapolis Park System offering year round active and passive recreational activities. Connection to the Luce Line Regional Trail and the larger regional park and trail system is also offered in Theodore Wirth Regional Park. 10 Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Section III I Public Process Evaluation & Findings For the purposes of the master plan, the Bassett Creek Regional Trail has been divided into seven planning segments. Each segment corresponds to the municipal jurisdiction or shared municipal jurisdiction in which the trail route traverses. The primary opportunities and challenges of the Bassett Creek Regional Trail route provide a better understanding of why the route was ultimately selected and the potential challenges the Park District and adjacent communities may face when segments are implemented. The regional trail route is described in greater detail in Section V I Development Concept. Segment A - Plymouth Opportunities • Provides connection to French Regional Park, Medicine Lake Regional Trail, residential neighborhoods, Armstrong High School Trail and Plymouth Middle School. • Utilizes an existing trail segment from Zachary to Pilgrim Lanes. • Accommodates adequate right-of-way to achieve preferred regional trail design guidelines. Challenges • Requires crossing 36th Avenue from the north to the south side of the roadway at Pilgrim Lane. • Requires utility relocates, several roadway intersection crossings and potentially a small retaining wall. • Provides connection to Northwood Park, residential neighborhoods, Sonneysen Elementary School and commercial businesses. • Utilizes an existing trail segment from TH 169 to Boone Avenue. Challenges • Requires ADA curb ramp upgrades at roadway intersection crossings between TH 169 and Boone Avenue. • Requires a northern diversion from 36th Avenue between Boone and Winnetka Avenues to connect to Northwood Park. • Requires potential compromise of regional trail design standards for locations where public right-of-way is limited. • Does not use existing trail segment on Boone Avenue between 36th and 32nd Avenues. Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 17 Section III I Public Process Segment D - New Hope I Crystal Opportunities Offers adequate public right-of-way to begin trail route's southerly transition along Nevada Avenue. Challenges Requires Nevada Avenue (partial) roadway reconstruction to provide an off-street trail. There are no immediate roadway reconstruction plans from either New Hope or Crystal. Segment E - Crystal Opportunities • Offers connection to residential neighborhoods, Valley Place and Bassett Creek Parks and commercial businesses. • Utilizes existing trail segments through Valley Place Park and from Xenia Avenue to the TH 100 pedestrian bridge. Challenges • Requires several roadway crossings, specifically the intersection of Douglas Drive/ County Road 102 (CR 102) - a minor arterial. • Requires utility relocates in select locations and potentially a small retaining wall. Segment F - Crystal I Golden Valley Opportunities I. Utilizes a grade separated pedestrian bridge across TH 100. Segment G - Golden Valley Opportunities • Offers connection to residential neighborhoods, Sheild Park, commercial/institutional businesses and Theodore Wirth Regional Park (Minneapolis Grand Rounds). • Utilizes existing trail segments from TH 100 pedestrian bridge to Regent Avenue. Challenges • Requires Golden Valley Road/ CR 66 roadway reconstruction to provide an off-street trail. There are no immediate roadway reconstruction plans from Hennepin County. • Requires creative solution through residential areas where limited right-of-way and recent road and/or sidewalk work has been completed. 18 Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Section V I Development Concept Development Concept The Bassett Creek Regional Trail provides the communities of Plymouth, New Hope, Crystal and Golden Valley direct access to the regional park and trail system with connections to the greater metropolitan area. The regional trail corridor travels through established urban areas where few opportunities exist to otherwise significantly expand their trail systems in the future. The regional trail corridor generally follows a route extending east and south from French to Theodore Wirth Regional Parks. As the regional trail traverses each community, residential neighborhoods, commercial nodes and local amenities are connected to complete a gap in the regional park and trail system. Development Plan Permitted Regional Trail Uses The regional trail will be open to the general public, and its intended uses include walking, jogging, in-line skating, bicycling and other uses allowed understate law including, but not limited to, other personal driven mobility devices (OPDMDs) and electric personal assisted devices. In addition, motor vehicles used by the City or Park District for maintenance, law enforcement or other public uses will be permitted on the trail in emergency situations, when pertinent to the specific maintenance or patrol activity, when the motor vehicle cannot legally operate on the street, and/or when an adjacent roadway does not exist. Routine maintenance and patrol with motor vehicles will be conducted from the adjacent roadways. Regional Trail Design Guidelines The optimum trail design for its anticipated use is a ten -foot -wide paved surface separated from vehicular traffic. There may be instances that require the trail to be temporarily on -road or reduced in width for short segments or until long range plans for appropriate right-of-way are resolved or funding is available to address sections that do not meet typical regional trail design guidelines. Bituminous trail surface is preferred because it is cost effective and is less prone to erosion than aggregate surfaces. A number of factors will be taken into consideration as final designs for unconstructed regional trail segments are implemented, such as: • Right-of-way width • Topography and drainage impacts Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 35 Section V I Development Concept • Existing vegetation • Curb cuts and driveway crossings • Overhead and subsurface utilities • Intersection crossings • Proximity to adjacent buildings, homes, businesses and industrial facilities In limited circumstances, trails may parallel the roadway at back of curb separated from the road by a minimum paved two -foot -wide clear zone.' This clear zone provides a buffer between the trail users and motorists and should be striped to delineate the edge of the trail. Curb ramps should be used at all roadways. Regional trails should have a maximum of five percent (5%) grade and a cross slope of two percent (2%) for drainage (Figure 13). NOTES: i SHOULD AT MAX 3%SLOPE ON sHouLDER. 0 3:1 M IMUM SLOPE (H:V) ,} ,K ! ,�•t 4gJ�pJ}} OUTSIDE OF 2' SHOULDER. PREFERRED 3' CLEARANCE (Z F AT_C OBSTRUCTION. FROM ES OR OTHER. Iq S� q Q SEE PLN SHEETS FOR TRAIL STRIPING. a BOULEVARD VARIES IN W OTH. BUT SHALL SEAMIN. OF 2. SIGN INSTALLATION NOT APPLICASLE IN ALLAREAS. MAX CROSS SLOPE 2%. SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR Mahwa 10'VcfiW SLOPE DIRECTION. ar&.Ati .Trail. E OF Trim Tn•Branche, MIN. BETWEEN OFSGN. A.MinBly. I Us= J Roedxa CTa oll,Typ.= Figure 13 Preferred Regional Trail Cross Section, Source: Three Rivers Park District Unconstructed regional trail segments will be designed in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local codes. In addition, the following sources will be referred and adhered to when preparing the design and construction plans as appropriate: • Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, prepared by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 1999 • Selecting Roadway Design Treatments to Accommodate Bicycles, Federal Highway Administration, January 1994 36 Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Section V I Development Concept • Mn/DOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), March 2007 • State Aid Rule 8820.9995 Minimum Bicycle Path Standards, State Aid for Local Transportation • Trail Planning, Design, and Development Guidelines, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD), Mn/DOT, May 2005 • Public Right of Way Access Guidelines (PROWAG) Primary Trail Design Elements Trail Crossings The urban setting for the Bassett Creek Regional Trail requires that it coexist with the higher volume roadways that serve transportation needs. There are numerous locations where the regional trail crosses established roadways. The relationship between roadway and regional trail users is important. Generally, where the trail crosses a roadway, the crossing is proposed to be marked with safety signage and surface paint to alert motorists and trail users. As vehicular traffic fluctuates, there may be a need for additional traffic signals or modifications to existing signalized intersections. Signage is proposed to be placed to alert regional trail users and drivers of the upcoming crossing. General warning signs may be placed in areas with greater congestion. In all cases, existing roadway configuration, roadway infrastructure elements, vegetation and other potential visual obstructions will be evaluated so sight lines can be maintained. Special provisions, such as mirrors, may be added to improve trail visibility from driveways if deemed appropriate. Supporting Trail Elements Trail wayfinding signage, traffic signage and devices, rest stops, and drainage are important elements of regional trails. Their proper design and placement add both aesthetic and functional value to the trail. Wayfinding Signage Regional trail wayfinding signage provides trail users with orientation and location information for amenities and services. Wayfinding signage typically provides: • An overview map of the regional trail network in Hennepin County, and of the specific regional trail. • Directions and distances to major destinations and points of interest along the regional trail. Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 37 Section V I Development Concept • Directions for long- term detours or interim routes when there are gaps within the regional trail. • Location information for nearby amenities such as local parks and local trails. • Location information for nearby services, such as drinking water, public restrooms, and public parking. • Visual identification of the regional trail network through physical kiosk/ signage structures. Regional trail wayfinding signage provides trail users with visual identification of the regional t 'I t The Park District employs rap ne wor t roug t e p ysical kiosk/signage three types of wayfinding structures. signage structures; system kiosks, regional trail kiosks and directional signage. Descriptions of each are as follows: • System Kiosks A free-standing, roofed structure that provides trail users with a map of Three Rivers' Regional Park and Trail System, the regional trail rules and general information about the Park District. • Regional Trail Kiosks A free-standing, roofed structure that provides trail users with a map of the entire regional trail, a description of trail highlights, and a two-mile by two-mile aerial map which depicts local trails, amenities and services near the regional trail. • Directional Sign A post structure with description blades attached, depicting the direction, the name and the distance to major destinations and points of interest on the trail. Each post structure has the capability of holding up to 12 description blades. 