Loading...
2012.08.01 PRC Minutes Crystal Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes August 1, 2012 Lee Park Neighborhood Meeting The Crystal Parks and Recreation Commission meeting was called to order at 7:05 pm by Chairperson Tom Jungroth. Commission members in attendance were: Ms. Sodd, Mr. Moewes-Bystrom, Ms Hillenbrand, Ms. Haney, Ms. LaRoche and Ms. Merriam. Also present were: Ms. Deshler, City Council Liaison; Mr. Anderson, City Council; Lieutenant Oyaas, Ms. Norris, City Manager, Mr. Rauen and Ms. Hackett from the city staff. In addition members from the Lee Park neighborhood were in attendance. Also attending (later) was Mr, Mueller, City Council candidate. Introductions were made. Mr. Jungroth gave the purpose of the neighborhood meetings. Ms. Norris gave the residents an update of various city projects. Lieutenant Oyaas summarized police department activities and crime statistic information. Residents from Lee Park made the following comments: · Lots of small children use the park · On July 4 th there were many people in the park shooting off fireworks. · The park needs more attention to upkeep – plant/landscape area is overgrown; thistles are in the park too. · Another resident also voiced concern about maintenance of the park. o Residents were told about the Adopt a Park program · People in the park after 10pm o Call 911 · Resident comment felt there were no police patrols in the area · Kids hang out o If after 10pm, call 911 · Question regarding more safety lighting · Resident concern regarding derelict properties o Residents were informed as to how to make a complaint by phone or via the website – everything is kept anonymous · Alley reconstruction workers left lots of litter and debris each day; also piles of dirt where grass used to be o Areas will be reseeded in the fall · Question who to call regarding park maintenance issues, vandalism, etc. o Call Park Maintenance · Request to have another tree planted in the park · Question if there will be an ice rink – grass grows better without flooding it o Not flooding this park · Resident commented on the drain in the park – it could be a hazard o Park maintenance will look at it · Residents mentioned that the park is used by a lot of kids The residents were thanked for the comments. This portion of the meeting was adjourned at 7:40pm. The business meeting of the Crystal Park and Recreation Commission was classed to order at 7:45pm. Ms. Hackett reviewed the City Council work session regarding the public property shoreline policy. The resident comments were reviewed and the City Council was asked for additional input on the policy but had none. The Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the policy and forward it back to the City Council for action. Moved by Ms. Sodd and seconded by Ms. Hillenbrand to recommend to the City Council to adopt the Public Property Shoreline Policy . Motion carried. Aye: Sodd, Hillenbrand, Moewes-Bystrom, LaRoche, Merriam Nay: Jungroth, Haney Before the vote was taken, the Commission discussed the implementation of the policy and concern was voiced regarding the availability of funds to properly create and maintain the various buffer areas to the standards listed in the policy. There were feelings that the policy would hold park maintenance to a standard that perhaps could not be attained. Maintenance of what is there now is difficult with the small park maintenance staff and limited resources. Some Commission members felt that without the policy nothing will be done to create and maintain the buffer areas that are there now and those to be established in the future. Besides setting a standard for protecting water quality and restoring natural habitat, the policy sets goals to be achieved through budgeting staff and resources. Other Commission members were concerned that the policy and implementation does not address the concerns of the Twin Lakes Shores Park neighbors. They want to be able to see the lake without 5 foot tall weed trees in the sightline. Park maintenance has not been able to keep up with the existing buffer maintenance. One solution would be to mow to the lake and just make it part of the regular mowing routine. Others felt that defeats the purpose of trying to filter the water especially since we want to educate the residents and do not want them to mow to the water – it would set a bad example. Others felt that the buffer that is there now is mostly weeds/weed trees and does not set a good example for a shoreline policy. Mr. Rauen pointed out that it will cost several thousands of dollars to do the Twin Lake buffer correctly and then additional funds for yearly maintenance. Ms. Deshler informed the Commission that those funds may not be available as the City budget is very tight. Mr. Rauen was asked how the buffers at various locations are currently being maintained. Generally they are mowed 2 times per year and volunteer trees are removed as time permits. There was concern that this maintenance plan would leave Twin Lake Shore to revert to the issues that were brought up at the neighborhood meeting. Additional comments were expressed regarding Twin Lake Shores and how to address the neighbor’s concerns. Since the buffer extending from shore to the trail cannot be maintained properly, there was discussion concerning just leaving a 5 foot buffer, and have the area between the trail and buffer be mowed turf. Moved by Ms. Haney and seconded by Ms. Merriam to recommend that Twin Lake Shores be listed as a priority for maintenance for a 5 foot buffer with all buffer vegetation at 3 feet or lower and mowed turf from the trail to the buffer until the shoreline policy can be formally implemented with resources clearly identified and funded. Ms. Haney withdrew her motion in favor of another motion: Moved by Mr. Moewes-Bystrom and seconded by Ms. LaRoche to recommend that as soon as possible, Park Maintenance mows to leave a 5 foot buffer zone with all buffer vegetation at 3 feet or lower between the shore and the trail and maintain the area between the trail and the buffer as turf. Motion carried – unanimous. All Commission members felt strongly about trying to remedy the Twin Lake Shores residents issues with an unmaintained buffer area while balancing the need for water quality. It is hoped that the shoreline policy will be used as a guide to direct staff in creating the buffer areas and then to the City Council to allocate the needed resources. Staff will need to work on an implementation plan to phase in buffer zones and the funding of them. Ms. Hackett informed the Commission of the City Council discussion on the location of the fishing pier. The Commission decided to wait until winter to further discuss this item. Mr. Rauen and Mr. Mueller reported that the Crystal Fund is considering a $500 donation to the Bocce courts construction. Mr. Jungroth did not have a Chairperson Report. Ms. Deshler gave the City Council report. She reminded people to vote on August 14 for the primary. The City Council is working on the budget. Ms. Haney said the Crystal Frolics events went well. Financial reports are not ready yet. The monthly reports were given, highlighting major activities. The minutes were approved as sent. The meeting was adjourned at 8:55pm Gene Hackett Recorder