38 Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Section V I Development Concept Placement of wayfinding signage structures along regional trails typically follow three levels of primary configuration (Table 11). Exact location and content of wayfinding signage is determined in conjunction with local community input and is often dictated by available public right-of-way The unique urban nature of the Bassett Creek Regional Trail requires wayfinding signage at strategic delineated points (Table 12). Table it Wayfinding Signage Configurations OT 7.1.VA i!r aY1 One- 10 1 * Qne._ vt Gr y S �rt Location Components Estimated Cost 3++, -i ' e, aae; yF-law l..Icq nnestinnal ngna9e ga.nSn hull anuars) Y Y m°n In.. none wltno reglnnalt l'aeI. naco `qre vans I V, trail systems on. trail rasa meanan.neaon¢nr°aa mmed m...Cnon wan moat cammwllrr me r. Source: Three Rivers Park District Table 12 Wayfinding Signage Locations Level A Level B 1I C Location Components Estimated Cost wolneng/end otreglonal Mall •Systtm kiosk g aj,.c, tan at ausr5) tea ellana • Aegl anal trailkiosk r alv ge and awaiP ,au m .5. . hire tmnal sig �e Ces on « aa, French Regional Park's trolley N/A 281) tennis courts* Location Components Estimated Cost FLV Lair avert' two mugs • Reglonel Mall xlosk gls,am OmI anuars) rt, "ia n-11 ✓e c[mnal signage ln<I`Oas e/I signege an° 91og [e er nlisnenp In"n " fep n trail: e one at est Park entrance, Avenue One- 10 1 * Qne._ vt Gr y S �rt Location Components Estimated Cost 3++, -i ' e, aae; yF-law l..Icq nnestinnal ngna9e ga.nSn hull anuars) Y Y m°n In.. none wltno reglnnalt l'aeI. naco `qre vans I V, trail systems on. trail rasa meanan.neaon¢nr°aa mmed m...Cnon wan moat cammwllrr me r. Source: Three Rivers Park District Table 12 Wayfinding Signage Locations Level A Level B 1I C Other One (1) along 36th Avenue (south one (Q regional trail klosk one (1) at southwest quadrant skis) near Plymouth Middle School of 36[M1 and Moved Avenues added to existing signage at (Rohbinsdele Independent school .1i intersection French Regional Park's trolley N/A 281) tennis courts* stop One (1) in Northwood Park near western One(1) near loo pedestrian One (1) sign in conjunction entrance bridge terminus (Golden Valley) Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board at entrance, One (1) In Bosse[[ Creek Park near Vale one at est Park entrance, Avenue old alley Road/CK 66ot Golden Valley 66 adjacent nt to G adjacent to Golden Valley ua Intersection, Regent [ersec[lon, and Regent Avian Roan/C0. 66 adjacent to s6leid Park eld Pa •Requires coordination with Robbinsdale Independent School District 281 and City o(Rlymouth Traffic Signage and Devices In addition to wayfinding signage, plans for providing traffic control signs and devices, such as trail stop signs and center line pavement markings will be prepared. Signs and devices should reflect the physical characteristics and usability of individual trail segments and the system as a whole. Thus, as trail segments are developed (or reconstructed), trail signs and devices may require modification. The cost to add traffic control signs and devices to a regional trail in a first ring suburb is approximately $3,000 per trail mile (2010 dollars). Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 39 Section V I Development Concept Rest Stops Rest stops on regional trails are useful elements as they provide places for trail users to enter and exit the trail and an area for amenities such as trash receptacles, benches and bicycle racks. These simple but important amenities can serve to reinforce understanding Example of regional trail rest stop elements which of the regional trail route. incorporate trail user amenities. Locations for rest stops will be evaluated and incorporated into Bassett Creek Regional Trail as appropriate during design and implementation. The cost to add rest stops to a regional trail every mile where adequate space exists is approximately $6,700 each (2011 dollars). Drainage In many locations, the drainage of the regional trail is similar to that of a typical sidewalk. As such, stormwater sheet flows over the trail pavement and onto the adjacent roadway, where it is collected and conveyed by the roadway stormwater drainage system. In areas where the regional trail is on an independent route, such as through parks or other green spaces, the trail must be designed to function during periods of wet weather. Stormwater must shed rapidly from the surface of the trail, and concentrated flows must be conveyed beneath the trail surface, so as not to create a hazardous situation for the users. Route Assessment The Bassett Creek Regional Trail has been divided into seven major segments (Figure 14 and Table 13) which are comprised of constructed and unconstructed segments, in varying states of Park District design standard compliance. Preliminary field review has revealed that some constructed regional trail segments do not meet the Park District's design standards. In light of their relatively recent construction, the Park District intends to utilize the existing trail segments as -is for the life of the pavement, or until local road reconstruction projects or adjacent development/redevelopment allow upgrade to any non -conforming regional trail segments. See Appendix A I Regional Trail Route Maps for larger, more detailed maps. Trail easements are recommended for each bituminous trail segment currently constructed, regardless of their compliance with Park District design standards. Easements are not recommended for existing non-compliant concrete sidewalk segments until said segments are reconstructed to meet preferred regional trail design standards. 40 Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Section V I Development Concept 0 0» on I a 0 N PTX Figure 14 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Segments Source: Three Rivers Park District Table 13 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Segments Plymouth Zachary Lane (adjacent to Freneh Regional Park) TH 169 Pedestrian Bridge 36th Avenue 1.10 mile lax, Y Plymouth TH 169 Pedestrian Bridge 0.06 mile k New Hope TH 169 Pedestrian Bridge �� n 1.63 mile r Robbinsdale Cfaon.B P ch7O RWIo IP dtuna New Nope O Crystal / taws `\`\\ Bennett creak/ ^© TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge 32nd Avenue I Valley Place Park I Bassett Creek Park RaPlonal hall r ��1 Crystal I Golden Valley TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge 0.18 mile O Golden Valley TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge aMar ulae Drive I Brierwood Nature Area I unity Avenue/Minnaqua Drive I Westbend Road I Regent Avenue I Golden Valley Road/CR 66 1.98 mile < I y Golden Valley -� N two Line a 0.epbnal i,all wIm« C 0 0» on I a 0 N PTX Figure 14 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Segments Source: Three Rivers Park District Table 13 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Segments Plymouth Zachary Lane (adjacent to Freneh Regional Park) TH 169 Pedestrian Bridge 36th Avenue 1.10 mile Plymouth I New Hope TH 169 Pedestrian Bridge 0.06 mile New Hope TH 169 Pedestrian Bridge Nevada Avenue 36th AvenueI Boone Avenue I Northwood Park I wi nnetka Avenue 136th Avenue 1.63 mile New Hope I Crystal 36th Avenue 32nd Avenue Nevada Avenue 0.50 he Crystal Nevada Avenue TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge 32nd Avenue I Valley Place Park I Bassett Creek Park 1.57 mile Crystal I Golden Valley TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge 0.18 mile Golden Valley TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge Theodore Wirth Parkway (Theodore Wtrth Regional Park) ulae Drive I Brierwood Nature Area I unity Avenue/Minnaqua Drive I Westbend Road I Regent Avenue I Golden Valley Road/CR 66 1.98 mile Source: Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Total 7.03 miles Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 41 C5 I As the regional trail route rejoins 36th Avenue at Winnetka Avenue, an existing five-foot wide sidewalk traverses the remaining stretch of 36th Avenue on the south side of the road to Nevada Avenue (Figure 24). Segment C5 requires removal of the existing sidewalk and construction of a new bituminous trail within right- of-way. The preferred regional trail design may require compromise in certain locations along this segment, specifically at the grade separated railroad crossing. Section V I Development Concept Figure 24 Existing sidewalk along 36th Avenue to be replaced with new bituminous trail on the south side of the road. Segment D - New Hope I Crystal The regional trail begins a southerly descent as it travels south on Nevada Avenue for approximately 0.50 miles between 36th and 32nd Avenues where currently there are no off-street pedestrian or bicycling accommodations (Figures 25 and 26). The existing public right-of-way measures 66 feet with on -street parking allowed. According to the Cities of New Hope and Crystal, there are no imminent plans for Nevada Avenue roadway reconstruction. The master plan recommends striping an on -street bike lane along Nevada Avenue's west side as a short term solution. As opportunities arise, the master plan recommends seeking funding to construct this segment off- street. Source: Three Rivers Park District Figures 25 & 26 Segment D - New Hope I Crystal Along Nevada Avenue, the trail is proposed on the west side (right side of photograph). Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 45 Section V I Development Concept Segment E - Crystal Segment E, located within the City of Crystal, is subdivided into six segments measuring approximately 1.57 miles along 32nd Avenue between Nevada Avenue and the TH 100 pedestrian bridge, For the length of 32nd Avenue, the regional trail is proposed on the north side between Nevada and Hampshire Avenues, and then the south side from Hampshire Avenue until Vera Cruz Avenue (Figure 27). Segment From To Along I Through Length E Nevada Avenue TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge 32nd Avenue I Valley Place Park I Bassett Creek Park Figure 27 Segment E - Crystal Source: Three Rivers Park District E1 I No off-street pedestrian accommodations are currently available on the north side of 32nd Avenue between Nevada and Louisiana Avenues where the regional trail is proposed (Figure 28). The master plan recommends construction of a ten -foot -wide, off- street bituminous trail with further recommendation to convert parking lanes which creates a boulevard, in cooperation with the City of Crystal. Figure 28 No off-street pedestrian accommodations are currently available between Nevada and Louisiana Avenues where the regional trail is proposed, 46 Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Section V I Development Concept E2 I Between Louisiana and Kentucky Avenues, there is an existing eight - foot sidewalk. Segment E2 requires removal of the existing sidewalk and construction of a new bituminous trail within right-of-way. E3 I From Kentucky to Hampshire Avenues, the regional trail follows an existing eight -foot bituminous trail through Valley Place Park as a short term solution. As opportunities arise, the master plan recommends seeking funding to construct this segment off-street, adjacent to 32nd Avenue as it provides a more direct route while still offering access to Valley Place Park. E4 I At the intersection of Hampshire and 32nd Avenues, an five-foot sidewalk exists on the south side of the roadway which extends to Douglas Drive/CR 102. Segment E4 requires removal of the existing sidewalk and construction of a new bituminous trail within right-of-way. E5 I From Douglas Drive/CR 102 to Xenia Avenue, an existing eight -foot bituminous trail connects regional trail users to residential areas and Bassett Creek Park (Figure 29). A newly constructed trail segment which meets preferred regional park district standards exists from Xenia to Vera Cruz Avenues. Widening the bituminous trail to preferred regional trail design standards from Douglas Drive/CR102 to Xenia Avenue is recommended as opportunities arise. E6 I At Vera Cruz Avenue, the regional trail travels south along an Figure 30 existing segment of trail to meet the Existing bituminous trail along the TH TH 100 pedestrian bridge (Figure 100 right-of-way. 30). This segment meets the Park District's preferred regional trail design standards. The trail alignment may shift slightly if a proposed City of Crystal residential subdivision of existing TH 100 Mn/DOT right -of way comes to fruition. Should the trail require reconstruction due to said subdivision, the cost for trail relocation shall be borne from the City of Crystal or passed on to the developer. Figure 29 Existing bituminous trail along the south side of 32nd Avenue within Crystal. Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 47 Section V I Development Concept Segment F - Crystal I Golden Valley A pedestrian bridge, constructed in conjunction with the 2003 TH 100 reconstruction, allows connection between Crystal and Golden Valley (Figures 31 and 32). This previously defined physical barrier was overcome with a 14 -foot -wide bridge that accommodates multi -modal, two directional pedestrian and bicycling traffic. As this bridge meets Park District standards, no modifications are recommended at this time. Figure 311 TH 104 pedestrian bridge between Crystal and Golden Valley, constructed in 2003. Figure 32 Segment F - Crystal I Golden Valley Source; Three Rivers Park District. Segment G - Golden Valley Segment G includes 1.98 miles of regional trail within Golden Valley and is subdivided into four segments (Figure 33). Gi I As the regional trail enters Golden Valley from the TH 100 pedestrian bridge, it utilizes an existing eight -foot -wide bituminous trail along the east side of Lilac Drive and Unity Avenue. During this stretch, the regional trail connects users to Briarwood Nature Area and multi -family residential (Figure 34). Widening the bituminous trail to preferred regional trail design standards is recommended as opportunities arise. 48 Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 a PD x I-II Z W a a M x H G� Z W CL a m f�1 ux Z W M a a a a W - - �q as t }s m ma ° u r — _ aw � C � C a a— �ti Ma D 9 O i ' F � C y G x a a a v E a a IL 9 C Z d a X Z W a a V - APPENDIX B Appendix B I Detailed Capital Improvement Cost Estimate Subtotal for Segment B 335 0.06 $0 Segment C - New Hous TH 169 Pedestrian Segment Park District historical costs utilized for bituminous trail construction as follows: Length (feet) New construction $60 - $110 per lineal foot Reconstruction $30 - $80 per lineal foot Traffic signage and devices $3,000 per regional trail mile Rest stops $6,700 per regional trail mile Subtotal for Segment B 335 0.06 $0 Segment C - New Hous TH 169 Pedestrian Segment Bridge to Nevada From Avenue TO Length (feet) lum,th (miles) Existing Trail Type of Construction Assumed Cost per LF Segment Cost Existing 8' bituminous Vail along 36th Avenue At Zachary Lane Pilgrim Lane 3,805 072 Reddeb d width, requires Reconstruct $50 $190,250 (noM side) requires widening and 80 $0 (soum ads) appears to meet Park District Badge reconstruction as regional Vail design reconstruction. Utility relocates and small standards. Minor upgrades are required (ADA opporuntias ads.. guidelines. retaining wall may be required. mm ramps) as opportunities anse. Proposed Troll Proposed Trail TH TH 169 Pedestrian Existing sidewalk, Existing all Existing 5' concrete sidewalk along Will A2 Plignm Lane Bridgereconstruction 2,025 038 requires removal and New Consmiden $]0 $141.]50 Avenue side) to be reconstructed to 10' $70 $44,800 Avenue (east side) to be recent uded to 10' with reconstruction with bituminous trail. bituminous trail. bituminous hail. bituminous Imil. Subtotal for Segment A 5,830 1.10 $332,000 Segment B - Plymouth I New Hope Subtotal for Segment B 335 0.06 $0 Segment C - New Hous TH 169 Pedestrian Segment Bridge to Nevada From Avenue TO Length (feet) lum,th (miles) Assessment Existing Trail Meets Type of Construction Assumed Cost per LF Segment Cost Basis of Cost Assumption Existing 10 bituminous Vail along 361h Avenue C1 TH 169 Federman Boone Avenue 2440 0.46 Park DisNd preferred None 80 $0 (soum ads) appears to meet Park District Badge regional Vail design standards. Minor upgrades are required (ADA guidelines. mm ramps) as opportunities anse. Proposed Trail Northwood Park Existing all Existing 5' concrete sidewalk along Boone C2 36th Avenue Entrance 640 0.12 requires removal and New Construction $70 $44,800 Avenue (east side) to be recent uded to 10' reconstruction with bituminous trail. bituminous Imil. Existing Trail Meets ori Park badge in Parknal Cannot Exisgng 10' bituminous trail appears to meat C3 E."n Enlranw NonhwoPedelman Northwood Park 1.840 0.35 designpreferr regional Vail design Striping $5 $9200 Park Doonot standards. Requires centerline guitlelines striping. Proposed Trail P.d.ali in bridge in Existing aggregate Construct new 10' bituminous trail on gravel C4 NoMwoctl Park Will Avenue 1,740 033 pathway to be New Construction $60 $104,400 base. Assumes no wetland impal. reconstructed with bituminous toil. Proposed Trail Existing sidewalk Existing 5' concrete sidewalk along 36th C6 Wmelka Avenue Nevada Avenue 1,950 0.37 requires removal and New Construction $70 $136,500 Avenue(south side) to be reconstructed to 10' reconstruction with bituminous lost. bituminous trail. Subtotal for Segment C 8,610 163 Segment D - New Hope I Crystal $240,900 Poplu etl Trail No ConsWct l6' oR-street, biNminous trail along existing Off street Nevada Avenue (west side). Assumes partial D 36th Avenue 32nd Avenue 2,650 050 pecestnan New Constructor $150 $39],500 removal of existing roadway within right-of-way accomodations. Does not include costs for crown adjus erents. 'Note: On d est bike lane with sinpieg/signage along Nevada Avenue (weal side) as short term solution = $26,500 (2,650 R g $IXF). Subtotal for Segment D 2,650 0.50 $397,$00 Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 77 Appendix B I Detailed Capital Improvement Cost Estimate Segment E - Crystal $.,..t From To Length Ifinit) Length (innill Assessment Try pe of Construction Assumed Cost per LF Segment Cost Basis of Cost Assumption Construct 10' off-street, bituminous trail along (too) (miles) Proposed Trail No Construction per Up Cost 32nd Avenue (north aide). Utility relocates and Ed Nevada Avenue Louisiana Avenue 640 0.12 ousting o0 -street New Constructed $75 $48,000 small retaining walls may be required. G1 Bodge Minnaqua Drive 1,]]0 034 pedestrian Reconstruct $70 $123,900 Personal to convert parking lanes to trail and a ic.and .tions. boulevard, with coordination from the City of 0pporunbes arse. Crysbalattal ofdesi n. Proposed Trail Existing 8' bituminous Vail along Toledo Existing sidewalk Existing 8' sidewalk along 32nd Avenue (north E2 Louisiana Avenue Kentucky Avenue 365 007 require. removal and New ConsWction $70 $25.550 side) to be reconstructed to 10bituminous reconstruction with regional trat. bituminous trail. Sass.0 Creek is problematic at soma Proposed Trail No Construct ue off-street,) Vail along E3 Kentucky Avenue Hampshire Avenue 975 0.18 exist ng off-street New ConaWction $75 $]3,125 Utilnous Avenue (nark side). Utility relocates may p.ac onedc be re be required. G3 Weslbentl Road Golden Valley 930 0.16 ions New ConW ion sd $70 $fi5,100 Avenue est side) to be reconstructedm 10 (w ' Rai 66 Proposed Proposed Trail bituminous trail. E4 Hampshire Avenue Douglas Dnve/CR 1,300 025 Existing sidewalk requires removal and New ConsBuction $70 $91,000 Existing 5' sidewalk along 32nd Avenue (scum 102 reconstruction win side) to he reconstructed to 10' bituminous thal. bituminous trail. Existing 6' comate sidewalk along Golden Theodore Who sidewalk Existing 8' bituminous bail along 32nd Avenue G4 Regent Avenue Parkway 6.070 6,0]0 115 Existing Trail New Construction $80 $485600 , (south side) from Douglas Oni 102 to Restricted width. Xenia Ave (2,050 ft) to be reconstructed to 10' E6 Douglas DolVera Cmz Avenue 2,650 0.50 requires Recombuct $54 $143,100 bituminous Vail Trail segment along 32rM 102 reconstruction reconstruction as Avenue (south side) from Xenia Ave. to apse. offeDistrict Vera Cruz Ave. (600 fit constructed to Park standards by City of Crystal in 2010. Trail construction appears to meet Park Oistnct Existing Trail Meets standards, but requires stuping. Trail E6 Vera Cl Avenue TH 100 Pedestrian 2,3]0 045 Park District preferred Striping $5 $11850 alignment may shift slightly if City of Bodge regional trail design Crystal's residential subdivision(creation guidelines of seven new lots) occurs within current Mn/DOT ri ht-of-wa .• •Note: I/E6 requires moonstructioo, 10' bituminous Vail estimated cost - $177750 (2,3]0 R @ $75/B) Subtotal for Segment E 8,300 157 F - Crystal I Golden Valley F (West side of TH 100 Subtotal for Segment F Segment G - Golden Valley 1001 975 0.18 Park Dahl preferred None regionallreil design 9]5 0.18 $392,626 $0 gp Grade separated bridge construction appears Ito meet Park Oistnct stantlartls. $0 Segment From TO Length Length Aiusearment Tape Assumed cost Segment Basis Cast Assumption (too) (miles) Existing Trail Construction per Up Cost ad TH 100 Pedestrian Restricted width, Existing 8' bituminous Vail along Unity Avenue G1 Bodge Minnaqua Drive 1,]]0 034 requires Reconstruct $70 $123,900 (east side) and open space requires widening reconstruction as and racphai ion. 0pporunbes arse. Existing Trail Existing 8' bituminous Vail along Toledo Re n cted width, Avenue (east side), open apace and Sco0 G2 Minnaqua Drive Regent Avenue 1.620 031 requires Reconstruct $70 $114,100 Avenue (east side) requires widening and reconsWction as reconstmonon. Tight curves and proximity to oppemnnes arse. Sass.0 Creek is problematic at soma locations. Proposed Trail Existing sidewalk Existing 5' concrete sidewalk along Regent G3 Weslbentl Road Golden Valley 930 0.16 requires removal and New ConW ion sd $70 $fi5,100 Avenue est side) to be reconstructedm 10 (w ' Rai 66 reconstruction with bituminous trail. bituminous trail as oppomunims ansa. Proposed Trail Existing 6' comate sidewalk along Golden Theodore Who sidewalk Valley Road/DR66 (south side) to be G4 Regent Avenue Parkway 6.070 6,0]0 115 requires removal and New Construction $80 $485600 , reconstructed with l0' bituminous Vail. rerunstructmin with Signifcent utility relocates, limited space for bituminous treil. boulevard and full width h Tonal tell. Subtotal for Segment G 10,409 1.98 $]08,700 78 Three Rivers Park District Draft July 21, 2011 Appendix B I Detailed Capital Improvement Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Notes Regional Trail Construction Summary Unit Cost New construction 3.65 miles $1,613,325 Reconstruction 1.87 miles $571,350 Striping and/or signage 0.80 miles $21,050 Meets Park District standards 0.71 miles $0 Subtotal Z03 miles $2,205,725 Estimated Easements/Right-of-Way Costs B 1 0 1 Square Feet I N/A 1 $7.50 1 $0 ci 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $26,400 $0 C2 2,560 Square Feet Residential $7.50 E3 $19,200 C3 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 0 $0 C4 2,112 Square Feet Commercial $7.50 Square Feet $15,840 c5 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $0 D 1 0 1 Square Feet I N/A 1 $7.50 $0 E1 3,520 Square Feet Residential $7.50 $26,400 E2 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $0 E3 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $0 E4 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $0 E5 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $0 F 1 0 1 Square Feet I N/A 1 $7.50 $0 G1 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $0 G2 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $0 G3 0 Square Feet N/A $7.50 $0 G4** Square Feet $7.50 $0 Total $110,175 * Public land under ISD 281 Robbinsdale School District jurisdiction - potential to negotiate. **TBA awaiting as -built analysis results Additional Line Item Costs Unit Cost Segment or Nevada Avenue bike lane* 0.50 miles $26,500 Segment E6, trail reconstruction** 0.45 miles $177,750 Level B Wayfinding Signage ($25,850 each) 3 $77,550 Level C Wayfinding Signage ($6,050 each) 3 $18,150 French Regional Park Signage 1 $19,800 Theodore Wirth Regional Park Signage*** 1 $1,500 Traffic signage and devices 7.03 miles $21,090 Rest stops 7.03 miles $47,101 * Optional short term solution ** Costs borne of the City of Crystal and/or developer *** rn conjunction with Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPR B) kiosk signage Draft July 21, 2011 Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan 79 r Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan ThreeRivers Public Feedback PARK DISTRICT Any spelling or grammatical errors found within the public feedback text are those of the originating author and not of the Three Rivers Park District (Park District). Names and addresses have been omitted to protect public contributor privacy. Public Feedback Prior to Comment Period June 1, 2011 I am wondering if there is a map available on line to view the trail plans. Thank you. *Responded by Park District staff with follow up: Thank you. I will not be available to attend the meeting as I will be out of town that week. I will follow up with any further questions that may arise in the future. I appreciate your response. *Responded by Park District staff with follow up: Thank you very much for the follow up! This will be helpful to the buyers June 8, 2011 I will be out of town the night of the open house next Tuesday night but wanted to give my support for the proposed alignment of the trail through the park between Boone Ave N. and Winnetka Ave N. I have been opposed to having the trail run down 32n0 Ave between Boone and Winnetka because of the number of driveways it would have to cross and the safety issues that presents. I think this routing is a good compromise and clearly safer for the trail users. *Responded by Park District staff June 14, 2010 Thanks for placing notices in the community paper about this meeting [open house]! June 14, 2010 Hopefully you get the money and get it done. June 14, 2010 We are excited to have this done - keep pushing for those grants. Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan - Public Feedback Page 1 1 June 14, 2010 Good plan - go for it. June 22, 2011 Hello, My name is [removed for privacy], and I'm with the Golden Valley Patch. I'm working on an update on the progress of the Bassett Creek Regional Trail. I was unable to attend the June 14 open house, but I am hoping to get a comment on how the event went. I'm looking for someone I can talk to just about a status update on the plans and what the next steps are. *Responded by Park District staff July 1, 2011 Hello, The purpose of this message is to provide comments on the proposed multi -use path from French Park to Wirth Park. I am a road bicyclists who has ridden much of the proposed route on the adjacent city streets. I want you to know that the proposed route creates many unsafe crossings for bicyclist. This trail is designed to move bicyclists off city streets onto a sidewalk. It may be a 10 foot multi user path to its users but it will be treated as a sidewalk to motorists on the adjacent city streets. In most cities riding a bicycle on a sidewalk or in the opposite flow of traffic is illegal. The proposed trail creates both situations in practice. Bicycles belong in the streets (as MN law permits) for the safety of the bicyclist since only then can a motorists see and react to them safety. A person may feel safe on a bike path (sidewalk) but studies have shown that a person riding a bike in the street is far safer. Other Three Rivers multi -use paths have much longer uninterrupted routes where the intersections with motorists are at a right angle. This new path will run just a few feet from the motorist roadway such that turning vehicles will be turning with no reaction time for either the motorist or the bicyclist. I was told at the recent open house that STOP signs would be on the trail only when STOP signs would be on the streets for motorist. The alternative is for the bicyclist to stop, dismount, and look right & left and most importantly behind them to see approaching vehicles turning. This is an unsafe condition especially given all the intersections and driveways to be crossed. I commend you for building this multi -use route but it does need to be designed differently. It should not be advertised as a commuter route since no commuter I know would expose themselves to so much turning traffic (see right hook in weblink) nor route themselves thru the park in New Hope off of 36th. The City of Minneapolis has embraced marked bike lanes and separate bike and pedestrians paths. It appears to me your goal has been to make a continuous route between to the parks Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan - Public Feedback Page 1 2 which is good. It does not appear that bicycle safety or Mn state law on equal access to roadways has been addressed. My suggestion is that you create a marked bike lane on the entire proposed route IN BOTH DIRECTIONS on the existing shoulder next to your multi -use path. Only then can bicyclists follow the traffic laws which govern them. Here is a weblink htto://bicyclesafe.com/ which outlines "How to avoid being hit by a car". You will see that the sidewalk bike path you are proposing introduces these risks. You need to think about how motorist see or don't see bicyclist when they are on a sidewalk or multi -use path. I urge you to carefully study this document then look at your proposed multi -use path. Ask yourself: What can be done in the design to avoid these hazards? Mixing bicycles with pedestrians on a 10 foot sidewalk is not the answer. *Responded by Park District staff July 20, 2011 Hi, I'm a commuter biker who currently has to "park and ride" in order to take a trail to downtown. I live in New Hope. It sounds like when this is complete I'll be able to ride basically from my house to downtown Minneapolis and beyond. THAT is incredible! Can you give me a rough idea where the path will go? I'm all for this! As is my wife! *Responded by Park District staff with follow up: I've studied the route, and it is impressive! One comment below: 1. One area that will need some more study is the intersection of 36th Ave and Winnetka Ave. The SA gas station in the NE quadrant is very, very busy, with two entrances/exits. The other gas station in the SW quadrant is not as busy and the exit onto Winnetka Ave restricts traffic so that you have to turn right (south) out of the station. That restriction means that there's one less "stream" of traffic coming into the intersection from that side. So one thought would be to cross 36th Ave on the West side of Winnetka, and then cross Winnetka on the south side of 36th - basically the quadrant opposite SA. (Currently the plan is to cross Winnetka on the north side of 36th and then cross 36th on the east side of Winnetka). Again, this is a great development. We really look forward to using this trail! Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan - Public Feedback Page 1 3 Public Feedback During Comment Period August 10, 2011 I think the trail is a wonderful idea. *Responded by Park District staff August 17, 2011 I read the article in the Star Tribune regarding the trail extension project. I looked at the plan and it appears that the proposed extension through Golden Valley will run along Golden Valley road. I am wondering if there has been any discussion about the routing or interconnecting the proposed improvements with southern border of Rice Lake Nature Area/Park. If so, is there a more detailed map of the proposed connecting trail. *Responded by Park District staff August 19, 2011 Hi! I would love to see the trail completed.. My husband and I do alot of biking and live right on the proposed trail. It would be great to have it done as soon as possible. Thanks, *Responded by Park District staff August 24, 2011 The proposed trail through Golden Valley is a beautiful concept. I look forward to riding on this trail and having commuters see our beautiful neighborhoods and green spaces. But there are other alternatives that should be thoroughly examined. Concerns with the proposed trail in Golden Valley: 1. Regent Avenue was just repaved and a new sidewalk was installed one-two years ago. It doesn't make sense to rip it up again - even if it's a small portion - at taxpayer expense. 2. Neighbors near the proposed trail have not had an adequate chance to weigh in on the issue. Could there be a neighborhood meeting and how will their input factor into the final decision? 3. What kind of costs will the city incur for ongoing maintenance or is this a shared venture between the city and Three Rivers? 4. The city is concerned about the proposed trail on the south side of Golden Valley Road and has expressed support for it to be on the north side of the street. A north side trail appears to be more difficult to install as - in some cases - there is very little room. A south side route seems more appropriate since there's already a sidewalk Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan — Public Feedback Page 1 4 that bikers and walkers use. Surely we can figure out the right balance between the Courage Center and the bike trail. Suggested alternatives -- Have the rail come down Douglas Drive and then connect to County Road 66 at Duluth Street. Alternatively, have the trail come down Winnetka Avenue, turn East onto Olympia, turn North on Douglas and then East on to Duluth. Benefits to alternatives: 1. More of Golden Valley - and its neighborhoods and green spaces -- is seen by trail riders. 2. The Hampshire Park neighborhood should weigh in on this proposal but has appeared comfortable with bikers riding on Olympia. 3. Douglas Drive and Duluth Street are scheduled in the next several years for reconstruction. Why not save tax dollars and partner together to have the trail put it at the same time? 4. Maintenance costs could also be cheaper and shared among city, county and Three Rivers entities. Thank you for accepting this public input. Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan - Public Feedback Page 1 5 1:011VA0Eel a-Y&IraI RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE BASSETT CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, The City of Crystal recognizes Bassett Creek Regional Trail as an important component of the regional parks system that serves residents of the City and the region; and WHEREAS, The City of Crystal recognizes that Three Rivers Park District has gathered significant public input in the development of the master plan for Bassett Creek Regional Trail; and WHEREAS, The City of Crystal recognizes that Three Rivers Park District has drafted the Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan; and WHEREAS, The Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan is consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, The City of Crystal supports the management and development of Bassett Creek Regional Trail pursuant to the Three Rivers Park District Master Plan, provided that certain specific concerns are addressed in the future regarding particular trail segments. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Crystal supports the Bassett Creek Regional Trail Master Plan and hereby recommends that Three Rivers Park District manage and develop the Regional Trail within the conditions and guidelines delineated by the District's Board of Commissioners in the Master Plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following specific concerns will be addressed at some later date: 1. For the segment along 32nd Avenue from Hampshire Avenue to Douglas Drive, the final design must recognize and be sensitive to the potential impacts on adjacent single family homes; and 2. For the crossing of Douglas Drive at 32nd Avenue, the final design must include reasonable steps to facilitate safe crossing by trail users; and 3. On the south side of 32nd Avenue near the Trunk Highway 100 noisewall, the trail currently crosses a future development site and may be re-routed by the city or a developer so that it more closely follows 32"d Avenue and the noisewall. V Adopted by the Crystal City Council this day of 12011. m Z ReNae J. Bowman, Mayor ATTEST: Chrissy Serres, City Clerk REGULAR AGENDA #11 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY of AL Consider Contract — Sumter Avenue Watermain CRYST FROM: Tom Mathisen, Public Works Director & City Engineer TO: Anne Norris, City Manager (for September 20 City Council Meeting) DATE: September 8, 2011 RE: Project #2011-17 Water Utility Fund Main Replacement Project There is $172,000 budgeted in the Water Utility 2011 CIP (#6220). Work load this construction season has not allowed time for the Engineering Department to develop plans for this project until now. While it is late in the season, it is hoped that the work can still be done this year. Quotes will be received from several contractors by Monday September 19. If the pricing is favorable, the results will be presented to the Council for action at the September 20 meeting. R ectfully,u mitted, �' A Thos as A. Mathlsen City Engineer is/pubworks/projects/2011/2011-17 Sumter Ave Watermain Replacement/awardmeml COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REGULAR AGENDA #12 CITY PHASE 11 SEWER REPAIR AND DRIVEWAY C!CRYSTAL ASSESSMENTS FROM: Tom Mathisen, Public Works Director & City Engineer TO: Anne Norris, City Manager (for September 20 City Council Meeting) DATE: September 8, 2011 RE: Declare Amount to Be Assessed, Order Preparation of Assessment Roll and Set Date for Public Hearing - Phase 11 Private Sanitary Sewer and Driveway Construction - Project #2010-11 INTRODUCTION As part of the Phase 11 Street Reconstruction Project, property owners were given the opportunity to install new driveways and have their sewer service repaired. The cost could be either paid up front or put on a special assessment. The work has been completed and the schedule proposed herein for the assessment process will make the County's deadline for next year's property taxes. DISCUSSION Of the 344 parcels in Phase 11, 69 participated in the driveway program (92 in Phase 10), and 54 in the sewer repair program (124 in Phase 10). Of these, 18 had both done (30 in Phase 10). While every participant signed an agreement indicating the estimated cost of the proposed work and waiving their right to appeal the assessment, it is still necessary to go through the formal assessment process. In order to meet the end of November deadline set by the County and to allow for the hearing notice and a thirty day prepayment period, it is necessary for the Council to adopt the two attached resolutions which order the preparation of the assessment roll and set the hearing date for October 18, 2011. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resolution, which performs the functions described above Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Mathisen City Engineer Upubworks/projects/2011 /Phase 11 /sewrdrvwmem RESOLUTION NO. 2011 - DECLARING AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED, ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL AND SETTING DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING BROADWAY PARK PHASE 11 DRIVEWAYS AND SEWER SERVICES PROJECT #2010-11 WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statues Chapter 429, costs have been calculated for the improvement of driveways and sanitary sewer for the Broadway Park Phase 11 Street Reconstruction and the price for such improvements is $351,100.11. (compares to $441,345.61 in Phase 10). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CRYSTAL CITY COUNCIL: 1. The cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $351,100.11 of which $91,597.34 is for sewer repair and $259,502.77 is for driveways (compares to $161,692.00 and $279,653.61 respectively in Phase 10). 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2011 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0% per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the area affected, without regard to cash calculation, as provided by law, and the Clerk shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in City offices for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment preparation, notify the Council thereof. A hearing shall be held on the 181h of October 2011 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 4141 Douglas Drive, Crystal, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. Adopted by the Crystal City Council this 20th day of September, 2011. ReNae J. Bowman, Mayor ATTEST: Christina Serres, City Clerk l: pubworks/projects/phasel 1 /sewrdrvwres COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REGULAR AGENDA #13 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Lining Project Award of Contract FROM: Tom Mathisen, Public Works Director & City Engineer TO: Anne Norris, City Manager (for September 20 City Council Meeting) DATE: September 14, 2011 RE: Consider Bids, Award Contract, Sewer Utility Project #2010-14A CIPP Sanitary Sewer Lining (Forest North Neighborhood) On August 30, 2011, quotes were received for the CIPP lining and rehabilitation of sections of a deteriorating 8" VCP sanitary sewer located in the Forest North Neighborhood. Four contractors submitted a quote for this work and results are shown on the attached resolution. The low quote of $66,818.30 was submitted by Insituform Technologies. Adequate funds remain in this year's Utility Funds budget to complete this necessary work. It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the contract to the low bidder. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Mathisen City Engineer/DPW I:pubworks/projects/2010/2010-14 CIPP Lin ing/awarcicntrUrnem201014A RESOLUTION NO 2011 - AWARDING CONTRACT - SEWER UTILITY PROJECT 2010-14A CIPP SANITARY SEWER LINING WHEREAS, the City Manager's office has reviewed the quotes and recommends award to the low bidder; and WHEREAS, funds equal to the maximum estimated cost are available in the Sanitary Sewer CIP Fund (#6504) and have been budgeted by the Council; and WHEREAS, the existing 8" VCP (clay tile) sewer line was built in 1956 and the portions to be lined are in a deteriorated condition; and WHEREAS, the proposed relining project using a cured in place process (CIPP), will extend the life of the sewer line indefinitely; and WHEREAS, the following qualified bids were received on August 30, 2011: Insituform Technologies USA, Inc. $66,818.30 Veit & Company, Inc. $79,324.00 Visu-Sewer $93,745.00 Lametti & Sons $161,183.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Crystal City Council hereby awards the contract for said project to the lowest qualified bidder, that being Insituform Technologies, USA, Inc., in the amount of $66,818.30, and authorizes the City Manager to sign said contract. Adopted by the Crystal City Council this 20t1i day of September 20, 2011. ReNae J. Bowman, Mayor ATTEST: Christina Serres, City Clerk 1: pubworks/projects/2010/2010-14 CIPI' Lining/awardres201014A CRYSTAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA Tuesday, September 20, 2011 To follow immediately after the Regular City Council Meeting Conference Room A Pursuant to due call and notice given in the manner prescribed by Section 3.01 of the City Charter, the Work Session of the Crystal City Council was held at p.m. on Tuesday, September 20, 2011 in Conference Room A located at 4141 Douglas Drive, Crystal, Minnesota. I. Attendance Council members Selton Budziszewski Bowman Moore Hoffmann Anderson Deshler Staff Norris Therres Peters Sutter Banick Norton Serres II. Agenda The purpose of the work session is to discuss the following agenda items: • Changes to Comprehensive Plan required by Metropolitan Council and timeline for considering same. • West Metro Fire Board update III. Adjournment The Work Session adjourned at p.m. GACity Clerk\Council\Work sessions\2011\wsagenda 9.20.11. doe COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITYiof CRYSTAL Comprehensive Plan Update Revisions FROM: John Sutter, City Planner/Assistant Community Development Director DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW: Patrick Peters, Community Development Director DATE: September 13, 2011 TO: Anne Norris, City Manager (for September 20, 2011 work session) SUBJECT: Discuss changes to Comprehensive Plan required by Metropolitan Council and timeline for considering same NOTE FOR WEB VIEWERS: THE PLAN IS NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS MEMO DUE TO ITS LARGE FILE SIZE. PLEASE SEE THE MOST RECENT ITEM ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PAGE OF THE CITY WEBSITE AT http://www.ci.crystal.mn.us/city departments/comprehensive plan.html. A. BACKGROUND After a two-year public involvement and Planning Commission review process, on May 19, 2009 the City Council approved the city's Comprehensive Plan Update for submittal to Metropolitan Council. Over the next two years city staff worked with Metropolitan Council staff to address their need for additional information and to ensure conformance with regional system plans. These discussions concluded on August 10, 2011 when Metropolitan Council accepted the city's plan subject to the revisions negotiated by staff from both entities. Metropolitan Council's approval letter and review record are attached. The record indicates that Crystal may be excluded from the Livable Communities program because we have not guided enough land for high density residential redevelopment. Staff has resisted Metropolitan Council pressure to preemptively guide 40 more acres for redevelopment as high density residential. Instead, we recommend keeping our plan's more realistic and practical approach which identifies 23 potential redevelopment areas but recognizes that redevelopment of any of them will require a combination of willing sellers, financial feasibility, market demand, site appropriateness and political support for specific projects. It PAGE 1 OF 6 would be meaningless to try and guess which of these 23 potential redevelopment areas will see all of these stars align over the next 20 years. Now that Metropolitan Council has taken action, the Planning Commission and City Council need to consider the negotiated changes. Proposed timeline: • 9/12/2011 Plan Comm work session to review negotiated changes • 9/20/2011 Council work session to review negotiated changes • 10/10/2011 Plan Comm meeting to consider resolution approving changes • 10/18/2011 Council meeting to consider resolution approving changes Upon approval of the revisions to the Comprehensive Plan, the city must amend its Zoning Ordinance and other city codes for consistency with the plan. At that time, additional code changes may be considered based on Planning Commission and Council discussions since the previous re -write of the Zoning Ordinance in 2003. B. PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed changes are in bold on the enclosed plan, with deletions indicated by strikethro and additions indicated by underlining. PAGE(S) DESCRIPTION p 1 Chapter title changes. p 3 Process text updated. p 11 Forecast text updated. pp 13-16 Revised forecasts: The forecasts have all been revised downward to be more realistic. Please pay special attention to the households forecast as it is the only forecast with any real consequence in terms of city land use policy. pp 19-21 Land use (general): • Descriptions of the categories have been added and gross acreage defined (pp 19-20). • Text has been added explaining how the city's legal authority to effect redevelopment has been curtailed and the impact it has on city land use and redevelopment policy (bot p 20). This is important because Metropolitan Council's redevelopment and density expectations seem unrealistic given the post -2006 legal and financial climate. PAGE 2OF6 • Three particular resource protection items (mid p 21) are required by Metropolitan Council but are of no consequence to city land use policy. pp 23-25 Land use based only on 2030 land use map (minimal redevelopment of existing uses): • Based on how land has already been guided in the 2030 map, the city would add 192 housing units 2010-2030 on top of the 149 added 2000-2010. This increase of 341 units would be 270 short of the 611 household increase forecast from 2000-2030. The only way to get the additional 270 units would be redevelopment requiring changes to the 2030 land use map. Specific locations for such redevelopment cannot be anticipated. • Old Tables F-1 &2 deleted because they did not contain enough information for Metropolitan Council. • New Table F-1 has been added to show forecast land use changes in five-year increments. pp 26-27 Possible additional land use changes resulting from redevelopment going beyond what is shown in the 2030 land use map: • Metropolitan Council wanted the city to guide more land for high density residential but we refused, pointing out that to do so years in advance would have no practical value. • Text has been added explaining the city's alternate approach which recognizes the legal and financial realities of redevelopment and protects the city from being forced to allow high density on a particular site without regard to community input and market conditions. Instead the city identifies potential redevelopment areas in recognition that other factors (willing sellers, market/financial conditions and community input regarding specific development proposals) will determine which, if any, actually are redeveloped by 2030. • New Table F-2 has been added to show how redevelopment of a few of these potential sites could easily close the 270 household shortfall and get the city to Metropolitan Council's 2030 forecast. • New Table F-3 has been added to show the acreage changes necessary to close the 270 household shortfall in five year increments. pp 28-29 New Figure F-1: Map of existing land use in 2000, reformatted for consistent style. pp 30-31 New Figure F-2: Map of existing land use in 2010, reformatted for consistent style. PAGE 3 OF 6 pp 32-33 New Figure F-3: Map of planned land use for 2030, reformatted for consistent style. pp 34-41 Delete the old versions of the land use maps. pp 43-44 Housing: description of the city's three housing density classifications (mid p 43); state Metropolitan Council's goal for new housing units by 2020 and explain how city expects to meet this goal (top p 44); restate how the city expects redevelopment to achieve the housing goals (bot p 44). pp 47-52 Redevelopment: technical correction (top p 47); add Cavanagh school as potential redevelopment site per ISD 281 divestiture plans (mid p 50); move discussion of Crystal Airport to the end of the list of potential redevelopment areas, differentiate it from the other areas, and modify text to satisfy Metropolitan Council (mid p 52); renumber the redevelopment areas to reflect these changes. pp 54-55 New Figure H-1: Map of potential redevelopment areas: • Reformatted for consistent style. • Crystal Airport visually differentiated. • Cavanagh school property added. • Redevelopment areas renumbered. pp 56-59 Delete the old version of the potential redevelopment areas map. pp 70-71 New Figure 1-1: Map of roadway jurisdictions: • Reformatted for consistent style "Idealized" MSA route changes are not shown because they were reconstructed in prior years and the state will not allow the city to un -designate them without financial penalty. Traffic counts are not shown because they are shown on the roadway functional classification map. pp 72-75 Delete the old version of the roadway jurisdiction map. p 78 Roadway functional classification: Added discussion of TAZ allocations, use of Hennepin County forecasts and access management guidelines (to satisfy Metropolitan Council). pp 82-83 New Figure J-1: Map of functional classification/traffic volumes: • Reformatted for consistent style. • Traffic volumes, 2009 actual and 2030 forecast, are shown only for Hennepin County roads because if the city had shown the actuals for local streets then it would have had to hire a PAGE 4OF6 consulting engineer to set up and run a computer model to develop a forecast for local streets; and the configuration of local streets is not likely to see significant change anyway. p 85 New Table J-1: Forecasts by traffic activity zone (TAZ). pp 86-87 New Figure J-2: TAZ map. pp 88-91 Delete the old version of the functional classification map. pp 96-97 Non -motorized transportation: acknowledge Three Rivers' standard for multi -use facilities (top p 96); update discussion of Crystal Lake and Bassett Creek Regional Trails (bot p 96 — top p 97). pp 100-101 New Figure K-1: Map of non -motorized transportation facilities, reformatted for consistent style. pp 102-105 Delete the old version of the non -motorized transportation map. pp 107-108 Public Transit: update Metro Transit route info and list non -fixed route providers. pp 111-113 Aviation: • Add paragraph regarding continued operation of the airport (top P 111). • Add paragraph regarding aircraft noise impact areas (1St para on p 112). • Delete language prohibiting expansion of airside facilities and requiring CUPs for expansion of landside facilities (2nd para on p 112). • Process update regarding MAC's plans for the airport (5th and 6th para on p 112). • Describe necessary zoning code amendments (items 1-a) & b) on p 113). • Delete restrictive zoning language inconsistent with regional plans (items 1-c), d) & e) on p 113). • Add Metropolitan Council as one of the parties that would need to determine whether the airport is needed (part 2 on p 113). p 115 Add note to Table M-2 reflecting MAC's plan for the airport. pp 116-117 Clarify map headings for Figures M-2 and M-3. p 118 New Figure M-4: Map of 2025 forecast noise contours. PAGE 5OF6 pp 132-133 New Figure N-7: Map of existing park and trail system, reformatted for consistent style. pp 134-135 New Figure N-8: Map of planned ultimate park and trail system, reformatted for consistent style, and with Crystal Lake and Bassett Creek regional trails named. pp 136-143 Delete the old versions of the existing and planned park system maps. p 145 Revised sanitary sewer flow forecasts based on lower population, household and employment forecasts. pp 146-147 New Figure 0-1: Map of sanitary sewer system, reformatted for consistent style. p 148 Delete the old version of the sanitary sewer system map. p 149 Added text regarding the sanitary sewer system and septic tanks (top); added text referencing the city's Surface Water Management Plan and tri -city Joint Water Commission's water supply plan (bottom). pp 152 Added implementation summaries. C. COUNCIL DISCUSSION The Council should review the proposed changes, ask questions of staff, and discuss any concerns or additional changes desired. NOTE FOR WEB VIEWERS: THE PLAN IS NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS MEMO DUE TO ITS LARGE FILE SIZE. PLEASE SEE THE MOST RECENT ITEM ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PAGE OF THE CITY WEBSITE AT http:l/www.ci.crystal.mn.us/city departments/comprehensive plan.html. PAGE 6 OF 6 Metropolitan Council i August 15, 2011 Mr. John Sutter City Planner/Assistant Community Development Director City of Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive North Crystal, Minnesota 55422 RE: City of Crystal Comprehensive Plan Update — ]notice of Council Action Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20598-1 Metropolitan Council District 6, James Brimeyer Dear Mr. Sutter: The Metropolitan. Council reviewed the City of Crystal 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update (Update) at its meeting on August 10, 2011. The Council based its review on the staff's report and analysis (attached). The Council found that the City's Update meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements; conforms to the regional system plans including transportation, aviation, water resources management, and parrs; is consistent with the 2030 Regional Development Framework; and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. The Council noted that the Update is not consistent with Council policy for land use and housing. In addition to the Advisory Comments and Review Record, the Council adopted the following recommendations, That the Metropolitan Council adopts the attached Advisory Comments and Review Record, and the following: I. Authorize the City of Crystal (City) to put its 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update into effect, noting that the Update is not consistent with Council policy for land use and housing, - 2. Advise the City to: a. Send the Council the dates the Bassett Creek and Shingle Creek watersheds approve the City's local surface water management plan (LSWMP), the date the City adopts the final LSWMP, and a copy of the final LSWMP. b. Participate in Council activities to monitor redevelopment in developed communities. C. Implement the advisory comments noted in the Review Record for Land Use and Housin . 3. Approve the City of Crystal's Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plan (�P,,,r rero� a4teA-e� Please consult the attached staff report for important information about the City's next steps. Of . particular importance are the Council's actions, listed on page 1, general Advisory Comments listed on page 4, and the specific comments for technical review areas, which are found in the wwww,metrocouncll. org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 - (651) 602-1000 - Fox (651} 602-1550 - TTY (651) 291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Emplagrr body of the report, Tlie final copy of the Update needs to include all supplemental information/changes made during the review. The Council understands that the City has concerns related to the changes in its land use designations suggested in the advisory comments. Council staff will seek the opportunity to meet with you to further discuss resolution of this issue, just as occurred earlier regarding airport - related planning issues. Congratulations on completing this important project. We appreciate the City's willingness to work with Council staff on the various issues encountered during the review, and its flexibility in making revisions that helped ensure that the Update conforms to metropolitan system plans, Sincerely, Phyllis H Ion, Manager Local Planning Assistance Attachment CC: Arum Norris, City Manager Julie Monson, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Division James Brimeyer, Metropolitan Council District 6 Denise Engen, Principal Reviewer/Sector Representative Cheryl Olsen, Reviews Coordinator N: 1ComnaDeviLPAlCom7i;uiiitieslCrystallLetterslCtystal 2030 CPU- Post Council Action 20598-1,docx REVIEW RECORD City of Crystal 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update STATUTORY AUTHORITY The Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MLPA) requires local units of government to submit comprehensive plans and plan amendments to the Council for review and comment (Minn. Stat. § 473.864, Subd. 2). The Council reviews plans to determine: • Conformance with metropolitan system plans, • Consistency with other adopted Plans of the Council, and • Compatibility with the Plans of other local jurisdictions in the Metropolitan Area. The Council may require a local governmental unit to modify any plan or part thereof if, upon the adoption of findings and a resolution, the Council concludes that the Plan is more likely than not to have a substantial impact on or contain a substantial departure from metropolitan system plans (Minn. Stat. § 473.175, Subd. 1). Each local government unit shall adopt a policy plan for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage for which the local government unit is responsible, coordinated with the Metropolitan Council's plan, and may revise the same as often as it deems necessary. Each such plan shall be submitted to the Council for review and shall be subject to the approval of the Council as to those features affecting the Council's responsibilities as determined by the Council. Any such features disapproved by the Council shall be modified in accordance with the Council's recommendations (Minn. Stat. § 473.513). CONFORMANCE WITH REGIONAL SYSTEMS REGIONAL PARKS Parks and Trails Reviewer., Jan Youngquist, CD - Regional Parks System Planning, (651-602-1029) The Update is in conformance with the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan. The Update acknowledges and plans for the regional parks system facilities in the city, including the Bassett Creek Regional Trail, which will connect Clifton French Regional Park to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, and the Crystal Lakes Regional Trail, which will connect Theodore Wirth Regional Park to Elm Creek Park Reserve. The CPU indicates that the City will work with Three Rivers Park District to plan for these trails. TRANSPORTATION Roads and Transit Reviewers: Ann Braden (651-602-1705), Bob Paddock (651-602-1340), MTS - Systems Planning; Steve Mahowald - Metro Transit (612-349-7775) The Update is in conformance with the 2030 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) adopted in 2004, and addresses all the applicable transportation and transit requirements of a comprehensive plan. Crystal is served by one principal arterial, a segment of TH 100 as well as several "A" minor augmenters and relievers. Crystal lies within the Metropolitan Transit taxing district and Is within Market Area II. Service options for Market Area II include regular route locals, all day express, small vehicle circulators, special needs paratransit (ADA, senior), and ridesharing. N.ICo..Dev LPAICommunitleslCrystallReportslCgsta12030 CPU_ Committee Report kCrysto/1030 CPU Committee Report 20598-1.dou Aviation Reviewer: Russell Owen, MTS - Systems Planning, (651-602-1724) The Update is in conformance with the Aviation policies of the TPP and is consistent with Council aviation policy. The city of Crystal has Crystal airport, a reliever airport owned and operated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), located within its city boundaries. Although the City has long desired that the airport be closed and the land redeveloped, the Crystal Airport functions as a general aviation reliever for MSP International Airport, and regional plans indicate that it will continue its regional system role as a "minor" airport. The Metropolitan Council reviews local comprehensive plans for conformance with regional system plans, including the aviation system plan. During this review process the City planning staff and Council planning staff have worked cooperatively to develop mutually acceptable language pertaining to the Crystal Airport in the Update. The Update, as submitted in July 2011 is in conformance with the TPP. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Wastewater Service Reviewer: Kyle Colvin, ES - Engineering Services, (651-602-1151) The Update is in conformance with the Water Resources Management Policy Plan (WRMPP). The Update summarizes the City's vision for the next 20 years or to year 2030. It includes growth forecasts that are consistent with the Council's recommended forecasts for population, households, and employment. The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services currently provides wastewater treatment services to the city. Wastewater generated within the city is conveyed to and treated at the Metropolitan Council's Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant located in St. Paul. The city's wastewater conveyance service is provided by Council Interceptors 1 -BC -453 and 1 -MN -314. The Update projects that the city will have 10,000 sewered households and 6,600 sewered employees by 2030. The Metropolitan Disposal System with its planned scheduled improvements has or will have adequate capacity to serve the city's growth needs as identified in the Update through its Tier II plan. The Update provides sanitary flow projections in 10 -year increments. The rationale for the projections is given in the Update and determined appropriate for planning for local services. Crystal is not currently identified as a community impacted by wet weather occurrences. The Update however does include a description of an I/I reduction plan which includes televised inspection, and repair or replacement of the sanitary sewer system. The City has an ordinance that prohibits the connection of sump pumps and foundation drains to the sanitary sewer system. The ordinance also includes a provision for inspections for prohibited connections with corrections required as part of the inspector's orders. Tier II Comments The Tier II Sewer Element of the Update has been reviewed against the requirements for Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plans for developed communities. It was found to be complete and consistent with Council polices. Upon adoption of the Update by the City, the action of the Council to approve the Tier II Plan (Plan) becomes effective. At that time, the City may implement its Update to alter, expand or improve its sewage disposal system consistent with the approved Plan. A copy of the City Council Resolution adopting its Plan needs to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for its records. N: I CommDev I L PA I Communities l Crystall Reports I Crystal 2030 CPU—Committee CommitteeReportslCrystal2030CPUCommitteeReport20598-1.docx Surface Water Management Reviewer: Judy Sventek, ES - Water Resources Assessment, (651-602-1156) The Update is in conformance with the Council's WRMPP for local surface water management. Crystal lies within the Bassett Creek and Shingle Creek watersheds. Bassett Creek and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission's latest watershed management plans were approved by the Board of Water and Soil Resources in 2004. Crystal submitted its local surface water management plan (LSWMP) to the Council for review in September 2009. The LSWMP was reviewed under separate cover and found tc provide an overall framework for the City to successfully manage its water resources. The LSWMP was also found to be consistent with Council policy and the Council's WRMPP, The City needs to send the Council the dates the watersheds approve the LSWMP, the date the City adopts the final LSWMP, and a copy of the final LSWMP. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNCIL POLICY FORECASTS Reviewer: Todd Graham, CD - Research, (651-602-1322) Forecasts in the Update are consistent with regional policy. The Update proposes revised forecasts, based on the full development of Crystal, limited land supply, and redevelopment constraints. The Update observes that 149 housing units were added in Crystal during 2000-2010, but that vacancy rates have risen during the same period. The City expects that the households gain between 2010 and 2020 will be accomplished partly by new housing, and partly by a rebound in housing occupancy rates. Council staff finds the City -proposed forecasts reasonable and acceptable. The Council's forecasts will be officially revised, as shown in Table 1, effective upon Council action on the Update. Table 1: City of Crystal Forecasts 2030 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND LAND USE Reviewer: Denise Engen, CD - Local Planning Assistance, (651-602-1513) Regional Development Framework The Update is not consistent with the Regional Development Framework (RDF) policies for developed communities. As shown following, the City has not guided sufficient residential land, and at the appropriate densities, to accommodate the forecasts presented in the Update. The RDF states that developed communities need to "accommodate growth forecasts through reinvestment at appropriate densities (5 units plus in developed areas and target higher density in locations with convenient access to transportation corridors and with adequate sewer capacity)." Therefore, the City will be expected to meet densities of at N:ICommDevI L PA � Communities � Crystol�Reports � Crystal 2030 CPU Committee Reports�Crystal 2030 CPU Committee Report 20598-1.docx 000 2010 2020 2030 Census System Revised Statement System Statement Revised System Statement Revised Population 22,698 22,700 22,000 22,800 22,000 23,500 22,100 Households 9,389 9,700 9,400 10,100 9,700 10,500 10,000 Employment 5,638 6,600 5,900 7,300 6,300 8,100 6,600 2030 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND LAND USE Reviewer: Denise Engen, CD - Local Planning Assistance, (651-602-1513) Regional Development Framework The Update is not consistent with the Regional Development Framework (RDF) policies for developed communities. As shown following, the City has not guided sufficient residential land, and at the appropriate densities, to accommodate the forecasts presented in the Update. The RDF states that developed communities need to "accommodate growth forecasts through reinvestment at appropriate densities (5 units plus in developed areas and target higher density in locations with convenient access to transportation corridors and with adequate sewer capacity)." Therefore, the City will be expected to meet densities of at N:ICommDevI L PA � Communities � Crystol�Reports � Crystal 2030 CPU Committee Reports�Crystal 2030 CPU Committee Report 20598-1.docx least five units per acre through reinvestment, redevelopment, planning and zoning. The Update's Planned Land Use calls for new development below this level, with a minimum overall density of three units per acre. The Council will be monitoring redevelopment to ensure the Council's density policies for developed communities are being met, and to assess regional development and residential growth goals. The City is advised to participate in this redevelopment monitoring program. Land Use and Density Analysis The City has not guided sufficient residential land, and at the appropriate densities, to accommodate the forecasts presented in the Update. An analysis of the Update's land use is presented following. Table 2: City of Crystal, 2010 Existing Land Use Table Land Use Low Density Residential Acres 1,754.08 Percent of Total 47.5% Medium Density Residential 25.36 0.7% High Density Residential 86.37 2.3% Neighborhood Commercial 13.59 0.4% General Commercial 135.31 3.7% Industrial 87.87 2.4% Public Institutional (LDR) 98.54 2.7% Public Institutional (HDR) 2.66 0.1% Public Institutional (Gen Comm) 1.04 0.0% Public Institutional (Park) 25.40 0.7% Park 182.74 4.9% Other Undeveloped (LDR) 143.51 3.9% Other Undeveloped (I) 2.99 0.1% Railroad 48.90 1.3% Roadway Right of Way 753.73 20.4% Airport 334.46 9.0% Total 3,696.55 1 100.0% Source: City of Crystal Comprehensive Plan, version received 7/6/2011 Existing Land Use. Crystal is approximately 3,697 acres in size. The Update shows that in 2010 the City's built development was dominated by low density residential development at 1,754.08 acres (47.5%); Roadway Right -of -Way made up the second largest land use at 753.73 acres (20.4%). In 2010, there were also 25.36 acres of medium density residential (0.7%) and 86.37 acres of High Density residential land use (2.3%), and 182.74 acres of Park (4.9%). Table 2 shows the City's existing land use; existing land use is also mapped in Figures 3a and 3b. Future Land Use. The Update guides all land in the City into one of 16 future land use categories. The Update takes a unique approach by including land use categories which, while designating land for one use, also indicate a preferred use for future redevelopment, (Table 3 and Figures 4a and 413). The City is planning for very modest land use changes between 2010 and the 2030 (Table 3 and Figure 5). The largest changes are a 17.68 acre decrease in land guided as Other Undeveloped (LDR) and a 15.98 acre increase in land guided for Medium Density Residential use. MjCommDev�LPAICommunities�Crystal�ReportslCrystal2030 CPU Committee ReportsiCrysta12030 CPU Committee Report 20598-1.docx Table 3: City of Crystal, Future Land Use Table Land Use Source: Acres Change 2010-2030 (Acres) Percent of Total Low Density Residential 1,768.20 0.56 47.837. Medium Density Residential 43.85 15.98 1.19% High Density Residential 91.27 0.00 2.47% Neighborhood Commercial 13.19 -0.40 0.36% General Commercial 134.49 -1.07 3.64% Industrial 100.80 9.65 2.73% Public Institutional (LDR) 93.66 0.00 2.53% Public Institutional (HDR) 2.66 0.00 0.07% Public Institutional (Gen Comm) 1.04 0.00 0.03% Public Institutional (Park) 25.44 0.00 0.69% Park 196.85 1.29 5.33% Other Undeveloped (LDR) 94.72 -17.68 2.56% Other Undeveloped (I) 2.99 0.00 0.08% Railroad 47.48 0.00 1.28% Roadway Right of Way 745.41 -8.37 20.17% Airport 1 334.50 j 0.04 9.05% Total I 3,696.55 1 0.00 100.00/0- 00.0% Source: City of Crystal Comprehensive Plan, version received 7/6/2011 The Update proposes forecasts showing that the City will grow from 9,400 to 10,000 households between 2010 and 2030. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City had 9,349 households in 2009. This will require growth of approximately 651 additional households in order to meet the City's forecasts for 2030. The Update does not designate sufficient land above Low Density Residential to meet this forecasted household growth. As Crystal is a fully developed community, future household growth will occur mainly through redevelopment. The Update currently shows no increase in High Density land in the 2010-2030 timeframe. The low end of the Medium Density category is very low at three units per acre; this is lower than the high end of the range of the Low Density Residential category. As guided, the Update can accommodate between 49 and 195 new units at an overall density of 3 to 12 units per acre (Table 4). The minimum density is below the five units per acre minimum called for in the RDF for developed communities such as Crystal. Table 4: Residential Change by Guided Land Use Categories, 2010-2030 }>i')t;;-Ti 51It =. 7 Density Range Change In Units* Change in Net Minimum Maximum acres Percent Residential Development Development Land Use Category Min Max 2010-2030 Residential Acres Scenario Scenario Low wmsily Residential (LR) 1 5 0.6 100% 0.6 1 3 Medium Density Residential (MDR) 3 12 16.0 100% 16.0 48 192 High Density Residential (HDR) 10 22 0.0 100% 0.0 0 0 a,:'av''3' -w ;t. 1f:3.1sr" ,x+,aare sw- M Overall Density 3 12 NOTE: From Update Table F-1: Staging Table "Based ONLY on 2030 Planned Land Use Map"; received 7.6-2011 'Units rounded to whole numbers N: jCommDev�LPA�Communities�Crystal�Reports�Crystal 2030 CPU Committee Reports�Crystal 2030 CPU Committee Report 20598-1.docx In a table titled "Hypothetical Examples of Potential High Density Redevelopment Projects", the Update identifies eight properties (totaling 39.7 acres) that could accommodate between 397-873 units at the density range allowed for High Density Residential. Table 5 illustrates the development potential of these properties. The Update also indicates that 13.5 additional acres in the community could potentially be guided for high-density residential use. While the Update discusses the potential for redevelopment in the community, it does not guide the 13.5 acres, or the 39.7 acres of hypothetical redevelopment projects for such use in its 2030 Proposed Land Use Plan. The Update would be able accommodate its forecast for an additional 651 households, if the approximately 40 acres of new High Density Residential development represented by the eight identified redevelopment properties were officially guided for High Density Residential in the Planned Land Use map (Table 6). Table 5: Residential Unit Change for Redevelopment Areas, 2010-2030 NOTE: From Update Table F-2: "Hypothetical Examples of Potential High -Density Resdential Development projects'; received 7-6-11 *Units roundest to whole numbers Table 6: Residential Change by Guided Land Use Categories (with Identified Redevelopment Areas) Y ^7�}� 4•-t t. fllIII� S1<''�3513 0 it �tF$1# Ilt li�Y tSdi..l,.'., ti z.?5.: 6_L4:l( ly_RM.`.1:AnJ Density Range Change in Units* Density Range Change in Units* in acres Net Minimum Maximum Potential 2010- Percent Residential Net Minimum Maximum 2030 Residential Acres Existing Future 1 5 0.6 100% 0.6 Percent Residential Development Development Example Redevelopment Areas Land Use Land Use Min Max Acres Residential Acres Scenario Scenario Overall Density :a3rA t�,�^��� a 19 High Density General Residential ThrlRway Block Commercial (FIDR) 10 22 6.1 100% 6.1 61 135 MN Grinding/Steen Eng Industrial HDR 10 22 11.0 1.00% 1 IX 110 241 Public/ Cavanaugh (west half) Institutional HDR 10 22 4.1 1000/. 4.1 41 90 General DSMI Block Commercial HDR 10 2.2 5.3 100% 5.3 53 117 Qwest Industrial HDR 10 22 5.0 100% 5.. 5o 110 General 42nd (S side E of Colorado) Commercial HDR 10 22 3.1 10090 3.1 31 66 N'hood Douglas (W side S of 36th) Commercial 11DR 10 22 3.2 10096 3.2 32 70 36th & Noble SW corner Uncoil Conran HDR 10 22 1.9 100% Ls 19 42 �..._a,cn._. ,.t � .,gra: ,�r. .�ashc .�:s�..sk MUM m �1'S i. a�p��a�' l Z - - infill Areas Density units/acre - 10 22 NOTE: From Update Table F-2: "Hypothetical Examples of Potential High -Density Resdential Development projects'; received 7-6-11 *Units roundest to whole numbers Table 6: Residential Change by Guided Land Use Categories (with Identified Redevelopment Areas) Y ^7�}� 4•-t t. fllIII� S1<''�3513 0 it �tF$1# Ilt li�Y tSdi..l,.'., ti z.?5.: 6_L4:l( ly_RM.`.1:AnJ Density Range Change in Units* Change in acres Net Minimum Maximum 2010- Percent Residential Development Development Land Use Category Min Max 2030 Residential Acres Scenario Scenario Low Density Residential (LR) 1 5 0.6 100% 0.6 1 3 Medium Density Residential (MDR) _ 3 12 16.0 100010 16.0 48 192 High Density Residential (HDR) 10 22 39.7 100% 39.7 397 873 '�f5 MECO1-" Overall Density :a3rA t�,�^��� a 19 NOTE; From Update Table F -2i "Hypothetical Examples of Potential High Density Redevelopment Projects", received 7-6-11 *Units rounded to whole numbers Advisory Comment To accommodate its household forecasts for 2030, the City needs to guide additional medium-high density residential land that is the same or equivalent to the 40 acres of High Density Residential of the "hypothetical parcels" identified in the Update. To be consistent with RDF policy for developed communities, the minimum overall density of redevelopment areas in the Update needs to be over five units per acre. N:ICommDeviLPA�Communities ICrystaAReports ICrystal 2030CPU—Committee ReportsiCrystal2030CPU Committee Report 20598-1.docx HOUSING Reviewer: Linda Milashius, CD — Livable Communities, (651-602-1541) The Update does not fulfill the housing planning requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. The Update cites the City's official controls and the implementation programs it will use to assist in the development of affordable housing, and shows how the City is guiding land for residential development through 2030. The Update acknowledges the City's share of the region's affordable housing need for 2011-2020 (87 units). However, within this timeframe the Update does not guide a sufficient amount of residential land at higher densities to provide the opportunity for development to meet that need. Absent enough land guided at densities to facilitate affordable housing development, the Update is inconsistent with Council policy and the requirements of the Land Planning Act. One of the primary tools communities can use to provide opportunities to meet affordable housing needs is the designation of land for medium and high density development. Although allowing development at higher densities does not guarantee that affordable housing will be built, it does provide one of the best means for facilitating and allowing it to happen. When calculating the region's affordable housing need, the Council bases its analysis on land guided a minimum of 6 units per acre. Residential land use categories not meeting this minimum are not counted toward land available to address the City's share of the regional affordable housing need. The City's Medium Density Residential category with a minimum density 3 units per acre, does not meet that minimum. Although the density range for High Density Residential is 10 to 22 units per acre, there are no new acres designated in this category between 2010 and 2020. To accommodate its affordable housing need share, at least 9 additional acres should be designated for High Density residential development between 2010 and 2020. The Update provides a table of "Hypothetical Examples of Potential High Density Development Projects", which shows the potential of 39.7 acres of identified redevelopment areas to accommodate 397 housing units (Table 5). However, the City has indicated that these identified acres will not be formally designated within its High Density Residential land use category, and therefore, cannot be counted toward land available to address the City's share of the regional affordable housing need. Advisory Comment The City is encouraged to reevaluate its proposed Medium Density Residential and High Density Residential future land use designations for the 2010-2020 time period to consider options for addressing its affordable housing need share. The Update as proposed is inconsistent with Council policy and will not enable the City to fulfill the housing planning requirements of the Land Planning Act. In addition, the Update will not assist the City's ability to pursue its negotiated affordable and lifecycle housing goals as a Livable Communities Act (LCA) participating community. Without additional land guided for High Density Residential this decade, the classification of high density residential uses set forth in the City's Livable Communities Act Housing Action Plan becomes non -applicable in terms of facilitating achievement of the City's LCA housing goals. A high density category with no new land designated for such use equates to the absence of the best tool the City has available to achieve its affordable housing goals. The situation will force the Council to re-examine the City's participation in the LCA program. N:�CommDevJLPA�Communities �Crysta1�Reports ICrystat 2030CPU Committee Reports�Crysta12030CPU Committee Report 20598-1.docx SUBSURFACE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS (SSTS) PROGRAM Reviewer: Jim Larsen, CD - Local Planning Assistance, (651-602-1159) The community is entirely served by a local sanitary sewer collection system which directs flow into the MCES interceptor system for ultimate treatment at the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant. SSTS are no longer in service in the community. WATER SUPPLY Reviewer: Lanya Ross, ES - Water Supply Planning, (651-602-1803) The Update is consistent with the WRMPP for water supply. The City is a member of the Joint Water Commission (JWC), a partnership that includes the cities of Crystal and New Hope. The three cities jointly own and operate the water supply that stores and transmits potable drinking water through the three -city service area. The JWC submitted a single water supply plan that meets the Council's water supply plan requirement for these cities. The Council encourages the City to continue implementing conservation programs to promote the efficient use of water RESOURCE PROTECTION Historic Preservation Reviewer: Denise Engen, CD - Local Planning Assistance, (651-602-1513) The Update contains a section on Historic Preservation as required by the MLPA. Solar Access Protection Reviewer: Denise Engen, CD - Local Planning Assistance, (651-602-1513) The Update contains a section on Solar Access Protection as required by the MLPA. Aggregate Resources Protection Reviewer: Jim Larsen, CD - Local Planning Assistance, (651-602-1159) The Update does not address the presence or absence of aggregate resources in the community. Minnesota Geological Survey Information Circular 46 does not indicate the presence of any deposits of viable aggregate resources within the fully -urbanized community. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Reviewer: Denise Engen, CD - Local Planning Assistance, (651-602-1513) The Update includes a description of: • Capital Improvement Program Yes • Zoning Code Yes • Subdivision Code • SSTS Codes Yes 1►L1 • Housing Implementation Program Yes The Update contains an implementation chapter as required by the MLPA. The Update summarizes the City's official controls, includes a list of zoning districts and a zoning map, and provides a brief explanation of the city's subdivision and zoning ordinances, site plan review guidelines, stormwater management practice and Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Copies of these controls are included in an appendix to the Update. N: �CommDev�LPAICommunitiesICrystol�ReportsiCrystal2030 CPU Committee Reports) Crystal 2030 CPU Committee Report 20598-1.docx COMPATIBILITY WITH PLANS OF ADJACENT GOVERNMENTAL UNITS AND PLANS OF AFFECTED SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS The City submitted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update to adjacent local units of government, school districts, counties and special districts for comment on November 14, 2008. No compatibility issues with plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of affected special districts and school districts were identified. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: • Transmittal form, City of Crystal, Comprehensive Plan Update: May 2009 version, Public Hearing notice, staff report, Planning Commission and City Council resolutions, adjacent community comments; received May 29, 2009. • Correspondence, summary of changes, revised Comprehensive Plan Update: August 11, 2010 version, and implementing ordinances: subdivision regulations, zoning ordinance, site plan review, storm water management and CIP; received August 13, 2010. • Correspondence, summary of changes, revised Comprehensive Plan Update: March 8, 2011 version; received March 15, 2011. • Correspondence from City Attorney, received April 14, 2011. • Correspondence regarding proposed resolution; received May 23, 2011. • Correspondence regarding extension of review period; received June 2, 2011. • Summary of changes, revised Comprehensive Plan Update: July 1, 2011 version; received July 6, 2011. ATTACHMENTS Figure 1: Location Map Showing Regional Systems Figure 2: 2030 Regional Development Framework Planning Areas Figure 3a: Existing Land Use, 2010 (north half) Figure 3b: Existing Land Use, 2010 (south half) Figure 4a: Planned Land Use, 2030 (north half) Figure 4b: Planned Land Use, 2030 (south half) Figure 5: City of Crystal, Land Use Table in 5 -Year Stages N:ICommDeviLPAICommunities �CrystaliReports �Crystal 2030CPU—Committee Reports�Crystal2030CPUCommitteeReport20598-1.docx NOTE FOR WEB VIEWERS THE PLAN IS NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS MEMO DUE TO ITS LARGE FILE SIZE PLEASE SEE THE MOST RECENT ITEM ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PAGE OF THE CITY WEBSITE AT http://www.ci.crystal.mn.us/city departments/comprehensive plan.html